Hitler *is* a Mormon.



 Religions > Atheism > Hitler *is* a Mormon.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!"
Date: 09 Apr 2005 10:37:21 PM
Object: Hitler *is* a Mormon.
This is just too funny. one religion getting upset about
another religion's made-up rituals that the first doesn't
believe in.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=519&ncid=519&e=65&u=/ap/20050408/ap_on_re_us/baptizing_the_dead
Thu Apr 7,10:35 PM ET U.S. National - AP
By MARK THIESSEN, Associated Press Writer
SALT LAKE CITY - Jewish leaders claim Mormons continue to posthumously
baptize Jews and Holocaust victims, and will confront church leaders
with a decade of frustration over what they call broken promises.
"We have proof, and we are bringing that," said Ernest Michel, chairman
of the New York-based World Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors.
The Mormon church has long collected names from government documents
and other records worldwide for posthumous baptisms. Church members
stand in for the deceased non-Mormons, a ritual the church says is
required for the dead to reach heaven. The church believes individuals'
ability to choose a religion continues beyond the grave.
[ROTFL]
Michel plans to show posthumous baptism records to church officials
in meetings Sunday and Monday. He says the records prove tens of
thousands of Jews, including some who died in Nazi concentration
camps, were posthumously baptized over the past 10 years and as
recently as last month.
A 1995 agreement signed by Jewish leaders and The Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints called for an immediate halt to
unwanted proxy baptisms. After evidence was found in the church's
massive International Genealogical Index that the baptisms for many
Jews - including Anne Frank - continued, the two faiths reaffirmed t
he agreement in 2002.
Jewish leaders in New York have bitterly complained the baptisms
never stopped,
[ROTFL.]
and last year asked Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton
to intervene. She met with Sen. Orrin Hatch (news, bio, voting record),
an Utah Republican and active Mormon, though neither side would
discuss what was said.
The church, too, declined comment Thursday. "The church won't be
commenting at all on this issue for the moment. We are looking
forward to discussions with our Jewish guests," spokeswoman Kim
Farah said.
Under the Mormon practice, most Catholic popes have been proxy
baptized, as have historical figures like Ghengis Khan, Joan of
Arc, Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Buddha, according to Helen
Radkey, an independent genealogical researcher in Salt Lake City.
[Wow! Hitler is now a Mormon!]
However, the church directed its members after 1995 to not
include for baptism the names of Jewish Holocaust victims,
celebrities and people who aren't relatives.
The church also assumes the closest living relative of the
deceased being offered for proxy baptism has consented.
Carol Skydell, also a researcher, said that didn't happen when
her paternal grandparents and aunt and uncle apparently were
given a baptism by proxy. She found their proxy baptism records in 2002.
"Nobody asked me, nobody asked my cousin. It's ridiculous,"
Skydell said.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Unbelievable. It's just too funny. Don't they see that
how highlights that religion is just childish superstition?
More of this should happen. It would make more
atheists.
--
rb #2187
.

User: "MrPepper11"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 09 Apr 2005 11:48:07 PM
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:

This is just too funny. one religion getting upset about
another religion's made-up rituals that the first doesn't
believe in.



http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=519&ncid=519&e=65&u=/ap/20050408/ap_on_re_us/baptizing_the_dead


Thu Apr 7,10:35 PM ET U.S. National - AP


By MARK THIESSEN, Associated Press Writer

SALT LAKE CITY - Jewish leaders claim Mormons continue to

posthumously

baptize Jews and Holocaust victims, and will confront church leaders
with a decade of frustration over what they call broken promises.



"We have proof, and we are bringing that," said Ernest Michel,

chairman

of the New York-based World Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors.


The Mormon church has long collected names from government documents
and other records worldwide for posthumous baptisms. Church members
stand in for the deceased non-Mormons, a ritual the church says is
required for the dead to reach heaven. The church believes

individuals'

ability to choose a religion continues beyond the grave.
[ROTFL]


Michel plans to show posthumous baptism records to church officials
in meetings Sunday and Monday. He says the records prove tens of
thousands of Jews, including some who died in Nazi concentration
camps, were posthumously baptized over the past 10 years and as
recently as last month.


A 1995 agreement signed by Jewish leaders and The Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints called for an immediate halt to
unwanted proxy baptisms. After evidence was found in the church's
massive International Genealogical Index that the baptisms for many
Jews - including Anne Frank - continued, the two faiths reaffirmed t
he agreement in 2002.


Jewish leaders in New York have bitterly complained the baptisms
never stopped,
[ROTFL.]
and last year asked Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton
to intervene. She met with Sen. Orrin Hatch (news, bio, voting

record),

an Utah Republican and active Mormon, though neither side would
discuss what was said.


The church, too, declined comment Thursday. "The church won't be
commenting at all on this issue for the moment. We are looking
forward to discussions with our Jewish guests," spokeswoman Kim
Farah said.


Under the Mormon practice, most Catholic popes have been proxy
baptized, as have historical figures like Ghengis Khan, Joan of
Arc, Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Buddha, according to Helen
Radkey, an independent genealogical researcher in Salt Lake City.

[Wow! Hitler is now a Mormon!]


However, the church directed its members after 1995 to not
include for baptism the names of Jewish Holocaust victims,
celebrities and people who aren't relatives.


The church also assumes the closest living relative of the
deceased being offered for proxy baptism has consented.


Carol Skydell, also a researcher, said that didn't happen when
her paternal grandparents and aunt and uncle apparently were
given a baptism by proxy. She found their proxy baptism records in

2002.



"Nobody asked me, nobody asked my cousin. It's ridiculous,"
Skydell said.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Unbelievable. It's just too funny. Don't they see that
how highlights that religion is just childish superstition?
More of this should happen. It would make more
atheists.

--
rb #2187

Coming soon: An opt-out program so people can avoid being baptized
against their will - when they're DEAD.
.
User: "Faint Peter"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 10 Apr 2005 08:29:24 AM
In article <1113090487.520048.232790@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
MrPepper11 <MrPepper11@go.com> wrote:


Unbelievable. It's just too funny. Don't they see that
how highlights that religion is just childish superstition?
More of this should happen. It would make more
atheists.

--
rb #2187


Coming soon: An opt-out program so people can avoid being baptized
against their will - when they're DEAD.

Then the Rabbis will just have to invent a ceremony to DEbaptise them!
Then it'll be the Mormon's turn again. And so on.
Isn't in incredible that there are humans - intelligent enough to pull
up their own underwear - who take this seriously?
.
User: "Frank J Warner"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 10 Apr 2005 02:44:59 PM
In article <100420051829230502%rocks@head.nut>, Faint Peter
<rocks@head.nut> wrote:

In article <1113090487.520048.232790@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
MrPepper11 <MrPepper11@go.com> wrote:


Unbelievable. It's just too funny. Don't they see that
how highlights that religion is just childish superstition?
More of this should happen. It would make more
atheists.

--
rb #2187


Coming soon: An opt-out program so people can avoid being baptized
against their will - when they're DEAD.


Then the Rabbis will just have to invent a ceremony to DEbaptise them!
Then it'll be the Mormon's turn again. And so on.

Isn't in incredible that there are humans - intelligent enough to pull
up their own underwear - who take this seriously?

These are Mormons. They are directed by God to wear special underwear.
-Frank
--
Here's some of my work:
http://www.franksknives.com
.



User: "Ash"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 10 Apr 2005 11:48:48 AM
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:

This is just too funny. one religion getting upset about
another religion's made-up rituals that the first doesn't
believe in.

snip mormons baptising the dead
I'm not sure what is more idiotic, doing it or complaining about it
.
User: "Walter Bushell"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 11 Apr 2005 04:36:32 PM
In article <d3b3qr$5fk$2@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk>,
Ash <ashamanic@winterfell73.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:

Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:

This is just too funny. one religion getting upset about
another religion's made-up rituals that the first doesn't
believe in.

snip mormons baptising the dead
I'm not sure what is more idiotic, doing it or complaining about it

Given Jewish history, where the Christians used baptism as a method of
persecution.
--
Guns don't kill people; automobiles kill people.
.
User: "Walter Bushell"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 22 Apr 2005 03:39:55 PM
Re; Thread Title.
I would not be surprised if someone had baptised Hitler into the Mormon
faith.
--
Guns don't kill people; automobiles kill people.
.
User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 22 Apr 2005 07:14:43 PM
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:39:55 -0400, Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following

Re; Thread Title.

I would not be surprised if someone had baptised Hitler into the Mormon
faith.

He is. Along with Stalin, Pol Pot and other famous people.
That's one of the reasons why Mormons who come to my door at met with
a loaded shotgun and orders to depart with all due haste.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 22 Apr 2005 08:01:19 PM
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:h7ji615c588ur3k08c3e7qdojb4bh3lifb@4ax.com...

On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:39:55 -0400, Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following

Re; Thread Title.

I would not be surprised if someone had baptised Hitler into the Mormon
faith.


He is. Along with Stalin, Pol Pot and other famous people.

That's one of the reasons why Mormons who come to my door at met with
a loaded shotgun and orders to depart with all due haste.

Hitler is. One of his relatives did it.
Neither Stalin nor Pol Pot are.
Not that it matters one way or another, but it helps to be accurate. After
all, if Mormons are all that horrific, the truth alone should suffice, yes?
You shouldn't have to invent stuff. In fact, it should cause you to think
for a second; if you MUST invent things in order to sufficiently discredit
the opposition, then are you not more dishonest than they?
.
User: "Elroy Willis"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 22 Apr 2005 08:32:17 PM
DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in alt.atheism

Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message

Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> drained his beer and drunkenly proclaimed

Re; Thread Title.
I would not be surprised if someone had baptised Hitler into the Mormon
faith.

He is. Along with Stalin, Pol Pot and other famous people.
That's one of the reasons why Mormons who come to my door at met with
a loaded shotgun and orders to depart with all due haste.

Hitler is. One of his relatives did it.
Neither Stalin nor Pol Pot are.

Why not? What's the problem?
--
Elroy Willis
www.elroysemporium.com
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 02:05:23 AM
"Elroy Willis" <elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:loni61h1oo0kl31e7stk7nob8h956020l2@4ax.com...

DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in alt.atheism

Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message

Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> drained his beer and drunkenly
proclaimed


Re; Thread Title.


I would not be surprised if someone had baptised Hitler into the Mormon
faith.


He is. Along with Stalin, Pol Pot and other famous people.


That's one of the reasons why Mormons who come to my door at met with
a loaded shotgun and orders to depart with all due haste.


Hitler is. One of his relatives did it.


Neither Stalin nor Pol Pot are.


Why not? What's the problem?

No Mormon relatives, as far as I know.
And as it turns out, the one who got HITLER baptized just turned in his
family tree; the man just happened to be in the middle of a very long list.
Ah well, consider it 'coals of fire' and forget it. It's not like the
baptism would change anything. See, that's the problem with you people; you
think that being baptized by proxy actually forces the baptize to convert or
do something. This is hilarious from atheists, and it's just as funny from
those who are theists but not LDS. They get all upset because we do
something that they believe A: doesn't work, B: will get US sent to hell and
C: that the people involved don't even have a clue that anything was done.
I mean, the only way a proxy baptism could affect anybody was if we were
RIGHT, yes? (shaking head) The whole reaction to it is stupid.
.
User: "Elroy Willis"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 01:01:56 PM
DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in alt.atheism

Elroy Willis <elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote in message

DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in alt.atheism

<snip>

Hitler is. One of his relatives did it.
Neither Stalin nor Pol Pot are.

Why not? What's the problem?

No Mormon relatives, as far as I know.
And as it turns out, the one who got HITLER baptized just turned in his
family tree; the man just happened to be in the middle of a very long list.
Ah well, consider it 'coals of fire' and forget it. It's not like the
baptism would change anything. See, that's the problem with you people;
you think that being baptized by proxy actually forces the baptize to convert
or do something.

I don't think that at all. I think Hitler and Stalin and Pol Pot are
dead as doornails, just like Jesus, and can't do anything at all.

This is hilarious from atheists, and it's just as funny from
those who are theists but not LDS. They get all upset because we do
something that they believe A: doesn't work, B: will get US sent to hell and
C: that the people involved don't even have a clue that anything was done.
I mean, the only way a proxy baptism could affect anybody was if we were
RIGHT, yes? (shaking head) The whole reaction to it is stupid.

The actual ritual of proxy baptism is stupid in the first place.
Maybe it'll go away some day and people can spend that time
on more important things, eh?
--
Elroy Willis
www.elroysemporium.com
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 05:01:45 PM
"Elroy Willis" <elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:r9hk61h1am6mnvab9799gq935g752c1gm9@4ax.com...

DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in alt.atheism

<snip to>

I mean, the only way a proxy baptism could affect anybody was if we were
RIGHT, yes? (shaking head) The whole reaction to it is stupid.


The actual ritual of proxy baptism is stupid in the first place.

So is bowling. But it makes people happy.

Maybe it'll go away some day and people can spend that time
on more important things, eh?

Maybe...or maybe not. (shrug)
.

User: "Christopher A. Lee"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 01:13:22 PM
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 13:01:56 GMT, Elroy Willis
<elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote:

DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in alt.atheism

Elroy Willis <elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote in message

DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in alt.atheism


<snip>

Hitler is. One of his relatives did it.


Neither Stalin nor Pol Pot are.


Why not? What's the problem?


No Mormon relatives, as far as I know.


And as it turns out, the one who got HITLER baptized just turned in his
family tree; the man just happened to be in the middle of a very long list.


Ah well, consider it 'coals of fire' and forget it. It's not like the
baptism would change anything. See, that's the problem with you people;
you think that being baptized by proxy actually forces the baptize to convert
or do something.


I don't think that at all. I think Hitler and Stalin and Pol Pot are
dead as doornails, just like Jesus, and can't do anything at all.

This is hilarious from atheists, and it's just as funny from
those who are theists but not LDS. They get all upset because we do
something that they believe A: doesn't work, B: will get US sent to hell and
C: that the people involved don't even have a clue that anything was done.

Yet more deliberately nasty misrepresentation of atheists from the
moronic moromon.

I mean, the only way a proxy baptism could affect anybody was if we were
RIGHT, yes? (shaking head) The whole reaction to it is stupid.

What part of IT IS EXTREMELY DISRESPECTFUL is she pretending not to
understand?
But then she imagines atheists have no rights at all when it comes to
the imposition of religion.

The actual ritual of proxy baptism is stupid in the first place.
Maybe it'll go away some day and people can spend that time
on more important things, eh?

It is inconsiderate and rude to the deceased's survivors.
.
User: "Elroy Willis"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 01:31:50 PM
Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote in alt.atheism

Elroy Willis <elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote:

DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in alt.atheism

This is hilarious from atheists, and it's just as funny from those who
are theists but not LDS. They get all upset because we do something
that they believe A: doesn't work, B: will get US sent to hell and C: that
the people involved don't even have a clue that anything was done.

Yet more deliberately nasty misrepresentation of atheists from the
moronic moromon.

You seem to be upset by the whole proxy baptism thing, so how did
she misrepresent you?
Personally I couldn't care less if her cult wants to pretend to
baptise me, or if some other cult wants to stick pins into some voodoo
doll and pretend to banish me to hell. It doesn't affect me at all,
since I don't believe in such superstitious rubbish.

I mean, the only way a proxy baptism could affect anybody was if
we were RIGHT, yes? (shaking head) The whole reaction to it is stupid.

What part of IT IS EXTREMELY DISRESPECTFUL is she pretending
not to understand?
But then she imagines atheists have no rights at all when it comes to
the imposition of religion.

I'd certainly like to see the mormons spending their time doing
something more useful than baptizing dead people, but I don't really
see why you're making such a big deal of it, unless you actually might
believe that their proxy baptisms actually makes you a mormon or
something...

The actual ritual of proxy baptism is stupid in the first place.
Maybe it'll go away some day and people can spend that time
on more important things, eh?

It is inconsiderate and rude to the deceased's survivors.

Only if you believe in things like voodoo, which the proxy baptism
thing is akin to. Why let it bother you since it's just another
cultic superstitious ritual which doesn't really affect you in the
end?
--
Elroy Willis
www.elroysemporium.com
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 05:08:52 PM
"Elroy Willis" <elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:roik611qpelbt7dnke06gikca4ltchtv8d@4ax.com...

Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote in alt.atheism

Elroy Willis <elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote:

DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in alt.atheism


This is hilarious from atheists, and it's just as funny from those who
are theists but not LDS. They get all upset because we do something
that they believe A: doesn't work, B: will get US sent to hell and C:
that
the people involved don't even have a clue that anything was done.


Yet more deliberately nasty misrepresentation of atheists from the
moronic moromon.


You seem to be upset by the whole proxy baptism thing, so how did
she misrepresent you?

Personally I couldn't care less if her cult wants to pretend to
baptise me, or if some other cult wants to stick pins into some voodoo
doll and pretend to banish me to hell. It doesn't affect me at all,
since I don't believe in such superstitious rubbish.

That's my point, actually; how could some religious ritual that one doesn't
believe in, performed by a person whose ideas one doesn't believe in, affect
one? Shoot, it's not as if the dead guy was being told how to vote or
anything. ;-) Leave THAT to the Democrats.

I mean, the only way a proxy baptism could affect anybody was if
we were RIGHT, yes? (shaking head) The whole reaction to it is stupid.


What part of IT IS EXTREMELY DISRESPECTFUL is she pretending
not to understand?


But then she imagines atheists have no rights at all when it comes to
the imposition of religion.


I'd certainly like to see the mormons spending their time doing
something more useful than baptizing dead people, but I don't really
see why you're making such a big deal of it, unless you actually might
believe that their proxy baptisms actually makes you a mormon or
something...

And there is the 'bingo' moment.....;-)

The actual ritual of proxy baptism is stupid in the first place.
Maybe it'll go away some day and people can spend that time
on more important things, eh?


It is inconsiderate and rude to the deceased's survivors.


Only if you believe in things like voodoo, which the proxy baptism
thing is akin to. Why let it bother you since it's just another
cultic superstitious ritual which doesn't really affect you in the
end?

Thank you SO much for the support, Elroy. (Grin)
Besides which, in the vast majority of cases, the people doing this ARE the
survivors. You know, children, siblings, cousins, descendents of some sort.
Ah well, tell you what; here I am, when I croak, feel free to make me an
honorary atheist. I'm not going to mind a bit. ;-)
.
User: "Del"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 11:22:25 PM
DianaC wrote:

"Elroy Willis" <elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:roik611qpelbt7dnke06gikca4ltchtv8d@4ax.com...

Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote in alt.atheism

Elroy Willis <elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote:

D ianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in alt.atheism


This is hilarious from atheists, and it's just as funny from

those who

are theists but not LDS. They get all upset because we do

something

that they believe A: doesn't wor k, B: will get US sent to hell

and C:

that
the people involved don't even have a clue that anything was

done.


Yet more deliberately nasty misrepresentation of atheists from the
moronic moromon.


You seem to be upset by the whole proxy baptism thing, so how did
she misrepresent you?

Personally I couldn't care less if her cult wants to pretend to
baptise me, or if some other cult wants to stick pins into some

voodoo

doll and pretend to banish me to hell. It doesn't affect me at

all,

since I don't believe in such superstitious rubbish.


That's my point, actually; how could some religious ritual that one

doesn't

believe in, performed by a person whose ideas one doesn't believe in,

affect

one?

You certainly aren't going to waste any energy trying to
find out, are you? In your self involved little world what
you don't know isn't important.

Shoot, it's not as if the dead guy was being told how to vote or
anything. ;-) Leave THAT to the Democrats.

What do democrats have to do with this subject,
other than to feed your penchant for cheap shots?


I mean, the only way a proxy baptism could affect anybody was if
we were RIGHT, yes? (shaking head) The whole reaction t o it is

stupid.


What part of IT IS EXTREMELY DISRESPECTFUL is she pretending
not to understand?


But then she imagines atheists have no rights at all when it comes

to

the imposition of religion.


I'd certainly like to see the mormons spending their time doing
something more useful than baptizing dead people, but I don't

really

see why you're making such a big deal of it, unless you actually

might

believe that their proxy baptisms actually makes you a mormon or
something...


And there is the 'bingo' moment.....;-)


The actual ritual of proxy baptism is stupid in the first place.
Maybe it'll go away some day and people can spend that time
on more important things, eh?


It i s inconsiderate and rude to the deceased's survivors.


Only if you believe in things like voodoo, which the proxy baptism
thing is akin to. Why let it bother you since it's just another
cultic superstitious ritual which doesn't really affe ct you in the
end?


Thank you SO much for the support, Elroy. (Grin)

Besides which, in the vast majority of cases, the people doing this

ARE the

survivors. You know, children, siblings, cousins, descendents of some

sort.


Ah well, tell you what; here I am, when I croak, feel free to make me

an

honorary atheist. I'm not going to mind a bit. ;-)

Atheists would, however.=20
=B5
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 24 Apr 2005 12:22:28 AM
"Del" <jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1114298545.225069.39960@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
<snip to>


That's my point, actually; how could some religious ritual that one

doesn't

believe in, performed by a person whose ideas one doesn't believe in,

affect

one?
You certainly aren't going to waste any energy trying to
find out, are you?

I just asked, didn't I?

In your self involved little world what

you don't know isn't important.

Shoot, it's not as if the dead guy was being told how to vote or
anything. ;-) Leave THAT to the Democrats.

What do democrats have to do with this subject,
other than to feed your penchant for cheap shots?

They are fun....and they DO Have a habit of controlling the decisions and
voting patterns of the loyal dead, even if the dead didn't know they were
loyal.


I mean, the only way a proxy baptism could affect anybody was if
we were RIGHT, yes? (shaking head) The whole reaction t o it is

stupid.


What part of IT IS EXTREMELY DISRESPECTFUL is she pretending
not to understand?


But then she imagines atheists have no rights at all when it comes

to

the imposition of religion.


I'd certainly like to see the mormons spending their time doing
something more useful than baptizing dead people, but I don't

really

see why you're making such a big deal of it, unless you actually

might
..> > believe that their proxy baptisms actually makes you a mormon or

something...


And there is the 'bingo' moment.....;-)



The actual ritual of proxy baptism is stupid in the first place.
Maybe it'll go away some day and people can spend that time
on more important things, eh?


It i s inconsiderate and rude to the deceased's survivors.


Only if you believe in things like voodoo, which the proxy baptism
thing is akin to. Why let it bother you since it's just another
cultic superstitious ritual which doesn't really affe ct you in the
end?


Thank you SO much for the support, Elroy. (Grin)


Besides which, in the vast majority of cases, the people doing this

ARE the

survivors. You know, children, siblings, cousins, descendents of some

sort.


Ah well, tell you what; here I am, when I croak, feel free to make me

an

honorary atheist. I'm not going to mind a bit. ;-)

Atheists would, however.
Really? All of them?
WHY?
I'm trying to see this from an atheist POV, and quite frankly, can't see
where the insult is. Let's use the atheist premise; there is no god. There
is no afterlife. When we die we die.
So we have Grandma who was an atheist. She has seven grandkids, one of whom
is a Mormon. Who puts her name in for a proxy baptism. Now, Grandma doesn't
exist any more. How is she going to be insulted? Her descendents, perhaps
half atheist and half theist, with the one Mormon...which of them has the
right to decide what paperwork Grandma may, or may not, have done? Tell me;
if atheist grandson one wanted to write a tell all book about grandma that
had her flirting with being a Shaker, would her other grandkids have a say
in whether he could? Who owns grandma?
Here's the deal. In order to do these proxy baptisms, the Mormons have to do
a great deal of research, historical and genealogical. Family trees. So what
you get is a real grounding in who your ancestors were. Whereas before you
might not have had clue one who great great grandpa was, or that he was
tended by Walt Whitman in the Civil war infirmaries, now you might. All
because one of your cousins is a Mormon who has done the research. Now your
great great granpa, who was all but forgotten, has a memory and has a story
worth knowing.
this by you is a bad thing?
No. I honestly and truly do not understand.
Because in one way I AM like you. I am in exactly your shoes, if I were
looking at a Voodoo priestess who decided to cast a spell on my great uncle
Rupert so that he would haunt someone. Since I do not BELIEVE in Voodoo, and
know that she could chant and rattle bones until she turned purple and it
wouldn't affect Rupert, why should I worry about what she does? The thing
is, I shouldn't. And I don't.
The whole thing is ludicrous, it truly is, and even more so for those who
honestly don't believe that proxy baptisms affect those for whom they are
done, either because they no longer exist or because they are firmly
entrenched in a different belief. I can actually have some empathy for those
who are irritated about those who knock on doors. That affects YOU...and
yet, you are quite aware that it is the right of those who knock on your
door to do so, just as it is your right to say no, in pretty much any manner
of language you choose. It's your choice.
But this? Look; if we are wrong, you have no quarrel; nothing we do will
affect you, your loved ones, your way of life, what THEY are, nothing. If we
are RIGHT, you still have no worries; WE believe, after all, that it is the
absolute choice of those for whom this work is done to accept it or not.
It's just the very last knock on the door. The only thig that can be said of
you in that case is that it is not WE who are issuing the insult, but you.
YOU are presuming to make the choice for your loved one, a choice he or she
should make on their own. You do not own them. You have no right to dictate
to them.
Especially if you are right and they simply do not exist any more. In fact,
in that case what you are doing pretty much amounts to pathological
behavior; you want to control a non-existant being?
This by you is logical?
I think you need a hobby.
.



User: "Christopher A. Lee"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 02:47:07 PM
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 13:31:50 GMT, Elroy Willis
<elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote:

Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote in alt.atheism

Elroy Willis <elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote:

DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in alt.atheism


This is hilarious from atheists, and it's just as funny from those who
are theists but not LDS. They get all upset because we do something
that they believe A: doesn't work, B: will get US sent to hell and C: that
the people involved don't even have a clue that anything was done.


Yet more deliberately nasty misrepresentation of atheists from the
moronic moromon.


You seem to be upset by the whole proxy baptism thing, so how did
she misrepresent you?

"This is hilarious from atheists, and it's just as funny from those
who are theists but not LDS. They get all upset because we do
something that they believe A: doesn't work, B: will get US sent to
hell and C: that the people involved don't even have a clue that
anything was done."

Personally I couldn't care less if her cult wants to pretend to
baptise me, or if some other cult wants to stick pins into some voodoo
doll and pretend to banish me to hell. It doesn't affect me at all,
since I don't believe in such superstitious rubbish.

It is _still_ arrogantly disrespectful.

I mean, the only way a proxy baptism could affect anybody was if
we were RIGHT, yes? (shaking head) The whole reaction to it is stupid.


What part of IT IS EXTREMELY DISRESPECTFUL is she pretending
not to understand?


But then she imagines atheists have no rights at all when it comes to
the imposition of religion.


I'd certainly like to see the mormons spending their time doing
something more useful than baptizing dead people, but I don't really
see why you're making such a big deal of it, unless you actually might
believe that their proxy baptisms actually makes you a mormon or
something...

Juist treat them as rudely and disrespectfully as they themselve treat
the rest of us.

The actual ritual of proxy baptism is stupid in the first place.
Maybe it'll go away some day and people can spend that time
on more important things, eh?


It is inconsiderate and rude to the deceased's survivors.


Only if you believe in things like voodoo, which the proxy baptism
thing is akin to. Why let it bother you since it's just another
cultic superstitious ritual which doesn't really affect you in the
end?

No. It is arrogant and disrespectful. Period.
.




User: "Del"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 07:10:15 AM
DianaC wrote:

"Elroy Willis" <elroywillis@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:loni61h1oo0kl31e7stk7nob8h956020l2@4ax.com...

DianaC <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in alt.atheism

Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrot e in

message

Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> drained his beer and drunkenly
proclaimed


Re; Thread Title.


I would not be surprised if someone had baptised Hitler into the

Mormon

faith.


He is. Along with Stalin, Pol Pot and other famous people.


That's one of the reasons why Mormons who come to my door at met

with

a loaded shotgun and orders to depart with all due haste.


Hitler is. One of his relatives did it.


Neither Sta lin nor Pol Pot are.


Why not? What's the problem?


No Mormon relatives, as far as I know.

And as it turns out, the one who got HITLER baptized just turned in

his

family tree; the man just happened to be in the middle of a very long

list.


Ah well, consider it 'coals of fire' and forget it. It's not like the
baptism would change anything. See, that's the problem with you

people; you

think that being baptized by proxy actually forces the baptize to

convert or

do something.

Nice try. Except it is clear that the respondents in this thread
didn't take this seriously.

This is hilarious from atheists,

"Hilarious"? Then why are you so *****? Maybe
you're still steamed about Hugh Nibley's daughter
exposing her father as a child molester?

and it's just as funny from
those who are theists but not LDS. They get all upset because we do
something that they believe A: doesn't work, B: will get US sent to

hell and

C: that the people involved don't even have a clue that anything was

done.
Gee I wonder if "you people" would mind if the American
Communist party began making dead mormons honorary
communists.


I mean, the only way a proxy baptism could affect anybody was if we

were

RIGHT, yes? (shaking head) The whole reaction to it is stupid.

What else could you say?
"When our leaders speak, _the thinking has been done_.
When they propose a plan - it is God's plan. When they
point the way, there is no other which is safe. When they
give direction, it should mark the end of controversy."
(Deseret News, Church Section, May 26, 1945, p.5)
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 05:00:22 PM
"Del" <jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1114240215.706757.209530@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...


<snip to>


Gee I wonder if "you people" would mind if the American
Communist party began making dead mormons honorary
communists.

Wouldn't worry me any, knock themselves out.
(snip to end)
.
User: "Del"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 11:14:09 PM
DianaC wrote:

"Del" <jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1114240215.706757.209530@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...


<snip to>


Gee I wonder if "you people" would mind if the American
Communist party began making dead mormons honorary
communists.


Wouldn't worry me any, knock themselves out.

Yeah, you snipped the stuff that worried you.


(snip to end)

"To end"? There were only a few more lines! It
must be second nature for you people to evade
painful truths.
"When our leaders speak, _the thinking has been done_.
When they propose a plan - it is God's plan. When they
point the way, there is no other which is safe. When they
give direction, it should mark the end of controversy."
(Deseret News, Church Section, May 26, 1945, p.5)
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 24 Apr 2005 12:01:50 AM
"Del" <jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1114298049.468188.252610@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


DianaC wrote:

"Del" <jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1114240215.706757.209530@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...


<snip to>


Gee I wonder if "you people" would mind if the American
Communist party began making dead mormons honorary
communists.


Wouldn't worry me any, knock themselves out.


Yeah, you snipped the stuff that worried you.

Nah, if it worried me I'd have commented.


(snip to end)


"To end"? There were only a few more lines! It
must be second nature for you people to evade
painful truths.

So you know I snipped 'em. I don't make a habit of replying to silliness.
.




User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 04:41:26 PM
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 02:05:23 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> drained his beer, leaned back in the
alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly proclaimed the following

I mean, the only way a proxy baptism could affect anybody was if we were
RIGHT, yes? (shaking head) The whole reaction to it is stupid.

At the end of WWII, a Captain in the US Army forwarded a list of
Jewish Holocaust victims to the LDS in Salt Lake City. Several
thousand names.
They were all baptised.
Some of my wife's relatives were on that list. They were persecuted
for being Jews, killed for being Jews, and went to the chambers as
Jews.
By what right did this man take that from them. When we (and the
other relatives) tried to get their names removed, the LDS fought us.
http://www.juf.org/news_public_affairs/article.asp?key=4744
360,000 Jews on your bloddy list. Without any permission from a
relative, without any concern for who these people were.
As far as I'm concern, the Mormoms are evil. The US Army should have
turned its guns on them in the 1880s.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 05:53:55 PM
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:g3uk61hmtif843ajhbub2uu0701b5vv1jn@4ax.com...

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 02:05:23 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> drained his beer, leaned back in the
alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly proclaimed the following

I mean, the only way a proxy baptism could affect anybody was if we were
RIGHT, yes? (shaking head) The whole reaction to it is stupid.


At the end of WWII, a Captain in the US Army forwarded a list of
Jewish Holocaust victims to the LDS in Salt Lake City. Several
thousand names.

They were all baptised.

Some of my wife's relatives were on that list. They were persecuted
for being Jews, killed for being Jews, and went to the chambers as
Jews.

By what right did this man take that from them.

And how did the actions of people you think are wrong, in doing something
you firmly believe to be ineffective, take that away from them? Good grief,
sir, even the Mormons that DID this don't believe that we removed their
Jewishness or diminished that in any way. It was certainly not done with the
intent to disparage any of those who suffered in the Holocaust, or to
diminish their 'Jewishness' or to insult their remaining family members.
Indeed, it was, though ill-advised, an attempt by those who did this to
honor those who died. Now I understand completely that YOU think it's an
insult, but really, sir, by thinking so, aren't you stealing something?
Isn't taking something not offered a form of theft? No insult was meant. At
all, by anybody.
I went to your website, and found the following quote on it: "Baptism is the
second ugliest word in the English language to a Jew," Mokotoff said. "The
first is gassed. The third is raped."
Er, over-react much?
Allow me to let you in on a little secret; Gassing and rape are done without
the consent of the victims. Baptism, without the consent of the one being
baptised, is a dunk in a pond, with no more meaning than a dunk in the pond.
In OUR beliefs, that proxy baptism is only effective if the one for whom it
is done wants it and accepts it. It is, therefore, THEIR choice. Of the two
of us, YOU are the one removing that choice from them, not us. Nothing we
have done will affect your dead, even in OUR belief system, if your loved
ones say 'no thanks'.
And you don't think it affects them at all.
What is happening here, even if you believe that what we do actually means
anything, is that missionaries are knocking at their doors. That's it. "Are
you interested? If you are, fine, if not, say so and we go away". If even
WE do not think that these baptisms mean anything if those for whom the work
is done don't actually, and actively, want it, what's YOUR beef with it?
Indeed, seems to me that if we are correct, and this stuff works, that YOU
are the one who is committing the atrocity here; YOU are removing your
relative's freedom to make their own choices. YOU are deciding for them.
Impertinent, don't you think?
If we are not correct, and nothing we do affects your loved ones one way or
another, how is this action second only to gassing? WE are not murdering
anyone, or taking their identities away, or indeed, doing anything at all to
them. Certainly we are not doing anything that takes away their freedom of
choice.
When we (and the

other relatives) tried to get their names removed, the LDS fought us.

http://www.juf.org/news_public_affairs/article.asp?key=4744

Goodie, Now would you try giving us a site that does NOT equate proxy
baptism with murder and rape? You know, something that is at least somewhere
in the real universe?


360,000 Jews on your bloddy list. Without any permission from a
relative, without any concern for who these people were.

As far as I'm concern, the Mormoms are evil. The US Army should have
turned its guns on them in the 1880s.

Well, they didn't. However, they DID do so in the 1840's and again in the
1860's. Would that do? And how interesting it is that you think murdering
US is the appropriate response to some paperwork that you don't even think
affected anybody. We didn't kill you, rape you, torture or gas you, we have
not ever hated you. If there is All we did was do something stupid. We
believed that those who died in the horrors of the war still had a right to
make their own choices, and we offered them one. That's it.
That's all.
Whether YOU want to be stupid about it or not, that's really all.
.
User: "Del"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 24 Apr 2005 12:13:09 AM
DianaC wrote:

"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:g3uk61hmtif843ajhbub2uu0701b5vv1jn@4ax.com...

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 02:05:23 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> drained his beer, leaned back in

the

alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly proclaimed the following

I mean, the only way a proxy baptism could affect anybody was if we

were

RIGHT, yes? (shaking head) The whole reaction to it is stupid.


At the end of WWII, a Captain i n the US Army forwarded a list of
Jewish Holocaust victims to the LDS in Salt Lake City. Several
thousand names.

They were all baptised.

Some of my wife's relatives were on that list. They were

persecuted

for being Jews, kill ed for being Jews, and went to the chambers as
Jews.

By what right did this man take that from them.


And how did the actions of people you think are wrong, in doing

something

you firmly believe to be ineffective, take that away from th em? Good

grief,

sir, even the Mormons that DID this don't believe that we removed

their

Jewishness or diminished that in any way. It was certainly not done

with the

intent to disparage any of those who suffered in the Holocaust, or to
diminish their 'Jewishness' or to insult their remaining family

members.

Indeed, it was, though ill-advised, an attempt by those who did this

to

honor those who died. Now I understand completely that YOU think it's

an

insult, but really, sir, by thinkin g so, aren't you stealing

something?

Isn't taking something not offered a form of theft? No insult was

meant. At

all, by anybody.

I went to your website, and found the following quote on it: "Baptism

is the

second ugliest word in the English language to a Jew," Mokotoff said.

"The

first is gassed. The third is raped."

Er, over-react much?

Hey, isn't this the Mormon position on child
molestation too?


Allow me to let you in on a little secret; Gassing and rape are done

without

the consent of the victims. Baptism, without the consent of the one

being

baptised, is a dunk in a pond, with no more meaning than a dunk in

the pond.

In OUR beliefs, that proxy baptism is only effective if the one for

whom it

is done wants it and accepts it.

That's what counts, you see. What Mormons
believe. To disagree is to be irrational or over react.
It is, therefore, THEIR choice. Of the two

of us, YOU are the one removing that choice from them, not us.

Nothing we

have done will affect your dead, even in OUR belief system, if your

loved

ones say 'no thanks'.

Unbelievable. Why do you act as if your ignorance
was a virtue? Why should they have to try to justify
their religious views to your ilk and get your
approval? They don't like it, period. For anyone
with average sensitivity that would be sufficient.


And you don't think it affects them at all.

Yes, it is so generous of Mormons to help Jews
correct the biggest mistake of their lives in being
Jewish and give them a chance to avoid hell by
becoming a member of the one true religion. Why
should their relatives mind that? How insensitive
to the feelings of Mormons!


What is happening here, eve n if you believe that what we do actually

means

anything, is that missionaries are knocking at their doors. That's

it. "Are

you interested? If you are, fine, if not, say so and we go away". If

even

WE do not think that these baptisms mean anything if those for whom

the work

is done don't actually, and actively, want it, what's YOUR beef with

it?
Yeah, justify it to Diana, damn it. If you can't--to
her satisfaction--then screw you.


Indeed, seems to me that if we are correct, and this stuff works,

that YOU

are the one who is committing the atrocity here;

And that is what is really important: what diana
thinks. We can never get very far away from that
fact of life, can we. And don't think for a minute
that her going on for multiple paragraphs is over
reacting (much).

YOU are removing your
relative's freedom to make their own choices.

You see how insensitive you are for not considering
what Diana believes? How dare you!

YOU are deciding for them.
Impertinent, don't you think?

What do you expect? He's a Jew. What do they know
about the one true religion? That's why they need
you Mormons to help them out.


If we are not correct, and nothing we do affects your loved ones one

way or

another, how is this action second only to gassing? WE ar e not

murdering

anyone, or taking their identities away, or indeed, doing anything at

all to

them. Certainly we are not doing anything that takes away their

freedom of

choice.

Geeze. Are you always this stupid or is this a
special occasion? It isn't about the dead, it is
about the living. It is about your laughably
(at this point) oblivious condescension and utter
inability to see things from anything other than
your provincial point of view. Clue: It doesn't matter
what you think. This isn't about what you think.
It should be enough that relatives are offended.
But obviously that isn't good enough for you.
Clue II: No one needs to justify their feelings to
you.
Rarely have I ever witnessed anyone as
narcissistic as you come across and that's
saying something.




When we (and the

other relatives) tried to get their na mes removed, the LDS fought

us.


http://www.juf.org/news_public_affairs/article.asp?key=4744



Goodie, Now would you try giving us a site that does NOT equate proxy
baptism with murder and rape? You know, something that is at least

somewhe re

in the real universe?

There you have it. Jews aren't justified in
their beliefs. Our resident religious expert
has decided.



360,000 Jews on your bloddy list. Without any permission from a
relative, without any concern for who these people were.

As far as I'm concern, the Mormoms are evil. The US Army should

have

turned i ts guns on them in the 1880s.


Well, they didn't. However, they DID do so in the 1840's and again in

the

1860's.

*****. However the greatest massacre of settlers
in the history of the West was perpertrated by
Mormons: the Mountain Medow Massacre. So
spare us your trumped up martyrdom.
Would that do? And how interesting it is that you think murdering

US is the appropriate response to some paperwork that you don't even

think

affected anybody. We didn't kill you, rape you, torture or gas you,

we have

not ever hated you. If there is All we did was do something stupid.

We

believed that those who died in the horrors of the war still had a

right to

make their own choices, and we offered them one. That's it.

That's all.

You poor, poor victims. I feel your pain.
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 24 Apr 2005 03:25:05 PM
"Del" <jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1114301589.670834.95130@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
<snip to>


I went to your website, and found the following quote on it: "Baptism

is the

second ugliest word in the English language to a Jew," Mokotoff said.

"The

first is gassed. The third is raped."

Er, over-react much?


Hey, isn't this the Mormon position on child
molestation too?

Is it possible to over-react to child molestation?


Allow me to let you in on a little secret; Gassing and rape are done

without

the consent of the victims. Baptism, without the consent of the one

being

baptised, is a dunk in a pond, with no more meaning than a dunk in

the pond.

In OUR beliefs, that proxy baptism is only effective if the one for

whom it

is done wants it and accepts it.


That's what counts, you see. What Mormons
believe. To disagree is to be irrational or over react.

When it comes to what we think our doctrine is, yes. That's what counts.
Baptism for the dead is OUR doctrine, it is what we say it is. Just as your
nonbelief in a deity is what you say it is. Just as Judaism is what they say
it is, just as....see where I'm going with this?
Therefore, if WE say that this baptism for the dead doesn't change them,
take away their identities, remove thier choices or alter their beings, then
it doesn't.
The only way you can argue with it is to admit that proxy baptism DOES have
an affect on those who passed on, and that it is different from what we
claim it is. Which would be admitting that this proxy baptism works. Do you
want to do that?

It is, therefore, THEIR choice. Of the two

of us, YOU are the one removing that choice from them, not us.

Nothing we

have done will affect your dead, even in OUR belief system, if your

loved

ones say 'no thanks'.


Unbelievable. Why do you act as if your ignorance
was a virtue? Why should they have to try to justify
their religious views to your ilk and get your
approval? They don't like it, period. For anyone
with average sensitivity that would be sufficient.

Oh? And if I said that I don't like seeing prayer shawls and yarmulkes on
men in the street, and I REALLY resent having to wear one if I am invited to
a synagogue, would you suddenly stop wearing prayer shawls and yarmulkes?
(disclaimer, I have absolutely no problem with prayer shawls and yarmulkes,
and anybody with a grain of sense would have seen the above as a
hypothetical situation and not figured that I did, but under the
circumstances I think I should be quite, quite clear)


And you don't think it affects them at all.


Yes, it is so generous of Mormons to help Jews
correct the biggest mistake of their lives in being
Jewish and give them a chance to avoid hell by
becoming a member of the one true religion. Why
should their relatives mind that? How insensitive
to the feelings of Mormons!

Excuse me, but do you advocate shooting people if they knock on your
relative's door? It's THEIR choice. Not yours. You do not own your
relatives.
Nor do we. We are not kidnapping them. We are not torturing them. We are not
gassing or raping or doing anything to them they can't say 'no thank you' to
and have it stick. Is it that you are afraid they might actually say 'yes'?
No, that's not it; you don't think they exist.

What is happening here, eve n if you believe that what we do actually

means

anything, is that missionaries are knocking at their doors. That's

it. "Are

you interested? If you are, fine, if not, say so and we go away". If

even

WE do not think that these baptisms mean anything if those for whom

the work

is done don't actually, and actively, want it, what's YOUR beef with

it?

Yeah, justify it to Diana, damn it. If you can't--to
her satisfaction--then screw you.

Yes, actually, you do need to justify it to me, IF you want me to really
understand your problem with it. You really do. Of course, if you dont care
whether I 'get' it or not, you don't. After all, *I* didn't perform any of
these baptisms, or submit the names. I am simply telling you that there is
no insult intended, and no result from our actions that would force your
dead to do anything they don't want to do. They don't remove their
'jewishness', they have been, and are now, and will always be the 'chosen
people'. Nothing WE do could ever change that.
Even if you believed that what we did affected your dead personally in any
way.
So no, I don't understand your problem. I really, really do not. I wouldn't
have a problem if you did the same thing for the LDS dead.

Indeed, seems to me that if we are correct, and this stuff works,

that YOU

are the one who is committing the atrocity here;


And that is what is really important: what diana
thinks. We can never get very far away from that
fact of life, can we. And don't think for a minute
that her going on for multiple paragraphs is over
reacting (much).

Fact of debate life: what matters is what the debaters think. That's the
point. Two people taking opposite sides of an issue. Trying to insult one of
them by accusing her of saying what she thinks is a little ridiculous, don't
you agree?
And OK, I write a lot of words. If you want to think that a great many words
is over-reacting to the degree your wanting to shoot people is, or to
equating what the Mormons did as worse than rape, I think that's a fairly
clear indication of which of us is the more unbalanced.


YOU are removing your
relative's freedom to make their own choices.


You see how insensitive you are for not considering
what Diana believes? How dare you!

You DO realize that you have just indicated the loss of this debate, don't
you? Not being able to counter the argument with reason, you go straight to
the ad hominem.....
Look, any act, in order to BE an insult, has to be intended for an insult.
That's a fact of human behavior. If someone gives you 'the finger' and you
are insulted....and later find out that 'the finger' was broken, splinted
and that the owner of it had no intention of insulting you, can you still
accuse the poor boob for intentially insulting you?
No reasonable person would do so.
Therefore, YES, you idiot, you DO have to consider 'what Diana believes' in
this matter, because it is what WE believe that determines whether we
intended insult!
It also helps to actually look at the act in view of what it really means,
and decide if it's reasonable to feel insulted by it.

YOU are deciding for them.
Impertinent, don't you think?


What do you expect? He's a Jew. What do they know
about the one true religion? That's why they need
you Mormons to help them out.

non sequitur....I get to say 'no thank you' to Jehovah's Witnesses and
Baptists all the time. I don't feel insulted when they come to my door...

If we are not correct, and nothing we do affects your loved ones one

way or

another, how is this action second only to gassing? WE ar e not

murdering

anyone, or taking their identities away, or indeed, doing anything at

all to

them. Certainly we are not doing anything that takes away their

freedom of

choice.


Geeze. Are you always this stupid or is this a
special occasion? It isn't about the dead, it is
about the living. It is about your laughably
(at this point) oblivious condescension and utter
inability to see things from anything other than
your provincial point of view. Clue: It doesn't matter
what you think. This isn't about what you think.
It should be enough that relatives are offended.
But obviously that isn't good enough for you.
Clue II: No one needs to justify their feelings to
you.

They do if their feelings are impacting on what I do. Or haven't you
noticed that in spite of the contentious nature of this conversation, that's
what I'm trying to do, explain what's really happening here to someone who
was insulted by it?
Trying to explain why there was no insult meant? And pointing out that OUR
freedom of religion does NOT harm him in any way?


Rarely have I ever witnessed anyone as
narcissistic as you come across and that's
saying something.




When we (and the

other relatives) tried to get their na mes removed, the LDS fought

us.


http://www.juf.org/news_public_affairs/article.asp?key=4744



Goodie, Now would you try giving us a site that does NOT equate proxy


baptism with murder and rape? You know, something that is at least

somewhe re

in the real universe?


There you have it. Jews aren't justified in
their beliefs. Our resident religious expert
has decided.



360,000 Jews on your bloddy list. Without any permission from a
relative, without any concern for who these people were.

As far as I'm concern, the Mormoms are evil. The US Army should

have

turned i ts guns on them in the 1880s.


Well, they didn't. However, they DID do so in the 1840's and again in

the

1860's.


*****. However the greatest massacre of settlers
in the history of the West was perpertrated by
Mormons: the Mountain Medow Massacre. So
spare us your trumped up martyrdom.


Would that do? And how interesting it is that you think murdering

US is the appropriate response to some paperwork that you don't even

think

affected anybody. We didn't kill you, rape you, torture or gas you,

we have

not ever hated you. If there is All we did was do something stupid.

We

believed that those who died in the horrors of the war still had a

right to

make their own choices, and we offered them one. That's it.

That's all.


You poor, poor victims. I feel your pain.

.


User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 23 Apr 2005 11:42:07 PM
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 17:53:55 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> drained his beer, leaned back in the
alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly proclaimed the following

And how did the actions of people you think are wrong, in doing something
you firmly believe to be ineffective, take that away from them? Good grief,
sir, even the Mormons that DID this don't believe that we removed their
Jewishness or diminished that in any way. It was certainly not done with the
intent to disparage any of those who suffered in the Holocaust, or to
diminish their 'Jewishness' or to insult their remaining family members.
Indeed, it was, though ill-advised, an attempt by those who did this to
honor those who died. Now I understand completely that YOU think it's an
insult, but really, sir, by thinking so, aren't you stealing something?
Isn't taking something not offered a form of theft? No insult was meant. At
all, by anybody.

They believed, and they were not given a choice! Do you not
understand why this is wrong? Religion is supposed to be a personal
thing, and you Mormon monsters take that away!
Do you have any concept about Jewish history? Do you understand in
the slightest what this act of your church meant?
Moromons accept Jesus as the Messiah. Jews don't. How the ***** can
you claim that entering deceased Jews into the Mormon rolls doesn't
take away their identities? In 500 years, what will someone looking
at the geneologies think?

I went to your website, and found the following quote on it: "Baptism is the
second ugliest word in the English language to a Jew," Mokotoff said. "The
first is gassed. The third is raped."

Not my website, idiot. I linked to it.

Er, over-react much?

Have 4-6 million of your people murdered and see how you feel.

Allow me to let you in on a little secret; Gassing and rape are done without
the consent of the victims. Baptism, without the consent of the one being
baptised, is a dunk in a pond, with no more meaning than a dunk in the pond.
In OUR beliefs, that proxy baptism is only effective if the one for whom it
is done wants it and accepts it. It is, therefore, THEIR choice. Of the two
of us, YOU are the one removing that choice from them, not us. Nothing we
have done will affect your dead, even in OUR belief system, if your loved
ones say 'no thanks'.

So, why hasn't the LDS removed the 360,000 names of the Jews from
their rolls? Why is Hitler still on there? Are you trying to tell me
that they all consented?

And you don't think it affects them at all.

It's about personal respect, damnit! The LDS had no right, no right
at all, to put names on their rolls unless that person has requested
it!

What is happening here, even if you believe that what we do actually means
anything, is that missionaries are knocking at their doors. That's it. "Are
you interested? If you are, fine, if not, say so and we go away". If even
WE do not think that these baptisms mean anything if those for whom the work
is done don't actually, and actively, want it, what's YOUR beef with it?

So, again, why were over 360,000 Jews, who died in the Shoah, added to
the rolls? Why is Hitler there? Did they convert, or were they just
added by the LDS in order to inflate their numbers.

Indeed, seems to me that if we are correct, and this stuff works, that YOU
are the one who is committing the atrocity here; YOU are removing your
relative's freedom to make their own choices. YOU are deciding for them.
Impertinent, don't you think?

My wife's relatives are *dead* and haven't been able to make decisions
since the moment they all died. I'm sorry you don't understand the
difference between "alive" and "dead." But I've found this common in
Christian Zombies.

If we are not correct, and nothing we do affects your loved ones one way or
another, how is this action second only to gassing? WE are not murdering
anyone, or taking their identities away, or indeed, doing anything at all to
them. Certainly we are not doing anything that takes away their freedom of
choice.

Do you have any respect at all for people's rights? Or is everything
the LDS does alright with you? Your church added hundreds of
thousands of people to their rolls without consent from anyone.
People who died for being Jewsih, but now you say they're Mormons?
***** that!

When we (and the

other relatives) tried to get their names removed, the LDS fought us.

http://www.juf.org/news_public_affairs/article.asp?key=4744



Goodie, Now would you try giving us a site that does NOT equate proxy
baptism with murder and rape? You know, something that is at least somewhere
in the real universe?

Would you prefer identity theft? It is disgusting, and you LDS Morons
refuse to admit you did anything wrong.

360,000 Jews on your bloddy list. Without any permission from a
relative, without any concern for who these people were.

As far as I'm concern, the Mormoms are evil. The US Army should have
turned its guns on them in the 1880s.


Well, they didn't. However, they DID do so in the 1840's and again in the
1860's. Would that do? And how interesting it is that you think murdering
US is the appropriate response to some paperwork that you don't even think
affected anybody. We didn't kill you, rape you, torture or gas you, we have
not ever hated you. If there is All we did was do something stupid. We
believed that those who died in the horrors of the war still had a right to
make their own choices, and we offered them one. That's it.

HOW IN THE HELL DO YOU OFFER A CHOICE TO DEAD PEOPLE?

That's all.

Whether YOU want to be stupid about it or not, that's really all.

I'm not the morbid creep who thinks the dead are making choices.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: Hitler *is* a Mormon. 24 Apr 2005 01:00:24 AM
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:hlml61db6iqigao264jthcooebv48oglnf@4ax.com...

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 17:53:55 GMT, "DianaC"
<dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> drained his beer, leaned back in the
alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly proclaimed the following

And how did the actions of people you think are wrong, in doing something
you firmly believe to be ineffective, take that away from them? Good
grief,
sir, even the Mormons that DID this don't believe that we removed their
Jewishness or diminished that in any way. It was certainly not done with
the
intent to disparage any of those who suffered in the Holocaust, or to
diminish their 'Jewishness' or to insult their remaining family members.
Indeed, it was, though ill-advised, an attempt by those who did this to
honor those who died. Now I understand completely that YOU think it's an
insult, but really, sir, by thinking so, aren't you stealing something?
Isn't taking something not offered a form of theft? No insult was meant.
At
all, by anybody.


They believed, and they were not given a choice! Do you not
understand why this is wrong? Religion is supposed to be a personal
thing, and you Mormon monsters take that away!

Ah, but that's the point. THEY WERE given a choice. REmember, WE are the
ones who believe in this, and the most important part OF that belief is that
those for whom the work is done ABSOLUTELY have the choice to accept or
reject it. They are under no obligation at all to accept it. None. Indeed,
the person removing their choice is you. You are making the choice for them.
We were not.

Do you have any concept about Jewish history? Do you understand in
the slightest what this act of your church meant?

Moromons accept Jesus as the Messiah. Jews don't. How the ***** can
you claim that entering deceased Jews into the Mormon rolls doesn't
take away their identities? In 500 years, what will someone looking
at the geneologies think?

You really are insane. Nothing we did took their identities as Jews away
from them. They lived Jewish, they died Jewish. The genealogies will say
that. Oh, and which genealogies are you referring to? YOURS? Where would an
LDS proxy baptism show up on YOUR genealogies? On the other hand, if the
only genealogies that exist are OURS, then the only way you are going to
even know who these people were, and that they were very much Jewish, is
because we cared enough to do them. Say 'thank you'. Either way, your point
is assinine.

I went to your website, and found the following quote on it: "Baptism is
the
second ugliest word in the English language to a Jew," Mokotoff said. "The
first is gassed. The third is raped."


Not my website, idiot. I linked to it.

You used it as a proof text. Therefore you are responsible for it. If you
don't like it, find another one.


Er, over-react much?


Have 4-6 million of your people murdered and see how you feel.

We didn't murder them.

Allow me to let you in on a little secret; Gassing and rape are done
without
the consent of the victims. Baptism, without the consent of the one being
baptised, is a dunk in a pond, with no more meaning than a dunk in the
pond.
In OUR beliefs, that proxy baptism is only effective if the one for whom
it
is done wants it and accepts it. It is, therefore, THEIR choice. Of the
two
of us, YOU are the one removing that choice from them, not us. Nothing we
have done will affect your dead, even in OUR belief system, if your loved
ones say 'no thanks'.


So, why hasn't the LDS removed the 360,000 names of the Jews from
their rolls? Why is Hitler still on there? Are you trying to tell me
that they all consented?

Why should we? It doesn't affect them unless they want it to.
Hitler is on there because some stupid relative put him there. Is THAT what
has the burr up your butt? That HITLER is on the list? Well, the hope is
that eventually everybody will be on the list. As to Hitler, are you willing
to accept that since this is OUR doctrine and practice, that what WE think