"> > Ah yes the man that knows all and sees all. Your previous comments were

based on your cynical views and nothing else.

My point of view only. Accept or reject at your leisure.

Uh oh an admission of truth.

It's also been put about widely that the subsequent string of

incredibly

suspicious deaths amongst the Saudi ruling class was a housecleaning

of

the 9-11 conspirators and at least one of those who "fell down a lift
shaft and landed on six bullets" was one of the 9-13 departures.

Google

for Prince Ahmed bin Salman bin Abdul Aziz.

It was widely PUT ABOUT that the Mafia, the CIA, Castro, and the KGB

and

other sundry groups assinated Kennedy. Read the "The Kingfish" you will

be

convinced the Mafia did it.
IT WAS LEE HARVEY OSWALD. The WARREN COMMISSION SAID SO. I can string
together any sequence of events and make them look sinister. Put that

about.

So there have never been ANY conspiracies? Caesar, Mary QoS, Lincoln?
How about all the Wall Street conspiracies to defraud investors?
Means, motive and opportunity, those are what you look at
and if those 3 align, and make sense, then you look for hard evidence.

.

Let me see because there have been

conspiracys then it follows that the 9-11 Commission report must be a
conspiracy; and, of course, because you believe it to be so.
The Mafia had means, motive and opportunity to kill Pres. Kennedy. Waste
your time looking.

It is at the very least plausible that a bunch of people involved with

9-11 were waved out of the USA on 9-13 because of the Bush/Saudi
political relationship, on the understanding that they would be
assassinated later if they were bad for business.

Plausible? How weak. Put about and plausible - what damning evidence.
Bring some solid evidence and let's have a hanging. After all I am a
conservative, I like hangings.

See above for the means, motive and opportunity model.
I can see you have never been involved in any form of investigation.

Really? The perfect model - solve every crime- balderdash. Everyone that
fits your perfect model is guilty. Rot.

You're really not reading what I am writing. Means, motive
and opportunity underpin the formulation of a theory.

Yes I am. I am not buying it.

After

that, you need to find the hard evidence to support that theory
and make a case. That's the way it works. No witch hunt, merely
an empirical method of investigation. In the absense of any supporting
evidence, you move onto the next theory and try to support that.
Doesn't mean that evidence collection doesn't happen in parallel
to theory formulation though.

After you look at every body in your theory you will be an old man.

Did you look into your conspiracy crystal ball to determine that? The
perfect model that led you to make that conclusion about me - keep

trucking

your model has put you in the top of the wrong tree already.

Why on earth would you assume I used my model to assess you?
I have no clue who you are or what you do.

You concluded that I had never conducted an investigation. Have you ever
been in court?

...

hcannon wrote:

Prejudice against what or whom? Get the money out of politics
and regain control of the pols. ZERO TOLERANCE for corruption
in government.

Different subject. You will never get the money out of politics. So

leave

fantasy Island and join the real world. Bad judgment is often mistaken

for

corruption in politics. I see you have never been on the inside.

Stop trolling. You WILL get the covert money out of politics
if you make the politicians accountable and have a zero tolerance policy
for corruption that kicks off with a minimum 10 year sentence.

Bah, I do not intend to hold my breath.

So what makes you think that a Bi - Partisan Committee that put together

the

9-11 report lied.
Did you read page 329?

On the Saudis leaving? Yes. Don't think I can believe any of it
any more since it's all so self-serving. Self-serving means that both
the Clinton and Bush administrations and DEM and GOP have screwed up
down the years, and both sides have too much to hide from the American
people.

Hide what - that they cannot predict the future? I suggest you read " Blind
Spot - The Secret History of American Counter Terrorism" by Timothy Naftali.
It is a non partisan book.

My copy of the 9/11 commission report has special pride of place

next to Veil - Bob Woodward's pompous CIA secret wars which I have
cunningly placed next to Betrayal - the Aldrich Ames Story :)

Ah, I see, cynical..

Little Perfect World." by Stoned Screen.
Good thing you were not around when Kennedy got assassinated you really
would have freaked.

The CIA and Feds became fat and happy after the cold war
was over and started believing all the Hollywood movies about how
omniscient and all-powerful they are.

Did you read all the stories on what Sibel Edmonds(the FBI translator)
had to say and what her story was? Her little article on the 9/11
commission and her testimony to them is here:
http://antiwar.com/edmonds/?articleid=3151

Yea she sounds like a crank nut case. Govt abounds with people like that.
They like to blow their own horn. I used to have to chase to them and their
so called facts down. Note she started working after 9-11.

but the world in "Sixty Seconds" never impressed me much. I remember when Mo
Better Safer breathlessly told us the Abrahams Tank would not work and
neither would the Bradley.

blowing civilians to tell you why.
Guess what - they been working fine ever since. Love that big tank with FU
on the barrel.

Read Scheuers Imperial Hubris too??

That might be worth a try. But, if it turns out just another to be just
another anti Bush author grinding an axe it is a waste of time. I did not
bother to read the anti - Clinton authors either; and I did not like him.
You might want to see what Bernard Goldberg has to say.