I thought this place.....



 Religions > Atheism > I thought this place.....

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "William Baker"
Date: 30 Dec 2003 03:19:52 PM
Object: I thought this place.....
Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed Religious
Discussion.
Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..
.

User: "Geoff Offermann"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 30 Dec 2003 06:49:25 PM
"William Baker" <Willybobba@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:XZlIb.238695$_M.1054857@attbi_s54...

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed Religious
Discussion.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..

Unfortunately, unlike talk.origins, atheism provides very little
subject matter to talk about except it's opposition to theism.
Basically, I get the most satisfaction out of this group by
discussing the silly things that theists do and say.
.

User: "the cutest atheist"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 31 Dec 2003 05:06:29 AM
"William Baker" <Willybobba@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:XZlIb.238695$_M.1054857@attbi_s54...

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed Religious
Discussion.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..

that's nice. think that up yourself?
.

User: "Peacenik"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 05 Jan 2004 12:54:17 AM
"William Baker" <Willybobba@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:XZlIb.238695$_M.1054857@attbi_s54...

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed Religious
Discussion.

Well, we keep getting religious people invading this NG trying to convert
us, or telling us how bad they tink we are.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..

Sure it is. Keep reading. Atheism as a meaningful topic depends on the
existence of theism, and therefore atheists discuss religion. In daily life,
we are targeted by theists for proselytization, legislation detremental to
the lives of atheists is passed by theists, and in general there is a lot
coming from the world of theists that affects our lives. So topics of
discussion among atheists generally have something to do with the world of
the religious.
Atheism depends on the existence of theism to make it a meaninful topic.
There's a reason there is no such thing as a-leprechaunism: that's because
there are no leprechaunists (or, if there are, they sure don't make life
hard for the rest of us who don't believe in leprechauns).
--
Peacenik
.

User: "Owen Hughes"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 31 Dec 2003 01:48:47 PM
"William Baker" <Willybobba@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<XZlIb.238695$_M.1054857@attbi_s54>...

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed Religious
Discussion.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..

We didn't invite them.
They just barged in and started pissing on the carpet.
.

User: "Sean C"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 30 Dec 2003 06:50:34 PM
In article <XZlIb.238695$_M.1054857@attbi_s54>, William Baker
<Willybobba@hotmail.com> wrote:

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed Religious
Discussion.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..

There's only so much you can say about not believing in God. "Hey Joe,
you believe in God?" "Nah" "Me neither. I guess that makes us
atheists."
Pretty much everything after that is a discussion of religion, or
politics, or whatever.
Sean C
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
.
User: "raven1"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 30 Dec 2003 06:51:36 PM
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:50:34 -0500, Sean C
<redhawk@burnspammersalivehvc.rr.com> wrote:

In article <XZlIb.238695$_M.1054857@attbi_s54>, William Baker
<Willybobba@hotmail.com> wrote:

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed Religious
Discussion.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..


There's only so much you can say about not believing in God. "Hey Joe,
you believe in God?" "Nah" "Me neither. I guess that makes us
atheists."

Pretty much everything after that is a discussion of religion, or
politics, or whatever.

And unlike in a bar, we don't punch each others' lights out when we
disagree on either, although a few feathers get ruffled here and
there...! ;-)
---
ROT-13 on Email to reply.
.
User: "Sean C"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 31 Dec 2003 05:46:47 AM
In article <6m74vvss7vgfo2e6ju8kedifchqmulc40i@4ax.com>, raven1
<cflpurqryrcunag@synfuznvy.pbz> wrote:

And unlike in a bar, we don't punch each others' lights out when we
disagree on either, although a few feathers get ruffled here and
there...! ;-)

This can be a pretty rough group at times, even by Usenet standards.
Any poor Christian sap wonders in here with an honest question about
atheism, and he is likely to be flayed and boiled alive :)
Sean C
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
.
User: "Mekkala"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 31 Dec 2003 09:40:59 AM
On 31 Dec 2003, Sean C <redhawk@burnspammersalivehvc.rr.com> screwed up
his face, groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:311220030646472232%redhawk@burnspammersalivehvc.rr.com:

In article <6m74vvss7vgfo2e6ju8kedifchqmulc40i@4ax.com>, raven1
<cflpurqryrcunag@synfuznvy.pbz> wrote:

And unlike in a bar, we don't punch each others' lights out when we
disagree on either, although a few feathers get ruffled here and
there...! ;-)


This can be a pretty rough group at times, even by Usenet standards.
Any poor Christian sap wonders in here with an honest question about
atheism, and he is likely to be flayed and boiled alive :)

I dunno. Generally, if they're polite and respectful of us (it's *our*
group after all), and seem genuinely interested in discussing it, as
opposed to just trolling, most people here will give reasonable, well-
thought-out answers. It's when they start displaying stupidity and
rudeness that they get blasted, usually.
--
Mekkala, Atheist #2148
"Atheism is ... the bed-rock of sanity in a world of madness."
--Emmett F. Fields
.

User: "Beowulf"

Title: Re: Re: I thought this place..... 31 Dec 2003 11:37:40 AM
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 06:46:47 -0500, Sean C
<redhawk@burnspammersalivehvc.rr.com> ejaculated:

In article <6m74vvss7vgfo2e6ju8kedifchqmulc40i@4ax.com>, raven1
<cflpurqryrcunag@synfuznvy.pbz> wrote:

And unlike in a bar, we don't punch each others' lights out when we
disagree on either, although a few feathers get ruffled here and
there...! ;-)


This can be a pretty rough group at times, even by Usenet standards.
Any poor Christian sap wonders in here with an honest question about
atheism, and he is likely to be flayed and boiled alive :)

Lobotomized godfucker shoulda oughta known better than to wander into
the land of free thought. Oops. That's what you're talking about
isn't it? Sorry.
--
Jesus is my crush.
.




User: "Rv Cloim"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 30 Dec 2003 05:14:51 PM
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:19:52 +0000, William Baker wrote:

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed Religious
Discussion.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..

So what would you like to talk about?
.
User: "Mekkala"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 31 Dec 2003 09:38:15 AM
On 30 Dec 2003, Rv Cloim <cloim@propylaea.tor.org> screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:pan.2003.12.30.17.15.08.542005@propylaea.tor.org:

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:19:52 +0000, William Baker wrote:

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed
Religious Discussion.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..


So what would you like to talk about?

He'd like to hear something like this:
Atheist1: There's no God.
Atheist2: Wow, you're right, there isn't, is there?
Atheist3: You guys are so smart! You're saying exactly what I've always
thought!
Atheist2: I know, right? It's so obvious there's no God.
Atheist3: That's so true. I mean, I looked just the other day, and
nope, no God.
Atheist1: Yep, God's definitely not here.
Atheist3: True. He's not.
Atheist2: Yep.
Atheist1: Uh-huh.
Atheist2: Wow. True.
Atheist3: Yeah.
Atheist2: Soo... you guys wanna talk about how there's no God some more?
Atheists1&3: ***** no, we're outta here.
Face it, it's no fun preaching to the choir day in and day out. We need
theists in here for debates (though perhaps we could do without the
idiots like duke).
--
Mekkala, Atheist #2148
"Atheism is ... the bed-rock of sanity in a world of madness."
--Emmett F. Fields
.
User: "Earl Camembert"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 31 Dec 2003 02:23:08 PM
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:38:15 GMT, Mekkala
<joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote:

On 30 Dec 2003, Rv Cloim <cloim@propylaea.tor.org> screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:pan.2003.12.30.17.15.08.542005@propylaea.tor.org:

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:19:52 +0000, William Baker wrote:

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed
Religious Discussion.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..

(SNIP)

Face it, it's no fun preaching to the choir day in and day out. We need
theists in here for debates (though perhaps we could do without the
idiots like duke).

There can be no atheism without theism. There can be no
alt.flame.***** with out Negroes. There can be no bad without good.
.
User: "Mekkala"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 31 Dec 2003 03:03:39 PM
On 31 Dec 2003, Earl Camembert <nospam@forme.org> screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:lqb6vvgqb1g26kvd11bpi1p35b9dv83cm4@4ax.com:

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:38:15 GMT, Mekkala
<joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote:

On 30 Dec 2003, Rv Cloim <cloim@propylaea.tor.org> screwed up his

face,

groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:pan.2003.12.30.17.15.08.542005@propylaea.tor.org:

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:19:52 +0000, William Baker wrote:

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of

religious

discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed
Religious Discussion.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..

(SNIP)

Face it, it's no fun preaching to the choir day in and day out. We

need

theists in here for debates (though perhaps we could do without the
idiots like duke).


There can be no atheism without theism.

Not true. Without theism we would all be atheists. There would be no
word for it, and there would be no discussion of it, but atheism qua
atheism would still exist.
--
Mekkala, Atheist #2148
"Atheism is ... the bed-rock of sanity in a world of madness."
--Emmett F. Fields
.




User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 30 Dec 2003 06:49:38 PM
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:19:52 GMT, "William Baker"
<Willybobba@hotmail.com> posted to alt.atheism:

Was supposed to be bout atheism.

It isn't. It's for atheists to discuss things of interest to
atheists. If you're not interested in a particular thread, don't read
it.
--
"Damn. Looks like all of usenet agrees that you don't have the logical
faculties to prove the statement 'dogshit is not peanut butter' if we
gave you a jar of each and a box of crackers" - John Hattan to Tichy
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.

User: "LP"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 30 Dec 2003 11:07:27 PM
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:19:52 GMT, "William Baker"
<Willybobba@hotmail.com> wrote:

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed Religious
Discussion.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..

Go take a look in the "health" newsgroups and see how many threads are
discussing HIV, Asthma, obesity, and the flue.
Understand?
.

User: "LP"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 31 Dec 2003 12:51:08 AM
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:19:52 GMT, "William Baker"
<Willybobba@hotmail.com> wrote:

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed Religious
Discussion.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..

Go take a look in the "health" newsgroups and see how many threads are
discussing HIV, Asthma, obesity, and the flue.
Understand?
.

User: "Kate "

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 30 Dec 2003 07:25:03 PM
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:19:52 GMT, "William Baker"
<Willybobba@hotmail.com> wrote:

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed Religious
Discussion.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..

No - it's about whether the religious stuff is adequate evidence of
God. over and over and over and over.......
.

User: "raven1"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 30 Dec 2003 04:40:34 PM
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:19:52 GMT, "William Baker"
<Willybobba@hotmail.com> wrote:

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed Religious
Discussion.

Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..

Tell you what; why don't you personally get all the theists to clear
out, and we'll take it from there...?
---
ROT-13 on Email to reply.
.
User: "Carol Lee Smith"

Title: Re: I thought this place..... 30 Dec 2003 07:11:38 PM
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:19:52 GMT, "William Baker"
<Willybobba@hotmail.com> wrote:

Was supposed to be bout atheism...and all I see is 100s of religious
discussions and arguments. I think this place should be renamed Religious
Discussion.
Because Athiesism surely isn't happening here..

Since I have no idea what "Athiesism" is, how can I tell if it is
happening here?
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER