Hey, Atheists!



 Religions > Atheism > Hey, Atheists!

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "angelicusrex"
Date: 22 May 2004 01:49:03 AM
Object: Hey, Atheists!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
To: <whisperindave@pubertyallover.com>
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: I just...

Great Lord "angelicusrex"

Well, you got that part right anyway!

<whisperindave@pubertyallover.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Fri, 21 May 2004
17:49:41 -0700 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.

So you cretins now consider YOURSELVES god's, eh?

You pathetic child.

I am fifty years old, Berry. And I do not have time for your play-pen of a
group. Not one of you can even hold a logical thought in your head. This
e-mail to my private account proves to me that you are an illogical,
irrational creature of emotion and that you are totally unreasonable. Your
associates asked me time and time again to leave. As soon as I do, you want
to go to private e-mail and try to hit me again? Now that IS pathetic.

Haven

The word is HAVING. Use that IQ that you think you be haven.

been proven an idiot time and time again,
you have to give us more evidence?

So who proved me an idiot? I am an idiot only in the annals of one, lonely
NG in a huge conglomerate of cyber discussion groups. The only thing you
have proven is how tortured you all are. All you know how to do is verbally
crucify Christians. Since you have this single minded, idiotic,
semi-autistic or psychotic obsession, what more can a person do than leave
your group to it's own devices? Go gnaw on someone else's leg. I am not a
Christian. And I don't need an NG of the Living Brain Dead.

Thank you for leaving.

Your bloody welcome, now, would YOU please get off my *****, you hard-on!?

The average IQ in the room has risen several
points.

You mean it is now at + 2 or +3 instead of -26?

Now, if we could just get Duke to leave.

I hope Duke follows you all to your worthless graves.


--

Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail

All righty then!


"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."

Hmm, apparently Pascal never attended your NG!
Saint
.

User: "Therion Ware"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 02:20:13 AM
On Fri, 21 May 2004 23:49:03 -0700 in alt.atheism, angelicusrex
("angelicusrex" <whisperindave@msn.com>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism

----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
To: <whisperindave@pubertyallover.com>
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: I just...


Great Lord "angelicusrex"


Well, you got that part right anyway!

<whisperindave@pubertyallover.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Fri, 21 May 2004
17:49:41 -0700 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.


So you cretins now consider YOURSELVES god's, eh?

You pathetic child.


I am fifty years old, Berry. And I do not have time for your play-pen of a
group.

"So it seems....".
[snip rather desperate rant]
--
"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."
- Attrib: Pauline Reage.
Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion?
See: <http://www.Video2CD.com>. 35.00 gets your video on DVD.
all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read.
** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.
.
User: "angelicusrex"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 02:37:53 AM
I said: 'Not one of you can even hold a logical thought in your head. This
e-mail to my private account proves to me that you are an illogical,
irrational creature of emotion and that you are totally unreasonable.'
The above you consider "a rather desperate rant?" Something tells me you
simply didn't want to repeat the truth. I've been reading your posts on your
NG. Irrational is not strong enough a word. You people are psychotics and
hostile towards religion in a sense I would have only thought was the case
for Nazis. One of your associates says: "Go suck your priest's *****!" I love
how he took the fact that some priests FORCE sex on young people, and then
made it a hostile attack on all Catholics! Wow. Takes some real dynamic
trauma/tension to come up with such horrible abuse. Makes this guy as bad as
any degenerate priest ever was.
In the end you guys are like the Mafia calling other people "degenerate
gamblers!" Like that' somehow worse than being a professional murderer! You
people are plain freaks. You're not atheists. Your just losers with no voice
in the real world, so you spread your insane ideas around, just like the
radical religionists do!
You people are all pathetic. I wouldn't stay on this NG on a bet. But I
figure since every time I try to say goodbye you have to post more garbage
to start a fight, I'd have this last word ON your NG FROM your NG. What a
garbage can it is. So just keep your garbage in here.
Saint

[snip rather desperately dull disparagement]

Don't worry, Therion, no one is going to fight with you. I just wanted you
to know that snipping the truth is just another stupid act on your part.
.
User: "Therion Ware"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 04:38:07 AM
On Sat, 22 May 2004 00:37:53 -0700 iangelicusrex ("angelicusrex"
<whisperindave@msn.com>) wrote:

I said: 'Not one of you can even hold a logical thought in your head. This
e-mail to my private account proves to me that you are an illogical,
irrational creature of emotion and that you are totally unreasonable.'

Really David? That you're unable to differentiate between email and
usenet raises my suspicions somewhat.

The above you consider "a rather desperate rant?" Something tells me you
simply didn't want to repeat the truth. I've been reading your posts on your
NG.

Well of course. After all, one imagines that you'd like to pick up
writing style pointers and so forth.

Irrational is not strong enough a word.

Really? How rational is the one who announces he has no time to
participate in such games, and then goes on to do precisely that?

You people are psychotics and
hostile towards religion in a sense I would have only thought was the case
for Nazis.

Oh my dear - the Nazi's were rather keen on religion - providing it
was their version - blood, soil, and all that. Still, at least in
that, like most Christian sects, most of the time there's a certain
commonality.

One of your associates says: "Go suck your priest's *****!" I love
how he took the fact that some priests FORCE sex on young people, and then
made it a hostile attack on all Catholics! Wow. Takes some real dynamic
trauma/tension to come up with such horrible abuse. Makes this guy as bad as
any degenerate priest ever was.

Does it? Taking that argument at face value, it seems logical to
suppose that all Catholics - approving as they do of the unending
torture of some people, are morally rather worse than those who - to
continue your Nazi simile - knew of the camps, but never-the-less
continued to support the Nazi government.

In the end you guys are like the Mafia calling other people "degenerate
gamblers!" Like that' somehow worse than being a professional murderer! You
people are plain freaks. You're not atheists. Your just losers with no voice
in the real world, so you spread your insane ideas around, just like the
radical religionists do!

I really don't think I need any opinions on rationality from a man who
finds it profitable to exploit the current fashion for all things
angelic. How rational is promising "deep, spiritual transformation and
contact with angelic entities"? How insane is it? How profitable is
it?
One understands the mafia would call that a con trick. Or insane. But
like the Church one imagines they wouldn't care much providing it
pulls a few dollars into the coffers. Did the vampire book do better,
or worse for you?

You people are all pathetic. I wouldn't stay on this NG

But you will, because you can't do without the attention.

on a bet. But I
figure since every time I try to say goodbye you have to post more garbage
to start a fight, I'd have this last word ON your NG FROM your NG. What a
garbage can it is. So just keep your garbage in here.

Last word? Possible of course, but not very likely.

Saint

[snip rather desperately dull disparagement]


Don't worry, Therion, no one is going to fight with you. I just wanted you
to know that snipping the truth is just another stupid act on your part.

I don't think you can handle the truth, David, at least not if it'd
cost you money to do so.
--
"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."
- Attrib: Pauline Reage.
Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion?
See: <http://www.Video2CD.com>. 35.00 gets your video on DVD.
all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read.
** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.
.

User: "Doc Smartass"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 07:08:16 AM
"angelicusrex" <whisperindave@msn.com> wrote in
news:2h8e9qFa70ddU1@uni-berlin.de:

I wouldn't stay on this NG on a bet.

Yet you're still here. You're pathetic. Typical christer--total lack of
self-control, prone to whiny-***** hysterics.
You came here, peed in our sandbox, and now you're crying because we're
trying to bury you.
--
Dr. Smartass
BAAWA Knight of Heckling -- a.a. #1939
Dr. Smartass is unnaturally high in carbohydrates, fats, and sodium.
Consult your physician before consuming Dr. Smartass.
Try New "Religion Pockets!" Flaky crust with a tasty ***** center!
.

User: "JessHC"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 08:52:27 PM
"angelicusrex" <whisperindave@msn.com> wrote in message news:<2h8e9qFa70ddU1@uni-berlin.de>...
<snip>

You people are all pathetic. I wouldn't stay on this NG on a bet. But I
figure since every time I try to say goodbye you have to post more garbage
to start a fight, I'd have this last word ON your NG FROM your NG. What a
garbage can it is. So just keep your garbage in here.

That's funny, since you're the one who came prancing in here spurting
crap like a fountain. Last word, huh? That must be why you keep
posting after saying you're going to stop. Except, gee, if we
respond, you didn't get the last word. Too bad.
<snip>
.

User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 12:59:13 PM
In article <2h8e9qFa70ddU1@uni-berlin.de>, angelicusrex says...
Oh for christ's sake, SHUT UP ALREADY!
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.

User: "Liz"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 25 May 2004 06:07:51 AM
On Sat, 22 May 2004 00:37:53 -0700, "angelicusrex"
<whisperindave@msn.com> in news message <2h8e9qFa70ddU1@uni-berlin.de>
wrote:
[alt.religion.angels added because dave decided to post in alt.atheism
today despite his declaration (one of several) that he was leaving.]
[-----]

You people are all pathetic. I wouldn't stay on this NG on a bet. But I
figure since every time I try to say goodbye you have to post more garbage
to start a fight, I'd have this last word ON your NG FROM your NG. What a
garbage can it is. So just keep your garbage in here.

Atheists are not obliged to accept your garbage. You keep saying
goodbye, but you keep posting. Again and again and again.
Aren't you capable of not reading a usenet post? You are responsible
for your own actions. No one is forcing you to read or respond. Yet
you do both and blame others for your own actions. That's not very
mature of you even given the fact that you claim to be over fifty.
If you decide to read this post, see if you have the will power *not
to respond. "Take it like a man."
Liz #658 BAAWA
"Spiritually alive" apparently means that you are confusing your
internal mental constructs with actually existing things. Hans-Richard Gruemm
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 25 May 2004 07:58:22 AM
In article <tca6b09g2pv9djleoni148tr3m6fj87as5@4ax.com>, Liz says...


On Sat, 22 May 2004 00:37:53 -0700, "angelicusrex"
<whisperindave@msn.com> in news message <2h8e9qFa70ddU1@uni-berlin.de>
wrote:

[alt.religion.angels added because dave decided to post in alt.atheism
today despite his declaration (one of several) that he was leaving.]

[-----]

You people are all pathetic. I wouldn't stay on this NG on a bet. But I
figure since every time I try to say goodbye you have to post more garbage
to start a fight, I'd have this last word ON your NG FROM your NG. What a
garbage can it is. So just keep your garbage in here.


Atheists are not obliged to accept your garbage. You keep saying
goodbye, but you keep posting. Again and again and again.

Aren't you capable of not reading a usenet post? You are responsible
for your own actions. No one is forcing you to read or respond. Yet
you do both and blame others for your own actions. That's not very
mature of you even given the fact that you claim to be over fifty.

If you decide to read this post, see if you have the will power *not
to respond. "Take it like a man."

Maybe one of his angel buddies can offer him some support ;p
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.


User: "raven1"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 11:06:51 AM
On Sat, 22 May 2004 00:37:53 -0700, "angelicusrex"
<whisperindave@msn.com> wrote:
....and yet you're still here...

I said: 'Not one of you can even hold a logical thought in your head. This
e-mail to my private account proves to me that you are an illogical,
irrational creature of emotion and that you are totally unreasonable.'

The above you consider "a rather desperate rant?" Something tells me you
simply didn't want to repeat the truth. I've been reading your posts on your
NG. Irrational is not strong enough a word. You people are psychotics and
hostile towards religion in a sense I would have only thought was the case
for Nazis. One of your associates says: "Go suck your priest's *****!" I love
how he took the fact that some priests FORCE sex on young people, and then
made it a hostile attack on all Catholics! Wow. Takes some real dynamic
trauma/tension to come up with such horrible abuse. Makes this guy as bad as
any degenerate priest ever was.

In the end you guys are like the Mafia calling other people "degenerate
gamblers!" Like that' somehow worse than being a professional murderer! You
people are plain freaks. You're not atheists. Your just losers with no voice
in the real world, so you spread your insane ideas around, just like the
radical religionists do!

You people are all pathetic. I wouldn't stay on this NG on a bet. But I
figure since every time I try to say goodbye you have to post more garbage
to start a fight, I'd have this last word ON your NG FROM your NG. What a
garbage can it is. So just keep your garbage in here.

Saint

[snip rather desperately dull disparagement]


Don't worry, Therion, no one is going to fight with you. I just wanted you
to know that snipping the truth is just another stupid act on your part.



.



User: "Doc Smartass"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 07:03:55 AM
"angelicusrex" <whisperindave@msn.com> wrote in
news:2h8be7F9t2tbU1@uni-berlin.de:

I am fifty years old, Berry. And I do not have time for your play-pen
of a group.

Why are you still here? Hoping you'll get custody of the silverware and
china?
They're mine. You get the kids. I get everything else.
--
Dr. Smartass
BAAWA Knight of Heckling -- a.a. #1939
Dr. Smartass is unnaturally high in carbohydrates, fats, and sodium.
Consult your physician before consuming Dr. Smartass.
Try New "Religion Pockets!" Flaky crust with a tasty ***** center!
.

User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 12:40:37 PM
"angelicusrex" <whisperindave@msn.com> wrote in message
news:2h8be7F9t2tbU1@uni-berlin.de...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
To: <whisperindave@pubertyallover.com>
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: I just...


Great Lord "angelicusrex"


Well, you got that part right anyway!

Blithering Idiot is more like it.


<whisperindave@pubertyallover.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Fri, 21 May 2004
17:49:41 -0700 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.


So you cretins now consider YOURSELVES god's, eh?

The only cretin I see at the moment is an arrogant, self-righteous
God-botherer who posts under the name 'angelicusrex.'


You pathetic child.


I am fifty years old, Berry.

Oh? I'm surprised. From the style and content of your posts, I'd have put
you closer to 15 or 16.

And I do not have time for your play-pen of a
group.

Then do us the courtesy of staying out of it.

Not one of you can even hold a logical thought in your head.

Says the man who's never had one to hold.
See ya, Dave. Mind the screen door/***** interface on your way out....
.

User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 09:44:53 AM
Great Lord "angelicusrex" <whisperindave@msn.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Fri, 21 May 2004
23:49:03 -0700 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
To: <whisperindave@pubertyallover.com>
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: I just...


Great Lord "angelicusrex"


Well, you got that part right anyway!

<whisperindave@pubertyallover.com>, braving the raging
storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Fri, 21 May 2004
17:49:41 -0700 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.


So you cretins now consider YOURSELVES god's, eh?

No, I consider that to be my intro. I change them every few months.


You pathetic child.


I am fifty years old, Berry. And I do not have time for your play-pen of a
group. Not one of you can even hold a logical thought in your head. This
e-mail to my private account proves to me that you are an illogical,
irrational creature of emotion and that you are totally unreasonable. Your
associates asked me time and time again to leave. As soon as I do, you want
to go to private e-mail and try to hit me again? Now that IS pathetic.

You are still a child. I emailed you because, silly me, I thought you
were leaving alt.atheism. You know, unsubbing? But I see that you
were as dishonest about that as you are about everything else in your
life.
Oh, and since I sent you an email, why did you feel the need to reply
here?

Haven


The word is HAVING. Use that IQ that you think you be haven.

Ah, a spelling flame. Last refuge of the man out of ammo.

been proven an idiot time and time again,
you have to give us more evidence?


So who proved me an idiot? I am an idiot only in the annals of one, lonely
NG in a huge conglomerate of cyber discussion groups. The only thing you
have proven is how tortured you all are. All you know how to do is verbally
crucify Christians. Since you have this single minded, idiotic,
semi-autistic or psychotic obsession, what more can a person do than leave
your group to it's own devices? Go gnaw on someone else's leg. I am not a
Christian. And I don't need an NG of the Living Brain Dead.

You have proven yourself an idiot. Laughably so. Your delusions of
adequacy are stunning. For example, most people know how to leave a
group. You evidently still need someone to help your do it.

Thank you for leaving.


Your bloody welcome, now, would YOU please get off my *****, you hard-on!?

Wow. Freud would *love* that imagery! Something you'd like to tell
us? Getting lonely down there in Scottsdale?

The average IQ in the room has risen several
points.


You mean it is now at + 2 or +3 instead of -26?

Silly child! The average IQ is 100.. it doesn't measure in the
negatives! I guess they haven't covered that in school yet.. whoops,
I forgot, you claim to be an adult.

Now, if we could just get Duke to leave.


I hope Duke follows you all to your worthless graves.

Ah. For that, you get me following you to your sad, lonely death. Or
not. I have better things to do. It is interesting to see that you
went berserk over a simple email.
Child, you could have deleted my email without comment, but you have
the self-control of a four year old who wants candy.

Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail


All righty then!

Dude, no email from you in my in box.

"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."


Hmm, apparently Pascal never attended your NG!

Weren't you leaving, child?
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.

User: "*nemo*"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 04:47:15 AM
In article <2h8be7F9t2tbU1@uni-berlin.de>,
"angelicusrex" <whisperindave@msn.com> wrote:

You pathetic child.


I am fifty years old, Berry.

So? Seems to mean that you've not learned how to relate successfully to
strangers in 50 years. You're a child in the development of your social
skills. I suggest kindergarten. They teach a lot about that sort of
thing there, you know.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
User: "Therion Ware"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 04:52:24 AM
On Sat, 22 May 2004 09:47:15 GMT in alt.atheism, *nemo* (*nemo*
<nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism

In article <2h8be7F9t2tbU1@uni-berlin.de>,
"angelicusrex" <whisperindave@msn.com> wrote:

You pathetic child.


I am fifty years old, Berry.


So? Seems to mean that you've not learned how to relate successfully to
strangers in 50 years. You're a child in the development of your social
skills. I suggest kindergarten. They teach a lot about that sort of
thing there, you know.

Might be 50. See the photo and decide for yourself.
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Concourse/3658/david2.JPG
--
"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."
- Attrib: Pauline Reage.
Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion?
See: <http://www.Video2CD.com>. 35.00 gets your video on DVD.
all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read.
** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.
.


User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 01:00:32 PM
In article <2h8be7F9t2tbU1@uni-berlin.de>, angelicusrex says...
Grow up and go away already. My five-year-old is better behaved than you are.
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.

User: "Tak"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 03:23:49 AM
On Fri, 21 May 2004 23:49:03 -0700, "angelicusrex"
<whisperindave@msn.com> wrote:
Just so you know, plonking us means you don't post anymore.
get on the clue wagon.
tak
a#344
.

User: "duke"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 23 May 2004 08:23:50 AM
On Fri, 21 May 2004 23:49:03 -0700, "angelicusrex" <whisperindave@msn.com> wrote:

Now, if we could just get Duke to leave.

I hope Duke follows you all to your worthless graves.

Oh, duke will follow you all to your graves - there is no doubt about that. But not
until God tells me my time on earth is up, as he will tell you all.
The difference is that I am thinking in terms of life after life. All evidence demands
God's existence, and I hope to be included in God's team, and not the atheist's team.
No air conditioning there.
duke
*****
John 6
53Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, unless
you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his
blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats my
flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I
will raise him up at the last day.
*****
.
User: "raven1"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 23 May 2004 12:13:50 PM
On Sun, 23 May 2004 08:23:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

All evidence demands God's existence

You've yet to provide any.
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 23 May 2004 03:28:44 PM
On Sun, 23 May 2004 17:13:50 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 May 2004 08:23:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

All evidence demands God's existence


You've yet to provide any.

Actually I've provided a lot. Now, your ability to recognize reason is in real doubt.
duke
*****
John 6
53Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, unless
you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his
blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats my
flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I
will raise him up at the last day.
*****
.
User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 23 May 2004 09:50:50 PM
Great Lord duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>, braving the raging storm,
scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Sun, 23 May 2004 15:28:44
-0500 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.

Actually I've provided a lot. Now, your ability to recognize reason is in real doubt.

No, you privde claims and declarations. You'd be laughed out of
academia or a court in a second.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 24 May 2004 05:55:28 AM
On Mon, 24 May 2004 02:50:50 GMT, Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:

Great Lord duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>, braving the raging storm,
scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Sun, 23 May 2004 15:28:44
-0500 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.

Actually I've provided a lot. Now, your ability to recognize reason is in real doubt.


No, you privde claims and declarations. You'd be laughed out of
academia or a court in a second.

A court? Remember, a jury takes statements from others not necessarily eye witness and
draws a conclusion. The statement is called evidence, and is used to declare an
opinion/judgement of innocence or guilt. I have much evidence for the existence of God.
You have no evidence for God's non existence.
duke
*****
John 6
53Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, unless
you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his
blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats my
flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I
will raise him up at the last day.
*****
.
User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 24 May 2004 12:40:03 PM
Great Lord duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>, braving the raging storm,
scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Mon, 24 May 2004 05:55:28
-0500 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.

On Mon, 24 May 2004 02:50:50 GMT, Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:

Great Lord duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>, braving the raging storm,
scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Sun, 23 May 2004 15:28:44
-0500 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.

Actually I've provided a lot. Now, your ability to recognize reason is in real doubt.


No, you privde claims and declarations. You'd be laughed out of
academia or a court in a second.


A court? Remember, a jury takes statements from others not necessarily eye witness and
draws a conclusion. The statement is called evidence, and is used to declare an
opinion/judgement of innocence or guilt. I have much evidence for the existence of God.
You have no evidence for God's non existence.

Actually, before a jury hears evidence, a judge rules on it. Your
claims do not rise to the level required by law.
As for acadamia, I'd love to see you try to use your "evidence" in
front of a doctoral committee. They'd flay you alive.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.

User: "Lawrence Seib"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 24 May 2004 10:15:45 AM
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<m0l3b01ca7u7ggjc75k6eiclg5gqtqeecf@4ax.com>...

On Mon, 24 May 2004 02:50:50 GMT, Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:

Great Lord duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>, braving the raging storm,
scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Sun, 23 May 2004 15:28:44
-0500 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.

Actually I've provided a lot. Now, your ability
to recognize reason is in real doubt.


No, you privde claims and declarations.
You'd be laughed out of
academia or a court in a second.


A court? Remember, a jury takes statements
from others not necessarily eye witness and
draws a conclusion. The statement is called
evidence, and is used to declare an
opinion/judgement of innocence or guilt.
I have much evidence for the existence of God.
You have no evidence for God's non existence.

I have posted ten times as much evidence that
God does not exist as you have posted that he
does exist. Note: ten times zero equal zero.
Larry
.

User: "JessHC"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 24 May 2004 09:49:38 AM
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<m0l3b01ca7u7ggjc75k6eiclg5gqtqeecf@4ax.com>...

On Mon, 24 May 2004 02:50:50 GMT, Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:

Great Lord duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>, braving the raging storm,
scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Sun, 23 May 2004 15:28:44
-0500 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.

Actually I've provided a lot. Now, your ability to recognize reason is in real doubt.


No, you privde claims and declarations. You'd be laughed out of
academia or a court in a second.


A court? Remember, a jury takes statements from others not necessarily eye witness and
draws a conclusion. The statement is called evidence, and is used to declare an
opinion/judgement of innocence or guilt.

The statement is called "testimony." "Testimony" isn't "evidence." A
murder weapon would be evidence; photographs would be evidence.
Testimony is weighed; after all, it's a good bet one side is lying.
Maybe you think a lie is evidence equally as valid as a truth?

I have much evidence for the existence of God.

Nope. You have personal, subjective, fallible opinion. The
difference has been explained to you hundreds, if not thousands, of
times.

You have no evidence for God's non existence.

So?
.
User: "Peter van Velzen"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 24 May 2004 02:08:13 PM
(JessHC) wrote in message news:<d58e3ac.0405240649.45af74a9@posting.google.com>...

duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<m0l3b01ca7u7ggjc75k6eiclg5gqtqeecf@4ax.com>...

On Mon, 24 May 2004 02:50:50 GMT, Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:

Great Lord duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>, braving the raging storm,
scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Sun, 23 May 2004 15:28:44
-0500 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.

Actually I've provided a lot. Now, your ability to recognize reason is in real doubt.


No, you privde claims and declarations. You'd be laughed out of
academia or a court in a second.


A court? Remember, a jury takes statements from others not necessarily eye witness and
draws a conclusion. The statement is called evidence, and is used to declare an
opinion/judgement of innocence or guilt.


The statement is called "testimony." "Testimony" isn't "evidence." A
murder weapon would be evidence; photographs would be evidence.
Testimony is weighed; after all, it's a good bet one side is lying.
Maybe you think a lie is evidence equally as valid as a truth?

I have much evidence for the existence of God.


Nope. You have personal, subjective, fallible opinion. The
difference has been explained to you hundreds, if not thousands, of
times.

You have no evidence for God's non existence.


So?

By lack of evidence to the contrary, the murder mistery is no mystery at all.
God has done it!
Think for yourself
Peter van Velzen, May 2004
Atheist#1107
Amstelveen (just South of Amsterdam)
The Netherlands (Aug 5, 1950)
.


User: "Kermit"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 24 May 2004 11:14:41 AM
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<m0l3b01ca7u7ggjc75k6eiclg5gqtqeecf@4ax.com>...

On Mon, 24 May 2004 02:50:50 GMT, Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:

Great Lord duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>, braving the raging storm,
scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Sun, 23 May 2004 15:28:44
-0500 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.

Actually I've provided a lot. Now, your ability to recognize reason is in real doubt.


No, you privde claims and declarations. You'd be laughed out of
academia or a court in a second.


A court? Remember, a jury takes statements from others not necessarily eye witness and
draws a conclusion. The statement is called evidence, and is used to declare an
opinion/judgement of innocence or guilt. I have much evidence for the existence of God.
You have no evidence for God's non existence.

Nor do you have evidence for the non-existence of Wodin. If you
suggest that he was real, but a demon in disguise (a common
fundamentalist suggestion), then the question arises whether or not
you have decided on the right god. Maybe Yahweh is one of Loki's
little jokes.
Kermit:
As worried about Yahweh as I am about Osiris.



duke
*****
John 6
53Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, unless
you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his
blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats my
flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I
will raise him up at the last day.
*****

.

User: "Dixit"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 24 May 2004 03:53:57 PM
duke wrote:

On Mon, 24 May 2004 02:50:50 GMT, Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:


Great Lord duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>, braving the raging storm,
scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Sun, 23 May 2004 15:28:44
-0500 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.


Actually I've provided a lot. Now, your ability to recognize reason is in real doubt.


No, you privde claims and declarations. You'd be laughed out of
academia or a court in a second.



A court? Remember, a jury takes statements from others not necessarily eye witness and
draws a conclusion.

The correct term is 'verdict' (opinion), the opinion of the jury on the
matter submitted to it in trial.
'Conclusions' are only the result of logical arguments. The jury is not
making an argument, it is rendering an opinion on the prosecusion's
argument.

The statement is called evidence

Wrong again, the correct term is 'testimony', and the hearsay testimony
you are trying to introduce is not admisssable as evidence.
.



User: "raven1"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 23 May 2004 03:34:16 PM
On Sun, 23 May 2004 15:28:44 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Sun, 23 May 2004 17:13:50 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:

On Sun, 23 May 2004 08:23:50 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

All evidence demands God's existence


You've yet to provide any.


Actually I've provided a lot.

For example?

Now, your ability to recognize reason is in real doubt.

While your ability to BS ad infinitum is not. Now let's hear some of
this evidence you claim to have provided. Any failure to do so, or
evasion of any kind will be taken as a tacit admission that you're
unable to back up your statement.
Put up or shut up, Duke.
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 24 May 2004 05:53:02 AM
On Sun, 23 May 2004 20:34:16 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:

All evidence demands God's existence

You've yet to provide any.

Actually I've provided a lot.

For example?

Oh, you've seen it, and you can't refute it.

Now, your ability to recognize reason is in real doubt.

While your ability to BS ad infinitum is not. Now let's hear some of
this evidence you claim to have provided. Any failure to do so, or
evasion of any kind will be taken as a tacit admission that you're
unable to back up your statement.

Wow, we've just agreed you can't id evidence.

Put up or shut up, Duke.

Already put up, raven1.
duke
*****
John 6
53Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, unless
you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his
blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats my
flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I
will raise him up at the last day.
*****
.
User: "raven1"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 24 May 2004 02:55:19 PM
On Mon, 24 May 2004 05:53:02 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Sun, 23 May 2004 20:34:16 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:

All evidence demands God's existence

You've yet to provide any.

Actually I've provided a lot.

For example?


Oh, you've seen it, and you can't refute it.

No, I haven't seen it.


Now, your ability to recognize reason is in real doubt.


While your ability to BS ad infinitum is not. Now let's hear some of
this evidence you claim to have provided. Any failure to do so, or
evasion of any kind will be taken as a tacit admission that you're
unable to back up your statement.


Wow, we've just agreed you can't id evidence.

We've just demonstrated that you have no evidence to provide.


Put up or shut up, Duke.


Already put up, raven1.

Then it should be trivial for you to cite some of it. Again, your
failure to do so is an admission that you have no evidence to present,
and what's more, you know it.
.






User: "Adam Marczyk"

Title: Re: Hey, Atheists! 22 May 2004 07:35:18 PM
angelicusrex <whisperindave@msn.com> wrote in message
news:2h8be7F9t2tbU1@uni-berlin.de...
[...]

I hope Duke follows you all to your worthless graves.

You know, ordinarily I'd never cite a source of this nature, but the rules
for discussion from the Rapture Ready message board seem to sum up this
kind of behavior quite well:
"Types of Posters We'd Like To Discourage
Drama Queen: Like all message boards, there is always a constant turnover
in the number of people that frequent the RR board. Most people, after
having decided they no longer wish to visit the board, make no announcement
about their departure. Some individuals have a penchant for making long
boisterous departures from the message board that is clearly worthy of an
Emmy award - "Goodbye cruel message board" is the classic remark. Because
most of them seek to harm the morale of the board, Drama Queens are
regarded as a nuisance. What also makes them an even greater pain is their
tendency to repeatedly coming back for a series encore performances. "I
came back to see if you people changed your ways, but I see things are the
same as always - so once again, farewell cruel message board.""
(http://www.rr-bb.com/rules.php)
--
"We have loved the stars too fondly | a.a. #2001
to be fearful of the night." | http://www.ebonmusings.org
--Tombstone epitaph of | e-mail: ebonmuse!hotmail.com
two amateur astronomers, | ICQ: 8777843
quoted in Carl Sagan's _Cosmos_ | PGP Key ID: 0x5C66F737
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER