Gun's kill right?



 Religions > Atheism > Gun's kill right?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "PerfectlyAble"
Date: 06 Nov 2006 02:11:21 AM
Object: Gun's kill right?
So people die if shot? Drop a bomb on a town,
hundreds die, right? Drop a nuke on a world city?
Millions, right? A asteroid smashes into the planet
a sizeable percentage of the worlds human population
dies? Right? Ok, so a super nova goes off in our
part of the galaxy, we all fryed right! So the universe
ain't all that safe for human kind
So heres my point. Religion is used by believers to
deal with some anxiety, some anx that their reasoning
capacities can't, won't, deal with. A close loved one
death, their own finality, a close encounter with
disaster. So when Religious people talk about
the universe being just so, just right for human life,
that the great lottery paidoff for us, shouldn't we
atleast wonder that its not just denial. That
the anthropic principle is just a way humanity
invents a way to deny its universal irrelevence in
the wide cosmos.
My point is this, how can we ever trust an individual
whose too cowardly to face reality square on. Who
instead of acting reasonable, turns away from it.
Who instead of dealing with the hard questions
buries themselves in stay the course biblical teachings.
As our race moves ever closer to population saturation,
even some say we have already past sustainable levels,
don't we need leaders that can suck it in and turnup
to the battle field, not dive for the potholes in fear.
America, especially, but the world isn't dealing with the
problem but is more in denial than ever. Religion is
there with welcome arms to provide comfort, a
false reality. One that will kill us all, or atleast most of
our grandkids. Americas war on terror without a war on
religion, our tolerance for liberalism and theism, harms
our ability to survive the coming turmoils. We need
a new direction. Guns don't kill, people who don't know
how to use them, don't want to know how to, don't
care to know, people who are afraid to know, happy
with the comfort that owning a gun but not willing to
bear the cost of thinking of the consequences.
As America turns from evolution, sciences, from
stem cells, to global warming, to creationism and
arks dragging dinosaurs around in twos. We all face
oblivion, not in 50 years in a rapture, but from our
own lack of vision, own own cowardice, our own
collective faithfulness to religious dogma.
.

User: "Lucifer"

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 06 Nov 2006 03:30:01 PM
No, I kill people...
*evil smirk*
--
Lucifer the Unsubtle, EAC Librarian of Dark Tomes of Excessive Evil and
General Purpose Igor
The Anti-Theist
"Don't worry, I won't bite.......hard"
.
User: "-Phil Clemence"

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 07 Nov 2006 02:50:19 AM
"Lucifer" <wyrdology@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162848601.305336.64980@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...

No, I kill people...
*evil smirk*

--

Lucifer the Unsubtle, EAC Librarian of Dark Tomes of Excessive Evil and
General Purpose Igor

The Anti-Theist

"Don't worry, I won't bite.......hard"

Man , this thread is what comes of being aware of so much going on and
caring what happens.
Well, you can't 'unknow' or 'uncare', so you have to post.
I can't suggest much except to try to control your anxiety and frustration
with intention.
You don't seem like the type to be happy escaping through alcohol or going
to live in the woods.
Maybe you are very cynical (as I am).
My mood has been tempered by learning a lot of facts about a wide range of
things.
I have a different perspective. I am still angry and frustrated, but it is
limited to those things which deserve anger and frustration. It has allowed
me to love what deserves love and hate what deserves hate, and relax about
things that don't matter. Sure it is all very subjective - based only on my
perspective from what I know.
Maybe you think I don't know much.
Well, it is enough to keep me from ranting endlessly about things I know
very little about because i focus on only one or two aspects and/or can't
see what else they affect and in what ways.
We have a lot of problems - don't waste time on those that are not very
important.
None of us have enough time or means to correct all these problems.
It is fine to rant once in a while, but there is no point in arguing the
fine points of hundreds of problems and doing nothing else. Yes posting is
doing something, but what is the point in arguing?
It is very rare to win an argument (I mean convince someone of what you
think)
There is no one to judge your arguments and announce a winner.
I am not saying you have to go out and fix some problem - I am just talking
about not wasting your life or others' lives or putting a gun to your own
head.
Now go get laid or study history ... both will make you calm afterwards -
history is much safer.
-Phil Clemence

.
User: "Lucifer"

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 07 Nov 2006 06:05:29 AM
-Phil Clemence wrote:

"Lucifer" <wyrdology@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162848601.305336.64980@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...

No, I kill people...
*evil smirk*

--

Lucifer the Unsubtle, EAC Librarian of Dark Tomes of Excessive Evil and
General Purpose Igor

The Anti-Theist

"Don't worry, I won't bite.......hard"


Man , this thread is what comes of being aware of so much going on and
caring what happens.
Well, you can't 'unknow' or 'uncare', so you have to post.
I can't suggest much except to try to control your anxiety and frustration
with intention.
You don't seem like the type to be happy escaping through alcohol or going
to live in the woods.
Maybe you are very cynical (as I am).
My mood has been tempered by learning a lot of facts about a wide range of
things.
I have a different perspective. I am still angry and frustrated, but it is
limited to those things which deserve anger and frustration. It has allowed
me to love what deserves love and hate what deserves hate, and relax about
things that don't matter. Sure it is all very subjective - based only on my
perspective from what I know.
Maybe you think I don't know much.
Well, it is enough to keep me from ranting endlessly about things I know
very little about because i focus on only one or two aspects and/or can't
see what else they affect and in what ways.
We have a lot of problems - don't waste time on those that are not very
important.
None of us have enough time or means to correct all these problems.
It is fine to rant once in a while, but there is no point in arguing the
fine points of hundreds of problems and doing nothing else. Yes posting is
doing something, but what is the point in arguing?
It is very rare to win an argument (I mean convince someone of what you
think)
There is no one to judge your arguments and announce a winner.

I am not saying you have to go out and fix some problem - I am just talking
about not wasting your life or others' lives or putting a gun to your own
head.

Now go get laid or study history ... both will make you calm afterwards -
history is much safer.

-Phil Clemence

Done both, history just makes me angry...
.
User: "-Phil Clemence"

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 08 Nov 2006 01:46:21 AM
"Lucifer" <wyrdology@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162901129.567116.123890@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...


-Phil Clemence wrote:

"Lucifer" <wyrdology@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1162848601.305336.64980@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...

No, I kill people...
*evil smirk*

--

Lucifer the Unsubtle, EAC Librarian of Dark Tomes of Excessive Evil and
General Purpose Igor

The Anti-Theist

"Don't worry, I won't bite.......hard"


Man , this thread is what comes of being aware of so much going on and
caring what happens.
Well, you can't 'unknow' or 'uncare', so you have to post.
I can't suggest much except to try to control your anxiety and
frustration
with intention.
You don't seem like the type to be happy escaping through alcohol or
going
to live in the woods.
Maybe you are very cynical (as I am).
My mood has been tempered by learning a lot of facts about a wide range
of
things.
I have a different perspective. I am still angry and frustrated, but it
is
limited to those things which deserve anger and frustration. It has
allowed
me to love what deserves love and hate what deserves hate, and relax
about
things that don't matter. Sure it is all very subjective - based only on
my
perspective from what I know.
Maybe you think I don't know much.
Well, it is enough to keep me from ranting endlessly about things I know
very little about because i focus on only one or two aspects and/or can't
see what else they affect and in what ways.
We have a lot of problems - don't waste time on those that are not very
important.
None of us have enough time or means to correct all these problems.
It is fine to rant once in a while, but there is no point in arguing the
fine points of hundreds of problems and doing nothing else. Yes posting
is
doing something, but what is the point in arguing?
It is very rare to win an argument (I mean convince someone of what you
think)
There is no one to judge your arguments and announce a winner.

I am not saying you have to go out and fix some problem - I am just
talking
about not wasting your life or others' lives or putting a gun to your own
head.

Now go get laid or study history ... both will make you calm afterwards -
history is much safer.

-Phil Clemence


Done both, history just makes me angry...

Hehe it does me too, but I am not as mad at us here today.I think we are
doing better, but change now can be more radical, so we just have to be
careful ;)
Oh, and I was replying to the whole thread, not just you reply - i meant to
note that~~
-Phil Clemence
.




User: "Scotius"

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 08 Nov 2006 07:59:05 PM
On 6 Nov 2006 00:11:21 -0800, "PerfectlyAble" <jrhw@kol.co.nz> wrote:

So people die if shot? Drop a bomb on a town,
hundreds die, right? Drop a nuke on a world city?
Millions, right? A asteroid smashes into the planet
a sizeable percentage of the worlds human population
dies? Right? Ok, so a super nova goes off in our
part of the galaxy, we all fryed right! So the universe
ain't all that safe for human kind

So heres my point. Religion is used by believers to
deal with some anxiety, some anx that their reasoning
capacities can't, won't, deal with. A close loved one
death, their own finality, a close encounter with
disaster. So when Religious people talk about
the universe being just so, just right for human life,
that the great lottery paidoff for us, shouldn't we
atleast wonder that its not just denial. That
the anthropic principle is just a way humanity
invents a way to deny its universal irrelevence in
the wide cosmos.

My point is this, how can we ever trust an individual
whose too cowardly to face reality square on. Who
instead of acting reasonable, turns away from it.
Who instead of dealing with the hard questions
buries themselves in stay the course biblical teachings.

Firstly, God didn't tell George Bush to "strike at" Iraq, and
secondly, there's nothing Biblical about what the SOB is doing. I
suspect usually when someone says something like this that they're
trying to make hay out of some Bushisms. Please. Bush's "base" is the
wealthiest 1%. That's what he said at a dinner party where he was busy
kissing their asses, and that's who they are.

As our race moves ever closer to population saturation,
even some say we have already past sustainable levels,
don't we need leaders that can suck it in and turnup
to the battle field, not dive for the potholes in fear.

America, especially, but the world isn't dealing with the
problem but is more in denial than ever. Religion is
there with welcome arms to provide comfort, a
false reality. One that will kill us all, or atleast most of
our grandkids. Americas war on terror without a war on
religion, our tolerance for liberalism and theism, harms
our ability to survive the coming turmoils. We need
a new direction.

Kind of like the "National Alliance" or "National Vanguard"
people suggest?

Guns don't kill, people who don't know
how to use them, don't want to know how to, don't
care to know, people who are afraid to know, happy
with the comfort that owning a gun but not willing to
bear the cost of thinking of the consequences.

As America turns from evolution, sciences, from
stem cells, to global warming, to creationism and
arks dragging dinosaurs around in twos. We all face
oblivion, not in 50 years in a rapture, but from our
own lack of vision, own own cowardice, our own
collective faithfulness to religious dogma.

Religious dogma isn't what's killing the planet, and by the
way, Christians respect creation and don't support the idea that
pollution in the magnitude it now exists is a necessary evil.
.
User: "PerfectlyAble"

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 09 Nov 2006 10:05:50 AM
Scotius wrote:

On 6 Nov 2006 00:11:21 -0800, "PerfectlyAble" <jrhw@kol.co.nz> wrote:

So people die if shot? Drop a bomb on a town,
hundreds die, right? Drop a nuke on a world city?
Millions, right? A asteroid smashes into the planet
a sizeable percentage of the worlds human population
dies? Right? Ok, so a super nova goes off in our
part of the galaxy, we all fryed right! So the universe
ain't all that safe for human kind

So heres my point. Religion is used by believers to
deal with some anxiety, some anx that their reasoning
capacities can't, won't, deal with. A close loved one
death, their own finality, a close encounter with
disaster. So when Religious people talk about
the universe being just so, just right for human life,
that the great lottery paidoff for us, shouldn't we
atleast wonder that its not just denial. That
the anthropic principle is just a way humanity
invents a way to deny its universal irrelevence in
the wide cosmos.

My point is this, how can we ever trust an individual
whose too cowardly to face reality square on. Who
instead of acting reasonable, turns away from it.
Who instead of dealing with the hard questions
buries themselves in stay the course biblical teachings.


Firstly, God didn't tell George Bush to "strike at" Iraq, and
secondly, there's nothing Biblical about what the SOB is doing. I
suspect usually when someone says something like this that they're
trying to make hay out of some Bushisms. Please. Bush's "base" is the
wealthiest 1%. That's what he said at a dinner party where he was busy
kissing their asses, and that's who they are.

I have never commented on what Bush and God talk about.
America is a Democracy where one person gets one vote.
Bush is the religious voters candidate, his block loyal base
of voters are your bible bashers. Bush himself
declared he was a very Religious man. Religious people like
him are biblical, they couldn't ignore the fact that Israel exists.
Israel is Biblical, Foriegn US policy thus has to be seen
throuugh the prism of Bush's beliefs, which are biblical!
So your strawman is summedup, because
the wealthiest 1% back whoevers in power to maximises their
profitability, and you seem to believe this is wrong since we
capitalists need 'tools' like them to get capital into the hands
of businesses. Bush is a SOB, but hey ignorance and stupidity
have a place in society. Science takes all the good predictable
stuff and leaves the wiseful thinkers, the religious, to the
remainders.
i.e. stupid.

As our race moves ever closer to population saturation,
even some say we have already past sustainable levels,
don't we need leaders that can suck it in and turnup
to the battle field, not dive for the potholes in fear.

America, especially, but the world isn't dealing with the
problem but is more in denial than ever. Religion is
there with welcome arms to provide comfort, a
false reality. One that will kill us all, or atleast most of
our grandkids. Americas war on terror without a war on
religion, our tolerance for liberalism and theism, harms
our ability to survive the coming turmoils. We need
a new direction.


Kind of like the "National Alliance" or "National Vanguard"
people suggest?

Who? Religion should only be respected to the degree that
it does good. In fact I believe most people take religion with
a pinch of salt precisely because they can't see the value
in Religion. Because for the most part, Demcoracy, Science,
Technology, Politics, Philosophy all do a better job than
religion. In fact religion is what we all collectively believe
and one thing we don't see eye to eye onn is if there is a
God then nobody agrees on the right religious dogma to
find God. Religion is fragmented. The fact that there has
always been a rump of atheists about 10% (who the more
religious a scoeity the more they sya they believe to get along).
Suggests two things, God wants atheists around, or that
atheists ignoring God soaked nonsense is right. Given the
success of science I go for the latter (Okcams razer).


Guns don't kill, people who don't know
how to use them, don't want to know how to, don't
care to know, people who are afraid to know, happy
with the comfort that owning a gun but not willing to
bear the cost of thinking of the consequences.

As America turns from evolution, sciences, from
stem cells, to global warming, to creationism and
arks dragging dinosaurs around in twos. We all face
oblivion, not in 50 years in a rapture, but from our
own lack of vision, own own cowardice, our own
collective faithfulness to religious dogma.


Religious dogma isn't what's killing the planet, and by the
way, Christians respect creation and don't support the idea that
pollution in the magnitude it now exists is a necessary evil.

Christians wouldn't support something nobody in their right
mind would, thats supposed to give me comfort. Christianity
teaches that God gave Man domination over Nature.
Christians still tell us how practical it is to send money to
third world countries so that they can help the children?
Yeah, dump hard currency, destroy indigenious networks of
exchange, teach children God not science is their saviour
and low and behold decades of systemic poverty later.
Those evil 1% of capitalists, that spend their whole lives
chasing the greenback, worried they will lose their hair along
with their money, all to make the capitalist market place work.
Well true evil declares such worthy people, people who
take risks to match demand to supply, that love their work,
if they weren't there we'd have to invent them. I do
not believe in a God, I believe we have one life, and if
people want to be rewarded for making money, using their
one life up chasing the market to keep our food prices
down and constant, then so be it. Who ever said money was
the root of all evil was a moron. Irrationalism is the root.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 09 Nov 2006 11:54:46 AM
Hahah you make me laff, you insist to me that you are not preaching
hatred for the relgious, but your langauge tells me that you are a liar.
.
User: "PerfectlyAble"

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 09 Nov 2006 01:01:58 PM
wrote:

Hahah you make me laff, you insist to me that you are not preaching
hatred for the relgious, but your langauge tells me that you are a liar.

You love the word hate. I never used it. If you cared about
how religion has failed us all then you would refrain from
you obvious trolling ad homs and fight fair.
PLONK
.
User: "-Phil Clemence"

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 09 Nov 2006 10:37:26 PM
"PerfectlyAble" <jrhw@kol.co.nz> wrote in message
news:1163098918.073900.186140@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...


lee@rdfmedia.com wrote:

Hahah you make me laff, you insist to me that you are not preaching
hatred for the relgious, but your langauge tells me that you are a liar.


You love the word hate. I never used it. If you cared about
how religion has failed us all then you would refrain from
you obvious trolling ad homs and fight fair.

PLONK

May I have one of those,too?
Thanks.
-Phil Clemence
.





User: ""

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 06 Nov 2006 12:24:59 PM
PerfectlyAble wrote:\

As our race moves ever closer to population saturation,
even some say we have already past sustainable levels,
don't we need leaders that can suck it in and turnup
to the battle field, not dive for the potholes in fear.

Religion exists for the identical reason as the above fucking idiotic
trash exists, i.e. the acceptance of ideas without any evidence,
without any evidence for the acceptance of those ideas.
There is absolutely NO, absolutely no evidence at all, absolutely no
sensory evidence at all of a god and there is NONE what so ever that so
called *population saturation* is happening, nor is there any evidence
at all that it is getting anywhere near such a thing.
FACT the entire population of the world could exist in the state of
Texas and it would still be only half as busy as Paris.
What absolute fucking idiotic claptrap, how fucking dare you have a
crack at the dopey mystics when what you promote is as equally and as
identically as fucking stupid as anything that any mystic has ever used
for their evidence of a god NOTHING.
You fucking dumb goose.
And only silly Tracy and dumb arsed kev and chaz and Ryan and Tim and
tg and Topaz would care two fucks that you ever contribute here again.
***** you god dambed clown, the world needs another you like it
needs another god.
Michael Gordge
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 06 Nov 2006 05:51:16 AM
What a load of rubbish,
I would ask as did the OP about who we place our trust in also. Do we
place it in those closed minded indivuals who see relgion only in terms
of the Christian Bible?
Or perhaps those people that make unsubstanciated claims, reached via
their subjective personal experiance, and pass these of as truth.
No? What about, those that incite hatred for those whos view of life
is differant from therse.
Yeah perhaps we should place our trust in those calling for the
abolishment of religion as dangerous, or thoses that tell us our mental
facilites are somehow inpeared, because of a differance in belife, yeah
place our trust in the thought police who only want you think one way,
their way.
Umm no thanks.
.
User: "PerfectlyAble"

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 06 Nov 2006 11:23:46 AM
wrote:

What a load of rubbish,

I would ask as did the OP about who we place our trust in also. Do we
place it in those closed minded indivuals who see relgion only in terms
of the Christian Bible?

Strawman.

Or perhaps those people that make unsubstanciated claims, reached via
their subjective personal experiance, and pass these of as truth.

That is science you arse. Absolute truth never carried out brain
surgury.

No? What about, those that incite hatred for those whos view of life
is differant from therse.

Hatred! Hatred! Self-defence! You idiots are destroying the world.

Yeah perhaps we should place our trust in those calling for the
abolishment of religion as dangerous, or thoses that tell us our mental
facilites are somehow inpeared, because of a differance in belife, yeah
place our trust in the thought police who only want you think one way,
their way.

I never said you could get rid of terrorism, or religion. I
know how much effort you must have given religion and
should of expected that denialistic anxiety would immediately
surface. But I not asking you to give up your faith, just
dose it down with heaps of reasonableness. Religion is
not the be all and end. Science, that subjective art passed
as truth has far outstripped religion as religion! Nolonger
do we rush to the temple to sacrifice our first born, or
dance naked around the forest tree, or eat flesh and blood
of our saviour, no we rush to the emergency ward, we down
evolutionary prescribe medicines, we board planes not
checking with the preists of Jesus but the preists of Engineering.
Just as religions have died before, so Jesus should,
dying overloaded with rationalism. The new religion, whose
to say, but in clear that a mono-theism ain't cutting it.
People will continue to worship Thor, or Jesus, or the
Pharoah, it doesn't matter. What matters is the public
marketplace gives them equal credance.



Umm no thanks.

.
User: ""

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 06 Nov 2006 12:14:22 PM

What a load of rubbish,
I would ask as did the OP about who we place our trust in also. Do we
place it in those closed minded indivuals who see relgion only in terms
of the Christian Bible?

Strawman.
Ohh really, then lets see just what you wrote to prompt my replies huh.
You: 'Who instead of dealing with the hard questions buries themselves
in stay the course biblical teachings.' No meantion there of Toranic
teachings or, Qabalaic, or Koranic, nope just Biblical.

Or perhaps those people that make unsubstanciated claims, reached via
their subjective personal experiance, and pass these of as truth.

That is science you arse. Absolute truth never carried out brain
surgury.
Ohh really?
You: 'So heres my point. Religion is used by believers to deal with
some anxiety, some anx that their reasoning capacities can't, won't,
deal with. A close loved one death, their own finality, a close
encounter with disaster. So when Religious people talk about
the universe being just so, just right for human life, that the great
lottery paidoff for us, shouldn't we atleast wonder that its not just
denial.'
You can of course back up these opinions with cold emperical absolute
proof then?

No? What about, those that incite hatred for those whos view of life
is differant from therse.

Hatred! Hatred! Self-defence! You idiots are destroying the world.
You don't even no me, nor my faith nor nowt about it so what branch of
idiot do you assume I am then?
Hatred no?
You: 'America, especially, but the world isn't dealing with the
problem but is more in denial than ever. Religion is there with welcome
arms to provide comfort, a false reality. One that will kill us all, or
atleast most of our grandkids.'
So this isn't a call against the relgious then?

Yeah perhaps we should place our trust in those calling for the
abolishment of religion as dangerous, or thoses that tell us our mental
facilites are somehow inpeared, because of a differance in belife, yeah
place our trust in the thought police who only want you think one way,
their way.

I never said you could get rid of terrorism, or religion. I know how
much effort you must have given religion and should of expected that
denialistic anxiety would immediately
surface. But I not asking you to give up your faith, just dose it down
with heaps of reasonableness. Religion is not the be all and end.
Science, that subjective art passed
as truth has far outstripped religion as religion! Nolonger do we rush
to the temple to sacrifice our first born, or dance naked around the
forest tree, or eat flesh and blood
of our saviour, no we rush to the emergency ward, we down evolutionary
prescribe medicines, we board planes not checking with the preists of
Jesus but the preists of Engineering.
Just as religions have died before, so Jesus should, dying overloaded
with rationalism. The new religion, whose to say, but in clear that a
mono-theism ain't cutting it.
People will continue to worship Thor, or Jesus, or the Pharoah, it
doesn't matter. What matters is the public marketplace gives them equal
credance.
Fair enough then, but to everybody that agrees with that Dawkins fellow
I would say first prove to me that religious thought is alien to
humaity, that is it is not normal, or so called rational though process
are the norm. Then perhaps I'd listen to this anti religious rhetoric.
Although not for long as I firmly belive that anybody who says there
is only one way and this is it should be avioded at all costs.
.
User: "PerfectlyAble"

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 06 Nov 2006 01:24:37 PM
wrote:

What a load of rubbish,


I would ask as did the OP about who we place our trust in also. Do we
place it in those closed minded indivuals who see relgion only in terms
of the Christian Bible?


Strawman.

Ohh really, then lets see just what you wrote to prompt my replies huh.

You: 'Who instead of dealing with the hard questions buries themselves
in stay the course biblical teachings.' No meantion there of Toranic
teachings or, Qabalaic, or Koranic, nope just Biblical.

Oh, yes you must be write I should of said "Who instead of dealing with
the hard questions buries themselves in stay the course biblical
teachings,
toranic teachings, qabalaic, koranic, thor, odin and fairy the fig
teachings.
Your misdirection is noted.


Or perhaps those people that make unsubstanciated claims, reached via
their subjective personal experiance, and pass these of as truth.


That is science you arse. Absolute truth never carried out brain
surgury.

Ohh really?

Pleas to ignorance require me to hold my nose.

You: 'So heres my point. Religion is used by believers to deal with
some anxiety, some anx that their reasoning capacities can't, won't,
deal with. A close loved one death, their own finality, a close
encounter with disaster. So when Religious people talk about
the universe being just so, just right for human life, that the great
lottery paidoff for us, shouldn't we atleast wonder that its not just
denial.'

You can of course back up these opinions with cold emperical absolute
proof then?

Well I would produce evidance if I thought you were open
to questioning you deepest held beliefs honestly. That
you were a sincere debater. No point in wasting time on
people who have a lockdown in operation.

No? What about, those that incite hatred for those whos view of life
is differant from therse.


Hatred! Hatred! Self-defence! You idiots are destroying the world.

You don't even no me, nor my faith nor nowt about it so what branch of
idiot do you assume I am then?

Your ad hom was match by mine. My mistake for diving to
your down to your level.


Hatred no?

You: 'America, especially, but the world isn't dealing with the
problem but is more in denial than ever. Religion is there with welcome
arms to provide comfort, a false reality. One that will kill us all, or
atleast most of our grandkids.'

So this isn't a call against the relgious then?

A false reality can be comfortable, that doesn't necessay
mean comfort isn't welcome. Only that false realities can
be delusional and hold us from much worse.


Yeah perhaps we should place our trust in those calling for the
abolishment of religion as dangerous, or thoses that tell us our mental
facilites are somehow inpeared, because of a differance in belife, yeah
place our trust in the thought police who only want you think one way,
their way.


I never said you could get rid of terrorism, or religion. I know how
much effort you must have given religion and should of expected that
denialistic anxiety would immediately
surface. But I not asking you to give up your faith, just dose it down
with heaps of reasonableness. Religion is not the be all and end.
Science, that subjective art passed
as truth has far outstripped religion as religion! Nolonger do we rush
to the temple to sacrifice our first born, or dance naked around the
forest tree, or eat flesh and blood
of our saviour, no we rush to the emergency ward, we down evolutionary
prescribe medicines, we board planes not checking with the preists of
Jesus but the preists of Engineering.
Just as religions have died before, so Jesus should, dying overloaded
with rationalism. The new religion, whose to say, but in clear that a
mono-theism ain't cutting it.
People will continue to worship Thor, or Jesus, or the Pharoah, it
doesn't matter. What matters is the public marketplace gives them equal
credance.

Fair enough then, but to everybody that agrees with that Dawkins fellow
I would say first prove to me that religious thought is alien to
humaity, that is it is not normal, or so called rational though process
are the norm. Then perhaps I'd listen to this anti religious rhetoric.
Although not for long as I firmly belive that anybody who says there
is only one way and this is it should be avioded at all costs.

Thought about religion aren't alien, they are the stepping stones
of cultural evolution that brought us here. If you want to disagree
with Darwin, Dawkins, do yourself a favour and understand what
they are talking about. Its obvious that science has to explain the
emergence of religion, religion to my mind is merely an embroyic
stage of science, art, politics, law and civility rolled up. The
aborigines of Australia, dreamtime, is a living example of just
such a stem cell, if you will. There is a place for religion
in society, comfort against psyhocological damage where
the patient is unable or unwillling to reason there way out of
their pain. The Buddha teaches that all suffering is desire,
all desire suffering. But just like cells can go cancerous
so can religion. When Religion stands in the way, blockages
the public space with nonsense, then religion might as well
be dispensed with. i.e. massive chemo to kill the cancer.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 07 Nov 2006 06:09:27 AM
Ohh I undestand now, how silly of me, I started attacking you, when all
you done was post perfectly good item about how religoin should be
wiped from the face of the Earth.
I do applogise I of course should have said nowt and just let this go
unremarked, I mean how stupid can I be, my brain clearly does not work
right, and I should just pop off now to my local euthenasia centre.
In a nuts hell this is why i choose not to do the above. You said:

Thought about religion aren't alien, they are the stepping stones
of cultural evolution that brought us here. If you want to disagree
with Darwin, Dawkins, do yourself a favour and understand what
they are talking about. Its obvious that science has to explain the
emergence of religion, religion to my mind is merely an embroyic
stage of science, art, politics, law and civility rolled up. The
aborigines of Australia, dreamtime, is a living example of just
such a stem cell, if you will. There is a place for religion
in society, comfort against psyhocological damage where
the patient is unable or unwillling to reason there way out of
their pain. The Buddha teaches that all suffering is desire,
all desire suffering. But just like cells can go cancerous
so can religion. When Religion stands in the way, blockages
the public space with nonsense, then religion might as well
be dispensed with. i.e. massive chemo to kill the cancer.

Which is fine, if you want to preach intolorence and hatred for a
group, it woil;d also be fine, if you could show why this is true and
not just your opininion. But you don't, because you can't. So the
question remains are not the views expressd here by you similar to
other views expressed in the psat about how it was all the Jews faught
and we should get rid of them.
It sounds nasty, its sounds hatefull, and you what, it is nasty and it
is hatefull, and you accuse me of a lack of understanding. Sheesh
where do yu people come from?
.
User: "PerfectlyAble"

Title: Re: Gun's kill right? 08 Nov 2006 04:20:56 AM
wrote:

Ohh I undestand now, how silly of me, I started attacking you, when all
you done was post perfectly good item about how religoin should be
wiped from the face of the Earth.

strawman, the current religious setup sucks doesm't mean all
religion does.

I do applogise I of course should have said nowt and just let this go
unremarked, I mean how stupid can I be, my brain clearly does not work
right, and I should just pop off now to my local euthenasia centre.

Assumption is like consumption, pleasure but no reward.

In a nuts hell this is why i choose not to do the above. You said:

Thought about religion aren't alien, they are the stepping stones
of cultural evolution that brought us here. If you want to disagree
with Darwin, Dawkins, do yourself a favour and understand what
they are talking about. Its obvious that science has to explain the
emergence of religion, religion to my mind is merely an embroyic
stage of science, art, politics, law and civility rolled up. The
aborigines of Australia, dreamtime, is a living example of just
such a stem cell, if you will. There is a place for religion
in society, comfort against psyhocological damage where
the patient is unable or unwillling to reason there way out of
their pain. The Buddha teaches that all suffering is desire,
all desire suffering. But just like cells can go cancerous
so can religion. When Religion stands in the way, blockages
the public space with nonsense, then religion might as well
be dispensed with. i.e. massive chemo to kill the cancer.


Which is fine, if you want to preach intolorence and hatred for a
group, it woil;d also be fine, if you could show why this is true and
not just your opininion. But you don't, because you can't. So the
question remains are not the views expressd here by you similar to
other views expressed in the psat about how it was all the Jews faught
and we should get rid of them.

I don't preach intolerance, but tolarence doesn't mean acceptance.
But hey, you have a denialist frame for dissent that harkens back to
the dream of the thousand year reich, so what do I know.

It sounds nasty, its sounds hatefull, and you what, it is nasty and it
is hatefull, and you accuse me of a lack of understanding. Sheesh
where do yu people come from?

Desire is suffering. Suffering desire. The unreflected life is
not worth living. Buddha and Socretes, none of your monotheistic
crap-tology. Ego restrained theology,
.







  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Columbine Victim's Dad: Say Yes to God, No to Gun Control!
Re: USS Liberty: WE HAVE THE SMOKING GUN!
Will the Liberals Once Again Gun Down Common Sense?
Will the Liberals Once Again Gun Down Common Sense?
=> Babble-thumpin' Pistol-packin' Pastor indicted by Grand Jury for Illegal Gun Possession ...! <=
OT: In Darfur, the UN veto is proving as deadly as the gun
Kerry To Stop All Terrorists With Strict Gun Control Laws! (I'M LAUGHING MY ***** OFF!)
Re: Under the Gun
Theocracy at the end of the gun
OT: Nagin's jumping the gun...
Gun nuts pass "Shoot First Law"
Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS ARE COMPLETE MORONS ==> Alaska Abandons Gun Permits - Empowers People
Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS ARE MORONS ==> => In a global first, Brazilians voting on banning gun sales
Re: ALL LIBERALS ARE IGNORANT PUSS BRAINS!!!!! ==> Buy A Gun For Christmas
United 93 Brought Down by Gun Control Laws
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER