Humanism - The Established State Religion



 Religions > Atheism > Humanism - The Established State Religion

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "dpr why"
Date: 19 Jan 2004 03:38:16 AM
Object: Humanism - The Established State Religion
Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast
"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism, and every American
public school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic Sunday
Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a fraction of
the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic
teaching?"
Godless political forces in the United States fight tirelessly to rid the
public school system of anything that seems remotely Christian. Darwinian
evolution is now taught to the exclusion of even the scientific support for
creationism. Displays of the Ten Commandments have been ripped from the
walls, and lawsuit after lawsuit has sought to eliminate prayer, Bible
reading, and evangelism - even when those actions are thought of and
conducted by the students as opposed to the school itself. School
administrators and teachers commonly violate the constitutional rights of
Christian students (such as a private prayer, Bible reading, or organizing
Bible clubs) either because they are afraid to be sued by the litigious
unredeemed, or because they personally want to squelch Christian expression
in schools.
Christianity is kept out of the schools due to a faulty understanding of the
First Amendment's "Establishment Clause." The separationists claim that any
religion taught or tolerated within the school (except for historic
instruction) constitutes an intolerable government endorsement of religion.
They keep teachers from teaching anything about creationism - or even
pointing out the problems with evolution - for the same misguided reason: no
government endorsement of religion or religious doctrine. As creationism is
a belief held by Christians, Jews, and other religions, it must not be
allowed to be taught or tolerated within public schools. But there is a
double standard now. By doing what they have done, they have created a
public school system that actually teaches the doctrines of one religion, to
the exclusion of all others. This indeed is a violation of the First
Amendment. One single religion is preached in public schools, and no other
religion may compete with it within those walls. I refer to the religion of
humanism.
Some of you are saying, "Now wait a minute. Humanism isn't a religion!"
Oh, but it is. Let's look at some evidence that will show that not only
humanists consider humanism a religion, but the government of the United
States also recognizes it as a religion. Then we'll examine how that
religion is being taught in the schools.
There's no doubt that many humanists consider their ideology a religion.
Charles Francis Potter, signer of the Humanist Manifesto and author of
Humanism: A New Religion, wrote, "So Humanism is not simply another
denomination of Protestant Christianity; it is not a creed; nor is it a
cult. It is a new type of religion altogether."1 Potter also directed
attention to the battleground where the humanist religion dominates - the
public school system. Potter said, "Education is the most powerful ally of
Humanism, and every American public school is a school of Humanism. What
can the theistic Sunday Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and
teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day
program of humanistic teaching?"2 A former president of the American
Humanist Association, Lloyd Morain, stated, "Down through the ages men have
been seeking a universal religion or way of life.. Humanism.shows promise of
becoming a great world faith. Humanists are content with fixing their
attention on this life and on this earth. Theirs is a faith without a god,
divine revelation, or sacred scriptures. Yet theirs is a faith rich in
feeling and understanding."3 Humanist educator John Dewey, also a signer of
the Humanist Manifesto, called for a new humanist religion in his work A
Common Faith.
Humanism has also gained external recognition as a religion. Herbert
Wallace Schneider included humanism as a religion in his book, Religion in
20th Century America. Another of humanism's monikers, "Ethical Culture", is
listed as a religion in the Census of Religious Bodies published by the
United States Government. Ethical Societies have received religious tax
exemptions. But perhaps the most interesting recognition of humanism as a
religion has come from our courts. In the case Torcaso v. Watkins, the U.S.
Supreme Court stated, "Among religions in this country which do not teach
what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God are
Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism and others."4 In the
Texas Tech Law Review, an article cited several court decisions that have
referred to humanism as a religion. For example, "One Federal Court in Reed
v. Van Hoven has held that 'In light of the decided cases, the public
schools, as between theistic and humanistic religions, must carefully avoid
any program of indoctrination in ultimate values.'"5
Let us return to why this is all so important. The establishment clause of
the First Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits congress
from passing legislation concerning an establishment of religion.
Throughout the years, the courts have held that no government body can favor
one religion over another. Yet in our public schools, the doctrines and
beliefs of humanism are taught to the exclusion of any other belief. Now
that we have established, both in the minds of humanists and in our federal
courts, that humanism IS a religion, we find that the public schools are
violating the establishment clause of the First Amendment by favoring the
doctrines of humanism over other religious doctrines. A prime example is in
the presentation of the doctrine of evolution while excluding curriculum
that presents even merely the scientific evidence for divine creation.
Why then, are public schools able to get away with this obvious violation of
the constitution? I can think of at least two major reasons. The first
reason has to do with activist federal judges that believe in reinterpreting
the constitution to suit their own humanist ideologies. Our nation needs
federal judges that will rightly apply the constitution, as intended by its
framers, when humanists and atheists illegally force policy in the public
education system. Our president nominates federal judges, and our senate
confirms them. We must elect to office those candidates we feel will put
judges on the bench who understand the correct application of the
constitution.
The second reason is that humanists have worked their way into the positions
of power of our education system. The NEA and the Department of Education
are populated with humanists. Humanists also dominate state and local
boards of education. This is not simply because of the motivation of
humanists; it also indicates that Christians are not running for positions
on school boards and other education policy bodies. If every
Bible-believing church body had one or two qualified persons run for local
and state education boards, we could soon stem the tide of humanist
domination. During many elections, the school board races are often given
little attention. Yet we as Christians must be aware of who we are electing
to set policy in the education of our children. The stakes are too high.
If you are still skeptical, let me repeat Charles Francis Potter's astute
observation, "Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism, and every
American public school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic
Sunday Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a
fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of
humanistic teaching?"
NOTES:
1. Charles Francis Potter, Humanism: A New Religion (New York: Simon
and Schuster, 1930), p. 3.
2. Ibid., p. 128.
3. Lloyd Morain and Mary Morain, Humanism as the Next Step (Boston:
The Beacon Press, 1954), p. 4.
4. TORCASO v. WATKINS, 367 U.S. 488 (1961), Footnote 11.
5. John W. Whitehead and John Conlan, "The Establishment of the
Religion of Secular Humanism and Its First Amendment Implications," Texas
Tech Law Review 10 (winter 1978): 19.
--
Atheism teaches that there is no God, hence no God-given rights. That
ideology coupled with a system that believed in the superiority of the state
at the expense of the individual was murderously synergistic.
.

User: "Michael Seven"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 12:10:22 PM
<ditched all the cross-posted crap>
dpr <why> wrote in message news:100n8qg8jipn461@corp.supernews.com...

Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast

<snipped>
I really do have to wonder if these people actually want their children to
get good jobs and have a better future. I suppose it's all part of a
systematic plan to return to the Dark Ages. Welcome to the 12th^H^H^H^H21st
century.
.
User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 11:36:12 PM
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:10:22 -0500, "Michael Seven"
<technomagetimelord@yahoo.com> posted in alt.atheism:

<ditched all the cross-posted crap>
dpr <why> wrote in message news:100n8qg8jipn461@corp.supernews.com...

Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast

<snipped>
I really do have to wonder if these people actually want their children to
get good jobs and have a better future.

Yes, and they'll demand that little Johnny, who never took a biology
class because Mommy and Daddy didn't want little Johnny to be taught
'secular humanism', be admitted to medical school the same as all the
atheist kids, who don't even believe in Gawddie, which is infinitely
more important than knowing anything.
--
There are three kinds of men:
The ones that learn by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence.
- (Will Rogers)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.


User: "ZenIsWhen"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 10:31:53 AM
"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100n8qg8jipn461@corp.supernews.com...

Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast

"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism,

Oh? Then (obviously .. concluded from your post and that statement),
ignorance is the ally of organized religion.
.
User: "dpr why"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 12:04:47 PM
"ZenIsWhen" <ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> wrote in message
news:100o1jq1cfecjc4@corp.supernews.com...


"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100n8qg8jipn461@corp.supernews.com...

Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast

"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism,



Oh? Then (obviously .. concluded from your post and that statement),
ignorance is the ally of organized religion.

Seems you are the ignorant one, as you cannot refute what the article says.
Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast
"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism, and every American
public school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic Sunday
Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a fraction of
the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic
teaching?"
Godless political forces in the United States fight tirelessly to rid the
public school system of anything that seems remotely Christian. Darwinian
evolution is now taught to the exclusion of even the scientific support for
creationism. Displays of the Ten Commandments have been ripped from the
walls, and lawsuit after lawsuit has sought to eliminate prayer, Bible
reading, and evangelism - even when those actions are thought of and
conducted by the students as opposed to the school itself. School
administrators and teachers commonly violate the constitutional rights of
Christian students (such as a private prayer, Bible reading, or organizing
Bible clubs) either because they are afraid to be sued by the litigious
unredeemed, or because they personally want to squelch Christian expression
in schools.
Christianity is kept out of the schools due to a faulty understanding of the
First Amendment's "Establishment Clause." The separationists claim that any
religion taught or tolerated within the school (except for historic
instruction) constitutes an intolerable government endorsement of religion.
They keep teachers from teaching anything about creationism - or even
pointing out the problems with evolution - for the same misguided reason: no
government endorsement of religion or religious doctrine. As creationism is
a belief held by Christians, Jews, and other religions, it must not be
allowed to be taught or tolerated within public schools. But there is a
double standard now. By doing what they have done, they have created a
public school system that actually teaches the doctrines of one religion, to
the exclusion of all others. This indeed is a violation of the First
Amendment. One single religion is preached in public schools, and no other
religion may compete with it within those walls. I refer to the religion of
humanism.
Some of you are saying, "Now wait a minute. Humanism isn't a religion!"
Oh, but it is. Let's look at some evidence that will show that not only
humanists consider humanism a religion, but the government of the United
States also recognizes it as a religion. Then we'll examine how that
religion is being taught in the schools.
There's no doubt that many humanists consider their ideology a religion.
Charles Francis Potter, signer of the Humanist Manifesto and author of
Humanism: A New Religion, wrote, "So Humanism is not simply another
denomination of Protestant Christianity; it is not a creed; nor is it a
cult. It is a new type of religion altogether."1 Potter also directed
attention to the battleground where the humanist religion dominates - the
public school system. Potter said, "Education is the most powerful ally of
Humanism, and every American public school is a school of Humanism. What
can the theistic Sunday Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and
teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day
program of humanistic teaching?"2 A former president of the American
Humanist Association, Lloyd Morain, stated, "Down through the ages men have
been seeking a universal religion or way of life.. Humanism.shows promise of
becoming a great world faith. Humanists are content with fixing their
attention on this life and on this earth. Theirs is a faith without a god,
divine revelation, or sacred scriptures. Yet theirs is a faith rich in
feeling and understanding."3 Humanist educator John Dewey, also a signer of
the Humanist Manifesto, called for a new humanist religion in his work A
Common Faith.
Humanism has also gained external recognition as a religion. Herbert
Wallace Schneider included humanism as a religion in his book, Religion in
20th Century America. Another of humanism's monikers, "Ethical Culture", is
listed as a religion in the Census of Religious Bodies published by the
United States Government. Ethical Societies have received religious tax
exemptions. But perhaps the most interesting recognition of humanism as a
religion has come from our courts. In the case Torcaso v. Watkins, the U.S.
Supreme Court stated, "Among religions in this country which do not teach
what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God are
Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism and others."4 In the
Texas Tech Law Review, an article cited several court decisions that have
referred to humanism as a religion. For example, "One Federal Court in Reed
v. Van Hoven has held that 'In light of the decided cases, the public
schools, as between theistic and humanistic religions, must carefully avoid
any program of indoctrination in ultimate values.'"5
Let us return to why this is all so important. The establishment clause of
the First Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits congress
from passing legislation concerning an establishment of religion.
Throughout the years, the courts have held that no government body can favor
one religion over another. Yet in our public schools, the doctrines and
beliefs of humanism are taught to the exclusion of any other belief. Now
that we have established, both in the minds of humanists and in our federal
courts, that humanism IS a religion, we find that the public schools are
violating the establishment clause of the First Amendment by favoring the
doctrines of humanism over other religious doctrines. A prime example is in
the presentation of the doctrine of evolution while excluding curriculum
that presents even merely the scientific evidence for divine creation.
Why then, are public schools able to get away with this obvious violation of
the constitution? I can think of at least two major reasons. The first
reason has to do with activist federal judges that believe in reinterpreting
the constitution to suit their own humanist ideologies. Our nation needs
federal judges that will rightly apply the constitution, as intended by its
framers, when humanists and atheists illegally force policy in the public
education system. Our president nominates federal judges, and our senate
confirms them. We must elect to office those candidates we feel will put
judges on the bench who understand the correct application of the
constitution.
The second reason is that humanists have worked their way into the positions
of power of our education system. The NEA and the Department of Education
are populated with humanists. Humanists also dominate state and local
boards of education. This is not simply because of the motivation of
humanists; it also indicates that Christians are not running for positions
on school boards and other education policy bodies. If every
Bible-believing church body had one or two qualified persons run for local
and state education boards, we could soon stem the tide of humanist
domination. During many elections, the school board races are often given
little attention. Yet we as Christians must be aware of who we are electing
to set policy in the education of our children. The stakes are too high.
If you are still skeptical, let me repeat Charles Francis Potter's astute
observation, "Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism, and every
American public school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic
Sunday Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a
fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of
humanistic teaching?"
NOTES:
1. Charles Francis Potter, Humanism: A New Religion (New York: Simon
and Schuster, 1930), p. 3.
2. Ibid., p. 128.
3. Lloyd Morain and Mary Morain, Humanism as the Next Step (Boston:
The Beacon Press, 1954), p. 4.
4. TORCASO v. WATKINS, 367 U.S. 488 (1961), Footnote 11.
5. John W. Whitehead and John Conlan, "The Establishment of the
Religion of Secular Humanism and Its First Amendment Implications," Texas
Tech Law Review 10 (winter 1978): 19.
--
Atheism teaches that there is no God, hence no God-given rights. That
ideology coupled with a system that believed in the superiority of the state
at the expense of the individual was murderously synergistic.



.
User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 11:29:41 PM
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:04:47 -0900, "dpr" <why> posted in alt.atheism:

Seems you are the ignorant one, as you cannot refute what the article says.

"Dana is a *****-eating ignoramus."
Refute that.
--
"I am a deeply religious nonbeliever.... This is a somewhat new kind of religion."
- Letter to Hans Muehsam March 30, 1954; Einstein Archive 38-434
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
User: "dpr why"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 20 Jan 2004 12:54:01 AM
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:16fp005or86llmuphp3m1vprh1hmtigh0l@Pern.rk...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:04:47 -0900, "dpr" <why> posted in alt.atheism:

Seems you are the ignorant one, as you cannot refute what the article

says.


"Dana is a

Poor al, all he can do is program ring tones into cell phones, what a non
technical position.
.
User: "Tom"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 20 Jan 2004 08:08:02 AM
"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100pji9ohj3u73a@corp.supernews.com...

"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:16fp005or86llmuphp3m1vprh1hmtigh0l@Pern.rk...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:04:47 -0900, "dpr" <why> posted in alt.atheism:

Seems you are the ignorant one, as you cannot refute what the article

says.


"Dana is a


Dana: Poor al, all he can do is program ring tones into cell phones, what a

non

technical position.

Tom: I assume that you are not able to refute Carol's arguments as all you
are doing is making personal attacks.
.
User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 20 Jan 2004 10:31:21 PM
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:08:02 -0500, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> posted
in alt.atheism:


"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100pji9ohj3u73a@corp.supernews.com...

"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:16fp005or86llmuphp3m1vprh1hmtigh0l@Pern.rk...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:04:47 -0900, "dpr" <why> posted in alt.atheism:

Seems you are the ignorant one, as you cannot refute what the article

says.


"Dana is a


Dana: Poor al, all he can do is program ring tones into cell phones, what a

non

technical position.


Tom: I assume that you are not able to refute Carol's arguments as all you
are doing is making personal attacks.

Other than advertising for ***** to eat that's all Dana /can/ do.
--
"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid
consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and
ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who
works on the basis of reward and punishment. "
- Letter to M. Berkowitz, October 25, 1950; Einstein Archive 59-215
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.


User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 20 Jan 2004 10:30:43 PM
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:54:01 -0900, "dpr" <why> posted in alt.atheism:

"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:16fp005or86llmuphp3m1vprh1hmtigh0l@Pern.rk...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:04:47 -0900, "dpr" <why> posted in alt.atheism:

Seems you are the ignorant one, as you cannot refute what the article

says.


"Dana is a


Poor al, all he can do is program ring tones into cell phones, what a non
technical position.

Why don't you send me a resume, Dana, so I can turn you down? (I'm
looking to hire an experienced VB6/VB.Net programmer at the moment.)
--
"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic. I am convinced that a vivid
consciousness of the primary importance of moral principles for the betterment and
ennoblement of life does not need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who
works on the basis of reward and punishment. "
- Letter to M. Berkowitz, October 25, 1950; Einstein Archive 59-215
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.



User: "Carol Lee Smith"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 01:39:15 PM
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, it was written:

"ZenIsWhen" <ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> wrote in message
news:100o1jq1cfecjc4@corp.supernews.com...


"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100n8qg8jipn461@corp.supernews.com...

Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast

"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism,



Oh? Then (obviously .. concluded from your post and that statement),
ignorance is the ally of organized religion.


Seems you are the ignorant one, as you cannot refute what the article says.

That has already been done:
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:35:25 -0600
From: Carol Lee Smith <human@csd.uwm.edu>
Subject: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion
Newsgroups:
alt.atheism,alt.education,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.religion.apologetics,alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.christian.catholic,alt.religion.christianity
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, it was cut and pasted by the plagiarist Dana
Raffaniello:

Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast

<snip>

Another of humanism's monikers, "Ethical Culture", is
listed as a religion in the Census of Religious Bodies published by the
United States Government.

That is because "Ethical Culture" societies are (non-theist) religious
organizations.

Ethical Societies have received religious tax exemptions.

See above.

But perhaps the most interesting recognition of humanism as a
religion has come from our courts. In the case Torcaso v. Watkins, the

U.S.

Supreme Court stated, "Among religions in this country which do not

teach

what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God are
Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism and others."4

Neither Dana the plagiarist or Mr. Rast can read very well. They do not
know the difference between the holding of the court and footnotes, known
as "dicta." Such dicta are not part of the "decision," but are comments
intended to provide factual background to the the decision's legal
principles. Dicta have no force of law. Dicta are merely comments.
Contrast this with an actual holding, if you will (if you can follow this,
Dana), the 1994 decision in Peloza v. Capistrano School District. In that
case the issue of whether secular humanism is a religion was ACTUALLY
addressed, not just footnoted.
Peloza was a science teacher who claimed that by havinag to teach
evolution his school district was imposing on him a requirement to teach a
religion, "secular humanism." Are you with me so far?
Good.
Now here's the good part--what the court actually said:
"We reject this claim because neither the Supreme Court, nor this circuit,
has ever held that evolutionism or secular humanism are `religions' for
Establishment Clause purposes."
This was a circuit court case. Upon appeal, review was refused by the
Supremes. You do know what that means, don't you, Dana?
That refusal was a refusal to reverse a ruling that secular humanism is
not a religion.
I am sure, in the interest of intellectual honesty you will waste no time
in informing Mr. Rast that he is in error.
Meanwhile, I suggest you mend the error of your ways and stop
plagiarizing.
Proof of Dana's plagiarism: http://snipurl.com/3qrw
.
User: "dpr"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 07:58:03 PM
..
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040119133759.6369W-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, it was written:

"ZenIsWhen" <ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> wrote in message
news:100o1jq1cfecjc4@corp.supernews.com...


"dpr" <why> wrote in message

news:100n8qg8jipn461@corp.supernews.com...

Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast

"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism,



Oh? Then (obviously .. concluded from your post and that statement),
ignorance is the ally of organized religion.


Seems you are the ignorant one, as you cannot refute what the article

says.


That has already been done:

Wrong again Bigot.
So still being a leach of the taxpayers of Wisconsin, well what else would
one expect of a low life like you.
.
User: "Carol Lee Smith"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 08:18:31 PM
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, dpr wrote:

"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism,

Oh? Then (obviously .. concluded from your post and that statement),
ignorance is the ally of organized religion.

Seems you are the ignorant one, as you cannot refute what the article

says.

That has already been done:

Wrong again Bigot.

One would think you would get tired of seeing this:
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:35:25 -0600
From: Carol Lee Smith <human@csd.uwm.edu>
Subject: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion
Newsgroups:
alt.atheism,alt.education,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.religion.apologetics,alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.christian.catholic,alt.religion.christianity
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, it was cut and pasted by the plagiarist Dana
Raffaniello:

Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast

<snip>

Another of humanism's monikers, "Ethical Culture", is
listed as a religion in the Census of Religious Bodies published by the
United States Government.

That is because "Ethical Culture" societies are (non-theist) religious
organizations.

Ethical Societies have received religious tax exemptions.

See above.

But perhaps the most interesting recognition of humanism as a
religion has come from our courts. In the case Torcaso v. Watkins, the

U.S.

Supreme Court stated, "Among religions in this country which do not

teach

what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God are
Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism and others."4

Neither Dana the plagiarist or Mr. Rast can read very well. They do not
know the difference between the holding of the court and footnotes, known
as "dicta." Such dicta are not part of the "decision," but are comments
intended to provide factual background to the the decision's legal
principles. Dicta have no force of law. Dicta are merely comments.
Contrast this with an actual holding, if you will (if you can follow this,
Dana), the 1994 decision in Peloza v. Capistrano School District. In that
case the issue of whether secular humanism is a religion was ACTUALLY
addressed, not just footnoted.
Peloza was a science teacher who claimed that by havinag to teach
evolution his school district was imposing on him a requirement to teach a
religion, "secular humanism." Are you with me so far?
Good.
Now here's the good part--what the court actually said:
"We reject this claim because neither the Supreme Court, nor this circuit,
has ever held that evolutionism or secular humanism are `religions' for
Establishment Clause purposes."
This was a circuit court case. Upon appeal, review was refused by the
Supremes. You do know what that means, don't you, Dana?
That refusal was a refusal to reverse a ruling that secular humanism is
not a religion.
I am sure, in the interest of intellectual honesty you will waste no time
in informing Mr. Rast that he is in error.
Meanwhile, I suggest you mend the error of your ways and stop
plagiarizing.
Proof of Dana's plagiarism: http://snipurl.com/3qrw

So still being a leach of the taxpayers of Wisconsin, well what else would
one expect of a low life like you.

Exodus 20:16
.
User: "dpr why"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 09:11:37 PM
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040119201538.5608E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, dpr wrote:

"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism,


Oh? Then (obviously .. concluded from your post and that

statement),

ignorance is the ally of organized religion.


Seems you are the ignorant one, as you cannot refute what the

article

says.


That has already been done:


Wrong again Bigot.


One would think you would get tired of seeing this:

Carol, your misguided hate speech refutes nada.
Now go on sponge, continue being the hateful person that you are, that is
why you are a good leftist, you hate.
It is such a shame that society has to support such a hateful person as
yourself. The taxes the people of Wisconsin pay can sure be used for better
uses than to support people like you.
.
User: "Tom"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 20 Jan 2004 08:06:08 AM
"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100p6hepdrj5831@corp.supernews.com...

"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040119201538.5608E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, dpr wrote:

"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism,


Oh? Then (obviously .. concluded from your post and that

statement),

ignorance is the ally of organized religion.


Seems you are the ignorant one, as you cannot refute what the

article

says.


That has already been done:


Wrong again Bigot.


One would think you would get tired of seeing this:


Carol, your misguided hate speech refutes nada.
Now go on sponge, continue being the hateful person that you are, that is
why you are a good leftist, you hate.
It is such a shame that society has to support such a hateful person as
yourself. The taxes the people of Wisconsin pay can sure be used for

better

uses than to support people like you.

Tom: It surely refuted the argument the you presented. If you think it
didn't you can counter her statements instead of making a personal attack.
From what I read you are going to have a difficult time refuting her
arguments.
.

User: "Carol Lee Smith"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 09:52:35 PM
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, it was written by the ranting and raving plagiarist,
none other that Dana P. Raffaniello:

"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040119201538.5608E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, dpr wrote:

"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism,

Oh? Then (obviously .. concluded from your post and that

statement),

ignorance is the ally of organized religion.

Seems you are the ignorant one, as you cannot refute what the

article says.

That has already been done:

Wrong again Bigot.

One would think you would get tired of seeing this:

It's below, Dana.

Carol, your misguided hate speech refutes nada.

Examples of "hate speech"
go here---->>
and be sure to include the examples of your own hate speech.

Now go on sponge, continue being the hateful person that you are, that is
why you are a good leftist, you hate.
It is such a shame that society has to support such a hateful person as
yourself. The taxes the people of Wisconsin pay can sure be used for better
uses than to support people like you.

You have it backwards, Dana. The taxes don't support me. I support the
taxes. Quite generously, I would add.
.
User: "dpr why"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 10:54:07 PM
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040119214301.5608J-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, it was written by the ranting and raving plagiarist,
none other that Dana P. Raffaniello:

"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040119201538.5608E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...


On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, dpr wrote:


"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism,


Oh? Then (obviously .. concluded from your post and that

statement),

ignorance is the ally of organized religion.


Seems you are the ignorant one, as you cannot refute what the

article says.


That has already been done:


Wrong again Bigot.

It's below, Dana.

Carol, your misguided hate speech refutes nada.

One would think you would get tired of seeing this:

and be sure to include the examples of your own hate speech.


Now go on sponge, continue being the hateful person that you are, that

is

why you are a good leftist, you hate.
It is such a shame that society has to support such a hateful person as
yourself. The taxes the people of Wisconsin pay can sure be used for

better

uses than to support people like you.

.








User: ""

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established (true) Google archives 19 Jan 2004 09:22:28 AM
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:09:58 -0900, "dpr" <why> wrote:
---------------------------------------------------

ladies use my tongue for your pleasure
</groups?q=author:danaraffaniello%40worldnet.
att.net&start=210&hl=en&lr=&ie=UT>F-8&selm=
63j187%24nji%40bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net&rnum=226>
swm very oral will orally worship any female that wishes to be worshipped.
will kiss and lick your feet and butt .
might be wiling to be your toilet paper if you
are that aggressive

.

User: "Carol Lee Smith"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 11:35:25 AM
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, it was cut and pasted by the plagiarist Dana
Raffaniello:

Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast

<snip>

Another of humanism's monikers, "Ethical Culture", is
listed as a religion in the Census of Religious Bodies published by the
United States Government.

That is because "Ethical Culture" societies are (non-theist) religious
organizations.

Ethical Societies have received religious tax exemptions.

See above.

But perhaps the most interesting recognition of humanism as a
religion has come from our courts. In the case Torcaso v. Watkins, the U.S.
Supreme Court stated, "Among religions in this country which do not teach
what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God are
Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism and others."4

Neither Dana the plagiarist or Mr. Rast can read very well. They do not
know the difference between the holding of the court and footnotes, known
as "dicta." Such dicta are not part of the "decision," but are comments
intended to provide factual background to the the decision's legal
principles. Dicta have no force of law. Dicta are merely comments.
Contrast this with an actual holding, if you will (if you can follow this,
Dana), the 1994 decision in Peloza v. Capistrano School District. In that
case the issue of whether secular humanism is a religion was ACTUALLY
addressed, not just footnoted.
Peloza was a science teacher who claimed that by havinag to teach
evolution his school district was imposing on him a requirement to teach a
religion, "secular humanism." Are you with me so far?
Good.
Now here's the good part--what the court actually said:
"We reject this claim because neither the Supreme Court, nor this circuit,
has ever held that evolutionism or secular humanism are `religions' for
Establishment Clause purposes."
This was a circuit court case. Upon appeal, review was refused by the
Supremes. You do know what that means, don't you, Dana?
That refusal was a refusal to reverse a ruling that secular humanism is
not a religion.
I am sure, in the interest of intellectual honesty you will waste no time
in informing Mr. Rast that he is in error.
Meanwhile, I suggest you mend the error of your ways and stop
plagiarizing.
Proof of Dana's plagiarism: http://snipurl.com/3qrw
.
User: "dpr why"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 12:05:24 PM
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040119111244.6369E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast
"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism, and every American
public school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic Sunday
Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a fraction of
the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic
teaching?"
Godless political forces in the United States fight tirelessly to rid the
public school system of anything that seems remotely Christian. Darwinian
evolution is now taught to the exclusion of even the scientific support for
creationism. Displays of the Ten Commandments have been ripped from the
walls, and lawsuit after lawsuit has sought to eliminate prayer, Bible
reading, and evangelism - even when those actions are thought of and
conducted by the students as opposed to the school itself. School
administrators and teachers commonly violate the constitutional rights of
Christian students (such as a private prayer, Bible reading, or organizing
Bible clubs) either because they are afraid to be sued by the litigious
unredeemed, or because they personally want to squelch Christian expression
in schools.
Christianity is kept out of the schools due to a faulty understanding of the
First Amendment's "Establishment Clause." The separationists claim that any
religion taught or tolerated within the school (except for historic
instruction) constitutes an intolerable government endorsement of religion.
They keep teachers from teaching anything about creationism - or even
pointing out the problems with evolution - for the same misguided reason: no
government endorsement of religion or religious doctrine. As creationism is
a belief held by Christians, Jews, and other religions, it must not be
allowed to be taught or tolerated within public schools. But there is a
double standard now. By doing what they have done, they have created a
public school system that actually teaches the doctrines of one religion, to
the exclusion of all others. This indeed is a violation of the First
Amendment. One single religion is preached in public schools, and no other
religion may compete with it within those walls. I refer to the religion of
humanism.
Some of you are saying, "Now wait a minute. Humanism isn't a religion!"
Oh, but it is. Let's look at some evidence that will show that not only
humanists consider humanism a religion, but the government of the United
States also recognizes it as a religion. Then we'll examine how that
religion is being taught in the schools.
There's no doubt that many humanists consider their ideology a religion.
Charles Francis Potter, signer of the Humanist Manifesto and author of
Humanism: A New Religion, wrote, "So Humanism is not simply another
denomination of Protestant Christianity; it is not a creed; nor is it a
cult. It is a new type of religion altogether."1 Potter also directed
attention to the battleground where the humanist religion dominates - the
public school system. Potter said, "Education is the most powerful ally of
Humanism, and every American public school is a school of Humanism. What
can the theistic Sunday Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and
teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day
program of humanistic teaching?"2 A former president of the American
Humanist Association, Lloyd Morain, stated, "Down through the ages men have
been seeking a universal religion or way of life.. Humanism.shows promise of
becoming a great world faith. Humanists are content with fixing their
attention on this life and on this earth. Theirs is a faith without a god,
divine revelation, or sacred scriptures. Yet theirs is a faith rich in
feeling and understanding."3 Humanist educator John Dewey, also a signer of
the Humanist Manifesto, called for a new humanist religion in his work A
Common Faith.
Humanism has also gained external recognition as a religion. Herbert
Wallace Schneider included humanism as a religion in his book, Religion in
20th Century America. Another of humanism's monikers, "Ethical Culture", is
listed as a religion in the Census of Religious Bodies published by the
United States Government. Ethical Societies have received religious tax
exemptions. But perhaps the most interesting recognition of humanism as a
religion has come from our courts. In the case Torcaso v. Watkins, the U.S.
Supreme Court stated, "Among religions in this country which do not teach
what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God are
Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism and others."4 In the
Texas Tech Law Review, an article cited several court decisions that have
referred to humanism as a religion. For example, "One Federal Court in Reed
v. Van Hoven has held that 'In light of the decided cases, the public
schools, as between theistic and humanistic religions, must carefully avoid
any program of indoctrination in ultimate values.'"5
Let us return to why this is all so important. The establishment clause of
the First Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits congress
from passing legislation concerning an establishment of religion.
Throughout the years, the courts have held that no government body can favor
one religion over another. Yet in our public schools, the doctrines and
beliefs of humanism are taught to the exclusion of any other belief. Now
that we have established, both in the minds of humanists and in our federal
courts, that humanism IS a religion, we find that the public schools are
violating the establishment clause of the First Amendment by favoring the
doctrines of humanism over other religious doctrines. A prime example is in
the presentation of the doctrine of evolution while excluding curriculum
that presents even merely the scientific evidence for divine creation.
Why then, are public schools able to get away with this obvious violation of
the constitution? I can think of at least two major reasons. The first
reason has to do with activist federal judges that believe in reinterpreting
the constitution to suit their own humanist ideologies. Our nation needs
federal judges that will rightly apply the constitution, as intended by its
framers, when humanists and atheists illegally force policy in the public
education system. Our president nominates federal judges, and our senate
confirms them. We must elect to office those candidates we feel will put
judges on the bench who understand the correct application of the
constitution.
The second reason is that humanists have worked their way into the positions
of power of our education system. The NEA and the Department of Education
are populated with humanists. Humanists also dominate state and local
boards of education. This is not simply because of the motivation of
humanists; it also indicates that Christians are not running for positions
on school boards and other education policy bodies. If every
Bible-believing church body had one or two qualified persons run for local
and state education boards, we could soon stem the tide of humanist
domination. During many elections, the school board races are often given
little attention. Yet we as Christians must be aware of who we are electing
to set policy in the education of our children. The stakes are too high.
If you are still skeptical, let me repeat Charles Francis Potter's astute
observation, "Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism, and every
American public school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic
Sunday Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a
fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of
humanistic teaching?"
NOTES:
1. Charles Francis Potter, Humanism: A New Religion (New York: Simon
and Schuster, 1930), p. 3.
2. Ibid., p. 128.
3. Lloyd Morain and Mary Morain, Humanism as the Next Step (Boston:
The Beacon Press, 1954), p. 4.
4. TORCASO v. WATKINS, 367 U.S. 488 (1961), Footnote 11.
5. John W. Whitehead and John Conlan, "The Establishment of the
Religion of Secular Humanism and Its First Amendment Implications," Texas
Tech Law Review 10 (winter 1978): 19.
--
Atheism teaches that there is no God, hence no God-given rights. That
ideology coupled with a system that believed in the superiority of the state
at the expense of the individual was murderously synergistic.
.
User: "ZenIsWhen"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 03:55:09 PM
"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100o6h89ra25nd6@corp.supernews.com...
Is that all you do .. post fantically insane and biased vrap?

Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast

"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism, and every American
public school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic Sunday
Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a fraction of
the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic
teaching?"

Godless political forces in the United States fight tirelessly to rid the
public school system of anything that seems remotely Christian. Darwinian
evolution is now taught to the exclusion of even the scientific support

for

creationism. Displays of the Ten Commandments have been ripped from the
walls, and lawsuit after lawsuit has sought to eliminate prayer, Bible
reading, and evangelism - even when those actions are thought of and
conducted by the students as opposed to the school itself. School
administrators and teachers commonly violate the constitutional rights of
Christian students (such as a private prayer, Bible reading, or organizing
Bible clubs) either because they are afraid to be sued by the litigious
unredeemed, or because they personally want to squelch Christian

expression

in schools.
Christianity is kept out of the schools due to a faulty understanding of

the

First Amendment's "Establishment Clause." The separationists claim that

any

religion taught or tolerated within the school (except for historic
instruction) constitutes an intolerable government endorsement of

religion.

They keep teachers from teaching anything about creationism - or even
pointing out the problems with evolution - for the same misguided reason:

no

government endorsement of religion or religious doctrine. As creationism

is

a belief held by Christians, Jews, and other religions, it must not be
allowed to be taught or tolerated within public schools. But there is a
double standard now. By doing what they have done, they have created a
public school system that actually teaches the doctrines of one religion,

to

the exclusion of all others. This indeed is a violation of the First
Amendment. One single religion is preached in public schools, and no

other

religion may compete with it within those walls. I refer to the religion

of

humanism.
Some of you are saying, "Now wait a minute. Humanism isn't a religion!"
Oh, but it is. Let's look at some evidence that will show that not only
humanists consider humanism a religion, but the government of the United
States also recognizes it as a religion. Then we'll examine how that
religion is being taught in the schools.
There's no doubt that many humanists consider their ideology a religion.
Charles Francis Potter, signer of the Humanist Manifesto and author of
Humanism: A New Religion, wrote, "So Humanism is not simply another
denomination of Protestant Christianity; it is not a creed; nor is it a
cult. It is a new type of religion altogether."1 Potter also directed
attention to the battleground where the humanist religion dominates - the
public school system. Potter said, "Education is the most powerful ally

of

Humanism, and every American public school is a school of Humanism. What
can the theistic Sunday Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and
teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a

five-day

program of humanistic teaching?"2 A former president of the American
Humanist Association, Lloyd Morain, stated, "Down through the ages men

have

been seeking a universal religion or way of life.. Humanism.shows promise

of

becoming a great world faith. Humanists are content with fixing their
attention on this life and on this earth. Theirs is a faith without a

god,

divine revelation, or sacred scriptures. Yet theirs is a faith rich in
feeling and understanding."3 Humanist educator John Dewey, also a signer

of

the Humanist Manifesto, called for a new humanist religion in his work A
Common Faith.
Humanism has also gained external recognition as a religion. Herbert
Wallace Schneider included humanism as a religion in his book, Religion in
20th Century America. Another of humanism's monikers, "Ethical Culture",

is

listed as a religion in the Census of Religious Bodies published by the
United States Government. Ethical Societies have received religious tax
exemptions. But perhaps the most interesting recognition of humanism as a
religion has come from our courts. In the case Torcaso v. Watkins, the

U.S.

Supreme Court stated, "Among religions in this country which do not teach
what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God are
Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism and others."4 In the
Texas Tech Law Review, an article cited several court decisions that have
referred to humanism as a religion. For example, "One Federal Court in

Reed

v. Van Hoven has held that 'In light of the decided cases, the public
schools, as between theistic and humanistic religions, must carefully

avoid

any program of indoctrination in ultimate values.'"5
Let us return to why this is all so important. The establishment clause

of

the First Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits congress
from passing legislation concerning an establishment of religion.
Throughout the years, the courts have held that no government body can

favor

one religion over another. Yet in our public schools, the doctrines and
beliefs of humanism are taught to the exclusion of any other belief. Now
that we have established, both in the minds of humanists and in our

federal

courts, that humanism IS a religion, we find that the public schools are
violating the establishment clause of the First Amendment by favoring the
doctrines of humanism over other religious doctrines. A prime example is

in

the presentation of the doctrine of evolution while excluding curriculum
that presents even merely the scientific evidence for divine creation.
Why then, are public schools able to get away with this obvious violation

of

the constitution? I can think of at least two major reasons. The first
reason has to do with activist federal judges that believe in

reinterpreting

the constitution to suit their own humanist ideologies. Our nation needs
federal judges that will rightly apply the constitution, as intended by

its

framers, when humanists and atheists illegally force policy in the public
education system. Our president nominates federal judges, and our senate
confirms them. We must elect to office those candidates we feel will put
judges on the bench who understand the correct application of the
constitution.
The second reason is that humanists have worked their way into the

positions

of power of our education system. The NEA and the Department of Education
are populated with humanists. Humanists also dominate state and local
boards of education. This is not simply because of the motivation of
humanists; it also indicates that Christians are not running for positions
on school boards and other education policy bodies. If every
Bible-believing church body had one or two qualified persons run for local
and state education boards, we could soon stem the tide of humanist
domination. During many elections, the school board races are often given
little attention. Yet we as Christians must be aware of who we are

electing

to set policy in the education of our children. The stakes are too high.
If you are still skeptical, let me repeat Charles Francis Potter's astute
observation, "Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism, and every
American public school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic
Sunday Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a
fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of
humanistic teaching?"

NOTES:
1. Charles Francis Potter, Humanism: A New Religion (New York:

Simon

and Schuster, 1930), p. 3.
2. Ibid., p. 128.
3. Lloyd Morain and Mary Morain, Humanism as the Next Step (Boston:
The Beacon Press, 1954), p. 4.
4. TORCASO v. WATKINS, 367 U.S. 488 (1961), Footnote 11.
5. John W. Whitehead and John Conlan, "The Establishment of the
Religion of Secular Humanism and Its First Amendment Implications," Texas
Tech Law Review 10 (winter 1978): 19.



--
Atheism teaches that there is no God, hence no God-given rights.

Atheism is a belief; it "teaches" nothing.
You can only prove there are god given rights AFTER you prove there is a god
(your god)!
Neither you nor anyone who has ever come before you has been able to dothat!
That

ideology coupled with a system that believed in the superiority of the

state

at the expense of the individual was murderously synergistic.

Your concept of "rights" is so warped you have no idea what you are talking
about ... which is not news to anyone.
BTW.. Claiming that atheists "believed in the superiority of the state at
the expense of the individual........." is nothing more than your usual
ignorant fraud!
.
User: "dpr"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 07:55:08 PM
"ZenIsWhen" <ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> wrote in message
news:100oki4g531qef1@corp.supernews.com...


"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100o6h89ra25nd6@corp.supernews.com...

Is that all you do .. post fantically insane and biased vrap?

Is that the best your bigoted biased self can manage. So much for you being
capable of free thought.


Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast

"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism, and every American
public school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic Sunday
Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a fraction

of

the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic
teaching?"

Godless political forces in the United States fight tirelessly to rid

the

public school system of anything that seems remotely Christian.

Darwinian

evolution is now taught to the exclusion of even the scientific support

for

creationism. Displays of the Ten Commandments have been ripped from the
walls, and lawsuit after lawsuit has sought to eliminate prayer, Bible
reading, and evangelism - even when those actions are thought of and
conducted by the students as opposed to the school itself. School
administrators and teachers commonly violate the constitutional rights

of

Christian students (such as a private prayer, Bible reading, or

organizing

Bible clubs) either because they are afraid to be sued by the litigious
unredeemed, or because they personally want to squelch Christian

expression

in schools.
Christianity is kept out of the schools due to a faulty understanding of

the

First Amendment's "Establishment Clause." The separationists claim that

any

religion taught or tolerated within the school (except for historic
instruction) constitutes an intolerable government endorsement of

religion.

They keep teachers from teaching anything about creationism - or even
pointing out the problems with evolution - for the same misguided

reason:

no

government endorsement of religion or religious doctrine. As

creationism

is

a belief held by Christians, Jews, and other religions, it must not be
allowed to be taught or tolerated within public schools. But there is a
double standard now. By doing what they have done, they have created a
public school system that actually teaches the doctrines of one

religion,

to

the exclusion of all others. This indeed is a violation of the First
Amendment. One single religion is preached in public schools, and no

other

religion may compete with it within those walls. I refer to the

religion

of

humanism.
Some of you are saying, "Now wait a minute. Humanism isn't a religion!"
Oh, but it is. Let's look at some evidence that will show that not only
humanists consider humanism a religion, but the government of the United
States also recognizes it as a religion. Then we'll examine how that
religion is being taught in the schools.
There's no doubt that many humanists consider their ideology a religion.
Charles Francis Potter, signer of the Humanist Manifesto and author of
Humanism: A New Religion, wrote, "So Humanism is not simply another
denomination of Protestant Christianity; it is not a creed; nor is it a
cult. It is a new type of religion altogether."1 Potter also directed
attention to the battleground where the humanist religion dominates -

the

public school system. Potter said, "Education is the most powerful ally

of

Humanism, and every American public school is a school of Humanism.

What

can the theistic Sunday Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and
teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a

five-day

program of humanistic teaching?"2 A former president of the American
Humanist Association, Lloyd Morain, stated, "Down through the ages men

have

been seeking a universal religion or way of life.. Humanism.shows

promise

of

becoming a great world faith. Humanists are content with fixing their
attention on this life and on this earth. Theirs is a faith without a

god,

divine revelation, or sacred scriptures. Yet theirs is a faith rich in
feeling and understanding."3 Humanist educator John Dewey, also a signer

of

the Humanist Manifesto, called for a new humanist religion in his work A
Common Faith.
Humanism has also gained external recognition as a religion. Herbert
Wallace Schneider included humanism as a religion in his book, Religion

in

20th Century America. Another of humanism's monikers, "Ethical

Culture",

is

listed as a religion in the Census of Religious Bodies published by the
United States Government. Ethical Societies have received religious tax
exemptions. But perhaps the most interesting recognition of humanism as

a

religion has come from our courts. In the case Torcaso v. Watkins, the

U.S.

Supreme Court stated, "Among religions in this country which do not

teach

what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God are
Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism and others."4 In

the

Texas Tech Law Review, an article cited several court decisions that

have

referred to humanism as a religion. For example, "One Federal Court in

Reed

v. Van Hoven has held that 'In light of the decided cases, the public
schools, as between theistic and humanistic religions, must carefully

avoid

any program of indoctrination in ultimate values.'"5
Let us return to why this is all so important. The establishment clause

of

the First Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits congress
from passing legislation concerning an establishment of religion.
Throughout the years, the courts have held that no government body can

favor

one religion over another. Yet in our public schools, the doctrines and
beliefs of humanism are taught to the exclusion of any other belief.

Now

that we have established, both in the minds of humanists and in our

federal

courts, that humanism IS a religion, we find that the public schools are
violating the establishment clause of the First Amendment by favoring

the

doctrines of humanism over other religious doctrines. A prime example

is

in

the presentation of the doctrine of evolution while excluding curriculum
that presents even merely the scientific evidence for divine creation.
Why then, are public schools able to get away with this obvious

violation

of

the constitution? I can think of at least two major reasons. The first
reason has to do with activist federal judges that believe in

reinterpreting

the constitution to suit their own humanist ideologies. Our nation

needs

federal judges that will rightly apply the constitution, as intended by

its

framers, when humanists and atheists illegally force policy in the

public

education system. Our president nominates federal judges, and our

senate

confirms them. We must elect to office those candidates we feel will

put

judges on the bench who understand the correct application of the
constitution.
The second reason is that humanists have worked their way into the

positions

of power of our education system. The NEA and the Department of

Education

are populated with humanists. Humanists also dominate state and local
boards of education. This is not simply because of the motivation of
humanists; it also indicates that Christians are not running for

positions

on school boards and other education policy bodies. If every
Bible-believing church body had one or two qualified persons run for

local

and state education boards, we could soon stem the tide of humanist
domination. During many elections, the school board races are often

given

little attention. Yet we as Christians must be aware of who we are

electing

to set policy in the education of our children. The stakes are too

high.

If you are still skeptical, let me repeat Charles Francis Potter's

astute

observation, "Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism, and every
American public school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic
Sunday Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a
fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of
humanistic teaching?"

NOTES:
1. Charles Francis Potter, Humanism: A New Religion (New York:

Simon

and Schuster, 1930), p. 3.
2. Ibid., p. 128.
3. Lloyd Morain and Mary Morain, Humanism as the Next Step

(Boston:

The Beacon Press, 1954), p. 4.
4. TORCASO v. WATKINS, 367 U.S. 488 (1961), Footnote 11.
5. John W. Whitehead and John Conlan, "The Establishment of the
Religion of Secular Humanism and Its First Amendment Implications,"

Texas

Tech Law Review 10 (winter 1978): 19.



--
Atheism teaches that there is no God, hence no God-given rights.


Atheism is a belief; it "teaches" nothing.

You can only prove there are god given rights AFTER you prove there is a

god

(your god)!
Neither you nor anyone who has ever come before you has been able to

dothat!



That

ideology coupled with a system that believed in the superiority of the

state

at the expense of the individual was murderously synergistic.


Your concept of "rights" is so warped you have no idea what you are

talking

about ... which is not news to anyone.

BTW.. Claiming that atheists "believed in the superiority of the state at
the expense of the individual

They do not only believe that, they practice that very practice.
Which is why we need to fight against the atheist left socialists in this
country.
.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 11:33:33 PM
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:55:09 -0500, "ZenIsWhen"
<ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> posted in alt.atheism:

"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100o6h89ra25nd6@corp.supernews.com...
Is that all you do .. post fantically insane and biased vrap?

That, post ad hom attacks and call people names.
Oh, and post requests to be shat upon.
--
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your
Christ."
- Mohandas Gandhi
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
User: "dpr why"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 20 Jan 2004 12:55:36 AM
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:hcfp00h53ih4ts3e58v3s2ndlto1nb3c3k@Pern.rk...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:55:09 -0500, "ZenIsWhen"
<ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> posted in alt.atheism:

"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100o6h89ra25nd6@corp.supernews.com...


Is that all you do .. post fantically insane and biased vrap?


That, post ad hom attacks and call people names.

Stop doing your mom, incest is not good.
.
User: "Tom"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 20 Jan 2004 08:27:44 AM
"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100pjlba0vr0656@corp.supernews.com...

"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:hcfp00h53ih4ts3e58v3s2ndlto1nb3c3k@Pern.rk...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:55:09 -0500, "ZenIsWhen"
<ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> posted in alt.atheism:

"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100o6h89ra25nd6@corp.supernews.com...


Is that all you do .. post fantically insane and biased vrap?


That, post ad hom attacks and call people names.


Dana: Stop doing your mom, incest is not good.

Tom: Totally uncalled for and you call yourself a Christian? Boy, if you are
the best Christianity has to offer I'm really happy to be an atheist.
.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 20 Jan 2004 10:34:35 PM
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:55:36 -0900, "dpr" <why> posted in alt.atheism:

"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:hcfp00h53ih4ts3e58v3s2ndlto1nb3c3k@Pern.rk...

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:55:09 -0500, "ZenIsWhen"
<ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> posted in alt.atheism:

"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100o6h89ra25nd6@corp.supernews.com...


Is that all you do .. post fantically insane and biased vrap?


That, post ad hom attacks and call people names.


Stop doing your mom, incest is not good.

I'll forgive you for accusing me of necrophilia, Dana - I never get
angry with the mentally challenged.
--
"I don't try to imagine a God; it suffices to stand in awe of the structure of the world
insofar as it allows our inadequate senses to appreciate it."
- Letter to S. Flesch, April 16, 1954; Einstein Archive 30-1154
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.



User: "Carol Lee Smith"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 04:30:10 PM
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, ZenIsWhen wrote:

"dpr" <why> wrote in message news:100o6h89ra25nd6@corp.supernews.com...
Is that all you do .. post fantically insane and biased vrap?

And inaccurate. Don't forget inaccurate.

Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast

<snip "vrap" whatever that is>
-----------------------
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:35:25 -0600
From: Carol Lee Smith <human@csd.uwm.edu>
Subject: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion
Newsgroups:
alt.atheism,alt.education,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.religion.apologetics,alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.christian.catholic,alt.religion.christianity
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, it was cut and pasted by the plagiarist Dana
Raffaniello:

Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast

<snip>

Another of humanism's monikers, "Ethical Culture", is
listed as a religion in the Census of Religious Bodies published by the
United States Government.

That is because "Ethical Culture" societies are (non-theist) religious
organizations.

Ethical Societies have received religious tax exemptions.

See above.

But perhaps the most interesting recognition of humanism as a
religion has come from our courts. In the case Torcaso v. Watkins, the

U.S.

Supreme Court stated, "Among religions in this country which do not

teach

what would generally be considered a belief in the existence of God are
Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism and others."4

Neither Dana the plagiarist or Mr. Rast can read very well. They do not
know the difference between the holding of the court and footnotes, known
as "dicta." Such dicta are not part of the "decision," but are comments
intended to provide factual background to the the decision's legal
principles. Dicta have no force of law. Dicta are merely comments.
Contrast this with an actual holding, if you will (if you can follow this,
Dana), the 1994 decision in Peloza v. Capistrano School District. In that
case the issue of whether secular humanism is a religion was ACTUALLY
addressed, not just footnoted.
Peloza was a science teacher who claimed that by havinag to teach
evolution his school district was imposing on him a requirement to teach a
religion, "secular humanism." Are you with me so far?
Good.
Now here's the good part--what the court actually said:
"We reject this claim because neither the Supreme Court, nor this circuit,
has ever held that evolutionism or secular humanism are `religions' for
Establishment Clause purposes."
This was a circuit court case. Upon appeal, review was refused by the
Supremes. You do know what that means, don't you, Dana?
That refusal was a refusal to reverse a ruling that secular humanism is
not a religion.
I am sure, in the interest of intellectual honesty you will waste no time
in informing Mr. Rast that he is in error.
Meanwhile, I suggest you mend the error of your ways and stop
plagiarizing.
Proof of Dana's plagiarism: http://snipurl.com/3qrw
.
User: "dpr"

Title: Re: Humanism - The Established State Religion 19 Jan 2004 07:55:41 PM
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040119162827.12016A-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040119111244.6369E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Humanism - The Established State Religion
Ben Rast
"Education is the most powerful ally of Humanism, and every American
public school is a school of Humanism. What can the theistic Sunday
Schools, meeting for an hour once a week, and teaching only a fraction of
the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic
teaching?"
Godless political forces in the United States fight tirelessly to rid the
public school system of anything that seems remotely Christian. Darwinian
evolution is now taught to the exclusion of even the scientific support for
creationism. Displays of the Ten Commandments have been ripped from the
walls, and lawsuit after lawsuit has sought to eliminate prayer, Bible
reading, and evangelism - even when those actions are thought of and
conducted by the students as opposed to the school itself. School
administrators and teache