Religions > Atheism > High court upholds Oregon assisted-suicide law 6-3 majority says state powers trump federal authority
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"stoney" |
| Date: |
17 Jan 2006 09:29:14 AM |
| Object: |
High court upholds Oregon assisted-suicide law 6-3 majority says state powers trump federal authority |
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10891536/
High court upholds Oregon assisted-suicide law
6-3 majority says state powers trump federal authority
BREAKING NEWS
The Associated Press
Updated: 10:14 a.m. ET Jan. 17, 2006
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld Oregon’s one-of-a-kind
physician-assisted suicide law, rejecting a Bush administration attempt
to punish doctors who help terminally ill patients die.
Justices, on a 6-3 vote, said the 1997 Oregon law used to end the lives
of more than 200 seriously ill people trumped federal authority to
regulate doctors.
That means the administration improperly tried to use a federal drug law
to prosecute Oregon doctors who prescribe overdoses. Then-Attorney
General John Ashcroft vowed to do that in 2001, saying that
doctor-assisted suicide is not a “legitimate medical purpose.”
Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, said the federal
government does, indeed, have the authority to go after drug dealers and
pass rules for health and safety.
But Oregon’s law covers only extremely sick people — those with
incurable diseases, whom at least two doctors agree have six months or
less to live and are of sound mind.
© 2006 The Associated Press
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: High court upholds Oregon assisted-suicide law 6-3 majority says state powers trump federal authority |
17 Jan 2006 09:35:58 AM |
|
|
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
news:r33qs1p691sscmtvrng5ge3g1bcqdd02vr@4ax.com...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10891536/
High court upholds Oregon assisted-suicide law
6-3 majority says state powers trump federal authority
BREAKING NEWS
The Associated Press
Updated: 10:14 a.m. ET Jan. 17, 2006
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld Oregon's one-of-a-kind
physician-assisted suicide law, rejecting a Bush administration attempt
to punish doctors who help terminally ill patients die.
Justices, on a 6-3 vote, said the 1997 Oregon law used to end the lives
of more than 200 seriously ill people trumped federal authority to
regulate doctors.
That means the administration improperly tried to use a federal drug law
to prosecute Oregon doctors who prescribe overdoses. Then-Attorney
General John Ashcroft vowed to do that in 2001, saying that
doctor-assisted suicide is not a "legitimate medical purpose."
Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, said the federal
government does, indeed, have the authority to go after drug dealers and
pass rules for health and safety.
But Oregon's law covers only extremely sick people - those with
incurable diseases, whom at least two doctors agree have six months or
less to live and are of sound mind.
Excellent news!
http://www.deathwithdignity.org/historyfacts/gonzalesvoregon.asp
LC~ Remembers when the the Repugs championed 'states rights'.
"Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending
over.." ~ Frank Zappa
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "*nemo*" |
|
| Title: Re: High court upholds Oregon assisted-suicide law 6-3 majority says state powers trump federal authority |
17 Jan 2006 07:18:48 PM |
|
|
In article <r33qs1p691sscmtvrng5ge3g1bcqdd02vr@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld Oregon’s one-of-a-kind
physician-assisted suicide law, rejecting a Bush administration attempt
to punish doctors who help terminally ill patients die.
Justices, on a 6-3 vote, said the 1997 Oregon law used to end the lives
of more than 200 seriously ill people trumped federal authority to
regulate doctors.
That means the administration improperly tried to use a federal drug law
to prosecute Oregon doctors who prescribe overdoses. Then-Attorney
General John Ashcroft vowed to do that in 2001, saying that
doctor-assisted suicide is not a “legitimate medical purpose.”
Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, said the federal
government does, indeed, have the authority to go after drug dealers and
pass rules for health and safety.
But Oregon’s law covers only extremely sick people — those with
incurable diseases, whom at least two doctors agree have six months or
less to live and are of sound mind.
I saw that the ACLJ is all in a tizzy over this. They said that now,
other states will be likely to pass similar laws.
One can only hope...
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: High court upholds Oregon assisted-suicide law 6-3 majority says state powers trump federal authority |
21 Jan 2006 07:27:24 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:18:48 GMT, *nemo*
<nemo0037@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> wrote in alt.atheism
In article <r33qs1p691sscmtvrng5ge3g1bcqdd02vr@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld Oregon’s one-of-a-kind
physician-assisted suicide law, rejecting a Bush administration attempt
to punish doctors who help terminally ill patients die.
Justices, on a 6-3 vote, said the 1997 Oregon law used to end the lives
of more than 200 seriously ill people trumped federal authority to
regulate doctors.
That means the administration improperly tried to use a federal drug law
to prosecute Oregon doctors who prescribe overdoses. Then-Attorney
General John Ashcroft vowed to do that in 2001, saying that
doctor-assisted suicide is not a “legitimate medical purpose.”
Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, said the federal
government does, indeed, have the authority to go after drug dealers and
pass rules for health and safety.
But Oregon’s law covers only extremely sick people — those with
incurable diseases, whom at least two doctors agree have six months or
less to live and are of sound mind.
I saw that the ACLJ is all in a tizzy over this. They said that now,
other states will be likely to pass similar laws.
One can only hope...
Indeed.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "William Wingstedt" |
|
| Title: Re: High court upholds Oregon assisted-suicide law 6-3 majority says state powers trump federal authority |
17 Jan 2006 11:13:26 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:29:14 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10891536/
High court upholds Oregon assisted-suicide law
6-3 majority says state powers trump federal authority
BREAKING NEWS
The Associated Press
Updated: 10:14 a.m. ET Jan. 17, 2006
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld Oregon’s one-of-a-kind
physician-assisted suicide law, rejecting a Bush administration attempt
to punish doctors who help terminally ill patients die.
Justices, on a 6-3 vote, said the 1997 Oregon law used to end the lives
of more than 200 seriously ill people trumped federal authority to
regulate doctors.
That means the administration improperly tried to use a federal drug law
to prosecute Oregon doctors who prescribe overdoses. Then-Attorney
General John Ashcroft vowed to do that in 2001, saying that
doctor-assisted suicide is not a “legitimate medical purpose.”
Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, said the federal
government does, indeed, have the authority to go after drug dealers and
pass rules for health and safety.
But Oregon’s law covers only extremely sick people — those with
incurable diseases, whom at least two doctors agree have six months or
less to live and are of sound mind.
© 2006 The Associated Press
So, will the Bushies go to jail, or at least be charged with a
timeout, or will they just move on and violate some other principal of
the very "freedom" they claim to be promulgating? Maybe they'll
reimburse the taxpayers for the cost of prosecuting the Bush campaign
version of "I believe in state's rights".
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: High court upholds Oregon assisted-suicide law 6-3 majority says state powers trump federal authority |
21 Jan 2006 07:27:02 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:13:26 GMT, (William
Wingstedt) wrote in alt.atheism
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:29:14 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10891536/
High court upholds Oregon assisted-suicide law
6-3 majority says state powers trump federal authority
BREAKING NEWS
The Associated Press
Updated: 10:14 a.m. ET Jan. 17, 2006
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld Oregon’s one-of-a-kind
physician-assisted suicide law, rejecting a Bush administration attempt
to punish doctors who help terminally ill patients die.
Justices, on a 6-3 vote, said the 1997 Oregon law used to end the lives
of more than 200 seriously ill people trumped federal authority to
regulate doctors.
That means the administration improperly tried to use a federal drug law
to prosecute Oregon doctors who prescribe overdoses. Then-Attorney
General John Ashcroft vowed to do that in 2001, saying that
doctor-assisted suicide is not a “legitimate medical purpose.”
Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, said the federal
government does, indeed, have the authority to go after drug dealers and
pass rules for health and safety.
But Oregon’s law covers only extremely sick people — those with
incurable diseases, whom at least two doctors agree have six months or
less to live and are of sound mind.
© 2006 The Associated Press
So, will the Bushies go to jail, or at least be charged with a
timeout, or will they just move on and violate some other principal of
the very "freedom" they claim to be promulgating? Maybe they'll
reimburse the taxpayers for the cost of prosecuting the Bush campaign
version of "I believe in state's rights".
None of the above. They'll gnash their teeth and wail and whine.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|