| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Truth Hunter" |
| Date: |
27 Apr 2004 08:29:10 PM |
| Object: |
I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
I don't think Jesus was omnipresent while he was on earth as a man.
There is more to being a man than just having arms an legs. Man is not
omnipresent. Man is forced to take one day at a time. An omnipresent
being is not a man, wheter or not he has the arms and legs of a man.
http://www.jewsforjudaism.org
.
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
28 Apr 2004 06:58:17 AM |
|
|
On 27 Apr 2004 18:29:10 -0700 in
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, Truth Hunter
(hunter77099@yahoo.com (Truth Hunter)) said, directing the reply to
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
I don't think Jesus was omnipresent while he was on earth as a man.
There is more to being a man than just having arms an legs. Man is not
omnipresent. Man is forced to take one day at a time. An omnipresent
being is not a man, wheter or not he has the arms and legs of a man.
Interesting point. It's not so much that there's "more to being a man
than just having arms an legs," but rather what it means to be fully
human: perhaps some would agree that in some sense being "fully human"
entails limitation.
--
"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."
- Attrib: Pauline Reage.
Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion?
See: <http://www.Video2CD.com>. 35.00 gets your video on DVD.
all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read.
** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Intasharib" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
29 Apr 2004 05:33:09 PM |
|
|
(Truth Hunter) wrote in message news:<e164e783.0404271729.7d97880b@posting.google.com>...
http://www.jewsforjudaism.org
Our "Truth Hunter" suddenly changes his byline to "Jews For Judaism."
Why the sudden change? Interesting that this group, Jews for Judaism,
has criticised Messianic Jews for their "deception" of "stealth
evangalism" - but it seems old Hunter is as stealthy as anyone else!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Truth Hunter" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
30 Apr 2004 06:49:24 PM |
|
|
If Jesus was a man and to be a man you cannot be omnipresent,
omnibenevolent, all-knowing or omnipotent then Jesus was not God as he
does not possess the qualities God supposedly has.
If Jesus was God he cannot have some of the human limitations you
mentioned. e.g. if he was all-knowing he would not forget.
Yet the bible says he was both fully man and fully God. This cannot be
true unless you redefine man or God.
I doubt you'll ever find a Christian who can explain the trinity
coherently.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Intasharib" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
04 May 2004 12:24:03 AM |
|
|
(Truth Hunter) wrote in message news:<e164e783.0404301549.470aa40@posting.google.com>...
If Jesus was a man and to be a man you cannot be omnipresent,
omnibenevolent, all-knowing or omnipotent then Jesus was not God as he
does not possess the qualities God supposedly has.
If Jesus was God he cannot have some of the human limitations you
mentioned. e.g. if he was all-knowing he would not forget.
Yet the bible says he was both fully man and fully God. This cannot be
true unless you redefine man or God.
I doubt you'll ever find a Christian who can explain the trinity
coherently.
Well, can you explain coherently why God ate a non-kosher meal with
Abraham in Genesis 18:8?
Can you explain coherently why in verse 9 the all-knowing God didn't
seem to know where Sarah was?
Can you explain coherently why in verse 13 God didn't seem to know why
Sarah laughed, nor seemed to recounted accurately what she said?
Can you explain coherently why in verse 21 it seemed that God had to
go see for himself what was happening in Sodom to find out if it was
true or not?
Can you explain coherently why in verse 33 an omnipresent God
apparently "went his way" after communing with Abraham?
After this explain coherenly why Jews do not believe in 2 Gods since
God and the Spirit of God are distinguished throughout the Old
Testament. And if you can rationalize God and God's Spirit being One
and the same, yet mysteriously distinct, then why is the extension of
this from two to three such a difficulty for you?
In other words, you cannot explain any of the mysteries of God that
you currently accept from his word, nor explain why he has done the
things he has done.
So how can anyone explain Jesus Christ, the Son of God and the Saviour
of the World?!
All I can say is that he has opened the eyes of the blind, raised the
dead, walked on water, and rose from the dead and accended before
witnesses into heaven. Who else do you think does such things?
The sons of Jacob rejected Joseph, the children of Israel rejected
Moses, the Jews rejected Samuel from ruling over them also, and they
rejected and killed their prophets, and in the fullness of time they
finally rejected Jesus Christ -a descendant of David, and the Lion of
the Tribe of Judah.
But God meant it that many would be saved by a great deliverance.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
28 Apr 2004 05:10:54 PM |
|
|
On 27 Apr 2004 18:29:10 -0700, (Truth Hunter) wrote:
I don't think Jesus was omnipresent while he was on earth as a man.
There is more to being a man than just having arms an legs. Man is not
omnipresent. Man is forced to take one day at a time. An omnipresent
being is not a man, wheter or not he has the arms and legs of a man.
Congradulations, the, you just finally figured out that Jesus was fully man.
And fully divine.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The_Sage" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
28 Apr 2004 08:05:15 PM |
|
|
Reply to article by: duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net>
Date written: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:10:54 -0500
MsgID:<3ua090phbtbk9f23sjmcm0s2p9iqlc3of4@4ax.com>
Congradulations, the, you just finally figured out that Jesus was fully man.
Jesus was not fully human unless he got married and had children.
And fully divine.
Anyone can be divine.
The Sage
=============================================================
My Home Page : http://members.cox.net/the.sage
"My friend plans to make a fortune with his invention. It's a
big metal box with a slot on one side and a sign that says
'How gullible are you? To find out, insert $50.'" -- COMEDY
COMES CLEAN, by Bill Jones
=============================================================
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DOC" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
29 Apr 2004 08:59:57 AM |
|
|
In article <3ua090phbtbk9f23sjmcm0s2p9iqlc3of4@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32
@cox.net sez in this lil' ole news'froup...!
Congradulations,
Another one who cannot spell CONGRATulations....... no 'D' as in
'dummy'......
It has a "T", just FYI.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan W. Craft" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
01 May 2004 02:48:19 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:59:57 -0500, DOC <DOC@idunno.net> ...emanated:
In article <3ua090phbtbk9f23sjmcm0s2p9iqlc3of4@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32
@cox.net sez in this lil' ole news'froup...!
Congradulations,
Another one who cannot spell CONGRATulations....... no 'D' as in
'dummy'......
It has a "T", just FYI.
LOL! YOU! You're one of the worst spellers I've ever seen!
Alan
.
|
|
|
| User: "DOC" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
01 May 2004 10:47:39 AM |
|
|
In article <rgl6909vc7qdrf6bh55bck4rdqvfsire5m@4ax.com>, mauritius4
@hotmail.com sez in this lil' ole news'froup...!
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:59:57 -0500, DOC <DOC@idunno.net> ...emanated:
In article <3ua090phbtbk9f23sjmcm0s2p9iqlc3of4@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32
@cox.net sez in this lil' ole news'froup...!
Congradulations,
Another one who cannot spell CONGRATulations....... no 'D' as in
'dummy'......
It has a "T", just FYI.
LOL! YOU! You're one of the worst spellers I've ever seen!
Alan
Actually, I'm a good speller, sonny- I just get typing too quickly, and
then my spelling suffers for it. I don;t always bother going bsck to
spell-check as long as the gist of the message gets through.
you got a problem with that? Too bad.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan W. Craft" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
01 May 2004 05:02:34 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 1 May 2004 10:47:39 -0500, DOC <DOC@idunno.net> ...emanated:
In article <rgl6909vc7qdrf6bh55bck4rdqvfsire5m@4ax.com>, mauritius4
@hotmail.com sez in this lil' ole news'froup...!
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:59:57 -0500, DOC <DOC@idunno.net> ...emanated:
In article <3ua090phbtbk9f23sjmcm0s2p9iqlc3of4@4ax.com>, duckgumbo32
@cox.net sez in this lil' ole news'froup...!
Congradulations,
Another one who cannot spell CONGRATulations....... no 'D' as in
'dummy'......
It has a "T", just FYI.
LOL! YOU! You're one of the worst spellers I've ever seen!
Alan
Actually, I'm a good speller, sonny- I just get typing too quickly, and
then my spelling suffers for it. I don;t always bother going bsck to
spell-check as long as the gist of the message gets through.
you got a problem with that? Too bad.
It only shows that you take no time to think about what you type,
either.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DOC" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
02 May 2004 11:40:40 AM |
|
|
In article <ki7890lac5ntg68u5shq0pasvq2eucgcuf@4ax.com>, mauritius4
@hotmail.com sez in this lil' ole news'froup...!
It only shows that you take no time to think about what you type,
either.
Bollocks. Now be silent.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "jw" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
28 Apr 2004 03:05:48 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On 27 Apr 2004 18:29:10 -0700, (Truth Hunter)
wrote:
john w replied
I don't think Jesus was omnipresent while he was on earth as a man.
There is more to being a man than just having arms an legs. Man is not
omnipresent. Man is forced to take one day at a time. An omnipresent
being is not a man, wheter or not he has the arms and legs of a man.
That is PRECISELY why, when He left us, He sent us the Holy Spirit,
the Indweller, the Enabler. In human form, Christ was limited to
space and time. As the Holy Spirit, He can go when/where He chooses,
and can be in 100 gazillion places at once.
jw
http://www.jewsforjudaism.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "The_Sage" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
28 Apr 2004 08:03:57 PM |
|
|
Reply to article by: jw <john_weatherly47<no>@yahoo.com>
Date written: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 01:05:48 -0700
MsgID:<napu805lbtlkhb9o2ksfvkv6uousuc0rpo@4ax.com>
That is PRECISELY why, when He left us, He sent us the Holy Spirit,
the Indweller, the Enabler. In human form, Christ was limited to
space and time. As the Holy Spirit, He can go when/where He chooses,
and can be in 100 gazillion places at once.
So if I have diarrhea in the toilet, Jesus is present in my diarrhea?
The Sage
=============================================================
My Home Page : http://members.cox.net/the.sage
"My friend plans to make a fortune with his invention. It's a
big metal box with a slot on one side and a sign that says
'How gullible are you? To find out, insert $50.'" -- COMEDY
COMES CLEAN, by Bill Jones
=============================================================
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
29 Apr 2004 04:21:09 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 01:05:48 -0700, jw
<john_weatherly47<no>@yahoo.com> cross posted to
alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.islam,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.atheism:
x-no-archive: yes
On 27 Apr 2004 18:29:10 -0700, (Truth Hunter)
wrote:
john w replied
I don't think Jesus was omnipresent while he was on earth as a man.
There is more to being a man than just having arms an legs. Man is not
omnipresent. Man is forced to take one day at a time. An omnipresent
being is not a man, wheter or not he has the arms and legs of a man.
That is PRECISELY why, when He left us, He sent us the Holy Spirit,
the Indweller, the Enabler.
That is the assertion. Proof?
In human form, Christ was limited to space and time.
That is the assertion. Proof?
As the Holy Spirit, He can go when/where He chooses,
and can be in 100 gazillion places at once.
That is the assertion. Proof?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
28 Apr 2004 04:20:49 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 01:05:48 -0700, jw
<john_weatherly47<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 27 Apr 2004 18:29:10 -0700, (Truth Hunter)
wrote:
john w replied
I don't think Jesus was omnipresent while he was on earth as a man.
There is more to being a man than just having arms an legs. Man is not
omnipresent. Man is forced to take one day at a time. An omnipresent
being is not a man, wheter or not he has the arms and legs of a man.
That is PRECISELY why, when He left us, He sent us the Holy Spirit,
the Indweller, the Enabler. In human form, Christ was limited to
space and time. As the Holy Spirit, He can go when/where He chooses,
and can be in 100 gazillion places at once.
Meaningless *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "RAS" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
28 Apr 2004 06:17:59 AM |
|
|
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 01:05:48 -0700, jw
<john_weatherly47<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 27 Apr 2004 18:29:10 -0700, (Truth Hunter)
wrote:
john w replied
I don't think Jesus was omnipresent while he was on earth as a man.
There is more to being a man than just having arms an legs. Man is not
omnipresent. Man is forced to take one day at a time. An omnipresent
being is not a man, wheter or not he has the arms and legs of a man.
That is PRECISELY why, when He left us, He sent us the Holy Spirit,
the Indweller, the Enabler. In human form, Christ was limited to
space and time. As the Holy Spirit, He can go when/where He chooses,
and can be in 100 gazillion places at once.
Meaningless *****.
So is your opinion.
RAS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
29 Apr 2004 04:21:11 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 07:17:59 -0400, RAS <rstrub@rocketmail.com> wrote:
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 01:05:48 -0700, jw
<john_weatherly47<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 27 Apr 2004 18:29:10 -0700, (Truth Hunter)
wrote:
john w replied
I don't think Jesus was omnipresent while he was on earth as a man.
There is more to being a man than just having arms an legs. Man is not
omnipresent. Man is forced to take one day at a time. An omnipresent
being is not a man, wheter or not he has the arms and legs of a man.
That is PRECISELY why, when He left us, He sent us the Holy Spirit,
the Indweller, the Enabler. In human form, Christ was limited to
space and time. As the Holy Spirit, He can go when/where He chooses,
and can be in 100 gazillion places at once.
Meaningless *****.
So is your opinion.
As long as John Cross Poster Weatherly cannot back his ASSERTIONS up
with some evidence, it remains bull *****.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
28 Apr 2004 06:43:56 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 07:17:59 -0400, RAS <rstrub@rocketmail.com> wrote:
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 01:05:48 -0700, jw
<john_weatherly47<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 27 Apr 2004 18:29:10 -0700, (Truth Hunter)
wrote:
john w replied
I don't think Jesus was omnipresent while he was on earth as a man.
There is more to being a man than just having arms an legs. Man is not
omnipresent. Man is forced to take one day at a time. An omnipresent
being is not a man, wheter or not he has the arms and legs of a man.
That is PRECISELY why, when He left us, He sent us the Holy Spirit,
the Indweller, the Enabler. In human form, Christ was limited to
space and time. As the Holy Spirit, He can go when/where He chooses,
and can be in 100 gazillion places at once.
Meaningless *****.
So is your opinion.
No, moron, it is meaningless ***** OUTSIDE YOUR RELIGION.
Your religion and its myths are as meaningless outside Christianity as
eg Islam, Hinduism etc are to Christians.
Get a brain and start using it instead of rudely preaching your
doctrines AT people outside your delusion, who couldn't care what you
believe AS LONG AS YOU HAVE THE COURTESY TO KEEP IT WITHIN THE BOUNDS
OF YOUR RELIGION.
RAS
.
|
|
|
| User: "jw" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
28 Apr 2004 03:17:19 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:43:56 GMT, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
john w replied under copyright
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 07:17:59 -0400, RAS <rstrub@rocketmail.com> wrote:
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 01:05:48 -0700, jw
<john_weatherly47<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 27 Apr 2004 18:29:10 -0700, (Truth Hunter)
wrote:
john w replied
I don't think Jesus was omnipresent while he was on earth as a man.
There is more to being a man than just having arms an legs. Man is not
omnipresent. Man is forced to take one day at a time. An omnipresent
being is not a man, wheter or not he has the arms and legs of a man.
That is PRECISELY why, when He left us, He sent us the Holy Spirit,
the Indweller, the Enabler. In human form, Christ was limited to
space and time. As the Holy Spirit, He can go when/where He chooses,
and can be in 100 gazillion places at once.
Meaningless *****.
So is your opinion.
No, moron, it is meaningless ***** OUTSIDE YOUR RELIGION.
You DO have the ability to not bother with posts that are outside YOUR
religion (that of self-worship).
Your religion and its myths are as meaningless outside Christianity as
eg Islam, Hinduism etc are to Christians.
Not at all. In fact, an educated person who knows the Bible can see
the future unfolding. We experience miracles (something ELSE you know
nothing about).
jw
Get a brain
So.... you think that any intelligent person does not believe in God?
LOL!! In 50 years of being a Christian, I have not had one pastor yet
who didn't have MULTIPLE doctorates.
Dr. Carpenter, Dr. Pegg, Dr. Culbreth, Dr. Fickett,
Dr. Stringfellow...
These men were ALL Bible translators (fluent in the ancient Hebrew and
Greek) NOT stupid men, but EDUCATED, thoughtful men. Men who
understood that they were sinners in need of salvation.
and start using it instead of rudely preaching your
doctrines AT people outside your delusion,
You DO have the option of not reading such posts. I suggest you
exercise that option, rather than sitting in a puddle of your own pee
(because your diaper is soaked) SHRIEKING!
jw
< snip >
RAS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
28 Apr 2004 06:11:49 PM |
|
|
In article <q14090dd3eeg2b4l19b15euvhvrv6ca3es@4ax.com>, jw <john_weatherly47
says...snip
You DO have the ability to not bother with posts that are outside YOUR
religion (that of self-worship).
Self-worship? I thought self-abuse (i.e., masturbation) was more your style.
Do you do it while you're composing your incest pornography novels?
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
29 Apr 2004 07:35:06 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:11:49 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:
john_w replied
In article <q14090dd3eeg2b4l19b15euvhvrv6ca3es@4ax.com>, jw <john_weatherly47
says...snip
You DO have the ability to not bother with posts that are outside YOUR
religion (that of self-worship).
Self-worship? I thought self-abuse (i.e., masturbation) was more your style.
Do you do it while you're composing your incest pornography novels?
Do you have anything else to say? Or are you TOTALLY absorbed with my
sex life?
I bet you have an orgasm every time I respond to one of your silly
taunts.
Why have you allowed Satan to take over your life?
Grow up. Get a life.
jw
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
30 Apr 2004 10:08:56 AM |
|
|
In article <8m73901m4ostlii9m9kov64n8baad74o51@4ax.com>, john w says...
x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:11:49 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:snip
Self-worship? I thought self-abuse (i.e., masturbation) was more your style.
Do you do it while you're composing your incest pornography novels?
Do you have anything else to say? Or are you TOTALLY absorbed with my
sex life?
Ah, so exactly how long have you been having sex with your sister? Or is it
your mother? Do they know that you've written about your experiences with them?
I bet you have an orgasm every time I respond to one of your silly
taunts.
LOL - Talk about delusions of grandure. Sorry, but unlike you, incest
pornography disgusts me.
Why have you allowed Satan to take over your life?
Why have you allowed your lust for biological relatives take over your life?
Grow up. Get a life.
Got one thanks - And unlike yours, it doesn't include fantasies about having sex
with blood relatives.
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
30 Apr 2004 03:11:03 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:35:06 -0700 in episode
<8m73901m4ostlii9m9kov64n8baad74o51@4ax.com> we saw our hero john w
<john_weatherly47@yahoo.com>:
x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:11:49 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:
john_w replied
In article <q14090dd3eeg2b4l19b15euvhvrv6ca3es@4ax.com>, jw
<john_weatherly47 says...snip
You DO have the ability to not bother with posts that are outside YOUR
religion (that of self-worship).
Self-worship? I thought self-abuse (i.e., masturbation) was more your
style. Do you do it while you're composing your incest pornography
novels?
Do you have anything else to say? Or are you TOTALLY absorbed with my sex
life?
I bet you have an orgasm every time I respond to one of your silly taunts.
Why have you allowed Satan to take over your life?
Hm... could it... PROJECTION???
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "walksalone" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
29 Apr 2004 10:15:04 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:35:06 -0700, john w wrote: & whined.
Follow ups set to trolls home group, arcb, poor sods.
Evenin witchypoo, mind if I observe old foul lips for a short short? TIA.
x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:11:49 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:
john_w replied
In article <q14090dd3eeg2b4l19b15euvhvrv6ca3es@4ax.com>, jw <john_weatherly47
says...snip
You DO have the ability to not bother with posts that are outside YOUR
religion (that of self-worship).
Self-worship? I thought self-abuse (i.e., masturbation) was more your style.
Do you do it while you're composing your incest pornography novels?
Do you have anything else to say? Or are you TOTALLY absorbed with my
sex life?
Maybe she wants to learn how to write porn, or spot those that need a
training manual so she can point out to young girls the type of males that
brag, & never satisfy? Who knows the ways of women, not I.
Come to that, that probably is the sum total of your sex life.
After all, you are on the net so much that a woman could move out without
you noticing.
I bet you have an orgasm every time I respond to one of your silly
taunts.
I doubt it, she appears to be a mature female, & unlike you, prefers he men
to be adult.
Why have you allowed Satan to take over your life?
Good question, why are you trying to replace the father of lies, & giving
it a run for its money?
Grow up. Get a life.
Would that you would, arcb deserves much better than you. A does Seattle &
the remainder of the world.
jw
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
walksalone who suspects jw would run screaming from a real; woman, for he
is not man enough to satisfy her intellectually, or likely to hear his
bragging, sexually. As an old preacher was won't to say, them that brag
don't, them that do don't say.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "walksalone" |
|
| Title: Re: jw recycled Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
28 Apr 2004 09:37:42 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 01:23:14 GMT, walksalone observed jw troll the
newsgroup's in a stellar display of ignorance & boasting.
Follow ups set, there may be small animals, vermin even, that could
accidentally be exposed to a jw post.
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:17:19 -0700, jw wrote:
Path: news.netfront.net!skynet.be!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!newsfeed.esat.net!priapus.visi.com!orange.octanews.net!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news.octanews.net!feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: jw <"john_weatherly47<no">
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.islam,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.atheism
Subject: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent
Message-ID: <q14090dd3eeg2b4l19b15euvhvrv6ca3es@4ax.com>
References: <e164e783.0404271729.7d97880b@posting.google.com> <napu805lbtlkhb9o2ksfvkv6uousuc0rpo@4ax.com> <cqtu80dp1lpqfi93sch69e6gf74qjc78qo@4ax.com> <408f9516$0$28900$61fed72c@news.rcn.com> <l26v80poof6jgpklc23u6cmaq6i6od603c@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 76
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:17:19 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.5.187.56
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1083183099 67.5.187.56 (Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:11:39 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:11:39 CDT
Xref: news.netfront.net alt.religion.christian:528005 alt.religion.christian.baptist:314775 alt.religion.islam:524248 alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic:458313 alt.atheism:1250255
x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:43:56 GMT, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
john w replied under copyright
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 07:17:59 -0400, RAS <rstrub@rocketmail.com> wrote:
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 01:05:48 -0700, jw
<john_weatherly47<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 27 Apr 2004 18:29:10 -0700, (Truth Hunter)
wrote:
john w replied
I don't think Jesus was omnipresent while he was on earth as a man.
There is more to being a man than just having arms an legs. Man is not
omnipresent. Man is forced to take one day at a time. An omnipresent
being is not a man, wheter or not he has the arms and legs of a man.
That is PRECISELY why, when He left us, He sent us the Holy Spirit,
the Indweller, the Enabler. In human form, Christ was limited to
space and time. As the Holy Spirit, He can go when/where He chooses,
and can be in 100 gazillion places at once.
Meaningless *****.
So is your opinion.
No, moron, it is meaningless ***** OUTSIDE YOUR RELIGION.
You DO have the ability to not bother with posts that are outside YOUR
religion (that of self-worship).
That would be yours,. & you are a perfect example of the self made m]man,
AKA shoddy workmanship.
Your religion and its myths are as meaningless outside Christianity as
eg Islam, Hinduism etc are to Christians.
Not at all. In fact, an educated person who knows the Bible can see
That left you out. Your posting history indicates you are neither educated
as the word is normally used, or know the xian grimorie.
the future unfolding. We experience miracles (something ELSE you know
nothing about).
Everyone else calls your miracle blind luck or a wino's delusion.
jw
the famous jw., the porn writer/buyer?
Get a brain
So.... you think that any intelligent person does not believe in God?
LOL!! In 50 years of being a Christian, I have not had one pastor yet
In how many years, are you over 100 yet?
& true, you have not had a pastor that admits it. I can see why.
who didn't have MULTIPLE doctorates.
A doctorate in theology is a doctorate in the study of nothing. Not exactly
bragging rights for most people.
Dr. Carpenter, Dr. Pegg, Dr. Culbreth, Dr. Fickett,
Dr. Stringfellow...
One thing can be said for you, you drop names faster than a diarrhetic
goose drops *****.
These men were ALL Bible translators (fluent in the ancient Hebrew and
Greek) NOT stupid men, but EDUCATED, thoughtful men. Men who
understood that they were sinners in need of salvation.
Not necessarily, did they preach for free? What did they retire with? I
doubt you know them, that well. If at all.
and start using it instead of rudely preaching your
doctrines AT people outside your delusion,
You DO have the option of not reading such posts. I suggest you
As you have the options of learning what you are talking about & quitting
your crossposting. Not that anyone would expect either option to be
exercised by you. Ignorance is bliss & you are living proof of that claim.
exercise that option, rather than sitting in a puddle of your own pee
(because your diaper is soaked) SHRIEKING!
No one would act like you do, so you are projecting your faults on others
again. When it comes to making a mess & sitting in it, you are the queen of
ARCB. Now, if you would just learn to stay in your crib & away from a
computer.
jw
The whining one that try's to denigrate those that it knows are better than
it, that one? Better educated & better people.
< snip >
RAS
walksalone who notes, jw is still unable to dazzle anyone with its
brilliance, & unable to baffle them with its bull *****. Might be because
his posting history says he is not brilliant & full of *****?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
30 Apr 2004 05:56:49 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:17:19 -0700 in episode
<q14090dd3eeg2b4l19b15euvhvrv6ca3es@4ax.com> we saw our hero jw
<john_weatherly47<no>@yahoo.com>:
Not at all. In fact, an educated person who knows the Bible can see the
future unfolding. We experience miracles (something ELSE you know nothing
about).
WHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!
<gasp>
WWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
29 Apr 2004 04:21:13 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:17:19 -0700, jw
<john_weatherly47<no>@yahoo.com> cross posted to
alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.islam,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.atheism:
No, moron, it is meaningless ***** OUTSIDE YOUR RELIGION.
You DO have the ability to not bother with posts that are outside YOUR
religion (that of self-worship).
Nonsense. Any indication that the poster worships himself?
Your religion and its myths are as meaningless outside Christianity as
eg Islam, Hinduism etc are to Christians.
Not at all. In fact, an educated person who knows the Bible can see
the future unfolding. We experience miracles (something ELSE you know
nothing about).
That is the assertion. Proof?
Get a brain
So.... you think that any intelligent person does not believe in God?
Yes.
LOL!! In 50 years of being a Christian, I have not had one pastor yet
who didn't have MULTIPLE doctorates.
So? Theology is the 'science' of nothing.
These men were ALL Bible translators (fluent in the ancient Hebrew and
Greek) NOT stupid men, but EDUCATED, thoughtful men. Men who
understood that they were sinners in need of salvation.
No, that is what they prefer to BELIEVE. Had they been born in
Thailand, they would be monk, hold a doctorate in Buddhist theology
and wrote about the Buddha.
and start using it instead of rudely preaching your
doctrines AT people outside your delusion,
You DO have the option of not reading such posts. I suggest you
exercise that option, rather than sitting in a puddle of your own pee
(because your diaper is soaked) SHRIEKING!
Either you are mentally 5 years old, or an early case of Alzheimer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
29 Apr 2004 07:59:02 AM |
|
|
In article <uuj090lsql0q5h7tf989fv7potakinbaun@4ax.com>, Jos Flachs says...
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:17:19 -0700, jw
<john_weatherly47<no>@yahoo.com> cross posted to
alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.islam,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.atheism:
No, moron, it is meaningless ***** OUTSIDE YOUR RELIGION.
You DO have the ability to not bother with posts that are outside YOUR
religion (that of self-worship).
Nonsense. Any indication that the poster worships himself?
Your religion and its myths are as meaningless outside Christianity as
eg Islam, Hinduism etc are to Christians.
Not at all. In fact, an educated person who knows the Bible can see
the future unfolding. We experience miracles (something ELSE you know
nothing about).
That is the assertion. Proof?
Get a brain
So.... you think that any intelligent person does not believe in God?
Yes.
LOL!! In 50 years of being a Christian, I have not had one pastor yet
who didn't have MULTIPLE doctorates.
So? Theology is the 'science' of nothing.
These men were ALL Bible translators (fluent in the ancient Hebrew and
Greek) NOT stupid men, but EDUCATED, thoughtful men. Men who
understood that they were sinners in need of salvation.
No, that is what they prefer to BELIEVE. Had they been born in
Thailand, they would be monk, hold a doctorate in Buddhist theology
and wrote about the Buddha.
and start using it instead of rudely preaching your
doctrines AT people outside your delusion,
You DO have the option of not reading such posts. I suggest you
exercise that option, rather than sitting in a puddle of your own pee
(because your diaper is soaked) SHRIEKING!
Either you are mentally 5 years old, or an early case of Alzheimer.
What's really funny is that his fellow Baptists can't tolerate him either ;)
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
29 Apr 2004 11:06:42 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:59:02 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:
What's really funny is that his fellow Baptists can't tolerate him either ;)
Not at all. They don't tolerate much, do they? They don't tolerate
their fellow members, when eating in Hooters...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: I don't think Jesus was omnipresent |
30 Apr 2004 07:40:45 AM |
|
|
In article <f3k390tcgf0g9a4sne3lnk0bvrpus3famn@4ax.com>, Jos Flachs says...
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:59:02 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:
What's really funny is that his fellow Baptists can't tolerate him either ;)
Not at all. They don't tolerate much, do they? They don't tolerate
their fellow members, when eating in Hooters...
LOL, I guess not. One of my friends gave me a bumper stick once which read "The
only problem with Baptists is that they didn't hold them under the water long
enough" (and no, I did NOT put it on my car) :)
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
