Historical warfare in the middle east.



 Religions > Atheism > Historical warfare in the middle east.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Eris"
Date: 31 Aug 2007 10:30:21 PM
Object: Historical warfare in the middle east.
Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?
Thanks
--
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
.

User: "redc1c4"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 01 Sep 2007 02:28:08 AM
Eris wrote:


Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?

yes.
redc1c4,
you might try learning to read, and then studying history. %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."
Army Officer's Guide
.
User: "Eris"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 01 Sep 2007 11:35:10 AM
On Sep 1, 3:28 am, redc1c4 <redc...@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote:

Eris wrote:

Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


yes.

redc1c4,
you might try learning to read, and then studying history. %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide

you may post something substantial some day.
.
User: "AUK Registrar"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 12:42:31 PM
In <1188664510.117267.324090@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, Eris
<vithant@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sep 1, 3:28 am, redc1c4 <redc...@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote:

Eris wrote:

Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


yes.

redc1c4,
you might try learning to read, and then studying history. %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide


you may post something substantial some day.

You may post something that doesn't have BAIT spray painted over it some
day.
But I doubt it.
.

User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 01 Sep 2007 08:15:13 PM
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:35:10 -0700, Eris <vithant@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sep 1, 3:28 am, redc1c4 <redc...@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote:

Eris wrote:

Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


yes.

redc1c4,
you might try learning to read, and then studying history. %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."

Army Officer's Guide


you may post something substantial some day.

I doubt it, unless it gets a brain transplant.
.



User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 01 Sep 2007 01:59:46 AM
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:30:21 -0700, Eris <vithant@gmail.com> wrote:

Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?

The Jews invading Palestine in the 1940s is a good example of both.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 01 Sep 2007 03:54:33 PM
On Aug 31, 11:59 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:30:21 -0700, Eris <vith...@gmail.com> wrote:

Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


The Jews invading Palestine in the 1940s is a good example of both.

I don't know of any such invasion. I know that Egypt, Syria, Jordan (a
country consisting of some 70% of the British Mandate of Palestine,
Saudia Arabia, Iraq, and more all declared war on Israel and attacked.
And lost that war. And so Egypt occupied Gaza, supposedly Palestine,
and Jordan occupied the West Bank, also supposedly Palestine. And
neither of those countries gave the "Palestinians" rights, they did
not set up an independent country, they did not even discuss the
existence of such a country. Historical revisionism is an interesting
process, particularly when it runs up against facts.
.
User: "i2p6 west"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 07:06:59 AM
wrote:

On Aug 31, 11:59 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:30:21 -0700, Eris <vith...@gmail.com> wrote:

Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


The Jews invading Palestine in the 1940s is a good example of both.



I don't know of any such invasion. I know that Egypt, Syria, Jordan (a
country consisting of some 70% of the British Mandate of Palestine,
Saudia Arabia, Iraq, and more all declared war on Israel and attacked.
And lost that war. And so Egypt occupied Gaza, supposedly Palestine,
and Jordan occupied the West Bank, also supposedly Palestine. And
neither of those countries gave the "Palestinians" rights, they did
not set up an independent country, they did not even discuss the
existence of such a country.

They certainly did talk about an independent Palestine...Your statement is completely false.
They did not accept Jewish Israel imposed boundaries...Your statement is completely false.
Historical revisionism is an interesting

process, particularly when it runs up against facts.


.
User: "Matt Silberstein"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 10:25:50 AM
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 05:06:59 -0700, i2p6 west <i2p6west@nospam.com>
wrote:

matts2@ix.netcom.com wrote:

On Aug 31, 11:59 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:30:21 -0700, Eris <vith...@gmail.com> wrote:

Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


The Jews invading Palestine in the 1940s is a good example of both.



I don't know of any such invasion. I know that Egypt, Syria, Jordan (a
country consisting of some 70% of the British Mandate of Palestine,
Saudia Arabia, Iraq, and more all declared war on Israel and attacked.
And lost that war. And so Egypt occupied Gaza, supposedly Palestine,
and Jordan occupied the West Bank, also supposedly Palestine. And
neither of those countries gave the "Palestinians" rights, they did
not set up an independent country, they did not even discuss the
existence of such a country.


They certainly did talk about an independent Palestine...Your statement is completely false.

Please find some documents from Egypt or Jordan discussing an
independent Palestine prior to 1967. And find out when Jordan gave up
its claim to the West Bank.

They did not accept Jewish Israel imposed boundaries...Your statement is completely false.

The *UN* imposed the boundaries of 1947, not Israel.

Historical revisionism is an interesting

process, particularly when it runs up against facts.


.
User: "i2p6 west"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 08:58:48 AM
Matt Silberstein wrote:


They did not accept Jewish Israel imposed boundaries...Your statement is completely false.



The *UN* imposed the boundaries of 1947, not Israel.

No, stupid, after UN partition in 1947 Jewish Israel declared independence in 1948, sparking
the war, all resulting in new Jewish Israel imposed, not UN, boundaries.
Go read a history book you stupid *****.



Historical revisionism is an interesting

process, particularly when it runs up against facts.


.
User: "Matt Silberstein"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 06:51:22 PM
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 06:58:48 -0700, in alt.atheism , i2p6 west
<i2p6west@nospam.com> in <13dlgbvbvmd9ad5@corp.supernews.com> wrote:

Matt Silberstein wrote:


They did not accept Jewish Israel imposed boundaries...Your statement is completely false.



The *UN* imposed the boundaries of 1947, not Israel.


No, stupid, after UN partition in 1947 Jewish Israel declared independence in 1948, sparking
the war, all resulting in new Jewish Israel imposed, not UN, boundaries.

How was the Israeli acceptance of the Partition Plan somehow the spark
of the war?

Go read a history book you stupid *****.

What Nazi book do you recommend I read?
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.




User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 01 Sep 2007 08:14:44 PM
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:54:33 -0700,
wrote:

On Aug 31, 11:59 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:30:21 -0700, Eris <vith...@gmail.com> wrote:

Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


The Jews invading Palestine in the 1940s is a good example of both.


I don't know of any such invasion.

Then you had better learn some history.
Pre 1940s: No Israel.
Post 1940s: Israel, by force over the original inhabitants.
Please tell me that you are aware of this invasion?

I know that Egypt, Syria, Jordan (a
country consisting of some 70% of the British Mandate of Palestine,
Saudia Arabia, Iraq, and more all declared war on Israel and attacked.
And lost that war. And so Egypt occupied Gaza, supposedly Palestine,
and Jordan occupied the West Bank, also supposedly Palestine. And
neither of those countries gave the "Palestinians" rights, they did
not set up an independent country, they did not even discuss the
existence of such a country. Historical revisionism is an interesting
process, particularly when it runs up against facts.

.
User: "i2p6 west"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 02:51:58 AM
Michael Gray wrote:

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:54:33 -0700,

wrote:


On Aug 31, 11:59 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:30:21 -0700, Eris <vith...@gmail.com> wrote:

Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


The Jews invading Palestine in the 1940s is a good example of both.


I don't know of any such invasion.



Then you had better learn some history.
Pre 1940s: No Israel.
Post 1940s: Israel, by force over the original inhabitants.

Please tell me that you are aware of this invasion?

The Jews started going to Palestine around 1890, largely as a result of Theodore Herzl's
pamphlet "The Jewish State". At that time there were about 7,000 Jews lively peacefully
with about 750,000 Palestinians (according to Herzl). The Arabs were naive to allow the
Jews to immigrate in large numbers and got screwed.
btw, interestingly, the Arabs proposed, and would have accepted, a *true* democracy to
the U.N. (U.S.) before the 1947 partition into a Jewish sector. The document used to
be available at the U.N. website, I don't know if it's still there as Jewish elements
work very hard to erase unfavorable history.
I think it is shameful that we Americans created and prop up a *religion* based
government, Jewish Israel, the long festering sore of the Middle East.



I know that Egypt, Syria, Jordan (a
country consisting of some 70% of the British Mandate of Palestine,
Saudia Arabia, Iraq, and more all declared war on Israel and attacked.
And lost that war. And so Egypt occupied Gaza, supposedly Palestine,
and Jordan occupied the West Bank, also supposedly Palestine. And
neither of those countries gave the "Palestinians" rights, they did
not set up an independent country, they did not even discuss the
existence of such a country. Historical revisionism is an interesting
process, particularly when it runs up against facts.

.
User: "Matt Silberstein"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 10:23:45 AM
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 00:51:58 -0700, i2p6 west <i2p6west@nospam.com>
wrote:

Michael Gray wrote:

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:54:33 -0700,

wrote:


On Aug 31, 11:59 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:30:21 -0700, Eris <vith...@gmail.com> wrote:

Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


The Jews invading Palestine in the 1940s is a good example of both.


I don't know of any such invasion.



Then you had better learn some history.
Pre 1940s: No Israel.
Post 1940s: Israel, by force over the original inhabitants.

Please tell me that you are aware of this invasion?


The Jews started going to Palestine around 1890, largely as a result of Theodore Herzl's
pamphlet "The Jewish State". At that time there were about 7,000 Jews lively peacefully
with about 750,000 Palestinians (according to Herzl).

Are those numbers accurate or just useful to you?

The Arabs were naive to allow the
Jews to immigrate in large numbers and got screwed.

The Arabs did not "allow" it. The land was controlled by the Turks who
allowed it. The people who owned the land sold it. And the Arabs
continued to use violence against the Jews.

btw, interestingly, the Arabs proposed, and would have accepted, a *true* democracy to
the U.N. (U.S.) before the 1947 partition into a Jewish sector. The document used to
be available at the U.N. website, I don't know if it's still there as Jewish elements
work very hard to erase unfavorable history.

Of course the Jews control everything and erased the evidence. How
convenient for your bigotry.

I think it is shameful that we Americans created and prop up a *religion* based
government, Jewish Israel, the long festering sore of the Middle East.



I know that Egypt, Syria, Jordan (a
country consisting of some 70% of the British Mandate of Palestine,
Saudia Arabia, Iraq, and more all declared war on Israel and attacked.
And lost that war. And so Egypt occupied Gaza, supposedly Palestine,
and Jordan occupied the West Bank, also supposedly Palestine. And
neither of those countries gave the "Palestinians" rights, they did
not set up an independent country, they did not even discuss the
existence of such a country. Historical revisionism is an interesting
process, particularly when it runs up against facts.

.
User: "i2p6 west"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 08:22:23 AM
Matt Silberstein wrote:

On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 00:51:58 -0700, i2p6 west <i2p6west@nospam.com>
wrote:


Michael Gray wrote:


On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:54:33 -0700,

wrote:



On Aug 31, 11:59 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:


On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:30:21 -0700, Eris <vith...@gmail.com> wrote:


Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


The Jews invading Palestine in the 1940s is a good example of both.


I don't know of any such invasion.



Then you had better learn some history.
Pre 1940s: No Israel.
Post 1940s: Israel, by force over the original inhabitants.

Please tell me that you are aware of this invasion?


The Jews started going to Palestine around 1890, largely as a result of Theodore Herzl's
pamphlet "The Jewish State". At that time there were about 7,000 Jews lively peacefully
with about 750,000 Palestinians (according to Herzl).



Are those numbers accurate or just useful to you?


The Arabs were naive to allow the
Jews to immigrate in large numbers and got screwed.



The Arabs did not "allow" it. The land was controlled by the Turks who
allowed it. The people who owned the land sold it. And the Arabs
continued to use violence against the Jews.


btw, interestingly, the Arabs proposed, and would have accepted, a *true* democracy to
the U.N. (U.S.) before the 1947 partition into a Jewish sector. The document used to
be available at the U.N. website, I don't know if it's still there as Jewish elements
work very hard to erase unfavorable history.



Of course the Jews control everything and erased the evidence. How
convenient for your bigotry.

Ah, bigotry? Do you mean anti-Jewish-Israel or anti-Jewish-anything?
How quickly you assholes get to the anti-semitism charge. Next, the sympathy-sucking Holocaust?
Do you know why American politicians are afraid to say anything against Jewish Israel?
Can you assholes admit to how powerful the Jewish Lobby is in American politics?



I think it is shameful that we Americans created and prop up a *religion* based
government, Jewish Israel, the long festering sore of the Middle East.



I know that Egypt, Syria, Jordan (a
country consisting of some 70% of the British Mandate of Palestine,
Saudia Arabia, Iraq, and more all declared war on Israel and attacked.
And lost that war. And so Egypt occupied Gaza, supposedly Palestine,
and Jordan occupied the West Bank, also supposedly Palestine. And
neither of those countries gave the "Palestinians" rights, they did
not set up an independent country, they did not even discuss the
existence of such a country. Historical revisionism is an interesting
process, particularly when it runs up against facts.

.
User: "Matt Silberstein"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 06:49:49 PM
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 06:22:23 -0700, in alt.atheism , i2p6 west
<i2p6west@nospam.com> in <13dle7mmj894vc1@corp.supernews.com> wrote:

Matt Silberstein wrote:

On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 00:51:58 -0700, i2p6 west <i2p6west@nospam.com>
wrote:


Michael Gray wrote:


On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:54:33 -0700,

wrote:



On Aug 31, 11:59 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:


On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:30:21 -0700, Eris <vith...@gmail.com> wrote:


Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


The Jews invading Palestine in the 1940s is a good example of both.


I don't know of any such invasion.



Then you had better learn some history.
Pre 1940s: No Israel.
Post 1940s: Israel, by force over the original inhabitants.

Please tell me that you are aware of this invasion?


The Jews started going to Palestine around 1890, largely as a result of Theodore Herzl's
pamphlet "The Jewish State". At that time there were about 7,000 Jews lively peacefully
with about 750,000 Palestinians (according to Herzl).



Are those numbers accurate or just useful to you?


The Arabs were naive to allow the
Jews to immigrate in large numbers and got screwed.



The Arabs did not "allow" it. The land was controlled by the Turks who
allowed it. The people who owned the land sold it. And the Arabs
continued to use violence against the Jews.


btw, interestingly, the Arabs proposed, and would have accepted, a *true* democracy to
the U.N. (U.S.) before the 1947 partition into a Jewish sector. The document used to
be available at the U.N. website, I don't know if it's still there as Jewish elements
work very hard to erase unfavorable history.



Of course the Jews control everything and erased the evidence. How
convenient for your bigotry.


Ah, bigotry? Do you mean anti-Jewish-Israel or anti-Jewish-anything?
How quickly you assholes get to the anti-semitism charge.

Did you think you could write about "Jewish elements" working to fake
history and somehow have your anti-Semitism escape notice?

Next, the sympathy-sucking Holocaust?

I guess you did not expect to hide it.
[snip]
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.



User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 04:03:54 AM
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 00:51:58 -0700, i2p6 west <i2p6west@nospam.com>
wrote:

Michael Gray wrote:

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:54:33 -0700,

wrote:


On Aug 31, 11:59 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:30:21 -0700, Eris <vith...@gmail.com> wrote:

Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


The Jews invading Palestine in the 1940s is a good example of both.


I don't know of any such invasion.



Then you had better learn some history.
Pre 1940s: No Israel.
Post 1940s: Israel, by force over the original inhabitants.

Please tell me that you are aware of this invasion?


The Jews started going to Palestine around 1890, largely as a result of Theodore Herzl's
pamphlet "The Jewish State". At that time there were about 7,000 Jews lively peacefully
with about 750,000 Palestinians (according to Herzl). The Arabs were naive to allow the
Jews to immigrate in large numbers and got screwed.

btw, interestingly, the Arabs proposed, and would have accepted, a *true* democracy to
the U.N. (U.S.) before the 1947 partition into a Jewish sector. The document used to
be available at the U.N. website, I don't know if it's still there as Jewish elements
work very hard to erase unfavorable history.

I think it is shameful that we Americans created and prop up a *religion* based
government, Jewish Israel, the long festering sore of the Middle East.

I shall take that as a 'no'.
.
User: "i2p6 west"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 06:28:16 AM
Michael Gray wrote:

On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 00:51:58 -0700, i2p6 west <i2p6west@nospam.com>
wrote:


Michael Gray wrote:


On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:54:33 -0700,

wrote:



On Aug 31, 11:59 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:


On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:30:21 -0700, Eris <vith...@gmail.com> wrote:


Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


The Jews invading Palestine in the 1940s is a good example of both.


I don't know of any such invasion.



Then you had better learn some history.
Pre 1940s: No Israel.
Post 1940s: Israel, by force over the original inhabitants.

Please tell me that you are aware of this invasion?


The Jews started going to Palestine around 1890, largely as a result of Theodore Herzl's
pamphlet "The Jewish State". At that time there were about 7,000 Jews lively peacefully
with about 750,000 Palestinians (according to Herzl). The Arabs were naive to allow the
Jews to immigrate in large numbers and got screwed.

btw, interestingly, the Arabs proposed, and would have accepted, a *true* democracy to
the U.N. (U.S.) before the 1947 partition into a Jewish sector. The document used to
be available at the U.N. website, I don't know if it's still there as Jewish elements
work very hard to erase unfavorable history.

I think it is shameful that we Americans created and prop up a *religion* based
government, Jewish Israel, the long festering sore of the Middle East.



I shall take that as a 'no'.

Ok. No, there was no invasion in 1940 or 41 or ... You are seriously distorting what
happened. It is better to tell the truth, else you risk alienating people, who will not
believe anything you say.
.



User: "Matt Silberstein"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 10:21:35 AM
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:44:44 +0930, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:54:33 -0700,

wrote:

On Aug 31, 11:59 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:30:21 -0700, Eris <vith...@gmail.com> wrote:

Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?


The Jews invading Palestine in the 1940s is a good example of both.


I don't know of any such invasion.


Then you had better learn some history.
Pre 1940s: No Israel.

And no country of Palestine. There was a British Mandate which was
divided up and most given to Jordan. Then divided again and most given
to the local Arabs.

Post 1940s: Israel, by force over the original inhabitants.

Nope. Jews were there for milinia. Arabs had been using force against
them for centuries and intensified that force over the last part of
the 19th, early 20th century.

Please tell me that you are aware of this invasion?

No invasion.

I know that Egypt, Syria, Jordan (a
country consisting of some 70% of the British Mandate of Palestine,
Saudia Arabia, Iraq, and more all declared war on Israel and attacked.
And lost that war. And so Egypt occupied Gaza, supposedly Palestine,
and Jordan occupied the West Bank, also supposedly Palestine. And
neither of those countries gave the "Palestinians" rights, they did
not set up an independent country, they did not even discuss the
existence of such a country. Historical revisionism is an interesting
process, particularly when it runs up against facts.

Continue to ignore the facts.
.
User: "i2p6 west"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 08:01:26 AM
Matt Silberstein wrote:


And no country of Palestine.

There certainly was a land of Palestine; Theodore Herzl mentions it in his pamphlet "The Jewish State".
The bottom line: the Jews claim God gave them the land and all non-Jews are squatters with
no rights, and the Jews may do whatever they deem necessary to kick the non-Jews off the land,
including killing them.
That is the bottom line. Stupid irrational religious nuts.
.
User: "Matt Silberstein"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 02 Sep 2007 06:50:32 PM
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 06:01:26 -0700, in alt.atheism , i2p6 west
<i2p6west@nospam.com> in <13dld0d4vphjnbb@corp.supernews.com> wrote:

Matt Silberstein wrote:


And no country of Palestine.


There certainly was a land of Palestine; Theodore Herzl mentions it in his pamphlet "The Jewish State".

There was no state, not country, Palestine. There was an area of the
world that had many names.

The bottom line: the Jews claim God gave them the land and all non-Jews are squatters with
no rights, and the Jews may do whatever they deem necessary to kick the non-Jews off the land,
including killing them.

That is the bottom line. Stupid irrational religious nuts.

If you ignore lots of facts you can let your bigotry bloom.
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.






User: "Matt Silberstein"

Title: Re: Historical warfare in the middle east. 01 Sep 2007 12:11:14 AM
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:30:21 -0700, in alt.atheism , Eris
<vithant@gmail.com> in
<1188617421.263807.269520@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> wrote:

Can someone cite a campaign in the middle east in the last 1,500 years
where there was a significant or long lasting change, after the
invaders left? Can anyone cite a short term change?

The Mamluks ruled Egypt for about 250 years. The Turks ruled the
Middle East for about 600. The Mongol invasion of Iran/Iraq changed
things quite a bit. England had serious influence in Egypt for about
150 years. What in particular were you asking about?
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER