| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
19 Nov 2005 10:09:35 AM |
| Object: |
Good news for churches meeting in schools |
Good news for churches meeting in schools
http://www.churchcentral.com/nw/s/template/Article.html/id/23865
ChurchCentral.com - Louisville,KY,USA
According to the New York Times, the city has long opposed using school
buildings for worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of
church and state. ...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
by Rebecca Barnes, editor 18 Nov 2005
The worship space wars in New York City have ended with a victory for the
Bronx Household of Faith that meets at Public School 15. According to the
New York Times, the city has long opposed using school buildings for
worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of church and state.
In fact, the same judge who ruled against the church meeting at a public
school in 1996, Judge Loretta A. Preska of Federal District Court in
Manhattan, reversed her ruling this week in accordance with a 2001 decision
by the Supreme Court, which found that religious teachings on school
premises were no different from other secular lessons about "morals and
character development."
The city attorney plans to appeal this ruling. But to the rest of the
country, Middle American, anyway, and to evangelical Christians in
particular, many of whom meet for church every week at public schools or
movie theaters, the 10 year battle for a small church in the Bronx appears
ludicrous.
Jordan Lorence, the congregation’s attorney, and senior counsel for The
Alliance Defense Fund, told WorldNetDaily, ""It's a simple, common sense
principle that took over a decade and multiple court rulings for the New
York City school board to understand," he said.
"Almost everyone in America but the public school system of New York City
understands that the government doesn't endorse everything it allows,"
Lorence also said.
The implications of the big victory for the small church may ripple across
to the West Coast where Rev. Ken Hutcherson has been battling for ground in
a public school where Antioch Bible Church now meets. Most recently he has
been targeted by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network. Members
of that group testified before the school board last month that having the
church in the building of Lake Washington High School interfered with the
school mission, according to GayWired.com.
But even in Middle America, the debate pitting church and state in the
public schools, has reverberated. One irate parent in Thedford, Neb., wants
a school superintendent there sacked because a church group is encouraging
students to join their congregation. According to The North Platte
Telegraph, an abstinence and drug-free program got way out of control for
young cornhuskers when they were given a free "Book of Hope" at school and
encouraged to come to church.
Forget about the peer pressure to drink, do drugs, smoke or have sex, the
peer pressure to worship God was way out of control. The board won’t fire
the superintendent, seems he was on his way out anyway, with retirement
plans at the end of the year.
*****************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.
|
|
| User: "ZenIsWhen" |
|
| Title: Re: Good news for churches meeting in schools |
19 Nov 2005 12:01:04 PM |
|
|
<buckeye-ELo@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:oeutn199u6q1huqn0v93cbhaaftcfd92pa@4ax.com...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
http://www.churchcentral.com/nw/s/template/Article.html/id/23865
ChurchCentral.com - Louisville,KY,USA
According to the New York Times, the city has long opposed using school
buildings for worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of
church and state. ...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
by Rebecca Barnes, editor 18 Nov 2005
The worship space wars in New York City have ended with a victory for the
Bronx Household of Faith that meets at Public School 15. According to the
New York Times, the city has long opposed using school buildings for
worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of church and state.
In fact, the same judge who ruled against the church meeting at a public
school in 1996, Judge Loretta A. Preska of Federal District Court in
Manhattan, reversed her ruling this week in accordance with a 2001
decision
by the Supreme Court, which found that religious teachings on school
premises were no different from other secular lessons about "morals and
character development."
Taching morals and character development has absolutely nothing in common
with worshiping an invented sky daddy!
The city attorney plans to appeal this ruling. But to the rest of the
country, Middle American, anyway, and to evangelical Christians in
particular, many of whom meet for church every week at public schools or
movie theaters, the 10 year battle for a small church in the Bronx appears
ludicrous.
Jordan Lorence, the congregation's attorney, and senior counsel for The
Alliance Defense Fund, told WorldNetDaily, ""It's a simple, common sense
principle that took over a decade and multiple court rulings for the New
York City school board to understand," he said.
"Almost everyone in America but the public school system of New York City
understands that the government doesn't endorse everything it allows,"
Lorence also said.
NAMBLA meetings every Thursday in room 227;
Klan meetings in room 102 on Fridays.
Rastifarian pot sales in the lobby all week.
The implications of the big victory for the small church may ripple across
to the West Coast where Rev. Ken Hutcherson has been battling for ground
in
a public school where Antioch Bible Church now meets. Most recently he has
been targeted by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network. Members
of that group testified before the school board last month that having the
church in the building of Lake Washington High School interfered with the
school mission, according to GayWired.com.
But even in Middle America, the debate pitting church and state in the
public schools, has reverberated. One irate parent in Thedford, Neb.,
wants
a school superintendent there sacked because a church group is encouraging
students to join their congregation. According to The North Platte
Telegraph, an abstinence and drug-free program got way out of control for
young cornhuskers when they were given a free "Book of Hope" at school and
encouraged to come to church.
THAT is outrageously illegal!
Forget about the peer pressure to drink, do drugs, smoke or have sex, the
peer pressure to worship God was way out of control. The board won't fire
the superintendent, seems he was on his way out anyway, with retirement
plans at the end of the year.
The minute ANY school has organized attempts, by a school official, to push
cigarette use, drug use, alcohol use or sex - you will let us know .......
won't you!?!?!?:
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Good news for churches meeting in schools |
19 Nov 2005 08:34:40 PM |
|
|
wrote...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
http://www.churchcentral.com/nw/s/template/Article.html/id/23865
ChurchCentral.com - Louisville,KY,USA
According to the New York Times, the city has long opposed using school
buildings for worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of
church and state. ...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
by Rebecca Barnes, editor 18 Nov 2005
The worship space wars in New York City have ended with a victory for the
Bronx Household of Faith that meets at Public School 15. According to the
New York Times, the city has long opposed using school buildings for
worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of church and state.
In fact, the same judge who ruled against the church meeting at a public
school in 1996, Judge Loretta A. Preska of Federal District Court in
Manhattan, reversed her ruling this week in accordance with a 2001 decision
by the Supreme Court, which found that religious teachings on school
premises were no different from other secular lessons about "morals and
character development."
Okay then, I am a follower of the teachings of Anton LaVey who founded
the Church of Satan and wrote the Satanic Bible. We don't worship him
or his teachings but consider them to be valuable philosophical
insights and they definitely play a role in our character development.
So by praising this decision, are you prepared to have a group of us
Satanists hold meetings in your local public school? And don't bother
to answer, I already know your response. You will be so outraged that
Satanists are using public property paid for with your tax money and
demand it be prohibited. Your religious group will still be permitted
to use that same school that my tax money also paid for.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"When a Satanist commits a wrong, he realizes that it is natural
to make a mistake - and if he is truly sorry about what he has
done, he will learn from it and take care not to do the same
thing again. If he is not honestly sorry about what he has done,
and knows he will do the same thing over and over, he has no
business confessing and asking forgiveness in the first place.
But this is exactly what happens. People confess their sins so
that they can clear their consciences - and be free to go out and
sin again, usually the same sin."
-- Anton LaVey; "The Satanic Bible"
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Good news for churches meeting in schools |
20 Nov 2005 04:07:34 PM |
|
|
John Smith <jsmith@nowhere.com> wrote:
:|buckeye-ELo@nospam.net wrote...
:|> Good news for churches meeting in schools
:|> http://www.churchcentral.com/nw/s/template/Article.html/id/23865
:|>
:|> ChurchCentral.com - Louisville,KY,USA
:|> According to the New York Times, the city has long opposed using school
:|> buildings for worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of
:|> church and state. ...
:|>
:|> Good news for churches meeting in schools
:|>
:|> by Rebecca Barnes, editor 18 Nov 2005
:|>
:|> The worship space wars in New York City have ended with a victory for the
:|> Bronx Household of Faith that meets at Public School 15. According to the
:|> New York Times, the city has long opposed using school buildings for
:|> worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of church and state.
:|> In fact, the same judge who ruled against the church meeting at a public
:|> school in 1996, Judge Loretta A. Preska of Federal District Court in
:|> Manhattan, reversed her ruling this week in accordance with a 2001 decision
:|> by the Supreme Court, which found that religious teachings on school
:|> premises were no different from other secular lessons about "morals and
:|> character development."
:|
:|Okay then, I am a follower of the teachings of Anton LaVey who founded
:|the Church of Satan and wrote the Satanic Bible. We don't worship him
:|or his teachings but consider them to be valuable philosophical
:|insights and they definitely play a role in our character development.
:|So by praising this decision, are you prepared to have a group of us
:|Satanists hold meetings in your local public school? And don't bother
:|to answer, I already know your response. You will be so outraged that
:|Satanists are using public property paid for with your tax money and
:|demand it be prohibited. Your religious group will still be permitted
:|to use that same school that my tax money also paid for.
:|
You do realize that the author of the article was Rebecca Barnes.
So when you add "your" as in the author, you need to be sending your
comments to her in care of the newspaper she works for
it is highly unlikely she will ever see your comments here.
*****************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Good news for churches meeting in schools |
20 Nov 2005 12:04:07 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:34:40 -0600, John Smith wrote:
buckeye-ELo@nospam.net wrote...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
http://www.churchcentral.com/nw/s/template/Article.html/id/23865
ChurchCentral.com - Louisville,KY,USA
According to the New York Times, the city has long opposed using school
buildings for worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of
church and state. ...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
by Rebecca Barnes, editor 18 Nov 2005
The worship space wars in New York City have ended with a victory for the
Bronx Household of Faith that meets at Public School 15. According to the
New York Times, the city has long opposed using school buildings for
worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of church and state.
In fact, the same judge who ruled against the church meeting at a public
school in 1996, Judge Loretta A. Preska of Federal District Court in
Manhattan, reversed her ruling this week in accordance with a 2001 decision
by the Supreme Court, which found that religious teachings on school
premises were no different from other secular lessons about "morals and
character development."
Okay then, I am a follower of the teachings of Anton LaVey who founded
the Church of Satan and wrote the Satanic Bible.
That's very nice but isn't he from California
just like Nixon and Reagan and knight?
We don't worship him
or his teachings but consider them to be valuable philosophical
insights and they definitely play a role in our character development.
So by praising this decision, are you prepared to have a group of us
Satanists hold meetings in your local public school? And don't bother
to answer, I already know your response. You will be so outraged that
Satanists are using public property paid for with your tax money and
demand it be prohibited. Your religious group will still be permitted
to use that same school that my tax money also paid for.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"When a Satanist commits a wrong, he realizes that it is natural
to make a mistake - and if he is truly sorry about what he has
done, he will learn from it and take care not to do the same
thing again. If he is not honestly sorry about what he has done,
and knows he will do the same thing over and over, he has no
business confessing and asking forgiveness in the first place.
But this is exactly what happens. People confess their sins so
that they can clear their consciences - and be free to go out and
sin again, usually the same sin."
-- Anton LaVey; "The Satanic Bible"
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Say four "go to hells" and slap six
choir members upside the head.
- Penance
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "fred" |
|
| Title: Re: Good news for churches meeting in schools |
19 Nov 2005 09:44:13 PM |
|
|
alt.education removed
John Smith wrote:
buckeye-ELo@nospam.net wrote...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
http://www.churchcentral.com/nw/s/template/Article.html/id/23865
ChurchCentral.com - Louisville,KY,USA
According to the New York Times, the city has long opposed using school
buildings for worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of
church and state. ...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
by Rebecca Barnes, editor 18 Nov 2005
The worship space wars in New York City have ended with a victory for the
Bronx Household of Faith that meets at Public School 15. According to the
New York Times, the city has long opposed using school buildings for
worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of church and state.
In fact, the same judge who ruled against the church meeting at a public
school in 1996, Judge Loretta A. Preska of Federal District Court in
Manhattan, reversed her ruling this week in accordance with a 2001 decision
by the Supreme Court, which found that religious teachings on school
premises were no different from other secular lessons about "morals and
character development."
Okay then, I am a follower of the teachings of Anton LaVey who founded
the Church of Satan and wrote the Satanic Bible. We don't worship him
or his teachings but consider them to be valuable philosophical
insights and they definitely play a role in our character development.
So by praising this decision, are you prepared to have a group of us
Satanists hold meetings in your local public school? And don't bother
to answer, I already know your response. You will be so outraged that
Satanists are using public property paid for with your tax money and
demand it be prohibited. Your religious group will still be permitted
to use that same school that my tax money also paid for.
Good point. Consider the following:
"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation
of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical."
--Thomas Jefferson: Bill for Religious Freedom, 1779. Papers 2:545
On the other hand, there should be no problem with respect to
Christians using public facilities, for example, when a given district
has 100% Christian taxpayers. Otherwise, I'm sure that compromises can
be reached in terms of exemptions, credits, etc., with respect to using
taxpayer dollars to support religious functions that utilize taxpayer
funded public resources.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"When a Satanist commits a wrong, he realizes that it is natural
to make a mistake - and if he is truly sorry about what he has
done, he will learn from it and take care not to do the same
thing again. If he is not honestly sorry about what he has done,
and knows he will do the same thing over and over, he has no
business confessing and asking forgiveness in the first place.
But this is exactly what happens. People confess their sins so
that they can clear their consciences - and be free to go out and
sin again, usually the same sin."
-- Anton LaVey; "The Satanic Bible"
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill" |
|
| Title: Re: Good news for churches meeting in schools |
20 Nov 2005 12:36:56 AM |
|
|
"fred" <clarma1@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1132436652.955314.71890@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
alt.education removed
John Smith wrote:
buckeye-ELo@nospam.net wrote...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
http://www.churchcentral.com/nw/s/template/Article.html/id/23865
ChurchCentral.com - Louisville,KY,USA
According to the New York Times, the city has long opposed using school
buildings for worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of
church and state. ...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
by Rebecca Barnes, editor 18 Nov 2005
The worship space wars in New York City have ended with a victory for
the
Bronx Household of Faith that meets at Public School 15. According to
the
New York Times, the city has long opposed using school buildings for
worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of church and
state.
In fact, the same judge who ruled against the church meeting at a
public
school in 1996, Judge Loretta A. Preska of Federal District Court in
Manhattan, reversed her ruling this week in accordance with a 2001
decision
by the Supreme Court, which found that religious teachings on school
premises were no different from other secular lessons about "morals and
character development."
Okay then, I am a follower of the teachings of Anton LaVey who founded
the Church of Satan and wrote the Satanic Bible. We don't worship him
or his teachings but consider them to be valuable philosophical
insights and they definitely play a role in our character development.
So by praising this decision, are you prepared to have a group of us
Satanists hold meetings in your local public school? And don't bother
to answer, I already know your response. You will be so outraged that
Satanists are using public property paid for with your tax money and
demand it be prohibited. Your religious group will still be permitted
to use that same school that my tax money also paid for.
Good point. Consider the following:
"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation
of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical."
--Thomas Jefferson: Bill for Religious Freedom, 1779. Papers 2:545
On the other hand, there should be no problem with respect to
Christians using public facilities, for example, when a given district
has 100% Christian taxpayers.
Where in the United states is there ANY district that has 100% of it's tax
payers believing
in the same relgion and NO agnostics or atheists???
I doubt that there is ANY such place.
Otherwise, I'm sure that compromises can
be reached in terms of exemptions, credits, etc., with respect to using
taxpayer dollars to support religious functions that utilize taxpayer
funded public resources.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"When a Satanist commits a wrong, he realizes that it is natural
to make a mistake - and if he is truly sorry about what he has
done, he will learn from it and take care not to do the same
thing again. If he is not honestly sorry about what he has done,
and knows he will do the same thing over and over, he has no
business confessing and asking forgiveness in the first place.
But this is exactly what happens. People confess their sins so
that they can clear their consciences - and be free to go out and
sin again, usually the same sin."
-- Anton LaVey; "The Satanic Bible"
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "NC" |
|
| Title: Re: Good news for churches meeting in schools |
20 Nov 2005 01:09:21 AM |
|
|
"fred" <clarma1@gmail.com> wrote:
John Smith wrote:
Okay then, I am a follower of the teachings of Anton LaVey who
founded the Church of Satan and wrote the Satanic Bible. We don't
worship him or his teachings but consider them to be valuable
philosophical insights and they definitely play a role in our
character development. So by praising this decision, are you prepared
to have a group of us Satanists hold meetings in your local public
school? And don't bother to answer, I already know your response.
You will be so outraged that Satanists are using public property paid
for with your tax money and demand it be prohibited. Your religious
group will still be permitted to use that same school that my tax
money also paid for.
Good point. Consider the following:
"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation
of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and
tyrannical." --Thomas Jefferson: Bill for Religious Freedom, 1779.
Papers 2:545
On the other hand, there should be no problem with respect to
Christians using public facilities, for example, when a given district
has 100% Christian taxpayers. Otherwise, I'm sure that compromises
can be reached in terms of exemptions, credits, etc., with respect to
using taxpayer dollars to support religious functions that utilize
taxpayer funded public resources.
The current system can be thought of as "opt in". To get tax exempt
status you register for recognition as a religious organisation. Then
you can use the money that would have gone to taxes to pay for some of
the expenses of your organisation. This only makes sense if those tax
dollars would not have ultimately aided your organisation anyway. But
more importantly is it's YOUR organisation. You get to control the funds
and the ideology...not the government. Although there is potential for
fraud, this system works quite well.
Your idea sounds like "opt out". Not only would organisations need to
register as non-Christian, but so would individual taxpayers. Is this
the kind of records we want government keeping? How would fraud be
detected? Would the government check up on them to make sure they aren't
caught doing "Christian" things? What if your spouse is Christian but
you are not? And those are just off the top of my head, there are
probably countless other problems with this scenario.
NC
.
|
|
|
| User: "fred" |
|
| Title: Re: Good news for churches meeting in schools |
20 Nov 2005 05:55:30 AM |
|
|
NC wrote:
"fred" <clarma1@gmail.com> wrote:
John Smith wrote:
Okay then, I am a follower of the teachings of Anton LaVey who
founded the Church of Satan and wrote the Satanic Bible. We don't
worship him or his teachings but consider them to be valuable
philosophical insights and they definitely play a role in our
character development. So by praising this decision, are you prepared
to have a group of us Satanists hold meetings in your local public
school? And don't bother to answer, I already know your response.
You will be so outraged that Satanists are using public property paid
for with your tax money and demand it be prohibited. Your religious
group will still be permitted to use that same school that my tax
money also paid for.
Good point. Consider the following:
"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation
of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and
tyrannical." --Thomas Jefferson: Bill for Religious Freedom, 1779.
Papers 2:545
On the other hand, there should be no problem with respect to
Christians using public facilities, for example, when a given district
has 100% Christian taxpayers. Otherwise, I'm sure that compromises
can be reached in terms of exemptions, credits, etc., with respect to
using taxpayer dollars to support religious functions that utilize
taxpayer funded public resources.
The current system can be thought of as "opt in". To get tax exempt
status you register for recognition as a religious organisation. Then
you can use the money that would have gone to taxes to pay for some of
the expenses of your organisation. This only makes sense if those tax
dollars would not have ultimately aided your organisation anyway. But
more importantly is it's YOUR organisation. You get to control the funds
and the ideology...not the government. Although there is potential for
fraud, this system works quite well.
Your idea sounds like "opt out". Not only would organisations need to
register as non-Christian, but so would individual taxpayers. Is this
the kind of records we want government keeping? How would fraud be
detected? Would the government check up on them to make sure they aren't
caught doing "Christian" things? What if your spouse is Christian but
you are not? And those are just off the top of my head, there are
probably countless other problems with this scenario.
I think that you are deliberately trying to make the challenge more
complicated than it needs to be. After all, an optional religious tax
for a specified program could possibly be approached with a mechanism
as simple as checking the box on a tax return to contribute $3 to
campaign funds, for example.
NC
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Good news for churches meeting in schools |
20 Nov 2005 04:06:54 PM |
|
|
:|
:|On the other hand, there should be no problem with respect to
:|Christians using public facilities, for example, when a given district
:|has 100% Christian taxpayers.
Christian is not one group, one religion, one denomination, one sect one
religious society.
Since you seem to be so historically challenged I can understand you not
realizing that "Christians" have been persecuting "christians" for a very
long time.
The various sects, religious societies, denominations, branches of
"Christian" rarely agree on much of anything.
Just wanted to set the record straight troll, carry on with your Jefferson
mantras and theocratic propaganda
*****************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Jensen" |
|
| Title: Re: Good news for churches meeting in schools |
20 Nov 2005 01:55:30 AM |
|
|
On 19 Nov 2005 13:44:13 -0800, in alt.atheism
"fred" <clarma1@gmail.com> wrote in
<1132436652.955314.71890@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
alt.education removed
John Smith wrote:
buckeye-ELo@nospam.net wrote...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
http://www.churchcentral.com/nw/s/template/Article.html/id/23865
ChurchCentral.com - Louisville,KY,USA
According to the New York Times, the city has long opposed using school
buildings for worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of
church and state. ...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
by Rebecca Barnes, editor 18 Nov 2005
The worship space wars in New York City have ended with a victory for the
Bronx Household of Faith that meets at Public School 15. According to the
New York Times, the city has long opposed using school buildings for
worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of church and state.
In fact, the same judge who ruled against the church meeting at a public
school in 1996, Judge Loretta A. Preska of Federal District Court in
Manhattan, reversed her ruling this week in accordance with a 2001 decision
by the Supreme Court, which found that religious teachings on school
premises were no different from other secular lessons about "morals and
character development."
Okay then, I am a follower of the teachings of Anton LaVey who founded
the Church of Satan and wrote the Satanic Bible. We don't worship him
or his teachings but consider them to be valuable philosophical
insights and they definitely play a role in our character development.
So by praising this decision, are you prepared to have a group of us
Satanists hold meetings in your local public school? And don't bother
to answer, I already know your response. You will be so outraged that
Satanists are using public property paid for with your tax money and
demand it be prohibited. Your religious group will still be permitted
to use that same school that my tax money also paid for.
Good point. Consider the following:
"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation
of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical."
--Thomas Jefferson: Bill for Religious Freedom, 1779. Papers 2:545
On the other hand, there should be no problem with respect to
Christians using public facilities, for example, when a given district
has 100% Christian taxpayers. Otherwise, I'm sure that compromises can
be reached in terms of exemptions, credits, etc., with respect to using
taxpayer dollars to support religious functions that utilize taxpayer
funded public resources.
I'm sure the Baptists will be thrilled to fund the Catholics.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Good news for churches meeting in schools |
19 Nov 2005 11:56:20 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 04:09:35 -0600, wrote:
Good news for churches meeting in schools
http://www.churchcentral.com/nw/s/template/Article.html/id/23865
ChurchCentral.com - Louisville,KY,USA
According to the New York Times, the city has long opposed using school
buildings for worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of
church and state. ...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
by Rebecca Barnes, editor 18 Nov 2005
The worship space wars in New York City have ended with a victory for the
Bronx Household of Faith that meets at Public School 15. According to the
New York Times, the city has long opposed using school buildings for
worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of church and state.
In fact, the same judge who ruled against the church meeting at a public
school in 1996, Judge Loretta A. Preska of Federal District Court in
Manhattan, reversed her ruling this week in accordance with a 2001 decision
by the Supreme Court, which found that religious teachings on school
premises were no different from other secular lessons about "morals and
character development."
The city attorney plans to appeal this ruling. But to the rest of the
country, Middle American, anyway, and to evangelical Christians in
particular, many of whom meet for church every week at public schools or
movie theaters, the 10 year battle for a small church in the Bronx appears
ludicrous.
Jordan Lorence, the congregation’s attorney, and senior counsel for The
Alliance Defense Fund, told WorldNetDaily, ""It's a simple, common sense
principle that took over a decade and multiple court rulings for the New
York City school board to understand," he said.
"Almost everyone in America but the public school system of New York City
understands that the government doesn't endorse everything it allows,"
Lorence also said.
The implications of the big victory for the small church may ripple across
to the West Coast where Rev. Ken Hutcherson has been battling for ground in
a public school where Antioch Bible Church now meets. Most recently he has
been targeted by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network. Members
of that group testified before the school board last month that having the
church in the building of Lake Washington High School interfered with the
school mission, according to GayWired.com.
But even in Middle America, the debate pitting church and state in the
public schools, has reverberated. One irate parent in Thedford, Neb., wants
a school superintendent there sacked because a church group is encouraging
students to join their congregation. According to The North Platte
Telegraph, an abstinence and drug-free program got way out of control for
young cornhuskers when they were given a free "Book of Hope" at school and
encouraged to come to church.
Forget about the peer pressure to drink, do drugs, smoke or have sex, the
peer pressure to worship God was way out of control.
Perhaps high school students should be encouraged to avoid all of
those until they are a little older (as in having graduating or
flunked out of high school) before they try to handle activities
such as those.
Gray Shockley
--------------------
When all you've got is a hammer,
everything else looks like a nail.
The board won’t fire
the superintendent, seems he was on his way out anyway, with retirement
plans at the end of the year.
*****************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "fred" |
|
| Title: Re: Good news for churches meeting in schools |
19 Nov 2005 09:50:21 PM |
|
|
alt.education removed
buckeye-ELo@nospam.net wrote:
Good news for churches meeting in schools
http://www.churchcentral.com/nw/s/template/Article.html/id/23865
ChurchCentral.com - Louisville,KY,USA
According to the New York Times, the city has long opposed using school
buildings for worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of
church and state. ...
Good news for churches meeting in schools
by Rebecca Barnes, editor 18 Nov 2005
The worship space wars in New York City have ended with a victory for the
Bronx Household of Faith that meets at Public School 15. According to the
New York Times, the city has long opposed using school buildings for
worship, viewing it as a violation of the separation of church and state.
In fact, the same judge who ruled against the church meeting at a public
school in 1996, Judge Loretta A. Preska of Federal District Court in
Manhattan, reversed her ruling this week in accordance with a 2001 decision
by the Supreme Court, which found that religious teachings on school
premises were no different from other secular lessons about "morals and
character development."
The city attorney plans to appeal this ruling. But to the rest of the
country, Middle American, anyway, and to evangelical Christians in
particular, many of whom meet for church every week at public schools or
movie theaters, the 10 year battle for a small church in the Bronx appears
ludicrous.
The issue is ludicrous. After all, consider that Thomas Jefferson, Mr.
"wall of separation" himself, not only regularly attended worship
service held in the hall of the House of Representatives at the
Nation's Capitol, but he also authorized the US Marine Band to provide
music for worship services held in other government buildings as well.
Jordan Lorence, the congregation's attorney, and senior counsel for The
Alliance Defense Fund, told WorldNetDaily, ""It's a simple, common sense
principle that took over a decade and multiple court rulings for the New
York City school board to understand," he said.
"Almost everyone in America but the public school system of New York City
<snipped for brevity>
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Good news for churches meeting in schools |
20 Nov 2005 04:06:40 PM |
|
|
"fred" <clarma1@gmail.com> wrote:
:|The issue is ludicrous. After all, consider that Thomas Jefferson, Mr.
:|"wall of separation" himself, not only regularly attended worship
:|service held in the hall of the House of Representatives at the
:|Nation's Capitol, but he also authorized the US Marine Band to provide
:|music for worship services held in other government buildings as well.
Your unsubstantiated claim is noted.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ordinary or extraordinary claims require ordinary or extraordinary proof.
If you're going to claim something and especially something outlandish
you're going to need some pretty extraordinary and/or irrefutable proof to
back up such a claim. "Where's the beef?" Where's the ordinary or
extraordinary proof for their ordinary or extraordinary claims? If one is
not responding with ordinary or extraordinary, *factual* proof, then the
claim is not worth considering
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[ as Homer@nospam said]
Why is asking for "proof" considered truculence? Do you consider it
truculence for a judge to ask for evidence in a trial. Would you rather
that
people just testified that they believed in the guilt of the suspect?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[as Gray Shockley said:]
Your "opinion" is not an adequate citation.
You forgot your citations.
Or, are your opinions more valid than facts?
You do realize, do you not?, that opinion without substantiation is just
propaganda for those without critical thinking abilities and originate with
those who are attempting to manipulate rather than those who are attempting
to clarify.
*****************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|