| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Liberals Stink" |
| Date: |
21 Mar 2005 07:18:05 PM |
| Object: |
Godless liberal slander |
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George
Bush & the Republican congress as insincere &
hypocrites.
Even if liberals don't know Jesus, their lack of
shame surprises me.
It all centered on the Terri Schiavo case. She's the
woman in Florida the liberals want to murder just
because her brain doesn't work any more. Her
lower brain functions -- the part that controls
automatic functions like breathing & heartbeat --
are still functioning, but her higher brain functions
are toast.
I guess that means her cerebellum isn't damaged.
That's the oldest part of the brain, the part that
controls automatic functions.
Anyhow, the liberals are attacking our President and
his Republican controlled congress over the Terri
Schiavo case, smearing them with false charges.
You see, apparently the liberals caught wind of the
fact that, as governor of Texas, George Bush signed
allow saying it was okay to unplug people like
Terri Schiavo from their life support and/or feeding
tubes, and Bush's law has been used quite recently
(in the last few days) to snuff a little black baby
against the mother's wishes.
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=6541ef0b623784d4
http://jr-monsterfodder.dailykos.com/story/2005/3/19/213333/700
DON'T BELIEVE THE LIBERALS!
They're trying to spin this into a contradiction, make
it out like Bush & his congress are staging the whole
Terri Schiavo thing for political gain, that their not
really sincere.
KNOW THE FACTS!
Although the two cases appear similar they are not.
For example, the mother of the baby killed under
Bush's law couldn't afford to pay for all the medical
treatment, and couldn't find a medical facility willing
to take the baby under those circumstances. The baby
was also beyond hope -- like Terri Schiavo -- but
lack of hope wasn't enough. If the mother could have
paid then her baby wouldn't have been unplugged
against her wishes.
TERRI SCHIAVO'S MEDICAL BILLS ARE BEING PAID!
There is NO similarity between the two cases.
Trial lawyers got together with an activist judge
and awarded plenty of money that can be used to
pay for Terri Schiavo's medical bills. The money is
there, it might as well get spent.
LIBERAL CONTRADICTION
What the evil liberals won't tell you is that they're
against the kind of legal reforms which would have
stopped the trial lawyers from getting a fat judgement
in the first place. Democrats WANT people to be
able to sue when their loved ones are rendered
brain dead, yet they're AGAINST using that money
to keep them in a vegetative state against their wishes.
LIBERALS: MAKE UP YOUR MINDS!
Do you want people like Terri Schiavo to be put
to rest, granting her loved ones closure, or do you
want people to be able to sue over brain damage,
collecting enough money to pay for their medical
expenses?
You can't have it both ways, liberals.
.
|
|
| User: "Rally" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
22 Mar 2005 12:28:57 AM |
|
|
<snip>
I guess that means her cerebellum isn't damaged.
That's the oldest part of the brain, the part that
controls automatic functions.
<snip>
I like this part. Nice touch.
It admits evolution.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
22 Mar 2005 06:55:59 AM |
|
|
In article <AtCdncV4CcFjhqLfRVn-ig@comcast.com>,
"Liberals Stink" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George
Bush & the Republican congress as insincere &
hypocrites.
Because they are.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense,
founded on the Christian religion..."
Joel Barlow, Treaty of Tripoli (1796)
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
22 Mar 2005 10:20:09 AM |
|
|
johac wrote:
In article <AtCdncV4CcFjhqLfRVn-ig@comcast.com>,
"Liberals Stink" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George
Bush & the Republican congress as insincere &
hypocrites.
Because they are.
And here's our proof:
Load up two web browsers. In one, put the text of "Terri's Law", signed
by President George W. Bush. (Text here: http://tinyurl.com/6e838 )
In the other, put the text of the "Texas Futile Care Law", signed by
Governor George W. Bush. (Text here: http://tinyurl.com/6aufu )
Now, just read. You'll see that the Texas Futile Care Law states that
you can remove someone from life support if there is an inability to pay
for it. The first victim of TFCL? A 6-month old boy who had dwarfism.
The mother could not afford to keep him on life support, so the
doctors, under the TFCL, disconnected him. He took a few unassisted
breaths, then died.
Bush: Hypocritical Inscincere Flip-Flopper.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
22 Mar 2005 10:33:55 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:20:09 -0800 in alt.atheism, DanielSan
(DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism
johac wrote:
In article <AtCdncV4CcFjhqLfRVn-ig@comcast.com>,
"Liberals Stink" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George
Bush & the Republican congress as insincere &
hypocrites.
Because they are.
And here's our proof:
Load up two web browsers. In one, put the text of "Terri's Law", signed
by President George W. Bush. (Text here: http://tinyurl.com/6e838 )
In the other, put the text of the "Texas Futile Care Law", signed by
Governor George W. Bush. (Text here: http://tinyurl.com/6aufu )
Now, just read. You'll see that the Texas Futile Care Law states that
you can remove someone from life support if there is an inability to pay
for it. The first victim of TFCL? A 6-month old boy who had dwarfism.
The mother could not afford to keep him on life support, so the
doctors, under the TFCL, disconnected him. He took a few unassisted
breaths, then died.
Bush: Hypocritical Inscincere Flip-Flopper.
I was wondering about that. Life is sacred except where this may
result in a tax increase.
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
23 Mar 2005 06:58:45 AM |
|
|
In article <21tv319plq4a786fjn3p19kccnv548n806@4ax.com>,
Therion Ware <autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:20:09 -0800 in alt.atheism, DanielSan
(DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism
johac wrote:
In article <AtCdncV4CcFjhqLfRVn-ig@comcast.com>,
"Liberals Stink" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George
Bush & the Republican congress as insincere &
hypocrites.
Because they are.
And here's our proof:
Load up two web browsers. In one, put the text of "Terri's Law", signed
by President George W. Bush. (Text here: http://tinyurl.com/6e838 )
In the other, put the text of the "Texas Futile Care Law", signed by
Governor George W. Bush. (Text here: http://tinyurl.com/6aufu )
Now, just read. You'll see that the Texas Futile Care Law states that
you can remove someone from life support if there is an inability to pay
for it. The first victim of TFCL? A 6-month old boy who had dwarfism.
The mother could not afford to keep him on life support, so the
doctors, under the TFCL, disconnected him. He took a few unassisted
breaths, then died.
Bush: Hypocritical Inscincere Flip-Flopper.
I was wondering about that. Life is sacred except where this may
result in a tax increase.
Or if it brings in a lot of votes. On that note it's interesting to read
that many polls taken yesterday and today showed that the public
opposed Congressional intervention in this case by a wide margin.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense,
founded on the Christian religion..."
Joel Barlow, Treaty of Tripoli (1796)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
23 Mar 2005 12:56:53 PM |
|
|
In our last episode <jhachm-6826E1.22584522032005@news.giganews.com>,
johac pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
In article <21tv319plq4a786fjn3p19kccnv548n806@4ax.com>,
Therion Ware <autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:20:09 -0800 in alt.atheism, DanielSan
(DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism
johac wrote:
In article <AtCdncV4CcFjhqLfRVn-ig@comcast.com>,
"Liberals Stink" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George Bush & the Republican
congress as insincere & hypocrites.
Because they are.
And here's our proof:
Load up two web browsers. In one, put the text of "Terri's Law",
signed by President George W. Bush. (Text here:
http://tinyurl.com/6e838 )
In the other, put the text of the "Texas Futile Care Law", signed by
Governor George W. Bush. (Text here: http://tinyurl.com/6aufu )
Now, just read. You'll see that the Texas Futile Care Law states that
you can remove someone from life support if there is an inability to
pay for it. The first victim of TFCL? A 6-month old boy who had
dwarfism.
The mother could not afford to keep him on life support, so the
doctors, under the TFCL, disconnected him. He took a few unassisted
breaths, then died.
Bush: Hypocritical Inscincere Flip-Flopper.
I was wondering about that. Life is sacred except where this may result
in a tax increase.
Or if it brings in a lot of votes. On that note it's interesting to read
that many polls taken yesterday and today showed that the public opposed
Congressional intervention in this case by a wide margin.
Yeah, this little stunt is backfiring pretty badly on the neos...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Group website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
24 Mar 2005 06:15:15 AM |
|
|
In article <mMWdnWffrpkI-tzfRVn-qA@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
In our last episode <jhachm-6826E1.22584522032005@news.giganews.com>,
johac pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
In article <21tv319plq4a786fjn3p19kccnv548n806@4ax.com>,
Therion Ware <autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:20:09 -0800 in alt.atheism, DanielSan
(DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism
johac wrote:
In article <AtCdncV4CcFjhqLfRVn-ig@comcast.com>,
"Liberals Stink" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George Bush & the Republican
congress as insincere & hypocrites.
Because they are.
And here's our proof:
Load up two web browsers. In one, put the text of "Terri's Law",
signed by President George W. Bush. (Text here:
http://tinyurl.com/6e838 )
In the other, put the text of the "Texas Futile Care Law", signed by
Governor George W. Bush. (Text here: http://tinyurl.com/6aufu )
Now, just read. You'll see that the Texas Futile Care Law states that
you can remove someone from life support if there is an inability to
pay for it. The first victim of TFCL? A 6-month old boy who had
dwarfism.
The mother could not afford to keep him on life support, so the
doctors, under the TFCL, disconnected him. He took a few unassisted
breaths, then died.
Bush: Hypocritical Inscincere Flip-Flopper.
I was wondering about that. Life is sacred except where this may result
in a tax increase.
Or if it brings in a lot of votes. On that note it's interesting to read
that many polls taken yesterday and today showed that the public opposed
Congressional intervention in this case by a wide margin.
Yeah, this little stunt is backfiring pretty badly on the neos...
Many of the old fashioned Conservatives oppose it too. I think that it's
finally becoming evident that these guys are so far out of the
mainstream that hopefully they will never get let back in.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense,
founded on the Christian religion..."
Joel Barlow, Treaty of Tripoli (1796)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
25 Mar 2005 01:46:16 PM |
|
|
In our last episode <jhachm-24392C.22151523032005@news.giganews.com>,
johac pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
In article <mMWdnWffrpkI-tzfRVn-qA@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
In our last episode <jhachm-6826E1.22584522032005@news.giganews.com>,
johac pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
In article <21tv319plq4a786fjn3p19kccnv548n806@4ax.com>,
Therion Ware <autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:20:09 -0800 in alt.atheism, DanielSan
(DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism
johac wrote:
In article <AtCdncV4CcFjhqLfRVn-ig@comcast.com>,
"Liberals Stink" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George Bush & the
Republican congress as insincere & hypocrites.
Because they are.
And here's our proof:
Load up two web browsers. In one, put the text of "Terri's Law",
signed by President George W. Bush. (Text here:
http://tinyurl.com/6e838 )
In the other, put the text of the "Texas Futile Care Law", signed by
Governor George W. Bush. (Text here: http://tinyurl.com/6aufu )
Now, just read. You'll see that the Texas Futile Care Law states
that you can remove someone from life support if there is an
inability to pay for it. The first victim of TFCL? A 6-month old
boy who had dwarfism.
The mother could not afford to keep him on life support, so the
doctors, under the TFCL, disconnected him. He took a few unassisted
breaths, then died.
Bush: Hypocritical Inscincere Flip-Flopper.
I was wondering about that. Life is sacred except where this may
result in a tax increase.
Or if it brings in a lot of votes. On that note it's interesting to
read that many polls taken yesterday and today showed that the public
opposed Congressional intervention in this case by a wide margin.
Yeah, this little stunt is backfiring pretty badly on the neos...
Many of the old fashioned Conservatives oppose it too. I think that it's
finally becoming evident that these guys are so far out of the mainstream
that hopefully they will never get let back in.
One of the more interesting things to come out of this is that a majority
of *evangelicals oppose Congress and the President on this...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Group website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
24 Mar 2005 03:38:23 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:15:15 -0800, johac wrote:
In article <mMWdnWffrpkI-tzfRVn-qA@megapath.net>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
In our last episode <jhachm-6826E1.22584522032005@news.giganews.com>,
johac pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
In article <21tv319plq4a786fjn3p19kccnv548n806@4ax.com>,
Therion Ware <autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:20:09 -0800 in alt.atheism, DanielSan
(DanielSan <daniel-san@myrealbox.com>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism
johac wrote:
In article <AtCdncV4CcFjhqLfRVn-ig@comcast.com>,
"Liberals Stink" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George Bush & the
Republican congress as insincere & hypocrites.
Because they are.
And here's our proof:
Load up two web browsers. In one, put the text of "Terri's Law",
signed by President George W. Bush. (Text here:
http://tinyurl.com/6e838 )
In the other, put the text of the "Texas Futile Care Law", signed by
Governor George W. Bush. (Text here: http://tinyurl.com/6aufu )
Now, just read. You'll see that the Texas Futile Care Law states
that you can remove someone from life support if there is an
inability to pay for it. The first victim of TFCL? A 6-month old
boy who had dwarfism.
The mother could not afford to keep him on life support, so the
doctors, under the TFCL, disconnected him. He took a few unassisted
breaths, then died.
Bush: Hypocritical Inscincere Flip-Flopper.
I was wondering about that. Life is sacred except where this may
result in a tax increase.
Or if it brings in a lot of votes. On that note it's interesting to
read that many polls taken yesterday and today showed that the public
opposed Congressional intervention in this case by a wide margin.
Yeah, this little stunt is backfiring pretty badly on the neos...
Many of the old fashioned Conservatives oppose it too. I think that it's
finally becoming evident that these guys are so far out of the mainstream
that hopefully they will never get let back in.
"Damage report, Mr. Sulu!"
I desperately hope that the current trend of shameless manipulation of the
media will make people aware that they have to be more active in
evaluating sources of "news," and making sure that the "news report" is
not, in fact, a slick infomercial.
--
MarkA
(still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
23 Mar 2005 04:11:19 AM |
|
|
In our last episode <FMydnREPG6HObKLfRVn-vQ@comcast.com>, DanielSan
pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
johac wrote:
In article <AtCdncV4CcFjhqLfRVn-ig@comcast.com>,
"Liberals Stink" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George Bush & the Republican
congress as insincere & hypocrites.
Because they are.
And here's our proof:
Load up two web browsers. In one, put the text of "Terri's Law", signed
by President George W. Bush. (Text here: http://tinyurl.com/6e838 )
In the other, put the text of the "Texas Futile Care Law", signed by
Governor George W. Bush. (Text here: http://tinyurl.com/6aufu )
Now, just read. You'll see that the Texas Futile Care Law states that you
can remove someone from life support if there is an inability to pay for
it. The first victim of TFCL? A 6-month old boy who had dwarfism.
The mother could not afford to keep him on life support, so the
doctors, under the TFCL, disconnected him. He took a few unassisted
breaths, then died.
Well, yeah, but they were out of money!
Sheesh. Let's keep our priorities straight here!
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Group website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
22 Mar 2005 01:44:25 AM |
|
|
In our last episode <AtCdncV4CcFjhqLfRVn-ig@comcast.com>, Liberals Stink
pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
Although the two cases appear similar they are not. For example, the
mother of the baby killed under Bush's law couldn't afford to pay for all
the medical treatment,
Oh well *that makes all the difference, she didn't have enough *cash...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Group website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
21 Mar 2005 11:14:25 PM |
|
|
In our last episode <AtCdncV4CcFjhqLfRVn-ig@comcast.com>, Liberals Stink
pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
TERRI SCHIAVO'S MEDICAL BILLS ARE BEING PAID!
There is NO similarity between the two cases. Trial lawyers got together
with an activist judge and awarded plenty of money that can be used to pay
for Terri Schiavo's medical bills. The money is there, it might as well
get spent.
It was. It's almost gone now. This has been going on for years.
LIBERAL CONTRADICTION
What the evil liberals won't tell you is that they're against the kind of
legal reforms which would have stopped the trial lawyers from getting a
fat judgement in the first place.
So they would have had to pull the plug years ago? Make up your mind.
Democrats WANT people to be able to sue
when their loved ones are rendered brain dead, yet they're AGAINST using
that money to keep them in a vegetative state against their wishes.
Nobody "keeps" people in a vegetative state. Sheesh.
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Group website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger
.
|
|
|
| User: "curtsybear" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
22 Mar 2005 02:29:30 PM |
|
|
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.politics.homosexuality.]
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:14:25 -0600, Mark K. Bilbo <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
In our last episode <AtCdncV4CcFjhqLfRVn-ig@comcast.com>, Liberals Stink
pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:
TERRI SCHIAVO'S MEDICAL BILLS ARE BEING PAID!
There is NO similarity between the two cases. Trial lawyers got together
with an activist judge and awarded plenty of money that can be used to pay
for Terri Schiavo's medical bills. The money is there, it might as well
get spent.
It was. It's almost gone now. This has been going on for years.
So all the husband has to do is get her transferred to a Texas
hospital and then Bush's "kill 'em if they can't pay the bill" law
will do the job, right? It'd be a good way to illustrate the irony
of the current federal activity.
--
He may look like an idiot, and he may sound like an idiot, but don't let
him fool you. He really is an idiot. -- Groucho Marx
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Secular Fundamentalist" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
21 Mar 2005 07:48:48 PM |
|
|
Liberals Stink wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George
Bush & the Republican congress as insincere &
hypocrites.
Even if liberals don't know Jesus, their lack of
shame surprises me.
It all centered on the Terri Schiavo case. She's the
woman in Florida the liberals want to murder just
because her brain doesn't work any more. Her
lower brain functions -- the part that controls
automatic functions like breathing & heartbeat --
are still functioning, but her higher brain functions
are toast.
I guess that means her cerebellum isn't damaged.
That's the oldest part of the brain, the part that
controls automatic functions.
Anyhow, the liberals are attacking our President and
his Republican controlled congress over the Terri
Schiavo case, smearing them with false charges.
You see, apparently the liberals caught wind of the
fact that, as governor of Texas, George Bush signed
allow saying it was okay to unplug people like
Terri Schiavo from their life support and/or feeding
tubes, and Bush's law has been used quite recently
(in the last few days) to snuff a little black baby
against the mother's wishes.
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=6541ef0b623784d4
http://jr-monsterfodder.dailykos.com/story/2005/3/19/213333/700
DON'T BELIEVE THE LIBERALS!
They're trying to spin this into a contradiction, make
it out like Bush & his congress are staging the whole
Terri Schiavo thing for political gain, that their not
really sincere.
KNOW THE FACTS!
Although the two cases appear similar they are not.
For example, the mother of the baby killed under
Bush's law couldn't afford to pay for all the medical
treatment, and couldn't find a medical facility willing
to take the baby under those circumstances. The baby
was also beyond hope -- like Terri Schiavo -- but
lack of hope wasn't enough. If the mother could have
paid then her baby wouldn't have been unplugged
against her wishes.
TERRI SCHIAVO'S MEDICAL BILLS ARE BEING PAID!
There is NO similarity between the two cases.
Trial lawyers got together with an activist judge
and awarded plenty of money that can be used to
pay for Terri Schiavo's medical bills. The money is
there, it might as well get spent.
LIBERAL CONTRADICTION
What the evil liberals won't tell you is that they're
against the kind of legal reforms which would have
stopped the trial lawyers from getting a fat judgement
in the first place. Democrats WANT people to be
able to sue when their loved ones are rendered
brain dead, yet they're AGAINST using that money
to keep them in a vegetative state against their wishes.
LIBERALS: MAKE UP YOUR MINDS!
Do you want people like Terri Schiavo to be put
to rest, granting her loved ones closure, or do you
want people to be able to sue over brain damage,
collecting enough money to pay for their medical
expenses?
You can't have it both ways, liberals.
It's a good job that reading the heading of this thread made me unplug
my irony-o-meter. Which one of you a.a. regulars wrote this?
--
David Silverman F.L.A.H.N.
aa #2208
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
21 Mar 2005 11:36:06 PM |
|
|
"Secular Fundamentalist" <mr.mcgregor@answersinpeterrabbit.com> wrote in
message news:IZednWqSfdm8uKLfRVnygg@brightview.com...
Liberals Stink wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George
Bush & the Republican congress as insincere &
hypocrites.
That isn't a smear. It is stating the facts of the matter.
Even if liberals don't know Jesus, their lack of
shame surprises me.
Some Liberals are Christians, whether you like it or not.
The fact that you don't seem to think they are entitled to
their own opinions is shameful for you, not them.
It all centered on the Terri Schiavo case. She's the
woman in Florida the liberals want to murder just
because her brain doesn't work any more. Her
lower brain functions -- the part that controls
automatic functions like breathing & heartbeat --
are still functioning, but her higher brain functions
are toast.
Parts of Terri's brain no longer exist. This has been
proven. She will never awaken. There is no mind left.
I guess that means her cerebellum isn't damaged.
That's the oldest part of the brain, the part that
controls automatic functions.
Anyhow, the liberals are attacking our President and
his Republican controlled congress over the Terri
Schiavo case, smearing them with false charges.
Bush should keep his ultra-religious nose out of other people's
business. He shouldn't be involved in this at all.
You see, apparently the liberals caught wind of the
fact that, as governor of Texas, George Bush signed
allow saying it was okay to unplug people like
Terri Schiavo from their life support and/or feeding
tubes, and Bush's law has been used quite recently
(in the last few days) to snuff a little black baby
against the mother's wishes.
Your use of the word 'snuff' shows us exactly where you
stand on this matter. The baby had no chance of a normal
life. If he had lived, he would have suffered horribly until
he died. And, you would wish this on a infant? Though I
get the impression that you wouldn't care, since the baby
was black.
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=6541ef0b623784d4
http://jr-monsterfodder.dailykos.com/story/2005/3/19/213333/700
DON'T BELIEVE THE LIBERALS!
Why should anyone believe a whack job like you so
obviously are?
They're trying to spin this into a contradiction, make
it out like Bush & his congress are staging the whole
Terri Schiavo thing for political gain, that their not
really sincere.
Of course, they are doing this for political gain. And, fools
like you may allow him to get away with this. Bush doesn't
know the meaning of the word 'sincere'. His entire record
is proof of this.
KNOW THE FACTS!
Although the two cases appear similar they are not.
For example, the mother of the baby killed under
Bush's law couldn't afford to pay for all the medical
treatment, and couldn't find a medical facility willing
to take the baby under those circumstances. The baby
was also beyond hope -- like Terri Schiavo -- but
lack of hope wasn't enough. If the mother could have
paid then her baby wouldn't have been unplugged
against her wishes.
I doubt that. Who with any kind of humanity would have
wished that kind of suffering on an infant?
TERRI SCHIAVO'S MEDICAL BILLS ARE BEING PAID!
There is NO similarity between the two cases.
Trial lawyers got together with an activist judge
and awarded plenty of money that can be used to
pay for Terri Schiavo's medical bills. The money is
there, it might as well get spent.
The money from the settlement has been spent. Michael saw to it
that it was all spent to take care of Terri. None of it went to her
parents who wanted a piece of the action.
LIBERAL CONTRADICTION
What the evil liberals won't tell you is that they're
against the kind of legal reforms which would have
stopped the trial lawyers from getting a fat judgement
in the first place. Democrats WANT people to be
able to sue when their loved ones are rendered
brain dead, yet they're AGAINST using that money
to keep them in a vegetative state against their wishes.
Terri did not want to be kept in a vegetative state. Why
don't you try reading the court papers before showing
your ignorance?
I'm not concerned with the damned lawyers. I'm
concerned with Terri and what she wanted.
LIBERALS: MAKE UP YOUR MINDS!
Do you want people like Terri Schiavo to be put
to rest, granting her loved ones closure, or do you
want people to be able to sue over brain damage,
collecting enough money to pay for their medical
expenses?
Her parents don't want to put her to rest. Her husband is
trying to follow her wishes.
You can't have it both ways, liberals.
You can't just have it your way, ignorant ultra-conservative.
It's a good job that reading the heading of this thread made me unplug
my irony-o-meter. Which one of you a.a. regulars wrote this?
This jackass has been sending messages to alt.atheism ever since the
Presidential ...er... what can we call it? It certainly wasn't an election.
--
David Silverman F.L.A.H.N.
aa #2208
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jesus saves!" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
23 Mar 2005 05:12:38 AM |
|
|
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote
Some Liberals are Christians, whether you like it or not.
A Christian wouldn't yank a baby out of the womb with a
coat hanger, sacrificing a human life to Baal.
A Christian wouldn't engage in filthy homosexual sex with
500 different underage boys a year.
A Christian knows that if he has a job he can thank a rich
person, and certainly would never dream of raising taxes
on the people he's indebted to.
A Christian could never support pay-as-you-go Social
Security, or socialized medicine.
A Christian would never allow a brain-dead patient to
die, not when they can still pay their medical bills.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woden" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
23 Mar 2005 12:40:33 PM |
|
|
"Jesus saves!" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in news:l8ydnZygYc1JZd3fRVn-
2Q@comcast.com:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote
Some Liberals are Christians, whether you like it or not.
A Christian wouldn't yank a baby out of the womb with a
coat hanger, sacrificing a human life to Baal.
A Christian wouldn't engage in filthy homosexual sex with
500 different underage boys a year.
A Christian knows that if he has a job he can thank a rich
person, and certainly would never dream of raising taxes
on the people he's indebted to.
A Christian could never support pay-as-you-go Social
Security, or socialized medicine.
A Christian would never allow a brain-dead patient to
die, not when they can still pay their medical bills.
I'm still trying to figure out if this is good parody or true idiocy?
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political system for controlling people's thoughts,
lives and actions based on ancient myths and superstitions, perpetrated
through generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ninure Saunders" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
23 Mar 2005 02:35:02 PM |
|
|
In article <l8ydnZygYc1JZd3fRVn-2Q@comcast.com>, "Jesus saves!"
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
-
-A Christian would never allow a brain-dead patient to
-die, not when they can still pay their medical bills.
So you agree with conservatives that that its OK to let a patient die if
they CABBOT pay their medical bills as is the case (by law) in Texas?
Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
The Lord is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://Ninure-Saunders.tk
Take my polls
http://ninure.100megsfree5.com
My Yahoo Group
http://Ninure.tk
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.MCCchurch.org
The Bible Site - help provide free scripture
http://www.thebiblesite.org
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jesus saves!" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
23 Mar 2005 06:24:16 PM |
|
|
"Ninure Saunders" <RainbowChristiannohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk> wrote
-A Christian would never allow a brain-dead patient to
-die, not when they can still pay their medical bills.
So you agree with conservatives that that its OK to let a patient
die if they CABBOT pay their medical bills as is the case
(by law) in Texas?
As displayed by your speaking in tongues, you obviously have
been touched by God, the truth revealed to you as He would
have it.
Usury is a sin, for both parties. Better that you should watch your
child & mother die -- knowing that their lack of sin ensures them
a place in Heaven -- than condemn their souls with medical debts.
Jesus loves them so that he has saw to it that they are poor,
unable to pay for medical care, ensuring a swift arrival at his
side. Are we to interfere with this divine gift, come between
the love of Jesus and the poor?
That's blasphamous!
As one so touched by God, surely you must see the wickedness
in those who would not deny medical care to those who ask for
it yet can't afford it.
Peace.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory Gadow" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
21 Mar 2005 08:06:11 PM |
|
|
Liberals Stink wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George
Bush & the Republican congress as insincere &
hypocrites.
It's not a smear when it's true.
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"[T]hose who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves;
and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it."
-- Pres. George W. Bush, Hypocrite, his inauguration speech, 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "Atheists will burn" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
21 Mar 2005 08:18:44 PM |
|
|
"Gregory Gadow" <techbear@serv.net> wrote
Liberals Stink wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George
Bush & the Republican congress as insincere &
hypocrites.
It's not a smear when it's true.
Oh yeah? Well, nameless-faceless liberals are guilty
of unspecified crimes, so that excuses anything you
can document about Bush!
Now go hump a tree, you healthcare-loving liberal
you!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
21 Mar 2005 08:36:04 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:18:44 -0500, "Atheists will burn"
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Gregory Gadow" <techbear@serv.net> wrote
Liberals Stink wrote:
*ACTION ALERT*
Did you hear the latest?
Apparently the liberals are now smearing George
Bush & the Republican congress as insincere &
hypocrites.
It's not a smear when it's true.
Oh yeah? Well, nameless-faceless liberals are guilty
of unspecified crimes, so that excuses anything you
can document about Bush!
Now go hump a tree, you healthcare-loving liberal
you!
Nice try but you really don't sound deranged enough to be a real
neo-conservative troll.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jesus Lives!" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
21 Mar 2005 08:55:19 PM |
|
|
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote
Nice try but you really don't sound deranged enough
to be a real neo-conservative troll.
What, is that supposed to be a complement? I'm I
supposed to read that and then not want to see you
burn in agony for all eternity the way all you Godless,
liberal, feminist, homosexualist socialists deserve?
I've said it once and I'll say it a thousand times:
You're either with private retirement accounts or
you're with the terrorists. And, Jesus HATES
terrorists.... almost as much as homos.
So despite you lame (liberal) attempt at winning
me over with a complement, I'm still going to
enjoy peering down from my place beside Jesus,
watching you suffering unending torment in Hell.
Peace.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Clockmeister" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
21 Mar 2005 10:13:03 PM |
|
|
"Jesus Lives!" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:yL2dnWXDHeBar6LfRVn-rg@comcast.com...
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote
Nice try but you really don't sound deranged enough
to be a real neo-conservative troll.
What, is that supposed to be a complement? I'm I
supposed to read that and then not want to see you
burn in agony for all eternity the way all you Godless,
liberal, feminist, homosexualist socialists deserve?
I've said it once and I'll say it a thousand times:
You're either with private retirement accounts or
you're with the terrorists. And, Jesus HATES
terrorists.... almost as much as homos.
There is no jesus.
So despite you lame (liberal) attempt at winning
me over with a complement, I'm still going to
enjoy peering down from my place beside Jesus,
watching you suffering unending torment in Hell.
Peace.
It's odd that the people crawling at gods feet are the redknecks. Must be
the guilt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
21 Mar 2005 10:18:34 PM |
|
|
Clockmeister <no-one@nowhere.com> wrote:
"Jesus Lives!" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:yL2dnWXDHeBar6LfRVn-rg@comcast.com...
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote
Nice try but you really don't sound deranged enough
to be a real neo-conservative troll.
What, is that supposed to be a complement? I'm I
supposed to read that and then not want to see you
burn in agony for all eternity the way all you Godless,
liberal, feminist, homosexualist socialists deserve?
I've said it once and I'll say it a thousand times:
You're either with private retirement accounts or
you're with the terrorists. And, Jesus HATES
terrorists.... almost as much as homos.
There is no jesus.
So despite you lame (liberal) attempt at winning
me over with a complement, I'm still going to
enjoy peering down from my place beside Jesus,
watching you suffering unending torment in Hell.
Peace.
It's odd that the people crawling at gods feet are the redknecks.
Must be the guilt.
I've been told by many of the Christers that they must believe in a God,
otherwise they could not find the moral reason to keep from all sorts of
henious acts, including murder, rape, etc. According to them, there is no
morality without a belief in a God they cannot prove exists. Generally,
it's no skin off my ***** what they believe; whatever gets them through the
day and all that, but I object when they try to force their arcane beliefs
on me.
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jesus saves!" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
23 Mar 2005 05:14:07 AM |
|
|
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote
I've been told by many of the Christers that they must believe
in a God, otherwise they could not find the moral reason to
keep from all sorts of henious acts, including murder, rape, etc.
And you have a problem with that?
Who needs a moral compass when we have God -- as represented
here on Earth by George Bush -- to guide us through life?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
23 Mar 2005 10:27:27 AM |
|
|
Jesus saves! <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote
I've been told by many of the Christers that they must believe
in a God, otherwise they could not find the moral reason to
keep from all sorts of henious acts, including murder, rape, etc.
And you have a problem with that?
Yes, you're all loons.
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
23 Mar 2005 06:22:03 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:14:07 -0500, "Jesus saves!"
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote
I've been told by many of the Christers that they must believe
in a God, otherwise they could not find the moral reason to
keep from all sorts of henious acts, including murder, rape, etc.
And you have a problem with that?
Who needs a moral compass when we have God -- as represented
here on Earth by George Bush -- to guide us through life?
Now if you could only get him to read it right side up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
23 Mar 2005 10:28:06 AM |
|
|
Kate <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:14:07 -0500, "Jesus saves!"
<gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES_4> wrote
I've been told by many of the Christers that they must believe
in a God, otherwise they could not find the moral reason to
keep from all sorts of henious acts, including murder, rape, etc.
And you have a problem with that?
Who needs a moral compass when we have God -- as represented
here on Earth by George Bush -- to guide us through life?
Now if you could only get him to read it right side up.
And to understand the words with more than one syllable.
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woden" |
|
| Title: Re: Godless liberal slander |
22 Mar 2005 04:43:54 AM |
|
|
"Jesus Lives!" <gymraven@hotmail.com> wrote in news:yL2dnWXDHeBar6LfRVn-
rg@comcast.com:
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote
Nice try but you really don't sound deranged enough
to be a real neo-conservative troll.
What, is that supposed to be a complement? I'm I
supposed to read that and then not want to see you
burn in agony for all eternity the way all you Godless,
liberal, feminist, homosexualist socialists deserve?
I've said it once and I'll say it a thousand times:
You're either with private retirement accounts or
you're with the terrorists. And, Jesus HATES
terrorists.... almost as much as homos.
So despite you lame (liberal) attempt at winning
me over with a complement, I'm still going to
enjoy peering down from my place beside Jesus,
watching you suffering unending torment in Hell.
Peace.
Well, I think that describes xianity better than anything I've heard.
That they would look forward with joy to the idea of watching a fellow
human tormented in eternal torture.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political system for controlling people's thoughts,
lives and actions based on ancient myths and superstitions, perpetrated
through generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
