In the News: Darby trustees postpone origins decision



 Religions > Atheism > In the News: Darby trustees postpone origins decision

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Jason Spaceman"
Date: 29 Jan 2004 03:29:51 AM
Object: In the News: Darby trustees postpone origins decision
From the article:
--------------------------------------
DARBY - A relay filibuster Wednesday night forced the Darby school
board to postpone its decision on whether to adopt the controversial
objective origins policy.
Dozens of people spoke about concerns, and in support of the policy
that would broaden the school's science curriculum.
Board Chairwoman Gina Schallenberger continued the discussion until
Monday at 7 p.m. because the stenographer recording the comments
couldn't continue past 9:30 p.m.
Community members voiced concern and support for the policy at special
meetings Monday and Wednesday, and trustees heard legal arguments for
and against the policy change. The policy is based on a push to teach
intelligent design theory - a biological origins theory that assumes
there is a designer of the biological world.
David DeWolf, law professor at Gonzaga Law School told trustees that
fears of a lawsuit and loss of accreditation are unfounded.
County attorney James McCubbin and Elizabeth Kaleva, attorney for the
Montana School Boards Association, strongly advised against the
adoption, citing a likelihood that the school district would be sued
and may lose accreditation.
-----------------------------------------
Read the rest at
http://www.ravallinews.com/articles/2004/01/29/news/news02.txt
J. Spaceman
.

User: "catshark"

Title: Re: In the News: Darby trustees postpone origins decision 29 Jan 2004 07:29:37 AM
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:29:51 +0000 (UTC), Jason Spaceman
<I@Eat.Spammers.For.Breakfast.com> wrote:

From the article:
--------------------------------------
DARBY - A relay filibuster Wednesday night forced the Darby school
board to postpone its decision on whether to adopt the controversial
objective origins policy.

Dozens of people spoke about concerns, and in support of the policy
that would broaden the school's science curriculum.

Board Chairwoman Gina Schallenberger continued the discussion until
Monday at 7 p.m. because the stenographer recording the comments
couldn't continue past 9:30 p.m.

Community members voiced concern and support for the policy at special
meetings Monday and Wednesday, and trustees heard legal arguments for
and against the policy change. The policy is based on a push to teach
intelligent design theory - a biological origins theory that assumes
there is a designer of the biological world.

David DeWolf, law professor at Gonzaga Law School told trustees that
fears of a lawsuit and loss of accreditation are unfounded.

DeWolf is the Discovery Institute's legal strategist and has co-authored
their brief for the teaching ID in public schools. You can get a copy
here:
Teaching the Origins Controversy: Science, Or Religion, Or Speech?
<http://law.gonzaga.edu/people/dewolf/>
It's been a while since I've read it (given the DI's seeming abandonment of
attempts to get ID actually taught) but it boils down to "if it only walks
like a duck but doesn't quack like one, it ain't necessarily a duck".
DeWolf's presence in Darby may signal that they haven't abandoned getting
ID affirmatively taught.
Incidently, the lawsuit mentioned in the article isn't an anticipated ACLU
or other anti-ID suit, per se. The County attorney was warning that the
Board shouldn't change the curriculum without first receiving approval from
the State because it could lose accreditation and, therefore, State and
Federal funds, which could lead to taxpayer suits. That would primarily
depend on the political reaction of the Montana Department of Education, so
DeWolf might be right about that. But it is disingenuous at best, if that
is what he did, for him to assure the Board that there will be *no*
litigation should they go ahead and approve the teaching of ID in public
schools.
The people of Darby might want to re-read the story of Abraham and Isaac.
[...]
---------------
J. Pieret
---------------
LAWYER, n.
One skilled in circumvention of the law.
- Ambrose Bierce -
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
In the News: Darby couple readies 'objective origins' lawsuit
In the News: Darby adopts origins policy
In the News: State education official pans Darby's origins decision
In the News: Objecting to 'origins': Darby student protest highlights concern over new policy
talk.origins banned content thread : are JW's creationists?
Re: Talk.Origins Banned Subject: Humans are half Banana, a Budikka Hole
In the News: Schools should not limit origins-of-life discussions to evolution, Republican legislators say
OT: Index to Creationist Claims up at talk.origins
Talk.Origins Content Moderation works like this...
Another Talk.Origins Banned thread: Do scientist agree on the missing link? Solly Zuckerman comments
Re: Questions for Talk.origins regarding free speech
talk.origins banned subject: Dinosaur planet\ real scientist..scott sampsom comments
talk.origins banned subject: Arthur C. Clarke on science and God
NOVA: Origins
The origins of the 1st Amendment establishment clause (1789)
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER