Religions > Atheism > How come Evangelical Miers and Evangelical Hecht are having sex without marriage?
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"JOE" |
| Date: |
05 Oct 2005 11:58:11 AM |
| Object: |
How come Evangelical Miers and Evangelical Hecht are having sex without marriage? |
News reports:
- Miers' longtime on-and-off companion — himself a Texas Supreme Court
justice - said.....
- "She hasn't said a lot, but you don't go to a church for 25 years if
you're not comfortable with what they think," said Texas Supreme Court
Justice Nathan Hecht of Austin, Texas, a church member who says he's
shared a romantic relationship with Miers for more than 30 years.....
So these two evangelicals have been fucking each other recreationally
outside marriage for THIRTY (30) years?
.
|
|
| User: "Shawn Hirn" |
|
| Title: Re: How come Evangelical Miers and Evangelical Hecht are having sex without marriage? |
05 Oct 2005 06:52:40 PM |
|
|
In article <6e18k1dlgn8c9nu4i58tdetpavdohvnjcp@4ax.com>,
JOE <eat@joes.com> wrote:
News reports:
- Miers' longtime on-and-off companion — himself a Texas Supreme Court
justice - said.....
- "She hasn't said a lot, but you don't go to a church for 25 years if
you're not comfortable with what they think," said Texas Supreme Court
Justice Nathan Hecht of Austin, Texas, a church member who says he's
shared a romantic relationship with Miers for more than 30 years.....
So these two evangelicals have been fucking each other recreationally
outside marriage for THIRTY (30) years?
How do you know that? I know lots of people who have been going to
church for many years who also do not accept everything their church
leaders say as gospel. If people took their church leaders seriously,
there would be virtually no divorce in this country, and George Bush
would certainly not have gone to invade Iraq or signed off on death
penalty cases when he was governor, and John Kerry would be anti-choice.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ssmithers" |
|
| Title: George W. Bush, "nothing more than a cardboard cowboy" |
05 Oct 2005 07:20:45 PM |
|
|
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7483.shtml
A Cardboard Cowboy
By DOUG THOMPSON
George W. Bush knows he’s in trouble when even the radical right turns
on him like a rabid dog.
The echoes from a rare Presidential press conference had not yet died
before the always-contentious conservatives descended on Bush like
iguanas in a feeding frenzy for nominating another of his cronies for
the Supreme Court.
To the right-wing, Bush’s selection of White House counsel Harriet
Miers, an unknown with no judicial experience, was no less than
outright treason to the conservative cause. They wanted a
fire-breathing conservative judge who would vote to send America back
into the dark ages. Nothing less could satisfy the hard-core.
Just a few months ago, these same wild-eyed conservatives praised Bush
to the heavens for being a “great leader” who, they said, would never
“cave in to polls.” Now these same whiners and moaners decry Bush as
spineless sap who, you guessed it, caved in to the polls.
“Here's what we do know: Polls are driving President Bush's court
picks. At a low ebb in his presidency, the president has passed over
well-known, if controversial, constitutionalists and chosen a
sphinx-like presidential pal," whines Mark Moller, editor of the
Supreme Court Review published by the right-wing Cato Institute.
Bill Kristol, editor of the even-more conservative Weekly Standard
magazine, said he was "disappointed, depressed and demoralized" by the
appointment of Miers.
"It is very hard to avoid the conclusion that President Bush flinched
from a fight on constitutional philosophy," Kristol claims.
Somebody get out a violin. The right-wing cabal is in tears and there
ain’t enough Kleenex to go around.
In one sense, these crybabies might be right. Bush, who never really
had to fight for anything in his life, is battered and bruised by
ever-increasing setbacks to his presidency and is clearly tired. One
only had to watch his listless performance at the press conference
Tuesday to see that. Or maybe it’s the drugs and booze.
Faced with a war in Iraq that he can’t win, under fire from his own
party for uncontrolled spending habits that has sent any form of
fiscal control into oblivion and unable to advance his showcase
program of Social Security “reform,” Bush has run out of steam. He’s a
lame-duck marking time, treading water while the sharks circle.
A compassionate person might feel sorry for Bush but I’m short on
compassion when it comes to politicians. Bush boxed himself into a
corner, ignoring reality to pursue his cowboy fantasy of another Teddy
Roosevelt leading the charge up San Juan Hill (a legend which itself
is more fantasy than reality).
The mainstreamers make a big deal out of Bush’s loss of “swagger.”
Gone, they say, is the strong, macho image that Bush tried to hard to
portray as he struggled to perform a job when he had neither the
integrity nor the qualifications.
But Bush’s image was just that – image. No substance, no backbone, no
leadership. The President of the United States was, and is, nothing
more than a cardboard cowboy, a creation of political spinmeisters and
propped up by the extremist elements of Republican Party determined to
maintain power at any cost.
Sooner or later the façade had to crumble so the shallow frat boy,
bored with yet another job he could not handle, could emerge. The
dilettante who has drifted through life with opportunities provided by
others has blown yet another chance to prove himself. Daddy’s
connections and power provided all the past opportunities and he
frittered those away.
Now the stakes are much higher and even Daddy keeps his distance. The
American people abandoned Bush months ago – fed up with the duplicity,
the economy and a useless, senseless war. Sensible Republicans, tired
of seeing one of their own drive federal spending and the size of
government to record levels, took a hike as well.
Now the right-wing extremists have walked away, leaving Bush alone
with his failures. When the final chapter is written on the failed
Presidency of George W. Bush, it will show the man whose only talent
was an ability to point the finger of blame at others had, in the end,
no one left to blame but himself.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "maf1029 ©2001-2008" |
|
| Title: Re: How come Evangelical Miers and Evangelical Hecht are having sex without marriage? |
05 Oct 2005 12:25:49 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:58:11 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of JOE
<eat@joes.com>
News reports:
- Miers' longtime on-and-off companion — himself a Texas Supreme Court
justice - said.....
- "She hasn't said a lot, but you don't go to a church for 25 years if
you're not comfortable with what they think," said Texas Supreme Court
Justice Nathan Hecht of Austin, Texas, a church member who says he's
shared a romantic relationship with Miers for more than 30 years.....
So these two evangelicals have been fucking each other recreationally
outside marriage for THIRTY (30) years?
And this surprises you because.....?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Williams" |
|
| Title: Re: How come Evangelical Miers and Evangelical Hecht are having sex without marriage? |
05 Oct 2005 12:46:05 PM |
|
|
pertinent question: has nathan ever impregnated harriet?
where is the baby??
.
|
|
|
| User: "turk" |
|
| Title: Re: How come Evangelical Miers and Evangelical Hecht are having sex without marriage? |
05 Oct 2005 01:54:27 PM |
|
|
"Williams" <c-williams3@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1128534365.366912.40090@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
pertinent question: has nathan ever impregnated harriet?
where is the baby??
Abortion is fine if you go to church, you know. They just want to regulate
the bodies of heathen women.
turk
--
My last vestige of "hands off religion" respect disappeared in the smoke and
choking dust of September 11th 2001, followed by the "National Day of
Prayer," when prelates and pastors did their tremulous Martin Luther King
impersonations and urged people of mutually incompatible faiths to hold
hands, united in homage to the very force that caused the problem in the
first place.
-- Richard Dawkins, The Devil's Chaplain (2004)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
