Religions > Atheism > In the News: Scientists Seek Place for God While Embracing Reason
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Jason Spaceman" |
| Date: |
04 Jan 2004 12:37:04 PM |
| Object: |
In the News: Scientists Seek Place for God While Embracing Reason |
From the article:
---------------------------
That is also the view of Michael Behe (pronounced BEE-hee), professor of
biochemistry at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, and one of the stars of
Intelligent Design. Behe, the author of "Darwin's Black Box: The
Biochemical Challenge to Evolution," told the Science Speaks symposium that
although Darwin's theory explains some things, it does not explain
everything that is attributed to it.
"I just think it's bad science. It's extremely overblown in the claims made
for it," he said.
---------------------------
Read it at http://www.theledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040104
NEWS/401040402 or at http://tinyurl.com/36kmt
J. Spaceman
.
|
|
| User: "Ron Okimoto" |
|
| Title: Re: In the News: Scientists Seek Place for God While Embracing Reason |
05 Jan 2004 12:19:34 PM |
|
|
Jason Spaceman wrote:
From the article:
---------------------------
That is also the view of Michael Behe (pronounced BEE-hee), professor of
biochemistry at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, and one of the stars of
Intelligent Design. Behe, the author of "Darwin's Black Box: The
Biochemical Challenge to Evolution," told the Science Speaks symposium that
although Darwin's theory explains some things, it does not explain
everything that is attributed to it.
"I just think it's bad science. It's extremely overblown in the claims made
for it," he said.
---------------------------
Read it at http://www.theledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040104
NEWS/401040402 or at http://tinyurl.com/36kmt
J. Spaceman
This was good for a laugh. If the claims for the theories of biological
evolution are overblown and bad science just think what he says about
IC and ID. What are adjectives that are worse than bad and overblown?
***** and ridiculous could be his choices, but somehow
I doubt that he applies the same standards to his own beliefs.
Ron Okimoto
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "\Rev Dr\ Lenny Flank" |
|
| Title: Re: In the News: Scientists Seek Place for God While Embracing Reason |
04 Jan 2004 12:42:11 PM |
|
|
Jason Spaceman wrote:
From the article:
---------------------------
That is also the view of Michael Behe (pronounced BEE-hee), professor of
biochemistry at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, and one of the stars of
Intelligent Design. Behe, the author of "Darwin's Black Box: The
Biochemical Challenge to Evolution," told the Science Speaks symposium that
although Darwin's theory explains some things, it does not explain
everything that is attributed to it.
"I just think it's bad science. It's extremely overblown in the claims made
for it," he said.
---------------------------
Unlike ID "theory", which explains . . . uh . . . nothing.
===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"
Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank
DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: In the News: Scientists Seek Place for God While Embracing Reason |
04 Jan 2004 06:01:48 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 18:42:11 +0000 (UTC), "\"Rev Dr\" Lenny Flank"
<lflank_nospam@ij.net> posted to alt.atheism:
Jason Spaceman wrote:
From the article:
---------------------------
That is also the view of Michael Behe (pronounced BEE-hee), professor of
biochemistry at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, and one of the stars of
Intelligent Design. Behe, the author of "Darwin's Black Box: The
Biochemical Challenge to Evolution," told the Science Speaks symposium that
although Darwin's theory explains some things, it does not explain
everything that is attributed to it.
"I just think it's bad science. It's extremely overblown in the claims made
for it," he said.
---------------------------
Unlike ID "theory", which explains . . . uh . . . nothing.
Or IC "theory", which explains even less.
--
"I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, but
not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and actions of human beings."
-A. Einstein (1929 -- Einstein Archive 33-272)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Desertphile" |
|
| Title: Re: In the News: Scientists Seek Place for God While Embracing Reason |
05 Jan 2004 05:20:32 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 18:37:04 +0000 (UTC), Jason Spaceman
<I@eat.spammers.for.breakfast.com> wrote:
From the article:
---------------------------
That is also the view of Michael Behe (pronounced BEE-hee), professor of
biochemistry at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, and one of the stars of
Intelligent Design. Behe, the author of "Darwin's Black Box: The
Biochemical Challenge to Evolution," told the Science Speaks symposium that
although Darwin's theory explains some things, it does not explain
everything that is attributed to it.
"I just think it's bad science. It's extremely overblown in the claims made
for it," he said.
---------------------------
Read it at http://www.theledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040104
NEWS/401040402 or at http://tinyurl.com/36kmt
cary.mcmullen@theledger.com is the address to write to.
J. Spaceman
--
"To the bat tank!" --- Tank Girl
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: In the News: Scientists Seek Place for God While Embracing Reason |
04 Jan 2004 04:15:11 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 18:37:04 +0000 (UTC), Jason Spaceman
<I@eat.spammers.for.breakfast.com> wrote:
From the article:
---------------------------
That is also the view of Michael Behe (pronounced BEE-hee), professor of
biochemistry at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, and one of the stars of
Intelligent Design. Behe, the author of "Darwin's Black Box: The
Biochemical Challenge to Evolution," told the Science Speaks symposium that
although Darwin's theory explains some things, it does not explain
everything that is attributed to it.
"I just think it's bad science. It's extremely overblown in the claims made
for it," he said.
Would Behe care to let us know what the theory of ID is, then, so we
can judge it on its scientific merits?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
