| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Harlow V. A. Campbell" |
| Date: |
13 Jan 2006 12:54:52 PM |
| Object: |
Is Europe Smartening Up ? |
(CNN) -- President Bush, in a joint appearance with German Chancellor
Angela Merkel at the White House on Friday, said that Iran, "armed with
a nuclear weapon, poses a grave threat to the security of the world."
Merkel said it was essential that as many nations as possible take a
common position against Iran's nuclear activities. "We certainly will
not be intimidated by a country such as Iran," she said.
<<<SNIP>>>
I say a massive strike on any and all nuke making facilities
in Iran. ***** the UN...Do it now.
.
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Europe Smartening Up ? |
14 Jan 2006 02:51:08 PM |
|
|
"Harlow V. A. Campbell" <harlowcampbell@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137178492.058555.94570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
(CNN) -- President Bush, in a joint appearance with German Chancellor
Angela Merkel at the White House on Friday, said that Iran, "armed with
a nuclear weapon, poses a grave threat to the security of the world."
Merkel said it was essential that as many nations as possible take a
common position against Iran's nuclear activities. "We certainly will
not be intimidated by a country such as Iran," she said.
<<<SNIP>>>
I say a massive strike on any and all nuke making facilities
in Iran. ***** the UN...Do it now.
Yeah cause killing the entire planet is the best option.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Shippey" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Europe Smartening Up ? |
14 Jan 2006 08:26:24 PM |
|
|
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"Harlow V. A. Campbell" <harlowcampbell@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137178492.058555.94570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
(CNN) -- President Bush, in a joint appearance with German Chancellor
Angela Merkel at the White House on Friday, said that Iran, "armed with
a nuclear weapon, poses a grave threat to the security of the world."
Merkel said it was essential that as many nations as possible take a
common position against Iran's nuclear activities. "We certainly will
not be intimidated by a country such as Iran," she said.
<<<SNIP>>>
I say a massive strike on any and all nuke making facilities
in Iran. ***** the UN...Do it now.
Yeah cause killing the entire planet is the best option.
No, but stopping people from a fanatical wing of a religion that teaches
that they go to "paradise" if they die for the cause....... stopping those
idiots from getting nukes is important. So, if they get nukes and decide
to go to paradise to collect their virgins, and destroy Israel (as they
have openly said they want to do).... if that happens what will you say
then hmmmm? One way or another, we need to take out the capability of
these fanatical nuts, now. Negotiaions have failed, might be time to send
some of them to get their virgins now, before they develop nukes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Contact" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Europe Smartening Up ? |
14 Jan 2006 09:02:16 PM |
|
|
As Pink Floyd said "is there anybody OUT THERE?"
"Mark Shippey" <colonel@anti-grey.net> wrote in message
news:43c9b2d0$0$1762$8b463f8a@news.nationwide.net...
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"Harlow V. A. Campbell" <harlowcampbell@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137178492.058555.94570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
(CNN) -- President Bush, in a joint appearance with German Chancellor
Angela Merkel at the White House on Friday, said that Iran, "armed with
a nuclear weapon, poses a grave threat to the security of the world."
Merkel said it was essential that as many nations as possible take a
common position against Iran's nuclear activities. "We certainly will
not be intimidated by a country such as Iran," she said.
<<<SNIP>>>
I say a massive strike on any and all nuke making facilities
in Iran. ***** the UN...Do it now.
Yeah cause killing the entire planet is the best option.
No, but stopping people from a fanatical wing of a religion that teaches
that they go to "paradise" if they die for the cause....... stopping those
idiots from getting nukes is important. So, if they get nukes and decide
to go to paradise to collect their virgins, and destroy Israel (as they
have openly said they want to do).... if that happens what will you say
then hmmmm? One way or another, we need to take out the capability of
these fanatical nuts, now. Negotiaions have failed, might be time to send
some of them to get their virgins now, before they develop nukes.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "maff" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Europe Smartening Up ? |
14 Jan 2006 10:53:49 PM |
|
|
Mark Shippey wrote:
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"Harlow V. A. Campbell" <harlowcampbell@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137178492.058555.94570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
(CNN) -- President Bush, in a joint appearance with German Chancellor
Angela Merkel at the White House on Friday, said that Iran, "armed with
a nuclear weapon, poses a grave threat to the security of the world."
Merkel said it was essential that as many nations as possible take a
common position against Iran's nuclear activities. "We certainly will
not be intimidated by a country such as Iran," she said.
<<<SNIP>>>
I say a massive strike on any and all nuke making facilities
in Iran. ***** the UN...Do it now.
Yeah cause killing the entire planet is the best option.
No, but stopping people from a fanatical wing of a religion that teaches
that they go to "paradise" if they die for the cause....... stopping those
idiots from getting nukes is important. So, if they get nukes and decide
to go to paradise to collect their virgins, and destroy Israel (as they
have openly said they want to do).... if that happens what will you say
then hmmmm? One way or another, we need to take out the capability of
these fanatical nuts, now. Negotiaions have failed, might be time to send
some of them to get their virgins now, before they develop nukes.
Bible Belt will be nuked first.
Christians -- Not All Bad!
http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=15152
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Europe Smartening Up ? |
15 Jan 2006 11:46:48 AM |
|
|
On 15 Jan 2006 02:26:24 GMT, Mark Shippey <colonel@anti-grey.net> wrote
in alt.atheism
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"Harlow V. A. Campbell" <harlowcampbell@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137178492.058555.94570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
(CNN) -- President Bush, in a joint appearance with German Chancellor
Angela Merkel at the White House on Friday, said that Iran, "armed with
a nuclear weapon, poses a grave threat to the security of the world."
Merkel said it was essential that as many nations as possible take a
common position against Iran's nuclear activities. "We certainly will
not be intimidated by a country such as Iran," she said.
<<<SNIP>>>
I say a massive strike on any and all nuke making facilities
in Iran. ***** the UN...Do it now.
Yeah cause killing the entire planet is the best option.
No, but stopping people from a fanatical wing of a religion that teaches
that they go to "paradise" if they die for the cause....... stopping those
idiots from getting nukes is important.
Bush already has them.
[]
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Shippey" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Europe Smartening Up ? |
15 Jan 2006 05:37:27 PM |
|
|
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On 15 Jan 2006 02:26:24 GMT, Mark Shippey <colonel@anti-grey.net> wrote
in alt.atheism
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"Harlow V. A. Campbell" <harlowcampbell@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137178492.058555.94570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
(CNN) -- President Bush, in a joint appearance with German Chancellor
Angela Merkel at the White House on Friday, said that Iran, "armed with
a nuclear weapon, poses a grave threat to the security of the world."
Merkel said it was essential that as many nations as possible take a
common position against Iran's nuclear activities. "We certainly will
not be intimidated by a country such as Iran," she said.
<<<SNIP>>>
I say a massive strike on any and all nuke making facilities
in Iran. ***** the UN...Do it now.
Yeah cause killing the entire planet is the best option.
No, but stopping people from a fanatical wing of a religion that teaches
that they go to "paradise" if they die for the cause....... stopping those
idiots from getting nukes is important.
Bush already has them.
Good one liner, but if you can't do better than this in relation to
fanatical terrrorists (who would kill your relatives just as soon as look
at them), maybe you should look for work as a stand-up-comic. Trust me on
this one..... terrorists love people like some of you posters..... it's a
clear sign of weakness in their enemies.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Europe Smartening Up ? |
20 Jan 2006 10:48:17 AM |
|
|
On 15 Jan 2006 23:37:27 GMT, Mark Shippey <colonel@anti-grey.net> wrote
in alt.atheism
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On 15 Jan 2006 02:26:24 GMT, Mark Shippey <colonel@anti-grey.net> wrote
in alt.atheism
kathryn <nospam@here.com> wrote:
"Harlow V. A. Campbell" <harlowcampbell@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1137178492.058555.94570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
(CNN) -- President Bush, in a joint appearance with German Chancellor
Angela Merkel at the White House on Friday, said that Iran, "armed with
a nuclear weapon, poses a grave threat to the security of the world."
Merkel said it was essential that as many nations as possible take a
common position against Iran's nuclear activities. "We certainly will
not be intimidated by a country such as Iran," she said.
<<<SNIP>>>
I say a massive strike on any and all nuke making facilities
in Iran. ***** the UN...Do it now.
Yeah cause killing the entire planet is the best option.
No, but stopping people from a fanatical wing of a religion that teaches
that they go to "paradise" if they die for the cause....... stopping those
idiots from getting nukes is important.
Bush already has them.
Good one liner, but if you can't do better than this in relation to
fanatical terrrorists (who would kill your relatives just as soon as look
at them), maybe you should look for work as a stand-up-comic.
Like I said. Bush already has them and he meets the criteria you
stated. There's lots of Christians who would kill you and your
relatives just as soon as look at them.
Trust me on this one..... terrorists love people like some of you posters..... it's a
clear sign of weakness in their enemies.
Terrorists like Bush, yes.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Shippey" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Europe Smartening Up ? |
20 Jan 2006 10:54:49 PM |
|
|
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
Terrorists like Bush, yes.
No, terrorists like suckers who show clear signs of weakness.... trust
me pal, they would kill you and everyone in your family in a split second
if they could and believe it, they're trying to learn how to do it in
bigger numbers. You don't understand that, you are a sucker. And if you
think they don't want to do it, well, you are weak. They SAY publically
that is what they want to do. And given an chance, they will. And they
just love to see their enemies weak like so many people posting in these
groups..... that's what they are counting on in the long run.... weak,
spoiled people who, in their comfortable little lives, are too obtuse to
see what is coming down. Nobody with any sense wants any kind of war, but
terrorists don't understand anything but force.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Europe Smartening Up ? |
21 Jan 2006 02:55:00 PM |
|
|
On 21 Jan 2006 04:54:49 GMT, Mark Shippey <colonel@anti-grey.net> wrote
in alt.atheism
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
Terrorists like Bush, yes.
No, terrorists like suckers who show clear signs of weakness.... trust
me pal, they would kill you and everyone in your family in a split second
if they could and believe it, they're trying to learn how to do it in
bigger numbers. You don't understand that, you are a sucker. And if you
think they don't want to do it, well, you are weak. They SAY publically
that is what they want to do. And given an chance, they will. And they
just love to see their enemies weak like so many people posting in these
groups..... that's what they are counting on in the long run.... weak,
spoiled people who, in their comfortable little lives, are too obtuse to
see what is coming down. Nobody with any sense wants any kind of war, but
terrorists don't understand anything but force.
That's what I said. Terrorists like Bush don't understand anything but
force. Do at least *try* to keep up.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Twittering One" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Europe Smartening Up ? |
22 Jan 2006 11:12:11 PM |
|
|
That's what I said.
Did you mean it?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Shippey" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Europe Smartening Up ? |
22 Jan 2006 11:10:37 PM |
|
|
stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
That's what I said. Terrorists like Bush don't understand anything but
force. Do at least *try* to keep up.
Islamic terrorist just love wackos like you... and let's just hope your
relative aren't someday their innocent victims because of fools like you
who play word games and show pathethic weakness in public. They love ya!
You, are exactly what the Islamic fascists love, a duped enemy.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re:Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
13 Jan 2006 02:18:14 AM |
|
|
In article <1137178492.058555.94570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
harlowcampbell@gmail.com says...
I say a massive strike on any and all nuke making facilities
in Iran. ***** the UN...Do it now.
You're the one who needs to smarten up, dumbass. First of all, you're
the same kind of Strangelovian fuckweed who probably advocated a first
strike against the Soviets. Policies like yours would have effectively
destroyed all meaningful life on earth. So it's little surprise that
people don't take rabid dogs like yourself seriously.
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent. Assured Destruction by other WMD possessing
countries still render Iranian nukes unusable even if given to
terrorists, since Americans have already displayed a penchant for
fabricating whatever necessary "evidence" or "terrorist links" to justify
the military action they wish to take.
Most of the resurrected neocon nuke hysteria is based upon pure
mathematical illiteracy. The probability that Iran ever could or would
do something significantly destructive to the United States with a nuke
is vanishingly small.
Now maybe if you were a little smarter then you would realize the the
"nuke program" is just a pretext that the US and Europe use to air other
legitimate grievances we have with Iran like their Hezbollah activities,
for example. But don't be a chump and tell me that you're honestly
afraid of some little firecracker nuke that the Iranians might slap
together.
And no, we shouldn't "***** the UN". Ultimately the mature route to
"world peace" is to empower the UN as a world government to arbitrate
disputes in the same way that the federal government arbitrates disputes
between states in the US.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "H. Bosch" |
|
| Title: Re: Re:Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
14 Jan 2006 01:00:07 PM |
|
|
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e311034e7520def9896eb@news.readfreenews.net...
In article
<1137178492.058555.94570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
harlowcampbell@gmail.com says...
I say a massive strike on any and all nuke making
facilities
in Iran. ***** the UN...Do it now.
You're the one who needs to smarten up, dumbass.
First of all, you're
the same kind of Strangelovian fuckweed who probably
advocated a first
strike against the Soviets. Policies like yours
would have effectively
destroyed all meaningful life on earth. So it's
little surprise that
people don't take rabid dogs like yourself seriously.
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even
with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent. Assured Destruction by
other WMD possessing
countries still render Iranian nukes unusable even if
given to
terrorists, since Americans have already displayed a
penchant for
fabricating whatever necessary "evidence" or
"terrorist links" to justify
the military action they wish to take.
Most of the resurrected neocon nuke hysteria is based
upon pure
mathematical illiteracy. The probability that Iran
ever could or would
do something significantly destructive to the United
States with a nuke
is vanishingly small.
Now maybe if you were a little smarter then you would
realize the the
"nuke program" is just a pretext that the US and
Europe use to air other
legitimate grievances we have with Iran like their
Hezbollah activities,
for example. But don't be a chump and tell me that
you're honestly
afraid of some little firecracker nuke that the
Iranians might slap
together.
And no, we shouldn't "***** the UN". Ultimately the
mature route to
"world peace" is to empower the UN as a world
government to arbitrate
disputes in the same way that the federal government
arbitrates disputes
between states in the US.
Are you really stupid enough to believe that Bull *****?
Or are you just a simple minded liberal that thinks
Iran would not supply nukes to terrorists?
You must have been sucking ***** during 9/11.
H
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim K." |
|
| Title: Re: Re:Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
13 Jan 2006 05:53:57 PM |
|
|
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e311034e7520def9896eb@news.readfreenews.net...
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent.
I've just made a value judgment on your IQ based on that statement.
It's not flattering.
.
|
|
|
| User: "H. Bosch" |
|
| Title: Re: Re:Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
14 Jan 2006 01:03:55 PM |
|
|
"Tim K." <timkozz@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:p4Xxf.1006$Zj7.545@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e311034e7520def9896eb@news.readfreenews.net...
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even
with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent.
I've just made a value judgment on your IQ based on
that statement.
It's not flattering.
You are saying that your judgment is not flattering?
Then why make yourself look like a damn fool? Just
don't make any judgments, it could be dangerous to your
health if you drive an automobile in traffic.
H.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim K." |
|
| Title: Re: Re:Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
15 Jan 2006 08:06:02 PM |
|
|
"H. Bosch" <hbosch@charter.net> wrote in message
news:fWbyf.8309$5g1.6706@fe02.lga...
"Tim K." <timkozz@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:p4Xxf.1006$Zj7.545@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e311034e7520def9896eb@news.readfreenews.net...
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even
with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent.
I've just made a value judgment on your IQ based on
that statement.
It's not flattering.
You are saying that your judgment is not flattering?
Then why make yourself look like a damn fool? Just
don't make any judgments, it could be dangerous to your
health if you drive an automobile in traffic.
Read it again. You might get it then.
Idiot
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "maff" |
|
| Title: Re: Re:Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
14 Jan 2006 10:34:35 PM |
|
|
Tim K. wrote:
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e311034e7520def9896eb@news.readfreenews.net...
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent.
I've just made a value judgment on your IQ based on that statement.
It's not flattering.
Constitution of the Confederate States of America
http://americancivilwar.com/documents/confederate_constitution.html
March 11,1861
We, the people of the Confederate States, each State acting in its
sovereign and independent character, in order to form a permanent
federal government, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity,
and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our
posterity~invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God~do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the Confederate States of America.
Christian atrocities
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/2b62a1f5e94cbbbd
Christians -- Not All Bad!
http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=15152
John Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave,
John Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave,
John Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave,
His soul is marching on.
CHORUS:
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
His soul is marching on.
He's gone to be a soldier in the army of the Lord,
He's gone to be a soldier in the army of the Lord,
He's gone to be a soldier in the army of the Lord,
His soul is marching on!
John Brown's knapsack is strapped upon his back,
John Brown's knapsack is strapped upon his back,
John Brown's knapsack is strapped upon his back,
His soul is marching on!
His pet lambs will meet him on the way,
His pet lambs will meet him on the way,
His pet lambs will meet him on the way,
They go marching on!
They will hang Jeff Davis to a sour apple tree,
They will hang Jeff Davis to a sour apple tree,
They will hang Jeff Davis to a sour apple tree,
As they march along!
Now, three rousing cheers for the Union,
Now, three rousing cheers for the Union,
Now, three rousing cheers for the Union,
As we are marching on!
John Brown
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/eae1991d04555965
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim K." |
|
| Title: Re: Re:Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
15 Jan 2006 08:05:41 PM |
|
|
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1137299675.465972.170020@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
You're pretty weird.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ugly Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Re:Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
16 Jan 2006 08:46:42 PM |
|
|
"Tim K." <timkozz@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:VbDyf.1804$vG.647@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1137299675.465972.170020@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
You're pretty weird.
Nearly everyone's weird here. It's usenet for christs sake! How
the hell are ya, Tim, and how're things down there at the cape?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim K." |
|
| Title: Re: Re:Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
20 Jan 2006 03:45:19 PM |
|
|
"Ugly Bob" <ugly_bob42@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:yeadnYCm76kIx1HeRVn-oQ@comcast.com...
"Tim K." <timkozz@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:VbDyf.1804$vG.647@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
"maff" <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1137299675.465972.170020@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
You're pretty weird.
Nearly everyone's weird here. It's usenet for christs sake! How
the hell are ya, Tim, and how're things down there at the cape?
Doing well, thanks. Had a hell of a launch yesterday with the Atlas. I
work just across the lagoon from SLC 41 and it was a real filling-rattler
for a bit there. Hopefully we'll start stacking for 121 here soon. We need
to start flying again!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
14 Jan 2006 01:02:16 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:18:14 -0700, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com>
wrote in alt.atheism
In article <1137178492.058555.94570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
harlowcampbell@gmail.com says...
I say a massive strike on any and all nuke making facilities
in Iran. ***** the UN...Do it now.
[]
And no, we shouldn't "***** the UN". Ultimately the mature route to
"world peace" is to empower the UN as a world government to arbitrate
disputes in the same way that the federal government arbitrates disputes
between states in the US.
Disagree. It's the best way to really ***** things up.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a cornucopia of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Shippey" |
|
| Title: Re: Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
13 Jan 2006 11:41:13 PM |
|
|
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent.
You paying any attention at all to the news?........... the head wacko
in Iran has recently called openly for the destruction of Israel. You
willing to bet that leaders who follow afaction of a religion that
believes that you go to paradise and get some nice virgins if you die for
the cause..... you willing to gamble they might not use those nukes? Your
wrong, millions die. Why take that chance? Take out the nuke program now,
one way or another.
.
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
14 Jan 2006 09:33:21 AM |
|
|
In article <43c88ef9$0$1765$8b463f8a@news.nationwide.net>, colonel@anti-
grey.net says...
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent.
You paying any attention at all to the news?
More importantly, unlike you, I actually understand what it means. Hint:
FUX propaganda is not news.
.......... the head wacko
in Iran has recently called openly for the destruction of Israel.
Then you obviously haven't been paying attention for decades. Iran,
among many middle eastern countries, has frequently called for the
destruction of Israel. It would only seriously qualify as news if they
*didn't* call for the destruction of Israel. So don't give me some
boilerplate ***** like that. Besides, as I clearly pointed out,
Israel can take care of itself. Why the hell should americans be so
worried about Israeli security, when the Israeli government has long
since ceased being a strategic asset for us and is now a decidedly
strategic liability.
You
willing to bet
Absolutely and the smart money has always been on regimes not being crazy
enough to use nukes. First strikers like yourself were wrong about the
cold war and you're wrong now. But even now, your "attack first" policy
is premised upon the implicit assumption that Iran won't be able to fight
back. Yet if they were really crazy, they would retaliate with the
chemical weapons that they do possess. BTW, why hasn't Iran attacked
Israel with its chemical weapons already if they are so crazy and don't
care about dying? Why hasn't Iran given chemical weapons to terrorists
to carry out attacks on the west?
that leaders who follow afaction of a religion that
believes that you go to paradise
That's not just a factional interpretation. If the best you have is that
muslims believe in rewards in the afterlife, just like many other
religions, then your criminal "first strike" policy is even more vacuous
than usual. I'm afraid that you'll have to do better than (1) they wear
a towel on their head and (2) they're muslims and (3) they might get a
firecracker sized nuke some day.
and get some nice virgins if you die for
the cause..... you willing to gamble
Definitely, and if you were smart, which you're apparently not, you would
realize that it's the safest bet going. Whether Iran has a nuke or not
is utterly irrelevant, despite your irrational and childlike hysteria.
In all likelihood we could not destroy every facility that the Iranians
use for nuke enrichment. Modern cyclotrons can produce the necessary
material in short order and they can be hidden throughout the country, so
your policy is ineffective, among other things.
they might not use those nukes? Your
wrong, millions die.
*****. You might want to look up actual casualty figures for nukes
instead of your hysterical propaganda *****. If you then qualify that
with the vanishingly small probability that they would be able to deliver
the munition to the desired target without being intercepted you have an
expected number of casualties around zero. The present neoconazi nuke
fear mongering is premised upon mathematical illiteracy. Oh and don't
even bother telling me your fantasies about how they are going to go
straight to h-bomb technology.
Why take that chance?
That's essentially the argument used for a first strike against the
soviet union in the 1960-1980's. Apparently the only thing you guys
believe in recycling is ***** and rhetoric. First off, as I said, the
actual probability of Iran being able to inflict any casualties on the US
is vanishingly small, especially with the trivially small bombs that they
would likely be able to produce. Step away from the Tom Clancey book.
Secondly, we actually couldn't prevent Iran or many other countries from
acquiring nukes, in some fashion, even if we wanted to. The solution is
to remove the desire of the Iranians to attack us. It worked with the
Russians and the Chinese. It's what will work here too.
Take out the nuke program now,
You can't. Period. Even if you wanted to do it, it wouldn't work, so
stop acting like a petulant little child about it. The Iranians aren't
stupid. They know we've been flying thousands of missions over their
country looking for potential target sites. If you honestly believe that
it's just a matter of dropping a few bombs on a couple of soft targets
then you're delusional as well as misinformed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "H. Bosch" |
|
| Title: Re: Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
14 Jan 2006 01:08:10 PM |
|
|
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e32c7b05a5293f59896f0@news.readfreenews.net...
In article
<43c88ef9$0$1765$8b463f8a@news.nationwide.net>,
colonel@anti-
grey.net says...
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even
with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent.
You paying any attention at all to the news?
More importantly, unlike you, I actually understand
what it means. Hint:
FUX propaganda is not news.
.......... the head wacko
in Iran has recently called openly for the
destruction of Israel.
Then you obviously haven't been paying attention for
decades. Iran,
among many middle eastern countries, has frequently
called for the
destruction of Israel. It would only seriously
qualify as news if they
*didn't* call for the destruction of Israel. So don't
give me some
boilerplate ***** like that. Besides, as I
clearly pointed out,
Israel can take care of itself. Why the hell should
americans be so
worried about Israeli security, when the Israeli
government has long
since ceased being a strategic asset for us and is
now a decidedly
strategic liability.
You
willing to bet
Absolutely and the smart money has always been on
regimes not being crazy
enough to use nukes. First strikers like yourself
were wrong about the
cold war and you're wrong now. But even now, your
"attack first" policy
is premised upon the implicit assumption that Iran
won't be able to fight
back. Yet if they were really crazy, they would
retaliate with the
chemical weapons that they do possess. BTW, why
hasn't Iran attacked
Israel with its chemical weapons already if they are
so crazy and don't
care about dying? Why hasn't Iran given chemical
weapons to terrorists
to carry out attacks on the west?
that leaders who follow afaction of a religion
that
believes that you go to paradise
That's not just a factional interpretation. If the
best you have is that
muslims believe in rewards in the afterlife, just
like many other
religions, then your criminal "first strike" policy
is even more vacuous
than usual. I'm afraid that you'll have to do better
than (1) they wear
a towel on their head and (2) they're muslims and (3)
they might get a
firecracker sized nuke some day.
and get some nice virgins if you die for
the cause..... you willing to gamble
Definitely, and if you were smart, which you're
apparently not, you would
realize that it's the safest bet going. Whether Iran
has a nuke or not
is utterly irrelevant, despite your irrational and
childlike hysteria.
In all likelihood we could not destroy every facility
that the Iranians
use for nuke enrichment. Modern cyclotrons can
produce the necessary
material in short order and they can be hidden
throughout the country, so
your policy is ineffective, among other things.
they might not use those nukes? Your
wrong, millions die.
*****. You might want to look up actual casualty
figures for nukes
instead of your hysterical propaganda *****. If
you then qualify that
with the vanishingly small probability that they
would be able to deliver
the munition to the desired target without being
intercepted you have an
expected number of casualties around zero. The
present neoconazi nuke
fear mongering is premised upon mathematical
illiteracy. Oh and don't
even bother telling me your fantasies about how they
are going to go
straight to h-bomb technology.
Why take that chance?
That's essentially the argument used for a first
strike against the
soviet union in the 1960-1980's. Apparently the only
thing you guys
believe in recycling is ***** and rhetoric. First
off, as I said, the
actual probability of Iran being able to inflict any
casualties on the US
is vanishingly small, especially with the trivially
small bombs that they
would likely be able to produce. Step away from the
Tom Clancey book.
Secondly, we actually couldn't prevent Iran or many
other countries from
acquiring nukes, in some fashion, even if we wanted
to. The solution is
to remove the desire of the Iranians to attack us.
It worked with the
Russians and the Chinese. It's what will work here
too.
Take out the nuke program now,
You can't. Period. Even if you wanted to do it, it
wouldn't work, so
stop acting like a petulant little child about it.
The Iranians aren't
stupid. They know we've been flying thousands of
missions over their
country looking for potential target sites. If you
honestly believe that
it's just a matter of dropping a few bombs on a
couple of soft targets
then you're delusional as well as misinformed.
Which mental institute are you in that lets you post to
the "net"?
I'll bet that you are a deciple of Wholeflaffer, he was
also insane.
H.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "maff" |
|
| Title: Re: Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
20 Jan 2006 08:07:56 PM |
|
|
Mark Shippey wrote:
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent.
You paying any attention at all to the news?........... the head wacko
in Iran has recently called openly for the destruction of Israel. You
willing to bet that leaders who follow afaction of a religion that
believes that you go to paradise and get some nice virgins if you die for
the cause..... you willing to gamble they might not use those nukes? Your
wrong, millions die. Why take that chance? Take out the nuke program now,
one way or another.
Are you mad? They have been saying that for the last 27 years.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Shippey" |
|
| Title: Re: Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
21 Jan 2006 09:36:01 AM |
|
|
maff <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mark Shippey wrote:
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent.
You paying any attention at all to the news?........... the head wacko
in Iran has recently called openly for the destruction of Israel. You
willing to bet that leaders who follow afaction of a religion that
believes that you go to paradise and get some nice virgins if you die for
the cause..... you willing to gamble they might not use those nukes? Your
wrong, millions die. Why take that chance? Take out the nuke program now,
one way or another.
Are you mad? They have been saying that for the last 27 years.
Are you an idiot? They are near to having WMD, including biological and
chemical..... that changes eveything.
.
|
|
|
| User: "maff" |
|
| Title: Re: Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
21 Jan 2006 02:52:05 PM |
|
|
Mark Shippey wrote:
maff <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mark Shippey wrote:
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent.
You paying any attention at all to the news?........... the head wacko
in Iran has recently called openly for the destruction of Israel. You
willing to bet that leaders who follow afaction of a religion that
believes that you go to paradise and get some nice virgins if you die for
the cause..... you willing to gamble they might not use those nukes? Your
wrong, millions die. Why take that chance? Take out the nuke program now,
one way or another.
Are you mad? They have been saying that for the last 27 years.
Are you an idiot? They are near to having WMD, including biological and
chemical..... that changes eveything.
That's what you were saying before your Iraqi adventure. So are you
going to enlist, Chickenhawk fascist?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Shippey" |
|
| Title: Re: Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
22 Jan 2006 11:01:23 PM |
|
|
maff <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mark Shippey wrote:
maff <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mark Shippey wrote:
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent.
You paying any attention at all to the news?........... the head wacko
in Iran has recently called openly for the destruction of Israel. You
willing to bet that leaders who follow afaction of a religion that
believes that you go to paradise and get some nice virgins if you die for
the cause..... you willing to gamble they might not use those nukes? Your
wrong, millions die. Why take that chance? Take out the nuke program now,
one way or another.
Are you mad? They have been saying that for the last 27 years.
Are you an idiot? They are near to having WMD, including biological and
chemical..... that changes eveything.
That's what you were saying before your Iraqi adventure. So are you
going to enlist, Chickenhawk fascist?
You are an idiot. A duped idiot. Let's hope your realtives don't have to
be the innocent victims of terrorists, just because people like you are
stupid, duped, weak clowns. Terrorists love people like you, it's a sign
of weakness. And they will kill you just as soon as look at you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "maff" |
|
| Title: Re: Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
23 Jan 2006 06:39:22 AM |
|
|
Mark Shippey wrote:
maff <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mark Shippey wrote:
maff <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mark Shippey wrote:
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent.
You paying any attention at all to the news?........... the head wacko
in Iran has recently called openly for the destruction of Israel. You
willing to bet that leaders who follow afaction of a religion that
believes that you go to paradise and get some nice virgins if you die for
the cause..... you willing to gamble they might not use those nukes? Your
wrong, millions die. Why take that chance? Take out the nuke program now,
one way or another.
Are you mad? They have been saying that for the last 27 years.
Are you an idiot? They are near to having WMD, including biological and
chemical..... that changes eveything.
That's what you were saying before your Iraqi adventure. So are you
going to enlist, Chickenhawk fascist?
You are an idiot. A duped idiot. Let's hope your realtives don't have to
be the innocent victims of terrorists, just because people like you are
stupid, duped, weak clowns. Terrorists love people like you, it's a sign
of weakness. And they will kill you just as soon as look at you.
So why aren't you enlisting, Chickenhawk fascist?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Shippey" |
|
| Title: Re: Harlow Campbell needs to smarten up |
23 Jan 2006 11:17:38 PM |
|
|
maff <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mark Shippey wrote:
maff <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mark Shippey wrote:
maff <maff91@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mark Shippey wrote:
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Now as to the actual threat that Iran poses, even with nukes, that threat
is effectively non-existent.
You paying any attention at all to the news?........... the head wacko
in Iran has recently called openly for the destruction of Israel. You
willing to bet that leaders who follow afaction of a religion that
believes that you go to paradise and get some nice virgins if you die for
the cause..... you willing to gamble they might not use those nukes? Your
wrong, millions die. Why take that chance? Take out the nuke program now,
one way or another.
Are you mad? They have been saying that for the last 27 years.
Are you an idiot? They are near to having WMD, including biological and
chemical..... that changes eveything.
That's what you were saying before your Iraqi adventure. So are you
going to enlist, Chickenhawk fascist?
You are an idiot. A duped idiot. Let's hope your realtives don't have to
be the innocent victims of terrorists, just because people like you are
stupid, duped, weak clowns. Terrorists love people like you, it's a sign
of weakness. And they will kill you just as soon as look at you.
So why aren't you enlisting, Chickenhawk fascist?
Age, idiot.
I have younger relatives and friend's kids who are enlisted, idiot. And
they are working hard to make sure dupes don't win the day and we are not
prepared for relgious Islamic nuts with WMD.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
