"hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:0020d769-abcb-422d-
934b-4ce1aae15...@c23g2000hsa.googlegroups.com:

On Jan 31, 5:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:

NPR just reported that useful detail.

I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November.
(Just my
opinion.) Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get their
stuff together.

That's the amazing thing that we're learning by watching this race
develop. That the Republicans can screw up as badly as Bush just did,
and the Dems still manage to throw away their chance at a win. I also
think that McCain will defeat Hillary.

The dumb dems haven't had a new idea since 1964, and it's become obvious
to everybody alive, except the network news that the Dems are a bigger
bunch of bigots than the people they accuse of bigotry. They're just
feminist and black Archie Bunkers.

In next November, I believe that John McCain (unless sandbagged) will
be elected our next president. I won't yet even begin to speculate on
who the VP candidate would be, but I would not rule out Joe Lieberman
(shock!).

It'll either be Romney or a conservative. Perish forbid that it might
be Huckabee, which is a terrifying thought. McCain's an old man, and
the veep is always the party nominee after an eight year presidency.

McCaine is a bit liberal for me,

Sure, but the alternative is a neo-con, none of whom are running, a
police state nutjob like Guiliani or a nutjob from the Christian right,
like Huckabee. The Republican party is filled by fascists of all
different stripe. Since Reagan opened the Pandora's Box of deficit
spending, you'll never again see a fiscal conservative emerge, in the
history of America.

Deficit spending it's the only way to win in the middle east, but in the
end, it will destroy America. Considering the debt we're all carrying,
that end may not be too far off. Look at the shenanigans the government
is pulling now, bailing out dishonest home lenders and dishonest home
buyers. Who will pick up the burden? You guessed, the ordinary
citizens, who did nothing dishonest.

But they won't pick it up in their taxes, but in the value of the
dollar. Lowering interest rates is equivalent to printing money, and
the more we print (and borrow) the farther the dollar falls.

but compared against every other of
the contenders, there is no question in my mind that he would place
our nation above himself and to a great job as president. McMaine,
unlike any other candidate has already demonstrated that he has the
"right stuff".

Well, as a soldier, he's the only one who might handle the mess in the
middle east.

Need I point out that Ms. Clinton fell on her face on Health Care
during the Clinton administration.

I've been saying this for years, but worse, she's not well bred. You'd
think that being from Wellesley, she would be, but she's not. She
hasn't got a clue about the routine businessman's task of balancing
books, and thinks that the lives of people can be improved if you hand
them free money.

That bottomless pit is just as big a black hole as the bottomless pit of
military spending and tax cuts for the rich. At least the nation gets
something in return for its military spending, and now is then we need
it. Because of her liberal principles, she thinks that killing is bad,
even to the point of being afraid to blow up Moslem training schools.

She's spineless, and she's not a leader, but just another wild spender
on social programs. We've already seen that idea is a failure.

Obama, exactly who is he?

He's black, and all his cronies are black, so what more do you need to
know? When he's elected, the blacks will descend onto Washington with
their hands out, asking for financial help getting over the tragedy of
slavery. I ask you, why is that any different from reparations? As far
as I'm concerned, we've *had* reparations, since Johnson's Great Society
started.

(Nuff
said there.) And my views about Mitt Romney are pretty negative, since
I remember him as our Massachusetts Governor (if you want me to
explain why, just ask).

I figure that Romney might not be so bad, because he's rich, and used to
handling big budgets. After all, if liberal Massachusetts can get a
Republican governor, he must have done something right.

Also, I have to ask: Why should anyone in sci.physics care who is
dropping out of the race on a daily basis?

Because Huckabee is an anti-science Christian nutjob. They figure that,
since science is too complicated for them to understand, nobody should
be allowed to understand it, and it should be taken out of the schools
and replaced with religion. Even with their bizarre golden tablets, the
Mormons still gave BYU to the world, proving that they at least respect
education.

Lets just wait and see who the real presidential candidates eventually
are.

I prefer to get involved, especially where the very existence of science
education itself is under attack.

hhc314@yahoo.com wrote:

On Jan 31, 5:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-
left.com> wrote:

NPR just reported that useful detail.

Lots of candidates are now dropping out of the race. This happens
every 4 years.
Rudy dropped out yesterday, and Edwards today. I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November. (Just my
opinion.) Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get their
stuff together.

Pffft...the Republicans don't stand a chance. once the Dems have their
love fest in August.

In next November, I believe that John McCain (unless sandbagged) will
be elected our next president. I won't yet even begin to speculate on
who the VP candidate would be, but I would not rule out Joe Lieberman
(shock!).

McCain will *never* get elected. He's too strong on Iraq. America
wants withdrawal.

McCaine is a bit liberal for me

There's a surprise. It explains how you are hopelessly deluded about
Republican chances.

On Jan 31, 6:44 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Jan 31, 5:42 pm, Agent Smith <agent-sm...@two-blocks-on-your-

left.com> wrote:

NPR just reported that useful detail.

Lots of candidates are now dropping out of the race.  This happens
every 4 years.
Rudy dropped out yesterday, and Edwards today. I don't even bother
with the Dems, because at the rate they are attacking each other,
there will be no viable democratic contender next November.  (Just my
opinion.)  Once again, the Dems just don't seem able to get their
stuff together.

Its a sad fact after the meltdown of public support for the idiot now
occupying the whitehouse a freind said, "wow the only way the
Democrats could lose this one is to run a woman or a black guy"

On Jan 31, 6:24 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:

"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."

WTC Towers 1 and 2 spring to mind. :-)

Harry C.

raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in
news:92m4q3t71them1d1a79jm5frsku0rfjvia@4ax.com:

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:42:47 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:

NPR just reported that useful detail.

Nice to know. Not that it really matters, though, he's already toast.
The races are realistically down to Clinton-Obama and McCain-Romney.
(Ron Paul supporters are encouraged to do a reality check).

It'll be interesting to see if he takes any Bible Belt states on Super
Tuesday.

raven1 wrote:

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:42:47 GMT, Agent Smith
<agent-smith@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:

NPR just reported that useful detail.

Nice to know. Not that it really matters, though, he's already toast.
The races are realistically down to Clinton-Obama and McCain-Romney.
(Ron Paul supporters are encouraged to do a reality check).

As is Ron Paul.