| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"towelie" |
| Date: |
02 Apr 2005 01:09:42 AM |
| Object: |
Impending Catholic schism? |
I've read reports of disagreements on who will succeed John Paul II. I was
discussing this with a friend, and we both agreed that this might cause a
huge split in the Catholic church. What do you think?
--
Beliefs are dangerous. Beliefs allow the mind to stop functioning.
A non-functioning mind is clinically dead. Believe in nothing.
- Maynard James Keenan
aa #2133
ap #19
.
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
02 Apr 2005 11:50:20 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 12:29:53 +0000 (UTC), "kathryn"
<bob@bobbybobbobthebobster.com> wrote:
I think I don't care too much
The pope is a puppet
It's unlikely there's going to be some one radical who does something
like....endorse the use of condoms (pathetic that that would be radical
really)
That would truly be radical as it's against what God has given us.
No, "god" sent us condoms. Just as "he" sent us the feeding tube, as you
said about the Terri Schiavo case.
Remember?
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
--
Olrik
aa #1981
Qualified SMASH member
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
06 Apr 2005 05:25:38 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:50:20 -0500, Olrik <olrik666@yahoo_BACON!_.com> wrote:
That would truly be radical as it's against what God has given us.
No, "god" sent us condoms.
No, can't. Those stand in opposition to that which God did give us.
Just as "he" sent us the feeding tube, as you
said about the Terri Schiavo case.
Remember?
Feeding tubes kept her alive until God was ready for her. She did her part.
Thanks you, Terrri.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "towelie" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
06 Apr 2005 03:24:32 PM |
|
|
TV's duke wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:50:20 -0500, Olrik <olrik666@yahoo_BACON!_.com>
wrote:
That would truly be radical as it's against what God has given us.
No, "god" sent us condoms.
No, can't. Those stand in opposition to that which God did give us.
Just as "he" sent us the feeding tube, as you
said about the Terri Schiavo case.
Remember?
Feeding tubes kept her alive until God was ready for her. She did her
part.
Thanks you, Terrri.
Thank her for what?
--
Beliefs are dangerous. Beliefs allow the mind to stop functioning.
A non-functioning mind is clinically dead. Believe in nothing.
- Maynard James Keenan
The belief in the Christian god... is an appalling nightmare. I reject
the notion that the whole universe was created by this kind of evil
creature who would create such a thing. - Anthony Flew
aa #2133
ap #19
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
02 Apr 2005 12:11:43 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 12:29:53 +0000 (UTC), "kathryn"
<bob@bobbybobbobthebobster.com> wrote:
I think I don't care too much
The pope is a puppet
It's unlikely there's going to be some one radical who does something
like....endorse the use of condoms (pathetic that that would be
radical really)
That would truly be radical as it's against what God has given us.
Earl would have said the same thing about touching the host or meat on
Friday when it was forbidden.
The RCC has an explanation that would allow birth control in marriage. It
will be allowed sooner than later.
This and allowing all priests to marry (some places they can) would bring a
lot of catholics back here and even in Europe.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
06 Apr 2005 05:23:01 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 18:11:43 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
It's unlikely there's going to be some one radical who does something
like....endorse the use of condoms (pathetic that that would be
radical really)
That would truly be radical as it's against what God has given us.
Earl would have said the same thing about touching the host or meat on
Friday when it was forbidden.
As far as I know, those really were man made regulations.
The RCC has an explanation that would allow birth control in marriage. It
will be allowed sooner than later.
Birth control is already allowed. It's called abstinence during fertility
periods.
This and allowing all priests to marry (some places they can) would bring a
lot of catholics back here and even in Europe.
We already know you would dump your values for your comfort, mikey.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "towelie" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
06 Apr 2005 01:47:39 PM |
|
|
TV's duke wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 18:11:43 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
It's unlikely there's going to be some one radical who does something
like....endorse the use of condoms (pathetic that that would be
radical really)
That would truly be radical as it's against what God has given us.
Earl would have said the same thing about touching the host or meat on
Friday when it was forbidden.
As far as I know, those really were man made regulations.
The RCC has an explanation that would allow birth control in marriage. It
will be allowed sooner than later.
Birth control is already allowed. It's called abstinence during fertility
periods.
Abstinence is no more birth control than starvation is weight control.
--
Beliefs are dangerous. Beliefs allow the mind to stop functioning.
A non-functioning mind is clinically dead. Believe in nothing.
- Maynard James Keenan
The belief in the Christian god... is an appalling nightmare. I reject
the notion that the whole universe was created by this kind of evil
creature who would create such a thing. - Anthony Flew
aa #2133
ap #19
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
06 Apr 2005 11:36:59 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 18:11:43 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
It's unlikely there's going to be some one radical who does
something like....endorse the use of condoms (pathetic that that
would be radical really)
That would truly be radical as it's against what God has given us.
Earl would have said the same thing about touching the host or meat
on Friday when it was forbidden.
As far as I know, those really were man made regulations.
Which means that man can damn somebody to hell according to their whims.
Birth control is based on onanism and I don't see people going to hell for
not marrying their dead brothers wife. It's also OT and you have said that
there is a new covenant. (Not that they agree with you but you should try to
be consistent.)
The RCC has an explanation that would allow birth control in
marriage. It will be allowed sooner than later.
Birth control is already allowed. It's called abstinence during
fertility periods.
Actually Onanism is allowed also.
This and allowing all priests to marry (some places they can) would
bring a lot of catholics back here and even in Europe.
We already know you would dump your values for your comfort, mikey.
Not my values Earl, the excommunicated, but those of your church.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
06 Apr 2005 12:02:46 PM |
|
|
"Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:LeU4e.19332$zl.11352@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
duke wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 18:11:43 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
It's unlikely there's going to be some one radical who does
something like....endorse the use of condoms (pathetic that that
would be radical really)
That would truly be radical as it's against what God has given us.
Earl would have said the same thing about touching the host or meat
on Friday when it was forbidden.
As far as I know, those really were man made regulations.
Which means that man can damn somebody to hell according to their whims.
Birth control is based on onanism and I don't see people going to hell for
not marrying their dead brothers wife. It's also OT and you have said that
there is a new covenant. (Not that they agree with you but you should try
to
be consistent.)
The RCC has an explanation that would allow birth control in
marriage. It will be allowed sooner than later.
Birth control is already allowed. It's called abstinence during
fertility periods.
Actually Onanism is allowed also.
This and allowing all priests to marry (some places they can) would
bring a lot of catholics back here and even in Europe.
We already know you would dump your values for your comfort, mikey.
Not my values Earl, the excommunicated, but those of your church.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jeremy Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
02 Apr 2005 10:38:20 AM |
|
|
("towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com>):
I've read reports of disagreements on who will succeed John Paul II. I was
discussing this with a friend, and we both agreed that this might cause a
huge split in the Catholic church. What do you think?
I imagine that any big decision in such a huge organization would
cause disagreement.
--
Jeremy Martin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
02 Apr 2005 12:05:09 PM |
|
|
On 02 Apr 2005, Jeremy Martin dropped trou, farted, whirled, then
shouted:
("towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com>):
I've read reports of disagreements on who will succeed John Paul II.
I was discussing this with a friend, and we both agreed that this
might cause a huge split in the Catholic church. What do you think?
I imagine that any big decision in such a huge organization would
cause disagreement.
--
Jeremy Martin
JEREMY!
Where have you been hiding?
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
Plonked by Jason Gastrich for all eternity...
______________
As you were, I was. As I am, you will be.
--- Hunter S. Thompson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeremy Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
02 Apr 2005 12:23:56 PM |
|
|
(Vic Sagerquist <address@withheld.com>):
On 02 Apr 2005, Jeremy Martin dropped trou, farted, whirled, then
shouted:
("towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com>):
I've read reports of disagreements on who will succeed John Paul II.
I was discussing this with a friend, and we both agreed that this
might cause a huge split in the Catholic church. What do you think?
I imagine that any big decision in such a huge organization would
cause disagreement.
--
Jeremy Martin
JEREMY!
Where have you been hiding?
Oh, here and there. Covert operations for the EAC took a lot of
my time. ;)
--
Jeremy Martin
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
04 Apr 2005 04:24:25 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:23:56 -0600, Jeremy Martin
<harhar@pirates-ahoy.com> wrote:
(Vic Sagerquist <address@withheld.com>):
On 02 Apr 2005, Jeremy Martin dropped trou, farted, whirled, then
shouted:
("towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com>):
I've read reports of disagreements on who will succeed John Paul II.
I was discussing this with a friend, and we both agreed that this
might cause a huge split in the Catholic church. What do you think?
I imagine that any big decision in such a huge organization would
cause disagreement.
JEREMY!
Where have you been hiding?
Oh, here and there. Covert operations for the EAC took a lot of
my time. ;)
Yeah, but your timing was off on the Pope's death by almost 20 hours.
He was supposed to croak on April First.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Walter Bushell" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
05 Apr 2005 02:23:02 PM |
|
|
In article <31c3519nokgaurik7t7p8jihvkreoo30tc@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:23:56 -0600, Jeremy Martin
<harhar@pirates-ahoy.com> wrote:
(Vic Sagerquist <address@withheld.com>):
On 02 Apr 2005, Jeremy Martin dropped trou, farted, whirled, then
shouted:
("towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com>):
I've read reports of disagreements on who will succeed John Paul II.
I was discussing this with a friend, and we both agreed that this
might cause a huge split in the Catholic church. What do you think?
I imagine that any big decision in such a huge organization would
cause disagreement.
JEREMY!
Where have you been hiding?
Oh, here and there. Covert operations for the EAC took a lot of
my time. ;)
Yeah, but your timing was off on the Pope's death by almost 20 hours.
He was supposed to croak on April First.
In a life of over 80 years that is pretty good accuracy.
--
Guns don't kill people; automobiles kill people.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
06 Apr 2005 08:24:28 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:23:02 -0400, Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com>
wrote:
In article <31c3519nokgaurik7t7p8jihvkreoo30tc@4ax.com>,
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:23:56 -0600, Jeremy Martin
<harhar@pirates-ahoy.com> wrote:
(Vic Sagerquist <address@withheld.com>):
On 02 Apr 2005, Jeremy Martin dropped trou, farted, whirled, then
shouted:
("towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com>):
I've read reports of disagreements on who will succeed John Paul II.
I was discussing this with a friend, and we both agreed that this
might cause a huge split in the Catholic church. What do you think?
I imagine that any big decision in such a huge organization would
cause disagreement.
JEREMY!
Where have you been hiding?
Oh, here and there. Covert operations for the EAC took a lot of
my time. ;)
Yeah, but your timing was off on the Pope's death by almost 20 hours.
He was supposed to croak on April First.
In a life of over 80 years that is pretty good accuracy.
Not good enough.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Korbin Dallas" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
03 Apr 2005 01:51:10 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 01:09:42 -0600, towelie wrote:
I've read reports of disagreements on who will succeed John Paul II. I was
discussing this with a friend, and we both agreed that this might cause a
huge split in the Catholic church. What do you think?
I really don't care what happens to the Catholic Church.
I don't see it returning to the power levels it had had during the
remainder of my lifetime.
--
Korbin Dallas
The name was changed to protect the guilty.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Arch Atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
02 Apr 2005 01:31:41 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 01:09:42 -0600, "towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com>
wrote:
I've read reports of disagreements on who will succeed John Paul II. I was
discussing this with a friend, and we both agreed that this might cause a
huge split in the Catholic church. What do you think?
Let's hope so. Apparently there are 113 possible successors...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "L. Raymond" |
|
| Title: Re: Impending Catholic schism? |
02 Apr 2005 03:26:19 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 01:09:42 -0600, towelie wrote:
I've read reports of disagreements on who will succeed John Paul II. I was
discussing this with a friend, and we both agreed that this might cause a
huge split in the Catholic church. What do you think?
I seriously doubt it. While I do think there may be an impending
schism, it won't be over the pope's successor, at least not directly.
There have been rumblings from American Catholics about breaking off and
forming their own sect under the Archbishop of New York, like the CoE
and Canterbury. If they decide to do that, it may be because of an
impolitic pope but he'd have to do something to rile them up, something
more active than just being elected.
--
L. Raymond
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
