IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD



 Religions > Atheism > IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Bill M"
Date: 01 Jun 2007 12:46:57 PM
Object: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD
There are hundreds of different god beliefs and thousands of different
religious beliefs.
No god has ever appeared to or spoken to the SIX BILLION 'sane' members of
the human race. No dead father, mother, sibling or friend has ever spoken to
or confirmed their after life to any of the SIX BILLION 'sane' members of
the human race.
No god has ever confirmed it is the real god and that all others are fakes.
Why does any 'real' god permit all these fakes?
Could it be because no gods exist and 'all' gods are nothing more than the
hopes and wishes of man. Could it be that man's frightening fear of the
finality of death causes him to create scenarios of an after life?
.

User: "bob young"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 02 Jun 2007 01:11:01 AM
Bill M wrote:

There are hundreds of different god beliefs and thousands of different
religious beliefs.

No god has ever appeared to or spoken to the SIX BILLION 'sane' members of
the human race. No dead father, mother, sibling or friend has ever spoken to
or confirmed their after life to any of the SIX BILLION 'sane' members of
the human race.

No god has ever confirmed it is the real god and that all others are fakes.
Why does any 'real' god permit all these fakes?

Could it be because no gods exist and 'all' gods are nothing more than the
hopes and wishes of man. Could it be that man's frightening fear of the
finality of death causes him to create scenarios of an after life?

Here are the 'A' gods, just for starters: [if you have the time keep
scrolling]:
[Preface]
"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one
fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other
possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."
[Stephen Roberts]
Aeron War [goddess] Wales War
Aeval [goddess] Love, Magic. Ireland
Ahura Mazda
Agrona [goddesss] Destroyer of life
Achall [goddess]Earth and Nature; unhappiness. Ireland
Achtan [goddess] Hunting and wild animals. Ireland
Allah
Adsullata [goddess]
Aphrodite, Ares, Athena, Apollo, Artemis, Abalim[Judaic] Abba Amona[Judaic]
Abraxis[Judaic]
Adam Beliyya'al'[Judaic] Adam Kadmon[Judaic]
Adonai[Judaic] Adonaiel[Judaic]
Aibell [goddess] Beauty; Arts; Magic
Aille [goddess]Justice. Ireland
Aige [goddess] Demi-animals
Aimend [goddess] Sun and Day. Ireland
Aine [goddess] Love and Sexuality
Ailinn [goddess] Love. Ireland
Aidin [goddess] [Aideen] Love and sexuality. Ireland
Aibheaog [goddess] Fire.
Airmed [goddess] Health and healing; Immortality Ireland
Aide [goddess] Water. Ireland - Wife of the Irish god Enna
Artio [goddess] Hunting and Wild Animals Switzerland
Akatriel-Yah[Judaic] Alitha[Judaic]
Alukah(Arpad Yiddish: Estrie)[Judaic] Anafiel[Judaic]
Angels[Judaic] Archons[Judaic] Asherah(Asherah)[Judaic]
Asmodeus(Asmodaios)[Judaic [goddess] Goodness. Ireland
Abaangui Guarani
Aba-khatun [goddess] Russia
Abaris Greek
Abas Greek
Abassi Nigeria/Africa
Abderus Greek
Abeguwo [goddess] Oceania
Abeona [goddess] Roman
Abere [goddess] Oceania
Ab Kin Xoc Maya
Abnoba [goddess] Celtic
Abraxas Roman
Abuk [goddess] Dinka/Africa
Abundantia [goddess] Roman
Acamas Greek
Acantha [goddess] Greek
Acat Maya
Acaviser [goddess] Roman
Acca [goddess] Roman
Acca Larentia [goddess] Roman
Achall [goddess] Irish
Achelois [goddess] Greek
Achelous Greek
Achilles Greek
Achtan [goddess] Irish
Achtland [goddess] Celtic
Acis Greek
Aclla [goddess] Inca
Acna [goddess] Maya/Mexico
Actaeon Greek
Adad Babylonian
Adamanthea [goddess] Greek
Adamisil Wedo [goddess] Haiti
Adapa Babylonian
Adaro Oceania
Adeona [goddess] Roman
Aditi [goddess] Asian
Adityas Asian
Admeta [goddess] Roman
Admete [goddess] Greek
Admetus Greek
Adonis Greek
Adrammelech Babylonia
Adrastus Greek
Adsagsona [goddess] Celtic
Adu Ogyinae Ashanti/Africa
Aeacus Greek
Aebh [goddess] Celtic
Aed Celtic
Aˇdon [goddess] Greek
Aedos [goddess] Roman
Aega [goddess] Greek
Aegeria [goddess] Roman
Aegeus Greek
Aegina [goddess] Greek
Aegir Norse
Aegis Greek
Aegisthus Greek
Aegyptus Greek
Aello [goddess] Greek Amazon
Aeneas Greek
Aeneas Roman
Aeolus Greek
Aero [goddess] Greek
Aeron Celtic
Aerope [goddess] Greek
Aesculapius Asclepius Greek
Aesir Norse
°s S£dhe Celtic
Aestas [goddess] Roman
Aether Greek
Aethra [goddess] Greek
Aetna [goddess] Roman
Afekan [goddess] Oceania
Agaman Nibo [goddess] Haiti
Agamedes Greek
Agamemnon Greek
Agasaya [goddess] Semite
Agave [goddess] Greek
Agdos [goddess] Asia Minor
Agˇ Dahomey/Africa
Aglaia [goddess] Greek
Aglauros [goddess] Greek
Agni India
Agwe [goddess] Benin/Africa
Agwe [goddess] Haiti
Agweta [goddess] Haiti
Ahat [goddess] Egypt
Ahau Chamahez Maya
Ahau Kin [goddess] Maya
Ah Chuy Kak Maya
Ah Cun Can Maya
Ahemait [goddess] Egypt
Ah Kinchil Maya
Ahmakiq Maya
Ahnt Alis Pok' [goddess] Mexico
Ahnt Kai [goddess] Mexico
Ah Puch Maya
Ahriman Persia
Ahsonnutli Navajo
Ahti [goddess] Egypt
Ah Uaynih [goddess] Haiti
Ah Uaynih [goddess] Guatemala
Ahuic [goddess] Aztec/Mexico
Ahulane Maya
Ahura Mazda Persia
Ahurani [goddess] Persia
Ah Wink-ir Masa [goddess] Guatemala
Ai-ada Turkey
'Aiaru [goddess] Oceania
Aigiarm [goddess] Mongolia
Ainˇ [goddess] Celtic
Ainia [goddess] Greek Amazon
Airmed [goddess] Irish
Ai Tupua'i [goddess] Oceania
Aja [goddess] Babylonia
Aje [goddess] Yoruba/Africa
Aji-Suki-Taka-Hi-Kone Japan
Ajok Africa
Ajtzak AmerIndian
Ajysyt [goddess] Siberia
Aka [goddess] Turkey
Akert-khentet-auset-s [goddess] Egypt
Akewa [goddess] Argentina
Akhet [goddess] Egypt
Akhushtal [goddess] Maya
Akonadi [goddess] Ghana/Africa
Akongo Africa
Akuj Africa
Akusaa [goddess] Egypt
Akycha AmerIndian
Ala [goddess] Ibo/Africa
Alaghom Naom Tzentel [goddess] Maya
Alalahe [goddess] Oceania
Ala Muki [goddess] Oceania
Alator Britain
Alastor Greek
Alberich Norse
Albina [goddess] Roman
Albion Greek
Albunea [goddess] Roman
Alcestis [goddess] Greek
Alcibie [goddess] Greek Amazon
Alcimedes Greek
Alcippe Greek
Alcippe [goddess] Greek Amazon
Alcmaeon Greek
Alcmene [goddess] Greek
Alcyon [goddess] Greek
Alecto [goddess] Greek
Alectrona [goddess] Greek
Alectryon Greek
Alemona [goddess] Roman
Alinga [goddess] Australia
Alkaia [goddess] Greek Amazon
Alkonost [goddess] Russia
Al-Lat [goddess] Arabia
Almoshi [goddess] Russia
Alpan [goddess] Roman
Alphito [goddess] Greek
Altan-Telgey [goddess] Mongol
Altria [goddess] Roman
Alu Babylonia
Alvis Germanic
Ama [goddess] Russia
Amaethon Britain
Amalthea Greek
Amalthea [goddess] Greek
Ama no Uzume [goddess] Japan
Ama-terasu [goddess] Japan
Amatsu Mikaboshi Japan
Amaunet [goddess] Egypt
Amazons Greek
Ambika [goddess] Hindu
Ambrosia Greek
Amelia [goddess] Haiti
Amemet [goddess] Egypt
Ament [goddess] Egypt
Amenti Egypt
Amma [goddess] Norse
Amma Dogon/Africa
Ammavaru [goddess] India
Amit [goddess] Egypt
Ammit [goddess] Egypt
Amn [goddess] Egypt
Amon Egypt
Amor Roman
Amphitrite [goddess] Greek
Amphitryon Greek
Amset Egypt
Amymone [goddess] Greek
An Sumeria
Anagtia [goddess] Roman
Anahita [goddess] Persia
Ananke [goddess] Greek
Anansi West Africa
Ananta Shesha Hindu
Anapel [goddess] Russia
Anath Anat [goddess] Phoenician
Anatha [goddess] Egypt
Anatis [goddess] Egypt
Anatu [goddess] Mesopotamia
Anaxarete [goddess] Greek
Anceta [goddess] Roman
Anchises Greek
Andraste [goddess] Britain
Androgyne Greek
Andromache Greek
Andromache [goddess] Greek Amazon
Andromeda [goddess] Greek
Andromeda [goddess] Greek Amazon
Androphonos Greek
Angerboda [goddess] Scandinavia
Angerona [goddess] Roman
Angina [goddess] Roman
Angita [goddess] Roman
Angitia [goddess] Greek
Angpetu WiAmerIndian
Angus Celtic
Anieros [goddess] Roman
Anima Mundi [goddess] Roman
Anius Greek
Anjea [goddess] Australia
Anka [goddess] Egypt
Ankhtith [goddess] Egypt
Ankt [goddess] Egypt
Anna Perenna [goddess] Etruscan
Annapurna Hindu
Annwn Britain
Antaboga Indonesia
Antaeus Greek
Antaios Egypt
Antandre [goddess] Greek Amazon
Anteros Greek
Anteros Roman
Antevorta [goddess] Roman
Anthat [goddess] Egypt
Antianara [goddess] Greek
Antianara [goddess] Greek Amazon
Antibrote [goddess] Greek Amazon
Anticlea [goddess] Greek
Antigone [goddess] Greek
Antinuous Greek
Antiope [goddess] Greek
Antiope [goddess] Greek Amazon
Anu Babylonian
Anu Celtic
Anubis Egypt
Anuket [goddess] Egypt
Anunitu [goddess] Babylonia
An-Zu [goddess] Assyria
Apate [goddess] Greek
Apep Egypt
Aphareus Greek
Aphrodite [goddess] Greek
Apis Egypt
Apis Egypt
Apollo Greek
Apozanolotl [goddess] Aztec/Mexico
Appiades, The [goddess] Roman
Appias [goddess] Roman
Apsu Babylonian
Apunga [goddess] Abrigine
Arachne [goddess] Greek
Arahuta [goddess] New Zealand
Ararat [goddess] Anatolia
Ardwinna Celtic
Ares Greek
Arete [goddess] Greek
Arethusa [goddess] Greek
Areto [goddess] Greek Amazon
Aretz [goddess] Israel
Argonaut Greek
Argos Greek
Ariadne [goddess] Greek
Arianrhod Wales
Aricia [goddess] Roman
Ariki [goddess] New Zealand
Arinna [goddess] Hittite
Arion Greek
Arnamentia [goddess] Britain
Arne [goddess] Greek
Arohirohi [goddess] New Zealand
Arria [goddess] Roman
Arsino‘ [goddess] Greek
Artemis [goddess] Greek
Artio Celtic
Aruna [goddess] Hindu
Aryong Jong [goddess] Korea
Asase Yaa [goddess] Ghana/Africa
As-ava [goddess] Russia
Ascanius Roman
Asclepius Greek
AsgardNorse
Asgaya Gigagei Cherokee
Asherali [goddess] Canaan
Ashiakle [goddess] Ghana/Africa
Ashnan [goddess] Sumeria
Ashtoreth Phoenician
Ashtoreth [goddess] Egypt
Ashur Assyria
Ashvins Hindu
Askr and Embla Norse
Astarte [goddess] Phoenicia
Asteria [goddess] Greek
Astraea [goddess] Greek
Astraeos Greek
Astrea [goddess] Roman
Asuras Asian
Atalanta [goddess] Greek
Atanea [goddess] South Pacific
Atar [goddess] Iran
Ate [goddess] Greek
At-Em [goddess] Egypt
Aten Aton Egypt
Athena [goddess] Greek
Athirat [goddess] Canaan
Athor [goddess] Egypt
Athtart [goddess] Canaan
Atl Aztec
Atlacamani [goddess] Aztec/Mexico
Atlacoya [goddess] Aztec/Mexico
Atlas Greek
Atlatonin [goddess] Aztec/Mexico
Atreus Greek
Atropos [goddess] Greek
Attis Roman
Atum Egypt
Auchimalgen [goddess] Chile
Au-Co Vietnamese
Audjal [goddess] Caroline Islands
Auilix Maya
Aura [goddess] Greek
Aurita [goddess] Roman
Aurora [goddess] Roman
Ausaitis Lithuania
Austeja Lithuania
Autolycus Greek
Autonoe [goddess] Greek
Auxesia [goddess] Greek
Averna [goddess] Roman
Avernales [goddess] Roman
Averruncus [goddess] Roman
Aversa [goddess] Roman
Awonawilona [goddess] Pueblo/Zuni
Aya [goddess] Mesopotamia
Ayaba [goddess] Dahomey/Africa
Ayauhteotl [goddess] Aztec/Mexico
Ayida [goddess] Haiti
Ayizan [goddess] Haiti
Ayt'ar Russia
Azacca Haiti
Aziri [goddess] Africa
Babaluaye, Bacchus, Baldur, Bast, Bellona, Brahma, Brigid,
Badb [goddess] War: Wild birds; Magic; Water -Ireland
Badba [goddess] War. Ireland
Bainleannan [goddess] Ireland Celtic spirit
Baal[Judaic] Baal-Karmelos[Judaic]
Ban Naomha [goddess] Fishing Ireland
Ban Nighechain [goddess] Water. Scotland
Banba [Bandha] [goddess] Ireland
Banna [goddess] Water; Creativity; Immortality. Ireland
Bat Kol[Judaic] Beelzebub(Beelzebul Baalzebub)[Judaic]
Belial(Beliar)[Judaic]iBethel[ Syrian]
Bansch [goddess] Ireland
Ba[goddess] China
Baal Bel Phoenicia
Ba'Alat[goddess] Phoenicia
Baatsi Africa
Baau[goddess] Phoenicia
Babamik[goddess] Oceania
Baba Yaga[goddess] Slavonic
Bacchantes[goddess] Greek
Bacchus Roman
Bachue[goddess] Chibcha
Backlum Chaam Maya
Badb[goddess] Irish
Bakha Egypt
Balder Norse
Balios Greek
Balor[goddess] Irish
Banba[goddess] Irish
Banka-Mundi[goddess] India
Barghest England
Baron Samedi[goddess] Haiti
Bast or Bastet[goddess] Egypt
Bathkol[goddess] Israel
Baubo[goddess] Greek
Baucis Roman
Bayanni[goddess] Africa
Bebhionn[goddess] Irish
Beelsamin Phoenicia
Befana[goddess] Italy
Begoe[goddess] Roman
Beiwe[goddess] Lappland
.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 02 Jun 2007 05:22:52 AM
bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one
fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other
possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."
[Stephen Roberts]

Stephen Roberts is wrong in his contention. An atheist is someone who does
not believe in any god. If someone believes in even one god then they are
not atheist. There may be something to be said for his appeal to reason in
his last statement here.
--
Midwinter
.
User: "bob young"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 03 Jun 2007 12:26:04 AM
Midwinter wrote:

bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one
fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other
possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."
[Stephen Roberts]


Stephen Roberts is wrong in his contention. An atheist is someone who does
not believe in any god. If someone believes in even one god then they are
not atheist. There may be something to be said for his appeal to reason in
his last statement here.

When you wrote this did it not occur to you how ridiculous it sounds?
So tell me one more time - you believe in your god, but the thousands of
others are just silly made up things? Do I hear you correctly?
Bob
Beliefs are dangerous. Beliefs allow the mind to stop functioning. A
non-functioning mind is clinically dead. Believe in nothing.
[Maynard James Keenan]



--
Midwinter

.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 03 Jun 2007 04:28:55 AM
bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

When you wrote this did it not occur to you how ridiculous it sounds?

So tell me one more time - you believe in your god, but the thousands of
others are just silly made up things? Do I hear you correctly?

If you're asking me *personally*, then the answer is that everything is
part of my 'god'. Atheists and religionists, and all cultures and all
belief systems that there have ever been and ever will be; all part of It.
But if you were to speak in general terms, then I imagine that's exactly
how a believer in one particular god would feel, yes. And no doubt they'll
each have personal reasoning sufficient to support that belief in their own
lives.
--
Midwinter
.
User: "bob young"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 03 Jun 2007 06:11:02 AM
Midwinter wrote:

bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

When you wrote this did it not occur to you how ridiculous it sounds?

So tell me one more time - you believe in your god, but the thousands of
others are just silly made up things? Do I hear you correctly?


If you're asking me *personally*, then the answer is that everything is
part of my 'god'. Atheists and religionists, and all cultures and all
belief systems that there have ever been and ever will be; all part of It.

You are good at creating 'cop outs' too
Either that or your god is highly original and never heard of before. Still
we atheists are adamant that man creates his own gods and then manipulates
them to his heart's content, which you seem to have confirmed.


But if you were to speak in general terms, then I imagine that's exactly
how a believer in one particular god would feel, yes. And no doubt they'll
each have personal reasoning sufficient to support that belief in their own
lives.

--
Midwinter

.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 04 Jun 2007 04:27:09 AM
bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

Either that or your god is highly original and never heard of before.

Oh, there's plenty of people with a similar view to mine, and have been
through history. The thing is that we don't have a single label or a
single name for 'God'. And, of course, we don't parade around the place
demanding conformity.

Still we atheists are adamant that man creates his own gods and then
manipulates them to his heart's content, which you seem to have
confirmed.

Well, there are some philosophers who believe that man created the
universe. From my point of view you appear here to be claiming as much.
Perhaps this is a good illustration of how different two points of view can
be.
--
Midwinter
.
User: "bob young"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 04 Jun 2007 06:25:01 AM
Midwinter wrote:

bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

Either that or your god is highly original and never heard of before.


Oh, there's plenty of people with a similar view to mine, and have been
through history. The thing is that we don't have a single label or a
single name for 'God'. And, of course, we don't parade around the place
demanding conformity.

That is a cop out, you cannot manage to live a life without a god, you
challenge the established ones as you have severe doubts about them so you
replace them with something even more obscure.



Still we atheists are adamant that man creates his own gods and then
manipulates them to his heart's content, which you seem to have
confirmed.


Well, there are some philosophers who believe that man created the
universe. From my point of view you appear here to be claiming as much.

Nonsense nowhere have I said or even intimated such a stupid thing.



Perhaps this is a good illustration of how different two points of view can
be.

No it is an insincere one as you probably already know. But atheists are used
to it, insincerity raises it's nasty head sooner or later, usually when the
religionist has his back firmly up against the wall.



--
Midwinter

.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 04 Jun 2007 10:00:06 AM
bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

That is a cop out, you cannot manage to live a life without a god, you
challenge the established ones as you have severe doubts about them so
you replace them with something even more obscure.

There's nothing obscure about it, bob. As I said, some of the more angry
anti-religionists don't like it much, and often deny it's religion at
all, because they find themselves stumped as to how to disprove something
that clearly exists. So they're left with little more than to argue that
nature is 'just' nature and shouldn't be viewed as anything more
significant than that.

Still we atheists are adamant that man creates his own gods and
then manipulates them to his heart's content, which you seem to
have confirmed.


Well, there are some philosophers who believe that man created the
universe. From my point of view you appear here to be claiming as
much.


Nonsense nowhere have I said or even intimated such a stupid thing.

Weren't you suggesting above that you think I've invented my 'God'? And
since my 'God' equates to everything there is...

Perhaps this is a good illustration of how different two points of
view can be.


No it is an insincere one as you probably already know.

Sure - you disagree with me, therefore I'm being dishonest.
Fact is that I've given you nothing but truthful answers about how I see
things. That you can't bring yourself to tolerate my point of view is
your problem, and isn't anything to do with my being 'dishonest'.

are used to it, insincerity raises it's nasty head sooner or later,
usually when the religionist has his back firmly up against the wall.

bob, bob... You're the one who feels the need to try to disprove my
religious beliefs.
--
Midwinter
.
User: "bob young"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 05 Jun 2007 12:37:02 AM
Midwinter wrote:

bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

That is a cop out, you cannot manage to live a life without a god, you
challenge the established ones as you have severe doubts about them so
you replace them with something even more obscure.


There's nothing obscure about it, bob. As I said, some of the more angry
anti-religionists don't like it much, and often deny it's religion at
all, because they find themselves stumped as to how to disprove something
that clearly exists. So they're left with little more than to argue that
nature is 'just' nature and shouldn't be viewed as anything more
significant than that.

Still we atheists are adamant that man creates his own gods and
then manipulates them to his heart's content, which you seem to
have confirmed.


Well, there are some philosophers who believe that man created the
universe. From my point of view you appear here to be claiming as
much.


Nonsense nowhere have I said or even intimated such a stupid thing.


Weren't you suggesting above that you think I've invented my 'God'? And
since my 'God' equates to everything there is...

Perhaps this is a good illustration of how different two points of
view can be.


No it is an insincere one as you probably already know.


Sure - you disagree with me, therefore I'm being dishonest.

Fact is that I've given you nothing but truthful answers about how I see
things. That you can't bring yourself to tolerate my point of view is
your problem, and isn't anything to do with my being 'dishonest'.

are used to it, insincerity raises it's nasty head sooner or later,
usually when the religionist has his back firmly up against the wall.


bob, bob... You're the one who feels the need to try to disprove my
religious beliefs.

Hey thanks for your time, frankly we have been over all that ground up there
before, we are dancing together round and round in circles.
Cheers
Bob



--
Midwinter

.
User: "Christopher A.Lee"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 05 Jun 2007 07:58:53 AM
On 5 Jun 2007 00:37:02 -0500, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com>
wrote:



Midwinter wrote:

bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

That is a cop out, you cannot manage to live a life without a god, you
challenge the established ones as you have severe doubts about them so
you replace them with something even more obscure.


There's nothing obscure about it, bob. As I said, some of the more angry
anti-religionists don't like it much, and often deny it's religion at
all, because they find themselves stumped as to how to disprove something
that clearly exists. So they're left with little more than to argue that
nature is 'just' nature and shouldn't be viewed as anything more
significant than that.

Still we atheists are adamant that man creates his own gods and
then manipulates them to his heart's content, which you seem to
have confirmed.


Well, there are some philosophers who believe that man created the
universe. From my point of view you appear here to be claiming as
much.


Nonsense nowhere have I said or even intimated such a stupid thing.


Weren't you suggesting above that you think I've invented my 'God'? And
since my 'God' equates to everything there is...

Perhaps this is a good illustration of how different two points of
view can be.


No it is an insincere one as you probably already know.


Sure - you disagree with me, therefore I'm being dishonest.

Fact is that I've given you nothing but truthful answers about how I see
things. That you can't bring yourself to tolerate my point of view is
your problem, and isn't anything to do with my being 'dishonest'.

are used to it, insincerity raises it's nasty head sooner or later,
usually when the religionist has his back firmly up against the wall.


bob, bob... You're the one who feels the need to try to disprove my
religious beliefs.


Hey thanks for your time, frankly we have been over all that ground up there
before, we are dancing together round and round in circles.

If they kept them to themselves, nobody would point out how ridiculous
they are.

Cheers

Bob



--
Midwinter

.








User: "Richo"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 05 Jun 2007 07:48:07 PM
On Jun 2, 8:22 pm, Midwinter <midwinte...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote :

"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one
fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other
possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."
[Stephen Roberts]


Stephen Roberts is wrong in his contention.

Strictly speaking he should have replaced "you will understand" with
"you may understand" - then I think its pretty powerful.
You can imagine being a peasant in 12th century Europe or perhaps
someone growing up in rural India - they would have no idea that there
was more than one conception of God - they would have no idea that
there was an alternative to belief - when everyone around them has
that belief - or at least professes to so believe.
When you read some books about other beliefs or even meet persons from
other cultures then you have a way of seeing your beliefs from an
*outside* perspective - how would someone view my faith who did not
share it?
You *may* - if you are curious and thoughtful - begin to think that
perhaps the universal belief in the divine has its source in human
nature - and once that idea takes hold then you are moving towards the
rejection of religious dogmas - which may lead to rejection of all god
beliefs.
Here is the "contrapositive" version of the Roberts quote:
Imagine that there was only one conception of God - imagine that
cultures separated by vast oceans and mountain ranges and thousands of
years of history and different languages and cultures had all come up
with the same idea of God. That when Europeans invaded the heart of
Africa or the mountains of Papua New Guinea they found a people who
worshiped God and assigned this being the same attributes they did.
Imagine they never found polytheists and animists - but always
monotheists.
Imagine how powerful an argument for the existence of God this would
be!
Now, notice that this is not the actual world we inhabit.
8-)
Do you really think this observation means *nothing at all*?
I think it says a lot.
Cheers, Mark.
.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 02 Jun 2007 11:36:12 PM
On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 05:22:52 -0500, Midwinter
<midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one
fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other
possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."
[Stephen Roberts]


Stephen Roberts is wrong in his contention. An atheist is someone who does
not believe in any god. If someone believes in even one god then they are
not atheist.

Which means that the theist lack belief in thousands (if not more) of
gods (IOW, all the gods that can be believed in minus 1), and the
atheists lacks belief in just one more.
.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 03 Jun 2007 04:25:29 AM
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote :

Stephen Roberts is wrong in his contention. An atheist is someone who
does not believe in any god. If someone believes in even one god then
they are not atheist.


Which means that the theist lack belief in thousands (if not more) of
gods (IOW, all the gods that can be believed in minus 1), and the
atheists lacks belief in just one more.

That's as maybe - and as I said there may be something in his final
statement which tries to convince the religionist WHY the atheist does not
believe (although in many cases I doubt the target religious person would
see the reasoning behind the argument).
But the idea that a religious person is an atheist because there are gods
they don't believe in is fatuous - not to mention a misrepresentation of
the concept of atheism. It's surprising that it's usually atheists -
normally so fiercely protective of the term - who quote this argument.
If a person believes in even one god out of thousands, then they are not an
atheist; and since they are not atheistic it is probably futile to attempt
to show them their own supposed atheism as reason why they should not
believe in that one god either.
--
Midwinter
.
User: "bob young"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 03 Jun 2007 06:08:02 AM
Midwinter wrote:

Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote :

Stephen Roberts is wrong in his contention. An atheist is someone who
does not believe in any god. If someone believes in even one god then
they are not atheist.


Which means that the theist lack belief in thousands (if not more) of
gods (IOW, all the gods that can be believed in minus 1), and the
atheists lacks belief in just one more.


That's as maybe - and as I said there may be something in his final
statement which tries to convince the religionist WHY the atheist does not
believe (although in many cases I doubt the target religious person would
see the reasoning behind the argument).

But the idea that a religious person is an atheist because there are gods
they don't believe in is fatuous - not to mention a misrepresentation of
the concept of atheism. It's surprising that it's usually atheists -
normally so fiercely protective of the term - who quote this argument.

If a person believes in even one god out of thousands, then they are not an
atheist; and since they are not atheistic it is probably futile to attempt
to show them their own supposed atheism as reason why they should not
believe in that one god either.

Would it not be more to the point and less deviational if you were to deal
with the issue of the thousands of religions and gods and clearly state
whether you believe any of them or not and then go on to tell us why you think
your one is different i.e. real and therefore beleivable.
This was, after all, the point of Stephen Roberts claim.
Thanks, but I doubt this will get a 'direct' response
Bob
Humanist Brit.



--
Midwinter

.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 04 Jun 2007 04:13:07 AM
bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

Would it not be more to the point and less deviational if you were to
deal with the issue of the thousands of religions and gods and clearly
state whether you believe any of them or not and then go on to tell us
why you think your one is different i.e. real and therefore
beleivable.

That would certainly get us away from the point I made, yes, and thus
excuse you from answering it. After all, "we're all atheists really"
does seem to be one of the militants' current sacred cows.
In answer to your question, then:
Yes, I'm religious. The reason I believe my 'God' is real is because I'm
standing on it; because I'm breathing it; because I can see it, feel it,
smell it, hear it and taste it. As to what my religion is called, well,
it's somewhere paganism and pantheism, and if you demand more detail than
that then you'll probably be waiting a long time, just as I have. 'God',
as the whole being, equates to the cosmos and everything in it. Nothing
supernatural exists, but there are no doubt things we have not yet
explained so I don't rush to write off what I can't immediately account
for. My 'gods', subordinate to the overall 'God' (which I don't refer to
by that label, as a rule), are personifications of natural phenomena and
processes, and exist because those phenomena and processes exist. Don't
assume that this means I think I can pray to the storm and expect it to
ease off: my gods don't demand prayer, and even if prayer are offered
they don't answer them unless it's their will to do so (but then, it
would've happened anyway, wouldn't it?). They don't demand certain
behaviours from me and what they prohibit me from doing I can't
physically do. They don't threaten me with torture and death for not
doing as I'm told - although if I get in the way of whatever they're
doing they'll squash me without a second thought. They don't promise me
anything if I behave right, except the peace that we might all gain from
knowing we've done the right thing.
I'm usually told at this point by annoyed atheists that that's not
'proper' religion; usually because they're irritated that they can't
disprove it so have to find another means of attack. That's *some*
atheists. Most have the maturity to tolerate someone with a different
perception than their own.
But to me, yes: it's entirely real and entirely believeable. The best
thing about it, though, is that it doesn't require anyone else to believe
it as well. They can take it or leave it: there's no salvation or
damnation except what we furnish for ourselves, so there's no compulsion
to see things in the way I do. And some ask why bother, if really all my
'God' is is nature. From my point of view, nature being as awe-inspiring
as it is, there's no reason for me *not* to see things this way.

This was, after all, the point of Stephen Roberts claim.

It was indeed, as I said. It was also Stephen Roberts' claim that a
religious person is effectively an atheist because there are all these
gods they don't believe in. Which is the claim I actually challenged and
therefore the REAL point of this sub-thread: an atheist is one who does
not have that belief. If someone DOES have that belief, in however many
or few gods, then they are not an atheist. In most cases (although
certainly not all) it is an entirely different mindset.

Thanks, but I doubt this will get a 'direct' response

Oh, of course not.
--
Midwinter
.
User: "bob young"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 04 Jun 2007 06:20:02 AM
Midwinter wrote:

bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

Would it not be more to the point and less deviational if you were to
deal with the issue of the thousands of religions and gods and clearly
state whether you believe any of them or not and then go on to tell us
why you think your one is different i.e. real and therefore
beleivable.


That would certainly get us away from the point I made, yes, and thus
excuse you from answering it. After all, "we're all atheists really"
does seem to be one of the militants' current sacred cows.

In answer to your question, then:

Yes, I'm religious. The reason I believe my 'God' is real is because I'm
standing on it; because I'm breathing it; because I can see it, feel it,
smell it, hear it and taste it.

THAT is plain lunacy and if you don't realize that then you really are in a
bad way.
What does god smell like?
No, the reason you bleeive your god is your mother so taught you and her
mother taught her and so on unmtil we reach right back to the desert dweller
who made the whole thing up in the first place.
This applies not only to oyur relion but to every other religion under the
sun.

As to what my religion is called, well,
it's somewhere paganism and pantheism, and if you demand more detail than
that then you'll probably be waiting a long time, just as I have. 'God',
as the whole being, equates to the cosmos and everything in it. Nothing
supernatural exists, but there are no doubt things we have not yet
explained so I don't rush to write off what I can't immediately account
for. My 'gods', subordinate to the overall 'God' (which I don't refer to
by that label, as a rule), are personifications of natural phenomena and
processes, and exist because those phenomena and processes exist. Don't
assume that this means I think I can pray to the storm and expect it to
ease off: my gods don't demand prayer, and even if prayer are offered
they don't answer them unless it's their will to do so (but then, it
would've happened anyway, wouldn't it?). They don't demand certain
behaviours from me and what they prohibit me from doing I can't
physically do. They don't threaten me with torture and death for not
doing as I'm told - although if I get in the way of whatever they're
doing they'll squash me without a second thought. They don't promise me
anything if I behave right, except the peace that we might all gain from
knowing we've done the right thing.

I'm usually told at this point by annoyed atheists that that's not
'proper' religion; usually because they're irritated that they can't
disprove it so have to find another means of attack. That's *some*
atheists. Most have the maturity to tolerate someone with a different
perception than their own.

But to me, yes: it's entirely real and entirely believeable. The best
thing about it, though, is that it doesn't require anyone else to believe
it as well. They can take it or leave it: there's no salvation or
damnation except what we furnish for ourselves, so there's no compulsion
to see things in the way I do. And some ask why bother, if really all my
'God' is is nature. From my point of view, nature being as awe-inspiring
as it is, there's no reason for me *not* to see things this way.


This was, after all, the point of Stephen Roberts claim.


It was indeed, as I said. It was also Stephen Roberts' claim that a
religious person is effectively an atheist because there are all these
gods they don't believe in. Which is the claim I actually challenged and
therefore the REAL point of this sub-thread: an atheist is one who does
not have that belief. If someone DOES have that belief, in however many
or few gods, then they are not an atheist. In most cases (although
certainly not all) it is an entirely different mindset.

Thanks, but I doubt this will get a 'direct' response


Oh, of course not.

It didn't, what I read, well I did a bit of speed reading, and found it was
a load of hogwash in the main, sentimental superstitious crap.
Sorry to be so rude, but at times one has to be.
I hope in future we can zero in to something a bit more realistic, logical,
tangible and solid.......
Hey - have a good week
bob



--
Midwinter

.
User: "Christopher A.Lee"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 04 Jun 2007 07:23:28 AM
On 4 Jun 2007 06:20:02 -0500, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com>
wrote:



Midwinter wrote:

bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

Would it not be more to the point and less deviational if you were to
deal with the issue of the thousands of religions and gods and clearly
state whether you believe any of them or not and then go on to tell us
why you think your one is different i.e. real and therefore
beleivable.


That would certainly get us away from the point I made, yes, and thus
excuse you from answering it. After all, "we're all atheists really"
does seem to be one of the militants' current sacred cows.

The only reason idiots like Midwinter pretend we're militant atheists
is because we don't put up with the theists imposing their religion
any more, or their bigotry, discrimination, slander, rudeness and
stupidity.

In answer to your question, then:

Yes, I'm religious. The reason I believe my 'God' is real is because I'm
standing on it; because I'm breathing it; because I can see it, feel it,
smell it, hear it and taste it.


THAT is plain lunacy and if you don't realize that then you really are in a
bad way.
What does god smell like?

That's an example of what I was talking about. We wouldn't care what
he believes as long as he kept it to himself.

No, the reason you bleeive your god is your mother so taught you and her
mother taught her and so on unmtil we reach right back to the desert dweller
who made the whole thing up in the first place.

This applies not only to oyur relion but to every other religion under the
sun.

As to what my religion is called, well,
it's somewhere paganism and pantheism, and if you demand more detail than
that then you'll probably be waiting a long time, just as I have. 'God',
as the whole being, equates to the cosmos and everything in it. Nothing
supernatural exists, but there are no doubt things we have not yet
explained so I don't rush to write off what I can't immediately account
for. My 'gods', subordinate to the overall 'God' (which I don't refer to
by that label, as a rule), are personifications of natural phenomena and
processes, and exist because those phenomena and processes exist. Don't
assume that this means I think I can pray to the storm and expect it to
ease off: my gods don't demand prayer, and even if prayer are offered
they don't answer them unless it's their will to do so (but then, it
would've happened anyway, wouldn't it?). They don't demand certain
behaviours from me and what they prohibit me from doing I can't
physically do. They don't threaten me with torture and death for not
doing as I'm told - although if I get in the way of whatever they're
doing they'll squash me without a second thought. They don't promise me
anything if I behave right, except the peace that we might all gain from
knowing we've done the right thing.

Do we actually care as long as he has the sense to keep it to himself?

I'm usually told at this point by annoyed atheists that that's not
'proper' religion; usually because they're irritated that they can't
disprove it so have to find another means of attack. That's *some*
atheists. Most have the maturity to tolerate someone with a different
perception than their own.

And they wonder why they get treated as the liars they show themselves
to be, for nastily amateur psychologising his own falsehoods about us
to come up with something nastier and worse, by inventing "reasons"
and "motivations" that aren't there rather than address the actual
reason.
Like most theists, he imagines he gets a free ride and we are supposed
to be deferent when he talks *****.

But to me, yes: it's entirely real and entirely believeable. The best
thing about it, though, is that it doesn't require anyone else to believe
it as well. They can take it or leave it: there's no salvation or
damnation except what we furnish for ourselves, so there's no compulsion
to see things in the way I do. And some ask why bother, if really all my
'God' is is nature. From my point of view, nature being as awe-inspiring
as it is, there's no reason for me *not* to see things this way.

That's his problem. It ain't believable to the rest of us. Nor are his
rationalisations. But if he had the sense to keep it to himself
instead of talking about where it is irrelevant, nobody would know.

This was, after all, the point of Stephen Roberts claim.


It was indeed, as I said. It was also Stephen Roberts' claim that a
religious person is effectively an atheist because there are all these
gods they don't believe in. Which is the claim I actually challenged and
therefore the REAL point of this sub-thread: an atheist is one who does
not have that belief. If someone DOES have that belief, in however many
or few gods, then they are not an atheist. In most cases (although
certainly not all) it is an entirely different mindset.

Yet his belief is exactly the same for all the other gods.

Thanks, but I doubt this will get a 'direct' response


Oh, of course not.


It didn't, what I read, well I did a bit of speed reading, and found it was
a load of hogwash in the main, sentimental superstitious crap.

Yep.

Sorry to be so rude, but at times one has to be.

Then don't whine at the responses. One person being rude to a whole
slew of others generates a whole slew of responses from people who
don't have to put up with it.

I hope in future we can zero in to something a bit more realistic, logical,
tangible and solid.......

Hey - have a good week

bob



--
Midwinter

.

User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 04 Jun 2007 09:34:03 AM
bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

THAT is plain lunacy and if you don't realize that then you really are
in a bad way.

I doubt you'd be willing to see any form of religious belief - or any point
of view other than your own - in any other way; even were you able to.

What does god smell like?

Everything.

No, the reason you bleeive your god is your mother so taught you and
her mother taught her and so on

I was raised Christian by my parents. My grandparents were also Christian.
My great-grandparents were Christian too.
So your claim here is nothing more than the product of your prejudice.
Nevertheless, you asked for a direct answer and, despite your denials, you
got one. What you think of that answer is irrelevant.

Thanks, but I doubt this will get a 'direct' response


Oh, of course not.


It didn't, what I read, well I did a bit of speed reading, and found
it was a load of hogwash in the main, sentimental superstitious crap.

Well, speed-read or not, you got an answer, bob. It was an answer you
didn't like, but in truth we both knew from the start that that was
inevitable. You weren't *really* asking for an answer, because nobody's
opinion matters bar your own. You were just making a big show out of the
fact that you didn't expect a direct answer. Nevertheless, you got one.
But what's of significance here is that, like so many angry anti-
religionists, you can't seem to get your head around the idea of a religion
that isn't Christianity.

Sorry to be so rude, but at times one has to be.

Your 'rudeness' is of no consequence to me. But you might consider being
honest enough not to pretend regret for something you so obviously enjoy;
or to waste your efforts trying to feign concern for the feelings of those
you so openly hate.

I hope in future we can zero in to something a bit more realistic,
logical, tangible and solid.......

I very much doubt you hold to any such hope. Your intentions here are
well-established.
--
Midwinter
.
User: "bob young"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 05 Jun 2007 12:15:01 AM
Midwinter wrote:

bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

THAT is plain lunacy and if you don't realize that then you really are
in a bad way.


I doubt you'd be willing to see any form of religious belief -

Corrrrrect. I am an atheist and my mind is clear on one point - humans love
to make up gods, makes 'em feel better

or any point
of view other than your own - in any other way; even were you able to.

Show me proof of a god and i am willing to change my point of view at any
time.
I have learned a lot in my 77 years and much of it came from other humans.
Just like your god



What does god smell like?


Everything.

This is a rious subject - you claimed you could smell your god.
[I smell a rat]




No, the reason you bleeive your god is your mother so taught you and
her mother taught her and so on


I was raised Christian by my parents. My grandparents were also Christian.
My great-grandparents were Christian too.

So your claim here is nothing more than the product of your prejudice.

Nope- it is downright common sense. Any Hindu can say the same. Who's
parents were right?



Nevertheless, you asked for a direct answer and, despite your denials, you
got one. What you think of that answer is irrelevant.

Thanks, but I doubt this will get a 'direct' response


Oh, of course not.


It didn't, what I read, well I did a bit of speed reading, and found
it was a load of hogwash in the main, sentimental superstitious crap.


Well, speed-read or not, you got an answer, bob. It was an answer you
didn't like,

I don't like gibberish - which is what it was, obscure verbiage of the type so
oftern used by religionists it is like laying a false trail

but in truth we both knew from the start that that was
inevitable. You weren't *really* asking for an answer, because nobody's
opinion matters bar your own. You were just making a big show out of the
fact that you didn't expect a direct answer. Nevertheless, you got one.

But what's of significance here is that, like so many angry anti-
religionists, you can't seem to get your head around the idea of a religion
that isn't Christianity.

Number 1 - I am not angry, [but you seem to be]. Number 2 I reject all
religions, Christianity included and it is the one i know more about since I,
like you was brought up in it, but me, [unlike you], had the sense to opt out.



Sorry to be so rude, but at times one has to be.


Your 'rudeness' is of no consequence to me. But you might consider being
honest enough not to pretend regret for something you so obviously enjoy;
or to waste your efforts trying to feign concern for the feelings of those
you so openly hate.

I only hate te religinists who bomb each other, the rest i just feel sorry
for.



I hope in future we can zero in to something a bit more realistic,
logical, tangible and solid.......


I very much doubt you hold to any such hope. Your intentions here are
well-established.

Corrrrect, to talk sense into the brainwashed.......
Hope you are otherwise having a good week
Bob
"The atheist does not say "there is no God," he says "I know not what you mean
by God; I am without idea of God; the word 'God' is to me a sound conveying no
clear or distinct affirmation. ... The Bible God I deny; the Christian God I
disbelieve in; but I am not rash enough to say there is no God as long as you
tell me you are unprepared to define God to me.""
[Charles Bradlaugh, "Plea for Atheism"]



--
Midwinter

.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 05 Jun 2007 06:20:41 AM
bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

I doubt you'd be willing to see any form of religious belief -


Corrrrrect. I am an atheist and my mind is clear on one point -
humans love to make up gods, makes 'em feel better

[...]

Show me proof of a god and i am willing to change my point of view at
any time.

No, I'm not sure you would be. What would you accept as 'proof'? A
flashy appearance by the deity in question? No, you'd just write it off
as trickery or a scam precisely BECAUSE you're an atheist. Now, I'm not
intending to sound as though I'm suggesting that's a bad thing - it's
your choice, or your nature, and you're free to follow your own path.
But it suggests - and in particular, your outright hostility towards
religion and contempt for those who are religious suggests - that you'd
reject anything that contradicted your established view.
So what would be proof, anyway? To know what proof to expect you'd need
to know what god you're looking for. I have proof of my god because it's
under my feet with every step I take, and it's around me all the time.
But because you reject that very concept of 'God', and consider nature
'just nature' - as though it's something dull and mundane and should be
taken for granted - you will automatically reject everything I could
possibly say or show you that might explain why I see things the way I
do. In other words, you've already reached the only opinion you're
willing, or perhaps able, to allow yourself.

I have learned a lot in my 77 years and much of it came from other
humans. Just like your god

....he threw in as a hopeful afterthought. This despite my having
explained to you that my religious beliefs are my own, and sprang from my
own contemplation of the world around me and from my own value
judgements. This also despite my having explained to you that the people
around me - my family and those of my friends who are religious - are
predominantly Christian, a religion I was raised in and have now moved
away from.
Virtually everything I have learned has come from other humans. And
since humans are part of nature and therefore part of 'God'...
(Your age, incidentally, is irrelevant. There is a range of
intelligence, morality and wisdom amongst 77-year-olds as much as there
is within any other age group.)

This is a rious subject - you claimed you could smell your god.
[I smell a rat]

The rat you smell is part of 'God'.
By the way, what does 'rious' mean?

No, the reason you bleeive your god is your mother so taught you
and her mother taught her and so on


I was raised Christian by my parents. My grandparents were also
Christian. My great-grandparents were Christian too.

So your claim here is nothing more than the product of your
prejudice.


Nope- it is downright common sense. Any Hindu can say the same.
Who's parents were right?

No idea. If I thought the religion of my parents was right, I'd share
it. But I don't. That's my point. I'm not Hindu, so presumably I don't
think they're right, either. Although that said, they're all entitled to
go with what seems right to them, so long as they don't do any harm to
anyone.
But still we're left with your apparent determination that I can only
possibly follow the religion in which I was raised.

I don't like gibberish - which is what it was, obscure verbiage of the
type so oftern used by religionists it is like laying a false trail

Because it was an explanation of my beliefs, and because those beliefs
aren't acceptable to you, it was inevitably going be gibberish as far as
you're concerned. As I said, what you THOUGHT about what I said is
irrelevant. The fact is that you asked for an answer and you got one.
That it wasn't an answer you approved of is of no consequence.

Number 1 - I am not angry, [but you seem to be].

No, not really. I'm actually spending quite a lot more time talking to
you than I probably would if I was angry.

Number 2 I reject
all religions, Christianity included and it is the one i know more
about since I, like you was brought up in it, but me, [unlike you],
had the sense to opt out.

And here is your clearest indication yet that you're not willing to read
what's in front of you. You say I haven't had the sense to opt out of
Christianity, despite my clear statement that I did, and many years ago
at that. Granted, I didn't opt out of religion entirely, as you did, and
no doubt you'll tell me that that's what you meant. Even so, the bulk of
your comments and challenges seem to revolve around the idea that I
follow a monotheistic religion akin to Christianity because I'm
inevitably, according to you, bound to follow the religion of my parents.

I only hate te religinists who bomb each other, the rest i just feel
sorry for.

Mmm. Ostentatiously so.

I hope in future we can zero in to something a bit more realistic,
logical, tangible and solid.......


I very much doubt you hold to any such hope. Your intentions here
are well-established.


Corrrrect, to talk sense into the brainwashed.......

We both know you're not here to 'talk sense' into anyone, so I don't see
why you feel the need to pretend. It strikes me that you're here to
indulge your sense of intellectual superiority - just as some of the
religious types want to indulge theirs with lectures about righteousness.
If you really wanted to 'talk sense', you'd need to argue people round
with reason; and to do that, you first need to understand what they
believe and why they believe it. Note that there's a big difference
between understanding why someone believes something and approving of
what they believe. Some anti-religionists are reluctant to get close
enough to the subject to seek such understanding because they fear that
doing so would either indicate some kind of weakness, or because they're
worried that they might be somehow contaminated by the beliefs they're
trying to argue against.
But Sun Tzu was right. You should know your enemy if you want to be
victorious. You need at least to know where the beliefs you're arguing
against are rooted, and you need to persuade people to question that
foundation. Otherwise you're just shouting in the wind. I mean, look at
the assumptions you've made about me: wildly inaccurate, but they tell
you all you need to know, right? But the trouble is, I've no reason to
accept your repeated assertion that religion is stupid because you've
shown that you don't know - and furthermore, you don't care - what I
believe. So why is your mindless sledgehammer approach more worthy of my
attention than the similar approaches of those fundie Christians
demanding that I submit to *their* will?
--
Midwinter
.
User: "bob young"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 06 Jun 2007 12:33:02 AM
Hi M.W. nice to see yo have the patience to carry on!........
Midwinter wrote:

bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote :

I doubt you'd be willing to see any form of religious belief -


Corrrrrect. I am an atheist and my mind is clear on one point -
humans love to make up gods, makes 'em feel better


[...]

Show me proof of a god and i am willing to change my point of view at
any time.


No, I'm not sure you would be.

Sorry, that cop out no longer holds, I AM VERY INTERESTED as I view life in
a common sense way so proof of a god would be useful to me

What would you accept as 'proof'?

Try Me

A
flashy appearance by the deity in question?

OK for starters. He was supposed to have put in appearances two thousand
plus years ago WHY NOT NOW?

No, you'd just write it off
as trickery or a scam precisely BECAUSE you're an atheist.

Lunacy. If a god appeared out of nowhere and did a miracle or two I would
fall on my feet in front of it and say "I have been wrong all along" so try
me

Now, I'm not
intending to sound as though I'm suggesting that's a bad thing - it's
your choice, or your nature, and you're free to follow your own path.
But it suggests - and in particular, your outright hostility towards
religion and contempt for those who are religious suggests - that you'd
reject anything that contradicted your established view.

Which is another way of saying "Sorry, I have no proof, but rather than so
admit I will throw in diversionary tactics" Is there no shame?!


So what would be proof, anyway? To know what proof to expect you'd need
to know what god you're looking for.

ROFL. more squirming. So inspite of all the variables and 'impossibles'
you threw out earlier you still follow this god and believe in it. BASED
ON WHAT? I'll tell you, based 100% on what other humans have told you -
period.

I have proof of my god because it's
under my feet with every step I take, and it's around me all the time.

yea yea


But because you reject that very concept of 'God', and consider nature
'just nature' - as though it's something dull and mundane and should be
taken for granted - you will automatically reject everything I could
possibly say or show you that might explain why I see things the way I
do. In other words, you've already reached the only opinion you're
willing, or perhaps able, to allow yourself.

So nature to you isn't dull because of that god you have just shown to be
nebulous !
GROAN



I have learned a lot in my 77 years and much of it came from other
humans. Just like your god


...he threw in as a hopeful afterthought. This despite my having
explained to you that my religious beliefs are my own, and sprang from my
own contemplation of the world around me and from my own value
judgements. This also despite my having explained to you that the people
around me - my family and those of my friends who are religious - are
predominantly Christian, a religion I was raised in and have now moved
away from.

Virtually everything I have learned has come from other humans. And
since humans are part of nature and therefore part of 'God'...

Not proven, other than human made gods up, which is nothing but superstition



(Your age, incidentally, is irrelevant. There is a range of
intelligence, morality and wisdom amongst 77-year-olds as much as there
is within any other age group.)

This is a rious subject - you claimed you could smell your god.
[I smell a rat]


The rat you smell is part of 'God'.

By the way, what does 'rious' mean?

It was a typo for 'serious'



No, the reason you bleeive your god is your mother so taught you
and her mother taught her and so on


I was raised Christian by my parents. My grandparents were also
Christian. My great-grandparents were Christian too.

So your claim here is nothing more than the product of your
prejudice.


Nope- it is downright common sense. Any Hindu can say the same.
Who's parents were right?


No idea. If I thought the religion of my parents was right, I'd share
it. But I don't. That's my point. I'm not Hindu, so presumably I don't
think they're right, either. Although that said, they're all entitled to
go with what seems right to them, so long as they don't do any harm to
anyone.

No but those Hindus will say exactly the same about you.
1-1 = 0



But still we're left with your apparent determination that I can only
possibly follow the religion in which I was raised.


I don't like gibberish - which is what it was, obscure verbiage of the
type so oftern used by religionists it is like laying a false trail


Because it was an explanation of my beliefs, and because those beliefs
aren't acceptable to you, it was inevitably going be gibberish as far as
you're concerned. As I said, what you THOUGHT about what I said is
irrelevant. The fact is that you asked for an answer and you got one.
That it wasn't an answer you approved of is of no consequence.


Number 1 - I am not angry, [but you seem to be].


No, not really. I'm actually spending quite a lot more time talking to
you than I probably would if I was angry.

Number 2 I reject
all religions, Christianity included and it is the one i know more
about since I, like you was brought up in it, but me, [unlike you],
had the sense to opt out.


And here is your clearest indication yet that you're not willing to read
what's in front of you. You say I haven't had the sense to opt out of
Christianity, despite my clear statement that I did, and many years ago
at that.

I told you before I had about eighteen years of Christianity and I chose not
to continue

Granted, I didn't opt out of religion entirely, as you did, and
no doubt you'll tell me that that's what you meant. Even so, the bulk of
your comments and challenges seem to revolve around the idea that I
follow a monotheistic religion akin to Christianity because I'm
inevitably, according to you, bound to follow the religion of my parents.

I only hate te religinists who bomb each other, the rest i just feel
sorry for.


Mmm. Ostentatiously so.


I hope in future we can zero in to something a bit more realistic,
logical, tangible and solid.......


I very much doubt you hold to any such hope. Your intentions here
are well-established.


Corrrrect, to talk sense into the brainwashed.......


We both know you're not here to 'talk sense' into anyone, so I don't see
why you feel the need to pretend. It strikes me that you're here to
indulge your sense of intellectual superiority - just as some of the
religious types want to indulge theirs with lectures about righteousness.

If you really wanted to 'talk sense',

I would agree entirely with you - i know ......i know

you'd need to argue people round
with reason; and to do that, you first need to understand what they
believe and why they believe it. Note that there's a big difference
between understanding why someone believes something and approving of
what they believe. Some anti-religionists are reluctant to get close
enough to the subject to seek such understanding because they fear that
doing so would either indicate some kind of weakness, or because they're
worried that they might be somehow contaminated by the beliefs they're
trying to argue against.

But Sun Tzu was right. You should know your enemy if you want to be
victorious. You need at least to know where the beliefs you're arguing
against are rooted, and you need to persuade people to question that
foundation. Otherwise you're just shouting in the wind. I mean, look at
the assumptions you've made about me: wildly inaccurate, but they tell
you all you need to know, right? But the trouble is, I've no reason to
accept your repeated assertion that religion is stupid because you've
shown that you don't know - and furthermore, you don't care - what I
believe. So why is your mindless sledgehammer approach more worthy of my
attention than the similar approaches of those fundie Christians
demanding that I submit to *their* will?

Well it's because humans are basically arrogant, each one thinks he/she is
the centre of the world and is therefore right. There is hope for those who
view the world without wearing blinkers though, as is the case with most
atheists.
Cheers
Bob



--
Midwinter

.

User: ""

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 05 Jun 2007 01:08:29 PM
On 5 Jun., 13:20, Midwinter <midwinte...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote :

I doubt you'd be willing to see any form of religious belief -


Corrrrrect. I am an atheist and my mind is clear on one point -
humans love to make up gods, makes 'em feel better


[...]

Show me proof of a god and i am willing to change my point of view at
any time.


No, I'm not sure you would be. What would you accept as 'proof'? A
flashy appearance by the deity in question? No, you'd just write it off
as trickery or a scam precisely BECAUSE you're an atheist.

Read minds do you?

Now, I'm not
intending to sound as though I'm suggesting that's a bad thing - it's
your choice, or your nature, and you're free to follow your own path.
But it suggests - and in particular, your outright hostility towards
religion and contempt for those who are religious suggests - that you'd
reject anything that contradicted your established view.

So what would be proof, anyway? To know what proof to expect you'd need
to know what god you're looking for. I have proof of my god because it's
under my feet with every step I take,

On the other hand you have no objective evidence to offer.>

and it's around me all the time.
But because you reject that very concept of 'God', and consider nature
'just nature' - as though it's something dull and mundane and should be
taken for granted - you will automatically reject everything I could
possibly say or show you that might explain why I see things the way I
do. In other words, you've already reached the only opinion you're
willing, or perhaps able, to allow yourself.

In other words you have no evidence.


I have learned a lot in my 77 years and much of it came from other
humans. Just like your god


...he threw in as a hopeful afterthought. This despite my having
explained to you that my religious beliefs are my own, and sprang from my
own contemplation of the world around me and from my own value
judgements. This also despite my having explained to you that the people
around me - my family and those of my friends who are religious - are
predominantly Christian, a religion I was raised in and have now moved
away from.

You are still using the standard arguments such as "the evidence is
all around us", and "even if you were shown evidence you would reject
it".
snip
.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 05 Jun 2007 06:32:38 PM
wrote :

Read minds do you?

No - it's an assumption based on this conversation and my previous
experience talking with bob. If he wants to dispute any of those
assumptions then he's welcome to do it for himself.

So what would be proof, anyway? To know what proof to expect you'd
need to know what god you're looking for. I have proof of my god
because it's under my feet with every step I take,


On the other hand you have no objective evidence to offer.>

Right. Which is why I wouldn't expect you to follow the religion I
follow, or see the world in the way I see it.
And that's why I don't treat you with contempt for making your own
judgements in this regard.

In other words you have no evidence.

I have the evidence I need to persuade me - and what need have I to
persuade anyone else?

You are still using the standard arguments such as "the evidence is
all around us", and "even if you were shown evidence you would reject
it".

No, I must correct you. I said that the evidence for my beliefs is all
around ME. Sure, *I* see it all around everyone else, but they're going
to see it differently, or might not see it at all. That's what
individuality is all about. The difference is that I don't see that
individuality as reason to treat them like dirt.
bob's demand was that I "deal with the issue of the thousands of
religions and gods and clearly state whether you believe any of them or
not and then go on to tell us why you think your one is different i.e.
real and therefore beleivable."
I answered the demand he made, but he had trouble with the concept of
'God' as I explained it to him, because he seems determined that I'm
Christian. As I said earlier, this is a common hangup in the anti-
religionists I meet on here. But I haven't once said, nor would I, that
because I believe so must he. His beliefs or lack thereof are his
business, not mine.
--
Midwinter
.
User: ""

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 06 Jun 2007 02:34:59 AM
On 6 Jun., 01:32, Midwinter <midwinte...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

gudl...@yahoo.com wrote :

Read minds do you?


No - it's an assumption based on this conversation and my previous
experience talking with bob. If he wants to dispute any of those
assumptions then he's welcome to do it for himself.

Or you could drop the standard theist excuse for lack of evidence,
i.e. attack the person asking for it.


So what would be proof, anyway? To know what proof to expect you'd
need to know what god you're looking for. I have proof of my god
because it's under my feet with every step I take,


On the other hand you have no objective evidence to offer.>


Right. Which is why I wouldn't expect you to follow the religion I
follow, or see the world in the way I see it.

And that's why I don't treat you with contempt for making your own
judgements in this regard.

In other words you have no evidence.


I have the evidence I need to persuade me - and what need have I to
persuade anyone else?

You, in fact, have no evidence. I seriously doubt that you would
consider subjective feelings as evidence in other situations.


You are still using the standard arguments such as "the evidence is
all around us", and "even if you were shown evidence you would reject
it".


No, I must correct you. I said that the evidence for my beliefs is all
around ME. Sure, *I* see it all around everyone else, but they're going
to see it differently, or might not see it at all. That's what
individuality is all about. The difference is that I don't see that
individuality as reason to treat them like dirt.

You have a right to be treated properly. You have no right to have
your beliefs treated with respect or to be free from criticism or even
scorn.


bob's demand was that I "deal with the issue of the thousands of
religions and gods and clearly state whether you believe any of them or
not and then go on to tell us why you think your one is different i.e.
real and therefore beleivable."

I answered the demand he made, but he had trouble with the concept of
'God' as I explained it to him, because he seems determined that I'm
Christian. As I said earlier, this is a common hangup in the anti-
religionists I meet on here. But I haven't once said, nor would I, that
because I believe so must he. His beliefs or lack thereof are his
business, not mine.

It really makes no difference whether you are a Christian or not.
Your beleifs are just as irrational and unsupported by reality as
those of any fundamentalist Christian or other kind of
fundamentalist. If you express those beliefs publicly, you have no
right to not have that pointed out.
.







User: ""

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 05 Jun 2007 12:30:04 PM
On 4 Jun., 11:13, Midwinter <midwinte...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

bob young <alaspect...@netvigator.com> wrote :

Would it not be more to the point and less deviational if you were to
deal with the issue of the thousands of religions and gods and clearly
state whether you believe any of them or not and then go on to tell us
why you think your one is different i.e. real and therefore
beleivable.


That would certainly get us away from the point I made, yes, and thus
excuse you from answering it. After all, "we're all atheists really"
does seem to be one of the militants' current sacred cows.

That is not the point at all, which is that atheists do not believe in
any god for the same reason that theists disbelieve in the ones they
do not believe in. Nobody is seriously saying that we are all
atheists. It just might get some theist to apply the same standards
to his god as he does to the ones he doesn't believe in.
Unfortunately the defense mechanisms of most if not all theists
prevents them from grasping what is being said.


In answer to your question, then:

Yes, I'm religious. The reason I believe my 'God' is real is because I'm
standing on it; because I'm breathing it; because I can see it, feel it,
smell it, hear it and taste it. As to what my religion is called, well,
it's somewhere paganism and pantheism, and if you demand more detail than
that then you'll probably be waiting a long time, just as I have. 'God',
as the whole being, equates to the cosmos and everything in it. Nothing
supernatural exists, but there are no doubt things we have not yet
explained so I don't rush to write off what I can't immediately account
for. My 'gods', subordinate to the overall 'God' (which I don't refer to
by that label, as a rule), are personifications of natural phenomena and
processes, and exist because those phenomena and processes exist. Don't
assume that this means I think I can pray to the storm and expect it to
ease off: my gods don't demand prayer, and even if prayer are offered
they don't answer them unless it's their will to do so (but then, it
would've happened anyway, wouldn't it?). They don't demand certain
behaviours from me and what they prohibit me from doing I can't
physically do. They don't threaten me with torture and death for not
doing as I'm told - although if I get in the way of whatever they're
doing they'll squash me without a second thought. They don't promise me
anything if I behave right, except the peace that we might all gain from
knowing we've done the right thing.

I'm usually told at this point by annoyed atheists that that's not
'proper' religion; usually because they're irritated that they can't
disprove it so have to find another means of attack. That's *some*
atheists. Most have the maturity to tolerate someone with a different
perception than their own.

But to me, yes: it's entirely real and entirely believeable. The best
thing about it, though, is that it doesn't require anyone else to believe
it as well. They can take it or leave it: there's no salvation or
damnation except what we furnish for ourselves, so there's no compulsion
to see things in the way I do. And some ask why bother, if really all my
'God' is is nature. From my point of view, nature being as awe-inspiring
as it is, there's no reason for me *not* to see things this way.

This was, after all, the point of Stephen Roberts claim.


It was indeed, as I said. It was also Stephen Roberts' claim that a
religious person is effectively an atheist because there are all these
gods they don't believe in. Which is the claim I actually challenged and
therefore the REAL point of this sub-thread: an atheist is one who does
not have that belief. If someone DOES have that belief, in however many
or few gods, then they are not an atheist. In most cases (although
certainly not all) it is an entirely different mindset.

Thanks, but I doubt this will get a 'direct' response


Oh, of course not.

--
Midwinter

.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: IS THERE ANY ' REAL' GOD 05 Jun 2007 06:24:43 PM
wrote :

That is not the point at all,