| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"duke" |
| Date: |
03 Oct 2006 10:29:18 PM |
| Object: |
Hey, yang, lookie at this one. |
Scandal: Right after Mark Foley was revealed to have had inappropriate
e-mail conversations with a 16-year-old page, he resigned and checked
into rehab. Now, what did Democrats know, and when did they know it?
In 1983, then-Democratic Rep. Gerry Studds of Massachusetts was caught
in a similar situation. In his case, Studds had sex with a male teenage
page -- something Foley hasn't been charged with.
Did Studds express contrition? Resign? Quite the contrary. He rejected
Congress' censure of him and continued to represent his district until
his retirement in 1996.
In 1989, Rep. Barney Frank (news, bio, voting record), also of
Massachusetts, admitted he'd lived with Steve Gobie, a male prostitute
who ran a gay sex-for-hire ring out of Frank's apartment. Frank, it was
later discovered, used his position to fix 33 parking tickets for
Gobie.
What happened to Frank? The House voted 408-18 to reprimand him -- a
slap on the wrist. Today he's an honored Democratic member of Congress,
much in demand as a speaker and "conscience of the party."
In 2001, President Clinton, who had his own intern problem,
commuted the prison sentence of Illinois Rep. Mel Reynolds, who had sex
with a 16-year-old campaign volunteer and pressured her to lie about
it. (Reynolds also was convicted of campaign spending violations.)
You get the idea. Democrats not only seem OK with the kind of behavior
for which Foley is charged, but also they protect and excuse it. Only
when it's a Republican do they proclaim themselves shocked -- shocked!
-- when it comes to light.
Taken from
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ibd/20061002/bs_ibd_ibd/2006102issues01
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, yang, lookie at this one. |
04 Oct 2006 02:21:29 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 17:29:18 -0500, duke wrote:
Scandal: Right after Mark Foley was revealed to have had inappropriate
e-mail conversations with a 16-year-old page, duke started explaining
why it's okay if you're a Republican.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "leo" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, yang, lookie at this one. |
03 Oct 2006 11:05:00 PM |
|
|
duke ha escrito:
Scandal: Right after Mark Foley was revealed to have had inappropriate
e-mail conversations with a 16-year-old page, he resigned and checked
into rehab. Now, what did Democrats know, and when did they know it?
In 1983, then-Democratic Rep. Gerry Studds of Massachusetts was caught
in a similar situation. In his case, Studds had sex with a male teenage
page -- something Foley hasn't been charged with.
Did Studds express contrition? Resign? Quite the contrary. He rejected
Congress' censure of him and continued to represent his district until
his retirement in 1996.
In 1989, Rep. Barney Frank (news, bio, voting record), also of
Massachusetts, admitted he'd lived with Steve Gobie, a male prostitute
who ran a gay sex-for-hire ring out of Frank's apartment. Frank, it was
later discovered, used his position to fix 33 parking tickets for
Gobie.
What happened to Frank? The House voted 408-18 to reprimand him -- a
slap on the wrist. Today he's an honored Democratic member of Congress,
much in demand as a speaker and "conscience of the party."
In 2001, President Clinton, who had his own intern problem,
commuted the prison sentence of Illinois Rep. Mel Reynolds, who had sex
with a 16-year-old campaign volunteer and pressured her to lie about
it. (Reynolds also was convicted of campaign spending violations.)
You get the idea. Democrats not only seem OK with the kind of behavior
for which Foley is charged, but also they protect and excuse it. Only
when it's a Republican do they proclaim themselves shocked -- shocked!
-- when it comes to light.
Taken from
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ibd/20061002/bs_ibd_ibd/2006102issues01
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
Dear Duke.
This democrate you pointed was not making a campaing against
pedophiles, to enhance the penalties they have to suffer after being
out of jail and bla, bla, bla,
You Christians liers are trying to paint yourselves as some class of
saints, but you are mostly a great bunch of hypocrites.
More often than not, priests are more often involved into pedophilia
than the average bloke. You have to divide the number of priest
charged for the number of priests of the country, then do take the
number of the secular pedophiles and divide it by the average secular
male population.
You even tried to play the dirty trick of uncovering Clinton on an
affaire totally instrascendent. The troubled with Clinton was to
play the hycritical role. When he was asked, "Have you been anfaithful
to your wife?" he should have answered, "this is not any of your
fucking business." And he insisted, he should have answer, "what if I
did? This is not your fucking business." In this case, the fucking
explative would be the proper one for the case involved. At the third
or fourth question, he shgould have to tell, "yes, fucking, yes. Is
there not any fucking thing to worry about in this forsaking country?
What sort of morons are you?"
But definitely, US country is not a model of freedoms to the world
anymore, but a model of sanctimonious christo-fascists. I foresee a
very a sad future for the US people.
Leopoldo
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, yang, lookie at this one. |
04 Oct 2006 10:05:27 PM |
|
|
On 3 Oct 2006 16:05:00 -0700, "leo" <leopoldo.perdomo@gmail.com> wrote:
duke ha escrito:
Scandal: Right after Mark Foley was revealed to have had inappropriate
e-mail conversations with a 16-year-old page, he resigned and checked
into rehab. Now, what did Democrats know, and when did they know it?
In 1983, then-Democratic Rep. Gerry Studds of Massachusetts was caught
in a similar situation. In his case, Studds had sex with a male teenage
page -- something Foley hasn't been charged with.
Did Studds express contrition? Resign? Quite the contrary. He rejected
Congress' censure of him and continued to represent his district until
his retirement in 1996.
In 1989, Rep. Barney Frank (news, bio, voting record), also of
Massachusetts, admitted he'd lived with Steve Gobie, a male prostitute
who ran a gay sex-for-hire ring out of Frank's apartment. Frank, it was
later discovered, used his position to fix 33 parking tickets for
Gobie.
What happened to Frank? The House voted 408-18 to reprimand him -- a
slap on the wrist. Today he's an honored Democratic member of Congress,
much in demand as a speaker and "conscience of the party."
In 2001, President Clinton, who had his own intern problem,
commuted the prison sentence of Illinois Rep. Mel Reynolds, who had sex
with a 16-year-old campaign volunteer and pressured her to lie about
it. (Reynolds also was convicted of campaign spending violations.)
You get the idea. Democrats not only seem OK with the kind of behavior
for which Foley is charged, but also they protect and excuse it. Only
when it's a Republican do they proclaim themselves shocked -- shocked!
-- when it comes to light.
Taken from
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ibd/20061002/bs_ibd_ibd/2006102issues01
Dear Duke.
This democrate you pointed was not making a campaing against
pedophiles, to enhance the penalties they have to suffer after being
out of jail and bla, bla, bla,
Yeah, they were honored to be a part of the 'rat party.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
