| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Lionel" |
| Date: |
19 Mar 2005 07:46:45 PM |
| Object: |
Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
.
|
|
| User: "Secular Fundamentalist" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
19 Mar 2005 07:56:09 PM |
|
|
Lionel wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Can't argue with that. Since he doesn't exist, we must be.
--
David Silverman F.L.A.H.N.
aa #2208
.
|
|
|
| User: "Society" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
20 Mar 2005 02:51:40 AM |
|
|
"Secular Fundamentalist" <moc.turtle@eltrut.com> wrote in message
news:U9Wdnf_iIulQHqHfRVnyhA@brightview.com...
Lionel wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry?
When they are cut do they not bleed?
We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Can't argue with that.
I can. Thus you are my inferior in anyone's eyes.
Since he doesn't exist, we must be.
Rather, because He doesn't exist, we must not be.
(Duh.)
Oh, and there's nothing wrong with two men
loving each other. Banging each other, that's
a different issue altogether. Many of my
inferiors confuse "love" with "sex play". Idiots.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
22 Mar 2005 05:29:24 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:51:40 -0800, "Society"
<Society@feminism.is.invalid> wrote:
"Secular Fundamentalist" <moc.turtle@eltrut.com> wrote in message
news:U9Wdnf_iIulQHqHfRVnyhA@brightview.com...
Lionel wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry?
When they are cut do they not bleed?
We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Can't argue with that.
I can. Thus you are my inferior in anyone's eyes.
Oh, lookie, a slack-jawed drooler!
Since he doesn't exist, we must be.
Rather, because He doesn't exist, we must not be.
(Duh.)
Oh, and there's nothing wrong with two men
loving each other. Banging each other, that's
a different issue altogether. Many of my
inferiors confuse "love" with "sex play". Idiots.
No, you're not that evolved.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Secular Fundamentalist" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
20 Mar 2005 10:37:12 AM |
|
|
Society wrote:
"Secular Fundamentalist" <moc.turtle@eltrut.com> wrote in message
news:U9Wdnf_iIulQHqHfRVnyhA@brightview.com...
Lionel wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry?
When they are cut do they not bleed?
We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Can't argue with that.
I can. Thus you are my inferior in anyone's eyes.
Since he doesn't exist, we must be.
Rather, because He doesn't exist, we must not be.
(Duh.)
Oh, and there's nothing wrong with two men
loving each other. Banging each other, that's
a different issue altogether. Many of my
inferiors confuse "love" with "sex play". Idiots.
Who rattled your closet door?
--
David Silverman F.L.A.H.N.
aa #2208
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
19 Mar 2005 09:39:49 PM |
|
|
Lionel wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Who ?
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rodney Kelp" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
20 Mar 2005 04:16:26 AM |
|
|
Men should love each other but not make love to each other.
It is an abomination to lie with a man like you would a woman.
But the bible doesn't mention chicks with dicks otherwise known as trannys.
"Lionel" <stevelionelyoung@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4cfa4559.0503191146.48ea62e4@posting.google.com...
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
20 Mar 2005 05:43:51 AM |
|
|
Rodney Kelp wrote:
Men should love each other but not make love to each other.
It is an abomination to lie with a man like you would a woman.
If you take the literal saying of the phrase as it currently stands.
But, it doesn't say that in the original Hebrew. As it currently
stands, it's a retranslation of a retranslations with the translators
spins on the text. Check your facts before you respond.
But the bible doesn't mention chicks with dicks otherwise known as trannys.
So, they're totally fine, then. ;-)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rick" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
20 Mar 2005 04:31:24 AM |
|
|
Will: "Are you sure this is a gay bar?"
Jack: "It's gay, but only after 9 o'clock."
Will: "Sounds like some guys I know."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jethro" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
19 Mar 2005 08:18:48 PM |
|
|
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Don't understand why so much has to be made about *life choices* when
homosexual behavour seems to have more to do with fetish? (no offense
intended and I'm probably wrong).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
19 Mar 2005 09:59:49 PM |
|
|
"Jethro" <Tall@valleyforge.net> wrote in message
news:nv1p31lb38q4b8u6f2s6eo829s5ojamelk@4ax.com...
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Don't understand why so much has to be made about *life choices* when
homosexual behavour seems to have more to do with fetish? (no offense
intended and I'm probably wrong).
Is there a food you don't like? Did you choose not to like it? Can you
arbitrarily choose TO like it? No.
Then that preference is not a choice, is it?
I suspect the principle holds for sexual preference as well.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
26 Mar 2005 07:06:22 AM |
|
|
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message news:<UMqdnUWpue_NPKHfRVn-ug@io.com>...
"Jethro" <Tall@valleyforge.net> wrote in message
news:nv1p31lb38q4b8u6f2s6eo829s5ojamelk@4ax.com...
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Don't understand why so much has to be made about *life choices* when
homosexual behavour seems to have more to do with fetish? (no offense
intended and I'm probably wrong).
Is there a food you don't like? Did you choose not to like it? Can you
arbitrarily choose TO like it? No.
Then that preference is not a choice, is it?
I suspect the principle holds for sexual preference as well.
So to for acquired taste or learned behavior, and behavour modification, right?
.
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
26 Mar 2005 12:50:57 PM |
|
|
On 25 Mar 2005 23:06:22 -0800, (Peter) wrote:
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message news:<UMqdnUWpue_NPKHfRVn-ug@io.com>...
"Jethro" <Tall@valleyforge.net> wrote in message
news:nv1p31lb38q4b8u6f2s6eo829s5ojamelk@4ax.com...
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Don't understand why so much has to be made about *life choices* when
homosexual behavour seems to have more to do with fetish? (no offense
intended and I'm probably wrong).
Is there a food you don't like? Did you choose not to like it? Can you
arbitrarily choose TO like it? No.
Then that preference is not a choice, is it?
I suspect the principle holds for sexual preference as well.
So to for acquired taste or learned behavior, and behavour modification, right?
Your above sentence is a bit unclear. What exactly are you trying to
say?
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
19 Mar 2005 08:40:34 PM |
|
|
"Jethro" <Tall@valleyforge.net> wrote in message
news:nv1p31lb38q4b8u6f2s6eo829s5ojamelk@4ax.com...
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Don't understand why so much has to be made about *life choices* when
homosexual behavour seems to have more to do with fetish? (no offense
intended and I'm probably wrong).
Yep you would be
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
19 Mar 2005 09:23:28 PM |
|
|
kathryn wrote:
"Jethro" <Tall@valleyforge.net> wrote in message
news:nv1p31lb38q4b8u6f2s6eo829s5ojamelk@4ax.com...
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800,
(Lionel)
wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Don't understand why so much has to be made about *life choices*
when
homosexual behavour seems to have more to do with fetish? (no
offense
intended and I'm probably wrong).
Yep you would be
..... gay? C'mon, men loving other men results in loss of protection and
love for women so of course men who show in/out anal affections for
other men will be bashed, killed, humiliated.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
22 Mar 2005 05:31:34 PM |
|
|
On 19 Mar 2005 13:23:28 -0800, wrote:
kathryn wrote:
"Jethro" <Tall@valleyforge.net> wrote in message
news:nv1p31lb38q4b8u6f2s6eo829s5ojamelk@4ax.com...
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800,
(Lionel)
wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Don't understand why so much has to be made about *life choices*
when
homosexual behavour seems to have more to do with fetish? (no
offense
intended and I'm probably wrong).
Yep you would be
.... gay? C'mon, men loving other men results in loss of protection and
love for women so of course men who show in/out anal affections for
other men will be bashed, killed, humiliated.
Another drooler. Crawl back under your bridge.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
22 Mar 2005 05:30:47 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:18:48 GMT, Jethro <Tall@valleyforge.net> wrote:
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Don't understand why so much has to be made about *life choices* when
homosexual behavour seems to have more to do with fetish? (no offense
intended and I'm probably wrong).
Heterosexual behaviour and homosexual behaviour can have fethish
tendencies. Such need not be the case.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
22 Mar 2005 05:27:58 PM |
|
|
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
But some are more equal than others.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "CB" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
20 Mar 2005 05:18:38 AM |
|
|
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel) wrote:
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
What's your point?
"Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we are here we might as well dance."
Author Unknown
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Boch" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
20 Mar 2005 08:07:15 AM |
|
|
So you photography something?
--
_________________-
BOCH
________________
A+TECH
_________
"Lionel" <stevelionelyoung@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4cfa4559.0503191146.48ea62e4@posting.google.com...
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grizzlie Antagonist" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
20 Mar 2005 12:42:44 AM |
|
|
Yes.
------------------------------------
grizzlieantagonist@yahoo.com
"Ladies and gentlemen - let's have a round of applause for tonight's player of the game - FRAN-CIS-CO SAN-N-N-N-TOS!
- Brian Anthony (P.A. announcer at Grizzlie Stadium), June 11, 2004
"Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites; in proportion as their love of justice is above their rapacity; in proportion as their soundness and sobriety of understanding is above their vanity and presumption; in proportion as they are more disposed to listen to the counsels of the wise and good, in preference to the flattery of knaves. Society cannot exist unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere, and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters."
- Edmund Burke, Letter to a Member of the National Assembly (1791)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jw j" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
19 Mar 2005 11:00:53 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Is it wrong for two men to love each other in what way, and from whose
perspective?
I love my son, and I love my brother. I love half-a-dozen of the men
in my building.
Would I have SEX with any of the above men?
No.
Would I comfort any of them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I pray for them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I go out of my way to do any of them a favor?
Yes. I would and I have.
jw
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
19 Mar 2005 11:22:32 PM |
|
|
Well, that's great.
Your point is fuzzy, though.
jw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Is it wrong for two men to love each other in what way, and from
whose
perspective?
I love my son, and I love my brother. I love half-a-dozen of the men
in my building.
Would I have SEX with any of the above men?
No.
Would I comfort any of them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I pray for them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I go out of my way to do any of them a favor?
Yes. I would and I have.
jw
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Shiv" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
20 Mar 2005 06:35:52 PM |
|
|
jw <j w wrote:
Is it wrong for two men to love each other in what way, and from whose
perspective?
I love my son, and I love my brother. I love half-a-dozen of the men
in my building.
<blah>
jw
Funny how you conveninently missed the rest of Leviticus to come up with
your silly little stance.
25: "If a woman has a discharge of blood for many days, not at the time
of her impurity, or if she has a discharge beyond the time of her
impurity, all the days of the discharge she shall continue in
uncleanness; as in the days of her impurity, she shall be unclean.
28: But if she is cleansed of her discharge, she shall count for herself
seven days, and after that she shall be clean.
29: And on the eighth day she shall take two turtledoves or two young
pigeons, and bring them to the priest, to the door of the tent of meeting.
30: And the priest shall offer one for a sin offering and the other for
a burnt offering; and the priest shall make atonement for her before the
LORD for her unclean discharge.
So tell me, jw, has your wife been following those rules too? Because
it's just as important as the "shalt not layeth with a man" drivel.
The xian stance on homosexuality doesn't even make me roll my eyes
anymore. It's like trying to keep a straight face while watching
retards on fire trying to put themselves out with gasoline.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
25 Mar 2005 11:12:53 PM |
|
|
Shiv <shiv_@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism
Funny how you conveninently missed the rest of Leviticus to come up with
your silly little stance.
25: "If a woman has a discharge of blood for many days, not at the time
of her impurity, or if she has a discharge beyond the time of her
impurity, all the days of the discharge she shall continue in
uncleanness; as in the days of her impurity, she shall be unclean.
28: But if she is cleansed of her discharge, she shall count for herself
seven days, and after that she shall be clean.
29: And on the eighth day she shall take two turtledoves or two young
pigeons, and bring them to the priest, to the door of the tent of meeting.
30: And the priest shall offer one for a sin offering and the other for
a burnt offering; and the priest shall make atonement for her before the
LORD for her unclean discharge.
So after the bloody problem goes away, the priest gets two free
pigeons or turtledoves for doing nothing?
What a scam!
--
Elroy Willis
www.elroysemporium.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jwk" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
21 Mar 2005 12:49:19 AM |
|
|
Shiv wrote:
jw <j w wrote:
Is it wrong for two men to love each other in what way, and from
whose
perspective?
I love my son, and I love my brother. I love half-a-dozen of the
men
in my building.
<blah>
jw
Funny how you conveninently missed the rest of Leviticus to come up
with
your silly little stance.
25: "If a woman has a discharge of blood for many days, not at the
time
of her impurity, or if she has a discharge beyond the time of her
impurity, all the days of the discharge she shall continue in
uncleanness; as in the days of her impurity, she shall be unclean.
28: But if she is cleansed of her discharge, she shall count for
herself
seven days, and after that she shall be clean.
29: And on the eighth day she shall take two turtledoves or two young
pigeons, and bring them to the priest, to the door of the tent of
meeting.
30: And the priest shall offer one for a sin offering and the other
for
a burnt offering;
Because doves make a good meal for a priest.
Why the ***** would a woman need to be forgiven for bleeding?? Didn't
this fucking god *make her bleed according to the same stupid book?
jwk
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "rutman" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
19 Mar 2005 11:04:37 PM |
|
|
what da phuck this has to do with alt.digital. photography?!
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:00:53 -0800, jw <j w<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Is it wrong for two men to love each other in what way, and from whose
perspective?
I love my son, and I love my brother. I love half-a-dozen of the men
in my building.
Would I have SEX with any of the above men?
No.
Would I comfort any of them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I pray for them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I go out of my way to do any of them a favor?
Yes. I would and I have.
jw
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pete D" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
20 Mar 2005 12:24:18 AM |
|
|
You know how it is, first sex with men, then you go buy a Canon 20D or 300D.
"rutman" <elcid2k@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4rcp315euomkpkclteaflmffdggfot64el@4ax.com...
what da phuck this has to do with alt.digital. photography?!
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:00:53 -0800, jw <j w<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Is it wrong for two men to love each other in what way, and from whose
perspective?
I love my son, and I love my brother. I love half-a-dozen of the men
in my building.
Would I have SEX with any of the above men?
No.
Would I comfort any of them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I pray for them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I go out of my way to do any of them a favor?
Yes. I would and I have.
jw
.
|
|
|
| User: "alt" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
20 Mar 2005 11:52:00 PM |
|
|
Pete D wrote:
You know how it is, first sex with men, then you go buy a Canon 20D or
300D.
*splorf* You owe me a new keyboard!!! Where was the C&C on that? ;-)
"rutman" <elcid2k@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4rcp315euomkpkclteaflmffdggfot64el@4ax.com...
what da phuck this has to do with alt.digital. photography?!
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:00:53 -0800, jw <j w<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Is it wrong for two men to love each other in what way, and from whose
perspective?
I love my son, and I love my brother. I love half-a-dozen of the men
in my building.
Would I have SEX with any of the above men?
No.
Would I comfort any of them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I pray for them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I go out of my way to do any of them a favor?
Yes. I would and I have.
jw
--
Donovan Hill
Linux User, Christian, Canadian, and all-around nice guy!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "alt" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
20 Mar 2005 12:15:13 AM |
|
|
rutman wrote:
what da phuck this has to do with alt.digital. photography?!
a cross-posting troll. Common technique of spineless trolls that only look
for thrills and to create an argument instead of debating. This is easily
explained by saying that that person has no real opinion of their own and
wouldn't know one if it crawled into bed and bit them.
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:00:53 -0800, jw <j w<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Is it wrong for two men to love each other in what way, and from whose
perspective?
I love my son, and I love my brother. I love half-a-dozen of the men
in my building.
Would I have SEX with any of the above men?
No.
Would I comfort any of them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I pray for them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I go out of my way to do any of them a favor?
Yes. I would and I have.
jw
--
Donovan Hill
Linux User, Christian, Canadian, and all-around nice guy!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jw j" |
|
| Title: Re: Is it so wrong for two men to love each other?? |
20 Mar 2005 06:19:12 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 23:04:37 GMT, rutman <elcid2k@hotmail.com> wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)
what da phuck this has to do with alt.digital. photography?!
Blame "Lionel" whoever he is.
jw
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:00:53 -0800, jw <j w<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On 19 Mar 2005 11:46:45 -0800, (Lionel)
wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)
When they are sad do they not cry? When they are cut do they not
bleed? We are all equal in the eyes of God.
Is it wrong for two men to love each other in what way, and from whose
perspective?
I love my son, and I love my brother. I love half-a-dozen of the men
in my building.
Would I have SEX with any of the above men?
No.
Would I comfort any of them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I pray for them?
Yes. I would and I have.
Would I go out of my way to do any of them a favor?
Yes. I would and I have.
jw
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Re: The Down Low: Straight Men Having Sex With Other Men
PUBLIC TOILETS GREAT FOR PICKING UP OTHER MEN
Love Bumps And Love Patches Of The Mouth, Lips, Cheeks, Breasts, Back, Bumbies, Legs, Groins, And Other Places In Women And Men, Bumby Fucking Men And Women And Throat Toggling (Stuffing Dicks Down Throats) Men And Women For Love Parties, Ascension a
I saw two married men kissing each other yesterday
OT: trolls and the men who love them
Evil Bible Quote of the Day for Sept. 26 (God Kills Men and Beasts)
Paul claimed women must serve men and remain silent.
Re: Help for Men / Fathers
| How the Little Green Men Met Their Makers
John Kerry is a Traitor To The Vietnam Fighting men!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Evil Bible Quote of the Day for May 29 (Murder Men, Women, and Children)
QUestion abou whether 42 children or "young men" were killed by the bears for mocking a bald guy
Long Hair on Men is WRONG!
Two men face death in Nigeria for having sex
One transgression condemned all men?
|
|
|
