| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Johnny P" |
| Date: |
07 Jun 2006 05:02:47 PM |
| Object: |
Hey there |
So what is up these days in alt.atheism???
Is there still no God in here? Jesus sends his best. Wishes you all
would have a little faith. :)
Seriously.
Have a nice day
Johnny P
.
|
|
| User: "GODS CREATOR" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
09 Jun 2006 02:05:41 AM |
|
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font color="#333399"><big><big><b>Johnny P wrote:</b></big></big></font>
<blockquote cite="midiLKdnYCeJquc0BrZnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@adelphia.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><font color="#330099"><b>So what is up these days in <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:alt.atheism">news:alt.atheism</a> ???
Is there still no God in here? Jesus sends his best. Wishes you all
would have a little faith. :)
Seriously.
Have a nice day
Johnny P
</b></font>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<div align="center"> <font color="#993399"><big><big><big><b>Thus
Spake: God's Creator!</b></big></big></big><br>
</font></div>
<br>
<br>
<big><b>Don't your God ever tell you ANYTHING! ??<br>
<br>
And the next time you talk to Jeezzus, please... give him this message.</b></big>
<span class="moz-smiley-s4"><span> :-P </span></span><br>
<br>
<big><big><b><br>
</b><font color="#993399"><b>God's Creator!</b></font></big></big><br>
(<font color="#cc0000"><big><b>That was my only sin...</b></big></font>)<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="77">-- <b></b>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<font color="#330033"><b><big> Psstt.... Hey! ---> <font
color="#990000">USED GODS SALE! : ---> </font> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.godchecker.com/">http://www.godchecker.com/</a> </big></b></font>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
</pre>
</body>
</html>
.
|
|
|
| User: "GODS CREATOR" |
|
| Title: I am a tit |
09 Jun 2006 03:12:35 PM |
|
|
GOD'S CREATOR schreef:
*Johnny P wrote:*
*So what is up these days in news:alt.atheism ???
Is there still no God in here? Jesus sends his best. Wishes you all
would have a little faith. :)
Seriously.
Have a nice day
Johnny P
*
*Thus Spake: God's Creator!*
*Don't your God ever tell you ANYTHING! ??
And the next time you talk to Jeezzus, please... give him this message.* :-P
*
**God's Creator!*
(*That was my only sin...*)
-- **
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* Psstt.... Hey! ---> USED GODS SALE! : ---> http://www.godchecker.com/ *
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
| User: "*G* *O* *D* *S* *C* *R* *E* *A* *T* *O* *R*" |
|
| Title: Re: I am a tit |
09 Jun 2006 06:46:45 PM |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030909040403060905060903
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
The Real GOD'S CREATOR! wrote:
To: The ***** eater <the14thdisciple@littleboxes.nl>
( You are still stupid!)
--
The Real God's Creator!
(That was my only sin...)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Psstt.... Hey! ---> USED GODS SALE! : ---> http://www.godchecker.com/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--------------030909040403060905060903
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<div align="center"><font color="#993399"><small><b><big><big>The Real
GOD'S CREATOR! wrote:</big></big></b></small></font><br>
</div>
<br>
<div align="center"><big><big><b>To:</b></big></big> <big><b>The *****
eater <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:the14thdisciple@littleboxes.nl"><the14thdisciple@littleboxes.nl></a> </b></big><br>
( <big><b>You are still stupid!)<br>
<br>
</b></big></div>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="77">--
<font color="#993399"><big><b>The Real God's Creator!</b></big></font>
(<b><font color="#cc0000">That was my only sin...</font></b>)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<big><b> <font color="#330033">Psstt.... Hey! ---> <font
color="#cc0000">USED GODS SALE! : ---> </font><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.godchecker.com/">http://www.godchecker.com/</a> </font></b></big>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
</pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------030909040403060905060903--
.
|
|
|
| User: "the14thdisciple" |
|
| Title: Re: I am a tit |
09 Jun 2006 07:33:24 PM |
|
|
The Real GOD'S CREATOR! wrote:
To: The ***** eater <the14thdisciple@littleboxes.nl>
( You are still stupid!)
that's Perfetley wright, miss, and i Am also verey good at identifying
peapel what hafe got a monkey or hafe had one recentley. i Am afraid
you do NOT fall into neither of thoase cattergories.
but ! do NOT worry, i know of a bloake who can get you a monkey Fresh
from india whear they grow them but he chargeths LOTs of money four
them hugh mite NOT be abel two afford juan but i Think he mite be abel
to throw in a bit of ivory or somthing two make it worth yoar while?
of Corrs you are perfetley within yoar tights two go and purchase a
monkey elsewhear but i Can NOT garrantee good monkeydom will be
obtained from simions supplied by another monkey supplier.
police Let me know then? oK
loaf Form yoar Old freand 14
http://www.littleboxes.nl/the14thdisciple
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chris H. Fleming" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
07 Jun 2006 05:19:27 PM |
|
|
Johnny P wrote:
So what is up these days in alt.atheism???
Is there still no God in here? Jesus sends his best. Wishes you all
would have a little faith. :)
Seriously.
Have a nice day
Johnny P
If Jesus wants us to have faith, then he can come and talk to us in
person.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
07 Jun 2006 06:47:31 PM |
|
|
"Chris H. Fleming" <chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1149718766.987151.233780@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny P wrote:
So what is up these days in alt.atheism???
Is there still no God in here? Jesus sends his best. Wishes you all
would have a little faith. :)
Seriously.
Have a nice day
Johnny P
If Jesus wants us to have faith, then he can come and talk to us in
person.
Indeed, if this god character is as omniscient as it's claimed it is it
knows where to find me.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
08 Jun 2006 08:27:35 AM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, Denis Loubet in episode
<M9OdneBK1Jkl-BrZnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@io.com>...
"Chris H. Fleming" <chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1149718766.987151.233780@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny P wrote:
So what is up these days in alt.atheism???
Is there still no God in here? Jesus sends his best. Wishes you
all
would have a little faith. :)
Seriously.
Have a nice day
Johnny P
If Jesus wants us to have faith, then he can come and talk to us in
person.
Indeed, if this god character is as omniscient as it's claimed it is it
knows where to find me.
I've said for a while now that god, being "omniscient," "omnipotent," and
"omnipresent," knows exactly what it would take to convince each and every
human being of his existence. Otherwise, he's not "god."
And none of this "free will" excuse either. If he's a real *god, he knows
how to do it so that everybody would *freely choose to believe...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
08 Jun 2006 03:50:32 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:Z76dndNz5dRauBXZnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Denis Loubet in episode
<M9OdneBK1Jkl-BrZnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@io.com>...
"Chris H. Fleming" <chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1149718766.987151.233780@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny P wrote:
So what is up these days in alt.atheism???
Is there still no God in here? Jesus sends his best. Wishes you
all
would have a little faith. :)
Seriously.
Have a nice day
Johnny P
If Jesus wants us to have faith, then he can come and talk to us in
person.
Indeed, if this god character is as omniscient as it's claimed it is it
knows where to find me.
I've said for a while now that god, being "omniscient," "omnipotent," and
"omnipresent," knows exactly what it would take to convince each and every
human being of his existence. Otherwise, he's not "god."
And none of this "free will" excuse either. If he's a real *god, he knows
how to do it so that everybody would *freely choose to believe...
And hey, if accepting solid evidence and logical argument from a god
constitutes a violation of our free will, then what the hell are all these
Christians doing here trying to convince us of the existence of god with
claims of solid evidence and "logical" argument?
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
09 Jun 2006 01:48:10 AM |
|
|
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:Z76dndNz5dRauBXZnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Denis Loubet in episode
<M9OdneBK1Jkl-BrZnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@io.com>...
"Chris H. Fleming" <chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1149718766.987151.233780@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny P wrote:
So what is up these days in alt.atheism???
Is there still no God in here? Jesus sends his best. Wishes you
all
would have a little faith. :)
Seriously.
Have a nice day
Johnny P
If Jesus wants us to have faith, then he can come and talk to us in
person.
Indeed, if this god character is as omniscient as it's claimed it is it
knows where to find me.
I've said for a while now that god, being "omniscient," "omnipotent," and
"omnipresent," knows exactly what it would take to convince each and
every human being of his existence. Otherwise, he's not "god."
And none of this "free will" excuse either. If he's a real *god, he knows
how to do it so that everybody would *freely choose to believe...
And hey, if accepting solid evidence and logical argument from a god
constitutes a violation of our free will, then what the hell are all these
Christians doing here trying to convince us of the existence of god with
claims of solid evidence and "logical" argument?
For that matter, why do they wave that damned bible at us?
--
"Its the hit dog what yelps."
- Mark Twain
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kurt Nicklas" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
09 Jun 2006 05:53:22 PM |
|
|
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:Z76dndNz5dRauBXZnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Denis Loubet in episode
<M9OdneBK1Jkl-BrZnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@io.com>...
"Chris H. Fleming" <chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1149718766.987151.233780@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny P wrote:
So what is up these days in alt.atheism???
Is there still no God in here? Jesus sends his best. Wishes you
all
would have a little faith. :)
Seriously.
Have a nice day
Johnny P
If Jesus wants us to have faith, then he can come and talk to us in
person.
Indeed, if this god character is as omniscient as it's claimed it is it
knows where to find me.
I've said for a while now that god, being "omniscient," "omnipotent," and
"omnipresent," knows exactly what it would take to convince each and every
human being of his existence. Otherwise, he's not "god."
And none of this "free will" excuse either. If he's a real *god, he knows
how to do it so that everybody would *freely choose to believe...
And hey, if accepting solid evidence and logical argument from a god
constitutes a violation of our free will, then what the hell are all these
Christians doing here trying to convince us of the existence of god with
claims of solid evidence and "logical" argument?
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for anti-theists to be
making
the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
10 Jun 2006 04:31:27 AM |
|
|
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:Z76dndNz5dRauBXZnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@megapath.net...
Previously, on alt.atheism, Denis Loubet in episode
<M9OdneBK1Jkl-BrZnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@io.com>...
"Chris H. Fleming" <chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1149718766.987151.233780@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Johnny P wrote:
So what is up these days in alt.atheism???
Is there still no God in here? Jesus sends his best. Wishes you
all
would have a little faith. :)
Seriously.
Have a nice day
Johnny P
If Jesus wants us to have faith, then he can come and talk to us in
person.
Indeed, if this god character is as omniscient as it's claimed it is
it
knows where to find me.
I've said for a while now that god, being "omniscient," "omnipotent,"
and
"omnipresent," knows exactly what it would take to convince each and
every
human being of his existence. Otherwise, he's not "god."
And none of this "free will" excuse either. If he's a real *god, he
knows
how to do it so that everybody would *freely choose to believe...
And hey, if accepting solid evidence and logical argument from a god
constitutes a violation of our free will, then what the hell are all
these
Christians doing here trying to convince us of the existence of god with
claims of solid evidence and "logical" argument?
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for anti-theists to be
making
the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put scare quotes
around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
10 Jun 2006 06:56:15 AM |
|
|
Denis Loubet wrote:
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for anti-theists to be
making
the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put scare quotes
around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
Again, go to the best texts of the best university philosophy
and divinity schools, look for evidence for god.
The best don't have anything. If it isn't there it isn't.
What can you say?
This is not illogica,l it is the way it is because there is
nothing for these books to report in way of evidence.
If I am wrong, all Kurtie has to do is order the best text books and
show us that evidence. If there is none in the best textbooks, he
needs to explain why.
Why do the theists who post here never go to the best text
books, find that proof and show us that proof?
I think spelling this out to Kurtie is useless.
he is like Gandy, Fool, Duke, Dore, not
a thinking person at all.
--
"Its the hit dog what yelps."
- Mark Twain
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kurt Nicklas" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
10 Jun 2006 10:04:37 AM |
|
|
wbarwell wrote:
Denis Loubet wrote:
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for anti-theists to be
making
the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put scare quotes
around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
Again, go to the best texts of the best university philosophy
and divinity schools, look for evidence for god.
The best don't have anything. If it isn't there it isn't.
What can you say?
This is not illogica,l it is the way it is because there is
nothing for these books to report in way of evidence.
If I am wrong, all Kurtie has to do is order the best text books and
show us that evidence.
The Greek work 'meta', Billy.
Does it mean 'before' or 'after'.
Admit you don't know.
Make us laugh at you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kurt Nicklas" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
10 Jun 2006 05:33:46 AM |
|
|
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for anti-theists to be
making
the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put scare quotes
around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know there "is
no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
10 Jun 2006 03:21:17 PM |
|
|
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for anti-theists to be
making
the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put scare quotes
around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know there "is
no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god character the
Christians pray to, it's described as omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't there, then I'm
done.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kurt Nicklas" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
10 Jun 2006 05:37:29 PM |
|
|
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for anti-theists to be
making
the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put scare quotes
around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know there "is
no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god character the
Christians pray to, it's described as omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't there, then I'm
done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be omnipresent,
if you look
into, say, the corner of your living room and you don't see God then
that means God does not exist.
Is that what you're saying?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
10 Jun 2006 05:25:39 PM |
|
|
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for anti-theists
to be making the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put scare
quotes around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know there
"is no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god character
the Christians pray to, it's described as omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't there, then
I'm done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be omnipresent,
if you look into, say, the corner of your living room and you don't
see God then that means God does not exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Unless you're planning to redefine "omnipresent" now too.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
How would you like your toast, sir?
Zarqawi style, please!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kurt Nicklas" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
10 Jun 2006 08:49:36 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for anti-theists
to be making the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put scare
quotes around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know there
"is no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god character
the Christians pray to, it's described as omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't there, then
I'm done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be omnipresent,
if you look into, say, the corner of your living room and you don't
see God then that means God does not exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Unless you're planning to redefine "omnipresent" now too.
Would you like to define it, Fred?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
11 Jun 2006 05:31:24 AM |
|
|
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149990576.074486.238070@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for
anti-theists to be making the illogical claim that "no such
evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put
scare quotes around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know
there "is no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god
character the Christians pray to, it's described as omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't there,
then I'm done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be
omnipresent, if you look into, say, the corner of your living room
and you don't see God then that means God does not exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Unless you're planning to redefine "omnipresent" now too.
Would you like to define it, Fred?
You don't know what it means?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
How would you like your toast, sir?
Zarqawi style, please!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kurt Nicklas" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
11 Jun 2006 06:36:04 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149990576.074486.238070@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for
anti-theists to be making the illogical claim that "no such
evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put
scare quotes around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know
there "is no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god
character the Christians pray to, it's described as omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't there,
then I'm done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be
omnipresent, if you look into, say, the corner of your living room
and you don't see God then that means God does not exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Unless you're planning to redefine "omnipresent" now too.
Would you like to define it, Fred?
You don't know what it means?
You flip from accusing me of wanting to redefine the word to accusing
me of not knowing the meaning?
You're a troll, aren't you, Fred?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
11 Jun 2006 06:59:28 AM |
|
|
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1150025764.745446.127880@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149990576.074486.238070@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for
anti-theists to be making the illogical claim that "no
such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put
scare quotes around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know
there "is no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god
character the Christians pray to, it's described as
omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't
there, then I'm done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be
omnipresent, if you look into, say, the corner of your living
room and you don't see God then that means God does not exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Unless you're planning to redefine "omnipresent" now too.
Would you like to define it, Fred?
You don't know what it means?
You flip from accusing me of wanting to redefine the word to accusing
me of not knowing the meaning?
Ah, we're playing games now.
You're a troll, aren't you, Fred?
Do don't act so surprised, Kurt, I'm sure you recognize your own
methods.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
How would you like your toast, sir?
Zarqawi style, please!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kurt Nicklas" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
11 Jun 2006 08:14:50 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1150025764.745446.127880@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149990576.074486.238070@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for
anti-theists to be making the illogical claim that "no
such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put
scare quotes around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know
there "is no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god
character the Christians pray to, it's described as
omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't
there, then I'm done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be
omnipresent, if you look into, say, the corner of your living
room and you don't see God then that means God does not exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Unless you're planning to redefine "omnipresent" now too.
Would you like to define it, Fred?
You don't know what it means?
You flip from accusing me of wanting to redefine the word to accusing
me of not knowing the meaning?
Ah, we're playing games now.
Ah, no, Fred, it's you who can't make up his mind now.
You're very confused.
You're a troll, aren't you, Fred?
Do don't act so surprised, Kurt, I'm sure you recognize your own
methods.
I'm *not surprised you're a troll, Fred. Lots of anti-theists in this
group are trolls.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
11 Jun 2006 09:04:32 AM |
|
|
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1150031689.974538.25320@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1150025764.745446.127880@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149990576.074486.238070@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
message
news:1149893602.486926.74130
@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com.
..
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for
anti-theists to be making the illogical claim that "no
such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and
put scare quotes around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can
know there "is no evidence" unless you've looked
everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god
character the Christians pray to, it's described as
omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't
there, then I'm done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be
omnipresent, if you look into, say, the corner of your living
room and you don't see God then that means God does not
exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Unless you're planning to redefine "omnipresent" now too.
Would you like to define it, Fred?
You don't know what it means?
You flip from accusing me of wanting to redefine the word to
accusing me of not knowing the meaning?
Ah, we're playing games now.
Ah, no, Fred, it's you who can't make up his mind now.
You're very confused.
I know exactly what I'm doing. Don't you?
You're a troll, aren't you, Fred?
Do don't act so surprised, Kurt, I'm sure you recognize your own
methods.
I'm *not surprised you're a troll, Fred. Lots of anti-theists in this
group are trolls.
So you *do* recognize your own methods. Good for you.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
How would you like your toast, sir?
Zarqawi style, please!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kurt Nicklas" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
11 Jun 2006 01:00:59 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1150031689.974538.25320@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1150025764.745446.127880@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149990576.074486.238070@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in
message
news:1149893602.486926.74130
@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com.
..
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for
anti-theists to be making the illogical claim that "no
such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and
put scare quotes around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can
know there "is no evidence" unless you've looked
everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god
character the Christians pray to, it's described as
omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't
there, then I'm done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be
omnipresent, if you look into, say, the corner of your living
room and you don't see God then that means God does not
exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Unless you're planning to redefine "omnipresent" now too.
Would you like to define it, Fred?
You don't know what it means?
You flip from accusing me of wanting to redefine the word to
accusing me of not knowing the meaning?
Ah, we're playing games now.
Ah, no, Fred, it's you who can't make up his mind now.
You're very confused.
I know exactly what I'm doing. Don't you?
Oh, I do know what you're up to, Fred.
You're a troll, aren't you, Fred?
Do don't act so surprised, Kurt, I'm sure you recognize your own
methods.
I'm *not surprised you're a troll, Fred. Lots of anti-theists in this
group are trolls.
So you *do* recognize your own methods. Good for you.
I recognize *your* methods, Fred.
You're a troll.
<plonk>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
11 Jun 2006 01:01:56 AM |
|
|
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for anti-theists to
be
making
the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put scare
quotes
around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know there "is
no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god character the
Christians pray to, it's described as omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't there, then I'm
done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be omnipresent,
if you look
into, say, the corner of your living room and you don't see God then
that means God does not exist.
Yes. By definition. The god described as omnipresent could not exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Yes.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kurt Nicklas" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
11 Jun 2006 06:15:22 AM |
|
|
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for anti-theists to
be
making
the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put scare
quotes
around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know there "is
no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god character the
Christians pray to, it's described as omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't there, then I'm
done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be omnipresent,
if you look
into, say, the corner of your living room and you don't see God then
that means God does not exist.
Yes. By definition. The god described as omnipresent could not exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Yes.
Well, I guess that settles it then - if you don't see an omnipresent
God in your living room then he must not exist!
Thanks for playing.
{snickers}
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
11 Jun 2006 04:03:20 PM |
|
|
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1150024522.146659.134450@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for anti-theists
to
be
making
the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put scare
quotes
around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know there
"is
no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god character
the
Christians pray to, it's described as omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't there, then
I'm
done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be omnipresent,
if you look
into, say, the corner of your living room and you don't see God then
that means God does not exist.
Yes. By definition. The god described as omnipresent could not exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Yes.
Well, I guess that settles it then - if you don't see an omnipresent
God in your living room then he must not exist!
Yes. By definition.
Thanks for playing.
I note you have absolutely no counter argument.
I win.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kurt Nicklas" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
11 Jun 2006 05:07:14 PM |
|
|
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1150024522.146659.134450@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for anti-theists
to
be
making
the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put scare
quotes
around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know there
"is
no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god character
the
Christians pray to, it's described as omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't there, then
I'm
done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be omnipresent,
if you look
into, say, the corner of your living room and you don't see God then
that means God does not exist.
Yes. By definition. The god described as omnipresent could not exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Yes.
Well, I guess that settles it then - if you don't see an omnipresent
God in your living room then he must not exist!
Yes. By definition.
Yep, if you don't see God in your living room then he must not exist.
And by coincidence, I took a look a look around *my livingroom and I
didn't see God either.
What's happening here??
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
11 Jun 2006 06:55:03 PM |
|
|
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1150063633.956710.190590@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1150024522.146659.134450@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for
anti-theists
to
be
making
the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put
scare
quotes
around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know
there
"is
no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god character
the
Christians pray to, it's described as omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't there,
then
I'm
done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be
omnipresent,
if you look
into, say, the corner of your living room and you don't see God then
that means God does not exist.
Yes. By definition. The god described as omnipresent could not exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Yes.
Well, I guess that settles it then - if you don't see an omnipresent
God in your living room then he must not exist!
Yes. By definition.
Yep, if you don't see God in your living room then he must not exist.
And by coincidence, I took a look a look around *my livingroom and I
didn't see God either.
What's happening here??
What's happening is that you performed a clear and obvious demonstration
that a god defined as omnipresent does not exist.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kurt Nicklas" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey there |
12 Jun 2006 05:41:54 AM |
|
|
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1150063633.956710.190590@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1150024522.146659.134450@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149979049.734211.40780@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149935626.449886.22920@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"Kurt Nicklas" <kurtnicklas@aport2000.ru> wrote in message
news:1149893602.486926.74130@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Seems to me it's much more common in this group for
anti-theists
to
be
making
the illogical claim that "no such evidence exists".
Yes, that's why I said **claims** of solid evidence and put
scare
quotes
around logical.
Do you really have to have this spelled out for you?
What you can "spell out" for me, Dennis, is how you can know
there
"is
no evidence" unless you've looked everywhere.
I don't have to look everywhere. If we're talking the god character
the
Christians pray to, it's described as omnipresent.
Therefore, if I look in even one place, and the god isn't there,
then
I'm
done.
So what you're saying is that since God is claimed to be
omnipresent,
if you look
into, say, the corner of your living room and you don't see God then
that means God does not exist.
Yes. By definition. The god described as omnipresent could not exist.
Is that what you're saying?
Yes.
Well, I guess that settles it then - if you don't see an omnipresent
God in your living room then he must not exist!
Yes. By definition.
Yep, if you don't see God in your living room then he must not exist.
And by coincidence, I took a look a look around *my livingroom and I
didn't see God either.
What's happening here??
What's happening is that you performed a clear and obvious demonstration
that a god defined as omnipresent does not exist.
And of course everything present in your living room is visible to the
5 senses, right?
The senses are never wrong, are they?
I think you've got it!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
