| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Bill M" |
| Date: |
04 Oct 2006 09:08:45 AM |
| Object: |
IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
There are dozens of major religions and hundreds of variations of beliefs
within theses religions. There are thousands of additional different god
beliefs. The top dozen are;
Hinduism, Judaism, Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, Shinto, Confucianism, Jainism,
Taoism, Christianity, Islam, Sikhism, and Bahá'í
There is NO objective verifiable evidence as to the actual existence of any
of these gods. All of the beliefs are founded on the claims and opinions of
other men.
Why do people base their lives on such nebulous information? Of the
thousands of god beliefs, which if any, is the real god and why does this
god not clearly demonstrate he is the real god and which are fakes? Why
would any real god permit his creations to be so mislead and confused? The
evidence is that non of these are real gods but merely the 'creations' of
man!
List of the many gods believed in by man;
Ahura Mazda, Allah, Aphrodite, Ares, Athena, Apollo, Artemis, Babaluaye,
Bacchus,
Baldur, Bast, Bellona, Brahma, Brigid, Ceres, Cupid, Cerridwen,
Demeter, Diana, Dione, Dionysus, Eris, Eos, Eleggua, , El Shaddai, Elohim
Eshu, Ereshkigal,
Frigga, Frey, Freya, Gaea, Lord Genesa, Hades, Hebe, Hera, Helios, Hel,
Hephaestus,
Hermes, Hestia, Horus, Ibeji, Ifa, Inanna, Indra, Ishana, Ishtar,
Isis, Janus, Juno, Jehovah, Jove, Jupiter, Kali. Krishna Kronos, Korravai,
Loki, Lugh, Lord Indra, Manitou, Mars, Mercury, Minerva, Mercurius,
Morrigan,
Nahuiquiahuitl, Nanahuatzin, Nephthys, Neptune, Obatala, Odin, Ogun,
Oshosi, Oshun, Osiris, Oya, Orunmila, Olokun, Olodumare, Pluto,
Persephone, Poseidon, Proserpina, Quetzalcoatl, Ra, Lord Rama, Rhea, Saturn,
Set,
Selene, Shango, Lord Siva, Tammuz, Thor, Tir, Tiw, Uranus, Venus, Vesta,
Vishnu,
Vesta, Vulcan, Wotan, Yahweh, Yemaya, Zeus, XodA.
African gods:
Abassi [Sky]
Abonsam [Evil]
Abora [Supreme]
Abzu [Water]
Acoran [Supreme]
Adaheli [Sun]
Adro [Sky]
Adroa [Sky]
Agassou [Panther]
Agbe-Naete [Water]
Age [Animals]
Aigamuxa [Monster]
Ajalamo[Unborn Children]
Aje [Wealth]
Ajok [Supreme]
Akonadi [Oracle]
Akongo [Supreme]
Akuj [Supreme]
Ala [Earth/Fertility]
Alatangana [Creator]
Amma [Creator]
Anansi [Trickster]
Anyiewo [Snake]
Aondo [Creator]
Apa [Creator]
Apedemak [War]
Arawa [Moon]
Arebati [Sky]
Arom [Contracts]
Arsan Duolai [Underworld]
Asase Ya [Earth]
Ashiakle [Wealth]
Asis [Sun]
Astar [Sky]
Ataa Naa
Nyongmo
[Creator]
Ataokoloinona [Supreme]
Atete [Fertility]
Avrikiti [Fishermen]
Ayabba
[Ayaba] [Hearth]
Bacax [Cave]
Bagba [Wind]
Balubaal [Earth+]
Bandara [Superior Gods]
Banga [Clear water]
Behanzin [Fish]
Beher [Sea]
Bera Pennu [Vegetation]
Bo [Warriors]
Bomazi[Ancestors]
Buadza [WInd]
Buck[River]
Buku [Sky]
Bumba [Creator]
Cagn [Creator]
(!Kaggen)
Cghene [Creator]
Chiuke
(Chuku) [Creator]
Chiata [Supreme]
Chwezi [Hero]
Col [Rain]
Chikara [Sky]
Danh
(Dan Ayido Hwedo) [Snake]
Deng [Sky]
Deohako [Beans+]
Dii Mauri [Moorish Gods]
Dongo [Outer Space]
Dugbo [Earth]
Dxui [Creator]
Emeli-hi [Supreme]
Eranoranhan [Protector]
Eshu (Elegba) [Trickster]
Fa [Destiny]
Famien [Fertility]
Faro [Sky/Water]
Fidi Mukullu [Creator]
Garang and Abuk [First Humans]
Gbeni [Chief]
Gei (Gou) [Moon]
Gu [War/Smiths]
Gua [Sky]
Gulu [Supreme]
Gunab [Evil]
Guruhi [Evil]
Gurzil [Bull]
Gwalu [Rain]
Hammon [Setting Sun]
Harun and Haruna [Water Spirits]
Heitsi-Eibib [Sorcerer]
Hevioss [Thunder]
Huntin [Tree]
Huvean [Creator]
Ifa [Oracul]
Ikenga [Supreme]
Imana [Creator]
Iruwa [Sun]
Juok [Creator]
Kalumba [Creator]
Kalunga Supreme]
Katavi [Demonic]
Ka Tyeleo [Supreme]
Khebieso [Lightening]
Kho-dumo-dumo [Demon]
Kholomodumo [Monster]
Khuzwane [Creator]
Kibuka [War]
Kokola [Guardian]
Kwammang-a [Supreme]
Kwoth [Spirit]
Kyala [Creator]
Legba [Trickster]
Leza [Chief]
Libanza [Supreme]
Lisa [Chameleon]
Lyangombe[Chief]
Macardit [Demon]
Mantis [Creator]
Massim-Biambe [Creator]
Mawu [Sky]
Mawu-Lisa [Supreme Couple]
Mbotumbo [Supreme]
Medr [Earth]
Moomb [Creator]
Mon [?]
Mugasa
Mugu [Sky]
Mujaji [Rain]
Mukasa [Supreme]
Mula Djadi [Creator]
Muluku [Supreme]
Mulungu
Mungu [Creator]
Mungo (Mungu) [?]
Musa (Teaching]
Musisi [Supreme]
Mwari [Supreme]
Nampa [Personal]
Nana-Bouclou [First Gods]
Nana Buluk [Creator]
Ndjambi [Sky]
Ndriananahary [Supreme]
Nduru [Jungle]
Nenaunir [Storm]
Nesshoue [River]
Ngai ('Ngai) [Creator]
Ngewo-wa [Creator]
Ngworekara [Demon]
Niamye [Supreme]
Nkosi Yama'kosi [Supreme]
Nommo [Elemental]
Nommo [Spirit]
Nyama [Animal]
Nyambe [Supreme]
Nyambi (Nyambe) [Supreme]
Nyame
Nyami-Nyami [Guardian]
Nyankopon (Ashanti:Nyame) [Supreme]
Nyamia Ama [Supreme]
Nyasaye [Supeme]
Nzambi (Nzambi)
Mpunguo) [Supreme]
Nzame [Supreme]
Obassi Osaw [Supreme]
Obatala [Sky]
Oduduwa (Odudua) [Earth]
Ogun (Ogoun) War]
Olokula [Sea]
Olorun [Supreme]
Omumbo-Rombonga [Tree of Life]
Orahan [Supreme]
Orisa Nla [Creator]
Orishako [Agriculture]
Orunjan [Midday Sun]
Orunmila [Compassion]
Oshalla [?]
Osun [Beauty and Love]
Oya [Passion and Power]
Pemba (Bemba) Mother]
Qandisa [Demon]
Qamata[Quamta] Supreme]
Rock-Sene [Supreme]
Ruwa [Supreme]
Sagbata [Smallpox]
Sakarabru [Medicine]
Sakpata [Smallpox]
Sango [Thunder]
Shango [Thunder]
So [Lightening]
Tano [River]
Tore [Forest]
Trowu[Spirits]
Tsui'goab [Rain]
Twe [Lake]
Umvelinqangi [Creator]
Unkulunkulu [Supreme]
Unumbotte [Creator]
Waka [Rain]
Wele [Supreme]
Wulbari [Supreme]
Wuni [Supreme]
Xewioso [Thunder]
Yemaja [Creation]
Yo [Impersonal]
Zin [Water]
Table of Asian Gods:
BUDDHIST
Abhijnaraja [Physician]
Abhimukhi [One of the Bhumis]
Acala [?]
Adhimukticarya [One of the Bhumis]
Adhimuktivasita [One of the Bhumis]
Adibuddha [First]
Adidharma [Primeval]
Aizen Myo-o [Protective]
Ajaya [?]
Akasagarbha(Tibetan Nam-mkhai
Aksayajnana-Karmanda [Literature]
Aksobhya (Japanese Ashuku, Chinese A-Chu'u) [One of the Dhyani]
Amida [Savior]
Amitabha [A Dhyani]
Amitayus [Longevity]
Amoghapasa [see Avalokitesvara]
Amoghasiddhi [A Dhyani]
Anantamukhi [Literature]
Arapacana [Book and Sword]
Arcismati [Bhumis]
Arhat [A Saint]
Arthapratisamvit [Logical Analysis]
Arya-Tara [Sakti]
Asokakanta [avatar Marici]
Asokottamasri [Physician]
Astabhuja-Kurukulla [avatar Kurukulla]
Asura [Group of Demons]
Avalokitesvara(Avalokita, Lokesvara) [Dhyani Present Age]
Ayurvasita[One vasitas]
Balaparamita [Philosophy]
Bhaisajyaguru(Sman-bla, Otaci,Yao-shih-fo, Yakushi)[Physician]
Bhima[Attendant]
Bhrkuti[Female]
Bhrkuti-Tara [Mother]
Bhumi [Spiritual Spheres]
Bhutadarma [Demon Controller]
Bi-har [Protector]
Bodhidharma [Monk]
Bodhisattva (Chinese Pu-sa) [Born to be Englightened]
Buddhabodhiprabhavasita [Vasitas]
Buddhalocana [Female Buddha]
Budha [Mercury]
Butcho [?]
Chandarosana [Mahayana]
Charcika (Carcika) [Mahayana]
Chakravartin [World Ruler]
Chattrosnisa [An Usnisa]
Chaturmaharajas (Caturmaharajas) [Four Great Kings]
Chittavista [Vashitas]
Citipati [Graveyard Demons]
Cunda [Literature]
Da-shi-zhi [Bodhisattva]
Dadimunda [Temples]
Dainichi' [Purity/Wisdom]
Dakini [Demons]
Dala Kadavara [Demon]
Devaputra [Gods of Lower Rank]
Dhanada [avatar Amoghasiddhi]
Dharani [Mystical Texts]
Dharmadhatuvagisvara [Dharma]
Dharmakirtisagaraghosa [Physician]
Dharmamegha [Bhumis]
Dharmapala ,Chinese Fu Ha [Protective Dieties]
Dharmapratisamvit [Nature Analysis]
Dharmavasita [Vasitas]
Dhritarashtra (Pali Dhatarattha) [One of the 4 World Guardians]
Dhupa [Mother]
Dhupatara [Mahayana]
Dhvajagrakeyura [avatar Aksobhya]
Dhyanaparamita [Philosophy]
Dhyani-Bodhisattvas [Five Bodhisattvas]
Dhyani-Buddhas [Five Meditators]
Di-zang [Bodhisattvas of Hell]
Dvarapala [?]
Ekajata [Terrible]
Emma-o [Judges the Dead]
Fudo [WIsdom]
Guan Yin [bodhisattva]
Hariti [Ate Children]
Hayagriva [Protection]
Heruka [Protection]
Hevajra [Protection]
Ida-Ten [Law/Monestaries]
Jambhala [avatar Vausravana]
Janguli [Snakebite cure]
Jian Lao [Earth/Permanence]
Jizo [Compassion]
Juichimen [Mercy]
Kali devia [avatar Lha-mo]
Kannon [Japanese bodhisattva]
Khasarpana(Khasarpana-Lokesvara) [Indian bodhisattva]
Ki Fudo [avatar Fudo-Myo-o]
Krodhadevatas [Inspire Terror]
Ksitigarbha [One of 8 bodhisattva]
Kuan-yin (Kwannon) [Mercy]
Kujaku Myoo [Esoteric]
Kurukulla [?]
Locana [?]
Mahasthamaprata [Chinese bodhisattva]
Maitreya [Future]
Manjughosa [Nepalese bodhisattva]
Manjusri [bodhisattva]
Mara [Evil]
Marici [Sun]
Mi-lo Fo (Pu-Sa) [Chinese bodhisattva
Miroku [Japanese bodhisattva
Mo-Li [Protects Temples]
Padmanartesvara [avatar Bodhisattva Avalokitesvara]
Pancaraksa[5 Goddesses]
Pandara [?]
Paramasva [?]
Parnasavari [?]
Prajna [Femaleness]
Prajnaparamita [Buddhist Text]
Ran-deng [Beggar and Future Buddha]
Ratnapani [Dhyani-Bodhisattva]
Ratnasambhava [Dhyani-Buddha]
Remanta [King of the Horse gods]
Sakyamuni [Japanese]
Samantabhadra [Bodhisattvas]
Saptaksara [avatar Heruka]
Shakra [King of the Gods]
Ssu Ta T'ien Wang [Kings of Heaven]
Sumbharaja [Buddhist Krodhadevata]
Tennin (Tennyo) [angels]
Usnisavijaya [?]
Vairocana [Dhyani-Buddhas]
Vaisravana (Pali Vessavana, Chinese Do Wen) [Guards World]
Vajrabhairava [?]
Vajrapani [Bodhisattvas]
Vajrasattva [Nepal Dhyani-Buddha]
Vajravarahi [?]
Vajrayogini [Initiation]
Vajrayogini [Riches]
Vidyadharas [?]
Vidyujjvalakarali [?]
Vighnantaka [?]
Virudhaka (Pali Virulha, Chinese Zheng Zhang) [Guards World]
Virupaksa (Pali Virupakkha, Chinese Guand Mu) [Guards Western Heaven]
Visvapani [Dhyani-Bodhisattva]
We-to [Divine General]
Yakushi Nyorai [Healing]
Yama [?]
Yamantaka [Krodhadevatas]
Zhu Dian (Zhu Tian) [Chinese Buddhist gods]
CHINESE GODS
Ao [Sea]
Awun [Destruction]
Ba [Drought]
Ba Gua [Basis of Divination]
Bo Hsian [Taoist]
Cai-Shen [Riches]
Can Cong [Silkworms]
Cao Guo-jiu [Actors]
Chang Fei [War]
Chang Hs'ien [Children]
Chang Kuo-lao [?]
Ch'ang E (Ch'ang-o Huang E) [Moon]
Chang Tao Ling [Afterlife]
Cheng-huang (Ch'eng Huang) [Guardians]
Chen Jen [Spiritual Beings]
Cheng San-Kung [Fishermen]
Cheng Yuan Ho (Ch'ang-o Huang E) [Buskers]
Chih Nu [Weavers]
Chih Sung-Tzu (Chi Sung Tzu) [Rain]
Chih-Yu [Inventor]
Ch'in-Shu-Pao [Guardian]
Chou Wang [Sodomy]
Chu-Chuan Shen [Pigsties]
Chu Jung [Fire]
Chu Lung [Day/Night]
Chung K'uei [Afterlife]
Chung-li Ch'uan [Immortal]
Confucius [Philosopher]
Di Zhang Xia [?]
Dong-yo Da-di [Helps Sky God]
Erh-Lang [Guardian]
Fan-K'uei [Butchers]
Fei Lien (Fei Lian) [Wind]
Feng-Huang (Hoang-female Phuong-male) [Many Meanings]
Feng Po (Feng-Po) [Human form of the wind]
Feng P'o-p'o (Feng-Po-Po) [Female wind]
Fo [Buddha]
Fu His [Taught Humanity]
Fu Hsing [Happiness]
Fu Shen [Happiness]
Fu-Shou-Lu [Collection of Gods]
Fu-xi [Hero]
Gao Yao (Ting-jian) [Judgement]
Gong Gong [Common Workers]
Gou Mang and Ru Shou [Messengers]
Guan Di (Kuan Ti) [War/Fortune Telling]
Gui Xian [Demon]
Han Hsiang [Immortal]
Han Xiang-zi [Immortal]
He Bo (Bing-yi) [Rivers]
Heng E (Change-e) [Moon]
He Xian-gu [Immortal]
Heng-Ha-Erh-Chiang [Temples]
Heng-o [Moon]
Ho Hsien-ku [Immortal]
Ho Po [River]
Hou Chi [Harvest]
Hou I [Archer]
Hou T'u [Earth]
Hsien [Taoists]
Hsi Ho [Sun's Creator]
Hsi Wang Mu [Guardian]
Hsuan-T'ien-Shang-Ti [Dark Heaven]
Hua Hsien [Flower]
Huang-di (Huang Ti) (Shun) [Hero]
Huang Fei-hu (Fei) [Mountain]
Hu-Shen [Hail]
I [Bowmen]
Infoniwoo [Generation]
I-Ti [Wine]
K'ai Lu Shen [Purges Evil]
Kuan Yu [War]
K'uei Hsing [Examinations]
Lan Cai-he [Immortal]
Lao T'ien Yeh [Supreme]
Lao-Tzu (Lao-zi) [Philosopher]
Lei Kung [Storm]
Lei-zi [Thunder]
Li [Fire]
Li Tie-guai [Immortal]
Liu [Crops]
Lu Dong-bin (Lu Yan) [Immortal]
Lu-Hsing [Salaries/Employees]
Lung Wang [Dragon King]
Lupan [Carpenters]
Ma-Mien [Bureaucrat]
Meng (Meng P'o) [Underworld]
Meng-T'ien [Writing Brush]
Men Shen [Doors, includes sometimes Wei Cheng]
Mu Gong [Immortals]
Niu-Y'oun [Police]
Nu Gua (Nu Kua, Nu Wa) [Creator and Marriage]
O-Mi-T'o Fo [Amitabha]
Pa [Drought]
Pa-Cha [Anti-locusts]
Pa-Hsien [Eight Immortals]
P'an-Chin-Lien [Prostitues]
'P'an Ku (Panku, Pangu) [Cosmos]
Pi-Hsia-Yuan-Chun [Childbirth]
Puhsien [Sun]
Ran-deng [Future Buddha]
San Ch'inga [Three Taos]
Shang Di (Shang Ti) [Supreme]
She Chi (Thu) [Earth]
Shen [Spirit]
Sheng Jen [Holy]
Shen-nong(Shen Nung) [Hero]
Shen-T'u [Guardian]
Shen Yi [Sun]
Shiang Ku [Magician]
Shih-Tien Yen-Wang [Committe of Ten]
Shou-Hsing [Longevity]
Shou Lao (Shou Xing Lao Tou-zi) [Long Life]
Shou-Ts'ang [Servant]
Shui-Fu [Water]
Shui-Kuan [Defender]
Ssu Ming [Life and Death]
Sung-Chiang [Theives]
Sun Hou-Tzu [Monkey]
Sun Hou-zi [Apes]
Sun-Pin [Cobblers]
T'ai I [High]
Tai-sui-xing [Time]
Tai-yi [Sky]
T'ai Yueh Ta Ti (Tung-Yueh-Ta-Ti, T'ai-Yo, Ta-Ti) [Peak]
Thu [Earth]
Tian [Sky]
Tian-zhu [Catholic]
Tien (T'ien) [Sky]
Tien-Hou (T'ien Fei) [Heaven]
T'ien-Kuan [Happiness]
T'ien Lung [Dragon]
Tien Mu [Lightening]
Tien-Wang (Mo-Li) [Kings]
Ti-Kuan [Foregiveness]
Ti Nu (Ti-ya) [Earth]
Ti-Tsang-Wang-Pu-Sa [Mercy]
Ti Yu [Afterlife]
Tou Nu [North Star]
Ts'ai-Lun [Stationers]
Ts'ai Shen [Wealth]
Tsan [Demons]
Ts'ang Chien [Hearth]
Tsao Shen [?]
Tsao-Wang [Hearth]
Tu [Earth]
Tung Wang Kung [Ruled Male Immortals]
T'u-ti (Ti-Ti) [Locality]
Wang [Palace Door]
Wang-Mu-Niang-Niang [Guardian]
Wen Ch'ang (Wen-Chang-Ta-Ti) [Literature]
Wen-Shu Yen-K'ung [Manjushri]
Wen Pu [Epidemics]
Wu Ti [Myth]
Xian [Spirits]
Xi-Wang-mu [Immortality]
Yama [Seventh hell]
Yan-lo (Yan Wang) [Underworld Prince]
Yao [Wind Conqueror]
Yao-shi-fo [Physician]
Yao Wang [Medicine]
Yeng-Wang-Yeh [Death]
Yen Wang (Yen Lo) [Underworld Judge]
Yin and Yang [Male and Female]
Yo Fei [War]
Yu-Chiang [Ocean Winds]
Yu-di (Yu Huang) [Supreme]
Yueh Fei [War]
Yu Huang (Yu-Huang-Shang-Ti) [High]
Yun T'ung [Clouds]
Yu-qiang [Sea]
Yu Shih [Rain]
Yu-tzu [Rain]
Zao Jun [Kitchen]
Zhang Guo-lao [Immortal]
Zhong-Kui [Literature and Examinations]
Zhong-li Quan [Immortal]
[Sources: Brief History of Ancient Chinese Mythology]
Finnish Gods:
Ahto [Water]
Akka [Harvest]
Egres [Vegetation/Fertility]
Hiisi [Forest/Evil]
Ilma [Air]
Ilmarinen [Sky]
Inmar [Sky]
Juma [Sky]
Jumala (Mader-Atcha, Ukk) [Thunder+]
Kalevanpojat [Demons]
Kalma [Death]
Kekri [Fertility Feast]
Kipu-Tytto [Illness]
Kondos [Sowing Crops]
Kuu [Moon]
Lemminkainen [Hero]
Louhi [Sorcery/Evil]
Loviatar [Disease]
Luonnotar [Creator]
Madderakka [Dwarves]
Maahiset [Dwarves]
Naaki [Water]
Nyrckes [?]
Olmai (Olmay) [Divine properties]
Pajainen [?]
Pajonn [Thunder]
Para [Goblin Like]
Pellonpekko [Barley]
Raudna [?]
Rutu [Devil]
Sampsa [Vegetation]
Seides [Stones]
Rauni [?]
Tapio [Forest]
Tiermes [Thunder]
Tuoni [Underworld
Tursas [Monster]
Ukko (Isainen) [Thunder]
Vainamoinen [Hero]
Veralden-radien [World Pillars]
Waralden Olmai [World]
JAPANESE GODS
Aji-Suki-Taka-Hi-Kone (Aji-Shiki-Taka-Hiko-Ne) [Thunder]
Ama-No-Minakanushi-No-Kumi [Pole Star]
Ame-No-Oshido-Mimi [Refusal]
Ama-No-Uzume [Fertility]
Ama-Tsu-Kami [Heavenly Gods]
Amatsu Mikaboshi [Evil]
Ame-No-Hohi [Disappeared]
Ame-No-Wakahiko [Ruled Earth]
Bimbo-Gami [Poverty]
Bishamon [War]
Chimata-No-Kami [Rain/Sea]
Daikoku [Wealth]
Ebisu [Labor]
Fuchi [Fire]
Fukurokuju (Fukuro kuju) [Wisdom]
Futsunushi [Lightening]
Gozu-Tenno [Plague]
Haya-Ji (Haya-Tsu-Muji-No-Kami) [Whirlwind]
Hikohohodemi [Hero]
Hinokagutsuchi [Fire]
Hiruko [Morning Sun]
Hoderi [?]
Hisa-Me [Devils]
Ho-Masubi (Kagu Zuchi) [Fire]
Hosuseri [?]
Hotei [Laughter]
Inari [Prosperity]
Izanagi [Creator]
Izanami [Mother]
Jikoku [Guardians]
Jimmu Tenno [Founder]
Jurojin (Jorojin) [Longevity]
Kagu-tsuchi [Fire]
Kamado-gami [Hearth]
Kami [Divinities]
Kami-Musubi (Kami-mi-masubi) [?]
Kami-Nari [Thunder]
Kamui [Sky]
Kappa [Water]
Kawa-No-Kami [Rivers]
Kishijoten [Luck]
Kishimojin [Demon]
Komoku [South]
Kompira [Wealth]
Kono-Hana-Sakuya-Hime (Kono-no-hana-saku-ya-hime) [?]
Kono-Hana-Sakuya-Hime Kuni-Toko-tachi [First]
Kuni-Tsu-Kami [Earth]
Kura-Okami [Rain/Snow]
Nai-No-Kami [Earthquakes]
Naka-Yama-Tsu-Mi [Mountain Slopes]
Ningyo [Mermaid]
Ninigi [Ruler Earth]
O-Kuni-Nushi (Okuninushi) [Medicine/Sorcery]
Onamuji [Earth]
Omiwa [Protective]
Oni [Demons]
O-Wata-Tsumi [Sea]
O-Yama-Tsu-Mi (O-yama-tsuni) [Mountain]
Raiden [Thunder]
Ryo-Wo [Sea]
Ryujin (Ryugin) [Thunder/Rain]
Sae-No-Kami [Roads]
Sengen-Sama [Guarded Holy Moutain]
Sennin [Immortals]
Shichi-Fukujin [Luck]
Shiko-Me [Devils]
Shine-Tsu-Hiko [Wind]
Shitatera-Hime [?]
Shi-tenno [Cardinal Direction Guardians]
Shojo [Satyrs]
Soko-No-Kuni [Underworld]
Suitengu [Sea]
Sukuna-bikone (Suku-na-biko) [Hot Springs]
Shoki [Enemy of Devils]
Susanowo (Susanoo, Susa-no-wo) [Storms]
Takamimusubi (Taka-mi-masubi) [Royal Family]
Takemikadzuchi [Thunder]
Take-Mi-Musubi [Sun]
Taki-Tsu-Hiko [Rain]
Tatsuta-hime [Autumn]
Ten-gu (Tengu) [Mountain/Forest]
Tenjin (Temmangu) [Learning/Calligraphy]
Tsuki-Yomi (Tsukiyomi) [Moon]
Uji-gami [Ancestors]
Uke-Mochi-No-Kami (Ukemochi, Waka-Uke-Nomi, Toyo-Uke-Bime) [Fertility and
Food]
Uzume [Mirth]
Wakahiru-me [Rising Sun]\
Wata-tsu-mi [Sea]
Yabune [House]
Zocho [South]
Shinto Amaterasu [Sun]
Ama-Tsu-Mara [Smiths]
Ame-No-Kagase-Wo [Astral]
Ame-No-Mi-Kumari-No-Kami [Water]
Amenominakanushi (Ame-No-Minaka-Nushi-No-Kami) [Supreme]
Am-No-Tanabata-Hime-No-Mikoto [Weavers]
Ame-No-Toko-Tachi-No-Kami [Elemental]
Ame-no-uzume [Dancers]
Benten (Benten-San, Benzaiten, Benzaiten) [Eloquence+]
Fujin [Wind]
Hachiman [War]
Ho-musubi [Fire]
Kami [Idols]
SOUTH ASIAN GODS
Cao Dai(Chinese: Gao-Tai) [Supreme]
Debata [?]
Empung Luminuut [?]
Hainuwele [?]
Hananim [Sky]
Hmin [Ague]
Karei [Supreme]
Kinharingan [Creator]
Kud [Evil]
Laseo [Sun]
Lature Dano [Supreme]
Lowalangi(Lowalani) [World Above]
Mahatala (Mahataral) [Supreme?]
Ma-zu [?]
Nanmata (Namite) [Primeval]
Narbrooi [Woodlands]
Nemu [Primodial]
Palk [Sun]
Puang Matowa [Sky]
Pulug [Thunder]
Reahu [Dark Demon]
Rigenmucha [Supreme]
Silewe Nazarata [?]
Sirao [First]
Ta Pedn [?]
Tnong [Sun]
Tumbrenjak [Original Man]
Upulevo [Sun]
Wunekau [Sun]
CENRAL AND WEST ASIAN GODS
Abyrga [Snake]
Afi [Rain/Thunderstorms]
Aitvaras [Evil]
Alardi [Spirit]
Aralo [Agriculutre]
Armaz [Supreme]
Auseklis (Ausrine) [Stellar]
Baba [Spirit]
Baba Yaga (Jezi-Baba) [Ogress]
Bagvarti [?]
Bangputys [Sea]
Bannik [Baths]
Bagisht [Flood/Prosperity]
Barastir (Barastaer) [Underworld]
Bardha [Elves]
Beg-tse (Cam-srin) [War]
Beng [Satan]
Biegg-Olmai [Wind]
Bogatyri [Heroes]
Boldogasszony (Kisboldogasszony) [Protector Women/Children]
Bolla (Bullar) [Demon]
Buga [Supreme]
Bukura e dheut
[Good Spirit]
Bukuri e qiellit [Jehovah]
Byelobog (Bielbog) [?]
Byelun [?]
Chernobo(Czarnobog, Czerneboch, Cernobog) [?]
Chors [Sun]
Dabog [Sun]
Deive [Stone Spirits]
Dieva deli [?]
Dievini [Less Known Gods]
Dievs [Sky]
Djall [Devil]
Domovoi (Domovoy) [Household]
Donbittir [Water/Fish]
Drag-gshed [Eight Terrible Gods]
Dud [Heavenly Spirit]
Dvorovoi [Courtyard]
Dyavo [Demons]
En [?]
Erlik [King of the Dead]
Es [Sky]
Fatit [Destiny]
Fene [Demon]
Gabija (Gabieta, Gabeta) [Fire]
Gabjauja [Corn]
Giltine [Death]
Guta [Demon]
Hadur [War]
Himavat [Himalayas]
Horagalles [War]
Isdustaya and Papaya [Fate]
Isten [Supreme]
Jagaubis [Fire]
Jarovit (Gerovitus) [War]
Jessis [avatar Jupiter]
Jumis [Fertility]
Juras Mate [Water]
Kaka-Guia [Funerary]
Kalvis [Smith]
Karta [Fate]
Kaukas [?]
Khors [Health/Hunting]
Khyung-gai mGo-can [?]
Kikimora [Household]
K'op'ala [Protective]
Kukuth (Kukudhi) [Sickness]
Kulshedra (Kucedre) [Demon]
Kun-tu-bzan-po [Chief Bon]
Kupala [Water/Magic/Herbs]
Kurdalaegon [Blacksmiths]
Laima [Fate]
Lamaria [Hearth]
Laskowice (Leshcia) [Forest]
Lauka Mate [Fields/Fertility]
Laume [Fairy]
Leshy [Forest]
Lha [Bon Gods]
Lhamo [?]
Ljeschi (Lychie) [Fauns and Satyrs]
Ljubi [Demon]
Manzasiri [Primeval]
Mate [Mother]
Mati Syra Zemlya [Earth]
Medeine (Mejdejn) [Woods]
Meness [Moon]
Menulis [Moon]
Meza Mate [Nature]
Mirsa [Light]
Mokos [Fertility]
Mu (rMu) [Heavenly]
Muma Padura [Wood]
Myesyats (Czarnobog, Czerneboch, Cernobog) [Moon]
Nang Lha [Household]
Nari [Demon]
Nari [Sky]
Num [Sky]
Odqan [Fire]
Ora [Protective]
Ordog [Dark]
Pekar (Pehar) [Demon]
Peko [Barley]
Perendi [Jehovah]
Perit [Mountain Spirits]
Perkons [Thunder]
Perkunas [Thunder]
Perun (Peroun) [Thunder]
Polevik [Field]
Poludnitsa [Field]
Pon [Sky]
Porenutius (Porevit) [?]
Preas Eyn [?]
Preas Eyssaur [Destructive]
Preas Prohm [Primeval]
Prende (Prenne) [Love]
Psezpolnica (Polish Poludnica) [Midday]
Pugu [Sun]
Qormusta (Chormusta) [High]
Rugievit [War]
Rusalki (Rusalka) [Water/Woodlands]
Safa [Weapens]
Sanda [?]
Sarkany [Weather]
Saule [Sun]
Saules meitas [?]
Selardi [Moon]
Shen-Lha-od-dkar [Bon]
Shen-rab [Founder Bon]
Sipe Gyalmo [Bon]
Shiwini [Sun]
Shosshu [Smiths]
Siwini [Sun]
Srat [Demon]
Sri [Demon]
Sridevi [?]
Stribog [Winds]
Svantevit (Svantoveit, Svantovitus) [War/Agriculture]
Svarog [Sky]
Syen [Guardian]
Stihi [Demon]
Teljavelik [Heavenly Smith]
Telyaveli [Smiths]
Tengri [Heavenly Beings]
Tesheba [Weather]
Thab-lha [Hearth]
Triglav (Trigelawus) [War]
Uacilla [Thunder/Rain]
Ulgen [Creator]
Urme [Fate]
Usins [?]
Vadatajs [Evil]
Vampire [Soul of Dead]
Veela [Kindess]
Veja mate [Winds]
Veles (Volos) [Underworld]
Velnias [Devil]
Velu mate [Dead]
Verbti [Fire/North Wind]
Vila [Water]
Vilkacis (Lithuanian Vilkatas) [Werewolf]
Vlkodlaks (Vookodlaks) [Werewolf]
Vodnik [Demon]
Vodyanoi [Water]
Volos (Volusu) [Cattle]
We [Supreme]
Xhindi [Spirits]
Yarilo [Love]
Zaltys [Grass Snake]
Zemepatis (Zemempatis) [Supreme]
Zemes mate [Mother]
Zemyna (Zemyneles) [Earth]
Zorya [Guardian]
Zvezda Dennitsa and Zvezda Vechernyaya [Morning and Evening Star]
SIBERIAN GODS
Ai Tojon [Light]
Ajysyt [Mother]
Anky-Kele [Sea]
Ayi [Creator]
Hittavainen, Hittauanin [Hare-Hunters]
Hinkon [Death Demon]
K'daai [Fire Demon]
Kaltes [The Goddess]
Ke'lets [Death Demon]
Kurkil [Creator]
Kutkinnaku [Good Spirit]
Mayin [Supreme]
Picvu'cin [Hunting/Wild Animals]
Shurdi [Thunderstorms]
Tomam [Bird]
Tomor(Tomorr) [Father Creator]
Xucau [Supreme]
Ye'loje (Pugu) [Sun]
.
|
|
| User: "gatekeeper" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
05 Oct 2006 07:48:03 PM |
|
|
Free Lunch wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:24:56 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<qnhVg.41466$KR1.17531@bignews2.bellsouth.net>:
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:yfdVg.18299$GY5.15585@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:CC8Vg.47643$vX5.11786@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:UU7Vg.41040$KR1.1841@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%U%Ug.18260$GY5.16246@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:JoQUg.25832$8s6.18829@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Giant Waffle" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:37j7i2p0pc1h89oes651ibf3u652c5rrbh@4ax.com...
On 4 Oct 2006 07:52:19 -0700, "David Schwartz"
<davids@webmaster.com> you decided to say:
Giant Waffle wrote:
He has performed and proved He is God. But not on demand.
He is not a circus act.
You can't have it both ways.
I'm not seeking to.
You can argue that god has no problem providing clear evidence.
I said that He is not a circus act, that performs on demand.
He has provided evidence. You choose to believe it never
happened. Your choice. But if He did it again, I wonder
what people would be saying 2,000 years from now?
Demanding the same circus act performer again, no doubt.
It is you who wants it both ways. You want Him to be God
and yet, to also be a circus act that performs on your demand,
thereby making yourself His boss, thereby making yourself
God. So why don't you perform a few miracles for us?
Pure ***** and nonsesne 'with no evidence"!
Yes, I believe there is a God with all my heart, mind and soul.
But I have no need to prove anything to someone who crossposts
to Christian Newsgroups for the purpose of flaming and denouncing
that which he can never understand.
Dan Wood
Just an all to typical Christian cop out!
Nope: statement of FACT!
Why are you unable to supply ANY!?
There's a difference in being _unable_ and unwilling to supply
evidence to someone who is so biased and unreceptive. It
would be utter futile and pointless.
Dan Wood, DDS
Nonsense. If you tell us that someone has dental caries, you can offer
objective evidence to show that those caries exist. The person you are
telling might not want to hear about it, but with your evidence, you can
persuade them. Unfortunately for you, you have made an assertion about
something that you do not have evidence for and you falsely call your
beliefs evidence, much like a dental fraud who, without even looking
into my mouth, tells me that I need to have all of my teeth removed.
Much as you, took the evidence provided, and without taking a look,
pitched it all in the trash, and then maintain that you have used a
rational approach to prove that the God of the Bible, is just based on
the traditions of man. Yeah, you are a shiny example of rational
scientific process! Nice try, but no cigar! And I don't smoke!
The Eastgate is open, the King is in residence! Whomsoever will, may
come in!
Gatekeeper
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
05 Oct 2006 08:00:50 PM |
|
|
On 5 Oct 2006 17:48:03 -0700, in alt.atheism
"gatekeeper" <gatekeeper.eastgate@hotmail.com> wrote in
<1160095683.629765.191640@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>:
Free Lunch wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:24:56 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<qnhVg.41466$KR1.17531@bignews2.bellsouth.net>:
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:yfdVg.18299$GY5.15585@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:CC8Vg.47643$vX5.11786@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:UU7Vg.41040$KR1.1841@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%U%Ug.18260$GY5.16246@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:JoQUg.25832$8s6.18829@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Giant Waffle" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:37j7i2p0pc1h89oes651ibf3u652c5rrbh@4ax.com...
On 4 Oct 2006 07:52:19 -0700, "David Schwartz"
<davids@webmaster.com> you decided to say:
Giant Waffle wrote:
He has performed and proved He is God. But not on demand.
He is not a circus act.
You can't have it both ways.
I'm not seeking to.
You can argue that god has no problem providing clear evidence.
I said that He is not a circus act, that performs on demand.
He has provided evidence. You choose to believe it never
happened. Your choice. But if He did it again, I wonder
what people would be saying 2,000 years from now?
Demanding the same circus act performer again, no doubt.
It is you who wants it both ways. You want Him to be God
and yet, to also be a circus act that performs on your demand,
thereby making yourself His boss, thereby making yourself
God. So why don't you perform a few miracles for us?
Pure ***** and nonsesne 'with no evidence"!
Yes, I believe there is a God with all my heart, mind and soul.
But I have no need to prove anything to someone who crossposts
to Christian Newsgroups for the purpose of flaming and denouncing
that which he can never understand.
Dan Wood
Just an all to typical Christian cop out!
Nope: statement of FACT!
Why are you unable to supply ANY!?
There's a difference in being _unable_ and unwilling to supply
evidence to someone who is so biased and unreceptive. It
would be utter futile and pointless.
Dan Wood, DDS
Nonsense. If you tell us that someone has dental caries, you can offer
objective evidence to show that those caries exist. The person you are
telling might not want to hear about it, but with your evidence, you can
persuade them. Unfortunately for you, you have made an assertion about
something that you do not have evidence for and you falsely call your
beliefs evidence, much like a dental fraud who, without even looking
into my mouth, tells me that I need to have all of my teeth removed.
Much as you, took the evidence provided,
Cite one specific piece of evidence that was provided. Just one.
and without taking a look, pitched it all in the trash,
I had no evidence provided. Show one piece to me.
and then maintain that you have used a
rational approach to prove that the God of the Bible, is just based on
the traditions of man. Yeah, you are a shiny example of rational
scientific process! Nice try, but no cigar! And I don't smoke!
No, you just make things up and then act all hurt when people don't buy
your claims.
The Eastgate is open, the King is in residence! Whomsoever will, may
come in!
Gatekeeper
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
05 Oct 2006 09:36:19 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:26:44 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:UU7Vg.41040$KR1.1841@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%U%Ug.18260$GY5.16246@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:JoQUg.25832$8s6.18829@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Giant Waffle" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:37j7i2p0pc1h89oes651ibf3u652c5rrbh@4ax.com...
On 4 Oct 2006 07:52:19 -0700, "David Schwartz"
<davids@webmaster.com> you decided to say:
Giant Waffle wrote:
He has performed and proved He is God. But not on demand.
He is not a circus act.
You can't have it both ways.
I'm not seeking to.
You can argue that god has no problem providing clear evidence.
I said that He is not a circus act, that performs on demand.
He has provided evidence. You choose to believe it never
happened. Your choice. But if He did it again, I wonder
what people would be saying 2,000 years from now?
Demanding the same circus act performer again, no doubt.
It is you who wants it both ways. You want Him to be God
and yet, to also be a circus act that performs on your demand,
thereby making yourself His boss, thereby making yourself
God. So why don't you perform a few miracles for us?
Pure ***** and nonsesne 'with no evidence"!
Yes, I believe there is a God with all my heart, mind and soul.
But I have no need to prove anything to someone who crossposts
to Christian Newsgroups for the purpose of flaming and denouncing
that which he can never understand.
Dan Wood
Just an all to typical Christian cop out!
Nope: statement of FACT!
No, dishonesty.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
05 Oct 2006 07:12:42 PM |
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:e26ai2pfjt2tddo705j06e5iq0tusg0siq@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:26:44 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:UU7Vg.41040$KR1.1841@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%U%Ug.18260$GY5.16246@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:JoQUg.25832$8s6.18829@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Giant Waffle" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:37j7i2p0pc1h89oes651ibf3u652c5rrbh@4ax.com...
On 4 Oct 2006 07:52:19 -0700, "David Schwartz"
<davids@webmaster.com> you decided to say:
Giant Waffle wrote:
He has performed and proved He is God. But not on demand.
He is not a circus act.
You can't have it both ways.
I'm not seeking to.
You can argue that god has no problem providing clear evidence.
I said that He is not a circus act, that performs on demand.
He has provided evidence. You choose to believe it never
happened. Your choice. But if He did it again, I wonder
what people would be saying 2,000 years from now?
Demanding the same circus act performer again, no doubt.
It is you who wants it both ways. You want Him to be God
and yet, to also be a circus act that performs on your demand,
thereby making yourself His boss, thereby making yourself
God. So why don't you perform a few miracles for us?
Pure ***** and nonsesne 'with no evidence"!
Yes, I believe there is a God with all my heart, mind and soul.
But I have no need to prove anything to someone who crossposts
to Christian Newsgroups for the purpose of flaming and denouncing
that which he can never understand.
Dan Wood
Just an all to typical Christian cop out!
Nope: statement of FACT!
No, dishonesty.
There is evidence that convinces me, it is a pointless waste of time
to try to convince someone who is so filled with that God is
Love!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
05 Oct 2006 07:20:48 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:12:42 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<YbhVg.41459$KR1.28318@bignews2.bellsouth.net>:
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:e26ai2pfjt2tddo705j06e5iq0tusg0siq@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:26:44 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:UU7Vg.41040$KR1.1841@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%U%Ug.18260$GY5.16246@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:JoQUg.25832$8s6.18829@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Giant Waffle" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:37j7i2p0pc1h89oes651ibf3u652c5rrbh@4ax.com...
On 4 Oct 2006 07:52:19 -0700, "David Schwartz"
<davids@webmaster.com> you decided to say:
Giant Waffle wrote:
He has performed and proved He is God. But not on demand.
He is not a circus act.
You can't have it both ways.
I'm not seeking to.
You can argue that god has no problem providing clear evidence.
I said that He is not a circus act, that performs on demand.
He has provided evidence. You choose to believe it never
happened. Your choice. But if He did it again, I wonder
what people would be saying 2,000 years from now?
Demanding the same circus act performer again, no doubt.
It is you who wants it both ways. You want Him to be God
and yet, to also be a circus act that performs on your demand,
thereby making yourself His boss, thereby making yourself
God. So why don't you perform a few miracles for us?
Pure ***** and nonsesne 'with no evidence"!
Yes, I believe there is a God with all my heart, mind and soul.
But I have no need to prove anything to someone who crossposts
to Christian Newsgroups for the purpose of flaming and denouncing
that which he can never understand.
Dan Wood
Just an all to typical Christian cop out!
Nope: statement of FACT!
No, dishonesty.
There is evidence that convinces me, it is a pointless waste of time
to try to convince someone who is so filled with that God is
Love!
You are posting in alt.atheism and whining about the fact that people
who respond to you are not Christian. You assert that there is evidence
that convinces you, but you cannot provide a lick of evidence. When
asked about that lack of evidence, you got all high-and-mighty and
started insulting those who would presume to question your unsupported
assertions.
My, my, my. What would Jesus say?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
05 Oct 2006 08:45:50 PM |
|
|
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:p58bi252sabvr3jq6soparmi55fmlf8kep@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:12:42 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<YbhVg.41459$KR1.28318@bignews2.bellsouth.net>:
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:e26ai2pfjt2tddo705j06e5iq0tusg0siq@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:26:44 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:UU7Vg.41040$KR1.1841@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%U%Ug.18260$GY5.16246@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:JoQUg.25832$8s6.18829@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Giant Waffle" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:37j7i2p0pc1h89oes651ibf3u652c5rrbh@4ax.com...
On 4 Oct 2006 07:52:19 -0700, "David Schwartz"
<davids@webmaster.com> you decided to say:
Giant Waffle wrote:
He has performed and proved He is God. But not on demand.
He is not a circus act.
You can't have it both ways.
I'm not seeking to.
You can argue that god has no problem providing clear evidence.
I said that He is not a circus act, that performs on demand.
He has provided evidence. You choose to believe it never
happened. Your choice. But if He did it again, I wonder
what people would be saying 2,000 years from now?
Demanding the same circus act performer again, no doubt.
It is you who wants it both ways. You want Him to be God
and yet, to also be a circus act that performs on your demand,
thereby making yourself His boss, thereby making yourself
God. So why don't you perform a few miracles for us?
Pure ***** and nonsesne 'with no evidence"!
Yes, I believe there is a God with all my heart, mind and soul.
But I have no need to prove anything to someone who crossposts
to Christian Newsgroups for the purpose of flaming and denouncing
that which he can never understand.
Dan Wood
Just an all to typical Christian cop out!
Nope: statement of FACT!
No, dishonesty.
There is evidence that convinces me, it is a pointless waste of time
to try to convince someone who is so filled with that God is
Love!
You are posting in alt.atheism and whining about the fact that people
who respond to you are not Christian. You assert that there is evidence
that convinces you, but you cannot provide a lick of evidence. When
asked about that lack of evidence, you got all high-and-mighty and
started insulting those who would presume to question your unsupported
assertions.
1th - Bill M an atheist, crossposted the initial header to at least
four (4) religious and Christian newsgroups. This is not his first time.
I only responded to the pre-existing NGs already listed.
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
Dan Wood
My, my, my. What would Jesus say?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uno-Hoo! Uno-Hoo@NOSPAMbigfootdotcom" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
06 Oct 2006 03:46:55 PM |
|
|
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gviVg.26747$8s6.7934@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:p58bi252sabvr3jq6soparmi55fmlf8kep@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:12:42 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<YbhVg.41459$KR1.28318@bignews2.bellsouth.net>:
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:e26ai2pfjt2tddo705j06e5iq0tusg0siq@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:26:44 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:UU7Vg.41040$KR1.1841@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%U%Ug.18260$GY5.16246@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:JoQUg.25832$8s6.18829@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
"Giant Waffle" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:37j7i2p0pc1h89oes651ibf3u652c5rrbh@4ax.com...
On 4 Oct 2006 07:52:19 -0700, "David Schwartz"
<davids@webmaster.com> you decided to say:
Giant Waffle wrote:
He has performed and proved He is God. But not on demand.
He is not a circus act.
You can't have it both ways.
I'm not seeking to.
You can argue that god has no problem providing clear
evidence.
I said that He is not a circus act, that performs on demand.
He has provided evidence. You choose to believe it never
happened. Your choice. But if He did it again, I wonder
what people would be saying 2,000 years from now?
Demanding the same circus act performer again, no doubt.
It is you who wants it both ways. You want Him to be God
and yet, to also be a circus act that performs on your demand,
thereby making yourself His boss, thereby making yourself
God. So why don't you perform a few miracles for us?
Pure ***** and nonsesne 'with no evidence"!
Yes, I believe there is a God with all my heart, mind and soul.
But I have no need to prove anything to someone who crossposts
to Christian Newsgroups for the purpose of flaming and denouncing
that which he can never understand.
Dan Wood
Just an all to typical Christian cop out!
Nope: statement of FACT!
No, dishonesty.
There is evidence that convinces me, it is a pointless waste of time
to try to convince someone who is so filled with that God is
Love!
You are posting in alt.atheism and whining about the fact that people
who respond to you are not Christian. You assert that there is evidence
that convinces you, but you cannot provide a lick of evidence. When
asked about that lack of evidence, you got all high-and-mighty and
started insulting those who would presume to question your unsupported
assertions.
1th - Bill M an atheist, crossposted the initial header to at least
four (4) religious and Christian newsgroups. This is not his first time.
I only responded to the pre-existing NGs already listed.
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
What evidence? There isn't any! Not one iota, not one jot, not one miniscule
speck. Religion = faith. Faith = accepting things for which there is no
evidence. Accepting things for which there is no evidence is both irrational
and illogical. Hence theists are both irrational and illogical.
Uno-Hoo!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
06 Oct 2006 03:27:03 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
You have not posted any evidence, liar. Nobody has. Ever.
There are no "biased, anti-religious types" outside your paranoid
fantasies - just people who are fed to the teeth with other people's
religion being imposed on them and also with the slanders you liars
use against them.
But then you already know all this.
I am honestly puzzled: why are you such a deliberately nasty,
personal liar?
Dan Wood
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
06 Oct 2006 09:04:36 AM |
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:if4ci215b2hibft5cv4ovqqhr7h6hp70pu@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
You have not posted any evidence, liar. Nobody has. Ever.
Okay Chris, point to the place in this thread where I claimed
to have posted any evidence.
I have maintained it is pointless and futile to post any evidence
to people with such biases as evidenced on this thread.
There are no "biased, anti-religious types" outside your paranoid
fantasies - just people who are fed to the teeth with other people's
religion being imposed on them and also with the slanders you liars
use against them.
But then you already know all this.
I am honestly puzzled: why are you such a deliberately nasty,
personal liar?
Is this always your tact - to make such unwarrented unjustified
accusations against those who disagre with your views?
Dan
Dan Wood
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill M" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
06 Oct 2006 01:54:45 PM |
|
|
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:TntVg.18454$vi3.14144@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:if4ci215b2hibft5cv4ovqqhr7h6hp70pu@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
You have not posted any evidence, liar. Nobody has. Ever.
Okay Chris, point to the place in this thread where I claimed
to have posted any evidence.
I have maintained it is pointless and futile to post any evidence
to people with such biases as evidenced on this thread.
This is a standard and typical 'cop out' statement by those that have NO
EVIDENCE to offer.
Why don't you just be an honest Christian and say you have none?
There are no "biased, anti-religious types" outside your paranoid
fantasies - just people who are fed to the teeth with other people's
religion being imposed on them and also with the slanders you liars
use against them.
But then you already know all this.
I am honestly puzzled: why are you such a deliberately nasty,
personal liar?
Is this always your tact - to make such unwarrented unjustified
accusations against those who disagre with your views?
Dan
Dan Wood
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
06 Oct 2006 08:05:19 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:54:45 -0400, "Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:TntVg.18454$vi3.14144@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:if4ci215b2hibft5cv4ovqqhr7h6hp70pu@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
You have not posted any evidence, liar. Nobody has. Ever.
Okay Chris, point to the place in this thread where I claimed
to have posted any evidence.
I have maintained it is pointless and futile to post any evidence
to people with such biases as evidenced on this thread.
This is a standard and typical 'cop out' statement by those that have NO
EVIDENCE to offer.
It's not just a cop out. It's a vicious personal slander.
He was lying about bias where the only bias is his.
He was lying about evidence. If anybody ever provided it, it would be
evaluated.
Why don't you just be an honest Christian and say you have none?
He can't. He daren't admit he has none, If he had he wouldn't nee to
lie about us to our faces.
There are no "biased, anti-religious types" outside your paranoid
fantasies - just people who are fed to the teeth with other people's
religion being imposed on them and also with the slanders you liars
use against them.
But then you already know all this.
I am honestly puzzled: why are you such a deliberately nasty,
personal liar?
Is this always your tact - to make such unwarrented unjustified
accusations against those who disagre with your views?
He's lying again. It's not about "accusations who disagree with my
views".
It's when he slanders us.
And calling him a liar when he does this is entirely warranted.
The tragedy is that he knows this.
But then he's the kind of Christian we've learned to recognise by
their fruits.
Dan
Dan Wood
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
06 Oct 2006 09:54:56 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:04:36 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:if4ci215b2hibft5cv4ovqqhr7h6hp70pu@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
You have not posted any evidence, liar. Nobody has. Ever.
Okay Chris, point to the place in this thread where I claimed
to have posted any evidence.
Then why do you lie about us "choosing to ignore it"?
I have maintained it is pointless and futile to post any evidence
to people with such biases as evidenced on this thread.
Yet another deliberately nasty, personal lie bvecause there is none
for us to ignore. Let alone "choose" to ignore. Let alone for
non-existant "bias" which exists only in your bigoted imagination.
Just like your clones, you talk about this alleged "evidence", never
provide it and lie about those outside your religion who have zero
reason to believe what you do. And who would never give it a thought
if you lot kept your religion to yourselves and never slandered us
for not believing what you do.
Please try to ne less dishonest next time.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
06 Oct 2006 01:42:33 PM |
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:d9rci21mt5j626s2fcrurakt4usolllb2s@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:04:36 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:if4ci215b2hibft5cv4ovqqhr7h6hp70pu@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
You have not posted any evidence, liar. Nobody has. Ever.
Okay Chris, point to the place in this thread where I claimed
to have posted any evidence.
Then why do you lie about us "choosing to ignore it"?
Where have I accused you of "choosing to ignore" anything?
Dan
<snip>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Les Hellawell" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
10 Oct 2006 04:27:49 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:42:33 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:d9rci21mt5j626s2fcrurakt4usolllb2s@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:04:36 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:if4ci215b2hibft5cv4ovqqhr7h6hp70pu@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
You have not posted any evidence, liar. Nobody has. Ever.
Okay Chris, point to the place in this thread where I claimed
to have posted any evidence.
Then why do you lie about us "choosing to ignore it"?
Where have I accused you of "choosing to ignore" anything?
Earlier you wrote:
"I have maintained it is pointless and futile to post any evidence
to people with such biases as evidenced on this thread."
Repeated above!
"Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me."
--
Les Hellawell
Greetings from:
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
10 Oct 2006 10:31:36 AM |
|
|
*I FOUND THIS ON ALT.RELIGION.CHRISTIAN*
"Les Hellawell" <myrubbishbin@notatleswell.freeuk.net> wrote in message
news:nlpmi29pgc73n7e3ems27k86vdp514aev1@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:42:33 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:d9rci21mt5j626s2fcrurakt4usolllb2s@4ax.com...
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:04:36 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:if4ci215b2hibft5cv4ovqqhr7h6hp70pu@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post
evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my
time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
You have not posted any evidence, liar. Nobody has. Ever.
Okay Chris, point to the place in this thread where I claimed
to have posted any evidence.
Then why do you lie about us "choosing to ignore it"?
Where have I accused you of "choosing to ignore" anything?
Earlier you wrote:
"I have maintained it is pointless and futile to post any evidence
to people with such biases as evidenced on this thread."
I've said absolutely _nothing_ about "choosing to ignore"
(the evidence). This is a false accusation! But there is no
doubt that there are biased, anti-Christian types invading
the above listed Christian NG's.
Repeated above!
"Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. Why waste
my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me."
As I have said several times I'm not a crusader. The evidence
is sufficient for me. Since I don't care about proving this to anyone
why does anyone think this is an emissary type effort?
And I repeat my statement that there are biased, anti-Christ types
on these above mentioned christian newsgroups.
--
Les Hellawell
Greetings from:
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
05 Oct 2006 09:02:35 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<gviVg.26747$8s6.7934@bignews4.bellsouth.net>:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:p58bi252sabvr3jq6soparmi55fmlf8kep@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:12:42 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<YbhVg.41459$KR1.28318@bignews2.bellsouth.net>:
....
There is evidence that convinces me, it is a pointless waste of time
to try to convince someone who is so filled with that God is
Love!
You are posting in alt.atheism and whining about the fact that people
who respond to you are not Christian. You assert that there is evidence
that convinces you, but you cannot provide a lick of evidence. When
asked about that lack of evidence, you got all high-and-mighty and
started insulting those who would presume to question your unsupported
assertions.
1th - Bill M an atheist, crossposted the initial header to at least
four (4) religious and Christian newsgroups. This is not his first time.
I only responded to the pre-existing NGs already listed.
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
Please learn what evidence means.
--
"... There's glory for you."
"I don't know what you mean by 'glory,'" Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiles contemptuously. "Of course you don't--till
I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!'"
"But glory doesn't mean "a nice knock-down argument," Alice objected.
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone,
"it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less."
"The question is," said Alice "whether you can make words mean so
many different things."
"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master--that's
all."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
05 Oct 2006 10:10:18 PM |
|
|
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:n8ebi2pi78at6kvrkho56vkbh2grsqur7k@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<gviVg.26747$8s6.7934@bignews4.bellsouth.net>:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:p58bi252sabvr3jq6soparmi55fmlf8kep@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:12:42 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<YbhVg.41459$KR1.28318@bignews2.bellsouth.net>:
...
There is evidence that convinces me, it is a pointless waste of time
to try to convince someone who is so filled with that God is
Love!
You are posting in alt.atheism and whining about the fact that people
who respond to you are not Christian. You assert that there is evidence
that convinces you, but you cannot provide a lick of evidence. When
asked about that lack of evidence, you got all high-and-mighty and
started insulting those who would presume to question your unsupported
assertions.
1th - Bill M an atheist, crossposted the initial header to at least
four (4) religious and Christian newsgroups. This is not his first time.
I only responded to the pre-existing NGs already listed.
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
Please learn what evidence means.
Please don't be insulting.
Dan
--
"... There's glory for you."
"I don't know what you mean by 'glory,'" Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiles contemptuously. "Of course you don't--till
I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!'"
"But glory doesn't mean "a nice knock-down argument," Alice objected.
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone,
"it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less."
"The question is," said Alice "whether you can make words mean so
many different things."
"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master--that's
all."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
06 Oct 2006 03:35:00 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:10:18 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:n8ebi2pi78at6kvrkho56vkbh2grsqur7k@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<gviVg.26747$8s6.7934@bignews4.bellsouth.net>:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:p58bi252sabvr3jq6soparmi55fmlf8kep@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:12:42 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<YbhVg.41459$KR1.28318@bignews2.bellsouth.net>:
...
There is evidence that convinces me, it is a pointless waste of time
to try to convince someone who is so filled with that God is
Love!
You are posting in alt.atheism and whining about the fact that people
who respond to you are not Christian. You assert that there is evidence
that convinces you, but you cannot provide a lick of evidence. When
asked about that lack of evidence, you got all high-and-mighty and
started insulting those who would presume to question your unsupported
assertions.
1th - Bill M an atheist, crossposted the initial header to at least
four (4) religious and Christian newsgroups. This is not his first time.
I only responded to the pre-existing NGs already listed.
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
Please learn what evidence means.
Please don't be insulting.
Then don't be a stupid, personally nasty liar.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Wood" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
06 Oct 2006 09:18:35 AM |
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:185ci2hb08vrov772fv9j6e0la063l02b3@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:10:18 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:n8ebi2pi78at6kvrkho56vkbh2grsqur7k@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<gviVg.26747$8s6.7934@bignews4.bellsouth.net>:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:p58bi252sabvr3jq6soparmi55fmlf8kep@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:12:42 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<YbhVg.41459$KR1.28318@bignews2.bellsouth.net>:
...
There is evidence that convinces me, it is a pointless waste of
time
to try to convince someone who is so filled with that God is
Love!
You are posting in alt.atheism and whining about the fact that
people
who respond to you are not Christian. You assert that there is
evidence
that convinces you, but you cannot provide a lick of evidence. When
asked about that lack of evidence, you got all high-and-mighty and
started insulting those who would presume to question your
unsupported
assertions.
1th - Bill M an atheist, crossposted the initial header to at least
four (4) religious and Christian newsgroups. This is not his first
time.
I only responded to the pre-existing NGs already listed.
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
Please learn what evidence means.
Please don't be insulting.
Then don't be a stupid, personally nasty liar.
There is nobody on alt.religion.Christian who is nastier than you!.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill M" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
06 Oct 2006 01:51:55 PM |
|
|
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:_AtVg.18461$vi3.16554@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:185ci2hb08vrov772fv9j6e0la063l02b3@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:10:18 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:n8ebi2pi78at6kvrkho56vkbh2grsqur7k@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<gviVg.26747$8s6.7934@bignews4.bellsouth.net>:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:p58bi252sabvr3jq6soparmi55fmlf8kep@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:12:42 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<YbhVg.41459$KR1.28318@bignews2.bellsouth.net>:
...
There is evidence that convinces me, it is a pointless waste of
time
to try to convince someone who is so filled with that God is
Love!
You are posting in alt.atheism and whining about the fact that
people
who respond to you are not Christian. You assert that there is
evidence
that convinces you, but you cannot provide a lick of evidence. When
asked about that lack of evidence, you got all high-and-mighty and
started insulting those who would presume to question your
unsupported
assertions.
1th - Bill M an atheist, crossposted the initial header to at least
four (4) religious and Christian newsgroups. This is not his first
time.
I only responded to the pre-existing NGs already listed.
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
Please learn what evidence means.
Please don't be insulting.
Then don't be a stupid, personally nasty liar.
There is nobody on alt.religion.Christian who is nastier than you!.
Or more honest and factual!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
06 Oct 2006 08:00:19 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:51:55 -0400, "Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:_AtVg.18461$vi3.16554@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:185ci2hb08vrov772fv9j6e0la063l02b3@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:10:18 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:n8ebi2pi78at6kvrkho56vkbh2grsqur7k@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<gviVg.26747$8s6.7934@bignews4.bellsouth.net>:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:p58bi252sabvr3jq6soparmi55fmlf8kep@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:12:42 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<YbhVg.41459$KR1.28318@bignews2.bellsouth.net>:
...
There is evidence that convinces me, it is a pointless waste of
time
to try to convince someone who is so filled with that God is
Love!
You are posting in alt.atheism and whining about the fact that
people
who respond to you are not Christian. You assert that there is
evidence
that convinces you, but you cannot provide a lick of evidence. When
asked about that lack of evidence, you got all high-and-mighty and
started insulting those who would presume to question your
unsupported
assertions.
1th - Bill M an atheist, crossposted the initial header to at least
four (4) religious and Christian newsgroups. This is not his first
time.
I only responded to the pre-existing NGs already listed.
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
Please learn what evidence means.
Please don't be insulting.
Then don't be a stupid, personally nasty liar.
There is nobody on alt.religion.Christian who is nastier than you!.
Or more honest and factual!
In their fantasy world they think they're telling us the truth about
ourselves because that's what their preachers say about us, so it must
be true.
But they have neither the common sense nor courtesy to grasp that
there is a major dispute between what they tell us our POV is, and
what we say it is.
And instead of granting us the courtesy and respect that we might
actually be telling the truth about ourselves, they insist they know
better than we do, what is in our own minds.
It's arrogant. It's rude. And when they have been repeatedly
corrected, downright nasty.
So many of them do it.
And they have the sheer hypocrisy to accuse us of nastiness when we
treat then as the bigoted, vicious, personal liars and slanderers
they show themselves to be.
And then they further lie, accusing us of name-calling instead of
arguing. When there is nothing to argue about. They were wrong about
us and got corrected.
That's all.
.
|
|
|
| User: "gatekeeper" |
|
| Title: Re: IS THERE A REAL GOD? |
07 Oct 2006 12:35:11 PM |
|
|
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:51:55 -0400, "Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:_AtVg.18461$vi3.16554@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:185ci2hb08vrov772fv9j6e0la063l02b3@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:10:18 -0400, "Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:n8ebi2pi78at6kvrkho56vkbh2grsqur7k@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:50 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<gviVg.26747$8s6.7934@bignews4.bellsouth.net>:
"Free Lunch" <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in message
news:p58bi252sabvr3jq6soparmi55fmlf8kep@4ax.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:12:42 -0400, in alt.atheism
"Dan Wood" <danwood34@gmail.com> wrote in
<YbhVg.41459$KR1.28318@bignews2.bellsouth.net>:
...
There is evidence that convinces me, it is a pointless waste of
time
to try to convince someone who is so filled with that God is
Love!
You are posting in alt.atheism and whining about the fact that
people
who respond to you are not Christian. You assert that there is
evidence
that convinces you, but you cannot provide a lick of evidence. When
asked about that lack of evidence, you got all high-and-mighty and
started insulting those who would presume to question your
unsupported
assertions.
1th - Bill M an atheist, crossposted the initial header to at least
four (4) religious and Christian newsgroups. This is not his first
time.
I only responded to the pre-existing NGs already listed.
2nd - Since I believe it is an exercise in futility to post evidence
for biased, anti-religious types, I see no reason. WHy waste my time?
The evidence is sufficient for me.
Please learn what evidence means.
Please don't be insulting.
Then don't be a stupid, personally nasty liar.
There is nobody on alt.religion.Christian who is nastier than you!.
Or more honest and factual!
In their fantasy world they think they're telling us the truth about
ourselves because that's what their preachers say about us, so it must
be true.
But they have neither the common sense nor courtesy to grasp that
there is a major dispute between what they tell us our POV is, and
what we say it is.
And instead of granting us the courtesy and respect that we might
actually be telling the truth about ourselves, they insist they know
better than we do, what is in our own minds.
It's arrogant. It's rude. And when they have been repeatedly
corrected, downright nasty.
So many of them do it.
And they have the sheer hypocrisy to accuse us of nastiness when we
treat then as the bigoted, vicious, personal liars and slanderers
they show themselves to be.
And then they further lie, accusing us of name-calling instead of
arguing. When there is nothing to argue about. They were wrong about
us and got corrected.
That's all.
Your powers of observation, are slightly biased! I have watched you
bomb into many threads, drop your non-hefty-hefty trash bag of garbage,
and then say, oh-what-a-good-boy-am-I!
Well no, you are not a good boy, and all your protest to the contrary
here will not change the facts! When it is you who are arrogant, rude
and downright nasty! No preacher has told me to say this, or any of
the things that you say I have said! I also expect that others such as
DW, are equally, personally aware, and responding to your tripe! We are
not some sort of robot that is programmed to expose you to the light!
However even if we were robots, and the light we shown, showed your
lack of spirtual integrity, then if you were wise, you would do well to
get your life straight with God. Otherwise you are indeed the fool that
is so blind that you can not even see the light when it is shined in
your eyes. If you say you are not blind, and still say you can not see
the light, then you really are the fool!
Your whinning in this thread, and this particular post, is at best
embarassing to you, and especially those that may at times appear to be
your ally, and at worst, may expose you to their self-destructive
vindictive tongues yourself! I would caution you of being so foolish,
and whinning in public!
I would also though invite you to find out the error of your ways, the
ways of man seem right to him, but leads to death and destruction, but
the Way of God leads to life for evermore! Enter in at the narrow gate
and Li | | | | | | | | | | | |