Gov Saw Flood Risk but not Levee Failure



 Religions > Atheism > Gov Saw Flood Risk but not Levee Failure

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Fred Stone"
Date: 02 Sep 2005 08:24:00 AM
Object: Gov Saw Flood Risk but not Levee Failure
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/02/national/nationalspecial/02response.ht
ml
WASHINGTON, Sept. 1 - When Michael D. Brown, director of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency, returned in January from a tour of the
tsunami devastation in Asia, he urgently gathered his aides to prepare
for a similar catastrophe at home.
Skip to next paragraph
Enlarge This Image
M. Scott Mahaskey/Army Times, via Associated Press
With refugees at the Superdome desperate to be leave New Orleans, Maj.
Ed Bush of the Louisiana National Guard pleaded Thursday for calm.
"New Orleans was the No. 1 disaster we were talking about," recalled
Eric L. Tolbert, then a top FEMA official. "We were obsessed with New
Orleans because of the risk."
Disaster officials, who had drawn up dozens of plans and conducted
preparedness drills for years, had long known that the low-lying city
was especially vulnerable. But despite all the warnings, Hurricane
Katrina overwhelmed the very government agencies that had rehearsed for
such a calamity. On Thursday, as the flooded city descended into near-
anarchy, frantic local officials blasted the federal and state emergency
response as woefully sluggish and confused.
"We're in our fifth day and adequate help to quell the situation has not
arrived yet," said Edwin P. Compass III, the New Orleans police
superintendent.
The response will be dissected for years. But on Thursday, disaster
experts and frustrated officials said a crucial shortcoming may have
been the failure to predict that the levees keeping Lake Pontchartrain
out of the city would be breached, not just overflow.
They also said that evacuation measures were inadequate, leaving far too
many city residents behind to suffer severe hardships and, in some
cases, join marauding gangs.
Large numbers of National Guard troops should have been deployed on
flooded streets early in the disaster to keep order, the critics said.
And some questioned whether the federal government's intense focus on
terrorism had distracted from planning practical steps to cope with a
major natural disaster.
Disaster experts acknowledged that the impact of Hurricane Katrina posed
unprecedented difficulties. "There are amazing challenges and
obstacles," said Joe Becker, the top disaster response official at the
American Red Cross.
Under the circumstances, Mr. Becker said, the government response "has
been nothing short of heroic."
But he added that the first, life-saving phase of hurricane response,
which usually lasts a matter of hours, in this case was stretching over
days.
While some in New Orleans fault FEMA - Terry Ebbert, homeland security
director for New Orleans, called it a "hamstrung" bureaucracy - others
say any blame should be more widely spread. Local, state and federal
officials, for example, have cooperated on disaster planning. In 2000,
they studied the impact of a fictional "Hurricane Zebra"; last year they
drilled with "Hurricane Pam."
Neither exercise expected the levees to fail. In an interview Thursday
on "Good Morning America," President Bush said, "I don't think anyone
anticipated the breach of the levees." He added, "Now we're having to
deal with it, and will."
Some lapses may have occurred because of budget cuts. For example, Mr.
Tolbert, the former FEMA official, said that "funding dried up" for
follow-up to the 2004 Hurricane Pam exercise, cutting off work on plans
to shelter thousands of survivors.
Brian Wolshon, an engineering professor at Louisiana State University
who served as a consultant on the state's evacuation plan, said little
attention was paid to moving out New Orleans's "low-mobility" population
- the elderly, the infirm and the poor without cars or other means of
fleeing the city, about 100,000 people.
At disaster planning meetings, he said, "the answer was often silence."
Inevitably, the involvement of dozens of agencies complicated the
response. FEMA and its parent agency, the Department of Homeland
Security, were in charge of coordinating 14 federal agencies with state
and local authorities. But Mayor C. Ray Nagin of New Orleans complained
Wednesday on CNN that there were too many cooks involved.
Unlike a terrorist attack or an earthquake, Hurricane Katrina gave
considerable notice of its arrival. It was on Thursday, Aug. 25, that a
tropical storm that had formed in the Bahamas reached hurricane strength
and got its name.
The same day, Katrina made landfall in Florida, dumping up to 18 inches
of rain. It then moved slowly out over the warm waters of the Gulf of
Mexico, growing by the hour.
Though its path remained uncertain, the Gulf Coast was clearly
threatened, with New Orleans a possible target. Officials from the
Pentagon, the National Guard, the Army Corps of Engineers, FEMA and the
Homeland Security Department said they were taking steps to prepare for
the hurricane's arrival.
Army Corps personnel, in charge of maintaining the levees in New
Orleans, started to secure the locks, floodgates and other equipment,
said Greg Breerwood, deputy district engineer for project management at
the Army Corps of Engineers.
"We knew if it was going to be a Category 5, some levees and some flood
walls would be overtopped," he said. "We never did think they would
actually be breached." The uncertainty of the storm's course affected
Pentagon planning.
"We did not have precision on where it would make landfall," said Lt.
Gen. H. Steven Blum, the head of the National Guard Bureau. "It could
have been anywhere from Texas all the way over to Florida."
Some 10,000 National Guard troops were mobilized, 7,000 of them in
Louisiana and Mississippi. But the Defense Department could not put
soldiers and equipment directly in the possible path of the storm,
General Blum said.
On Saturday, at the urging of FEMA, Mr. Bush declared an emergency in
Louisiana, allowing the agency to promise financial assistance to state
and local governments and to move ready-to-eat meals, medicine, ice,
tarpaulins, water and other supplies to the region.
By Sunday, Katrina had become a Category 5 hurricane, with winds of 175
miles per hour. The president extended the emergency declaration to
Mississippi and Alabama. Mayor Nagin, who had urged New Orleans
residents to flee on Saturday, ordered a mandatory evacuation.
It would have been up to local officials, a FEMA spokeswoman said, to
hire buses to move people without transportation out of the city.
Rodney Braxton, the chief lobbyist for New Orleans, said many of the
city's poorest "had nowhere to go outside the region and no way to get
there." He added: "And there wasn't enough police power to go to each
house to say, 'You have to go, come with me.' "
In a city with so many residents living in poverty, the hurricane came
at the worst possible time: the end of the month, when those depending
on public assistance are waiting for their next checks to be mailed on
the first of the month. Without the checks, many residents didn't have
money for gasoline, bus fare or lodging.
City officials said they provided free transportation from pick-up
points publicized on television, radio and by people shouting through
megaphones on the streets. In addition to the Superdome, officials
opened schools and the convention center as shelters.
Mr. Braxton said he believed the city was "aggressive enough" in
conducting the evacuation. "We had everything we thought we needed in
place," he said. "I don't think anybody could ever plan for the
magnitude that Katrina ended up being."
But Susan Cutter, a geography professor at the University of South
Carolina and an emergency preparedness expert, said Mayor Nagin should
have ordered a mandatory evacuation on Thursday or Friday.
"Evacuation is a precaution," she said. "I don't think they would have
taken a political hit if they had ordered it, and it helped."
While New Orleans residents fled the city or gathered in the Superdome,
federal agencies positioned search and rescue teams and medical
assistance teams from Tennessee to Texas, according to Michael Chertoff,
secretary of homeland security.
Before it made landfall on Monday, the storm turned slightly to the
east, avoiding a direct hit on New Orleans. The winds had eased slightly
to 140 miles per hour, reducing Katrina's strength to Category 4, and
officials counted themselves lucky.
But on Tuesday, when the levees breached, a desperate situation became
catastrophic. There was no fast way to fix them, Mr. Breerwood of the
Army Corps said, because delivery of heavy-duty equipment was hindered
by the destruction.
The National Guard was having similar troubles. While troops were
stationed in the region, they could not move quickly into the New
Orleans area. And in Mississippi, the zone of destruction was so
widespread, it was difficult to cover it all quickly, officials said.
"It is not a function of more people, but how many people can you move
on the road system that exists now in Louisiana and in Mississippi,"
said General Blum of the National Guard. "How many people can you put
through that funnel that a storm has taken four lane highways and turned
them into goat trails?"
On Wednesday, Mr. Bush, having cut short his vacation, convened a
federal task force. With looting spreading throughout New Orleans, Guard
officials said they were doubling the call by this weekend, to 21,000
forces, one-third of them military police officers. On Thursday, General
Blum said more than 32,000 Guard members would be deployed in the gulf
region by Monday.
Currently, the states' governors control their National Guard, with the
Pentagon and other federal agencies like FEMA, coordinating operations
with the state. The administration has resisted federalizing the relief
operation, in large part because officials say it would severely limit
the National Guard's ability to conduct law enforcement missions for
which they are specifically trained.
"Federalizing the National Guard for purposes of law enforcement would
be a last resort, not a first resort," said Paul McHale, assistant
secretary of defense for homeland security, told reporters on Thursday.
A 1878 law restricts active-duty military forces from performing
domestic law enforcement duties. But in extreme emergencies, like some
of the race riots and civil disorders in the 1960's, federal troops have
been sent in to restore order.
The administration has also balked at ordering active-duty military
forces, such as the 82nd Airborne Division from Fort Bragg, N.C., to
intervene in a civilian law enforcement role to stop looting and restore
order. Late Tuesday, the Pentagon dispatched five ships to the gulf, but
four of the ships are coming from Norfolk, Va., four days' sailing time
away.
Some military analysts criticized the Pentagon's response.
"Is the problem that they are only just now beginning to understand how
serious the damage was?" said John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity
..org, a national security policy group in Washington. "Did they not have
a contingency for a disaster of this magnitude?"
The chaotic response came despite repeated efforts over many years to
plan a coordinated defense if the worst should occur. As recently as
July 2004, federal, state and local officials cooperated on the
Hurricane Pam drill, which predicted 10 to 15 feet of water in parts of
the city and the evacuation of one million people.
Martha Madden, who was the Louisiana secretary of environmental quality
from 1987-1988, said that the potential for disaster was always obvious
and that "FEMA has known this for 20 years."
"Hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent, in studies,
training and contingency plans, scenarios, all of that," said Ms.
Madden, now a consultant in strategic planning.
The Army Corps, she said, should have had arrangements in place with
contractors who had emergency supplies at hand, like sandbags or
concrete barriers, the way that environmental planners have contracts to
handle oil spills.
While his agency is facing harsh criticism, Patrick Rhode, FEMA's deputy
director, defended its performance as "probably one of the most
efficient and effective responses in the country's history."
He recalled that after Mr. Brown, his boss, returned from his tsunami
tour, he asked if the United States was better prepared for a disaster
than the ravaged countries he had visited. "We felt relatively
comfortable that this country could mobilize the response necessary," he
said.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
I think if we had a three-word message right now it’d be, ‘We can do
better.’
- Howard Dean
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Gov Saw Flood Risk but not Levee Failure 02 Sep 2005 08:55:54 PM
I saw a well-done documentary on New Orleans on the History Channel a
few years ago and they predicted this exact situation - it really made
an impression on me and I have never forgotten it.
A high-level army official said today the levee is at the top of its
capability, meaning they could not have built one much better using
present-day technology.
http://www.amrivision.com/site_map.html
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER