| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"maff" |
| Date: |
14 Apr 2005 10:29:35 AM |
| Object: |
India's China war |
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113471126.538350.326390@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 6:32 PM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113468342.743355.166280@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 5:45 PM:
India, and in China against Christians.
What about the Christians? If the church is registered with the government,
there seems to be no problem.
Of course, the Chinese government don't seem to accept allegiance to another
country/ state.
Apparently, you are in the same type of denial that Kaz is in. Pathetic.
So why aren't you approaching the Chinese and or International Criminal
Court instead of spouting Bushie fascist apologetics?
Why should I approach the Chinese courts? Why should I expect justice from
them?
Also, why should I approach the International Criminal Court, since China is
not a participating state? You did know they were not a participating state,
didn't you? If not, why not?
It has been ratified by more than 66 countries. Not participating is
no longer an option. It isn't about countries. It's about criminals.
What is this nonsense about "Bushie fascist apologetics"? I am sure that in
your seizures you think you meant something there, but your mangling of the
English language makes it hard to tell.
That's for the courts to decide.
.
|
|
| User: "Jim Walsh" |
|
| Title: Re: India's China war |
14 Apr 2005 10:45:00 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:29:35 -0700, maff thought carefully and wrote:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
Also, why should I approach the International Criminal Court, since
China is not a participating state? You did know they were not a
participating state, didn't you? If not, why not?
It has been ratified by more than 66 countries. Not participating is no
longer an option. It isn't about countries. It's about criminals.
LOL. The claim that the ICC can and will arrest and try PRC government
officials is ludicrous. You don't believe it and you should know better
than try to foist this silly lie off on adults.
--
Love, Jim
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
|
| User: "maff" |
|
| Title: Re: India's China war |
14 Apr 2005 09:12:35 PM |
|
|
Jim Walsh wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:29:35 -0700, maff thought carefully and wrote:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
Also, why should I approach the International Criminal Court,
since
China is not a participating state? You did know they were not a
participating state, didn't you? If not, why not?
It has been ratified by more than 66 countries. Not participating
is no
longer an option. It isn't about countries. It's about criminals.
LOL. The claim that the ICC can and will arrest and try PRC
government
officials is ludicrous. You don't believe it and you should know
better
than try to foist this silly lie off on adults.
Are you implying Bushie, Zen and Shinto fascists are going aren't going
to be arrested?
--
Love, Jim
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ernest Schaal" |
|
| Title: Re: India's China war |
14 Apr 2005 09:28:18 PM |
|
|
in article 1113513155.526437.280860@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/15/05 6:12 AM:
Jim Walsh wrote: On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:29:35 -0700, maff thought carefully
and wrote:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
Also, why should I approach the International Criminal Court, since China
is not a participating state? You did know they were not a participating
state, didn't you? If not, why not?
It has been ratified by more than 66 countries. Not participating is no
longer an option. It isn't about countries. It's about criminals.
LOL. The claim that the ICC can and will arrest and try PRC government
officials is ludicrous. You don't believe it and you should know better than
try to foist this silly lie off on adults.
Are you implying Bushie, Zen and Shinto fascists are going aren't going to be
arrested?
I am implying that you are completely ignorant of the foundation of the
International Criminal Court and its workings.
I am also imply that you need your medication.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ernest Schaal" |
|
| Title: Re: India's China war |
14 Apr 2005 11:03:11 AM |
|
|
in article pan.2005.04.14.10.44.58.716793@oOKperamNOail.com, Jim Walsh at
jiSPm_walAMsh_iii@oOKperamNOail.com wrote on 4/14/05 7:45 PM:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:29:35 -0700, maff thought carefully and wrote:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
Also, why should I approach the International Criminal Court, since
China is not a participating state? You did know they were not a
participating state, didn't you? If not, why not?
It has been ratified by more than 66 countries. Not participating is no
longer an option. It isn't about countries. It's about criminals.
LOL. The claim that the ICC can and will arrest and try PRC government
officials is ludicrous. You don't believe it and you should know better
than try to foist this silly lie off on adults.
Agreed that the claim is ludicrous, but I don't know if he doesn't believe
it. Considering some of the things he posted, he may be stupid enough to
believe something like that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "maff" |
|
| Title: Re: India's China war |
14 Apr 2005 08:59:27 PM |
|
|
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article pan.2005.04.14.10.44.58.716793@oOKperamNOail.com, Jim
Walsh at
jiSPm_walAMsh_iii@oOKperamNOail.com wrote on 4/14/05 7:45 PM:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:29:35 -0700, maff thought carefully and
wrote:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
Also, why should I approach the International Criminal Court,
since
China is not a participating state? You did know they were not a
participating state, didn't you? If not, why not?
It has been ratified by more than 66 countries. Not participating
is no
longer an option. It isn't about countries. It's about criminals.
LOL. The claim that the ICC can and will arrest and try PRC
government
officials is ludicrous. You don't believe it and you should know
better
than try to foist this silly lie off on adults.
Agreed that the claim is ludicrous, but I don't know if he doesn't
believe
it. Considering some of the things he posted, he may be stupid enough
to
believe something like that.
So are you saying Bushie fascists aren't going to be indicted? The
courts are only the first step. Bushie fascists, organizations and
businesses are going to be identified throughout the Union and the
World. You can always do busiess with fellow fascists but your market
share will head South.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ernest Schaal" |
|
| Title: Re: India's China war |
14 Apr 2005 10:52:25 AM |
|
|
in article 18510aff.0504140229.1c9f5140@posting.google.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 7:29 PM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113471126.538350.326390@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 6:32 PM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113468342.743355.166280@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 5:45 PM:
India, and in China against Christians.
What about the Christians? If the church is registered with the
government,
there seems to be no problem.
Of course, the Chinese government don't seem to accept allegiance to
another
country/ state.
Apparently, you are in the same type of denial that Kaz is in. Pathetic.
So why aren't you approaching the Chinese and or International Criminal
Court instead of spouting Bushie fascist apologetics?
Why should I approach the Chinese courts? Why should I expect justice from
them?
Also, why should I approach the International Criminal Court, since China is
not a participating state? You did know they were not a participating state,
didn't you? If not, why not?
It has been ratified by more than 66 countries. Not participating is
no longer an option. It isn't about countries. It's about criminals.
Sorry, but you don't understand international law, do you? Clearly you
aren't a lawyer, otherwise you would know better.
What is this nonsense about "Bushie fascist apologetics"? I am sure that in
your seizures you think you meant something there, but your mangling of the
English language makes it hard to tell.
That's for the courts to decide.
Decide what? How should they be able to decipher your twisted thoughts?
.
|
|
|
| User: "ggg" |
|
| Title: Re: India's China war |
14 Apr 2005 03:49:36 PM |
|
|
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 18510aff.0504140229.1c9f5140@posting.google.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 7:29 PM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113471126.538350.326390@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 6:32 PM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113468342.743355.166280@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 5:45 PM:
India, and in China against Christians.
What about the Christians? If the church is registered with the
government,
there seems to be no problem.
Of course, the Chinese government don't seem to accept allegiance to
another
country/ state.
Apparently, you are in the same type of denial that Kaz is in. Pathetic.
So why aren't you approaching the Chinese and or International Criminal
Court instead of spouting Bushie fascist apologetics?
Why should I approach the Chinese courts? Why should I expect justice from
them?
Also, why should I approach the International Criminal Court, since China is
not a participating state? You did know they were not a participating state,
didn't you? If not, why not?
It has been ratified by more than 66 countries. Not participating is
no longer an option. It isn't about countries. It's about criminals.
Sorry, but you don't understand international law, do you? Clearly you
aren't a lawyer, otherwise you would know better.
there are really bad lawyers out there so that doesn't mean anything
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ernest Schaal" |
|
| Title: Re: India's China war |
14 Apr 2005 07:49:30 PM |
|
|
in article kiw7e.1808$yl6.622517@twister.nyc.rr.com, ggg at
goodgutgut@yahoo.com wrote on 4/15/05 12:49 AM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 18510aff.0504140229.1c9f5140@posting.google.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 7:29 PM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113471126.538350.326390@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 6:32 PM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113468342.743355.166280@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 5:45 PM:
India, and in China against Christians.
What about the Christians? If the church is registered with the
government,
there seems to be no problem.
Of course, the Chinese government don't seem to accept allegiance to
another
country/ state.
Apparently, you are in the same type of denial that Kaz is in. Pathetic.
So why aren't you approaching the Chinese and or International Criminal
Court instead of spouting Bushie fascist apologetics?
Why should I approach the Chinese courts? Why should I expect justice from
them?
Also, why should I approach the International Criminal Court, since China
is not a participating state? You did know they were not a participating
state, didn't you? If not, why not?
It has been ratified by more than 66 countries. Not participating is
no longer an option. It isn't about countries. It's about criminals.
Sorry, but you don't understand international law, do you? Clearly you
aren't a lawyer, otherwise you would know better.
there are really bad lawyers out there so that doesn't mean anything
I agree that there are really bad lawyers out there, just like there are in
any profession. But your statement that it doesn't mean anything is
nonsense.
There are really bad doctors out there but that doesn't mean that a
non-doctor knows the law as well as a doctor, nor does it mean that there
isn't a body of knowledge called medicine.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ggg" |
|
| Title: Re: India's China war |
14 Apr 2005 08:44:08 PM |
|
|
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article kiw7e.1808$yl6.622517@twister.nyc.rr.com, ggg at
goodgutgut@yahoo.com wrote on 4/15/05 12:49 AM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 18510aff.0504140229.1c9f5140@posting.google.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 7:29 PM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113471126.538350.326390@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 6:32 PM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113468342.743355.166280@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 5:45 PM:
India, and in China against Christians.
What about the Christians? If the church is registered with the
government,
there seems to be no problem.
Of course, the Chinese government don't seem to accept allegiance to
another
country/ state.
Apparently, you are in the same type of denial that Kaz is in. Pathetic.
So why aren't you approaching the Chinese and or International Criminal
Court instead of spouting Bushie fascist apologetics?
Why should I approach the Chinese courts? Why should I expect justice from
them?
Also, why should I approach the International Criminal Court, since China
is not a participating state? You did know they were not a participating
state, didn't you? If not, why not?
It has been ratified by more than 66 countries. Not participating is
no longer an option. It isn't about countries. It's about criminals.
Sorry, but you don't understand international law, do you? Clearly you
aren't a lawyer, otherwise you would know better.
there are really bad lawyers out there so that doesn't mean anything
I agree that there are really bad lawyers out there, just like there are in
any profession. But your statement that it doesn't mean anything is
nonsense.
There are really bad doctors out there but that doesn't mean that a
non-doctor knows the law as well as a doctor, nor does it mean that there
isn't a body of knowledge called medicine.
If he had a law degree, it wouldn't stop him from posting material just
because he would know better because he was a lawyer. There are plenty
of posters who do know better but know they can get away with posting
loaded comments and misinformation.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ernest Schaal" |
|
| Title: Re: India's China war |
14 Apr 2005 08:59:16 PM |
|
|
in article sCA7e.6976$n93.2986@twister.nyc.rr.com, ggg at
goodgutgut@yahoo.com wrote on 4/15/05 5:44 AM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article kiw7e.1808$yl6.622517@twister.nyc.rr.com, ggg at
goodgutgut@yahoo.com wrote on 4/15/05 12:49 AM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 18510aff.0504140229.1c9f5140@posting.google.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 7:29 PM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113471126.538350.326390@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 6:32 PM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113468342.743355.166280@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 5:45 PM:
India, and in China against Christians.
What about the Christians? If the church is registered with the
government,
there seems to be no problem.
Of course, the Chinese government don't seem to accept allegiance to
another
country/ state.
Apparently, you are in the same type of denial that Kaz is in.
Pathetic.
So why aren't you approaching the Chinese and or International Criminal
Court instead of spouting Bushie fascist apologetics?
Why should I approach the Chinese courts? Why should I expect justice
from
them?
Also, why should I approach the International Criminal Court, since China
is not a participating state? You did know they were not a participating
state, didn't you? If not, why not?
It has been ratified by more than 66 countries. Not participating is
no longer an option. It isn't about countries. It's about criminals.
Sorry, but you don't understand international law, do you? Clearly you
aren't a lawyer, otherwise you would know better.
there are really bad lawyers out there so that doesn't mean anything
I agree that there are really bad lawyers out there, just like there are in
any profession. But your statement that it doesn't mean anything is
nonsense.
There are really bad doctors out there but that doesn't mean that a
non-doctor knows the law as well as a doctor, nor does it mean that there
isn't a body of knowledge called medicine.
If he had a law degree, it wouldn't stop him from posting material just
because he would know better because he was a lawyer. There are plenty
of posters who do know better but know they can get away with posting
loaded comments and misinformation.
That still doesn't change the fact that the information Maff posted was
nonsense.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ggg" |
|
| Title: Re: India's China war |
14 Apr 2005 09:24:03 PM |
|
|
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article sCA7e.6976$n93.2986@twister.nyc.rr.com, ggg at
goodgutgut@yahoo.com wrote on 4/15/05 5:44 AM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article kiw7e.1808$yl6.622517@twister.nyc.rr.com, ggg at
goodgutgut@yahoo.com wrote on 4/15/05 12:49 AM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 18510aff.0504140229.1c9f5140@posting.google.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 7:29 PM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113471126.538350.326390@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com, maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 6:32 PM:
Ernest Schaal wrote:
in article 1113468342.743355.166280@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,
maff at
maff91@yahoo.com wrote on 4/14/05 5:45 PM:
India, and in China against Christians.
What about the Christians? If the church is registered with the
government,
there seems to be no problem.
Of course, the Chinese government don't seem to accept allegiance to
another
country/ state.
Apparently, you are in the same type of denial that Kaz is in.
Pathetic.
So why aren't you approaching the Chinese and or International Criminal
Court instead of spouting Bushie fascist apologetics?
Why should I approach the Chinese courts? Why should I expect justice
from
them?
Also, why should I approach the International Criminal Court, since China
is not a participating state? You did know they were not a participating
state, didn't you? If not, why not?
It has been ratified by more than 66 countries. Not participating is
no longer an option. It isn't about countries. It's about criminals.
Sorry, but you don't understand international law, do you? Clearly you
aren't a lawyer, otherwise you would know better.
there are really bad lawyers out there so that doesn't mean anything
I agree that there are really bad lawyers out there, just like there are in
any profession. But your statement that it doesn't mean anything is
nonsense.
There are really bad doctors out there but that doesn't mean that a
non-doctor knows the law as well as a doctor, nor does it mean that there
isn't a body of knowledge called medicine.
If he had a law degree, it wouldn't stop him from posting material just
because he would know better because he was a lawyer. There are plenty
of posters who do know better but know they can get away with posting
loaded comments and misinformation.
That still doesn't change the fact that the information Maff posted was
nonsense.
I have to agree. His posts are confusing but a law degree is no cure all.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
