intelligent design



 Religions > Atheism > intelligent design

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "myk1957"
Date: 25 Nov 2005 02:36:49 AM
Object: intelligent design
The debate on whether "intelligent design" should be taught superior
to evolution, equal to evolution, or even at all as opposed to
evolution, is just in a word....STUPID!
1) Intelligent design is based on.....well, nothing but political
desire.
2) Even if evolution, or shall we say parts of it, is just a theory,
that theory is based on fact, not supposition.
Those that advocate the intelligent design as a serious subject for
students are just endorsing dogmatic forced religious indoctrination.
The religious right are out of control. They have abandoned logic and
responsibility.
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
In the News: Bill proposes teaching of 'intelligent design' alongside evolution
Re: Intelligent Design gets SLAMMED bad, by science org.
In the News: 'Intelligent Design' Rivals Evolution in Ohio High Schools
Op-Ed: To teach science, try focusing on Intelligent Design
Re: An Intelligent Design Rant for Christopher A. Lee (Re: RefutingPaley -- 200 years And Counting)
Dover, PA will teach "intelligent design"
In the News: Evolution, 'intelligent design' share deskspace
In the News: Students differ on intelligent design
Scientists improve God's "intelligent design" massively
In the News: Equal time for "intelligent design" legislation in New York
In the News: 'Intelligent design' debate crowds school board election ballot
WingNutDaily: Smithsonian backs off intelligent design film
Frist Backs 'Intelligent Design' Teaching
Utah, School board: Intelligent design isn't
Indiana: GOP lawmakers want schools to teach 'intelligent design'
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER