Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of Their Own



 Religions > Atheism > Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of Their Own

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "New10."
Date: 23 Sep 2004 11:04:53 PM
Object: Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of Their Own
...

Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of Their Own

By New10.

X

For close to fifty years America has had a pathological fear of a

communist

takeover. Christianity and particularly the Catholic Church was

stimulating

the fear because they recognized that communism was their competitors in
their hostility toward Democracy. I will make a brief case that

Christianity

(the Catholic Church) was projecting their own dark side onto communism.

America had spent so much time, money and lives to buttress

our

front door from

a communist attack. America was oblivious to the fascist incursion through
the back door.

America was hardly aware of this incursion because there was already at

work

a fifth column subverting our basic freedom called Christianity. In our

own

time, the Catholic Church has backed every Fascist who came to power

because

they shared a common anti-democratic philosophy.

It was Hitler in Germany, Franco in Spain, Salazar of

Portugal,

Batista of Cuba, Augusto Pinochet, Chilean Dictator, Mussolini of Italy

and

Ante Pavelic of Crocia, (with the help of Hitler) When Pavelic and his
Ustashi (Nazi) hoards created an independent Catholic state of Croatia

they

murdered hundreds of thousands of men, women, and children because they

were

either Moslems or Eastern Orthodox and in the event any Jews survived
Hitler's

Holocaust was massacred in the Vatican's Holocaust.*

How many lay people know about (or priests who do not speak
Latin) Rome's Syllabus of Condemned opinions?. The syllabus was never
translated into modern language from its original Latin (except by Joseph
McCabe former monk and professor of philosophy and atheist.) a sample of
condemned opinions: (I chose the shorter ones for expediency)

2. Human reason is the sole judge of truth and falseness, good and evil.

It

is a law unto itself and suffices, by its natural resources, to promote

the

welfare of nations

5. Devine revelations is imperfect and therefore subject to continual and
indefinite progress and this corresponds to the advance of human reason.

7. The prophesies and miracles that are contained in Holy Writ are poetic
fiction, and the mysteries of the Christian faith are the outcome of
philosophic inquiries: the contents of both the new and old testaments are
fiction, and Jesus Christ is a mythical figure.

8. Since human reason is as valuable as religion, theological matters are

to

be treated in the same way as philosophical.

*The Vatican Holocaust: by Avro Mahattan published by Ozark Books,



-2-



9. All dogmas, without exception, of the Christian religion is
the subject of natural science or philosophy. Human reason can in the

course

in time be so developed that by its natural force and the principles it

can

attain all knowledge, even the profound, provided that these dogmas have
been submitted to reason as a subject. The Church not only must never

pass judgment on philosophy but must tolerate its errors and leave it to
correct them itself.

10. Since the philosopher is one thing and the philosophy
another, the former has the right and the duty to submit to authority

which

he believes to be sound, but philosophy neither can nor ought to bow to
authority.

11. The Church not only must never pass judgment on philosophy but must
tolerate its errors and leave it to correct them itself.

12. The decrees of the apostolic see and the Roman congregations are an
impediment to the free advances of science.

13. The methods and the principles, which the older scholastic
doctors used in studying theology, are not in the least in harmony with

the

needs of our time and the progress of the sciences

14. Philosophy must be studied without any regard to

supernatural

revelation.

15. Every man is free to adopt and profess any religion which under the
guidance of reason he believes to be true

18. Protestantism is only another form of the one true Christian religion,
and God is just as pleased for men to join it as to join the Catholic
Church.

20. Ecclesiastical authority must not use its powers without the

permission

and consent of the civil government.

21. The church has no power to lay down dogmatically that the religion of
the Catholic Church is the one true church

24. The church has no power to use force or any temporal power, direct or
indirect



27. The sacred ministry of the church and the Roman pontiff must be

entirely

without the permission of the government.

28. Bishops cannot be allowed to publish even the pope's

letters

without the permission

of the government

3.





30. The immunity of the church and of Ecclesiastical persons has its
origin in civil law.

31. The Ecclesiastical court for hearing secular charges must be
entirely abolished,

without consulting or even against the protest of the Apostolic see.

34. The idea that the Roman pontiff may be compared to a free prince
acting in the universal church is medieval.

37. It is lawful to establish national churches that are not subject
to the authority of the Roman pontiff and are, in fact, entirely

separated.


39. A republic, as the origin and power of all rights, has an
unlimited power.

40. The teaching of the Catholic Church is opposed to the welfare of
human society.

42. In a conflict of law between two powers the civil takes
precedence.

55. The church must be separated from the state and the state from

the

church.

56. Moral law does not need a Devine sanction, it is not at all
necessary that human laws should conform to the law of nature or derive
their binding force from God.

58. No forces are to be recognized which are not inherent in matter,
and all moral

and decent effort ought to be expended in accumulating wealth and
procuring pleasure in

any way.

59. Right consist of a material fact, "Duties of Man" is an empty
phrase, and all

man's acts have the force of right.

62. The principle of non-intervention is to be recommended and
observed.

63. It is lawful to refuse to obey and even rebel against legitimate
princes.

74. Matrimonial and Espousal cases belong by their very nature to

the

civil courts.



80. The Roman pontiff can and ought to be reconciled and come to

terms

with

progress, liberalism, and modern civilization.

To these theologians add these which are, they say, condemned in the
bull itself; (1) that the highest public interest and the progress of
society emphatically demand that human society be constituted and governed
without any regard for religion, as if there were no such thing.







Page 4 below











Page 4.




I want to remind you these are concepts the Catholic Church

condemns.

(3) That freedom of conscience and religion are the right of every man,

and

it ought to be decreed by law in every properly-constituted society that

all

citizens have the right to all freedom without the coercion of either

Civil

or Ecclesiastical authority so that they may publicly declare their

opinions

either vocally or in print or in any other way. (4) That the will of the
people, made known either by public opinion or in any other way, is the
supreme law, apart from any divine or human right, and that in

the political order accomplished facts have, by the very fact that
they are accomplished, the force of law. (8) That the clergy, being

hostile

to true and useful science and the advance of civilization, must be

excluded

from all share in the training and education of the young.

If this syllabus was read by 10,000 Catholics on the street and told
they were Fascist or Communistic and they would be expected to embrace

them

would provoke indignation and soundly reject them as being undemocratic
unaware these are

the credos their religion (Catholicism) demands their parishioners

to

accept.

END





















.

User: "*nemo*"

Title: Re: Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of Their Own 24 Sep 2004 04:53:17 AM
In article <F1N4d.29380$YU2.16374@twister.socal.rr.com>,
"New10." <drnjoseph@socal.rr.com> wrote:

Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of Their Own

An essay about Dubya? {;-)
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
User: "Tukla Ratte"

Title: Re: Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of TheirOwn 24 Sep 2004 08:42:40 AM
*nemo* wrote:

In article <F1N4d.29380$YU2.16374@twister.socal.rr.com>,
"New10." <drnjoseph@socal.rr.com> wrote:


Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of Their Own



An essay about Dubya? {;-)

I thought he was talking about Ashcroft.
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of Their Own 24 Sep 2004 08:20:08 PM
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:42:40 -0500, Tukla Ratte
<tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:

*nemo* wrote:

In article <F1N4d.29380$YU2.16374@twister.socal.rr.com>,
"New10." <drnjoseph@socal.rr.com> wrote:


Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of Their Own



An essay about Dubya? {;-)


I thought he was talking about Ashcroft.

Same thing.
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of Their Own
Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of Their Own
Criticism of Religions is Not Free Speech: Don't Abuse your Free Speech Rights by Offending Religious BelieversBelievers insist that they and their religion should be respected and, therefore, that attacks on religion are not a valid use of one's fre
OT: They did it their way - so they have no one to blame but themselves
Hate groups; how do they use the "good book" to justify their actions?
What do 'gay parents' tell their kids when they ask...
OT: Knowing Their Politics by the Software They Use
978th GI Killed by Bush's Big Lie (When Will They Get Their Purple Heart Band Aids?)
979th GI Killed by Bush's Big Lie (When Will They Get Their Purple Heart Band Aids?)
Excerpt from JCSM Watch detailing why free debate is impossible, and they can only function while stifling fair comments about their methods, and yet they presume to censure Christian providers....
I'll Send Aid to The Hurricane Victims If they Renounce Their Christianty and Convert to Atheism!
THEY FORGOT ABOUT their BLACK PREACHERS.... AND their BLACK BIBLES!!
Societies Worse Off When 'They Have God On Their Side'
Societies worse off 'when they have God on their side'
Study shows Societies worse off 'when they have God on their side'
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER