| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Budikka" |
| Date: |
30 Oct 2004 04:27:29 PM |
| Object: |
Is the White House Stifles Global Warming Data? |
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/10/27/global.warming.ap/index.html:
We already know that Bush and his cronies are stiffing science
whenever it appears to conflict with their religious dogma. Now James
Hansen, a NASA scientist, has told a University of Iowa audience that
"[t]he Bush administration is trying to stifle scientific evidence of
the dangers of global warming in an effort to keep the public
uninformed."
Budikka
.
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the White House Stifles Global Warming Data? |
31 Oct 2004 07:16:21 AM |
|
|
On 30 Oct 2004 14:27:29 -0700, (Budikka) wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/10/27/global.warming.ap/index.html:
We already know that Bush and his cronies are stiffing science
whenever it appears to conflict with their religious dogma.
Where?
Now James
Hansen, a NASA scientist, has told a University of Iowa audience that
"[t]he Bush administration is trying to stifle scientific evidence of
the dangers of global warming in an effort to keep the public
uninformed."
For what reason?
Come on, bud, you're great at plagiarism so you can at least repeat why he believes that.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the White House Stifles Global Warming Data? |
02 Nov 2004 02:41:18 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<bap9o0hj4tbue0acui93d6iee62gq3ooku@4ax.com>...
Come on, bud, you're great at plagiarism so you
can at least repeat why he believes that.
How pathetically desperate you are to deflect attention from your
comprehensive impotence that you, a professing Christian, has to tell
pathetically transparent lies, where the only fact of this "case" is
your own perennial and chronic inability to grasp the implications and
import of what your opponents say.
Now if you can prove your case, go ahead and turn it in to each of
these three plagiarism reporting sites:
http://www.turnitin.com/static/home.html
http://www.mydropbox.com/
http://www.canexus.com/eve/
I challenge you to prove me a plagiarist. I, like you, must abide by
the majority decision of these three sites. If you duck this message
of fail in any other way to substantiate your case, you're admitting
to lying. It, like you, is that simple.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the White House Stifles Global Warming Data? |
01 Nov 2004 04:50:24 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<bap9o0hj4tbue0acui93d6iee62gq3ooku@4ax.com>...
On 30 Oct 2004 14:27:29 -0700, (Budikka) wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/10/27/global.warming.ap/index.html:
We already know that Bush and his cronies are stiffing science
whenever it appears to conflict with their religious dogma.
Where?
It's in the news groups with references, look it up.
Now James
Hansen, a NASA scientist, has told a University of Iowa audience that
"[t]he Bush administration is trying to stifle scientific evidence of
the dangers of global warming in an effort to keep the public
uninformed."
For what reason?
It's in the news groups with references, look it up.
Come on, bud, you're great at plagiarism
That's a lie. It's based on nothing more than your wilful
misunderstanding of something I said that you did not comprehend and
this has been explained to you many times. Now you need to either
support your accusation with proof or withdraw the lie. Let me offer
you a challenge. Here are three plagiarism reporting sites:
http://www.canexus.com/eve/
http://www.mydropbox.com/
http://www.turnitin.com/static/home.html
Submit your **EVIDENCE** to each of these three sites. I will abide
by the majority decision and you must too. Are you going to take up
the challenge? If your answer is no, you're admitting that you are a
liar. Get it now?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the White House Stifles Global Warming Data? |
01 Nov 2004 05:51:50 AM |
|
|
On 1 Nov 2004 02:50:24 -0800, (Budikka) wrote:
We already know that Bush and his cronies are stiffing science
whenever it appears to conflict with their religious dogma.
Where?
It's in the news groups with references, look it up.
Ok, so you don't know - nothing new.
Now James
Hansen, a NASA scientist, has told a University of Iowa audience that
"[t]he Bush administration is trying to stifle scientific evidence of
the dangers of global warming in an effort to keep the public
uninformed."
For what reason?
It's in the news groups with references, look it up.
Ok, so you don't know.
Come on, bud, you're great at plagiarism
That's a lie.
You are so weak in the bible you couldn't even submit an argument you at least believed.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the White House Stifles Global Warming Data? |
01 Nov 2004 03:53:31 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<cn8co09b0o4ut5oi2nm35in052fua3k56o@4ax.com>...
On 1 Nov 2004 02:50:24 -0800, (Budikka) wrote:
We already know that Bush and his cronies are stiffing science
whenever it appears to conflict with their religious dogma.
Where?
It's in the news groups with references, look it up.
Ok, so you don't know - nothing new.
You walked right into it blind as a bat, didn't you? No surprises
there.
So you see what I've demonstrated here? When I give **PRECISELY** the
same kind of reply to Puke that he routinely gives to others, he
doesn't like it. Perhaps he will learn from this in future and
actually give a supported response instead of this kind of reply?
Somehow I doubt it though since he's proven himself incapable of
supporting his assertions.
And to answer your question **AS OPPOSED TO RUNNING AWAY FROM IT* as
you routinely do: Bush Distorts Science"
http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0%2C1286%2C62339%2C00.html
Now can we take it, from this point on, as a fucking given that I can
support everything I say? Can we also take it that from this point on
that you **WILL** support what you say or shut-the-*****-up, *****?
Come on, bud, you're great at plagiarism
That's a lie.
You are so weak in the bible you couldn't even submit an
argument you at least believed.
The one who is weak in the Bible is the one who ran away from the
thread where I ran scriptural circles around him (with 14 questions he
dare not answer) like the cowardly piece of dogshit he is. Get it
now, Puke, you cowardly *****?
And to be complete, let's replace the piece of my previous message in
this thread that you snipped like the cowardly ***** you are so you
could run away from my exposing your lie about plagiarism:
That's a lie. It's based on nothing more than your wilful
misunderstanding of something I said that you did not comprehend and
this has been explained to you many times. Now you need to either
support your accusation with proof or withdraw the lie. Let me offer
you a challenge. Here are three plagiarism reporting sites:
http://www.canexus.com/eve/
http://www.mydropbox.com/
http://www.turnitin.com/static/home.html
Submit your **EVIDENCE** to each of these three sites. I will abide
by the majority decision and you must too. Are you going to take up
the challenge? If your answer is no, you're admitting that you are a
liar. Get it now?
I and the rest of the world can now comfortably accept that since you
snipped this, that you are admitting to lying on this subject.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka" |
|
| Title: Re: Is the White House Stifles Global Warming Data? |
02 Nov 2004 02:44:55 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<cn8co09b0o4ut5oi2nm35in052fua3k56o@4ax.com>...
Come on, bud, you're great at plagiarism
How pathetically desperate you are to deflect attention from your
comprehensive impotence that you, a professing Christian, has to tell
pathetically transparent lies, where the only fact of this "case" is
your own perennial and chronic inability to grasp the implications and
import of what your opponents say.
Now if you can prove your case, go ahead and turn it in to each of
these three plagiarism reporting sites:
http://www.turnitin.com/static/home.html
http://www.mydropbox.com/
http://www.canexus.com/eve/
I challenge you to prove me a plagiarist. I, like you, must abide by
the majority decision of these three sites. If you duck this message
of fail in any other way to substantiate your case, you're admitting
to lying. It, like you, is that simple.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
