| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Truth Hunter" |
| Date: |
22 Jul 2006 05:30:25 PM |
| Object: |
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
http://www.jewsforjudaism.org
Bumper Sticker
DIVINE INSANITY
God killed himself on the cross to save his own creation fro=ADm his own
wrath! (Author unknown)
One God, father-son-ghost?
Holy Trinity "Me, Myself, and I"
Triune god: "Buy one god, get two free"
There is no copyright to this post or its contents anything can be
taken from this post without permission.
.
|
|
| User: "André Keshave" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
23 Jul 2006 02:48:30 AM |
|
|
"Truth Hunter"
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
You've got your sacrifics all wrong.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "André Keshave" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
23 Jul 2006 02:58:38 AM |
|
|
"Truth Hunter"
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
------
To call cruxifiction an inconvience is a bit of an understatement. One
sees in the Gospels that Jesus also had human feelings and was very
anguished at the idea.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
22 Jul 2006 05:32:13 PM |
|
|
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time.
Good - I hope it haunts you to the grave.
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Greywolf" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
22 Jul 2006 08:20:33 PM |
|
|
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:jHxwg.12925$Ur.11103@bignews7.bellsouth.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time.
Good - I hope it haunts you to the grave.
BAM
Think about it. Seriously.
Jesus was supposed to be 'true' human, but at the same time 'God' incarnate.
If he was 'true' human, how is it that he walked on water, raised people
from the dead, *and*, endowed his *disciples* with the same powers. Sound
like any 'human' *you've* ever encountered? Anyway, I digress.
He came to sacrifice himself for mankind's sins. If he's a deity, could he
possibly really cause himself *that* much pain? And if so, what does that
show you? That the guy was into S&M?
As for redeeming mankind: Couldn't he just have told A&E, 'I forgive you'?
Or just wiggle his nose like Barbara Eden in 'I Dream of Jeannie' and make
mankind 'redeemed' *that* way. Isn't being crucified by the Romans (and
*not* stoned to death by the Jews for his 'blasphemous ways) a little 'over
the top' for a deity? What? Did he think he was in some sort of Passion
Play? (Don't answer that.) C'mon. How ridiculous does it have to get? The
whole Jesus/God 'story' absolutely *reeks* of the absurd. Put a lid on the
thing. It's stinkin' up my house all the way over here in Wisconsin.
Greywolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
22 Jul 2006 10:46:26 PM |
|
|
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12c5jnbhqbid72@corp.supernews.com...
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:jHxwg.12925$Ur.11103@bignews7.bellsouth.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time.
Good - I hope it haunts you to the grave.
BAM
Think about it. Seriously.
Jesus was supposed to be 'true' human, but at the same time 'God'
incarnate. If he was 'true' human, how is it that he walked on water,
raised people from the dead, *and*, endowed his *disciples* with the same
powers. Sound like any 'human' *you've* ever encountered? Anyway, I
digress.
maybe he was taking lessons from talking snakes. I saw a whole bunch of
talking snakes in my yard
yesterday, looked like they were having a dinner party
there was also a talking donkey next door
He came to sacrifice himself for mankind's sins. If he's a deity, could he
possibly really cause himself *that* much pain? And if so, what does that
show you? That the guy was into S&M?
As for redeeming mankind: Couldn't he just have told A&E, 'I forgive you'?
Or just wiggle his nose like Barbara Eden in 'I Dream of Jeannie' and make
mankind 'redeemed' *that* way. Isn't being crucified by the Romans (and
*not* stoned to death by the Jews for his 'blasphemous ways) a little
'over the top' for a deity? What? Did he think he was in some sort of
Passion Play? (Don't answer that.) C'mon. How ridiculous does it have to
get? The whole Jesus/God 'story' absolutely *reeks* of the absurd. Put a
lid on the thing. It's stinkin' up my house all the way over here in
Wisconsin.
Greywolf
The jesus story is pretty bad. pretty absurd when you think about it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steve O" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
22 Jul 2006 06:21:10 PM |
|
|
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:jHxwg.12925$Ur.11103@bignews7.bellsouth.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time.
Good - I hope it haunts you to the grave. *
BAM
Translation- *I'm a clueless idiot who is completely unable or ill equipped
to answer your pertinent question"
--
Steve O
a.a. #2240
"Apparently, as I understand it , I am supposed to repent for being the way
that God made me, and then God will save me from God's wrath?"
.
|
|
|
| User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
22 Jul 2006 06:26:13 PM |
|
|
"Apparently, as I understand it , I am supposed to repent for being the
way that God made me, and then God will save me from God's wrath?"
LMAO. good one.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
23 Jul 2006 01:07:11 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:32:13 -0400, "Shaddup"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote:
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time.
Good - I hope it haunts you to the grave.
Suck a priest, Shaddup.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
22 Jul 2006 05:49:47 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:32:13 -0400, "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote:
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time.
Good - I hope it haunts you to the grave.
Another example of Christian love at its finest.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
22 Jul 2006 06:06:37 PM |
|
|
bam wrote:
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time.
Good - I hope it haunts you to the grave.
Now, how about addressing the entire post? Come on Bam, there has to be
more than non-sequitors in there somewhere.
Let me remind you
If Jesus knew he was the son of God, and that he would die and then rise
from the grave, was that really a sacrifice?
BAM
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "H Dickmann" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
23 Jul 2006 06:07:19 AM |
|
|
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
First, go back in history.
Abraham was so obedient to God that he was prepared to sacrifice his own
son.
As a result, God made an everlasting covenant with Abraham and his
descendent which included the promise of salvation.
While Abraham was obedient to God, his descendents were not. It was time for
a new covenant without breaking the old covenant. Rather than chosing a
godly person like Abraham, God chose his only son as a sacrifice. At the
same time, God had to keep the promise He made to Abraham and his seed.
Therefore, anyone, Jew or Gentile could become a seed of Abraham. By
accepting the Sacrifice of Jesus, we are being adopted by Jesus and through
Him become a seed of Abraham. This is called being born again. ( It had been
prorhezised that God will make the descendents of Abraham as numberous as
the grains of sand)
Was it a real sacrifice?
Jesus was fully human with all the normal human feelings. He could have
chosen to live a relatively peaceful life to an old age with the assurance
that he will be with His Father after dying a natural dead. But like
Abraham, He was obedient to His Father and did His will. He was on a mission
from God to preach God's Kingdom in the face of great opposition. He was
persecuted, He was hated, He was tortured and Crucified with the same
feeling of pain and anguish as any human being and He took all this not for
good people, but for sinners which many of us would describe as scum.
http://www.jewsforjudaism.org
Bumper Sticker
DIVINE INSANITY
God killed himself on the cross to save his own creation from his own
wrath! (Author unknown)
One God, father-son-ghost?
Holy Trinity "Me, Myself, and I"
Triune god: "Buy one god, get two free"
There is no copyright to this post or its contents anything can be
taken from this post without permission.
.
|
|
|
| User: "colp" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
24 Jul 2006 07:20:02 PM |
|
|
H Dickmann wrote:
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
First, go back in history.
Abraham was so obedient to God that he was prepared to sacrifice his own
son.
Yes.
As a result, God made an everlasting covenant with Abraham and his
descendent which included the promise of salvation.
Did the Abrahamic covenant really include a promise of salvation?
References, plase.
While Abraham was obedient to God, his descendents were not. It was time for
a new covenant without breaking the old covenant.
O.K.
Rather than chosing a
godly person like Abraham, God chose his only son as a sacrifice.
False.
At the
same time, God had to keep the promise He made to Abraham and his seed.
Therefore, anyone, Jew or Gentile could become a seed of Abraham.
False.
By
accepting the Sacrifice of Jesus, we are being adopted by Jesus and through
Him become a seed of Abraham.
False.
This is called being born again.
False.
( It had been
prorhezised that God will make the descendents of Abraham as numberous as
the grains of sand)
True.
Was it a real sacrifice?
No. The atoning sacrifices of Judaism never included human sacrifice.
Jesus was fully human with all the normal human feelings. He could have
chosen to live a relatively peaceful life to an old age with the assurance
that he will be with His Father after dying a natural dead. But like
Abraham, He was obedient to His Father and did His will. He was on a mission
from God to preach God's Kingdom in the face of great opposition. He was
persecuted, He was hated,
True.
He was tortured and Crucified with the same
feeling of pain and anguish as any human being and He took all this not for
good people, but for sinners which many of us would describe as scum.
According to Paul this was the case, but there are major problems with
the story, particularly with the idea of taking the word of a lying
Pharisee on the sacrificial nature of a man being tortured to death.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
22 Jul 2006 09:25:47 PM |
|
|
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
It ain't!
Now Prometheus, on the other hand, he knew the meaning of sacrifice! Having
your liver torn out by vultures everyday, that's a sacrifice!
Here's a partial list of words that Christians don't know the meaning of:
1. Gift. According to Christians, a gift is something that requires that the
giftee worship the giver.
2. Sacrifice. According to Christians, a sacrifice is surrendering something
and then getting it back, and becoming master of the universe as a special
bonus.
3. Punishment. According to Christians, punishment is something that someone
else suffers for your wrongdoing.
I'm sure there's many others.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
22 Jul 2006 05:57:31 PM |
|
|
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed christain
morons
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
22 Jul 2006 10:22:02 PM |
|
|
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed christain
morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter Terry" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
23 Jul 2006 05:42:05 AM |
|
|
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:0XBwg.28479$cu1.704@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed christain
morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
I give the man a 10 out of 10 for sense of humour.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
22 Jul 2006 10:50:24 PM |
|
|
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:0XBwg.28479$cu1.704@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed christain
morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
BAM
translation: christians have no answer for the huge amount of horseshit in
the bible.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
23 Jul 2006 11:21:42 AM |
|
|
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:4mCwg.3447$bP5.3060@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:0XBwg.28479$cu1.704@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed
christain morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
BAM
translation: christians have no answer for the huge amount of horseshit in
the bible.
And you have no explanation for anything - the universe, the purpose of your
existence, what's good and evil, for example.
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
23 Jul 2006 03:52:17 PM |
|
|
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:WlNwg.18704$Nt.13659@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:4mCwg.3447$bP5.3060@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:0XBwg.28479$cu1.704@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed
christain morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
BAM
translation: christians have no answer for the huge amount of horseshit
in the bible.
And you have no explanation for anything - the universe, the purpose of
your existence, what's good and evil, for example.
BAM
what's the matter, upset because I show your god to be a COLD-HEARTED
*****?
why do you worship a being that watches child porn?
purpose of my existence - to show people what a cold-hearted ***** the
christian and/or islamic god is.
good - satan
evil - the cold, hearted ***** christian god
Shall we compare body counts in the bible?
Let's see, the loving, caring christian god character drowned the whole
world, killed the firstborn of Egypt as well as its army after a
devastating series of plagues,
ordered and personally participated in the slaughter of countless
individuals during a genocidal rampage of his chosen people, fathered a
son specifically to be killed, and personally tortured a poor slob named
Job on a bet, and don't forget about demanding that Abraham MURDER his only
son.
The dreaded satan character did... Uhh... I don't know. I suppose he might
have killed someone at some point, but I'm not sure.
The satan character is a sweetheart compared to the evil monster character
called the christian god.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
23 Jul 2006 12:09:39 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:21:42 -0400, "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:4mCwg.3447$bP5.3060@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:0XBwg.28479$cu1.704@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed
christain morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
BAM
translation: christians have no answer for the huge amount of horseshit in
the bible.
And you have no explanation for anything - the universe,
We have some pretty good ideas about the start of the universe, none
of which require an appeal to magic, as the Christian explanation
does.
the purpose of your
existence,
You're making the assumption that there is one.
what's good and evil, for example.
"Good" and "evil" are both man-made concepts.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "nJb" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
23 Jul 2006 03:19:43 PM |
|
|
bam wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:4mCwg.3447$bP5.3060@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:0XBwg.28479$cu1.704@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed
christain morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
BAM
translation: christians have no answer for the huge amount of horseshit in
the bible.
And you have no explanation for anything - the universe, the purpose of your
existence, what's good and evil, for example.
BAM
So let's just make up a fairy tale.
Jack
.
|
|
|
| User: "torresD" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
23 Jul 2006 04:29:20 PM |
|
|
Jesus Christ=Emotionally Disturbed Person.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "colp" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
23 Jul 2006 06:17:36 AM |
|
|
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:0XBwg.28479$cu1.704@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed christain
morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
BAM
translation: christians have no answer for the huge amount of horseshit in
the bible.
From an unusual perspective it is not so much horseshit as evidence that
the truth has been intentionally hidden. The testimony of the adversary
can be more as compelling as that of the honest witness if you know how
to interpret it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
23 Jul 2006 07:30:11 AM |
|
|
"colp" <colp@solder.ath.cx> wrote in message
news:44c356f3@news.orcon.net.nz...
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:0XBwg.28479$cu1.704@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed
christain
morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
BAM
translation: christians have no answer for the huge amount of horseshit
in
the bible.
From an unusual perspective it is not so much horseshit as evidence that
the truth has been intentionally hidden. The testimony of the adversary
can be more as compelling as that of the honest witness if you know how
to interpret it.
actually, there's a lot of horseshit in the bible.
time for some BIBLE BABBLE.
Bible inconsistencies and pure myths.
1.. The Genesis 1 creation account conflicts with the order of events that
are known to science. In Genesis, the earth is created before light and
stars, birds and whales before reptiles and insects, and flowering plants
before any animals. The true order of events was just the opposite. 1:1-2:3
2.. God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from
night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects (the
sun and the stars) until the fourth day (1:14-19). And how could there be
"the evening and the morning" on the first day if there was no sun to mark
them? 1:3-5
3.. God spends one-sixth of his entire creative effort (the second day)
working on a solid firmament. This strange structure, which God calls
heaven, is intended to separate the higher waters from the lower waters.
1:6-8
4.. Plants are made on the third day before there was a sun to drive their
photosynthetic processes (1:14-19). 1:11
5.. God lets "the earth bring forth" the plants, rather than creating them
directly. Maybe Genesis is not so anti-evolution after all. 1:11
6.. In an apparent endorsement of astrology, God places the sun, moon, and
stars in the firmament so that they can be used "for signs". This, of
course, is exactly what astrologers do: read "the signs" in the Zodiac in an
effort to predict what will happen on Earth. 1:14
7.. God makes two lights: "the greater light [the sun] to rule the day,
and the lesser light [the moon] to rule the night." But the moon is not a
light, but only reflects light from the sun. And why, if God made the moon
to "rule the night", does it spend half of its time moving through the
daytime sky? 1:16
8.. "He made the stars also." God spends a day making light (before making
the stars) and separating light from darkness; then, at the end of a hard
day's work, and almost as an afterthought, he makes the trillions of stars.
1:16
9.. "And God set them [the stars] in the firmament of the heaven to give
light upon the earth." 1:17
10.. In verse 11, God "let the earth bring forth" the plants. Now he has
the earth "bring forth" the animals as well. So maybe the creationists have
it all wrong. Maybe God created livings things through the process of
evolution. 1:24
11.. God gave humans dominion over every other living thing on earth. 1:26
12.. God commands us to "be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the
earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over ... every living thing that
moveth upon the earth." 1:28
13.. All animals were originally herbivores. Tapeworms, vampire bats,
mosquitoes, and barracudas -- all were strict vegetarians, as they were
created by God. 1:30
14.. "God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good." He purposefully designed a system that ensures the suffering and
death of all his creatures, parasite and host, predator and prey. 1:31
15.. In Genesis 1 the entire creation takes 6 days, but the universe is at
least 12 billion years old, with new stars constantly being formed. 1:31
16.. Humans were not created instantaneously from dust and breath, but
evolved over millions of years from simpler life forms. 2:7
17.. After making the animals, God has Adam name them all. The naming of
several million species must have kept Adam busy for a while. But animals
were not created instantaneously from the ground, but evolved over millions
of years. And we still don't have names for all of them. Ten thousand new
species of insects are discovered and named each year. 2:18-22
18.. God curses the serpent. From now on the serpent will crawl on his
belly and eat dust. One wonders how he got around before -- by hopping on
his tail, perhaps? But snakes don't eat dust, do they? 3:14
19.. Because Adam listened to Eve, God cursed the ground and causes thorns
and thistles to grow. Before this, according to the (false) Genesis story,
plants had no natural defenses. The rose had no thorn, cacti were spineless,
holly leaves were smooth, and the nettle had no sting. Foxgloves, oleander,
and milkweeds were all perfectly safe to eat. 3:17-18
20.. "There were giants in the earth in those days." Well, I suppose it's
good to know that. But why is there no archaeological evidence for the
existence of these giants? 6:4
21.. Noah is told to make an ark that is 450 feet long. 6:14-15
22.. Whether by twos or by sevens, Noah takes male and female
representatives from each species of "every thing that creepeth upon the
earth." 7:8
23.. God opens the "windows of heaven." He does this every time it rains.
7:11
24.. All of the animals boarded the ark "in the selfsame day." 7:13-14
How do you get over 2,000,000 animals to board an arch in one day?
How do you feed all these animals for a year?
25.. The flood covered the highest mountain tops (Mount Everest?) with
fifteen cubits to spare. 7:20
26.. "The windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was
restrained." This happens whenever it stops raining. 8:2
27.. Noah sends a dove out to see if there was any dry land. But the dove
returns without finding any. Then, just seven days later, the dove goes out
again and returns with an olive leaf. But how could an olive tree survive
the flood? And if any seeds happened to survive, they certainly wouldn't
germinate and grow leaves within a seven day period. 8:8-11
28.. When the animals left the ark, what would they have eaten? There
would have been no plants after the ground had been submerged for nearly a
year. What would the carnivores have eaten? Whatever prey they ate would
have gone extinct. And how did the New World primates or the Australian
marsupials find there way back after the flood subsided? 8:19
29.. Noah kills the "clean beasts" and burns their dead bodies for God.
According to 7:8 this would have caused the extinction of all "clean"
animals since only two of each were taken onto the ark. 8:20-21
30.. "Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth." Although this
would have been good advice for the mythical Noah, it is deadly advice for
humankind as a whole. Overpopulation is one of our greatest problems, yet
there is nothing in the bible to address it. 9:1
31.. According to this verse, all animals fear humans. Although it is true
that many do, it is also true that some do not. Sharks and grizzly bears,
for example, are generally much less afraid of us than we are of them. 9:2
32.. "Into your hand are they (the animals) delivered." God gave the
animals to humans, and they can do whatever they please with them. This
verse has been used by bible believers to justify all kinds of cruelty to
anmials and environmental destruction. 9:2
33.. God is rightly filled with remorse for having killed his creatures.
He even puts the rainbow in the sky to remind himself of his promise to the
animals not to do it again. But rainbows are caused by the nature of light,
the refractive index of water, and the shape of raindrops. There were
rainbows billions of years before humans existed. 9:13
34.. Some creationists believe that this verse refers to continental
drift, which, they say, began to occur during the days of Pelag (which means
"division"), about 100 or so years after the flood. But many other
creationists disagree. 10:25
35.. "The whole earth was of one language." But this could not be true,
since by this time (around 2400 BCE) there were already many languages, each
unintelligible to the others. 11:1, 6
36.. God worries that people could actually build a tower high enough to
reach him (them?) in heaven. 11:4
37.. According to the Tower of Babel story, the many human languages were
created instantaneously by God. But actually the various languages evolved
gradually over long periods of time. 11:9
38.. The ridiculously long lives of the patriarchs. 11:10-32
39.. "And they returned to the land of the Philistines." But the
Philistines didn't arrive in the region of Canaan until around 1400 BCE --
600 years after Abraham's supposed migration from Ur. 21:32, 26:1, 21:32,
21:32, 8, 15, 18
.
|
|
|
| User: "colp" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
24 Jul 2006 01:32:37 AM |
|
|
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
"colp" <colp@solder.ath.cx> wrote in message
news:44c356f3@news.orcon.net.nz...
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:0XBwg.28479$cu1.704@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed
christain
morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
BAM
translation: christians have no answer for the huge amount of horseshit
in
the bible.
From an unusual perspective it is not so much horseshit as evidence that
the truth has been intentionally hidden. The testimony of the adversary
can be more as compelling as that of the honest witness if you know how
to interpret it.
actually, there's a lot of horseshit in the bible.
time for some BIBLE BABBLE.
Bible inconsistencies and pure myths.
1.. The Genesis 1 creation account conflicts with the order of events that
are known to science. In Genesis, the earth is created before light and
stars, birds and whales before reptiles and insects, and flowering plants
before any animals. The true order of events was just the opposite. 1:1-2:3
False. There is a gap of unknown duration between verse one and two.
2.. God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from
night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects (the
sun and the stars) until the fourth day (1:14-19).
False. The great lights were the lights from the physical sun and moon,
not the objects themselves.
And how could there be
"the evening and the morning" on the first day if there was no sun to mark
them? 1:3-5
Because solar days were already in existence, but the atmosphere had not
cleared to the extent that the sun was visible as a heavenly body.
3.. God spends one-sixth of his entire creative effort (the second day)
working on a solid firmament. This strange structure, which God calls
heaven, is intended to separate the higher waters from the lower waters.
1:6-8
So where's the problem with that?
4.. Plants are made on the third day before there was a sun to drive their
photosynthetic processes (1:14-19). 1:11
Plants can survive a day without light.
5.. God lets "the earth bring forth" the plants, rather than creating them
directly. Maybe Genesis is not so anti-evolution after all. 1:11
Still no problem.
6.. In an apparent endorsement of astrology, God places the sun, moon, and
stars in the firmament so that they can be used "for signs". This, of
course, is exactly what astrologers do: read "the signs" in the Zodiac in an
effort to predict what will happen on Earth. 1:14
So what?
7.. God makes two lights: "the greater light [the sun] to rule the day,
and the lesser light [the moon] to rule the night." But the moon is not a
light, but only reflects light from the sun. And why, if God made the moon
to "rule the night", does it spend half of its time moving through the
daytime sky? 1:16
Light is light regardless of whether it is reflected or not.
The moon is the brightest night-time body, hence it rules the night.
8.. "He made the stars also." God spends a day making light (before making
the stars) and separating light from darkness; then, at the end of a hard
day's work, and almost as an afterthought, he makes the trillions of stars.
1:16
The stars
9.. "And God set them [the stars] in the firmament of the heaven to give
light upon the earth." 1:17
Stars can be interpreted as being lights.
Let the stars of the twilight thereof be dark;
Job 3:9
10.. In verse 11, God "let the earth bring forth" the plants. Now he has
the earth "bring forth" the animals as well. So maybe the creationists have
it all wrong. Maybe God created livings things through the process of
evolution. 1:24
Nope, because the evenings and mornings measured out solar days.
11.. God gave humans dominion over every other living thing on earth. 1:26
No, humans did not have dominion over the tanynim (dragons/sea monsters)
12.. God commands us to "be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the
earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over ... every living thing that
moveth upon the earth." 1:28
O.K.
13.. All animals were originally herbivores. Tapeworms, vampire bats,
mosquitoes, and barracudas -- all were strict vegetarians, as they were
created by God. 1:30
Yep, that's what it says.
14.. "God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good." He purposefully designed a system that ensures the suffering and
death of all his creatures, parasite and host, predator and prey. 1:31
Where do you you get parasites and predators from in a vegetarian world?
15.. In Genesis 1 the entire creation takes 6 days, but the universe is at
least 12 billion years old, with new stars constantly being formed. 1:31
Yes, the Earth came to be an empty wasteland in verse two, before the
six day creation. Genesis does not say that the six day event happened
immediately after the planet was created in verse one.
16.. Humans were not created instantaneously from dust and breath, but
evolved over millions of years from simpler life forms. 2:7
No the didn't. One species cannot evolve into a species which which it
is unable to procreate successfully eg horse and donkey.
17.. After making the animals, God has Adam name them all. The naming of
several million species must have kept Adam busy for a while. But animals
were not created instantaneously from the ground, but evolved over millions
of years. And we still don't have names for all of them. Ten thousand new
species of insects are discovered and named each year. 2:18-22
Adam did not name all the creeping things.
18.. God curses the serpent. From now on the serpent will crawl on his
belly and eat dust. One wonders how he got around before -- by hopping on
his tail, perhaps? But snakes don't eat dust, do they? 3:14
Snakes have leg stubs. Aphar (dust) can also mean rubbish.
19.. Because Adam listened to Eve, God cursed the ground and causes thorns
and thistles to grow. Before this, according to the (false) Genesis story,
plants had no natural defenses. The rose had no thorn, cacti were spineless,
holly leaves were smooth, and the nettle had no sting. Foxgloves, oleander,
and milkweeds were all perfectly safe to eat. 3:17-18
You have not shown Genesis to be false. What is your point?
20.. "There were giants in the earth in those days." Well, I suppose it's
good to know that. But why is there no archaeological evidence for the
existence of these giants? 6:4
There is evidence of giants.
http://www.thesolomongiants.com/
21.. Noah is told to make an ark that is 450 feet long. 6:14-15
And?
22.. Whether by twos or by sevens, Noah takes male and female
representatives from each species of "every thing that creepeth upon the
earth." 7:8
And your point is?
23.. God opens the "windows of heaven." He does this every time it rains.
7:11
No, not every time it rains.
24.. All of the animals boarded the ark "in the selfsame day." 7:13-14
How do you get over 2,000,000 animals to board an arch in one day?
How do you feed all these animals for a year?
Where do you get the figure of 2 million animals from?
25.. The flood covered the highest mountain tops (Mount Everest?) with
fifteen cubits to spare. 7:20
Apparently, yes.
26.. "The windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was
restrained." This happens whenever it stops raining. 8:2
No, the flood was a one-off event.
27.. Noah sends a dove out to see if there was any dry land. But the dove
returns without finding any. Then, just seven days later, the dove goes out
again and returns with an olive leaf. But how could an olive tree survive
the flood? And if any seeds happened to survive, they certainly wouldn't
germinate and grow leaves within a seven day period. 8:8-11
Just because the dove didn't find anything the first time doesn't mean
that olive trees were not growing.
28.. When the animals left the ark, what would they have eaten? There
would have been no plants after the ground had been submerged for nearly a
year. What would the carnivores have eaten? Whatever prey they ate would
have gone extinct. And how did the New World primates or the Australian
marsupials find there way back after the flood subsided? 8:19
Ever heard of seeds germinating? Remember the vegitarian animals thqat
were mentioned previously?
29.. Noah kills the "clean beasts" and burns their dead bodies for God.
According to 7:8 this would have caused the extinction of all "clean"
animals since only two of each were taken onto the ark. 8:20-21
Noah probably took animals for his own use along with those that were
taken onboard according to the command.
30.. "Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth." Although this
would have been good advice for the mythical Noah, it is deadly advice for
humankind as a whole. Overpopulation is one of our greatest problems, yet
there is nothing in the bible to address it. 9:1
Actually there is, but the information is not readily apparent.
31.. According to this verse, all animals fear humans. Although it is true
that many do, it is also true that some do not. Sharks and grizzly bears,
for example, are generally much less afraid of us than we are of them. 9:2
Less afraid does not mean not afraid.
32.. "Into your hand are they (the animals) delivered." God gave the
animals to humans, and they can do whatever they please with them. This
verse has been used by bible believers to justify all kinds of cruelty to
anmials and environmental destruction. 9:2
Some people are just plain stupid.
33.. God is rightly filled with remorse for having killed his creatures.
He even puts the rainbow in the sky to remind himself of his promise to the
animals not to do it again. But rainbows are caused by the nature of light,
the refractive index of water, and the shape of raindrops. There were
rainbows billions of years before humans existed. 9:13
Says you.
34.. Some creationists believe that this verse refers to continental
drift, which, they say, began to occur during the days of Pelag (which means
"division"), about 100 or so years after the flood. But many other
creationists disagree. 10:25
And?
35.. "The whole earth was of one language." But this could not be true,
since by this time (around 2400 BCE) there were already many languages, each
unintelligible to the others. 11:1, 6
Evidence, please...
36.. God worries that people could actually build a tower high enough to
reach him (them?) in heaven. 11:4
What?
37.. According to the Tower of Babel story, the many human languages were
created instantaneously by God. But actually the various languages evolved
gradually over long periods of time. 11:9
Says you.
38.. The ridiculously long lives of the patriarchs. 11:10-32
The ridiculous assumptions of the ignorant...
39.. "And they returned to the land of the Philistines." But the
Philistines didn't arrive in the region of Canaan until around 1400 BCE --
600 years after Abraham's supposed migration from Ur. 21:32, 26:1, 21:32,
21:32, 8, 15, 18
Evidence, please...
.
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
24 Jul 2006 02:23:37 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:32:37 +1200, colp <colp@solder.ath.cx> wrote:
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
"colp" <colp@solder.ath.cx> wrote in message
news:44c356f3@news.orcon.net.nz...
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:0XBwg.28479$cu1.704@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed
christain
morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
BAM
translation: christians have no answer for the huge amount of horseshit
in
the bible.
From an unusual perspective it is not so much horseshit as evidence that
the truth has been intentionally hidden. The testimony of the adversary
can be more as compelling as that of the honest witness if you know how
to interpret it.
actually, there's a lot of horseshit in the bible.
time for some BIBLE BABBLE.
Bible inconsistencies and pure myths.
1.. The Genesis 1 creation account conflicts with the order of events that
are known to science. In Genesis, the earth is created before light and
stars, birds and whales before reptiles and insects, and flowering plants
before any animals. The true order of events was just the opposite. 1:1-2:3
False. There is a gap of unknown duration between verse one and two.
Which would have no effect on the fact that the order given for plants
and animals is wrong.
2.. God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from
night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects (the
sun and the stars) until the fourth day (1:14-19).
False. The great lights were the lights from the physical sun and moon,
Which, according to the story, were not yet created.
not the objects themselves.
Strange! What objects are you talking about?
And how could there be
"the evening and the morning" on the first day if there was no sun to mark
them? 1:3-5
Because solar days were already in existence, but the atmosphere had not
cleared to the extent that the sun was visible as a heavenly body.
The Sun that had not been created? How was that done?
3.. God spends one-sixth of his entire creative effort (the second day)
working on a solid firmament. This strange structure, which God calls
heaven, is intended to separate the higher waters from the lower waters.
1:6-8
So where's the problem with that?
It doesn't exist. What, by the way is "higher water"; is it supposed
to be in outer space?
4.. Plants are made on the third day before there was a sun to drive their
photosynthetic processes (1:14-19). 1:11
Plants can survive a day without light.
How did they begin to grow before that day?
5.. God lets "the earth bring forth" the plants, rather than creating them
directly. Maybe Genesis is not so anti-evolution after all. 1:11
Still no problem.
6.. In an apparent endorsement of astrology, God places the sun, moon, and
stars in the firmament so that they can be used "for signs". This, of
course, is exactly what astrologers do: read "the signs" in the Zodiac in an
effort to predict what will happen on Earth. 1:14
So what?
The point is that Astrology is nonsense.
snip of more of the same.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
| User: "colp" |
|
| Title: Genesis and gap theory |
24 Jul 2006 07:06:04 PM |
|
|
thomas p wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:32:37 +1200, colp <colp@solder.ath.cx> wrote:
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
"colp" <colp@solder.ath.cx> wrote in message
news:44c356f3@news.orcon.net.nz...
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:0XBwg.28479$cu1.704@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed
christain
morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
BAM
translation: christians have no answer for the huge amount of horseshit
in
the bible.
From an unusual perspective it is not so much horseshit as evidence that
the truth has been intentionally hidden. The testimony of the adversary
can be more as compelling as that of the honest witness if you know how
to interpret it.
actually, there's a lot of horseshit in the bible.
time for some BIBLE BABBLE.
Bible inconsistencies and pure myths.
1.. The Genesis 1 creation account conflicts with the order of events that
are known to science. In Genesis, the earth is created before light and
stars, birds and whales before reptiles and insects, and flowering plants
before any animals. The true order of events was just the opposite. 1:1-2:3
False. There is a gap of unknown duration between verse one and two.
Which would have no effect on the fact that the order given for plants
and animals is wrong.
Chapter one and two are not both accounts of the same events.
2.. God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from
night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects (the
sun and the stars) until the fourth day (1:14-19).
False. The great lights were the lights from the physical sun and moon,
Which, according to the story, were not yet created.
The story does not say that.
The sun was evident because of the existence of solar days implied by
the existence of evenings and mornings.
not the objects themselves.
Strange! What objects are you talking about?
The sun and the moon, which were created as parts of the heavens of
Genesis 1:1 and became apparent on Earth as heavenly lights on the
fourth day.
And how could there be
"the evening and the morning" on the first day if there was no sun to mark
them? 1:3-5
Because solar days were already in existence, but the atmosphere had not
cleared to the extent that the sun was visible as a heavenly body.
The Sun that had not been created? How was that done?
It was not the sun that was created on the fourth day, but a great
light, a light that was local to the Earth.
3.. God spends one-sixth of his entire creative effort (the second day)
working on a solid firmament. This strange structure, which God calls
heaven, is intended to separate the higher waters from the lower waters.
1:6-8
So where's the problem with that?
It doesn't exist.
Yes it does. The birds fly in it.
What, by the way is "higher water"; is it supposed
to be in outer space?
That would appear to be the case.
4.. Plants are made on the third day before there was a sun to drive their
photosynthetic processes (1:14-19). 1:11
Plants can survive a day without light.
How did they begin to grow before that day?
Who says that they were growing? Plants do not grow at night because of
the lack of light to support photosynthesis.
5.. God lets "the earth bring forth" the plants, rather than creating them
directly. Maybe Genesis is not so anti-evolution after all. 1:11
Still no problem.
6.. In an apparent endorsement of astrology, God places the sun, moon, and
stars in the firmament so that they can be used "for signs". This, of
course, is exactly what astrologers do: read "the signs" in the Zodiac in an
effort to predict what will happen on Earth. 1:14
So what?
The point is that Astrology is nonsense.
It's not my job to help you understand it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
22 Jul 2006 11:03:06 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 23:22:02 -0400, "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed christain
morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
That's one...
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
22 Jul 2006 10:36:17 PM |
|
|
bam wrote:
"SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote in message
news:v3ywg.3362$157.566@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Truth Hunter" <hunter1234222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153607425.315371.170740@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific?
This has been bothering me for a long time. If Jesus knew he was the
son of God, and that he would die and then rise from the grave, was
that really a sacrifice? I mean, if you come to me flat broke, and I
give you my last $10 and I don't know where my next meal is coming
from, that is a sacrifice. If I give you the same situation, except
that I know that the next day, my long lost uncle's will finishes
probate and I'm going to the lawyer's office and pick a check for a
million dollars, my gift may be a inconvience, but hardly a sacrifice.
Is it or isn't it?
of course it's not a sacrifice, it's a temporary inconvenience, that's
all.
I'm waiting to see what responses you will get from brainwashed christain
morons
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
More empty threats. What an amazing world you people live in. Gods,
monsters, demons hiding in the dark! Pathetic, wretched creatures you
are. Bam, every word out of your mouth just proves me correct about
abandoning your idiotic myth.
Feel free to say "yull fine owt ut JUDMENT DAYZ!" now, *****.
-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain
Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Jesus' Cruxifiction really a sacrific? |
23 Jul 2006 11:21:00 AM |
|
|
<panamfloyd@hotmail.com> wrote
How about that all you cretins are going to hell?
More empty threats. What an amazing world you people live in. Gods,
monsters, demons hiding in the dark! Pathetic, wretched creatures you
are. Bam, every word out of your mouth just proves me correct about
abandoning your idiotic myth.
Feel free to say "yull fine owt ut JUDMENT DAYZ!" now, *****.
Looks like you already know the score, infidel.
BAM
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|