| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
| Date: |
25 Dec 2005 11:02:47 AM |
| Object: |
GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and
counting
Unemployment below 5%.
Actually, you're full of *****.
Unemployment is at 5% as of 11/2005. Care to compare that number to
the what it was when Clinton was president?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2160 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
.
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
27 Dec 2005 07:36:57 PM |
|
|
LC wrote:
"Mimi Cohen" <mimiNOSPAMgal@cox.net> wrote in message
news:%xisf.1235$ZA5.920@fed1read05...
LC wrote:
"Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com> wrote in message
news:4Wesf.653103$x96.432920@attbi_s72...
"LC" <LCisnot@this.com> wrote in message
news:dorrfc0tum@enews4.newsguy.com...
Anti-Kerry, but pro-stupidity troll "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote in message news:Yqasf.659786$_o.376568@attbi_s71...
<jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1135680680.298065.206030@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135620400.419019.261520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis" <a
ntikerry@go.com> wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget
You mean he didn't _merely_ balance the budget. He in fact
pulled a surplus: $69 billion
NOPE.
Another rightard that doesn't understand the concept of 'truth'.
I understand that you;re a lying FUCKTARD.
I understand you're unable to refute that Clinton left a surplus.
Iow, just another lying 'tard.
<plonk>
Run, Morty, run!
Moron Davis is a lying, moronic coward,
Yup.
just like "osprey"
Well, at least "Morty" runs off in shame when caught lying, unlike Heishman,
who just lies about his lies.<g>
True :)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
27 Dec 2005 03:40:02 PM |
|
|
Morton Davis wrote:
"LC" <LCisnot@this.com> wrote in message
news:dorrfc0tum@enews4.newsguy.com...
Anti-Kerry, but pro-stupidity troll "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote
in message news:Yqasf.659786$_o.376568@attbi_s71...
<jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1135680680.298065.206030@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135620400.419019.261520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis" <a
ntikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget
You mean he didn't _merely_ balance the budget. He in fact
pulled a surplus: $69 billion
NOPE.
Another rightard that doesn't understand the concept of 'truth'.
I understand that you;re a lying FUCKTARD.
<plonk>
We all understand that you're a lying *COWARD* who kill files everyone
you can't refute which is damned near anyone with more than a 60 IQ. It
must suck to be you; a lying, moronic coward. You and known and "proven"
lying coward bobby heishman posting as "osprey" are 2 peas in a pod
are you his sock puppet?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
27 Dec 2005 08:51:14 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135620400.419019.261520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis" <a ntikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget
You mean he didn't _merely_ balance the budget. He in fact
pulled a surplus: $69 billion in FY 1998, $124 billion in
FY 1999 and $237 billion in FY 2000.
There you go again; using facts. Don't you know how much RRRwingnuts
like Moron Davis hate facts? Facts *NEVER* back up the loony claims
RRRwingnuts advocate, ergo they hate facts.
it was predicated on maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
No, paying off the DEBT by 2010 was predicated on
maintaining the status quo:
http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/new/html/Fri_Dec_29_151111_2000.htmlˇ
I predict that Moron Davis will use the cookie cutter response used by
all RRRwingnuts "that's a liberal biased source"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
26 Dec 2005 01:55:58 PM |
|
|
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135620400.419019.261520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as long
as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem with
the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton supposedly left
us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever the number was), a
number based on unrealistic projections. Still, the current
administration has been spending way too much money, in my opinion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
26 Dec 2005 02:21:11 PM |
|
|
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as long
as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem with
the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton supposedly left
us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever the number was), a
number based on unrealistic projections.
Did those "unrealistic projections" come from Bush, by any chance? I
seem to recall a number of outrageous claims from him when he was
trying to justify massive tax cuts for the wealthy.
Still, the current
administration has been spending way too much money, in my opinion.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
26 Dec 2005 05:40:04 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as long
as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem with
the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton supposedly left
us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever the number was), a
number based on unrealistic projections.
Did those "unrealistic projections" come from Bush, by any chance? I
seem to recall a number of outrageous claims from him when he was
trying to justify massive tax cuts for the wealthy.
Mr. Bush and Mr. Gore both used the projected "surplus" in their
campaigns. Mr. Gore held that with "record surpluses, we now have a
historical opportunity to pay off the publicly held national debt."
Mr. Bradley (the other Democrat in the 2000 campaign thought to have a
chance to make it to the finish line) "made the spending of the
record-breaking budget surplus on a variety of social welfare programs
to help the poor and the middle-class one of his central issues." Mr.
Bush pledged a "huge tax cut intended to return a large part of the
projected budget surplus back to the taxpayers."
The projections were provided by the Congressional Budget Office.
Still, the current
administration has been spending way too much money, in my opinion.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
26 Dec 2005 11:03:53 PM |
|
|
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as long
as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem with
the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton supposedly left
us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever the number was), a
number based on unrealistic projections.
Did those "unrealistic projections" come from Bush, by any chance? I
seem to recall a number of outrageous claims from him when he was
trying to justify massive tax cuts for the wealthy.
Mr. Bush and Mr. Gore both used the projected "surplus" in their
campaigns. Mr. Gore held that with "record surpluses, we now have a
historical opportunity to pay off the publicly held national debt."
Mr. Bradley (the other Democrat in the 2000 campaign thought to have a
chance to make it to the finish line) "made the spending of the
record-breaking budget surplus on a variety of social welfare programs
to help the poor and the middle-class one of his central issues." Mr.
Bush pledged a "huge tax cut intended to return a large part of the
projected budget surplus back to the taxpayers."
The projections were provided by the Congressional Budget Office.
Nah. Bush took the projections and made wild assumptions about how
well the economy would do.
As we now know, Bush was full of *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
27 Dec 2005 08:47:27 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as long
as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem with
the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton supposedly left
us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever the number was), a
number based on unrealistic projections.
Did those "unrealistic projections" come from Bush, by any chance? I
seem to recall a number of outrageous claims from him when he was
trying to justify massive tax cuts for the wealthy.
Mr. Bush and Mr. Gore both used the projected "surplus" in their
campaigns. Mr. Gore held that with "record surpluses, we now have a
historical opportunity to pay off the publicly held national debt."
Mr. Bradley (the other Democrat in the 2000 campaign thought to have a
chance to make it to the finish line) "made the spending of the
record-breaking budget surplus on a variety of social welfare programs
to help the poor and the middle-class one of his central issues." Mr.
Bush pledged a "huge tax cut intended to return a large part of the
projected budget surplus back to the taxpayers."
The projections were provided by the Congressional Budget Office.
Nah. Bush took the projections and made wild assumptions about how
well the economy would do.
As we now know, Bush was full of *****.
Was and *IS*
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
27 Dec 2005 11:56:28 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as long
as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem with
the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton supposedly left
us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever the number was), a
number based on unrealistic projections.
Did those "unrealistic projections" come from Bush, by any chance? I
seem to recall a number of outrageous claims from him when he was
trying to justify massive tax cuts for the wealthy.
Mr. Bush and Mr. Gore both used the projected "surplus" in their
campaigns. Mr. Gore held that with "record surpluses, we now have a
historical opportunity to pay off the publicly held national debt."
Mr. Bradley (the other Democrat in the 2000 campaign thought to have a
chance to make it to the finish line) "made the spending of the
record-breaking budget surplus on a variety of social welfare programs
to help the poor and the middle-class one of his central issues." Mr.
Bush pledged a "huge tax cut intended to return a large part of the
projected budget surplus back to the taxpayers."
The projections were provided by the Congressional Budget Office.
Nah. Bush took the projections and made wild assumptions about how
well the economy would do.
In July, 2000, the "CBO projected that the surpluses would grow every
year for a cumulative $2.2 trillion over the next ten years. Including
the Social Security surpluses, combined federal budget surpluses over
the next ten years would total $4.6 trillion." Starting with the
budget for FY 2001, fiscal restraint basically went out the window.
Every candidate relied on this projection, even non-candidate Mr.
Clinton, who presented a budget "plan to completely eliminate the
national debt by 2013".
That Mr. Bush spent (and spends) too much is not in debate, as far as
I'm concerned. Another poster, Mr. Davis, is fairly sure that the
money is well spent. I am not certain of that at all, but I do hope he
is correct.
As we now know, Bush was full of *****.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morton Davis" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
27 Dec 2005 12:28:23 PM |
|
|
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135706188.583375.58520@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis"
<antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget
and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on
maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as
long
as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem
with
the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton supposedly
left
us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever the number was),
a
number based on unrealistic projections.
Did those "unrealistic projections" come from Bush, by any chance? I
seem to recall a number of outrageous claims from him when he was
trying to justify massive tax cuts for the wealthy.
Mr. Bush and Mr. Gore both used the projected "surplus" in their
campaigns. Mr. Gore held that with "record surpluses, we now have a
historical opportunity to pay off the publicly held national debt."
Mr. Bradley (the other Democrat in the 2000 campaign thought to have a
chance to make it to the finish line) "made the spending of the
record-breaking budget surplus on a variety of social welfare programs
to help the poor and the middle-class one of his central issues." Mr.
Bush pledged a "huge tax cut intended to return a large part of the
projected budget surplus back to the taxpayers."
The projections were provided by the Congressional Budget Office.
Nah. Bush took the projections and made wild assumptions about how
well the economy would do.
In July, 2000, the "CBO projected that the surpluses would grow every
year for a cumulative $2.2 trillion over the next ten years.
The return on Clinton not doing ANYTHING about Bin Laden was 9-11. Even if
9-11 had not happened, the .com bust and the hundreds of millions of dolars
of other stock scandles that were perpetrated during the Clinton
administration would have destroyed the so-called "balanded budget". Since
the DEFICIT grew under Clinton - there was no surplus. It was creative, but
not very, bookeeping i.e. a LIE.
Including
the Social Security surpluses, combined federal budget surpluses over
the next ten years would total $4.6 trillion." Starting with the
budget for FY 2001, fiscal restraint basically went out the window.
Every candidate relied on this projection, even non-candidate Mr.
Clinton, who presented a budget "plan to completely eliminate the
national debt by 2013".
His concept depended on the incredibly fragile economy he left us with
staying full of hot air AND nothing bad happening between then and 2013.
9-11, the .com bust, Katrina and Rita would have fucked that up without
Iraq.
That Mr. Bush spent (and spends) too much is not in debate, as far as
I'm concerned. Another poster, Mr. Davis, is fairly sure that the
money is well spent. I am not certain of that at all, but I do hope he
is correct.
The policies of the Clinton administration aided and abetted the theft of
billions of dollars from investors, set up for a rise in unemployment and
basically bled tens of thousands of jobs into outsourcing overseas. Under
Bush, despite the whining of the angry left, the economy is booming,
unemployment is below Clinton's best numbers and government tax revenues are
up. We have also stood up to the Taliban, Saddam and al Quaeda and served
notice that it is no longer safe to murder Americans as a political
statement.
Basically, the Democrats have absolutely NOTHING. As bad as they say
President Bush's polls are - theirs are worse.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
27 Dec 2005 01:06:06 PM |
|
|
Morton Davis <antikerry@go.com> wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135706188.583375.58520@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis"
<antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget
and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on
maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as
long
as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem
with
the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton supposedly
left
us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever the number was),
a
number based on unrealistic projections.
Did those "unrealistic projections" come from Bush, by any chance? I
seem to recall a number of outrageous claims from him when he was
trying to justify massive tax cuts for the wealthy.
Mr. Bush and Mr. Gore both used the projected "surplus" in their
campaigns. Mr. Gore held that with "record surpluses, we now have a
historical opportunity to pay off the publicly held national debt."
Mr. Bradley (the other Democrat in the 2000 campaign thought to have a
chance to make it to the finish line) "made the spending of the
record-breaking budget surplus on a variety of social welfare programs
to help the poor and the middle-class one of his central issues." Mr.
Bush pledged a "huge tax cut intended to return a large part of the
projected budget surplus back to the taxpayers."
The projections were provided by the Congressional Budget Office.
Nah. Bush took the projections and made wild assumptions about how
well the economy would do.
In July, 2000, the "CBO projected that the surpluses would grow every
year for a cumulative $2.2 trillion over the next ten years.
The return on Clinton not doing ANYTHING about Bin Laden was 9-11.
Attacking, capturing, or killing foreign nationals who have not
commited any crime is illegal under US and international law.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
27 Dec 2005 03:43:58 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Morton Davis <antikerry@go.com> wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135706188.583375.58520@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis"
<antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget
and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on
maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as
long
as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem
with
the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton supposedly
left
us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever the number was),
a
number based on unrealistic projections.
Did those "unrealistic projections" come from Bush, by any chance? I
seem to recall a number of outrageous claims from him when he was
trying to justify massive tax cuts for the wealthy.
Mr. Bush and Mr. Gore both used the projected "surplus" in their
campaigns. Mr. Gore held that with "record surpluses, we now have a
historical opportunity to pay off the publicly held national debt."
Mr. Bradley (the other Democrat in the 2000 campaign thought to have a
chance to make it to the finish line) "made the spending of the
record-breaking budget surplus on a variety of social welfare programs
to help the poor and the middle-class one of his central issues." Mr.
Bush pledged a "huge tax cut intended to return a large part of the
projected budget surplus back to the taxpayers."
The projections were provided by the Congressional Budget Office.
Nah. Bush took the projections and made wild assumptions about how
well the economy would do.
In July, 2000, the "CBO projected that the surpluses would grow every
year for a cumulative $2.2 trillion over the next ten years.
The return on Clinton not doing ANYTHING about Bin Laden was 9-11.
Attacking, capturing, or killing foreign nationals who have not
commited any crime is illegal under US and international law.
Ray, you know that RRRwingnuts like Moron Davis and his pResident don't
give a ***** about laws, they only care about themselves and their agenda.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Morton Davis" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
26 Dec 2005 05:51:52 PM |
|
|
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135640404.002024.138050@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis"
<antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on
maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as long
as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem with
the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton supposedly left
us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever the number was), a
number based on unrealistic projections.
Did those "unrealistic projections" come from Bush, by any chance? I
seem to recall a number of outrageous claims from him when he was
trying to justify massive tax cuts for the wealthy.
Mr. Bush and Mr. Gore both used the projected "surplus" in their
campaigns. Mr. Gore held that with "record surpluses, we now have a
historical opportunity to pay off the publicly held national debt."
Mr. Bradley (the other Democrat in the 2000 campaign thought to have a
chance to make it to the finish line) "made the spending of the
record-breaking budget surplus on a variety of social welfare programs
to help the poor and the middle-class one of his central issues." Mr.
Bush pledged a "huge tax cut intended to return a large part of the
projected budget surplus back to the taxpayers."
The projections were provided by the Congressional Budget Office.
However, the "masasive tax cuts for the wealthy" are another LIEberal
construct. Everyone who pays federal income tax got a tax cut. The dipshits
of the angry left believe the fact that x% of $million is greater than x% of
$20K is a grave social injustice.
The projected surplus never really existed as it was based upon future
events. In fact, many of the cuts in social programs the left tried to blame
Bush for were mandated by the Clinton "balanced budget".
.
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
26 Dec 2005 06:21:14 PM |
|
|
"Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com> wrote in
news:sm%rf.436320$084.233343@attbi_s22:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135640404.002024.138050@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Ray Fischer wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote:
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis"
<antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget
and public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on
maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as
long as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a
problem with the concept that some folks have about how Mr.
Clinton supposedly left us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or
whatever the number was), a number based on unrealistic
projections.
Did those "unrealistic projections" come from Bush, by any chance?
I seem to recall a number of outrageous claims from him when he was
trying to justify massive tax cuts for the wealthy.
Mr. Bush and Mr. Gore both used the projected "surplus" in their
campaigns. Mr. Gore held that with "record surpluses, we now have a
historical opportunity to pay off the publicly held national debt."
Mr. Bradley (the other Democrat in the 2000 campaign thought to have
a chance to make it to the finish line) "made the spending of the
record-breaking budget surplus on a variety of social welfare
programs to help the poor and the middle-class one of his central
issues." Mr. Bush pledged a "huge tax cut intended to return a large
part of the projected budget surplus back to the taxpayers."
The projections were provided by the Congressional Budget Office.
However, the "masasive tax cuts for the wealthy" are another LIEberal
construct. Everyone who pays federal income tax got a tax cut. The
dipshits of the angry left believe the fact that x% of $million is
greater than x% of $20K is a grave social injustice.
The projected surplus never really existed as it was based upon future
events. In fact, many of the cuts in social programs the left tried to
blame Bush for were mandated by the Clinton "balanced budget".
Looks like the ng moniker "Moron Davis" fits you pretty well.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
27 Dec 2005 05:21:09 AM |
|
|
Morton Davis wrote:
[...]
H owever, the "masasive tax cuts for the wealthy" are another LIEberal
construct. Everyone who pays federal income tax got a tax cut.
Here was the promise:
"The Bush tax cuts benefit all Americans but reserve the
greatest percentage for the lowest income families"
--GWB 1999.
Clearly this isn't true. It is two lies really. 50 million
households got no benefit at all from the 2003 tax cuts.
For one thing 90% of people with incomes under $100,000
pay more in payroll taxes than income taxes.
The dipshits of the angry left
Amusingly ironic!
believe the fact that x% of $million is greater than x% of
$20K is a grave social injustice.
As a matter of fact the richest %1 of Americans-- with
incomes over $337,000-- got and will get a %15 cut in
taxes, 2003-2010 whereas the other 99% get a 7%.
Bush said of Gore, in the second debate: "He [Gore] says
he is going to give you tax cuts; 50 million of you
won't receive it. He wants to make sure the right people
get tax relief. That's not a role of a president to decide
right and wrong."
Ironic, huh?
The projected surplus never really existed as it was based upon future
events.
Sorry pal. There were surpluses in 1998, 99, and 2000,
each one larger than the year before. Even the Bush
administration disagrees with you. Director of OMB,
Mitch Daniels said in 2001, "The president does believe
that cutting taxes is the best way to spur growth and
therefore to have a return to bigger surpluses."
i
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Morton Davis" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
26 Dec 2005 02:34:49 PM |
|
|
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135626958.622997.323510@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135620400.419019.261520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on
maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as long
as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem with
the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton supposedly left
us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever the number was), a
number based on unrealistic projections. Still, the current
administration has been spending way too much money, in my opinion.
They ALL spend way too much money. The trick is in the return on that money.
Time will tell the tale, I believe that tale will be that the expenditures
of this administration were worth it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
26 Dec 2005 03:23:38 PM |
|
|
"Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com> wrote in
news:JtYrf.677948$xm3.473691@attbi_s21:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135626958.622997.323510@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135620400.419019.261520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis"
<antikerry@go.com> wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget
and public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on
maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as
long as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem
with the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton
supposedly left us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever
the number was), a number based on unrealistic projections. Still,
the current administration has been spending way too much money, in
my opinion.
They ALL spend way too much money. The trick is in the return on that
money. Time will tell the tale, I believe that tale will be that the
expenditures of this administration were worth it.
Of course you do, Moron Davis. That's because you are a typical
bootlicking Bush lapdog and goose-stepping neocon wingnut. Your
"glorious leader" can do no wrong in your pitiful opinion.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
26 Dec 2005 03:21:37 PM |
|
|
Morton Davis <antikerry@go.com> wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
"Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on
maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as long
as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem with
the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton supposedly left
us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever the number was), a
number based on unrealistic projections. Still, the current
administration has been spending way too much money, in my opinion.
They ALL spend way too much money. The trick is in the return on that money.
Time will tell the tale, I believe that tale will be that the expenditures
of this administration were worth it.
Sure, the $500,000,000,000 the US will spend in Iraq to create another
religious theocracy will have been well worth the expense. And it's
not as if spending money on health care for poor Americans and on
education for students was really all that worthwhile.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: GOP Moron of the Day: Morton Davis |
26 Dec 2005 05:42:18 PM |
|
|
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135626958.622997.323510@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Morton Davis wrote:
<r_c_brown@hushmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135620400.419019.261520@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:54:51 GMT, "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com>
wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Clinton ballanced budget - non-existant.
Bzzz. Leave it up to a NeoCon to make ***** up.
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2005/12/rev_spen_exss3.html
Perhaps Mr. Davis was conflating the concepts of annual budget and
public debt.
NOPE. Clinton did not balance the budget it was predicated on
maintaining
the staus quo well into the future.
I agree that an annual 'balanced' budget is fairly meaningless as long
as the public debt continues to increase. I also have a problem with
the concept that some folks have about how Mr. Clinton supposedly left
us with a five trillion dollar surplus (or whatever the number was), a
number based on unrealistic projections. Still, the current
administration has been spending way too much money, in my opinion.
They ALL spend way too much money.
Agreed.
The trick is in the return on that money.
Time will tell the tale, I believe that tale will be that the expenditures
of this administration were worth it.
I hope that you are correct.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
