I'm published again! (Gay marriages)



 Religions > Atheism > I'm published again! (Gay marriages)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Gregory Gadow"
Date: 04 Aug 2003 09:35:19 AM
Object: I'm published again! (Gay marriages)
From the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Sunday, August 3, 2003
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/133347_ltrs3.html
My letter reads:
Reserving marriage for straights is a special right
Why is it so vital that marriage remain an exclusive, heterosexuals-only
country club? If extending the many rights and responsibilities of
marriage to same-sex couples is a "special right," how is reserving
marriage for straight couples anything less than a special right?
To claim that marriage exists for the security of children is an
easy-to-prove lie. There is no requirement for couples to prove their
fertility in order to obtain a marriage license; there is no requirement
that a couple procreate in order to retain their marriage license.
Marriage exists in order to create a family, whether or not children are
or may be a part of that family. Marriage creates security for the
family by providing for inheritance, power-of-attorney, assumed
co-ownership, survivorship, visitation and next-of-kin status, among
many such protections. The irony of prohibiting same-sex marriages is
that gay people -- too often disowned and excluded from the families we
grew up with -- are much more in need of these protections than are
straight people.
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"If you make yourself a sheep, the wolves will eat you."
-- Benjamin Franklin
.

User: "Dave"

Title: Re: I'm published again! (Gay marriages) 04 Aug 2003 02:33:48 PM
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in message news:<3F2E6F27.266254CB@serv.net>...

From the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Sunday, August 3, 2003

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/133347_ltrs3.html

My letter reads:

Reserving marriage for straights is a special right

Why is it so vital that marriage remain an exclusive, heterosexuals-only
country club? If extending the many rights and responsibilities of
marriage to same-sex couples is a "special right," how is reserving
marriage for straight couples anything less than a special right?

To claim that marriage exists for the security of children is an
easy-to-prove lie. There is no requirement for couples to prove their
fertility in order to obtain a marriage license; there is no requirement
that a couple procreate in order to retain their marriage license.
Marriage exists in order to create a family, whether or not children are
or may be a part of that family. Marriage creates security for the
family by providing for inheritance, power-of-attorney, assumed
co-ownership, survivorship, visitation and next-of-kin status, among
many such protections. The irony of prohibiting same-sex marriages is
that gay people -- too often disowned and excluded from the families we
grew up with -- are much more in need of these protections than are
straight people.

What we need to do is return to the original intent laid down by the
founders of this great Christian nation;

1. Only white male landowners should be allowed to vote.
2. Blacks should be returned to slavery.
3. etc...
.

User: "Mark Richardson"

Title: Re: I'm published again! (Gay marriages) 04 Aug 2003 08:47:21 PM
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 07:35:19 -0700, Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net>
wrote:

From the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Sunday, August 3, 2003

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/133347_ltrs3.html

My letter reads:

Reserving marriage for straights is a special right

Well said Greg!
In a related story...
Here in Tasmania the gay rights movement is considering taking the
Roman Catholic Church to court if it publishes/distributes the
Vaticans recent reafirmation of the sinfulness of the "gay life style"
and speaking against gay marriage.
Tasmania now has laws against "hate speach"
(although I am a little uncomfortable with any anti -speech
legislation)
Could get interesting.
8-)
(Tasmania was the last state in Australia where homosexual sex was
illegal -
See
http://www.tased.edu.au/tasonline/tasqueer/tasqueer.html)
I am straight guy myself, but take an interest in these things.
(like freedom, justice...)
8-)
Mark.
--
Mark Richardson mDOTrichardsonATutasDOTeduDOTau
Member of S.M.A.S.H.
(Sarcastic Middle aged Atheists with a Sense of Humour)
-----------------------------------------------------
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Faggots lose again - Strong Support Is Found for Ban on Gay Marriage
Bush's gay male hooker at it again
Bush's Anti-Gay Gay Hooker Caught Once Again
Bush's gay hooker running for office again
Bush's gay hooker in the news again
Re: repub hypocrisy strikes again - G.O.P. Consultant's (who helped Jesse Helms hate gays) Marriage Is a Gay One
Bush's Gay Hooker Gets Caught Again
Americans Embrace Gay Cowboys, Shun Christian Missionaries At the Box Office. Again
Anti-Gay Christian sentenced. Yep, child porn again.
Bush's gay hooker in the news again
"16 Once And Again" - gay kiss (female) - Wow...
Many Gay Men Dishonest About Their True Agenda
Re: For Every Gay Person, there are NINE Straight ALLIES!
What do 'gay parents' tell their kids when they ask...
The U.S. Supreme Court refused Friday to block the nation's first state-sanctioned gay marriages
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER