| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Kate" |
| Date: |
21 Oct 2006 06:41:03 PM |
| Object: |
God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
There is a misconception among Atheists and some Christians God is not
Omni-benevolent as in all good and mercieful. I'll clearly accept the
OT accounts and the Revelation as evidence to this God shows mercy ONLY
to those He deems worthy and who accept Him as their Lord. Being bathed
in the redeeming blood of Jesus His beloved Son that sacrificed His
life for mankinds sin will wash away our evil. To those that could not
know the Law of God such as pagans unaware of the Judeo-Christian
concepts and later of jesus they will be judged fairly according to the
Natural Light of Understanding in the conscience of men. Their works
and deeds tempered by Gods mercy will be the weight of their Judgement.
But to others God is the Final Judge and often poured out His wrath on
humanity through use of His power directly (10 Plagues of Egypt),
through actions of His servants on Earth or through nature. He may test
us with trials such as Job or by allowing bad things to happen to the
Christian. But the world is better off right now His hand is held back
as God protects His people by restraining His wrath. In the Revelation
after the Anti-Christ is revealed God will lift His protection and
Satan will be allowed to work then God will unleash the Final
Judgements upon all the world. Does that sound like a benevolent God?
It doesn't to me either so God is not all benevolent.
But God is God and as the creator of all we only must worship Him and
honor Him, we serve God and God does not serve us. And for those too
proud to accept that then the wrath poured out upon your heads will be
earned by your treachery in failing to accept God as your Master.
As a Christian I don't set the morality to judge God. Rather God sets
the morality He demands we follow to the best of our ability His Law
and Commandments.
.
|
|
| User: "GoDrex" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
21 Oct 2006 06:48:38 PM |
|
|
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161474063.524245.100180@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
There is a misconception among Atheists and some Christians God is not
Omni-benevolent as in all good and mercieful. I'll clearly accept the
OT accounts and the Revelation as evidence to this God shows mercy ONLY
to those He deems worthy and who accept Him as their Lord. Being bathed
in the redeeming blood of Jesus His beloved Son that sacrificed His
life for mankinds sin will wash away our evil. To those that could not
know the Law of God such as pagans unaware of the Judeo-Christian
concepts and later of jesus they will be judged fairly according to the
Natural Light of Understanding in the conscience of men. Their works
and deeds tempered by Gods mercy will be the weight of their Judgement.
But to others God is the Final Judge and often poured out His wrath on
humanity through use of His power directly (10 Plagues of Egypt),
through actions of His servants on Earth or through nature. He may test
us with trials such as Job or by allowing bad things to happen to the
Christian. But the world is better off right now His hand is held back
as God protects His people by restraining His wrath. In the Revelation
after the Anti-Christ is revealed God will lift His protection and
Satan will be allowed to work then God will unleash the Final
Judgements upon all the world. Does that sound like a benevolent God?
It doesn't to me either so God is not all benevolent.
But God is God and as the creator of all we only must worship Him and
honor Him, we serve God and God does not serve us. And for those too
proud to accept that then the wrath poured out upon your heads will be
earned by your treachery in failing to accept God as your Master.
As a Christian I don't set the morality to judge God. Rather God sets
the morality He demands we follow to the best of our ability His Law
and Commandments.
that doesn't seem stupid to you? I mean a god that can create everything and
is such a douche? Seems pretty stupid to me. Why does he need our worship? I
guess I'll never understand that part.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gandalf Grey" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
22 Oct 2006 01:25:26 PM |
|
|
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161474063.524245.100180@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
There is a misconception among Atheists and some Christians God is not
Omni-benevolent as in all good and mercieful. I'll clearly accept the
OT accounts and the Revelation as evidence to this God shows mercy ONLY
to those He deems worthy and who accept Him as their Lord.
And if you're a Calvinist it's still a toss up as to whether or not this
blood-thirsty 'god' will show mercy even to those who attempt to worship his
sorry *****.
Your god is not worthy of worship.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Greywolf" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
21 Oct 2006 08:14:56 PM |
|
|
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161474063.524245.100180@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
There is a misconception among Atheists and some Christians God is not
Omni-benevolent as in all good and mercieful. I'll clearly accept the
OT accounts and the Revelation as evidence to this God shows mercy ONLY
to those He deems worthy and who accept Him as their Lord. Being bathed
in the redeeming blood of Jesus His beloved Son that sacrificed His
life for mankinds sin will wash away our evil. To those that could not
know the Law of God such as pagans unaware of the Judeo-Christian
concepts and later of jesus they will be judged fairly according to the
Natural Light of Understanding in the conscience of men. Their works
and deeds tempered by Gods mercy will be the weight of their Judgement.
But to others God is the Final Judge and often poured out His wrath on
humanity through use of His power directly (10 Plagues of Egypt),
through actions of His servants on Earth or through nature. He may test
us with trials such as Job or by allowing bad things to happen to the
Christian. But the world is better off right now His hand is held back
as God protects His people by restraining His wrath. In the Revelation
after the Anti-Christ is revealed God will lift His protection and
Satan will be allowed to work then God will unleash the Final
Judgements upon all the world. Does that sound like a benevolent God?
It doesn't to me either so God is not all benevolent.
But God is God and as the creator of all we only must worship Him and
honor Him, we serve God and God does not serve us. And for those too
proud to accept that then the wrath poured out upon your heads will be
earned by your treachery in failing to accept God as your Master.
Do you want me to puke in this NG or wait until I get offline?
Are you for real? Where in the hell is your head, girl? In the toilet? You
have absolutely NO proof for the drivel you're espousing. And you're
suggesting that we all grovel for a 'God' that isn't worth two teaspoons of
my ***** on *top* of it! You are goofy.
Okay, okay. Maybe I'm being a little to melodramatic here. But what in the
world would want you to worship and 'honor' his God-ness for? He's an
immoral jerk of the first order. He is not worth groveling for. But more
importantly: He doesn't exist, little lady.
I will say this for Mr. 'I'm As Imaginary As You Can Possibly Get': He's a
first-rate imaginary actor! His pretending to be non-existent is absolutely
scintillating! Bravo! He sure has *me* convinced. Now why don't you ask
Laurence Olivier, Jr. to step forward and take some bows? What? He can't do
that? Well, why not? Is he still immersed in his role, or is he also a
part-time 'magician' makes himself disappear? Wait a minute! He isn't
*really* imaginary and non-existent now, is he?
'We serve 'God' and 'God' does not serve us.' What? Were you smokin' some of
that wacky-tabbacky when you composed your little ditty? Ugh! I better move
on to another post. My stomach is feeling mighty queasy at the moment. This
groveling for an imaginary, sadistic and malevolent non-existent deity on
the part of a brainwashed brainwasher makes me nauseous.
Greywolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
21 Oct 2006 09:28:24 PM |
|
|
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for Christians I
added the atheists only becasue they assume in many cases Christians
think God in Omni-benevolent.
As for the Ten Plagues it would not be the first time a people rewrote
their history to cover up things they did not want the world to
remember. Its quite possible the Egyptains refused to acknowledge the
wrath of God and the Hebrew peoples did. One kept no recorded evidence
and the other did its called the Book of the Exodus.
But face it even if you did find a record a tomb with the story, a
pillar of hieroglyphics or some other evidence you would refute it.
Atheists would deny any solid evidence a miracle occured.
Greywolf wrote:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161474063.524245.100180@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
There is a misconception among Atheists and some Christians God is not
Omni-benevolent as in all good and mercieful. I'll clearly accept the
OT accounts and the Revelation as evidence to this God shows mercy ONLY
to those He deems worthy and who accept Him as their Lord. Being bathed
in the redeeming blood of Jesus His beloved Son that sacrificed His
life for mankinds sin will wash away our evil. To those that could not
know the Law of God such as pagans unaware of the Judeo-Christian
concepts and later of jesus they will be judged fairly according to the
Natural Light of Understanding in the conscience of men. Their works
and deeds tempered by Gods mercy will be the weight of their Judgement.
But to others God is the Final Judge and often poured out His wrath on
humanity through use of His power directly (10 Plagues of Egypt),
through actions of His servants on Earth or through nature. He may test
us with trials such as Job or by allowing bad things to happen to the
Christian. But the world is better off right now His hand is held back
as God protects His people by restraining His wrath. In the Revelation
after the Anti-Christ is revealed God will lift His protection and
Satan will be allowed to work then God will unleash the Final
Judgements upon all the world. Does that sound like a benevolent God?
It doesn't to me either so God is not all benevolent.
But God is God and as the creator of all we only must worship Him and
honor Him, we serve God and God does not serve us. And for those too
proud to accept that then the wrath poured out upon your heads will be
earned by your treachery in failing to accept God as your Master.
Do you want me to puke in this NG or wait until I get offline?
Are you for real? Where in the hell is your head, girl? In the toilet? You
have absolutely NO proof for the drivel you're espousing. And you're
suggesting that we all grovel for a 'God' that isn't worth two teaspoons of
my ***** on *top* of it! You are goofy.
Okay, okay. Maybe I'm being a little to melodramatic here. But what in the
world would want you to worship and 'honor' his God-ness for? He's an
immoral jerk of the first order. He is not worth groveling for. But more
importantly: He doesn't exist, little lady.
I will say this for Mr. 'I'm As Imaginary As You Can Possibly Get': He's a
first-rate imaginary actor! His pretending to be non-existent is absolutely
scintillating! Bravo! He sure has *me* convinced. Now why don't you ask
Laurence Olivier, Jr. to step forward and take some bows? What? He can't do
that? Well, why not? Is he still immersed in his role, or is he also a
part-time 'magician' makes himself disappear? Wait a minute! He isn't
*really* imaginary and non-existent now, is he?
'We serve 'God' and 'God' does not serve us.' What? Were you smokin' some of
that wacky-tabbacky when you composed your little ditty? Ugh! I better move
on to another post. My stomach is feeling mighty queasy at the moment. This
groveling for an imaginary, sadistic and malevolent non-existent deity on
the part of a brainwashed brainwasher makes me nauseous.
Greywolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
23 Oct 2006 09:22:07 AM |
|
|
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161484104.805643.39650@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for Christians I
added the atheists only becasue they assume in many cases Christians
think God in Omni-benevolent.
Considering YOU added in the atheists, then perhaps you should stop whining
about the responses you receive. Idiot.
BTW, what makes you qualified to speak for your god?
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
23 Oct 2006 07:49:49 PM |
|
|
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in
news:4q418hFl5e9uU1@individual.net:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161484104.805643.39650@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for Christians I
added the atheists only becasue they assume in many cases Christians
think God in Omni-benevolent.
Considering YOU added in the atheists, then perhaps you should stop
whining about the responses you receive. Idiot.
BTW, what makes you qualified to speak for your god?
*****--I just realized that this nutbar is in Florida. Time ta circle the
wagons!
--
Doc "packin' heat" Smartass
The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of
words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people
who must use the words. - Philip K. *****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
25 Oct 2006 07:57:21 AM |
|
|
"Doc Smartass" <gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9865C9C2083D0askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in
news:4q418hFl5e9uU1@individual.net:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161484104.805643.39650@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for Christians I
added the atheists only becasue they assume in many cases Christians
think God in Omni-benevolent.
Considering YOU added in the atheists, then perhaps you should stop
whining about the responses you receive. Idiot.
BTW, what makes you qualified to speak for your god?
*****--I just realized that this nutbar is in Florida. Time ta circle the
wagons!
Uh oh! Oh well, Jabbers is in NJ. I don't find that very comforting. But
he does live in the shittiest city in the state (once voted the shittiest
city in the entire country) and far away from my neck of the woods.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
25 Oct 2006 08:55:18 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:57:21 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <4q951iFj2fctU1@individual.net>
"Doc Smartass" <gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9865C9C2083D0askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in
news:4q418hFl5e9uU1@individual.net:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161484104.805643.39650@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for Christians I
added the atheists only becasue they assume in many cases Christians
think God in Omni-benevolent.
Considering YOU added in the atheists, then perhaps you should stop
whining about the responses you receive. Idiot.
BTW, what makes you qualified to speak for your god?
*****--I just realized that this nutbar is in Florida. Time ta circle the
wagons!
Uh oh! Oh well, Jabbers is in NJ. I don't find that very comforting. But
he does live in the shittiest city in the state (once voted the shittiest
city in the entire country) and far away from my neck of the woods.
Has it ever occuirred to you that jabriol residing there is the DIRECT
CAUSE of the shittiness of said environs?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
26 Oct 2006 08:33:40 AM |
|
|
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:na50k2d8pieu5f2tkp6vcjprsdca3upa83@4ax.com...
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:57:21 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <4q951iFj2fctU1@individual.net>
"Doc Smartass" <gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9865C9C2083D0askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in
news:4q418hFl5e9uU1@individual.net:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161484104.805643.39650@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for Christians I
added the atheists only becasue they assume in many cases Christians
think God in Omni-benevolent.
Considering YOU added in the atheists, then perhaps you should stop
whining about the responses you receive. Idiot.
BTW, what makes you qualified to speak for your god?
*****--I just realized that this nutbar is in Florida. Time ta circle the
wagons!
Uh oh! Oh well, Jabbers is in NJ. I don't find that very comforting.
But
he does live in the shittiest city in the state (once voted the shittiest
city in the entire country) and far away from my neck of the woods.
Has it ever occuirred to you that jabriol residing there is the DIRECT
CAUSE of the shittiness of said environs?
LOL! Somehow I doubt that. I went to Camden, NJ once to go to the
aquarium. Not only was the aquarium a total ***** hole, but the town itself
looked like a bomb hit it.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
26 Oct 2006 09:04:11 AM |
|
|
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:na50k2d8pieu5f2tkp6vcjprsdca3upa83@4ax.com...
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:57:21 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <4q951iFj2fctU1@individual.net>
"Doc Smartass" <gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9865C9C2083D0askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in
news:4q418hFl5e9uU1@individual.net:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161484104.805643.39650@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for Christians I
added the atheists only becasue they assume in many cases Christians
think God in Omni-benevolent.
Considering YOU added in the atheists, then perhaps you should stop
whining about the responses you receive. Idiot.
BTW, what makes you qualified to speak for your god?
*****--I just realized that this nutbar is in Florida. Time ta circle the
wagons!
Uh oh! Oh well, Jabbers is in NJ. I don't find that very comforting. But
he does live in the shittiest city in the state (once voted the shittiest
city in the entire country) and far away from my neck of the woods.
Has it ever occuirred to you that jabriol residing there is the DIRECT
CAUSE of the shittiness of said environs?
LOL! Somehow I doubt that. I went to Camden, NJ once to go to the
aquarium. Not only was the aquarium a total ***** hole, but the town itself
looked like a bomb hit it.
I can agree with that - the one time I've ever been in New Jersey at all, Dale
and I went up 295 as far as Camden and then had to take 676 to get into
Philadelphia. A small tactical nuke would be a major improvement for what
parts of Camden we saw from the freeway.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Grand Rapids 3 (SO) (October 21)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 27 vs. Hamilton, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
26 Oct 2006 09:30:51 AM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xj3gomc.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
snip
LOL! Somehow I doubt that. I went to Camden, NJ once to go to the
aquarium. Not only was the aquarium a total ***** hole, but the town
itself
looked like a bomb hit it.
I can agree with that - the one time I've ever been in New Jersey at all,
Dale
and I went up 295 as far as Camden and then had to take 676 to get into
Philadelphia. A small tactical nuke would be a major improvement for what
parts of Camden we saw from the freeway.
Yeah, I was pretty shocked the one time I went there. You always see the
big sign for the Camden Aquarium on the way down the Garden State Parkway
South to the Jersey Shore. It never crossed my mind that it was a piece of
crap in the middle of the country's worst eyesore.
I'm sorry that was your introduction to "Joisey". Where I live (Bergen
County), it's MUCH nicer :)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
26 Oct 2006 07:37:38 PM |
|
|
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xj3gomc.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
snip
LOL! Somehow I doubt that. I went to Camden, NJ once to go to the
aquarium. Not only was the aquarium a total ***** hole, but the town
itself
looked like a bomb hit it.
I can agree with that - the one time I've ever been in New Jersey at all,
Dale
and I went up 295 as far as Camden and then had to take 676 to get into
Philadelphia. A small tactical nuke would be a major improvement for what
parts of Camden we saw from the freeway.
Yeah, I was pretty shocked the one time I went there. You always see the
big sign for the Camden Aquarium on the way down the Garden State Parkway
South to the Jersey Shore. It never crossed my mind that it was a piece of
crap in the middle of the country's worst eyesore.
I'm sorry that was your introduction to "Joisey". Where I live (Bergen
County), it's MUCH nicer :)
The rest of it, up 295 to Camden, was much nicer...and after Camden, anything
would have to be nicer (even Bergen, which is shown as about 95% urban by Rand
McNally, except for the south end of the Ramapos and the little sliver along
the Bergen/Passaic line north of Wayne).
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Grand Rapids 3 (SO) (October 21)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 27 vs. Hamilton, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
27 Oct 2006 08:08:17 AM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkzmbir3u5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xj3gomc.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
snip
LOL! Somehow I doubt that. I went to Camden, NJ once to go to the
aquarium. Not only was the aquarium a total ***** hole, but the town
itself
looked like a bomb hit it.
I can agree with that - the one time I've ever been in New Jersey at
all,
Dale
and I went up 295 as far as Camden and then had to take 676 to get into
Philadelphia. A small tactical nuke would be a major improvement for
what
parts of Camden we saw from the freeway.
Yeah, I was pretty shocked the one time I went there. You always see the
big sign for the Camden Aquarium on the way down the Garden State Parkway
South to the Jersey Shore. It never crossed my mind that it was a piece
of
crap in the middle of the country's worst eyesore.
I'm sorry that was your introduction to "Joisey". Where I live (Bergen
County), it's MUCH nicer :)
The rest of it, up 295 to Camden, was much nicer...and after Camden,
anything
would have to be nicer (even Bergen, which is shown as about 95% urban by
Rand
McNally, except for the south end of the Ramapos and the little sliver
along
the Bergen/Passaic line north of Wayne).
95% "urban"? LOL! Hardly - Your map lies. Passaic country (where all my
sis-in-laws live) is very urban, but I would never use that word to describe
the area where I live. We've got freakin' deer, bear and coyotes, for
goodness sakes! :)
Very suburban, thank you very much. Still with some nice farm land as well.
I drive by a small farm with horses every day. One of them was kicking up
his heels as I passed by there about an hour ago :)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
27 Oct 2006 11:08:18 AM |
|
|
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkzmbir3u5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xj3gomc.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
snip
LOL! Somehow I doubt that. I went to Camden, NJ once to go to the
aquarium. Not only was the aquarium a total ***** hole, but the town
itself
looked like a bomb hit it.
I can agree with that - the one time I've ever been in New Jersey at all,
Dale and I went up 295 as far as Camden and then had to take 676 to get
into Philadelphia. A small tactical nuke would be a major improvement
for what parts of Camden we saw from the freeway.
Yeah, I was pretty shocked the one time I went there. You always see the
big sign for the Camden Aquarium on the way down the Garden State Parkway
South to the Jersey Shore. It never crossed my mind that it was a piece
of
crap in the middle of the country's worst eyesore.
I'm sorry that was your introduction to "Joisey". Where I live (Bergen
County), it's MUCH nicer :)
The rest of it, up 295 to Camden, was much nicer...and after Camden,
anything would have to be nicer (even Bergen, which is shown as about 95%
urban by Rand McNally, except for the south end of the Ramapos and the
little sliver along the Bergen/Passaic line north of Wayne).
95% "urban"? LOL! Hardly - Your map lies. Passaic country (where all my
sis-in-laws live) is very urban, but I would never use that word to describe
the area where I live. We've got freakin' deer, bear and coyotes, for
goodness sakes! :)
That figures - RMcN needs to be taken with a couple of tons of salt, when it
comes to depictions of urban areas. They've got supposedly urban areas on the
south and west fringes of the Houston area that are still farmland, and just
to even it out, they depict quite a few spots that have had suburban
neighborhoods for years as still being out in the sticks. Apparently, they
have a chimp wielding a mouse using a graphics editor, and letting it put the
orange shading where it chooses...
Very suburban, thank you very much. Still with some nice farm land as well.
I drive by a small farm with horses every day. One of them was kicking up
his heels as I passed by there about an hour ago :)
Pretty much the same here, but they're receding a bit in Fort Bend County,
where it's exploding (as the result of people getting out of the big city so
they can re-create it 25 miles away from downtown)...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, Grand Rapids 3 (SO) (October 21)
NEXT GAME: Friday, October 27 vs. Hamilton, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
27 Oct 2006 01:17:27 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkpscdoi6l.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkzmbir3u5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
snip
The rest of it, up 295 to Camden, was much nicer...and after Camden,
anything would have to be nicer (even Bergen, which is shown as about
95%
urban by Rand McNally, except for the south end of the Ramapos and the
little sliver along the Bergen/Passaic line north of Wayne).
95% "urban"? LOL! Hardly - Your map lies. Passaic country (where all my
sis-in-laws live) is very urban, but I would never use that word to
describe
the area where I live. We've got freakin' deer, bear and coyotes, for
goodness sakes! :)
That figures - RMcN needs to be taken with a couple of tons of salt, when
it
comes to depictions of urban areas. They've got supposedly urban areas on
the
south and west fringes of the Houston area that are still farmland, and
just
to even it out, they depict quite a few spots that have had suburban
neighborhoods for years as still being out in the sticks. Apparently,
they
have a chimp wielding a mouse using a graphics editor, and letting it put
the
orange shading where it chooses...
LOL - sound like it. Granted there's not as much open space as there used
to be, but it's still hardly urban :)
Very suburban, thank you very much. Still with some nice farm land as
well.
I drive by a small farm with horses every day. One of them was kicking up
his heels as I passed by there about an hour ago :)
Pretty much the same here, but they're receding a bit in Fort Bend County,
where it's exploding (as the result of people getting out of the big city
so
they can re-create it 25 miles away from downtown)...
The main thing they're doing in my area that I don't care for is knocking
down all the cute old homes and putting up McMansions :P
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
29 Oct 2006 10:16:29 AM |
|
|
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkpscdoi6l.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkzmbir3u5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
snip
The rest of it, up 295 to Camden, was much nicer...and after Camden,
anything would have to be nicer (even Bergen, which is shown as about 95%
urban by Rand McNally, except for the south end of the Ramapos and the
little sliver along the Bergen/Passaic line north of Wayne).
95% "urban"? LOL! Hardly - Your map lies. Passaic country (where all my
sis-in-laws live) is very urban, but I would never use that word to
describe the area where I live. We've got freakin' deer, bear and coyotes,
for goodness sakes! :)
That figures - RMcN needs to be taken with a couple of tons of salt, when
it comes to depictions of urban areas. They've got supposedly urban areas
on the south and west fringes of the Houston area that are still farmland,
and just to even it out, they depict quite a few spots that have had
suburban neighborhoods for years as still being out in the sticks.
Apparently, they have a chimp wielding a mouse using a graphics editor, and
letting it put the orange shading where it chooses...
LOL - sound like it. Granted there's not as much open space as there used
to be, but it's still hardly urban :)
It's either that, or they're drawing lots and tossing darts at a map. ;-)
Very suburban, thank you very much. Still with some nice farm land as
well. I drive by a small farm with horses every day. One of them was
kicking up his heels as I passed by there about an hour ago :)
Pretty much the same here, but they're receding a bit in Fort Bend County,
where it's exploding (as the result of people getting out of the big city
so they can re-create it 25 miles away from downtown)...
The main thing they're doing in my area that I don't care for is knocking
down all the cute old homes and putting up McMansions :P
That's been going on in a few parts of the southwest city for the better part
of a decade, and inside the Loop it's getting obnoxious. The best example is
the swarm of new high-rise condos popping up around the Galleria area, one of
which sits between North Rice Avenue (as opposed to Rice Boulevard, which is
in another part of town) and Sage Road, a stretch of almost 450 feet: four
residences in each floor (two on the north face, two on the south)...and 25
stories tall. To the west is the former Lamar Terrace community (now
"sanitized" into St. George Place) that's basically still single-floor
structures, along with the Larchmont subdivision across Rice and between
Richmond and the Southwest Freeway, looking up at the funny people on the
upper floors, who will have some interesting times when the next Rita-sized
storm inevitably visits.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 7, Peoria 1 (October 28)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, November 1 vs. Chicago, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
29 Oct 2006 09:50:10 PM |
|
|
On 29 Oct 2006 10:16:29 -0600, The Chief Instigator
<patrick@fnord.io.com> wrote in alt.atheism
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkpscdoi6l.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkzmbir3u5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
snip
The rest of it, up 295 to Camden, was much nicer...and after Camden,
anything would have to be nicer (even Bergen, which is shown as about 95%
urban by Rand McNally, except for the south end of the Ramapos and the
little sliver along the Bergen/Passaic line north of Wayne).
95% "urban"? LOL! Hardly - Your map lies. Passaic country (where all my
sis-in-laws live) is very urban, but I would never use that word to
describe the area where I live. We've got freakin' deer, bear and coyotes,
for goodness sakes! :)
That figures - RMcN needs to be taken with a couple of tons of salt, when
it comes to depictions of urban areas. They've got supposedly urban areas
on the south and west fringes of the Houston area that are still farmland,
and just to even it out, they depict quite a few spots that have had
suburban neighborhoods for years as still being out in the sticks.
Apparently, they have a chimp wielding a mouse using a graphics editor, and
letting it put the orange shading where it chooses...
LOL - sound like it. Granted there's not as much open space as there used
to be, but it's still hardly urban :)
It's either that, or they're drawing lots and tossing darts at a map. ;-)
Very suburban, thank you very much. Still with some nice farm land as
well. I drive by a small farm with horses every day. One of them was
kicking up his heels as I passed by there about an hour ago :)
Pretty much the same here, but they're receding a bit in Fort Bend County,
where it's exploding (as the result of people getting out of the big city
so they can re-create it 25 miles away from downtown)...
The main thing they're doing in my area that I don't care for is knocking
down all the cute old homes and putting up McMansions :P
That's been going on in a few parts of the southwest city for the better part
of a decade, and inside the Loop it's getting obnoxious. The best example is
the swarm of new high-rise condos popping up around the Galleria area, one of
which sits between North Rice Avenue (as opposed to Rice Boulevard, which is
in another part of town) and Sage Road, a stretch of almost 450 feet: four
residences in each floor (two on the north face, two on the south)...and 25
stories tall. To the west is the former Lamar Terrace community (now
"sanitized" into St. George Place) that's basically still single-floor
structures, along with the Larchmont subdivision across Rice and between
Richmond and the Southwest Freeway, looking up at the funny people on the
upper floors, who will have some interesting times when the next Rita-sized
storm inevitably visits.
No worries! Shrub and the Rethugs'll take care of them!....
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lucifer" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
27 Oct 2006 08:35:59 AM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkzmbir3u5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xj3gomc.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
snip
LOL! Somehow I doubt that. I went to Camden, NJ once to go to the
aquarium. Not only was the aquarium a total ***** hole, but the town
itself
looked like a bomb hit it.
I can agree with that - the one time I've ever been in New Jersey at
all,
Dale
and I went up 295 as far as Camden and then had to take 676 to get into
Philadelphia. A small tactical nuke would be a major improvement for
what
parts of Camden we saw from the freeway.
Yeah, I was pretty shocked the one time I went there. You always see the
big sign for the Camden Aquarium on the way down the Garden State Parkway
South to the Jersey Shore. It never crossed my mind that it was a piece
of
crap in the middle of the country's worst eyesore.
I'm sorry that was your introduction to "Joisey". Where I live (Bergen
County), it's MUCH nicer :)
The rest of it, up 295 to Camden, was much nicer...and after Camden,
anything
would have to be nicer (even Bergen, which is shown as about 95% urban by
Rand
McNally, except for the south end of the Ramapos and the little sliver
along
the Bergen/Passaic line north of Wayne).
95% "urban"? LOL! Hardly - Your map lies. Passaic country (where all my
sis-in-laws live) is very urban, but I would never use that word to describe
the area where I live. We've got freakin' deer, bear and coyotes, for
goodness sakes! :)
Very suburban, thank you very much. Still with some nice farm land as well.
I drive by a small farm with horses every day. One of them was kicking up
his heels as I passed by there about an hour ago :)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
<whisper> Robyn </whisper>
Neheheheheheigh
Just testing...
--
Lucifer the Unsubtle, EAC Librarian of Dark Tomes of Excessive Evil and
General Purpose Igor
The Anti-Theist
"Don't worry, I won't bite.......hard"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
27 Oct 2006 08:54:07 AM |
|
|
"Lucifer" <wyrdology@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1161956159.193517.300200@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkzmbir3u5.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szk8xj3gomc.fsf@eris.io.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> writes:
snip
LOL! Somehow I doubt that. I went to Camden, NJ once to go to the
aquarium. Not only was the aquarium a total ***** hole, but the town
itself
looked like a bomb hit it.
I can agree with that - the one time I've ever been in New Jersey at
all,
Dale
and I went up 295 as far as Camden and then had to take 676 to get
into
Philadelphia. A small tactical nuke would be a major improvement for
what
parts of Camden we saw from the freeway.
Yeah, I was pretty shocked the one time I went there. You always see
the
big sign for the Camden Aquarium on the way down the Garden State
Parkway
South to the Jersey Shore. It never crossed my mind that it was a
piece
of
crap in the middle of the country's worst eyesore.
I'm sorry that was your introduction to "Joisey". Where I live (Bergen
County), it's MUCH nicer :)
The rest of it, up 295 to Camden, was much nicer...and after Camden,
anything
would have to be nicer (even Bergen, which is shown as about 95% urban
by
Rand
McNally, except for the south end of the Ramapos and the little sliver
along
the Bergen/Passaic line north of Wayne).
95% "urban"? LOL! Hardly - Your map lies. Passaic country (where all my
sis-in-laws live) is very urban, but I would never use that word to
describe
the area where I live. We've got freakin' deer, bear and coyotes, for
goodness sakes! :)
Very suburban, thank you very much. Still with some nice farm land as
well.
I drive by a small farm with horses every day. One of them was kicking
up
his heels as I passed by there about an hour ago :)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
<whisper> Robyn </whisper>
Neheheheheheigh
Frau Blucher? ;)
Just testing...
Ha! A likely story ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
26 Oct 2006 08:22:53 PM |
|
|
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in
news:4qbrhlFl6rvfU1@individual.net:
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:na50k2d8pieu5f2tkp6vcjprsdca3upa83@4ax.com...
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:57:21 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <4q951iFj2fctU1@individual.net>
"Doc Smartass" <gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9865C9C2083D0askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in
news:4q418hFl5e9uU1@individual.net:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161484104.805643.39650@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for
Christians I added the atheists only becasue they assume in many
cases Christians think God in Omni-benevolent.
Considering YOU added in the atheists, then perhaps you should
stop whining about the responses you receive. Idiot.
BTW, what makes you qualified to speak for your god?
*****--I just realized that this nutbar is in Florida. Time ta
circle the wagons!
Uh oh! Oh well, Jabbers is in NJ. I don't find that very
comforting. But
he does live in the shittiest city in the state (once voted the
shittiest city in the entire country) and far away from my neck of
the woods.
Has it ever occuirred to you that jabriol residing there is the
DIRECT CAUSE of the shittiness of said environs?
LOL! Somehow I doubt that. I went to Camden, NJ once to go to the
aquarium. Not only was the aquarium a total ***** hole, but the town
itself looked like a bomb hit it.
Probably a gang of renegade ocean biologists ***** at the poor-
quality aquarium.
--
Doc Smartass
The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of
words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the
people who must use the words. - Philip K. *****
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
26 Oct 2006 07:12:14 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:33:40 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in alt.atheism
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:na50k2d8pieu5f2tkp6vcjprsdca3upa83@4ax.com...
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:57:21 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <4q951iFj2fctU1@individual.net>
"Doc Smartass" <gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9865C9C2083D0askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in
news:4q418hFl5e9uU1@individual.net:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161484104.805643.39650@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for Christians I
added the atheists only becasue they assume in many cases Christians
think God in Omni-benevolent.
Considering YOU added in the atheists, then perhaps you should stop
whining about the responses you receive. Idiot.
BTW, what makes you qualified to speak for your god?
*****--I just realized that this nutbar is in Florida. Time ta circle the
wagons!
Uh oh! Oh well, Jabbers is in NJ. I don't find that very comforting.
But
he does live in the shittiest city in the state (once voted the shittiest
city in the entire country) and far away from my neck of the woods.
Has it ever occuirred to you that jabriol residing there is the DIRECT
CAUSE of the shittiness of said environs?
LOL! Somehow I doubt that. I went to Camden, NJ once to go to the
aquarium. Not only was the aquarium a total ***** hole, but the town itself
looked like a bomb hit it.
And that was when it was spruced up!
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
26 Oct 2006 08:44:18 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:33:40 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <4qbrhlFl6rvfU1@individual.net>
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:na50k2d8pieu5f2tkp6vcjprsdca3upa83@4ax.com...
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:57:21 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <4q951iFj2fctU1@individual.net>
"Doc Smartass" <gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9865C9C2083D0askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in
news:4q418hFl5e9uU1@individual.net:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161484104.805643.39650@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for Christians I
added the atheists only becasue they assume in many cases Christians
think God in Omni-benevolent.
Considering YOU added in the atheists, then perhaps you should stop
whining about the responses you receive. Idiot.
BTW, what makes you qualified to speak for your god?
*****--I just realized that this nutbar is in Florida. Time ta circle the
wagons!
Uh oh! Oh well, Jabbers is in NJ. I don't find that very comforting.
But
he does live in the shittiest city in the state (once voted the shittiest
city in the entire country) and far away from my neck of the woods.
Has it ever occuirred to you that jabriol residing there is the DIRECT
CAUSE of the shittiness of said environs?
LOL! Somehow I doubt that. I went to Camden, NJ once to go to the
aquarium. Not only was the aquarium a total ***** hole, but the town itself
looked like a bomb hit it.
Jabbers works in mysterious ways...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
25 Oct 2006 10:25:16 PM |
|
|
Michael Gray <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in
news:na50k2d8pieu5f2tkp6vcjprsdca3upa83@4ax.com:
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:57:21 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <4q951iFj2fctU1@individual.net>
"Doc Smartass" <gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9865C9C2083D0askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in
news:4q418hFl5e9uU1@individual.net:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161484104.805643.39650@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for
Christians I added the atheists only becasue they assume in many
cases Christians think God in Omni-benevolent.
Considering YOU added in the atheists, then perhaps you should stop
whining about the responses you receive. Idiot.
BTW, what makes you qualified to speak for your god?
*****--I just realized that this nutbar is in Florida. Time ta circle
the wagons!
Uh oh! Oh well, Jabbers is in NJ. I don't find that very comforting.
But he does live in the shittiest city in the state (once voted the
shittiest city in the entire country) and far away from my neck of the
woods.
Has it ever occuirred to you that jabriol residing there is the DIRECT
CAUSE of the shittiness of said environs?
The First Cause!!
--
Doc Smartass
The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of
words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the
people who must use the words. - Philip K. *****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
26 Oct 2006 04:44:42 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:25:16 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <Xns9867E41D835D5askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18>
Michael Gray <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in
news:na50k2d8pieu5f2tkp6vcjprsdca3upa83@4ax.com:
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:57:21 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
- Refer: <4q951iFj2fctU1@individual.net>
"Doc Smartass" <gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9865C9C2083D0askifyouwantit@216.77.188.18...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in
news:4q418hFl5e9uU1@individual.net:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161484104.805643.39650@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for
Christians I added the atheists only becasue they assume in many
cases Christians think God in Omni-benevolent.
Considering YOU added in the atheists, then perhaps you should stop
whining about the responses you receive. Idiot.
BTW, what makes you qualified to speak for your god?
*****--I just realized that this nutbar is in Florida. Time ta circle
the wagons!
Uh oh! Oh well, Jabbers is in NJ. I don't find that very comforting.
But he does live in the shittiest city in the state (once voted the
shittiest city in the entire country) and far away from my neck of the
woods.
Has it ever occuirred to you that jabriol residing there is the DIRECT
CAUSE of the shittiness of said environs?
The First Cause!!
The LOST cause.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Samuel W. Heywood" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
26 Oct 2006 09:31:13 AM |
|
|
We should not expect God to be omni-benevolent
because God is not a Republican.
Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
26 Oct 2006 07:14:42 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:31:13 -0400, "Samuel W. Heywood"
<sheywood@MyRealBox.com> wrote in alt.atheism
We should not expect God to be omni-benevolent
because God is not a Republican.
Rethugnicans are omni incompetant traitorous drooling arseholes like
yourself.
Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
26 Oct 2006 07:07:59 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:49:49 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> wrote in alt.atheism
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in
news:4q418hFl5e9uU1@individual.net:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161484104.805643.39650@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for Christians I
added the atheists only becasue they assume in many cases Christians
think God in Omni-benevolent.
Considering YOU added in the atheists, then perhaps you should stop
whining about the responses you receive. Idiot.
BTW, what makes you qualified to speak for your god?
*****--I just realized that this nutbar is in Florida. Time ta circle the
wagons!
Lots of mindless broodmare nutcases in Florida.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Greywolf" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
21 Oct 2006 11:02:34 PM |
|
|
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161484104.805643.39650@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for Christians I
added the atheists only becasue they assume in many cases Christians
think God in Omni-benevolent.
So do my observations remain any less true? Does 'God' become any more
'real' when discussing 'It' in a 'Christian' NG?
As for the Ten Plagues it would not be the first time a people rewrote
their history to cover up things they did not want the world to
remember.
There *is* the possibility the possibility of the 'Ten Plagues' being as
bogus as Mt. 27:50-53, is there not?
Its quite possible the Egyptains refused to acknowledge the
wrath of God and the Hebrew peoples did.
It's also quite possible that most of the stuff is phony-baloney too.
One kept no recorded evidence
and the other did its called the Book of the Exodus.
But face it even if you did find a record a tomb with the story, a
pillar of hieroglyphics or some other evidence you would refute it.
Not necessarily. It depends on how authentic the 'evidence' is. That,
however, doesn't mean what was recorded is actually true. If it records
events that are patently ridiculous -- like people flapping their arms and
are able to fly, I'm not going to believe it. And neither should you! You
should use your head.
Atheists would deny any solid evidence a miracle occured.
Standing atheist challenge: Put an amputee in front of us, have all you
Jesus people pray fervently, in unison, and with the utmost sincerity and
intense devoutness mere mortals can muster; and cause that amputated limb be
restored 'miraculously'. If you Jesus people can do that, you'd have
countless atheists throw their disbelief into a cesspool and change their
'wayward' ways. If you can't 'coax' your 'God' to do something so
'positive', he either isn't worth two drops of my *****, or he doesn't exist.
If you're going to say 'He' is out there somewhere, it's up to you to prove
it. You shouldn't expect us atheists to believe -- let alone worship and
adore -- something as despicable as the biblical 'God' because it'll make us
feel all warm and 'fuzzy'. He's absolutely putrid; a bowl of snots; dog
diahrrea -- on a hotdog bun. Oh. I *really* meant to say, 'make-believe'.
If he exists, why don't you tell us atheists how we could possibly detect
him? A flashlight or a mass spectrometer? By moonlight or a software
program?
Greywolf
Greywolf wrote:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161474063.524245.100180@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
There is a misconception among Atheists and some Christians God is not
Omni-benevolent as in all good and mercieful. I'll clearly accept the
OT accounts and the Revelation as evidence to this God shows mercy ONLY
to those He deems worthy and who accept Him as their Lord. Being bathed
in the redeeming blood of Jesus His beloved Son that sacrificed His
life for mankinds sin will wash away our evil. To those that could not
know the Law of God such as pagans unaware of the Judeo-Christian
concepts and later of jesus they will be judged fairly according to the
Natural Light of Understanding in the conscience of men. Their works
and deeds tempered by Gods mercy will be the weight of their Judgement.
But to others God is the Final Judge and often poured out His wrath on
humanity through use of His power directly (10 Plagues of Egypt),
through actions of His servants on Earth or through nature. He may test
us with trials such as Job or by allowing bad things to happen to the
Christian. But the world is better off right now His hand is held back
as God protects His people by restraining His wrath. In the Revelation
after the Anti-Christ is revealed God will lift His protection and
Satan will be allowed to work then God will unleash the Final
Judgements upon all the world. Does that sound like a benevolent God?
It doesn't to me either so God is not all benevolent.
But God is God and as the creator of all we only must worship Him and
honor Him, we serve God and God does not serve us. And for those too
proud to accept that then the wrath poured out upon your heads will be
earned by your treachery in failing to accept God as your Master.
Do you want me to puke in this NG or wait until I get offline?
Are you for real? Where in the hell is your head, girl? In the toilet?
You
have absolutely NO proof for the drivel you're espousing. And you're
suggesting that we all grovel for a 'God' that isn't worth two teaspoons
of
my ***** on *top* of it! You are goofy.
Okay, okay. Maybe I'm being a little to melodramatic here. But what in
the
world would want you to worship and 'honor' his God-ness for? He's an
immoral jerk of the first order. He is not worth groveling for. But more
importantly: He doesn't exist, little lady.
I will say this for Mr. 'I'm As Imaginary As You Can Possibly Get': He's
a
first-rate imaginary actor! His pretending to be non-existent is
absolutely
scintillating! Bravo! He sure has *me* convinced. Now why don't you ask
Laurence Olivier, Jr. to step forward and take some bows? What? He can't
do
that? Well, why not? Is he still immersed in his role, or is he also a
part-time 'magician' makes himself disappear? Wait a minute! He isn't
*really* imaginary and non-existent now, is he?
'We serve 'God' and 'God' does not serve us.' What? Were you smokin' some
of
that wacky-tabbacky when you composed your little ditty? Ugh! I better
move
on to another post. My stomach is feeling mighty queasy at the moment.
This
groveling for an imaginary, sadistic and malevolent non-existent deity on
the part of a brainwashed brainwasher makes me nauseous.
Greywolf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lucifer" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
21 Oct 2006 11:54:35 PM |
|
|
Kate wrote:
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for Christians I
added the atheists only becasue they assume in many cases Christians
think God in Omni-benevolent.
As for the Ten Plagues it would not be the first time a people rewrote
their history to cover up things they did not want the world to
remember. Its quite possible the Egyptains refused to acknowledge the
wrath of God and the Hebrew peoples did. One kept no recorded evidence
and the other did its called the Book of the Exodus.
But face it even if you did find a record a tomb with the story, a
pillar of hieroglyphics or some other evidence you would refute it.
Atheists would deny any solid evidence a miracle occured.
Why don't you try to provide some, then perhaps we can have a crack at
it, until then, ***** off.
--
Lucifer, EAC Librarian of Dark Tomes of Excessive Evil and General
Purpose Igor
The Anti-Theist
"Don't worry, I won't bite.......hard"
Greywolf wrote:
"Kate" <katecoleman_fl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1161474063.524245.100180@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
There is a misconception among Atheists and some Christians God is not
Omni-benevolent as in all good and mercieful. I'll clearly accept the
OT accounts and the Revelation as evidence to this God shows mercy ONLY
to those He deems worthy and who accept Him as their Lord. Being bathed
in the redeeming blood of Jesus His beloved Son that sacrificed His
life for mankinds sin will wash away our evil. To those that could not
know the Law of God such as pagans unaware of the Judeo-Christian
concepts and later of jesus they will be judged fairly according to the
Natural Light of Understanding in the conscience of men. Their works
and deeds tempered by Gods mercy will be the weight of their Judgement.
But to others God is the Final Judge and often poured out His wrath on
humanity through use of His power directly (10 Plagues of Egypt),
through actions of His servants on Earth or through nature. He may test
us with trials such as Job or by allowing bad things to happen to the
Christian. But the world is better off right now His hand is held back
as God protects His people by restraining His wrath. In the Revelation
after the Anti-Christ is revealed God will lift His protection and
Satan will be allowed to work then God will unleash the Final
Judgements upon all the world. Does that sound like a benevolent God?
It doesn't to me either so God is not all benevolent.
But God is God and as the creator of all we only must worship Him and
honor Him, we serve God and God does not serve us. And for those too
proud to accept that then the wrath poured out upon your heads will be
earned by your treachery in failing to accept God as your Master.
Do you want me to puke in this NG or wait until I get offline?
Are you for real? Where in the hell is your head, girl? In the toilet? You
have absolutely NO proof for the drivel you're espousing. And you're
suggesting that we all grovel for a 'God' that isn't worth two teaspoons of
my ***** on *top* of it! You are goofy.
Okay, okay. Maybe I'm being a little to melodramatic here. But what in the
world would want you to worship and 'honor' his God-ness for? He's an
immoral jerk of the first order. He is not worth groveling for. But more
importantly: He doesn't exist, little lady.
I will say this for Mr. 'I'm As Imaginary As You Can Possibly Get': He's a
first-rate imaginary actor! His pretending to be non-existent is absolutely
scintillating! Bravo! He sure has *me* convinced. Now why don't you ask
Laurence Olivier, Jr. to step forward and take some bows? What? He can't do
that? Well, why not? Is he still immersed in his role, or is he also a
part-time 'magician' makes himself disappear? Wait a minute! He isn't
*really* imaginary and non-existent now, is he?
'We serve 'God' and 'God' does not serve us.' What? Were you smokin' some of
that wacky-tabbacky when you composed your little ditty? Ugh! I better move
on to another post. My stomach is feeling mighty queasy at the moment. This
groveling for an imaginary, sadistic and malevolent non-existent deity on
the part of a brainwashed brainwasher makes me nauseous.
Greywolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: God is NOT Omni-benevolent |
26 Oct 2006 07:06:56 PM |
|
|
On 21 Oct 2006 21:54:35 -0700, "Lucifer" <wyrdology@hotmail.com> wrote
in alt.atheism
Kate wrote:
Excuse me I did post this mainly ona site SUPPOSEDLY for Christians I
added the atheists only becasue they assume in many cases Christians
think God in Omni-benevolent.
As for the Ten Pla | | | | |
