If a property is "subjective" by definition, can its assigned value be considered in any sense "objective"?



 Religions > Atheism > If a property is "subjective" by definition, can its assigned value be considered in any sense "objective"?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Uncle Clover"
Date: 30 Oct 2006 06:43:54 PM
Object: If a property is "subjective" by definition, can its assigned value be considered in any sense "objective"?
Well, this was a quick query to arise from my "evil" post.
If you have property "X", and one of the defining features of "X" is that it is
a subjective property, can you ever a given value of that property to be its
"objective" value?
For instance, suppose "X" is "tallness". One's height is an objective property,
but what constitutes "tall" is a subjective one. If all who understand the
concept of "tallness" say that a given object is "very tall", could not the
"very tall" status of the object be considered something I can only think to
call "quasi-objective"?
Might be one for the fuzzy logic crowd. :-?
--
L8r,
Uncle Clover
************************************************
The true mark of a civilized society is that its
citizens know how to hate each other peacefully.
************************************************
.

User: "Denis Loubet"

Title: Re: If a property is "subjective" by definition, can its assigned value be considered in any sense "objective"? 30 Oct 2006 08:05:53 PM
"Uncle Clover" <UncleClover@SpamMeNot.com> wrote in message
news:1r6dk219cqtu0sqbobn6sngi1bllfgh43i@4ax.com...

Well, this was a quick query to arise from my "evil" post.

If you have property "X", and one of the defining features of "X" is that
it is
a subjective property, can you ever a given value of that property to be
its
"objective" value?

For instance, suppose "X" is "tallness". One's height is an objective
property,
but what constitutes "tall" is a subjective one. If all who understand
the
concept of "tallness" say that a given object is "very tall", could not
the
"very tall" status of the object be considered something I can only think
to
call "quasi-objective"?

Might be one for the fuzzy logic crowd. :-?

Well, my dislike of seafood is subjective since it's a purely internal value
judgment, but my avoidance of seafood is objective since anyone can observe
it.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: If a property is "subjective" by definition, can its assigned value be considered in any sense "objective"? 30 Oct 2006 08:26:34 PM
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:43:54 -0500, Uncle Clover
<UncleClover@SpamMeNot.com> wrote:

Well, this was a quick query to arise from my "evil" post.

If you have property "X", and one of the defining features of "X" is that it is
a subjective property, can you ever a given value of that property to be its
"objective" value?

For instance, suppose "X" is "tallness". One's height is an objective property,
but what constitutes "tall" is a subjective one. If all who understand the
concept of "tallness" say that a given object is "very tall", could not the
"very tall" status of the object be considered something I can only think to
call "quasi-objective"?
Might be one for the fuzzy logic crowd. :-?

Nope. Tallness refers to an objective property - height. But
tallness itself is in the eye of the beholder so it's subjective.
(Someone 7' tall is short to an 8' tall man.) Once we define "tall"
as 5'10" to 6', very tall as > 6' but not as high as 6'6", etc.,
you're not really talking about tallness, you're redefining the word
"tallness" to be a coarse measure of height.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"So much blood has been shed by the Church because of an omission from the Gospel: "Ye
shall be indifferent as to what your neighbor's religion is." Not merely tolerant of it,
but indifferent to it. Divinity is claimed for many religions; but no religion is great
enough or divine enough to add that new law to its code."
- Mark Twain, a Biography
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.

User: "Uncle Clover"

Title: Re: If a property is "subjective" by definition, can its assigned value be considered in any sense "objective"? 30 Oct 2006 06:47:57 PM
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:43:54 -0500, Uncle Clover <UncleClover@SpamMeNot.com>
wrote:

Well, this was a quick query to arise from my "evil" post.

If you have property "X", and one of the defining features of "X" is that it is
a subjective property, can you ever a given value of that property to be its
"objective" value?

Wups... Last part should've read: "can you ever say that a given value of that
property is its 'objective' value?"
Soiree...
--
L8r,
Uncle Clover
************************************************
The true mark of a civilized society is that its
citizens know how to hate each other peacefully.
************************************************
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
GOD IS A CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
Hardly any subjective liberals over the electoral jam were investing in touch with the noisy wave.
one more environmental possessions subject to the palestinian location were compensating after the subjective lounge
THE CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
Are you unhappy, I mean, walking no doubt subjective tradings?
The Dual of Subjective Morals: Bilbo vs. Butler
Scientism, and the nature of subjective beauty
Neil Bush Caught Boning Someone Else's Wife? So Much for That GOP Bush "Family Value".
Find out the market value for your soul!
Still More of That GOP "Family Value": Strom Thurmond
DAD
Christians Value Children
OT: Buffett's value approach to investing fits well in our new low-inflation world
In the News: Southern Baptists debate value of public education
The Value Of Family.
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER