| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang The Almighty" |
| Date: |
02 Apr 2004 09:10:53 PM |
| Object: |
Imagine if this were a Republican President...!! |
Imagine if this were a Republican President...
Documents obtained using the Freedom of Information act show that
President Bill Clinton ignored the genocide that was going on in
Rwanda, and knew about it before and as it was happening. According to
declassified documents, the Clinton administration buried the
information to justify its inaction. Officials were already privately
using the word genocide within days of the start of the killings, but
said nothing publicly because Clinton chose not to intervene. It took
the death squads three months to murder 800,000 people.
Now, the US had no interests in Rwanda, so the policy of not
intervening may have been right, but where is the Congressional Black
Caucus on this one? What if this were President Bush instead? We would
never hear the end of it. Can you imagine? It would be the top story
in the news media for days on end, with the president being accused of
genocide and racism for his inaction. Liberals would be calling for
not only impeachment, but probably war crimes trials. Just envision
the speeches on floor of the House and Senate. The left would be
picketing the White House with pitchforks.
Remember this the next time someone tells you there's no bias in the
media.
--
Left-wing liberals are EVERYTHING they accuse the right of being. They
are mean, vicious, hateful, greedy, cold-hearted, closed-minded,
selfish, intolerant, bigoted and racist.
Liberals HATE America!
.
|
|
| User: "W. Syme" |
|
| Title: Re: Imagine if this were a Republican President...!! |
08 Apr 2004 02:49:15 PM |
|
|
On 2 Apr 2004 19:10:53 -0800, (Yang The Almighty)
wrote:
Remember this the next time someone tells you there's no bias in the
media.
Bush is getting nowhere near as much stick from the media for his war
as Clinton got for having a *****. If anything, the media are biased
against "liberals".
--
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thessalonians 5:21)
W. Syme (pseudonym), European, non-native English speaker, "soft" atheist.
Email will not be read.
.
|
|
|
| User: "TCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Imagine if this were a Republican President...!! |
08 Apr 2004 03:08:46 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:49:15 GMT, W Syme <Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote:
On 2 Apr 2004 19:10:53 -0800, (Yang The Almighty)
wrote:
Remember this the next time someone tells you there's no bias in the
media.
Bush is getting nowhere near as much stick from the media for his war
as Clinton got for having a *****. If anything, the media are biased
against "liberals".
That's because to the prudes of the US, there is nothing worse than sex for
pleasure and blowjobs qualify as that.
Which is worse:
lying about a ***** (clinton)
lying about using the CIA to thwart the election process (nixon)
lying about selling arms to a hostile nation to fund an illegal war
(iran-contra)
lying about reasons to go to war (iraq)
?
Obviously the first one is the worst.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Imagine if this were a Republican President...!! |
08 Apr 2004 04:08:57 PM |
|
|
TCS <The-Central-Scrutinizer@p.o.b.o.x.com> wrote in
news:slrnc7bcae.fcq.The-Central-Scrutinizer@linux.client.comcast.net:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:49:15 GMT, W Syme
<Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote:
On 2 Apr 2004 19:10:53 -0800, (Yang The Almighty)
wrote:
Remember this the next time someone tells you there's no bias in the
media.
Bush is getting nowhere near as much stick from the media for his war
as Clinton got for having a *****. If anything, the media are biased
against "liberals".
That's because to the prudes of the US, there is nothing worse than
sex for pleasure and blowjobs qualify as that.
Which is worse:
lying about a ***** (clinton)
Clinton was acquitted of the charges in his impeachment.
lying about using the CIA to thwart the election process (nixon)
Nixon resigned under threat of impeachment.
lying about selling arms to a hostile nation to fund an illegal war
(iran-contra)
Hearings were held and several participants in the scheme were
convicted.
lying about reasons to go to war (iraq)
It's only been all over "the media" for months now. The biggest problem
the opposition has is that there obviously was justification for going
to war with Iraq, whether the reasons given before the attack were
incorrect or not.
Obviously the first one is the worst.
Obviously you aren't much on history.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "TCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Imagine if this were a Republican President...!! |
08 Apr 2004 04:46:43 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 21:08:57 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
TCS <The-Central-Scrutinizer@p.o.b.o.x.com> wrote in
news:slrnc7bcae.fcq.The-Central-Scrutinizer@linux.client.comcast.net:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:49:15 GMT, W Syme
<Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote:
On 2 Apr 2004 19:10:53 -0800, (Yang The Almighty)
wrote:
Remember this the next time someone tells you there's no bias in the
media.
Bush is getting nowhere near as much stick from the media for his war
as Clinton got for having a *****. If anything, the media are biased
against "liberals".
That's because to the prudes of the US, there is nothing worse than
sex for pleasure and blowjobs qualify as that.
Which is worse:
lying about a ***** (clinton)
Clinton was acquitted of the charges in his impeachment.
lying about using the CIA to thwart the election process (nixon)
Nixon resigned under threat of impeachment.
lying about selling arms to a hostile nation to fund an illegal war
(iran-contra)
Hearings were held and several participants in the scheme were
convicted.
That wasn't a decision made by a crony. Do you honestly believe the president
and the other cabinet members "didn't know" or "didn't remember" anything
about that affair?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Imagine if this were a Republican President...!! |
08 Apr 2004 02:56:28 PM |
|
|
W. Syme <Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote in
news:6b39e1160e4f45847656b981df87ee5e@news.1usenet.com:
On 2 Apr 2004 19:10:53 -0800, (Yang The Almighty)
wrote:
Remember this the next time someone tells you there's no bias in the
media.
Bush is getting nowhere near as much stick from the media for his war
as Clinton got for having a *****. If anything, the media are biased
against "liberals".
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=3542
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=2399
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "W. Syme" |
|
| Title: Re: Imagine if this were a Republican President...!! |
08 Apr 2004 03:16:13 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:56:28 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
W. Syme <Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote in
news:6b39e1160e4f45847656b981df87ee5e@news.1usenet.com:
On 2 Apr 2004 19:10:53 -0800, (Yang The Almighty)
wrote:
Remember this the next time someone tells you there's no bias in the
media.
Bush is getting nowhere near as much stick from the media for his war
as Clinton got for having a *****. If anything, the media are biased
against "liberals".
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=3542
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=2399
That means very little. I'm sure that there are as many sites out
there pointing out the terrible conservative things that didn't make
the media. The fact that Bush seems to be attacked by the media (god I
hate that word) might have more to do with the fact that attacking a
current president sells more papers that attacking the opposition.
--
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thessalonians 5:21)
W. Syme (pseudonym), European, non-native English speaker, "soft" atheist.
Email will not be read.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: Imagine if this were a Republican President...!! |
08 Apr 2004 04:14:32 PM |
|
|
The fact that Bush seems to be attacked by the media (god I
hate that word) might have more to do with the fact that attacking a
current president sells more papers that attacking the opposition.
It might sell papers but it is not the print media which are Bush's biggest
supporters. It is the television media and television is firmly in the hands of
the GOP. Television also has much more of an audience than the print media.
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Department of Applied Rattan Use
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking, which
leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy." - Robert Anton
Wilson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Imagine if this were a Republican President...!! |
08 Apr 2004 04:02:03 PM |
|
|
W. Syme <Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote in
news:f58d52a077cf817add625e695f8d9085@news.1usenet.com:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:56:28 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
W. Syme <Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote in
news:6b39e1160e4f45847656b981df87ee5e@news.1usenet.com:
On 2 Apr 2004 19:10:53 -0800, (Yang The Almighty)
wrote:
Remember this the next time someone tells you there's no bias in the
media.
Bush is getting nowhere near as much stick from the media for his
war as Clinton got for having a *****. If anything, the media are
biased against "liberals".
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=3542
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=2399
That means very little. I'm sure that there are as many sites out
there pointing out the terrible conservative things that didn't make
the media.
Unless you count the WWW as "media".
The fact that Bush seems to be attacked by the media (god I
hate that word) might have more to do with the fact that attacking a
current president sells more papers that attacking the opposition.
I think people are more aware of the ability of news outlets to slant
material, and there are more outlets which will report from different
viewpoints, so that they have to be more objective about it.
"The media" were all set to give Clinton a pass on Monica until a right-
winger's gossip page broke the story. Then they had to jump on it. I
would have never heard of Drudge except for the buzz that he got *after*
he broke that story.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Imagine if this were a Republican President...!! |
03 Apr 2004 08:02:35 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:10:53 -0800 in episode
<255134c0.0404021910.894d211@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
yangfoo2@yahoo.com (Yang The Almighty):
Imagine if this were a Republican President...
We don't have to. Bush ignored what was going on over there. It's not like
Clinton stayed out and Bush rode in to help. We still hear pretty much
*nothing about what's been going on over there. Despite the Congolian
civil war spreading to Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Zimbabwe, Namibia, Angola
and Sudan. They were calling it "Africa's first world war." Some three
million died.
Bush is *still not helping. It's *still a disaster over there. Despite
peace agreements, the wars are still being carried on at various levels.
You know that rebel forces in Congo are raping women by the hundreds as a
means of terrorizing the population? Has Bush said a word?
So we don't have to wonder, we know. Glass houses you see...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: Imagine if this were a Republican President...!! |
02 Apr 2004 10:43:33 PM |
|
|
Yang The Almighty wrote:
Imagine if this were a Republican President...
Documents obtained using the Freedom of Information act show that
President Bill Clinton ignored the genocide that was going on in
Rwanda,
When Rios Montt of Guatemala lead his army into repeated
mass murders, mass rapes, torture and genocide, the Democrats tried to cut
military aid to Guatemala. Reagan and teh GOP fought them like
rabid raccooons.
True, Clinton sat on his butt and did little./
Which is why second time around, I voted for Nader.
But Clinton did not actively battle to keep the Hutus killing
murdering and torturing. Reagan and the GOP did.
They are 100 times worse.
Reagan and Bush supported, Pol Pot, Rios Montt, D'Aubisson of El Salvador,
the ex-Somoza guards that changed their name to Contras, Saddam Hussein,
and more.
So did the GOP leadership of the House and Senate and GOP rank and file,
the Christian leaders on many 'conservative' denominations and radio hate
mongerers like Rush, Ollie North et all. You did not see these things
argued against by the right winger pundits,columnists, editors of right
winger rags, or editors of foolish papers like the Wall Street Journal
or Washing Times.
The right has wallowed in genocide, torture and mass murder.
The fact that you rant about Clinton, but do not include teh equally bad or
worse thinsg the GOP and the right has done for 25 years makes you as bad
as Clinton.
You care about it only for extremist far right Clinton bashing.
You don't care a pointy rat turd about the equally bad things done
in teh name of the US by the right since Nixon and Kissinger.
You are every bit as bad as Clinton because you are a mere far right
extremist propagandist. Touting the far right despite the fact that they
are worse and have a longer history of such things.
Nixon ignored the murder and torture of the Greek generals who
overthrew that democracy, the invasion of Indonesian in West Timor,
he instituted the secret bombing of Cambodia that killed hundreds of
thousands of innocents, and ignore teh torture and murder of Pinochet's
death squads.
And not a single far right ***** monkey, such as yourself, has ever cared
about any of this.
Yet you want us to take you seriously when you rant about Clinton ignoring
the longer and worse record of conservatism and the GOP.
Many of the right wing shits in teh House and Senate who were
all for these things over 35 years, are still in the Congress, and YOU want
us to keep voting for GOP shits like them.
You are evil. And stupid.
And I have to call you on it.
Go away evil little right winger ***** monkey.
Supporter of mass murderers and liars.
Like Bush, who lied us into a war.
Stupid, useless far right air theive.
--
"I was not prepared to shoot my eardrum out with a shotgun
in order to get a deferment. Nor was I willing to go to
Canada. So I chose to better myself and learn to fly airplanes."
- George W. Bush May 1984 to the Houston Chronicle
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eyeball Kid" |
|
| Title: Re: Imagine if this were a Republican President...!! |
03 Apr 2004 01:12:01 PM |
|
|
In article <406e583e$0$17090$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.com>, wbarwell
<wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
Yang The Almighty wrote:
Imagine if this were a Republican President...
Documents obtained using the Freedom of Information act show that
President Bill Clinton ignored the genocide that was going on in
Rwanda,
When Rios Montt of Guatemala lead his army into repeated
mass murders, mass rapes, torture and genocide, the Democrats tried to cut
military aid to Guatemala. Reagan and teh GOP fought them like
rabid raccooons.
True, Clinton sat on his butt and did little./
Which is why second time around, I voted for Nader.
But Clinton did not actively battle to keep the Hutus killing
murdering and torturing. Reagan and the GOP did.
They are 100 times worse.
Reagan and Bush supported, Pol Pot, Rios Montt, D'Aubisson of El Salvador,
the ex-Somoza guards that changed their name to Contras, Saddam Hussein,
and more.
So did the GOP leadership of the House and Senate and GOP rank and file,
the Christian leaders on many 'conservative' denominations and radio hate
mongerers like Rush, Ollie North et all. You did not see these things
argued against by the right winger pundits,columnists, editors of right
winger rags, or editors of foolish papers like the Wall Street Journal
or Washing Times.
The right has wallowed in genocide, torture and mass murder.
The fact that you rant about Clinton, but do not include teh equally bad or
worse thinsg the GOP and the right has done for 25 years makes you as bad
as Clinton.
You care about it only for extremist far right Clinton bashing.
You don't care a pointy rat turd
Now THAT'S a descriptor!!
about the equally bad things done
in teh name of the US by the right since Nixon and Kissinger.
You are every bit as bad as Clinton because you are a mere far right
extremist propagandist. Touting the far right despite the fact that they
are worse and have a longer history of such things.
Nixon ignored the murder and torture of the Greek generals who
overthrew that democracy, the invasion of Indonesian in West Timor,
he instituted the secret bombing of Cambodia that killed hundreds of
thousands of innocents, and ignore teh torture and murder of Pinochet's
death squads.
And not a single far right ***** monkey, such as yourself, has ever cared
about any of this.
Yet you want us to take you seriously when you rant about Clinton ignoring
the longer and worse record of conservatism and the GOP.
Many of the right wing shits in teh House and Senate who were
all for these things over 35 years, are still in the Congress, and YOU want
us to keep voting for GOP shits like them.
You are evil. And stupid.
And I have to call you on it.
Go away evil little right winger ***** monkey.
Supporter of mass murderers and liars.
Like Bush, who lied us into a war.
Stupid, useless far right air theive.
--
Free humor. Whenever you want. http://www.psmueller.com
"It would be a mistake for the United States Senate to allow any kind of human
cloning to come out of that chamber."‹G.W. Bush, Wash. D.C., April 10, 2002
"Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision that he
makes and we should just support that."- Britany Spears, 9/2003
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
