"eddie wilson" <rquigney85@rcn.com> wrote in
news:1110990184.270132.212960@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:

Fred Stone wrote:

"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:39qc8rF63ne91U1@individual.net:

TV's Fred Stone wrote:

Kevin Anthoney <kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:6fde$42373bc9$51569c09$7859@nf1.news-service.com:

Fred Stone wrote:

"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:39mdomF63e1jsU1@individual.net:

TV's Fred Stone wrote:

"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:39kjjnF5urugrU1@individual.net:

TV's Fred Stone wrote:

Hillary's First Night As President

Fred Stone shits his pants and throws a four-year temper
tantrum, along with the rest of the GOP.

Projecting again, towelie? How many years of temper tantrums will
you and the other Moore-ons have been pitching by 2009?

Clinton was impeached for a BJ. Dumbya hasn't been impeached
although he has violated thousands of laws, both international and
domestic. Now which party throws long temper tantrums? Nuff said.

You can't even manage to remember that Clinton was impeached for
lying to a grand jury, not for getting a BJ in the Oral Office.
You're a fine example of liberal stupidity.

Oh, come on. The whole Paula Jones thing was little more than a
kangaroo court stage managed by the Nutcase Right.

So what? That still doesn't mean that Clinton was impeached for
getting a *****.

That's the difference between right-wingnuts such as yourself and
rational moderates and leftists. The right argues technicalities and
semantics, while the left reads between the lines and has the courage
to admit the truth. This was a cause-effect situation. The cause was
the BJ and the effect was the impeachment trial.

The cause was his sexual harrassment of Paula Jones and others. There

were rape charges out there too.

The reasoning given
for the impeachment was perjury, but the reality of the situation is
that he was indeed impeached for the BJ.

That's the difference between left-wingnuts like you and rational
conservatives like myself. The left starts with the conclusions they
want and rationalizes them with specious chains of bogus "logic"
while the right starts with the facts and draws their conclusions
from the evidence and their own understanding of human nature and
reality.

Try applying this logic to the Iraq war.

Try sticking to the subject.

"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:39qc8rF63ne91U1@individual.net:

TV's Fred Stone wrote:

Kevin Anthoney <kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:6fde$42373bc9$51569c09$7859@nf1.news-service.com:

Fred Stone wrote:

"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:39mdomF63e1jsU1@individual.net:

TV's Fred Stone wrote:

"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:39kjjnF5urugrU1@individual.net:

TV's Fred Stone wrote:

Hillary's First Night As President

Fred Stone shits his pants and throws a four-year temper
tantrum, along with the rest of the GOP.

Projecting again, towelie? How many years of temper tantrums will
you and the other Moore-ons have been pitching by 2009?

Clinton was impeached for a BJ. Dumbya hasn't been impeached
although he has violated thousands of laws, both international and
domestic. Now which party throws long temper tantrums? Nuff said.

You can't even manage to remember that Clinton was impeached for
lying to a grand jury, not for getting a BJ in the Oral Office.
You're a fine example of liberal stupidity.

Oh, come on. The whole Paula Jones thing was little more than a
kangaroo court stage managed by the Nutcase Right.

So what? That still doesn't mean that Clinton was impeached for
getting a *****.

That's the difference between right-wingnuts such as yourself and
rational moderates and leftists. The right argues technicalities and
semantics, while the left reads between the lines and has the courage
to admit the truth. This was a cause-effect situation. The cause was
the BJ and the effect was the impeachment trial.

The cause was his sexual harrassment of Paula Jones and others. There
were rape charges out there too.

The reasoning given
for the impeachment was perjury, but the reality of the situation is
that he was indeed impeached for the BJ.

That's the difference between left-wingnuts like you and rational
conservatives like myself. The left starts with the conclusions they
want

and rationalizes them with specious chains of bogus "logic"

while the right starts with the facts and draws their conclusions from
the evidence and their own understanding of human nature and reality.

"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:39qc8rF63ne91U1@individual.net:

TV's Fred Stone wrote:

Kevin Anthoney <kevin_anthoney@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:6fde$42373bc9$51569c09$7859@nf1.news-service.com:

Fred Stone wrote:

"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:39mdomF63e1jsU1@individual.net:

TV's Fred Stone wrote:

"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:39kjjnF5urugrU1@individual.net:

TV's Fred Stone wrote:

Hillary's First Night As President

Fred Stone shits his pants and throws a four-year temper
tantrum, along with the rest of the GOP.

Projecting again, towelie? How many years of temper tantrums will
you and the other Moore-ons have been pitching by 2009?

Clinton was impeached for a BJ. Dumbya hasn't been impeached
although he has violated thousands of laws, both international and
domestic. Now which party throws long temper tantrums? Nuff said.

You can't even manage to remember that Clinton was impeached for
lying to a grand jury, not for getting a BJ in the Oral Office.
You're a fine example of liberal stupidity.

Oh, come on. The whole Paula Jones thing was little more than a
kangaroo court stage managed by the Nutcase Right.

So what? That still doesn't mean that Clinton was impeached for
getting a *****.

That's the difference between right-wingnuts such as yourself and
rational moderates and leftists. The right argues technicalities and
semantics, while the left reads between the lines and has the courage
to admit the truth. This was a cause-effect situation. The cause was
the BJ and the effect was the impeachment trial.

The cause was his sexual harrassment of Paula Jones and others. There
were rape charges out there too.

The reasoning given
for the impeachment was perjury, but the reality of the situation is
that he was indeed impeached for the BJ.

That's the difference between left-wingnuts like you and rational
conservatives