| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
17 Dec 2006 06:55:26 PM |
| Object: |
Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53388
By Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson
Why are white Americans afraid to speak truth to black Americans?
Let me start with a tale of two Michaels:
Michael Richards, the "Seinfeld" co-star who lashed out at a black
heckler, repeatedly calling the man a "ni---r," has since made numerous
apologies to black Americans.
He apologized on David Letterman's "Late Show" - but that forum
wasn't "black enough" - so Richards was forced to grovel on Jesse
Jackson's radio show.
The black man Richards insulted has retained Gloria Allred. Next month,
he will express his contrition in front of a retired judge who will
determine how much money Richards should dole out for hurling the "N"
word.
Then there's the Nov. 25 shooting in New York City, where NYPD officers
shot Sean Bell, a 23-year-old black man outside a strip club in Queens
when he tried to ram an officer with his car. The incident has outraged
Rev. Al Sharpton ("the Riot King") and other black leaders.
Sharpton is threatening to lead a massive pre-Christmas march along
Manhattan's Fifth Avenue - stating, "We're going shopping for justice
this Christmas."
Let's not forget that Sharpton gave us the Tawana Brawley hoax and
provoked the Crown Heights riot in the Hasidic (Jewish) section of
Brooklyn.
Why should anyone listen to this hypocrite?
After the police shooting, Michael (the other Michael) Bloomberg, the
mayor of NYC, met with Sharpton and other black racist agitators and
prematurely criticized the deadly shooting, calling it "inexplicable"
and "unacceptable." Can you say "cave"?
What has happened to white men in this country?
White men used to be tough. John Wayne, Charlton Heston and Ronald
Reagan exemplified a strong male image. But because of the successful
attack - by secular progressives like NOW (National Organization of
Women who Hate Men), the ACLU, homosexual groups and liberal black
leaders - most white males have been emasculated.
Years of scapegoating and charges of racism have intimidated whites to
the point that they no longer speak out on issues concerning race and
morality.
After Dr. King's assassination in 1968, Jesse Jackson showed up in
front of the news cameras holding a bloody sweater. This is all it took
for him to be promoted by the elite media as the "heir apparent" to
King.
This despite Jackson's repeated falling out with Dr. King's
organization, the SCLC (Southern Christian Leadership Conference).
In 1971, Ralph Abernathy, King's successor at SCLC, suspended Jackson
for "administrative improprieties and repeated acts of violation of
organizational policy." Jackson then left the group and started
Operation PUSH.
The mainstream media keep wicked black leaders like Jackson in power.
Whenever there's a racial issue in this country Jackson or Sharpton are
on the airwaves to "blame whitey."
The media and false black leaders succeeded in changing the allegiance
of many black Americans - from a pro-family, pro-God people to a
government-dependant people as we witnessed during Katrina.
White people are angry at Jackson and the phony civil-rights leaders
who have made a living off of blaming them for the problems of blacks.
And they're angry about the double standard when it comes to racial
issues - and for not being allowed to openly express their
disagreements with blacks.
But they remain silent.
This has resulted in the phenomenon of white fear - fear of
criticizing blacks - no matter how corrupt, immoral or evil the
perpetrator.
Since whites are not allowed to express themselves, they either cower
down like Michael Bloomberg, or they lash out in anger like Michael
Richards. Then Jesse Jackson swoops in and points to the overreaction
as evidence of white racism - to exploit the situation for profit.
White Americans need to stand up for truth with strength and patience.
If we can find white people with courage, we can change this country
- and the tale of two Michaels would have a happy ending.
What is courage? Well, I can tell you what courage is not: 1) Courage
is not resenting blacks and complaining to your white friends behind
closed doors. 2) It's not tolerating black misconduct, and 3) Courage
is not adopting the divisive, politically correct term "African
American."
As for black Americans, they need to repudiate their "leaders" and let
go of past grievances, lest they self-destruct.
It will take decent whites and blacks to come together to live out the
promise of Dr. King's dream. Then, America will finally become the land
of the free and the home of the brave!
.
|
|
| User: "torresD" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
18 Dec 2006 02:44:29 PM |
|
|
Jimmy Carter.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16240761/site/newsweek/
The word apartheid-did you agonize about that?
Not really,
I didn't agonize because I knew
that's an accurate description of
what's going on in Palestine.
I would say that the plight
of the Palestinians now-the
confiscation of their land,
that they're being suppressed
completely against voicing their
disapproval of what's happening,
the building of the wall that
intrudes deep within their territory,
the complete separation of
Israelis from the Palestinians-all
of those things in many ways are
worse than some of the aspects
of apartheid in South Africa.
There is no doubt about it,
and no one can go there and
visit the different cities
in Palestine without agreeing
with what I have said.
Why do you think you're
under attack for the book
and the title?
You and I both know the
powerful influence of AIPAC
[the American Israel Public
Affairs Committee],
which is not designed to promote peace.
I'm not criticizing them,
they have a perfect right
to lobby,
but their purpose in life is
to protect and defend the policies
of the Israeli government and to
make sure those policies are
approved in the United States
and in our Congress-and they're
very effective at it.
I have known a large number
of Jewish organizations in
this country [that] have
expressed their approval
for the book and are
trying to promote peace.
But their voices are divided
and they're relatively reluctant
to speak out publicly.
And any member of Congress
who's looking to be re-elected
couldn't possibly say that they
would take a balanced position
between Israel and the Palestinians,
or that they would insist on Israel
withdrawing to international borders,
or that they would dedicate themselves
to protect human rights of Palestinians-it's
very likely that they would not be re-elected.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
18 Dec 2006 12:00:21 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
Joseph Welch wrote:
"Sam Brown" <xxx@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:lomhh.26263$6F1.11336@fe11.news.easynews.com...
Consorts with communist tyrants and kow tows to them.
http://blogs.
http: carter = commie.
Why do you hate America?
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Manitoba 1 (December 16)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 22 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
18 Dec 2006 12:18:39 PM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
Joseph Welch wrote:
"Sam Brown" <xxx@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:lomhh.26263$6F1.11336@fe11.news.easynews.com...
Consorts with communist tyrants and kow tows to them.
http://blogs.
http: carter = commie.
Why do you hate America?
Carter = America?
Why do you trim groups from the followups loser?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
18 Dec 2006 01:30:56 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
Joseph Welch wrote:
"Sam Brown" <xxx@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:lomhh.26263$6F1.11336@fe11.news.easynews.com...
Consorts with communist tyrants and kow tows to them.
http://blogs.
http: carter = commie.
Why do you hate America?
Carter = America?
No. I'm asking for documented proof from mainstream media to support your
opinion.
Why do you trim groups from the followups loser?
I've already explained it to you, Alzheimers Boy. Have your caretaker explain
how to backtrack through the thread.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Manitoba 1 (December 16)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 22 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 08:13:07 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
torresD wrote:
Jimmy Carter.
Consorts with communist tyrants and kow tows to them.
....in your less than rational opinion, of course.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Manitoba 1 (December 16)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 22 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 08:41:53 PM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
torresD wrote:
Jimmy Carter.
Consorts with communist tyrants and kow tows to them.
...in your less than rational opinion,
In truth and practice:
http://www.jfednepa.org/mark%20silverberg/jimmycarter.html
The decision of the Norwegian Nobel Committee to award former President
Jimmy Carter the Nobel Peace Prize for 2002 requires some serious
review. The Committee stated that it was honoring the former president
"for his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to
international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to
promote economic and social development." But history tells a different
story - that of a political neophyte president who, when it came to
conducting domestic and foreign affairs, was way out of his depth.
According to Michael Schoenfeld of Commentary, who reviewed Carter's
book Living Faith, "to this day he (Carter) still doesn't know how much
he doesn't know." In his four short years in office, things went from
bad to worse to terrible. Inflation doubled; short-term interest rates
hit a high of 21%. But the soaring misery index was the least, however,
of what went wrong. From Lancegate to Billygate, the tone of the
presidency fell to depths unheard of since the Harding administration.
His record as President illustrates the folly of pursuing a policy of
understanding in a world replete with dictators and despots. He lectured
Americans on the foolishness of their "fear of communism"............
and the Soviets responded by invading Afghanistan. He tried to appease
the mullahs in Iran, and they responded by holding dozens of Americans
hostage, releasing them the moment Ronald Reagan was inaugurated.
In his book, Carter proudly recalls how he formulated policy by sitting
in the Oval Office studying "a big globe," endeavoring to see the world
"through Soviet eyes". There, across the ocean, was the "beleaguered"
Leonid Brezhnev, trapped "in a closed society, surrounded by frozen
seas, powerfully armed enemies, and doubtful allies." A primary Carter
consideration when negotiating with the Soviet dictator was trying (as
he puts it) "to alleviate (Brezhnev's) concerns." Saddam Hussein and
every other tyrant of the 20th century would have been thrilled had a
U.S. President shown such an "understanding."
In one session, where Carter questioned the Soviets' record on human
rights, Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko turned the tables and
delivered a lecture on the Soviet Union's free medical care, zero
unemployment and absence of homelessness. "I couldn't argue," Mr. Carter
admits. "We each had a definition of human rights and differences like
this must be recognized and understood." Really? Ever read The Gulag
Archipelago?
Carter was fully aware that human-rights abuses were more prevalent in
the Soviet bloc than in authoritarian third-world countries. But he
avoided criticism of Communist abuses because he was afraid of offending
the Kremlin. As he wrote in his personal diary: "It's important that he
[Brezhnev] understand the commitment I have is to human rights.......and
that it is not an antagonistic attitude of mine toward the Soviet
Union." What Carter failed to see - and perhaps still has not recognized
- is that it was the very nature of the Soviet dictatorship that was the
problem. If America is committed to human rights, then its policies
should reflect antagonism towards those dictatorships that abuse them to
remain in power.
Carter's reputation was that of melting in the presence of Communist
dictators. As the "human rights president," Carter noted that
Yugoslavia's Marshall Tito was "a man who believed in human rights."
Carter saluted the dictator as "a great and courageous leader" who had
led his people and protected their freedom." He reserved similar remarks
for Romania's (now deposed Communist) dictator Nicholai Ceaucescu.
In December 1977, Polish Communist boss Edward Giereck was ushered into
the Oval Office. According to the White House transcript of the meeting,
he told Gierek, "Our concept of human rights is preserved (ie: safe) in
Poland. Carter actually "expressed appreciation for Poland's support for
the Helsinki Agreement and its commitment to human rights." He offered
no criticism of the Polish Communist government's human-rights record -
despite the fact that, one month earlier, the Polish secret police had
attacked thousands of workers protesting food price increases. Four
people were killed in the melee; hundreds of others were arrested and
savagely beaten in prison.
It gets worse. As Jay Nordlinger notes in the National Review Online
(October, 2002), "Carter has long enjoyed a reputation as a Middle East
sage, owing, of course, to his role in the original Camp David accords.
That reputation, however, rests on shaky grounds." Nordlinger points out
that Sadat and Begin had their deal worked out before ever approaching
Washington. Why did they contact the White House? Prof. Bernard Lewis of
Princeton University put it succinctly: “Well, obviously, they needed
someone to pay the bill, and who but the United States could fulfill
that function?”
No one quite realizes just how passionately anti-Israel Carter was.
William Safire has reported that Cyrus Vance acknowledged that, if
Carter had had a second term, he would have "sold Israel down the
river." In fact, in The Unfinished Presidency, Douglas Brinkley,
Carter's biographer and analyst writes, “There was no world leader Jimmy
Carter was more eager to know than Yassir Arafat.” The former president
“felt certain affinities with the Palestinian: a tendency toward
hyperactivity and a workaholic disposition with unremitting sixteen-hour
days, seven days a week, decade after decade.” The brutality, the
corruption and the human rights abuses to which Arafat and his PLO
subjected the Palestinian people were, at best peripheral, and at worst,
the fault of the Israelis.
At their first meeting - in 1990 - Carter boasted of his toughness
toward Israel, assuring Arafat at one point, “. . . you should not be
concerned that I am biased. I am much more harsh with the Israelis.”
Arafat, for his part, railed against the Reagan administration. Rosalynn
Carter, taking notes for her husband, interjected, “You don’t have to
convince us!” Brinkley records that this “elicited gales of laughter all
round.” Carter himself, according to Brinkley, “agreed that the Reagan
administration was not renowned as promise keepers." Interesting
comment, especially to Yassir Arafat.
According to Peter Schweizer in the October issue of the National
Review, there is also irony in the Nobel Committee's championing Carter
for his commitment to democratic principles. While the ex-president has
laudably worked for free and open elections in the developing world, he
has also sought foreign influence in American elections to defeat his
political enemies.
On repeated occasions during his Presidency, according to numerous
Soviet accounts, Carter encouraged Moscow to influence American politics
for his benefit or for the detriment of his enemies. Soviet Ambassador
Anatoly Dobrynin recounts in his memoirs how, in the waning days of the
1980 campaign, the Carter White House dispatched Armand Hammer to the
Soviet embassy. Explaining to the Soviet Ambassador that Carter was
"clearly alarmed" at the prospect of losing to Reagan, Hammer asked for
help: Could the Kremlin expand Jewish emigration to bolster Carter's
standing in the polls? "Carter won't forget that service if he is
elected," Hammer told Dobrynin.
According to Georgii Kornienko, first deputy foreign minister at the
time, something similar took place in 1976, when Carter sent Averell
Harriman to Moscow. Harriman sought to assure the Soviets that Carter
would be "easier to deal with" than Ford, clearly inviting Moscow to do
what it could through public diplomacy to help his campaign.
Even when he was out of office, Carter still tried bitterly to encourage
Moscow to do damage to his enemies during an election. As Dobrynin
recounts, in January 1984, the former president dropped by his residence
for a private meeting. Carter was concerned about Reagan's defense
build-up and went on to explain that Moscow would be better off with
someone else in the White House. If Reagan won, he warned, "There would
not be a single agreement on arms control, especially on nuclear arms,
as long as Reagan remained in power."
Is it any wonder that this man's presidency ended in a spectacular
foreign policy fiasco?
Which brings us to Carter's life after his Presidency.
Jonah Goldberg, in his May, 2002 article in the National Review, notes
that while the first President Bush was trying to orchestrate an
international coalition to remove Saddam Hussein from Kuwait, Carter
wrote a letter to the U.N. Security Council - including Mitterrand’s
France and Communist China - asking its members to stymie Bush's efforts.
He told Haitian dictator Lt. Gen. Raoul Cedras, he was "ashamed of what
my country has done to your country." Carter himself has conducted talks
with men like Syria's Hafez al-Assad, and North Korea's Kim II Sung both
of whom, he writes, "have at times been misunderstood, ridiculed, and
totally condemned by the American public." Part of the reason is "their
names are foreign, not Anglo-Saxon," he observes.
He endorsed Yasser Arafat's sham election and grumbled about the
legitimate vote that ousted Sandinista Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua.
Unbelievably, Carter even volunteered to be Arafat's speechwriter and
go-fer, crafting palatable messages for Arafat's Western audiences and
convincing the Saudis to continue funding Arafat after the Palestinians
sided with Iraq against the United States.
Bet you haven't read that anywhere.
As we see from Living Faith, Carter has consistently conducted a
sustained public-relations campaign to repair his tattered reputation.
One component has entailed the public performance of true charitable
works through Habitat for Humanity - reporters and TV cameras in tow -
building homes for the poor and the oppressed, in the American barrios
and also in communist Nicaragua, with Sandinista leaders by his side.
A more significant part of his PR campaign has revolved around the
Carter Center, set up to promote international understanding. Arabs are
heavy-duty funders of the Carter Center, and they get a lot for their
money. The philosophy of the Center, according to Carter himself is to
"encourage the use of dialogue to resolve disputes - which runs against
the American grain......We tend to see conflicts in terms of
friend-enemy, angel-devil, and this is one of the major impediments to
world peace."
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 09:49:57 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
torresD wrote:
Jimmy Carter.
Consorts with communist tyrants and kow tows to them.
...in your less than rational opinion,
In truth and practice:
http://www.jfednepa.org/mark%20silverberg/jimmycarter.html
Repetition doesn't equal proof, "Sam".
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Manitoba 1 (December 16)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 22 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 10:07:12 PM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
torresD wrote:
Jimmy Carter.
Consorts with communist tyrants and kow tows to them.
...in your less than rational opinion,
In truth and practice:
http://www.jfednepa.org/mark%20silverberg/jimmycarter.html
Repetition doesn't equal proof, "Sam".
Snipping groups from the followups and deleting text doesn't make you
appear anything but the lying censor.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 11:17:29 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
torresD wrote:
Jimmy Carter.
Consorts with communist tyrants and kow tows to them.
...in your less than rational opinion,
In truth and practice:
http://www.jfednepa.org/mark%20silverberg/jimmycarter.html
Repetition doesn't equal proof, "Sam".
Snipping groups from the followups and deleting text doesn't make you appear
anything but the lying censor.
Too bad that I came to Usenet a few years before you did - when newsgroups had
a purpose for their names. (Meanwhile, since I obviously don't live in Oregon
*or* the Seattle area, I don't read those newsgroup hierarchies. Too bad you
can't show the same consideration to the audience of the newsgroups you
abuse.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Manitoba 1 (December 16)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 22 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 08:51:52 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
torresD wrote:
Jimmy Carter.
Consorts with communist tyrants and kow tows to them.
...in your less than rational opinion, at least.
In truth and practice:
http://www.jfednepa.org/mark%20silverberg/jimmycarter.html
....which is one cranky crackpot in a wide spot in the road in Pennsylvania.
Assertion != proof. Impress that on your "intellect" before you continue to
strafe your feet.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Manitoba 1 (December 16)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 22 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 09:06:39 PM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
< snipped the reply groups list as all cowards do>
If you want to respond to and engage in multi-group threads have the
basic intellectual honesty not to trim it back to one group in a blatant
play to restrict access to your predictable humiliation!
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
torresD wrote:
Jimmy Carter.
Consorts with communist tyrants and kow tows to them.
...in your less than rational opinion, at least.
In truth and practice:
http://www.jfednepa.org/mark%20silverberg/jimmycarter.html
...which is one cranky crackpot
Oh my, the cut and deny tactic, how mordantly predictable...
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53379
No other prominent American has so often pursued appeasement and kinder
treatment of the agents of evil: the communist Soviet bloc, the
crack-pot communist regime in North Korea, the murderous communist
regime in Cuba, Islamic radicals in Iran, Palestinian suicide sponsors,
Islamic terrorist groups in the Middle East and Hugo Chavez's Marxist
regime in Venezuela to name a few.
Not once has Carter's "be kind to the murderous forces of tyranny"
approach brought about peace or harmony for the world's people. Instead
he has undermined the standing of free nations in their efforts to
spread the light of freedom and democracy throughout the world.
As WorldNetDaily reported last year, Carter embraced one of Saddam
Hussein's Iraqi intelligence agents involved in the United Nation's
oil-for-food scam, prior to the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Jimmy Carter has long been dogged by charges of an anti-Israel bias, but
now the former peanut brain, excuse me, peanut farmer has decided he
doesn't care if everyone knows his true antipathy toward the Israeli people.
In Carter's new book, "Palestine: Peace not Apartheid," he compares the
Israeli government to the internationally condemned system of apartheid
in South Africa. In doing so, Carter makes it clear that when it comes
to the democratically elected government in Jerusalem versus the forces
of Islamic terrorism, he is sympathetic to the side of the terrorists.
Since leaving office, Carter has repeatedly spoken out against the
peaceful people of Israel and instead befriended the PLO terrorist
leader Yasser Arafat, while working to pressure Israel to give more land
away to the terrorists.
During the elections in the Palestinian territories, Jimmy Carter went
so far as to travel to the region to validate the election of the
terrorist group Hamas to head the government there. He went on to beg
the international community to give millions of dollars in cash to
Hamas, providing hollow assurances to the world that any money received
wouldn't be used to fund the group's paramilitary and terrorist programs.
We've gotten such bogus promises before from Jimmy Carter when he
promised us his special deal with the North Korean communist regime
would mean a nuclear-free North Korea.
History proved it's best not to trust the promises of Jimmy Carter and
his despot friends.
Earlier this year, I launched the Censure Carter campaign to hold Jimmy
Carter accountable for his inexcusable conduct. We kicked off the effort
in my column right here at WorldNetDaily.
Within days I was contacted by scores of people from Venezuela. These
people were desperate to secure freedom and democracy for their nation,
having lived under Marxist dictator Hugo Chavez's iron fist of fear.
They believed that Chavez had come to power in an illegitimate election,
sanctioned by Jimmy Carter, and they wanted the world to know the truth.
Carter's response to these allegations has been the same "aww shucks, I
can't be bothered with that" attitude that he has used every other time
he has been criticized and caught for propping up authoritarian regimes.
Carter seems convinced that America is an "evil empire" and not the
"shining city on a hill" that Ronald Reagan saw.
His allies in the political left and in the news media glorify Jimmy
Carter's appeasement of terrorists and dictators. Jon Stewart had Carter
come on "The Daily Show" so Stewart could absolve Carter of all his sins
and heap endless praise on the former president.
Such foolishness trivializes the fact that millions of people now live
under tyranny and untold thousands have died because of Carter's efforts
since having left office. That's on top of those who suffered from his
actions while in office.
Some people might be uncomfortable calling a former president of the
United States "human scum," but when you consider how many people have
lost their lives as Carter has sided with the forces of evil time and
again, is there any other name that more appropriately describes this
disgraced man?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 09:28:23 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
< snipped the reply groups list as all cowards do>
The nerve of me, showing consideration for readers of the other groups you
abuse.
If you want to respond to and engage in multi-group threads have the basic
intellectual honesty not to trim it back to one group in a blatant play to
restrict access to your predictable humiliation!
I'd appreciate it if you'd cut way back on the hallucinogens, child. (Free
clue: I don't read or.politics, for reasons so obvious even you might
understand them.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Manitoba 1 (December 16)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 22 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 09:39:32 PM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
< snipped the reply groups list as all cowards do>
The nerve of me, showing consideration for readers of the other groups you
abuse.
The nerve of you only doing so when it suits your purpose, which
coincides neatly with when you're being humiliated in debate!
If you want to respond to and engage in multi-group threads have the basic
intellectual honesty not to trim it back to one group in a blatant play to
restrict access to your predictable humiliation!
I'd appreciate it if you'd cut way back on the hallucinogens, child.
I'd appreciate it if you stopped lying.
(Free
clue: I don't read or.politics, for reasons so obvious even you might
understand them.)
Then trim it from ALL your replies, not just the ones I smack you in!
Fucking phony creep.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 10:40:31 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
< snipped the reply groups list as all cowards do>
The nerve of me, showing consideration for readers of the other groups you
abuse.
The nerve of you only doing so when it suits your purpose, which coincides
neatly with when you're being humiliated in debate!
Enjoy your delusions of omniscience.
If you want to respond to and engage in multi-group threads have the basic
intellectual honesty not to trim it back to one group in a blatant play to
restrict access to your predictable humiliation!
I'd appreciate it if you'd cut way back on the hallucinogens, child.
I'd appreciate it if you stopped lying.
I'm offering my opinion. You'd be free to ignore it, if you weren't so
infatuated with your own bloated ego.
(Free clue: I don't read or.politics, for reasons so obvious even you
might understand them.)
Then trim it from ALL your replies, not just the ones I smack you in!
Sorry, but I don't obey you.
Fucking phony creep.
*yawn* Get back to me after reality has high-sticked you a few more times.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Manitoba 1 (December 16)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 22 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 10:49:11 PM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
<groups list rebuilt to expose the intellectual coward to the full
measure of his mendacity>
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
< snipped the reply groups list as all cowards do>
The nerve of me, showing consideration for readers of the other groups you
abuse.
The nerve of you only doing so when it suits your purpose, which coincides
neatly with when you're being humiliated in debate!
Enjoy your delusions of omniscience.
I enjoy rendering you an impotent lying smacktoy.
If you want to respond to and engage in multi-group threads have the basic
intellectual honesty not to trim it back to one group in a blatant play to
restrict access to your predictable humiliation!
I'd appreciate it if you'd cut way back on the hallucinogens, child.
I'd appreciate it if you stopped lying.
I'm offering my opinion.
Which is only based on lies.
You'd be free to ignore it, if you weren't so
infatuated with your own bloated ego.
I've gotten under your skin, as was the plan...
(Free clue: I don't read or.politics, for reasons so obvious even you
might understand them.)
Then trim it from ALL your replies, not just the ones I smack you in!
Sorry, but I don't obey you.
No, you merely function as my virtual punching bag, albeit with
increasingly less rebound.
Fucking phony creep.
*yawn* Get back to me after reality has high-sticked you a few more times.
Oh...a sports metaphor...how droll...
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 11:33:19 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
<groups list rebuilt to expose the intellectual coward to the full measure of
his mendacity>
Oops! Keep raping that strawman, Brownback!
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
The Chief Instigator wrote:
< snipped the reply groups list as all cowards do>
The nerve of me, showing consideration for readers of the other groups you
abuse.
The nerve of you only doing so when it suits your purpose, which coincides
neatly with when you're being humiliated in debate!
Enjoy your delusions of omniscience.
I enjoy rendering you an impotent lying smacktoy.
You're far too easily amused.
If you want to respond to and engage in multi-group threads have the
basic intellectual honesty not to trim it back to one group in a blatant
play to restrict access to your predictable humiliation!
I'd appreciate it if you'd cut way back on the hallucinogens, child.
I'd appreciate it if you stopped lying.
I'm offering my opinion.
Which is only based on lies.
So where's your proof? (No, it's not a number somewhere around 102.)
You'd be free to ignore it, if you weren't so
infatuated with your own bloated ego.
I've gotten under your skin, as was the plan...
Thanks for your admission that you're not interested in actual debate.
(Free clue: I don't read or.politics, for reasons so obvious even you
might understand them.)
Then trim it from ALL your replies, not just the ones I smack you in!
Sorry, but I don't obey you.
No, you merely function as my virtual punching bag, albeit with increasingly
less rebound.
At least the time you spend ranting at me and patting yourself on the back
can't be spent causing trouble for real people in real life.
Fucking phony creep.
*yawn* Get back to me after reality has high-sticked you a few more times.
Oh...a sports metaphor...how droll...
Watch a hockey game or two, and even you might grasp why I'm using that
expression.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Manitoba 1 (December 16)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 22 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Scratch" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 07:47:40 PM |
|
|
torresD wrote:
Jimmy Carter.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Traitor!
--
http://www.highvolumemedia.com/thebullhorn/WarOnTerror/ClintonsFailures/
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Is there 1 white man who has any courage? |
17 Dec 2006 08:15:16 PM |
|
|
"Larry (Scratch)" <Scratch@Tigard.OR.com> writes:
torresD wrote:
Jimmy Carter.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Traitor!
Prove *that* to the standards of a court of law, Washington County Crackhead.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 3, Manitoba 1 (December 16)
NEXT GAME: Friday, December 22 vs. Chicago, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
