| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Fred Stone" |
| Date: |
23 Mar 2007 04:15:20 PM |
| Object: |
How Should Britain Respond? |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
HMS Cornwall
Commodore reacts
Fifteen British Navy personnel have been captured at gunpoint by Iranian
forces, the Ministry of Defence says.
The men were seized at 1030 local time when they boarded a boat in the
Gulf, off the coast of Iraq, which they suspected was smuggling cars.
The Royal Navy said the group was on a routine patrol in Iraqi waters and
were understood to be unharmed.
But Iranian state television quoted the Iran foreign ministry as saying
they had illegally entered Iranian waters.
The Associated Press news agency is quoting US Navy official, Commander
Kevin Aandahl, as saying that Iran's Revolutionary Guard were
responsible...
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate for
opening up the audience." - Al Gore
.
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
27 Mar 2007 11:05:22 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know so much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the
facts have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they
said' - and you immediately jumped on one side and
refused to actually think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said. I *do*
believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet,
Mr. Lying Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You
know, that thing you have never asked for or needed.
However, you've certainly lapped up one side without
seeing any proof.
Unless, of course, you have some arcane way to show
that the Brits are correct that involves more than
simply lapping up what they said. Me, I bet you don't.
That has never stopped you before, however. See what I
said about you not letting them get in the way - you
certainly illustrated my point for me.
And even more so.
And again - it's like you just can't help yourself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 07:42:26 AM |
|
|
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know so much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the
facts have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they
said' - and you immediately jumped on one side and
refused to actually think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said. I *do*
believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet,
Mr. Lying Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You
know, that thing you have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you conveniently
ignore, just like you always do.
However, you've certainly lapped up one side without
seeing any proof.
I know you are, but what am I?
Unless, of course, you have some arcane way to show
that the Brits are correct that involves more than
simply lapping up what they said. Me, I bet you don't.
That has never stopped you before, however. See what I
said about you not letting them get in the way - you
certainly illustrated my point for me.
And even more so.
And again - it's like you just can't help yourself.
I know you are, but what am I?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate
for opening up the audience." - Al Gore
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 09:11:50 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know so much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the
facts have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they
said' - and you immediately jumped on one side and
refused to actually think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said. I *do*
believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet,
Mr. Lying Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You
know, that thing you have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you conveniently
ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make
sure it's more compelling than simply quoting what the
Admiralty says.
I bet you can't do that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 08:40:03 AM |
|
|
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:MNqdnelJYLgx6pfbnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know so much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the
facts have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they
said' - and you immediately jumped on one side and
refused to actually think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said. I *do*
believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet,
Mr. Lying Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You
know, that thing you have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you conveniently
ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make
sure it's more compelling than simply quoting what the
Admiralty says.
Nicely poisoned well there, IAAH.
I bet you can't do that.
I bet you can't do without well-poisoning either.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate
for opening up the audience." - Al Gore
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 10:02:49 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:MNqdnelJYLgx6pfbnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know so much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the
facts have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they
said' - and you immediately jumped on one side and
refused to actually think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said. I *do*
believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet,
Mr. Lying Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You
know, that thing you have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you conveniently
ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make
sure it's more compelling than simply quoting what the
Admiralty says.
Nicely poisoned well there, IAAH.
Nope, no evidence there. Shall I take it as read that
you will not be providing any?
I'll try to contain my surprise if you actually do so.
I bet you can't do that.
I bet you can't do without well-poisoning either.
I already told you, I don't believe either story yet.
*I* have no claim to provide evidence for.
You *do*, and you've failed miserably, yet again.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 09:50:31 AM |
|
|
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:YZCdnW0fg9ECHpfbnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:MNqdnelJYLgx6pfbnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know so
much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the
facts have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they
said' - and you immediately jumped on one side and
refused to actually think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said. I
*do*
believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet,
Mr. Lying Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You
know, that thing you have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you conveniently
ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make
sure it's more compelling than simply quoting what the
Admiralty says.
Nicely poisoned well there, IAAH.
Nope, no evidence there. Shall I take it as read that
you will not be providing any?
Keep those fallacies coming, IAAH, you're batting 1.000, as usual.
I'll try to contain my surprise if you actually do so.
You'll just go into denial like you always do.
I bet you can't do that.
I bet you can't do without well-poisoning either.
I already told you, I don't believe either story yet.
*I* have no claim to provide evidence for.
You *do*, and you've failed miserably, yet again.
You aren't in any position to judge whether I've succeeded or not.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate
for opening up the audience." - Al Gore
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 10:48:08 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:YZCdnW0fg9ECHpfbnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:MNqdnelJYLgx6pfbnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know so
much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the
facts have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they
said' - and you immediately jumped on one side and
refused to actually think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said. I
*do*
believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet,
Mr. Lying Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You
know, that thing you have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you conveniently
ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make
sure it's more compelling than simply quoting what the
Admiralty says.
Nicely poisoned well there, IAAH.
Nope, no evidence there. Shall I take it as read that
you will not be providing any?
Keep those fallacies coming, IAAH, you're batting 1.000, as usual.
Yes, I was absolutely right about your lack of
evidence. Since the Admiralty just released something
more than "We say so", it's plain you didn't have
evidence to back up your prior claims.
As usual.
I'll try to contain my surprise if you actually do so.
You'll just go into denial like you always do.
Freddy, it's not denial when it's not evidence.
I bet you can't do that.
I bet you can't do without well-poisoning either.
I already told you, I don't believe either story yet.
*I* have no claim to provide evidence for.
You *do*, and you've failed miserably, yet again.
You aren't in any position to judge whether I've succeeded or not.
Oh yes, I am. You've failed. Deal and move on to your
next failure.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 11:02:02 AM |
|
|
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:Zcudne-
EW7WgE5fbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:YZCdnW0fg9ECHpfbnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:MNqdnelJYLgx6pfbnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know so
much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the
facts have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they
said' - and you immediately jumped on one side and
refused to actually think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said. I
*do*
believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet,
Mr. Lying Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You
know, that thing you have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you conveniently
ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make
sure it's more compelling than simply quoting what the
Admiralty says.
Nicely poisoned well there, IAAH.
Nope, no evidence there. Shall I take it as read that
you will not be providing any?
Keep those fallacies coming, IAAH, you're batting 1.000, as usual.
Yes, I was absolutely right about your lack of
evidence. Since the Admiralty just released something
more than "We say so", it's plain you didn't have
evidence to back up your prior claims.
As usual.
Since my prior claims were that I believe the Royal Navy, and there
there *is* evidence, which was true since they just released it, you're
full of it, as usual, IAAH.
I'll try to contain my surprise if you actually do so.
You'll just go into denial like you always do.
Freddy, it's not denial when it's not evidence.
It's denial.
I bet you can't do that.
I bet you can't do without well-poisoning either.
I already told you, I don't believe either story yet.
*I* have no claim to provide evidence for.
You *do*, and you've failed miserably, yet again.
You aren't in any position to judge whether I've succeeded or not.
Oh yes, I am. You've failed. Deal and move on to your
next failure.
Bwaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate
for opening up the audience." - Al Gore
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 10:45:49 AM |
|
|
IAAH wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:MNqdnelJYLgx6pfbnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know so much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the facts
have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they said' - and
you immediately jumped on one side and refused to actually think
about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said. I
*do* believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet, Mr. Lying
Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You know, that thing you have
never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you conveniently
ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make sure it's more
compelling than simply quoting what the Admiralty says.
Nicely poisoned well there, IAAH.
Nope, no evidence there. Shall I take it as read that you will not be
providing any?
I'll try to contain my surprise if you actually do so.
Of course, the Admiralty *has* started releasing the
evidence that wasn't available before - meaning that
until now, you didn't actually have any.
Your statements were not based on facts, Fred. It's
business as usual for you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 11:00:17 AM |
|
|
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:ZcudneyEW7UvEJfbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d@giganews.com:
IAAH wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:MNqdnelJYLgx6pfbnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in your
way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know so
much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the facts
have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they said' - and
you immediately jumped on one side and refused to actually
think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said. I
*do* believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet, Mr. Lying
Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You know, that thing you
have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you conveniently
ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make sure it's
more compelling than simply quoting what the Admiralty says.
Nicely poisoned well there, IAAH.
Nope, no evidence there. Shall I take it as read that you will not be
providing any?
I'll try to contain my surprise if you actually do so.
Of course, the Admiralty *has* started releasing the
evidence that wasn't available before - meaning that
until now, you didn't actually have any.
PPpppppppPPPpPpBBBBbbbbbTTTTTTTttttttt!!!!!
Your statements were not based on facts, Fred. It's
business as usual for you.
Meaning that you've been overtaken by events, IAAH, as usual.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate
for opening up the audience." - Al Gore
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 12:57:19 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:ZcudneyEW7UvEJfbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d@giganews.com:
IAAH wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:MNqdnelJYLgx6pfbnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in your
way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know so
much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the facts
have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they said' - and
you immediately jumped on one side and refused to actually
think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said. I
*do* believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet, Mr. Lying
Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You know, that thing you
have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you conveniently
ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make sure it's
more compelling than simply quoting what the Admiralty says.
Nicely poisoned well there, IAAH.
Nope, no evidence there. Shall I take it as read that you will not be
providing any?
I'll try to contain my surprise if you actually do so.
Of course, the Admiralty *has* started releasing the
evidence that wasn't available before - meaning that
until now, you didn't actually have any.
PPpppppppPPPpPpBBBBbbbbbTTTTTTTttttttt!!!!!
Your statements were not based on facts, Fred. It's
business as usual for you.
Meaning that you've been overtaken by events, IAAH, as usual.
No, Freddy. You jumped to conclusions that have yet to
be proven - and after your long-standing, ongoing WMD
debacle, *you* have a higher standard of evidence to
live up to.
Of course, from you ANY evidence would be a higher
standard than you've lived up to so far.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 04:07:40 PM |
|
|
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:A6SdnSio1uEYMZfbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:ZcudneyEW7UvEJfbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d@giganews.com:
IAAH wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:MNqdnelJYLgx6pfbnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship
was. Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get
in your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know so
much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the
facts have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they said' -
and you immediately jumped on one side and refused to
actually think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said. I
*do* believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of
Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet, Mr.
Lying Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You know, that thing
you have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you
conveniently ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make sure it's
more compelling than simply quoting what the Admiralty says.
Nicely poisoned well there, IAAH.
Nope, no evidence there. Shall I take it as read that you will not
be providing any?
I'll try to contain my surprise if you actually do so.
Of course, the Admiralty *has* started releasing the
evidence that wasn't available before - meaning that
until now, you didn't actually have any.
PPpppppppPPPpPpBBBBbbbbbTTTTTTTttttttt!!!!!
Your statements were not based on facts, Fred. It's
business as usual for you.
Meaning that you've been overtaken by events, IAAH, as usual.
No, Freddy. You jumped to conclusions that have yet to
be proven
Yeah, what a leap - I assumed that the Royal Navy keeps meticulous
records. I'm really going out on a limb there.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate
for opening up the audience." - Al Gore
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 06:15:53 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:A6SdnSio1uEYMZfbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:ZcudneyEW7UvEJfbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d@giganews.com:
IAAH wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:MNqdnelJYLgx6pfbnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship
was. Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get
in your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know so
much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the
facts have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they said' -
and you immediately jumped on one side and refused to
actually think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said. I
*do* believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of
Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet, Mr.
Lying Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You know, that thing
you have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you
conveniently ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make sure it's
more compelling than simply quoting what the Admiralty says.
Nicely poisoned well there, IAAH.
Nope, no evidence there. Shall I take it as read that you will not
be providing any?
I'll try to contain my surprise if you actually do so.
Of course, the Admiralty *has* started releasing the
evidence that wasn't available before - meaning that
until now, you didn't actually have any.
PPpppppppPPPpPpBBBBbbbbbTTTTTTTttttttt!!!!!
Your statements were not based on facts, Fred. It's
business as usual for you.
Meaning that you've been overtaken by events, IAAH, as usual.
No, Freddy. You jumped to conclusions that have yet to
be proven
Yeah, what a leap - I assumed that the Royal Navy keeps meticulous
records. I'm really going out on a limb there.
Bub, you assumed both the British and American
administration were interested in good intelligence
about weapons in Iraq, and look where that got you.
Your assumptions suck. No, really. They suck out loud.
You couldn't make worse assumptions if you had some
kind of nuclear-powered bad-assumption machine. You
assumed facts not in evidence like the credulous
sycophant like you are.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 06:20:51 PM |
|
|
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:CfKdnT2yr-
KyapfbnZ2dnUVZ_vninZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:A6SdnSio1uEYMZfbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:ZcudneyEW7UvEJfbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d@giganews.com:
IAAH wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:MNqdnelJYLgx6pfbnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship
was. Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get
in your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know
so
much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the
facts have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they said' -
and you immediately jumped on one side and refused to
actually think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said.
I
*do* believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of
Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet, Mr.
Lying Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You know, that
thing
you have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you
conveniently ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make sure it's
more compelling than simply quoting what the Admiralty says.
Nicely poisoned well there, IAAH.
Nope, no evidence there. Shall I take it as read that you will
not
be providing any?
I'll try to contain my surprise if you actually do so.
Of course, the Admiralty *has* started releasing the
evidence that wasn't available before - meaning that
until now, you didn't actually have any.
PPpppppppPPPpPpBBBBbbbbbTTTTTTTttttttt!!!!!
Your statements were not based on facts, Fred. It's
business as usual for you.
Meaning that you've been overtaken by events, IAAH, as usual.
No, Freddy. You jumped to conclusions that have yet to
be proven
Yeah, what a leap - I assumed that the Royal Navy keeps meticulous
records. I'm really going out on a limb there.
Bub, you assumed both the British and American
administration were interested in good intelligence
about weapons in Iraq, and look where that got you.
Non-sequiturs won't change the fact that those British warships weren't
in Iranian waters, IAAH. I was right, and you were full of *****.
Your assumptions suck. No, really. They suck out loud.
That's why I was right and you were full of *****.
You couldn't make worse assumptions if you had some
kind of nuclear-powered bad-assumption machine.
You couldn't be more wrong if you *tried* to be wrong.
You
assumed facts not in evidence like the credulous
sycophant like you are.
Since when is the Royal Navy's attention to detail not in evidence?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"It's wrong to use fear of terrorism as a political tool. Fear of
Republicanism and corporate power is what should be used instead."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
29 Mar 2007 01:52:21 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
IAAH <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote
Your assumptions suck. No, really. They suck out loud.
That's why I was right and you were full of *****.
You're making a joke, right?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
29 Mar 2007 08:24:18 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in news:1175151140.992590.211600
@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
IAAH <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote
Your assumptions suck. No, really. They suck out loud.
That's why I was right and you were full of *****.
You're making a joke, right?
You figure it out, you're such a smart feller.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"It's wrong to use fear of terrorism as a political tool. Fear of
Republicanism and corporate power is what should be used instead."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "IAAH" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 08:35:06 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:CfKdnT2yr-
KyapfbnZ2dnUVZ_vninZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:A6SdnSio1uEYMZfbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:ZcudneyEW7UvEJfbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d@giganews.com:
IAAH wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:MNqdnelJYLgx6pfbnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship
was. Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get
in your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you know
so
much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the
facts have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they said' -
and you immediately jumped on one side and refused to
actually think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they* said.
I
*do* believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of
Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet, Mr.
Lying Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You know, that
thing
you have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you
conveniently ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make sure it's
more compelling than simply quoting what the Admiralty says.
Nicely poisoned well there, IAAH.
Nope, no evidence there. Shall I take it as read that you will
not
be providing any?
I'll try to contain my surprise if you actually do so.
Of course, the Admiralty *has* started releasing the
evidence that wasn't available before - meaning that
until now, you didn't actually have any.
PPpppppppPPPpPpBBBBbbbbbTTTTTTTttttttt!!!!!
Your statements were not based on facts, Fred. It's
business as usual for you.
Meaning that you've been overtaken by events, IAAH, as usual.
No, Freddy. You jumped to conclusions that have yet to
be proven
Yeah, what a leap - I assumed that the Royal Navy keeps meticulous
records. I'm really going out on a limb there.
Bub, you assumed both the British and American
administration were interested in good intelligence
about weapons in Iraq, and look where that got you.
Non-sequiturs won't change the fact that those British warships weren't
in Iranian waters, IAAH. I was right, and you were full of *****.
You were right by ACCIDENT, moron, and my claim at the
time that there was no evidence either way was exactly
correct.
Hey, all the opponents of the Iraq invasion based on no
WMD were exactly right, too! When are you going to give
them the credit you think you deserve for this one, Freddy?
Your assumptions suck. No, really. They suck out loud.
That's why I was right and you were full of *****.
See above. I made no claims. Oh, except when I said
that Iraq had no WMD even before the proof came out.
You were wrong on that one, weren't you? And on the
situation in Iraq since, and on pretty much any other
claim you've been making.
So I wouldn't get too happy about your one lucky guess,
Freddy.
You couldn't make worse assumptions if you had some
kind of nuclear-powered bad-assumption machine.
You couldn't be more wrong if you *tried* to be wrong.
You made an assumption without having evidence at the
time. That's an entirely correct claim on my part.
Congratulations! You're now 1 and (all the rest of your
claims).
1 by accident, too. Oooh, what a prognosticator you are!
You
assumed facts not in evidence like the credulous
sycophant like you are.
Since when is the Royal Navy's attention to detail not in evidence?
You assumed facts not in evidence, moron. Do I have to
explain what that means?
Actually, don't answer that. Your childishness is
boring, as usual.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
29 Mar 2007 08:23:43 AM |
|
|
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:bqWdnfR7paBWipbbnZ2dnUVZ_qSrnZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:CfKdnT2yr-
KyapfbnZ2dnUVZ_vninZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:A6SdnSio1uEYMZfbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:ZcudneyEW7UvEJfbnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d@giganews.com:
IAAH wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:MNqdnelJYLgx6pfbnZ2dnUVZ_qfinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in news:zf-
dncwzjvoWdJTbnZ2dnUVZ_tzinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:0Yidnbc9zYOhr5TbnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:7_edndLWF62oN5vbnZ2dnUVZ_o3inZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
IAAH <iaah@dodgeit.com> wrote in
news:D_2dneutHblTo5jbnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@giganews.com:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship
was. Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let
get in your way.
Why don't you give us those facts, IAAH, since you
know
so
much
more
than the British Navy.
Of course, MY point, not the lie you wrote, is that the
facts have not come out.
Of course they have, you moron.
No, they haven't. What's come out is 'We said, they said'
- and you immediately jumped on one side and refused to
actually think about what happened.
And you jumped on the other, and lapped up what *they*
said.
I
*do* believe the Royal Navy over the Iranian Ministry of
Truth.
Oh, *****. I don't believe *any* of the stories yet, Mr.
Lying Turd, because there's no *evidence*. You know, that
thing
you have never asked for or needed.
Except, of course, that there is evidence, which you
conveniently ignore, just like you always do.
Present it, then. Let's see this 'evidence', and make sure
it's more compelling than simply quoting what the Admiralty
says.
Nicely poisoned well there, IAAH.
Nope, no evidence there. Shall I take it as read that you will
not
be providing any?
I'll try to contain my surprise if you actually do so.
Of course, the Admiralty *has* started releasing the
evidence that wasn't available before - meaning that
until now, you didn't actually have any.
PPpppppppPPPpPpBBBBbbbbbTTTTTTTttttttt!!!!!
Your statements were not based on facts, Fred. It's
business as usual for you.
Meaning that you've been overtaken by events, IAAH, as usual.
No, Freddy. You jumped to conclusions that have yet to
be proven
Yeah, what a leap - I assumed that the Royal Navy keeps meticulous
records. I'm really going out on a limb there.
Bub, you assumed both the British and American
administration were interested in good intelligence
about weapons in Iraq, and look where that got you.
Non-sequiturs won't change the fact that those British warships
weren't in Iranian waters, IAAH. I was right, and you were full of
*****.
You were right by ACCIDENT, moron, and my claim at the
time that there was no evidence either way was exactly
correct.
Some accident, you blithering idiot. That evidence didn't just magically
appear when the Brits released it to the media.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"It's wrong to use fear of terrorism as a political tool. Fear of
Republicanism and corporate power is what should be used instead."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lucifer" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
24 Mar 2007 12:24:53 PM |
|
|
On Mar 24, 3:07 pm, IAAH <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
They were in Iraqi waters, by the sound of it, but belligerence and
threats probably won't get our sailors back safely.
--
Lucifer the Unsubtle, EAC Librarian of Dark Tomes of Excessive Evil
and General Purpose Igor
The Anti-Theist, BAAWA Lowly Evilmeister and tamer of the Demon Duck
of Doom
Convicted by Earthquack
"Don't worry, I won't bite.......hard"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
24 Mar 2007 03:02:41 PM |
|
|
"Lucifer" <wyrdology@hotmail.com> wrote in news:1174757093.863009.123550
@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 24, 3:07 pm, IAAH <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
They were in Iraqi waters, by the sound of it, but belligerence and
threats probably won't get our sailors back safely.
Belligerence and threats hell. Why haven't they already sunk the entire
Iranian fleet?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate for
opening up the audience." - Al Gore
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lucifer" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
24 Mar 2007 03:34:30 PM |
|
|
On Mar 24, 8:02 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Lucifer" <wyrdol...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:1174757093.863009.123550
@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 24, 3:07 pm, IAAH <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
They were in Iraqi waters, by the sound of it, but belligerence and
threats probably won't get our sailors back safely.
Belligerence and threats hell. Why haven't they already sunk the entire
Iranian fleet?
Well, I must admit I sympathise with the motives, but if we did that,
they would probably torture and kill our sailors.
--
Lucifer the Unsubtle, EAC Librarian of Dark Tomes of Excessive Evil
and General Purpose Igor
The Anti-Theist, BAAWA Lowly Evilmeister and tamer of the Demon Duck
of Doom
Convicted by Earthquack
"Don't worry, I won't bite.......hard"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
25 Mar 2007 08:44:46 AM |
|
|
"Lucifer" <wyrdology@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1174768470.114414.199170@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 24, 8:02 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Lucifer" <wyrdol...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1174757093.863009.123550 @n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 24, 3:07 pm, IAAH <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
They were in Iraqi waters, by the sound of it, but belligerence and
threats probably won't get our sailors back safely.
Belligerence and threats hell. Why haven't they already sunk the
entire Iranian fleet?
Well, I must admit I sympathise with the motives, but if we did that,
they would probably torture and kill our sailors.
They might do that anyway.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate
for opening up the audience." - Al Gore
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Corinthian Leather" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
25 Mar 2007 12:50:00 PM |
|
|
Fred Stone wrote:
"Lucifer" <wyrdology@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1174768470.114414.199170@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 24, 8:02 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Lucifer" <wyrdol...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1174757093.863009.123550 @n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 24, 3:07 pm, IAAH <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
They were in Iraqi waters, by the sound of it, but belligerence and
threats probably won't get our sailors back safely.
Belligerence and threats hell. Why haven't they already sunk the
entire Iranian fleet?
Well, I must admit I sympathise with the motives, but if we did that,
they would probably torture and kill our sailors.
They might do that anyway.
That's all the more reason for the UK *not* to antagonize the Iranians
by a reprisal strike!
RCL
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
26 Mar 2007 06:28:58 AM |
|
|
Rich Corinthian Leather <inexplicable@mysterious.net> wrote in
news:bDyNh.1385$Rg4.1104@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net:
Fred Stone wrote:
"Lucifer" <wyrdology@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1174768470.114414.199170@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 24, 8:02 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Lucifer" <wyrdol...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1174757093.863009.123550 @n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 24, 3:07 pm, IAAH <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
They were in Iraqi waters, by the sound of it, but belligerence
and threats probably won't get our sailors back safely.
Belligerence and threats hell. Why haven't they already sunk the
entire Iranian fleet?
Well, I must admit I sympathise with the motives, but if we did
that, they would probably torture and kill our sailors.
They might do that anyway.
That's all the more reason for the UK *not* to antagonize the Iranians
by a reprisal strike!
Which will just lead to more threats and more demands for concessions.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate
for opening up the audience." - Al Gore
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lucifer" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
25 Mar 2007 11:17:42 AM |
|
|
On Mar 25, 2:44 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Lucifer" <wyrdol...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:1174768470.114414.199170@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 24, 8:02 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Lucifer" <wyrdol...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1174757093.863009.123550 @n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 24, 3:07 pm, IAAH <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
They were in Iraqi waters, by the sound of it, but belligerence and
threats probably won't get our sailors back safely.
Belligerence and threats hell. Why haven't they already sunk the
entire Iranian fleet?
Well, I must admit I sympathise with the motives, but if we did that,
they would probably torture and kill our sailors.
They might do that anyway.
Yes, but if we do anything rash, they are much more likely to. The
first priority must be the welfare of British sailors.
--
Lucifer the Unsubtle, EAC Librarian of Dark Tomes of Excessive Evil
and General Purpose Igor
The Anti-Theist, BAAWA Lowly Evilmeister and tamer of the Demon Duck
of Doom
Convicted by Earthquack
"Don't worry, I won't bite.......hard"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
26 Mar 2007 06:25:59 AM |
|
|
"Lucifer" <wyrdology@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1174839462.660186.29990@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 25, 2:44 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Lucifer" <wyrdol...@hotmail.com> wrote
innews:1174768470.114414.199170@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 24, 8:02 pm, Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
"Lucifer" <wyrdol...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1174757093.863009.123550 @n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
On Mar 24, 3:07 pm, IAAH <i...@dodgeit.com> wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6484279.stm
UK sailors captured at gunpoint
They could try getting the facts, like where the ship was.
Y'know, facts. Those things that you don't let get in
your way.
They were in Iraqi waters, by the sound of it, but belligerence
and threats probably won't get our sailors back safely.
Belligerence and threats hell. Why haven't they already sunk the
entire Iranian fleet?
Well, I must admit I sympathise with the motives, but if we did
that, they would probably torture and kill our sailors.
They might do that anyway.
Yes, but if we do anything rash, they are much more likely to. The
first priority must be the welfare of British sailors.
No, the *first* priority must be the defeat of the Iranians. You're at
war with them, whether you want to admit it or not.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate
for opening up the audience." - Al Gore
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
27 Mar 2007 01:03:28 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
No, the *first* priority must be the defeat of
the Iranians. You're at war with them, whether
you want to admit it or not.
shouldn't you have said that to Bush BEFORE he
bankrupted our economy & bogged us down in Iraq?
You know, exactly the OPPOSITE of what you actually
did during the critical period before the Iraq
invasion?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
27 Mar 2007 06:27:39 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in news:1174975408.206937.45190
@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
No, the *first* priority must be the defeat of
the Iranians. You're at war with them, whether
you want to admit it or not.
shouldn't you have said that to Bush BEFORE he
bankrupted our economy & bogged us down in Iraq?
You know, exactly the OPPOSITE of what you actually
did during the critical period before the Iraq
invasion?
We were at war with Iraq then too, JTEM, you moron. "The axis of evil,
remember?"
And if you think we're all that bogged down and bankrupted, you're as
stupid as Yang.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate for
opening up the audience." - Al Gore
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 01:07:43 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
shouldn't you have said that to Bush BEFORE he
bankrupted our economy & bogged us down in Iraq?
You know, exactly the OPPOSITE of what you actually
did during the critical period before the Iraq
invasion?
We were at war with Iraq then too, JTEM, you moron.
We were at war with Iraq before we were at war with Iraq?
A certain line from 1984 seems appropriate...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: How Should Britain Respond? |
28 Mar 2007 07:44:44 AM |
|
|
"JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in news:1175062063.538117.59870
@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
shouldn't you have said that to Bush BEFORE he
bankrupted our economy & bogged us down in Iraq?
You know, exactly the OPPOSITE of what you actually
did during the critical period before the Iraq
invasion?
We were at war with Iraq then too, JTEM, you moron.
We were at war with Iraq before we were at war with Iraq?
We were at war with Iran since 1991.
A certain line from 1984 seems appropriate...
The one about how you're doubleplusungood doublethink superstupid
peoplenemy numberone jackass?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"I believe it is appropriate to have an overrepresentation of factual
presentations on how dangerous it (Global Warming) is, as a predicate
for opening up the audience." - Al Gore
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
