| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"duke" |
| Date: |
23 May 2006 05:23:28 PM |
| Object: |
Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
Why Are Gore and Kerry Polling Worse Than Bush?
Be pragmatic. Take a good, long look at reality, and recognize that even though
there isn't a Democrat in Washington who will admit that our political system is
profoundly sick and obsolete, in the real world, the Democratic Party is
currently all we have. So support it anyway.
That's what I've been telling myself, but boy can it be hard to swallow. Take,
for example, the sea of problems Hillary Clinton poses to any political
idealist. Hillary Clinton may represent many awful things -- Iraq, corporatism,
insane military spending -- but the truth is, millions of Americans may well
have health care if she becomes president, and they won't if she loses to a
Republican in the next election.
I know it's good when Jack Abramoff sinks six congressmen and a senator; I know
it's good when Bush's ratings hover in the 30s. I choke down my speeches about
how both of these things are symptomatic of systemic problems and not due to the
virtue of elected Democrats. And I am intrigued and hopeful at the prospect of
Al Gore running for president, even though I think it's bizarre to engage in the
dominant political language surrounding presidential contests -- where the every
little move of one human being is treated as representative of the political
desires of 300 million. Still, that's all there is. So I'm going with it.
This kind of "pragmatism" isn't any easier when the wider public thinks there's
something deeply wrong as well. They clearly aren't buying "John Kerry" or "Al
Gore" at this point. A recent New York Times poll has both of them ranking below
the worst president in history. Kerry is at 26 percent, and former vice
president and presidential candidate Gore is at 28 percent. George W. Bush is
pulling in at 31 percent.
There are a lot of numbers in the recent poll that would normally give me cause
for joy -- the public hates everything about Bush. Only 13 percent think he's
done a good job addressing rising gas prices. Twenty-nine percent are still
favorably shocked and awed by his performance on Iraq. The surface-level
political analysis making the progressive rounds on Bush's bad poll numbers is
that they will automatically translate into success for Democrats: takeovers in
Congress in 2006, etc.
But if that were the case, it would be fair to expect that a guy like Al Gore
would look like the shiniest red apple in the basket. But to repeat, the same
poll has Gore polling below George Bush. The Times called Gore one of "Bush's
more vocal critics." What does that mean? Let's be pragmatic.
For starters, it means that Al Gore and John Kerry are big losers in the public
eye; they weren't the guys at the inauguration. Even though the results of the
2000 and 2004 elections have been contested and remain in dispute, the truth is
that neither Gore nor Kerry ever commanded any kind of massive public support
for their positions.
If they had, Kerry wouldn't be still grumbling about those 60,000 votes that he
needed in Ohio. But this poll that has Gore and Kerry well below Bush is about
more than their being losers. If that were true, we might expect to see an
untested national-name Democrat, like say, Hillary Clinton, polling at a higher
level -- at least in the 40s. But only 31 percent of Americans say they will
definitely vote for her, according to the most recent Rassmussen poll.
These bipartisan absurdly low numbers for our national politicians mean to me
that there's something more profound going on in American society than our
national politicians are willing to fess up to. I think it's something very
close to what writer Matt Taibbi once explained about why he wanted to pack the
10 Democrats vying for the Democratic nomination in the 2004 election "into a
missile and shoot them into space":
Here we are, in a world that is completely and utterly insane -- where giant
fast-food companies spend fortunes researching the responses of three- and
four-year-olds in order to exploit them, where billions of dollars are pissed
away every day on shitty movies like "Finding Nemo" while schools are going down
to the four-day week, and where the average New Yorker sees three or four
thousand ads a day, most of which tell him he's fat and impotent, and a Nissan
is a better buy than his wife -- and these candidates are up there tinkering,
talking about a balanced budget and repealing tax cuts. There isn't a
[candidate] among them who even hints at anything like horror before our
fatuous, commercial lives.
The Democrats … don't want to be anything other than better caretakers for that
museum of human history. They don't try to imagine a fundamentally better world,
because they actually believe that there isn't one. They're buffoons straight
out of Voltaire, running on a platform of "Our mild improvements to this best of
all possible worlds."
The bigger point is that it seems like the political language that will put a
president or presidential candidate way above the magic 50 percent has to
channel something deeper than the tinkering BS you hear out of Mark Warner or
Bill Frist's mouth. Even the queen of political pangloss, former Reagan
speechwriter Peggy Noonan, has been willing to admit to a more fundamental
sickness in our politics. In an essay she penned last October, she conceded the
sense that "we're at the end of something":
I think there is an unspoken subtext in our national political culture right now
… a sense that the wheels are coming off the trolley and the trolley off the
tracks. … It's beyond, 'The president is overwhelmed.' The presidency is
overwhelmed.
In my case, I'd like to see just one establishment politician in Washington to
come out of the closet and say it: that our political system hasn't changed
since the 18th century; that the lower house of Congress has 435 people
"representing" 300 million citizens, in some cases thousands of miles away from
their constituents; that the Constitution is outdated, obsolete, virtually
unmodified -- but that's just what I want to hear.
All this said, I still want to be pragmatic. And remember, I expect to remain a
Democratic Party cheerleader. I know it will be good if there's a Democratic
House majority decided on the eve of this Nov. 2, even if it's clear they don't
have the capacity to do more than whisper in the graveyard. Because even a
President Hillary Clinton still could mean health care -- for millions
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
23 May 2006 05:45:40 PM |
|
|
In article <bj27725kuajqqh88udioqdtjt2ffuamio6@4ax.com> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:
So, where did you plagiarize this particular item from, Duke?
No matter: it's pretty sad when your only brag is that your boy, although
approved of by less than one in three Americans, is a handful of percentage
points better off than a couple of his fellow has-beens.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
24 May 2006 05:32:17 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 23 May 2006 22:45:40 +0000 (UTC), (Cary
Kittrell) wrote:
So, where did you plagiarize this particular item from, Duke?
From the news.
No matter: it's pretty sad when your only brag is that your boy, although
approved of by less than one in three Americans, is a handful of percentage
points better off than a couple of his fellow has-beens.
They're not in charge and they are still hated.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
24 May 2006 05:53:39 PM |
|
|
In article <5mn972pppoi7kgkkm8a2808i49jih11qr1@4ax.com> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:
On Tue, 23 May 2006 22:45:40 +0000 (UTC), (Cary
Kittrell) wrote:
So, where did you plagiarize this particular item from, Duke?
From the news.
It's traditional to give credit when you rip off someone else's work.
No matter: it's pretty sad when your only brag is that your boy, although
approved of by less than one in three Americans, is a handful of percentage
points better off than a couple of his fellow has-beens.
They're not in charge and they are still hated.
They're not in charge, so a large fraction of the people
surveyed had no opinion, one way or the other (34% for Kerry,
33% for Gore)
Only Duke could see it as a Good Thing when a poll finds
Bush with an approval rating five points below Hillary's.
On the other hand, Bush WAS beloved when compared to
***** "Hawkeye" Cheney, who garnered a heart-warming 20%.
(all figures from <http://nytimes.com/ref/us/polls_index.html>. *I*
give my sources)
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
26 May 2006 05:05:34 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 24 May 2006 22:53:39 +0000 (UTC), (Cary
Kittrell) wrote:
So, where did you plagiarize this particular item from, Duke?
From the news.
It's traditional to give credit when you rip off someone else's work.
I'm not ripping of anyone else's work. You're totally confused over the concept
of plagiarism.
No matter: it's pretty sad when your only brag is that your boy, although
approved of by less than one in three Americans, is a handful of percentage
points better off than a couple of his fellow has-beens.
They're not in charge and they are still hated.
They're not in charge, so a large fraction of the people
surveyed had no opinion, one way or the other (34% for Kerry,
33% for Gore)
They're not in charge but they occupy a prominent public exposure.
President Bush is higher rated that either of these two clowns.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
23 May 2006 07:09:53 PM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, Cary Kittrell in episode
<e503ak$ocm$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu>...
So, where did you plagiarize this particular item from, Duke?
http://www.alternet.org/story/36425/
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
23 May 2006 09:02:37 PM |
|
|
In article <Mu6dnfkEs7HMOe7ZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net> "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> writes:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Cary Kittrell in episode
<e503ak$ocm$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu>...
So, where did you plagiarize this particular item from, Duke?
http://www.alternet.org/story/36425/
Oh, I know: I just wanted to see Duke attribute one of his
sources for a change.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
24 May 2006 05:36:12 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 24 May 2006 02:02:37 +0000 (UTC), (Cary
Kittrell) wrote:
In article <Mu6dnfkEs7HMOe7ZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net> "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> writes:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Cary Kittrell in episode
<e503ak$ocm$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu>...
So, where did you plagiarize this particular item from, Duke?
http://www.alternet.org/story/36425/
Oh, I know: I just wanted to see Duke attribute one of his
sources for a change.
When it's from the tv or radio news, or a newspaper, I leave it at that. If you
don't read/see these, that's your problem, not mine.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
24 May 2006 06:02:32 PM |
|
|
In article <aon972t7jl3r62acj9eoeus7scb1ujmh13@4ax.com> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 02:02:37 +0000 (UTC), (Cary
Kittrell) wrote:
In article <Mu6dnfkEs7HMOe7ZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net> "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> writes:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Cary Kittrell in episode
<e503ak$ocm$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu>...
So, where did you plagiarize this particular item from, Duke?
http://www.alternet.org/story/36425/
Oh, I know: I just wanted to see Duke attribute one of his
sources for a change.
When it's from the tv or radio news, or a newspaper, I leave it at that. If you
don't read/see these, that's your problem, not mine.
No, your ripping of of the work of others without giving credit
is most definitely not my problem.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
26 May 2006 05:01:44 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 24 May 2006 23:02:32 +0000 (UTC), (Cary
Kittrell) wrote:
In article <aon972t7jl3r62acj9eoeus7scb1ujmh13@4ax.com> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 02:02:37 +0000 (UTC), (Cary
Kittrell) wrote:
In article <Mu6dnfkEs7HMOe7ZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@megapath.net> "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> writes:
Previously, on alt.atheism, Cary Kittrell in episode
<e503ak$ocm$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu>...
So, where did you plagiarize this particular item from, Duke?
http://www.alternet.org/story/36425/
Oh, I know: I just wanted to see Duke attribute one of his
sources for a change.
When it's from the tv or radio news, or a newspaper, I leave it at that. If you
don't read/see these, that's your problem, not mine.
No, your ripping of of the work of others without giving credit
is most definitely not my problem.
-- cary
Why, no, not at all. You see, I'm not taking personal credit for these
revelations. I'm reporting what the consensus is. In the case of bud the dud,
she's scared to death of plagiarism.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gulo Gulo" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
23 May 2006 08:45:45 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
Why Are Gore and Kerry Polling Worse Than Bush?
Duh ... the answer should be glaringly obvious to anyone with a clue -
which naturally excludes the poster. It probably doesn't exclude the
person who wrote the article that the poster - completely unable to
produce such a coherent, if misguided missive - plagiarized.
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/politics/20060509_POLL_RESULTS.pdf
A look at the poll itself (not the fluff article accompaning it, nor
the silly spin that Duke eats up because it gives him a warm fuzzy)
indeed reveals that Bush's approval stands at 31%, Kerry's at 26% and
Gore at 28%, per the New York Times. Of course, what is beyond Duke
(and what the writer conveniently ignored) is that Bush is the
President. Damn near everyone has an opinion about him. In fact, the
poll reveals that only 6% have no opinion on Bush - his approval stands
at 31%, his disapproval at 63%.
For Kerry, his approval is at 26% and his disapproval at 38%. A full
36% of the populace have no opinion about him. Of those with an
opinion, he commands approval from a greater share than does Bush.
Ditto for Gore, at 28%/39% approval/disapproval. Again, a full third
of those oolled have no opinion of him. Big shocker then that from
this much smaller pool, his approval numbers lag behind Bush. But
again, of those with an opinion, he garners a larger percentage of
approvers than does Bush.
While Kerry and Gore barely trail Bush in approval, Bush absolutely
blows them away in disapproval:
Bush - 63%
Kerry - 38%
Gore - 39%
Heaven forbid that the writer give that side of the story. I give Duke
a pass on failing to do so - I'm sure Duke is too stupid to ever look
at an actual poll, as opposed to simply taking the distilled media
version of it, so he undoubted remains blissfully ignorant of these
facts.
Of course, the real comparison would be a hypothetical Kerry/Gore v.
George W. Bush matchup. No ones polling on that, naturally, since Bush
can't run again. ut how about if we let ***** Cheney or Jeb Bush stand
in for George W. Bush? After all, Cheney is an integral part of the
Administration, a reflection of Bush (or vice versa), while Jeb Bush is
the President's more popular younger brother.
Well, surprise, surprise! Gore kicks the snot out of both Cheney and
Jeb Bush in a hypothetical 2008 matchup! Both matchups per Fox News.
Is there any doubt he would do so to George W. Bush as well?
http://pollingreport.com/2008.htm
Now, the writer also snivels and whines about *only* 31% of Americans
will *definitely* vote for Hillary Clinton in 2008, if she is the
nominee. Again, looking at the link above, Fox News shows Hillary
Clinton with a 35% "definitely will vote for" mark ... and that on this
count she is polling *ahead* of both Rudy Giuliani (33% will definitely
vote for) and John McCain (30% will definitely vote for).
Well, so much for the old "Bush is more popular than Gore and Kerry,
and everyone hates Hillary!" meme.
Nice cut-and-paste job though, Duke. You sure have mastered that
skill. Did you take a class or something?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
24 May 2006 02:57:52 AM |
|
|
"Gulo Gulo" <gulo.gulo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148435145.371881.109090@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
duke wrote:
Why Are Gore and Kerry Polling Worse Than Bush?
Duh ... the answer should be glaringly obvious to anyone with a clue -
which naturally excludes the poster. It probably doesn't exclude the
person who wrote the article that the poster - completely unable to
produce such a coherent, if misguided missive - plagiarized.
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/politics/20060509_POLL_RESULTS.pdf
A look at the poll itself (not the fluff article accompaning it, nor
the silly spin that Duke eats up because it gives him a warm fuzzy)
indeed reveals that Bush's approval stands at 31%, Kerry's at 26% and
Gore at 28%, per the New York Times. Of course, what is beyond Duke
(and what the writer conveniently ignored) is that Bush is the
President. Damn near everyone has an opinion about him. In fact, the
poll reveals that only 6% have no opinion on Bush - his approval stands
at 31%, his disapproval at 63%.
For Kerry, his approval is at 26% and his disapproval at 38%. A full
36% of the populace have no opinion about him. Of those with an
opinion, he commands approval from a greater share than does Bush.
Ditto for Gore, at 28%/39% approval/disapproval. Again, a full third
of those oolled have no opinion of him. Big shocker then that from
this much smaller pool, his approval numbers lag behind Bush. But
again, of those with an opinion, he garners a larger percentage of
approvers than does Bush.
While Kerry and Gore barely trail Bush in approval, Bush absolutely
blows them away in disapproval:
Bush - 63%
Kerry - 38%
Gore - 39%
Heaven forbid that the writer give that side of the story. I give Duke
a pass on failing to do so - I'm sure Duke is too stupid to ever look
at an actual poll, as opposed to simply taking the distilled media
version of it, so he undoubted remains blissfully ignorant of these
facts.
Of course, the real comparison would be a hypothetical Kerry/Gore v.
George W. Bush matchup. No ones polling on that, naturally, since Bush
can't run again. ut how about if we let ***** Cheney or Jeb Bush stand
in for George W. Bush? After all, Cheney is an integral part of the
Administration, a reflection of Bush (or vice versa), while Jeb Bush is
the President's more popular younger brother.
Well, surprise, surprise! Gore kicks the snot out of both Cheney and
Jeb Bush in a hypothetical 2008 matchup! Both matchups per Fox News.
Is there any doubt he would do so to George W. Bush as well?
http://pollingreport.com/2008.htm
Now, the writer also snivels and whines about *only* 31% of Americans
will *definitely* vote for Hillary Clinton in 2008, if she is the
nominee. Again, looking at the link above, Fox News shows Hillary
Clinton with a 35% "definitely will vote for" mark ... and that on this
count she is polling *ahead* of both Rudy Giuliani (33% will definitely
vote for) and John McCain (30% will definitely vote for).
Well, so much for the old "Bush is more popular than Gore and Kerry,
and everyone hates Hillary!" meme.
Nice cut-and-paste job though, Duke. You sure have mastered that
skill. Did you take a class or something?
Will you have my baby?
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
24 May 2006 05:39:41 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 24 May 2006 02:57:52 -0500, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote:
"Gulo Gulo" <gulo.gulo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148435145.371881.109090@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
duke wrote:
Why Are Gore and Kerry Polling Worse Than Bush?
Duh ... the answer should be glaringly obvious to anyone with a clue -
which naturally excludes the poster. It probably doesn't exclude the
person who wrote the article that the poster - completely unable to
produce such a coherent, if misguided missive - plagiarized.
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/politics/20060509_POLL_RESULTS.pdf
A look at the poll itself (not the fluff article accompaning it, nor
the silly spin that Duke eats up because it gives him a warm fuzzy)
indeed reveals that Bush's approval stands at 31%, Kerry's at 26% and
Gore at 28%, per the New York Times. Of course, what is beyond Duke
(and what the writer conveniently ignored) is that Bush is the
President. Damn near everyone has an opinion about him. In fact, the
poll reveals that only 6% have no opinion on Bush - his approval stands
at 31%, his disapproval at 63%.
For Kerry, his approval is at 26% and his disapproval at 38%. A full
36% of the populace have no opinion about him. Of those with an
opinion, he commands approval from a greater share than does Bush.
Ditto for Gore, at 28%/39% approval/disapproval. Again, a full third
of those oolled have no opinion of him. Big shocker then that from
this much smaller pool, his approval numbers lag behind Bush. But
again, of those with an opinion, he garners a larger percentage of
approvers than does Bush.
While Kerry and Gore barely trail Bush in approval, Bush absolutely
blows them away in disapproval:
Bush - 63%
Kerry - 38%
Gore - 39%
Heaven forbid that the writer give that side of the story. I give Duke
a pass on failing to do so - I'm sure Duke is too stupid to ever look
at an actual poll, as opposed to simply taking the distilled media
version of it, so he undoubted remains blissfully ignorant of these
facts.
Of course, the real comparison would be a hypothetical Kerry/Gore v.
George W. Bush matchup. No ones polling on that, naturally, since Bush
can't run again. ut how about if we let ***** Cheney or Jeb Bush stand
in for George W. Bush? After all, Cheney is an integral part of the
Administration, a reflection of Bush (or vice versa), while Jeb Bush is
the President's more popular younger brother.
Well, surprise, surprise! Gore kicks the snot out of both Cheney and
Jeb Bush in a hypothetical 2008 matchup! Both matchups per Fox News.
Is there any doubt he would do so to George W. Bush as well?
http://pollingreport.com/2008.htm
Now, the writer also snivels and whines about *only* 31% of Americans
will *definitely* vote for Hillary Clinton in 2008, if she is the
nominee. Again, looking at the link above, Fox News shows Hillary
Clinton with a 35% "definitely will vote for" mark ... and that on this
count she is polling *ahead* of both Rudy Giuliani (33% will definitely
vote for) and John McCain (30% will definitely vote for).
Well, so much for the old "Bush is more popular than Gore and Kerry,
and everyone hates Hillary!" meme.
Nice cut-and-paste job though, Duke. You sure have mastered that
skill. Did you take a class or something?
Will you have my baby?
Gulo Gulo said he wants you to have his baby, little queer person.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gulo Gulo" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
24 May 2006 10:38:42 PM |
|
|
Gulo Gulo said he wants you to have his baby, little queer person.
Right from the mouth of the laughable fool whose pinnacle of
achievement is cutting-and-pasting the spin of an article summarizing a
poll.
Poor Duke ... too fucking inept and stupid to even begin to respond to
a single point I made. The sum total of his 'rebuttal' is "You're
gay!".
My 7-year-old could outwit the assclown ...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
25 May 2006 08:29:04 PM |
|
|
"Gulo Gulo" <gulo.gulo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148528322.197597.273460@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Gulo Gulo said he wants you to have his baby, little queer person.
Right from the mouth of the laughable fool whose pinnacle of
achievement is cutting-and-pasting the spin of an article summarizing a
poll.
Poor Duke ... too fucking inept and stupid to even begin to respond to
a single point I made. The sum total of his 'rebuttal' is "You're
gay!".
Especially since my fantasy is that you're a tall redhead with big knockers
and a tight *****, (Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong...) and apparently
Duke's fantasy is two guys having sex. To each their own, I guess.
My 7-year-old could outwit the assclown ...
You ought to have him as a guest flamer sometime!
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
26 May 2006 01:50:29 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 25 May 2006 20:29:04 -0500, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote:
"Gulo Gulo" <gulo.gulo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148528322.197597.273460@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Gulo Gulo said he wants you to have his baby, little queer person.
Right from the mouth of the laughable fool whose pinnacle of
achievement is cutting-and-pasting the spin of an article summarizing a
poll.
Poor Duke ... too fucking inept and stupid to even begin to respond to
a single point I made. The sum total of his 'rebuttal' is "You're
gay!".
Especially since my fantasy is that you're a tall redhead with big knockers
and a tight *****, (Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong...) and apparently
Duke's fantasy is two guys having sex. To each their own, I guess.
Nope, not even you and yang getting it on would get my attention.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
26 May 2006 03:28:02 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:meje72hcps7q365vopn10husoqhvj6kn0t@4ax.com...
On Thu, 25 May 2006 20:29:04 -0500, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote:
"Gulo Gulo" <gulo.gulo@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148528322.197597.273460@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Gulo Gulo said he wants you to have his baby, little queer person.
Right from the mouth of the laughable fool whose pinnacle of
achievement is cutting-and-pasting the spin of an article summarizing a
poll.
Poor Duke ... too fucking inept and stupid to even begin to respond to
a single point I made. The sum total of his 'rebuttal' is "You're
gay!".
Especially since my fantasy is that you're a tall redhead with big
knockers
and a tight *****, (Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong...) and apparently
Duke's fantasy is two guys having sex. To each their own, I guess.
Nope, not even you and yang getting it on would get my attention.
Your posts say no no, but your obsessions say yes yes.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
24 May 2006 10:52:10 PM |
|
|
On 24 May 2006 20:38:42 -0700, "Gulo Gulo" <gulo.gulo@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Gulo Gulo said he wants you to have his baby, little queer person.
Right from the mouth of the laughable fool whose pinnacle of
achievement is cutting-and-pasting the spin of an article summarizing a
poll.
Poor Duke ... too fucking inept and stupid to even begin to respond to
a single point I made. The sum total of his 'rebuttal' is "You're
gay!".
My 7-year-old could outwit the assclown ...
That's why your 7 YO would beat up duke's 7...
Oops, that's right, loser Earl Weber is a biological failure. He has
no kids.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2458 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Ahhhhhh, yessssssss, ummmmmmm - Alito, Alito, Alito"
-duke (duckgumbo@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 59
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge,who pussied
out of the Vietnam draft, showing his gay side
despite his avowed anti-gay bigotry
Contact duke's priest and ask
him why duke is such a racist:
http://www.stpatrickbr.org/
Father Gerard "Jerry" Martin
stpatrickbr<AT>bellsouth<DOT>net
Saint Patrick Catholic Church
12424 Brogdon Lane
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "SpankyTClown" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, numbnuts yang, botox 26%, gore 28%, Bush2 31% |
26 May 2006 08:58:19 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 02:57:52 -0500, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote:
Gulo Gulo said he wants you to have his baby, little queer person.
That's well said from some spunk gobbling choir boy like yourself.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
