Hell Yes? or Hell No?



 Religions > Atheism > Hell Yes? or Hell No?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "dgillesp"
Date: 31 Jan 2004 10:50:29 AM
Object: Hell Yes? or Hell No?
When some reference to hell appears in posts on this NG (almost on a
daily basis), it almost invariably reflects a "hell" that doesn't come
so much from the Bible and theology, but rather from "Faust" and
cartoons, folklore, and popular cathedral art. So, if you would be
willing to humor one old Christian theist, by your leave I would
appreciate your consideration of another approach to the subject.
First of all, the Bible is inconclusive in its teaching on the subject
of hell which has resulted in three entirely different theories.
(1) CONDITIONAL IMMORTALITY holds that those who are lost will be
annihilated and cease to exist altogether, since God "alone has
immortality" (1 Tim. 6.16). The words 'perish', 'destruction,' and the
'second death' in reference to hell are understood as total extinction,
since God cannot allow evil to remain forever in His universe.
2 Thess. 2:10 "those who are to perish, because they refused to love the
truth and so to be saved."
Matt. 7:13 - "...the gate is wide and the way is easy, that leads to
destruction, and those who enter by it are many."
Rev. 2:11 - "He who conquers shall not be hurt by the second death."
(2) UNIVERSALISM declares that finally _all men_ will in some way be
saved and _all evil_ will be restored to its original state of goodness.
John 12:32 - [Jesus said] "and I, when I am lifted up from the earth,
will draw all men to myself."
Colossians 1:21-22 - " For in him [Christ] all the fullnes of God was
pleased to dwell, and through him to reconcile all things, whether on
earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross."
1 Tim. 2:4 - "God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to
come to the knowledge of the truth."
2 Pet. 3:9 - "The Lord ... is forebearing toward you, no wishing that
any should perish, but that all should come to repentance."
(3) ETERNAL TORMENT is the view that endless suffering will be the state
of the lost, and this based on rigid and literal interpretations of such
passages as:
Rev. 20:10 - "the devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of
fire and sulphur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they
will be tormented day and night for ever and ever."
Mark 9:47 - [Jesus said] "If your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out;
it is better for you to enter kingdom of God with one eye than with two
eyes to be thrown into hell, where their worm dos not die, and the first
is not quenched." The idea of eternal torment is one of the most
appalling conceptions which has ever afflicted man's mind. No normal
person can seriously hold it in regard to anyone they care for, and it's
high time for it to be abandoned by all Christians.
But the horror of hell remains, for hell is the complete and final ruin
of human personality. When we see people who feed on themselves in
malice, hate, meanness and evil, we get a clear glimpse of hell. Life
becomes rotten from within. A completely self-centered person is
usually quite self-satisfied and unaware of what real goodness is.
OTOH, Heaven is the joy of outgoing in love and fellowship and service
to others. Hell, its opposite, is a constant shriveling back into
self-love--the perishing of self in its own emptiness, a second death.
That's really about all that can be reasonably said from the Bible's
inconclusive teaching on the subject.
The difference between heaven and hell has been described this way. In
hell everyone is seated around a huge table with every imaginable good
thing one could want to eat. However, it must be eaten with very long
handled spoons, and everyone at table is sweating, straining, and in
great misery trying to get food into his mouth--but, alas, the spoon
handle is too long. In heaven is the same scenario, a table loaded with
delectible food of all imaginable sorts. However, there they all are
having a glorious time feeding each another with their long handled
spoons.
methodios (Denny)
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Hell Yes? or Hell No? 31 Jan 2004 12:12:59 PM
And so upon Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:50:29 -0500 didst dgillesp speak thusly:

First of all, the Bible is inconclusive in its teaching on the subject
of hell...

Or for that matter, on pretty much everything else.
Hell maybe!
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.

User: "Bill, The Avender"

Title: Re: Hell Yes? or Hell No? 31 Jan 2004 11:33:14 AM
In alt.atheism on Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:50:29 -0500, dgillesp
<dgillesp@pemtel.net> wrote:

When some reference to hell appears in posts on this NG (almost on a
daily basis), it almost invariably reflects a "hell" that doesn't come
so much from the Bible and theology, but rather from "Faust" and
cartoons, folklore, and popular cathedral art. So, if you would be
willing to humor one old Christian theist, by your leave I would
appreciate your consideration of another approach to the subject.

First of all, the Bible is inconclusive in its teaching on the subject
of hell which has resulted in three entirely different theories.

(1) CONDITIONAL IMMORTALITY holds that those who are lost will be
annihilated and cease to exist altogether, since God "alone has
immortality" (1 Tim. 6.16). The words 'perish', 'destruction,' and the
'second death' in reference to hell are understood as total extinction,
since God cannot allow evil to remain forever in His universe.
2 Thess. 2:10 "those who are to perish, because they refused to love the
truth and so to be saved."
Matt. 7:13 - "...the gate is wide and the way is easy, that leads to
destruction, and those who enter by it are many."
Rev. 2:11 - "He who conquers shall not be hurt by the second death."

(2) UNIVERSALISM declares that finally _all men_ will in some way be
saved and _all evil_ will be restored to its original state of goodness.
John 12:32 - [Jesus said] "and I, when I am lifted up from the earth,
will draw all men to myself."
Colossians 1:21-22 - " For in him [Christ] all the fullnes of God was
pleased to dwell, and through him to reconcile all things, whether on
earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross."
1 Tim. 2:4 - "God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to
come to the knowledge of the truth."
2 Pet. 3:9 - "The Lord ... is forebearing toward you, no wishing that
any should perish, but that all should come to repentance."

(3) ETERNAL TORMENT is the view that endless suffering will be the state
of the lost, and this based on rigid and literal interpretations of such
passages as:
Rev. 20:10 - "the devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of
fire and sulphur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they
will be tormented day and night for ever and ever."
Mark 9:47 - [Jesus said] "If your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out;
it is better for you to enter kingdom of God with one eye than with two
eyes to be thrown into hell, where their worm dos not die, and the first
is not quenched." The idea of eternal torment is one of the most
appalling conceptions which has ever afflicted man's mind. No normal
person can seriously hold it in regard to anyone they care for, and it's
high time for it to be abandoned by all Christians.

But the horror of hell remains, for hell is the complete and final ruin
of human personality. When we see people who feed on themselves in
malice, hate, meanness and evil, we get a clear glimpse of hell. Life
becomes rotten from within. A completely self-centered person is
usually quite self-satisfied and unaware of what real goodness is.
OTOH, Heaven is the joy of outgoing in love and fellowship and service
to others. Hell, its opposite, is a constant shriveling back into
self-love--the perishing of self in its own emptiness, a second death.
That's really about all that can be reasonably said from the Bible's
inconclusive teaching on the subject.

The difference between heaven and hell has been described this way. In
hell everyone is seated around a huge table with every imaginable good
thing one could want to eat. However, it must be eaten with very long
handled spoons, and everyone at table is sweating, straining, and in
great misery trying to get food into his mouth--but, alas, the spoon
handle is too long. In heaven is the same scenario, a table loaded with
delectible food of all imaginable sorts. However, there they all are
having a glorious time feeding each another with their long handled
spoons.

I've never heard this description before. It's actually kinda' kool -
not the Hell itself, but the visual verbiage this description elicits.
"The unattainable mandatory quest" version of Hell is one I'd been
told of as a child, and those kinds of "psychomeanderings" have always
been interesting for me.
That aside, I'm not quite sure how to take what you mean with regard
to the relationship between one's degree of selflessness and where one
ends up in the afterlife. Does it happen to be your view that a
selfless non-Christian could make it to Heaven without ever once
having believed in Jesus?
Apologies if you've dealt with this before with others, I usually tend
to the "flakey" threads and you usually don't. So I don't often get
to read your more serious posts.
I don't think we've talked much since the last you left and stayed
away for awhile. But it's nice to see you around again. C ya'! :-)
--
L8r,
Bill
/\~*`-\|~/.`\*=`~\/|.-`\=~`/\.|*-`\~*/.\|`=~`\-/.|=\`~*`\|/.-~\
"What I most admire about myself is my incurable narcissism."
/\~*`-\|~/.`\*=`~\/|.-`\=~`/\.|*-`\~*/.\|`=~`\-/.|=\`~*`\|/.-~\
.

User: "raven1"

Title: Re: Hell Yes? or Hell No? 31 Jan 2004 03:55:09 PM
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:50:29 -0500, dgillesp <dgillesp@pemtel.net>
wrote:

First of all, the Bible is inconclusive in its teaching on the subject
of hell which has resulted in three entirely different theories.

The Bible is inconclusive and/or internally contradictory on any
number of things, so why might this be a surprise?
.

User: "TheOne_The Only"

Title: Re: Hell Yes? or Hell No? 31 Jan 2004 10:56:02 AM
What
"dgillesp" <dgillesp@pemtel.net> wrote in message
news:401BDCD5.A23CCAB4@pemtel.net...

When some reference to hell appears in posts on this NG (almost on a
daily basis), it almost invariably reflects a "hell" that doesn't come
so much from the Bible and theology, but rather from "Faust" and
cartoons, folklore, and popular cathedral art. So, if you would be
willing to humor one old Christian theist, by your leave I would
appreciate your consideration of another approach to the subject.

First of all, the Bible is inconclusive in its teaching on the subject
of hell which has resulted in three entirely different theories.

(1) CONDITIONAL IMMORTALITY holds that those who are lost will be
annihilated and cease to exist altogether, since God "alone has
immortality" (1 Tim. 6.16). The words 'perish', 'destruction,' and the
'second death' in reference to hell are understood as total extinction,
since God cannot allow evil to remain forever in His universe.
2 Thess. 2:10 "those who are to perish, because they refused to love the
truth and so to be saved."
Matt. 7:13 - "...the gate is wide and the way is easy, that leads to
destruction, and those who enter by it are many."
Rev. 2:11 - "He who conquers shall not be hurt by the second death."

(2) UNIVERSALISM declares that finally _all men_ will in some way be
saved and _all evil_ will be restored to its original state of goodness.
John 12:32 - [Jesus said] "and I, when I am lifted up from the earth,
will draw all men to myself."
Colossians 1:21-22 - " For in him [Christ] all the fullnes of God was
pleased to dwell, and through him to reconcile all things, whether on
earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross."
1 Tim. 2:4 - "God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to
come to the knowledge of the truth."
2 Pet. 3:9 - "The Lord ... is forebearing toward you, no wishing that
any should perish, but that all should come to repentance."

(3) ETERNAL TORMENT is the view that endless suffering will be the state
of the lost, and this based on rigid and literal interpretations of such
passages as:
Rev. 20:10 - "the devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of
fire and sulphur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they
will be tormented day and night for ever and ever."
Mark 9:47 - [Jesus said] "If your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out;
it is better for you to enter kingdom of God with one eye than with two
eyes to be thrown into hell, where their worm dos not die, and the first
is not quenched." The idea of eternal torment is one of the most
appalling conceptions which has ever afflicted man's mind. No normal
person can seriously hold it in regard to anyone they care for, and it's
high time for it to be abandoned by all Christians.

But the horror of hell remains, for hell is the complete and final ruin
of human personality. When we see people who feed on themselves in
malice, hate, meanness and evil, we get a clear glimpse of hell. Life
becomes rotten from within. A completely self-centered person is
usually quite self-satisfied and unaware of what real goodness is.
OTOH, Heaven is the joy of outgoing in love and fellowship and service
to others. Hell, its opposite, is a constant shriveling back into
self-love--the perishing of self in its own emptiness, a second death.
That's really about all that can be reasonably said from the Bible's
inconclusive teaching on the subject.

The difference between heaven and hell has been described this way. In
hell everyone is seated around a huge table with every imaginable good
thing one could want to eat. However, it must be eaten with very long
handled spoons, and everyone at table is sweating, straining, and in
great misery trying to get food into his mouth--but, alas, the spoon
handle is too long. In heaven is the same scenario, a table loaded with
delectible food of all imaginable sorts. However, there they all are
having a glorious time feeding each another with their long handled
spoons.

methodios (Denny)

.

User: "The Great Hairy One the_great_hairy@yahoo yahoo! .com"

Title: Re: Hell Yes? or Hell No? 31 Jan 2004 05:15:37 PM
dgillesp wrote:
Gidday Denny,

When some reference to hell appears in posts on this NG (almost on a
daily basis), it almost invariably reflects a "hell" that doesn't come
so much from the Bible and theology, but rather from "Faust" and
cartoons, folklore, and popular cathedral art. So, if you would be
willing to humor one old Christian theist, by your leave I would
appreciate your consideration of another approach to the subject.

First of all, the Bible is inconclusive in its teaching on the subject
of hell which has resulted in three entirely different theories.

<snip theories>
Isn't it also true that many branches of religion have developed hell
far beyond any biblical references stated? I've read tracts where
various levels of hell, with named demons and devils, described torment
and so on, are gruesomely outlined, but have no actual biblical
standing.

But the horror of hell remains, for hell is the complete and final ruin
of human personality.

Surely then hell is a completely personal experience? And one that has
to be delt with and handled in this lifetime, not the next? Furthermore
then, the destination of one in the afterlife would also be a personal
decision rather than an arbitrary one.

When we see people who feed on themselves in
malice, hate, meanness and evil, we get a clear glimpse of hell.

But that assumes that the person in question has placed themselves in
hell - what if (to them) their acts are reasonable, honest and good?
Doesn't that make hell subjective?

Life
becomes rotten from within. A completely self-centered person is
usually quite self-satisfied and unaware of what real goodness is.

Again, how do you define "goodness"? To themselves, they may see
everything they do as perfectly good.

OTOH, Heaven is the joy of outgoing in love and fellowship and service
to others.

What about self? Is it removed/irrelevant in heaven?

Hell, its opposite, is a constant shriveling back into
self-love--the perishing of self in its own emptiness, a second death.

Why is self-love wrong? Surely a person must be able to understand and
be comfortable within themselves to love others. The old adage - love
oneself before one loves another - is quite true.

The difference between heaven and hell has been described this way. In
hell everyone is seated around a huge table with every imaginable good
thing one could want to eat. However, it must be eaten with very long
handled spoons, and everyone at table is sweating, straining, and in
great misery trying to get food into his mouth--but, alas, the spoon
handle is too long. In heaven is the same scenario, a table loaded with
delectible food of all imaginable sorts. However, there they all are
having a glorious time feeding each another with their long handled
spoons.

Interesting description - is it widely subscribed to?
--
The Great Hairy One,
ICQ: 118086514
All BAAWA and blue
SMASH! Aha! They'll save every one of us!
====================================
CEO EAC Roleplaying Division
Three cats and a demanding wife...
You think I have time to come up
with a humorous sig??
(Remove spam block to email)
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER