| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Jim Warren" |
| Date: |
21 Apr 2004 09:51:54 AM |
| Object: |
Hitler/Stalin question |
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians
killed 100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse
gods. I disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and
effort looking for the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of
the covenant, which would have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a
Christian?
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week.
Was Stalin an atheist?
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed
into heaven according to the bible?
.
|
|
| User: "Bob Dog" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
22 Apr 2004 02:55:40 AM |
|
|
Jim Warren <jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu> wrote in message news:<792d801v28lgorunv6db7kjvd5qfa4p6h9@4ax.com>...
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians
killed 100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
Only if you consider the others they killed (the Moors,
the native North Americans and Australians, the Africans,
etc.) not to be human. If, as I suspect, you do consider
them human, then the count goes up to the tens or hundreds
of millions. But given the website in question, I would
suspect they *don't* consider the aforementioned groups to
be human.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse
gods. I disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and
effort looking for the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of
the covenant, which would have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a
Christian?
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week.
Was Stalin an atheist?
Every atrocity has been committed by the same mentality,
regardless of religion (or lack thereof) or ideology: the
notion that "We're right, you're wrong, and that gives us
the right to kill you". Only extremist ideologies have
ever committed atrocities, be they nazism, xianity, islam,
communism, or whatever.
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed
into heaven according to the bible?
It depends on your brand of xianity. Some say selling your
soul to "god" is enough (eg. fundies, protestants), others
say what you do plus believing buys you a ticket, and others
(the few decent xians) say what gets you in is solely how
you treat others.
Bob Dog
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
21 Apr 2004 08:31:47 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:51:54 -0400 in episode
<792d801v28lgorunv6db7kjvd5qfa4p6h9@4ax.com> we saw our hero Jim Warren
<jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu>:
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians killed
100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
Oh, well, *that's okay...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
23 Apr 2004 04:08:33 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:31:47 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo" <y@hoo.com-amikchi>,
Message ID: <pan.2004.04.22.01.31.46.539786@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote in
alt.atheism;
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:51:54 -0400 in episode
<792d801v28lgorunv6db7kjvd5qfa4p6h9@4ax.com> we saw our hero Jim Warren
<jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu>:
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians killed
100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
Oh, well, *that's okay...
Of course!.... damned idiots.....
Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Warren" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
25 Apr 2004 08:05:01 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:51:54 -0400, Jim Warren
<jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians
killed 100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse
gods. I disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and
effort looking for the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of
the covenant, which would have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a
Christian?
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week.
Was Stalin an atheist?
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed
into heaven according to the bible?
I did a google search on Hilter Catholic and was surprised at how
religious lieber dolf was. Here are some pictures.
http://www.nobeliefs.com/nazis.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
25 Apr 2004 09:01:19 AM |
|
|
"Jim Warren" <jmwarren@msu.edu> wrote in message
news:6qdn80d8dj37pn6rjtkhof4809rampjptr@4ax.com...
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:51:54 -0400, Jim Warren
<jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week.
Was Stalin an atheist?
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed
into heaven according to the bible?
I did a google search on Hilter Catholic and was surprised at how
religious lieber dolf was. Here are some pictures.
http://www.nobeliefs.com/nazis.htm
Mmm that hardly looks like the behaviour of an atheist !
Thanks for that.
--
Jez
"The condition of alienation, of being asleep, of being unconscious,
of being out of one's mind, is the condition of the normal man. Society
highly values its normal man.It educates children to lose themselves
and to become absurd,and thus to be normal. Normal men have killed
perhaps 100,000,000 of their fellow normal men in the last fifty years."
R.D. Laing
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Warren" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
25 Apr 2004 03:03:53 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:51:54 -0400, Jim Warren
<jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians
killed 100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse
gods. I disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and
effort looking for the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of
the covenant, which would have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a
Christian?
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week.
Was Stalin an atheist?
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed
into heaven according to the bible?
Here is an interesting quote from Adolf Hitler (lieber Dolf to the
xian community.)
“My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a
fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded
only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and
summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest
not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian
and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at
last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the
Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was his fight
against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with
deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact
that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross. As
a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have
the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice. And as a man I have
the duty to see to it that human society does not suffer the same
catastrophic collapse as did the civilization of the ancient world
some two thousand years ago — a civilization which was driven to its
ruin through this same Jewish people.
“Then indeed when Rome collapsed there were endless streams of new
German bands flowing into the Empire from the North; but, if Germany
collapses today, who is there to come after us? German blood upon this
earth is on the way to gradual exhaustion unless we pull ourselves
together and make ourselves free!
“And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting
rightly, it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I
have also a duty to my own people. And when I look on my people I see
them work and work and toil and labor, and at the end of the week they
have only for their wages wretchedness and misery. When I go out in
the morning and see these men standing in their queues and look into
their pinched faces, then I believe I would be no Christian, but a
very devil, if I felt no pity for them, if I did not, as did our Lord
two thousand years ago, turn against those by whom today this poor
people are plundered and exploited.”
( Adolf Hitler, in a speech delivered at Munich, April 12, 1922; from
Norman H. Baynes, ed., The Speeches of Adolf Hitler: April 1922-August
1939, Vol. 1, New York: Oxford University Press, 1942, pp. 19-20. )
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
21 Apr 2004 09:55:16 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:51:54 -0400, Jim Warren
<jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians
killed 100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
10.000.000 is probably an understatement. Persecution of 'unbelievers'
(being the wrong type of christians) took a lot more. Several vicious
religious wars ravaged Europe. Persecution of witches claimed at least
a million victims. The crusades I don't even mention, nor the conquest
of America - which close to exterminated the indian population.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse
gods.
What he privately worshipped is not important. What he as head of the
German state worshipped was.
Bush is publicly a devout christian. He acts as such. His policy is
directed that way. If we in later days find out he privately
sacrificed goats to Baal in his basement, that is irrelevant.
Besides, those claiming that Hitler worshipped Norse gods should be
able to back up that assertion. I don't know of any source supporting
the claim that Hitler worshipped the Norse gods.
I disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and
effort looking for the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of
the covenant, which would have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a
Christian?
He was Roman Catholic.
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week.
Was Stalin an atheist?
Possibly. But he never persecuted in the name of atheism.
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed
into heaven according to the bible?
It all depends on which convenient quotes you select.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Samir Ribic" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
22 Apr 2004 03:00:31 AM |
|
|
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week.
Was Stalin an atheist?
It is amazing how this number is increased over the time, up the
absurdity.
* In the year 1983 I learned from school history that in Stalin's
clearings were killed about one milion of people. Keep in mind that I
lived in Yugoslavia, the country who since 1948 had no positive word
about Stalin.
* In 1990 this number I read about 10 milions of Stalin's victimes.
* In 1995 this number increased to 20 milions, maybe with wish to
equate with Hitler's victimes.
* The trend continued, so in 1999 we talked about 40 milions. Stalin
became for USSR twice worse than Hitler.
* Now, assuming 250000 per week, during 30 years of Stalin's
leadership, will give us 390 milions! Twice population of USSR of that
time? So, Stalin is guilty for all old man who died by natural death,
for trafic accidents, for people killed by Germans in war, alcohol
diseases, as well as for political victimes.
* The trend will continue, so soon he will be guilty for all the
abortions or even the ejaculated spermatozoides.
Possibly. But he never persecuted in the name of atheism.
In 1937 he (more precisely, followers of his politics) actually did.
Many churches were destroyed or closed, while priests were sent to
camps in Siberia, where they died from winter or hunger. Ironically,
one church in Kiev was transformed to "Antireligion museum", and
remained it until 1990.
However, this picture is not complete without mentioning episode with
defending Moscow in 1941. Stalin had dream that Moscow will be saved
if the icon of holy Mary from Kazan will be carried in airplane three
times around the city. He ordered it to be done, and since then church
was not his enemy anymore. Unity of people became more important than
ideology. He reopened many churches during WWII, and never again
persecuted on antireligionist basis.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Firelock" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
22 Apr 2004 03:49:07 PM |
|
|
Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com> wrote in message news:<tjbe80pqcrl0p2kklnqhrlnrellthqgsmi@4ax.com>...
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:51:54 -0400, Jim Warren
<jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians
killed 100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
10.000.000 is probably an understatement. Persecution of 'unbelievers'
(being the wrong type of christians) took a lot more. Several vicious
religious wars ravaged Europe. Persecution of witches claimed at least
a million victims.
I thought even the wiccans were only claiming 50,000 to
100,000 - or are there people pushing this figure into
the stratosphere as well?
The crusades I don't even mention, nor the conquest
of America - which close to exterminated the indian population.
Though the vast majority of those deaths were due to diseases...
the europeans of the time had no idea how diseases spread,
it can't be said they deliberately wiped out the population
of the Americas.
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
22 Apr 2004 09:42:57 PM |
|
|
On 22 Apr 2004 13:49:07 -0700, (Firelock)
wrote:
Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com> wrote in message news:<tjbe80pqcrl0p2kklnqhrlnrellthqgsmi@4ax.com>...
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:51:54 -0400, Jim Warren
<jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians
killed 100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
10.000.000 is probably an understatement. Persecution of 'unbelievers'
(being the wrong type of christians) took a lot more. Several vicious
religious wars ravaged Europe. Persecution of witches claimed at least
a million victims.
I thought even the wiccans were only claiming 50,000 to
100,000 - or are there people pushing this figure into
the stratosphere as well?
Definitely not! It simply depends on which sources your follow and
what you accept as period. Low figures estimate around 350.000 persons
(women, mainly, but also children and men) killed, while higher
sources claim well over 3 million.
Also for the period: also difficult to pin point exactly. Most will
accept the period of 1000-1700 CE as reasonable. You could also defend
a position starting earlier, up to the end of the Roman Empire.
The crusades I don't even mention, nor the conquest
of America - which close to exterminated the indian population.
Though the vast majority of those deaths were due to diseases...
the europeans of the time had no idea how diseases spread,
it can't be said they deliberately wiped out the population
of the Americas.
Sorry, not quite. It is documented that blankets from diseased
infectious persons were given to indians. Also, the Spanish conquest
exterminated a large number of indians.
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Firelock" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
23 Apr 2004 08:46:15 AM |
|
|
Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com> wrote in message news:<890h80li3imii3b1j5cc3757h2clntejnd@4ax.com>...
On 22 Apr 2004 13:49:07 -0700, (Firelock)
wrote:
I thought even the wiccans were only claiming 50,000 to
100,000 [victims of the "burning times"] - or are there
people pushing this figure into the stratosphere as well?
Definitely not! It simply depends on which sources your follow
and what you accept as period.
And also what you accept as "witches". I've seen some
reports that lumped everyone ever executed as a heretic
in with the victims modern-day witches are claiming
kinship with.
Low figures estimate around 350.000 persons
(women, mainly, but also children and men) killed, while higher
sources claim well over 3 million.
Also for the period: also difficult to pin point exactly. Most will
accept the period of 1000-1700 CE as reasonable. You could also defend
a position starting earlier, up to the end of the Roman Empire.
What's your favorite source for these statistics? I'd like
to compare them with what I've been reading.
[Regarding the extermination of native american populations]
Though the vast majority of those deaths were due to diseases...
the europeans of the time had no idea how diseases spread,
it can't be said they deliberately wiped out the population
of the Americas.
Sorry, not quite. It is documented that blankets from diseased
infectious persons were given to indians.
Cite? I know of a report of *one* officer sending such blankets
on *one* occasion, but that report is questioned.
Deliberate starvation is a tactic there's far more support for.
The Sullivan-Clinton expedition during the American revolution
was deliberately designed to starve out the British Empire's
Iroquois allies, and everyone has heard of the buffalo hunts.
Also, the Spanish conquest
exterminated a large number of indians.
Agreed that the Spanish (and Portugese, and French, and British,
and Americans) of the time were guilty of astounding acts
of brutality against the indians they were in contact with.
My point was that the vast majority of the extermination,
sometimes estimated at over 90% of it, happened due to diseases,
often hitting tribes before those tribes had ever had direct
contact with white men. The famous Lewis and Clark expedition,
for example, found a lot of empty villages during their
explorations...the inhabitants had been wiped out before
they even got there.
Interesting link between the two subjects, persecution of
suspected witches and extermination of native american peoples.
I've read that one possible cause of the Salem hysteria was
a result of King Phillip's War, which devastated much of
New England - it seems that many of the participants in the
Salem events were refugees from the war, who had seen "heathen
savages" massacre "good, god-fearing people" wholesale -
obviously, to their minds, direct evidence that satan was
alive and taking a direct hand in the events of the world.
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
24 Apr 2004 01:01:58 AM |
|
|
On 23 Apr 2004 06:46:15 -0700, (Firelock)
wrote:
Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com> wrote in message news:<890h80li3imii3b1j5cc3757h2clntejnd@4ax.com>...
On 22 Apr 2004 13:49:07 -0700, (Firelock)
wrote:
I thought even the wiccans were only claiming 50,000 to
100,000 [victims of the "burning times"] - or are there
people pushing this figure into the stratosphere as well?
Definitely not! It simply depends on which sources your follow
and what you accept as period.
And also what you accept as "witches". I've seen some
reports that lumped everyone ever executed as a heretic
in with the victims modern-day witches are claiming
kinship with.
That is very difficult to say. We know that witches (persons flying on
broomsticks, doing evil things) don't exist. In many, if not most
cases, the church enforced a very private opinion of the inquisitor in
charge. If he found the accused to be a witch, [s]he was one. There is
no fixed rule what a witch was.
Technically anyone accused of being a witch had practically no chance
to proof themselves innocent, except by dying...
Low figures estimate around 350.000 persons
(women, mainly, but also children and men) killed, while higher
sources claim well over 3 million.
Also for the period: also difficult to pin point exactly. Most will
accept the period of 1000-1700 CE as reasonable. You could also defend
a position starting earlier, up to the end of the Roman Empire.
What's your favorite source for these statistics? I'd like
to compare them with what I've been reading.
My preference is to the high middle ages, when the popes got seriously
into the business of persecuting witches. Before we see a period of
relatively little persecution, even though the Romans had laws against
witchcraft. When the popes pronounced witches to exist, per suction
went through the roof. That was roughly (from memory) around 1100 CE.
[Regarding the extermination of native american populations]
Though the vast majority of those deaths were due to diseases...
the europeans of the time had no idea how diseases spread,
it can't be said they deliberately wiped out the population
of the Americas.
Sorry, not quite. It is documented that blankets from diseased
infectious persons were given to indians.
Cite? I know of a report of *one* officer sending such blankets
on *one* occasion, but that report is questioned.
Sorry, haven't got a cite. I read about a long time ago.
Deliberate starvation is a tactic there's far more support for.
The Sullivan-Clinton expedition during the American revolution
was deliberately designed to starve out the British Empire's
Iroquois allies, and everyone has heard of the buffalo hunts.
Agreed, but the English later American Indian genocide had nothing to
do with religion. More with outright ownership of the land.
Also, the Spanish conquest
exterminated a large number of indians.
Agreed that the Spanish (and Portugese, and French, and British,
and Americans) of the time were guilty of astounding acts
of brutality against the indians they were in contact with.
My point was that the vast majority of the extermination,
sometimes estimated at over 90% of it, happened due to diseases,
often hitting tribes before those tribes had ever had direct
contact with white men. The famous Lewis and Clark expedition,
for example, found a lot of empty villages during their
explorations...the inhabitants had been wiped out before
they even got there.
True, and as long as it was by accident I can't see that as
intentionally exterminating the indians, how convenient it might be.
Interesting link between the two subjects, persecution of
suspected witches and extermination of native american peoples.
I don't see a link here. Indians were killed in North America because
they lived on a piece of desirable real estate. Not because they
practised the wrong religion.
I've read that one possible cause of the Salem hysteria was
a result of King Phillip's War, which devastated much of
New England - it seems that many of the participants in the
Salem events were refugees from the war, who had seen "heathen
savages" massacre "good, god-fearing people" wholesale -
obviously, to their minds, direct evidence that satan was
alive and taking a direct hand in the events of the world.
Possible, but I know very little about the Salem trial. I'm not an
American. Just be thankful it was more or less one incident, not
government policy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Firelock" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
25 Apr 2004 12:12:30 PM |
|
|
Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com> wrote in message news:<evvj805emrqccdt1lu8kl0b10i0e6obf2i@4ax.com>...
On 23 Apr 2004 06:46:15 -0700, (Firelock)
wrote:
Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com> wrote in message news:<890h80li3imii3b1j5cc3757h2clntejnd@4ax.com>...
On 22 Apr 2004 13:49:07 -0700, (Firelock)
wrote:
I thought even the wiccans were only claiming 50,000 to
100,000 [victims of the "burning times"] - or are there
people pushing this figure into the stratosphere as well?
Definitely not! It simply depends on which sources your follow
and what you accept as period.
And also what you accept as "witches". I've seen some
reports that lumped everyone ever executed as a heretic
in with the victims modern-day witches are claiming
kinship with.
That is very difficult to say. We know that witches (persons flying on
broomsticks, doing evil things) don't exist. In many, if not most
cases, the church enforced a very private opinion of the inquisitor in
charge. If he found the accused to be a witch, [s]he was one.
You are aware that the vast majority of people executed as
witches were tried by *civil* courts, rather than church
authorities? Heresy and witchcraft were two very different
issues...for centuries, the church of europe's position
was that witchcraft didn't even exist.
There is no fixed rule what a witch was.
I'll agree with that one - considering that they were
being tried based on the fantasies of their accusers,
it would be hard to have fixed rules.
Technically anyone accused of being a witch had practically
no chance to proof themselves innocent, except by dying...
Depends...England at the height of the hysteria had about
a 1% conviction rate for accused witches.
Low figures estimate around 350.000 persons
(women, mainly, but also children and men) killed, while higher
sources claim well over 3 million.
Also for the period: also difficult to pin point exactly. Most will
accept the period of 1000-1700 CE as reasonable. You could also defend
a position starting earlier, up to the end of the Roman Empire.
What's your favorite source for these statistics? I'd like
to compare them with what I've been reading.
My preference is to the high middle ages, when the popes got seriously
into the business of persecuting witches. Before we see a period of
relatively little persecution, even though the Romans had laws against
witchcraft. When the popes pronounced witches to exist, per suction
went through the roof. That was roughly (from memory) around 1100 CE.
Thank you, but I'm still curious about your sources. Your
numbers are 10X as great as mine, I'd like to know how your
source is counting.
[Regarding the extermination of native american populations]
Though the vast majority of those deaths were due to diseases...
the europeans of the time had no idea how diseases spread,
it can't be said they deliberately wiped out the population
of the Americas.
Sorry, not quite. It is documented that blankets from diseased
infectious persons were given to indians.
Cite? I know of a report of *one* officer sending such blankets
on *one* occasion, but that report is questioned.
Sorry, haven't got a cite. I read about a long time ago.
A Colonel Bouquet wrote that he would try it against the
the Ohio Indians in 1763 (during the Pontiac uprising, just
after the French and Indian War), but there is no evidence
that he carried out his plan - he was very reluctant to do
so, as he was concerned that the disease would affect his
own men. Francis Parkman's _The Conspiracy of Pontiac_
discusses it.
Deliberate starvation is a tactic there's far more support for.
The Sullivan-Clinton expedition during the American revolution
was deliberately designed to starve out the British Empire's
Iroquois allies, and everyone has heard of the buffalo hunts.
Agreed, but the English later American Indian genocide had nothing to
do with religion. More with outright ownership of the land.
Religion was often used as an excuse. By some arguments, religion
never has anything to do with anything - it is only tossed into
issues when the people involved need an excuse for what they
want to do anyway. The Crusades were as much about trade routes
as about religion.
Also, the Spanish conquest
exterminated a large number of indians.
Agreed that the Spanish (and Portugese, and French, and British,
and Americans) of the time were guilty of astounding acts
of brutality against the indians they were in contact with.
My point was that the vast majority of the extermination,
sometimes estimated at over 90% of it, happened due to diseases,
often hitting tribes before those tribes had ever had direct
contact with white men. The famous Lewis and Clark expedition,
for example, found a lot of empty villages during their
explorations...the inhabitants had been wiped out before
they even got there.
True, and as long as it was by accident I can't see that as
intentionally exterminating the indians, how convenient it might be.
I was bringing up the accidental parts since the entire
casualty figures are usually lumped together and placed
at the feet of europeans and modern-day americans, without
regard for which parts involved what.
Interesting link between the two subjects, persecution of
suspected witches and extermination of native american peoples.
I don't see a link here.
The "interesting link" I was referring to was the
Salem witch trials. In some ways, what happened in Salem
was a result of wars against native americans.
Indians were killed in North America because
they lived on a piece of desirable real estate. Not because
they practised the wrong religion.
A vanishingly small number of "witches" were killed for
practising the wrong religion - the religion they were
popularly believed to follow only existed as a fantasy of
the church of europe. "Witches" were usually accused
to settle old scores or to enrich the witch hunters through
confiscation of property.
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "W. Syme" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
22 Apr 2004 03:58:39 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:51:54 -0400, Jim Warren
<jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians
killed 100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
That seems an incredibly hard to back up. Either he's made it up, or
he's a genius. I'm guessing the former.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse
gods. I disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and
effort looking for the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of
the covenant, which would have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a
Christian?
Sounds like spinning.
Google gives among others these:
"The greatness of Christianity did not lie in attempted negotiations
for
compromise with any similar philosophical opinions in the ancient
world, but
in its inexorable fanaticism in preaching and fighting for its own
doctrine."
[Adolph Hitler, "Mein Kampf" Vol. 1 Chapter 12]
"I believe today that my conduct is in accordance
with the will of the Almighty Creator."
[Adolph Hitler, _Mein Kampf_, pp. 46]
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week.
Was Stalin an atheist?
Probably. He said so, at least.
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed
into heaven according to the bible?
Depends what variety of xianity we're dealing with.
--
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thessalonians 5:21)
W. Syme (pseudonym), European, non-native English speaker, "soft" atheist.
Email will not be read.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adrian" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
25 Apr 2004 04:29:31 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 20:58:39 GMT, W. Syme
<Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:51:54 -0400, Jim Warren
<jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians
killed 100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
That seems an incredibly hard to back up. Either he's made it up, or
he's a genius. I'm guessing the former.
Those numbers seem to be on the small side to me; however, such a
proposition is not that absurd. You have to understand that
population grows exponentially so that back in 1000 AD entire cities
could be wiped out and it wouldn't be as many people as, say, the one
stray bomb in a large city today.
So, I think that it is a situation where whatever the actual numbers
are, they may well sort of show such a relationship (though these
sound embellished). Nevertheless, had the same things happenned in
this day and age (or during Stalin's or Hitler's day), the Christian
body count would have been much higher.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse
gods. I disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and
effort looking for the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of
the covenant, which would have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a
Christian?
Sounds like spinning.
Google gives among others these:
"The greatness of Christianity did not lie in attempted negotiations
for
compromise with any similar philosophical opinions in the ancient
world, but
in its inexorable fanaticism in preaching and fighting for its own
doctrine."
[Adolph Hitler, "Mein Kampf" Vol. 1 Chapter 12]
"I believe today that my conduct is in accordance
with the will of the Almighty Creator."
[Adolph Hitler, _Mein Kampf_, pp. 46]
I think that Rosenberg was the real pagan. I think paganism was
somewhat marginally part of the nazi party philosophy, but I don't
think that the Nazis were particularly religious about anything,
including hitler. Oh, you'll be able to find quotes one way and
another and even big time displays, but I don't think it really means
anything.
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week.
Was Stalin an atheist?
Probably. He said so, at least.
Yeah, 250k a week for a couple weeks. It must have been (would have
to have been) much less after that, although it put Hitler to shame
and was perhaps more than all the slaughtering the Christians did in
1000AD back when there were only a few million people in the entire
world in the first place.
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed
into heaven according to the bible?
Depends what variety of xianity we're dealing with.
I will say this about this sort of argument. First of all, you cannot
throw Hitler into this since the Nazis if nonChristian, certainly
weren't atheists. I do think it is legitimate to talk about Stalin,
even though he did not murder "in the name of atheism". No one has
ever murdered "in the name of theism" either. They all murder in the
name of their particular ideology. In Stalin's case, it was in teh
name of Communism, part and parcel of which was his atheism. So, I do
think that it is a legitimate example of atheists acting badly as any
particular one for Christians. (And, atheism is a very strong part of
Marx's "dialectical *materialism*" as espoused by the Marxist
Leninists such as Stalin.) And you can make all the same arguments
about it actually just being personal self-serving and not truly inthe
name of communism for the Christians as well.
So, I guess basically, I think that going around either saying how
"bad" Christianity is or how "bad" atheism is are both somewhat
hypocritical and short-sighted. Big atrocities have happened and can
happen under both a religious as well as an atheistic banner. And the
religious aspects of the views can play as big a role under atheistic
doctrines as they do under theist ones, not the least of which being
the rejection of religion/philosophy for science, and tryign to
inappropriately apply science to social issues. Such was a good
example of what happened, for instance, under the Nazis. Many
atheists are atheists because of their broader science oriented
worldview. If that worldview gets taken too far, then it could very
well lead to atrocities and tyranny.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Warren" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
25 Apr 2004 05:15:15 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:29:31 GMT, Adrian
<adriansdurham@houston.rr.com> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 20:58:39 GMT, W. Syme
<Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:51:54 -0400, Jim Warren
<jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians
killed 100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
That seems an incredibly hard to back up. Either he's made it up, or
he's a genius. I'm guessing the former.
Those numbers seem to be on the small side to me; however, such a
proposition is not that absurd. You have to understand that
population grows exponentially so that back in 1000 AD entire cities
could be wiped out and it wouldn't be as many people as, say, the one
stray bomb in a large city today.
So, I think that it is a situation where whatever the actual numbers
are, they may well sort of show such a relationship (though these
sound embellished). Nevertheless, had the same things happenned in
this day and age (or during Stalin's or Hitler's day), the Christian
body count would have been much higher.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse
gods. I disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and
effort looking for the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of
the covenant, which would have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a
Christian?
Sounds like spinning.
Google gives among others these:
"The greatness of Christianity did not lie in attempted negotiations
for
compromise with any similar philosophical opinions in the ancient
world, but
in its inexorable fanaticism in preaching and fighting for its own
doctrine."
[Adolph Hitler, "Mein Kampf" Vol. 1 Chapter 12]
"I believe today that my conduct is in accordance
with the will of the Almighty Creator."
[Adolph Hitler, _Mein Kampf_, pp. 46]
I think that Rosenberg was the real pagan. I think paganism was
somewhat marginally part of the nazi party philosophy, but I don't
think that the Nazis were particularly religious about anything,
including hitler. Oh, you'll be able to find quotes one way and
another and even big time displays, but I don't think it really means
anything.
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week.
Was Stalin an atheist?
Probably. He said so, at least.
Yeah, 250k a week for a couple weeks. It must have been (would have
to have been) much less after that, although it put Hitler to shame
and was perhaps more than all the slaughtering the Christians did in
1000AD back when there were only a few million people in the entire
world in the first place.
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed
into heaven according to the bible?
Depends what variety of xianity we're dealing with.
I will say this about this sort of argument. First of all, you cannot
throw Hitler into this since the Nazis if nonChristian, certainly
weren't atheists. I do think it is legitimate to talk about Stalin,
even though he did not murder "in the name of atheism". No one has
ever murdered "in the name of theism" either. They all murder in the
name of their particular ideology. In Stalin's case, it was in teh
name of Communism, part and parcel of which was his atheism. So, I do
think that it is a legitimate example of atheists acting badly as any
particular one for Christians. (And, atheism is a very strong part of
Marx's "dialectical *materialism*" as espoused by the Marxist
Leninists such as Stalin.) And you can make all the same arguments
about it actually just being personal self-serving and not truly inthe
name of communism for the Christians as well.
So, I guess basically, I think that going around either saying how
"bad" Christianity is or how "bad" atheism is are both somewhat
hypocritical and short-sighted. Big atrocities have happened and can
happen under both a religious as well as an atheistic banner. And the
religious aspects of the views can play as big a role under atheistic
doctrines as they do under theist ones, not the least of which being
the rejection of religion/philosophy for science, and tryign to
inappropriately apply science to social issues. Such was a good
example of what happened, for instance, under the Nazis. Many
atheists are atheists because of their broader science oriented
worldview. If that worldview gets taken too far, then it could very
well lead to atrocities and tyranny.
I agree with you, but please understand I am dealing with a ditto
head here, and he wants no part or parcel of any kind of rational
thought. His philosophy is Christian good, all else bad.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
21 Apr 2004 05:10:30 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:51:54 -0400, Jim Warren
<jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
I don't like arguing witrh morons. They lack the intelligence
necessary to grasp the simplest points.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians
killed 100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse
gods. I disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and
effort looking for the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of
the covenant, which would have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a
Christian?
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week.
Was Stalin an atheist?
It is irrelevant. The morons can't grasp the simple point that atheism
per se is the simple absence of the theists' prime motivator. If he
was atheist, he didn't do it because of his atheist. You have to look
for what people _are_ not for what they aren't, in order to find a
motivation.
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed
into heaven according to the bible?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harry F. Leopold" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
21 Apr 2004 10:05:43 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 9:51:54 -0500, Jim Warren wrote
(in message <792d801v28lgorunv6db7kjvd5qfa4p6h9@4ax.com>):
From: Jim Warren <jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians killed
100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse gods. I
disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and effort looking for
the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of the covenant, which would
have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a Christian?
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week. Was Stalin
an atheist?
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed into
heaven according to the bible?
Hitler was a Roman Catholic, born, baptized, lived and died one.
Hitler did not kill one person in the name of "atheism." Nor for that matter
did Stalin. Stalin killed anyone who disagreed with him or who might be in
disagreement with his policies. (Stalin was trained in the seminary, so he
would have known just how religion could/and had been used as a point of
political disagreement over the centuries.)
Communism (under Stalin) was officially "atheistic," however many Communists
were/are very theistic. Many of the South American communists for example.
But again those killed by Stalin, and other Communists, were not killed for
being theists, but for being (perceived) dangers to the power of the state.
--
"Nobody ever expects the peer reviewed journal!"
Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and literacy...literacy and
surprise....
Our two weapons are literacy and surprise... and ruthless
sticklery....
Our three weapons are literacy, surprise, and ruthless sticklery...
and an almost fanatical devotion to Strunk & White....
Our four... no...
Amongst our weapons... Amongst our weaponry...
are such elements as literacy, surprise...
(From Brien and Beowulf)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wieland the Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
21 Apr 2004 03:13:51 PM |
|
|
Harry F. Leopold wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 9:51:54 -0500, Jim Warren wrote
(in message <792d801v28lgorunv6db7kjvd5qfa4p6h9@4ax.com>):
From: Jim Warren <jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians killed
100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse gods. I
disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and effort looking
for the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of the covenant, which
would have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a Christian?
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week. Was
Stalin an atheist?
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed into
heaven according to the bible?
Hitler was a Roman Catholic, born, baptized, lived and died one.
Hitler did not kill one person in the name of "atheism." Nor for that
matter did Stalin. Stalin killed anyone who disagreed with him or who
might be in disagreement with his policies. (Stalin was trained in the
seminary, so he would have known just how religion could/and had been used
as a point of political disagreement over the centuries.)
Communism (under Stalin) was officially "atheistic," however many
Communists were/are very theistic. Many of the South American communists
for example. But again those killed by Stalin, and other Communists, were
not killed for being theists, but for being (perceived) dangers to the
power of the state.
Hello
just recently I did a little survey among survivers of Hitler`s empire,
friends and family members aged 80 and older, all living in Germany.
I asked them about their personal experience with the relationship between
the churches and the nazi regime.
They were students, Work-Service members, HJ leaders and young soldiers
in those days, most of them rather brainwashed by the well controlled
schools and HJ oranisation (HJ : Hitlerjugend).
Qustion 1: Was there any prosecution of the big churches known to you?
Most said no, they only heard about some examples after the war.
One person reported he had listened to a "shepherd's letter" issued
by Bishop v. Galen of Muenster read in church, in which the bishop
accused the nazi regime of closing monasteries and other church activities.
But he said, that didn't impress him or his friends, they moved to the back
seats of the church, so they didn't understand the next letter.
Others reported the churches seemed to support the nazi regime in different
ways, as there is no strict separation between church and state in Europe.
Question 2: Did you hear anything about neo-pagan religeon promotion?
Most said no, only after all was over. They thought they lived in an
all-Christian world in those days.
There were two exeptions: One person attended a Waffen-SS recruiting
and screening camp (they didn't accept him), and in this camp he learned
about the pseudo-religeous ideology of "blood and soil", which was
cultivated in the SS.
Another person, his father was a party member, left the church when
he became a soldier of the Luftwaffe, but he never became a pagan.
Question 3: Did you notice any resistance from church members against
the nazi regime?
Nobody reported of any experience of resistance from the churches,
but 2 people knew about acts of resistance by socialists or communists.
Question 4: In retrospect, do you think the nazi regime had a consistent
plan on how to deal with the Christian churches? (I only discussed that
with 2 people)
The answer was a clear no!
This probably is the reason why there are so different theories on
this matter: All are right, there simply was no strategy of the nazi
regime in this field, different nazi leaders had different
agendas.
If you are interested in more details, please tell me, I could
go on and on.
--
Wieland the Smith, AA#2040, EAC: herder of the trolls
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
22 Apr 2004 09:52:25 AM |
|
|
In article <c66kg0$8n3dd$1@ID-191925.news.uni-berlin.de>, Wieland the Smith
says...
snip
Hello
just recently I did a little survey among survivers of Hitler`s empire,
friends and family members aged 80 and older, all living in Germany.
I asked them about their personal experience with the relationship between
the churches and the nazi regime.
They were students, Work-Service members, HJ leaders and young soldiers
in those days, most of them rather brainwashed by the well controlled
schools and HJ oranisation (HJ : Hitlerjugend).
Qustion 1: Was there any prosecution of the big churches known to you?
Most said no, they only heard about some examples after the war.
One person reported he had listened to a "shepherd's letter" issued
by Bishop v. Galen of Muenster read in church, in which the bishop
accused the nazi regime of closing monasteries and other church activities.
But he said, that didn't impress him or his friends, they moved to the back
seats of the church, so they didn't understand the next letter.
Others reported the churches seemed to support the nazi regime in different
ways, as there is no strict separation between church and state in Europe.
Question 2: Did you hear anything about neo-pagan religeon promotion?
Most said no, only after all was over. They thought they lived in an
all-Christian world in those days.
There were two exeptions: One person attended a Waffen-SS recruiting
and screening camp (they didn't accept him), and in this camp he learned
about the pseudo-religeous ideology of "blood and soil", which was
cultivated in the SS.
Another person, his father was a party member, left the church when
he became a soldier of the Luftwaffe, but he never became a pagan.
Question 3: Did you notice any resistance from church members against
the nazi regime?
Nobody reported of any experience of resistance from the churches,
but 2 people knew about acts of resistance by socialists or communists.
Question 4: In retrospect, do you think the nazi regime had a consistent
plan on how to deal with the Christian churches? (I only discussed that
with 2 people)
The answer was a clear no!
This probably is the reason why there are so different theories on
this matter: All are right, there simply was no strategy of the nazi
regime in this field, different nazi leaders had different
agendas.
If you are interested in more details, please tell me, I could
go on and on.
Wow - Excellent post and extremely informative. Thanks so much for sharing :)
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harry F. Leopold" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
22 Apr 2004 09:24:35 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:13:51 -0500, Wieland the Smith wrote
(in message <c66kg0$8n3dd$1@ID-191925.news.uni-berlin.de>):
From: Wieland the Smith < >
Reply-To:
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
Harry F. Leopold wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 9:51:54 -0500, Jim Warren wrote
(in message <792d801v28lgorunv6db7kjvd5qfa4p6h9@4ax.com>):
From: Jim Warren <jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians killed
100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse gods. I
disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and effort looking
for the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of the covenant, which
would have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a Christian?
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week. Was
Stalin an atheist?
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed into
heaven according to the bible?
Hitler was a Roman Catholic, born, baptized, lived and died one.
Hitler did not kill one person in the name of "atheism." Nor for that
matter did Stalin. Stalin killed anyone who disagreed with him or who
might be in disagreement with his policies. (Stalin was trained in the
seminary, so he would have known just how religion could/and had been used
as a point of political disagreement over the centuries.)
Communism (under Stalin) was officially "atheistic," however many
Communists were/are very theistic. Many of the South American communists
for example. But again those killed by Stalin, and other Communists, were
not killed for being theists, but for being (perceived) dangers to the
power of the state.
Hello
just recently I did a little survey among survivers of Hitler`s empire,
friends and family members aged 80 and older, all living in Germany.
I asked them about their personal experience with the relationship between
the churches and the nazi regime.
They were students, Work-Service members, HJ leaders and young soldiers
in those days, most of them rather brainwashed by the well controlled
schools and HJ oranisation (HJ : Hitlerjugend).
Qustion 1: Was there any prosecution of the big churches known to you?
Most said no, they only heard about some examples after the war.
One person reported he had listened to a "shepherd's letter" issued
by Bishop v. Galen of Muenster read in church, in which the bishop
accused the nazi regime of closing monasteries and other church activities.
But he said, that didn't impress him or his friends, they moved to the back
seats of the church, so they didn't understand the next letter.
Others reported the churches seemed to support the nazi regime in different
ways, as there is no strict separation between church and state in Europe.
Question 2: Did you hear anything about neo-pagan religeon promotion?
Most said no, only after all was over. They thought they lived in an
all-Christian world in those days.
There were two exeptions: One person attended a Waffen-SS recruiting
and screening camp (they didn't accept him), and in this camp he learned
about the pseudo-religeous ideology of "blood and soil", which was
cultivated in the SS.
Another person, his father was a party member, left the church when
he became a soldier of the Luftwaffe, but he never became a pagan.
Question 3: Did you notice any resistance from church members against
the nazi regime?
Nobody reported of any experience of resistance from the churches,
but 2 people knew about acts of resistance by socialists or communists.
Question 4: In retrospect, do you think the nazi regime had a consistent
plan on how to deal with the Christian churches? (I only discussed that
with 2 people)
The answer was a clear no!
This probably is the reason why there are so different theories on
this matter: All are right, there simply was no strategy of the nazi
regime in this field, different nazi leaders had different
agendas.
If you are interested in more details, please tell me, I could
go on and on.
Yes, I am interested in anything you might have.
And thanks for the above, some very interesting stuff in there.
--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
"I've heard myself say a lot of vocal things, but I've never heard myself
think." - Duke32
.
|
|
|
| User: "Newton Joseph" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
23 Apr 2004 01:43:47 PM |
|
|
Hitler and Stalin Would Smile as They Recognize One of Their Own
By Newton
X
For close to fifty years America has had a pathological fear of a communist
takeover. Christianity and particularly the Catholic Church was stimulating
the fear because they recognized that communism was their competitors in
their hostility toward Democracy. I will make a brief case that Christianity
(the Catholic Church) was projecting their own dark side onto communism.
America had spent so much time, money and lives to buttress our
front door from
a communist attack. America was oblivious to the fascist incursion through
the back door.
America was hardly aware of this incursion because there was already at work
a fifth column subverting our basic freedom called Christianity. In our own
time, the Catholic Church has backed every Fascist who came to power because
they shared a common anti-democratic philosophy.
It was Hitler in Germany, Franco in Spain, Salazar of Portugal,
Batista of Cuba, Augusto Pinochet, Chilean Dictator, Mussolini of Italy and
Ante Pavelic of Crocia, (with the help of Hitler) When Pavelic and his
Ustashi (Nazi) hoards created an independent Catholic state of Croatia they
murdered hundreds of thousands of men, women, and children because they were
either Moslems or Eastern Orthodox and in the event any Jews survived
Hitler's
Holocaust was massacred in the Vatican's Holocaust.*
How many lay people know about (or priests who do not speak
Latin) Rome's Syllabus of Condemned opinions?. The syllabus was never
translated into modern language from its original Latin (except by Joseph
McCabe former monk and professor of philosophy and atheist.) a sample of
condemned opinions: (I chose the shorter ones for expediency)
2. Human reason is the sole judge of truth and falseness, good and evil. It
is a law unto itself and suffices, by its natural resources, to promote the
welfare of nations
5. Devine revelations is imperfect and therefore subject to continual and
indefinite progress and this corresponds to the advance of human reason.
7. The prophesies and miracles that are contained in Holy Writ are poetic
fiction, and the mysteries of the Christian faith are the outcome of
philosophic inquiries: the contents of both the new and old testaments are
fiction, and Jesus Christ is a mythical figure.
8. Since human reason is as valuable as religion, theological matters are to
be treated in the same way as philosophical.
*The Vatican Holocaust: by Avro Mahattan published by Ozark Books,
-2-
9. All dogmas, without exception, of the Christian religion is
the subject of natural science or philosophy. Human reason can in the course
in time be so developed that by its natural force and the principles it can
attain all knowledge, even the profound, provided that these dogmas have
been submitted to reason as a subject. The Church not only must never
pass judgment on philosophy but must tolerate its errors and leave it to
correct them itself.
10. Since the philosopher is one thing and the philosophy
another, the former has the right and the duty to submit to authority which
he believes to be sound, but philosophy neither can nor ought to bow to
authority.
11. The Church not only must never pass judgment on philosophy but must
tolerate its errors and leave it to correct them itself.
12. The decrees of the apostolic see and the Roman congregations are an
impediment to the free advances of science.
13. The methods and the principles, which the older scholastic
doctors used in studying theology, are not in the least in harmony with the
needs of our time and the progress of the sciences
14. Philosophy must be studied without any regard to supernatural
revelation.
15. Every man is free to adopt and profess any religion which under the
guidance of reason he believes to be true
18. Protestantism is only another form of the one true Christian religion,
and God is just as pleased for men to join it as to join the Catholic
Church.
20. Ecclesiastical authority must not use its powers without the permission
and consent of the civil government.
21. The church has no power to lay down dogmatically that the religion of
the Catholic Church is the one true church
24. The church has no power to use force or any temporal power, direct or
indirect
27. The sacred ministry of the church and the Roman pontiff must be entirely
without the permission of the government.
28. Bishops cannot be allowed to publish even the pope's letters
without the permission
of the government
3.
30. The immunity of the church and of Ecclesiastical persons has its
origin in civil law.
31. The Ecclesiastical court for hearing secular charges must be
entirely abolished,
without consulting or even against the protest of the Apostolic see.
34. The idea that the Roman pontiff may be compared to a free prince
acting in the universal church is medieval.
37. It is lawful to establish national churches that are not subject
to the authority of the Roman pontiff and are, in fact, entirely separated.
39. A republic, as the origin and power of all rights, has an
unlimited power.
40. The teaching of the Catholic Church is opposed to the welfare of
human society.
42. In a conflict of law between two powers the civil takes
precedence.
55. The church must be separated from the state and the state from the
church.
56. Moral law does not need a Devine sanction, it is not at all
necessary that human laws should conform to the law of nature or derive
their binding force from God.
58. No forces are to be recognized which are not inherent in matter,
and all moral
and decent effort ought to be expended in accumulating wealth and
procuring pleasure in
any way.
59. Right consist of a material fact, "Duties of Man" is an empty
phrase, and all
man's acts have the force of right.
62. The principle of non-intervention is to be recommended and
observed.
63. It is lawful to refuse to obey and even rebel against legitimate
princes.
74. Matrimonial and Espousal cases belong by their very nature to the
civil courts.
80. The Roman pontiff can and ought to be reconciled and come to terms
with
progress, liberalism, and modern civilization.
To these theologians add these which are, they say, condemned in the
bull itself; (1) that the highest public interest and the progress of
society emphatically demand that human society be constituted and governed
without any regard for religion, as if there were no such thing.
-4-
I want to remind you these are concepts the Catholic Church condemns.
(3) That freedom of conscience and religion are the right of every man, and
it ought to be decreed by law in every properly-constituted society that all
citizens have the right to all freedom without the coercion of either Civil
or Ecclesiastical authority so that they may publicly declare their opinions
either vocally or in print or in any other way. (4) That the will of the
people, made known either by public opinion or in any other way, is the
supreme law, apart from any divine or human right, and that in
the political order accomplished facts have, by the very fact that
they are accomplished, the force of law. (8) That the clergy, being hostile
to true and useful science and the advance of civilization, must be excluded
from all share in the training and education of the young.
If this syllabus was read by 10,000 Catholics on the street and told
they were Fascist or Communistic and they would be expected to embrace them
would provoke indignation and soundly reject them as being undemocratic
unaware these are
the credos their religion (Catholicism) demands their parishioners to
accept.
END
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Warren" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
21 Apr 2004 05:01:17 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 22:13:51 +0200, Wieland the Smith
<renenospamschulz@gmx.net> wrote:
Harry F. Leopold wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 9:51:54 -0500, Jim Warren wrote
(in message <792d801v28lgorunv6db7kjvd5qfa4p6h9@4ax.com>):
From: Jim Warren <jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians killed
100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse gods. I
disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and effort looking
for the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of the covenant, which
would have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a Christian?
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week. Was
Stalin an atheist?
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed into
heaven according to the bible?
Hitler was a Roman Catholic, born, baptized, lived and died one.
Hitler did not kill one person in the name of "atheism." Nor for that
matter did Stalin. Stalin killed anyone who disagreed with him or who
might be in disagreement with his policies. (Stalin was trained in the
seminary, so he would have known just how religion could/and had been used
as a point of political disagreement over the centuries.)
Communism (under Stalin) was officially "atheistic," however many
Communists were/are very theistic. Many of the South American communists
for example. But again those killed by Stalin, and other Communists, were
not killed for being theists, but for being (perceived) dangers to the
power of the state.
Hello
just recently I did a little survey among survivers of Hitler`s empire,
friends and family members aged 80 and older, all living in Germany.
I asked them about their personal experience with the relationship between
the churches and the nazi regime.
They were students, Work-Service members, HJ leaders and young soldiers
in those days, most of them rather brainwashed by the well controlled
schools and HJ oranisation (HJ : Hitlerjugend).
Qustion 1: Was there any prosecution of the big churches known to you?
Most said no, they only heard about some examples after the war.
One person reported he had listened to a "shepherd's letter" issued
by Bishop v. Galen of Muenster read in church, in which the bishop
accused the nazi regime of closing monasteries and other church activities.
But he said, that didn't impress him or his friends, they moved to the back
seats of the church, so they didn't understand the next letter.
Others reported the churches seemed to support the nazi regime in different
ways, as there is no strict separation between church and state in Europe.
Question 2: Did you hear anything about neo-pagan religeon promotion?
Most said no, only after all was over. They thought they lived in an
all-Christian world in those days.
There were two exeptions: One person attended a Waffen-SS recruiting
and screening camp (they didn't accept him), and in this camp he learned
about the pseudo-religeous ideology of "blood and soil", which was
cultivated in the SS.
Another person, his father was a party member, left the church when
he became a soldier of the Luftwaffe, but he never became a pagan.
Question 3: Did you notice any resistance from church members against
the nazi regime?
Nobody reported of any experience of resistance from the churches,
but 2 people knew about acts of resistance by socialists or communists.
Question 4: In retrospect, do you think the nazi regime had a consistent
plan on how to deal with the Christian churches? (I only discussed that
with 2 people)
The answer was a clear no!
This probably is the reason why there are so different theories on
this matter: All are right, there simply was no strategy of the nazi
regime in this field, different nazi leaders had different
agendas.
If you are interested in more details, please tell me, I could
go on and on.
Please go on your post was fascinating. I want more!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harry F. Leopold" |
|
| Title: Re: Hitler/Stalin question |
21 Apr 2004 10:07:58 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 9:51:54 -0500, Jim Warren wrote
(in message <792d801v28lgorunv6db7kjvd5qfa4p6h9@4ax.com>):
From: Jim Warren <jmwarren@pilot.msu.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
I enjoy arguing with the neo cons on alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
One of the ditto heads stated that through out history Christians killed
100,000 to 1,000,0000 people max.
He also stated that Hitler was not Christian but worshipped Norse gods. I
disagreed and said why did Hitler spend so much time and effort looking for
the Holy Grail, Spear of Longinus, and The Ark of the covenant, which would
have no significance to pagans. Was Hitler a Christian?
He also said that Joseph Stalin an atheist killed 250,000 a week. Was Stalin
an atheist?
If Hitler made a genuine act of contrition would he not be allowed into
heaven according to the bible?
Oh yes, I forgot this last bit, yes, according to the bible Hitler would be
allowed into heaven. (But the Jews he killed would not, not being properly
Christian.)
--
Harry F. Leopold
aa #2076
AA/Vet #4
The Prints of Darkness
(remove gene to email)
"Jesus loves you, but Cthulu thinks you're part of a nutritious breakfast."-
Dr. Smartass
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|