| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"jackkincaid" |
| Date: |
20 Jan 2005 12:16:43 PM |
| Object: |
Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
Ian Bailey wrote:
Here's something I don't understand about the modern Left's current
infatuation with Islam:
Infatuation? Are lefties converting to Islam en masse and taking the
annual pilgrimage to the hajj?
Ken Livingstone is trying to defend his decision to invite and
'honour' a Muslim cleric whose opinions are barely distinguishable
from Charles Manson's to London by accusing his accusers of, among
other things, 'working for Mossad'; if Zaqarawi were a Christian, Jew,
Hindu or Sikh, Livingstone would never have invited him anywhere.
George Gaslloway has set up a political party specifically intended to
inculcate 'respect' for Islam; in it he has been joined by Ken Loach,
Tariq Ali and the late Paul Foot, all self-confessed 'atheists'.
The Guardian and Independent regularly publish articles in praise of
Islam, written in the former case by associates of terrorists, in the
latter by bin Laden's favourite 'western' reptile, Robert Fisk.
I could go on... Of all the politicians and journalists and other
public figures broadly on the Left (ie generally judged to be to the
left of the UK government), I can think of only a handful (Dinsmore
MP, Nick Cohen, Chris Hitchens, Polly Toynbee, a couple of writers)
who are *not* either falling over one another to make public their
'respect' for Islam, or else are staying very, very quiet on the
subject.
The Left is either infatuated, or deeply frightened.
Or is "infatuation" just that they're not blindly condemoning Islam and
all muslims like you think they should?
Nobody should 'blindly' do anything (unless they're blind, obviously),
though you are here. I spent a long time explaining my case in that
post. I do not condemn Muslims at all, not one little bit, unless they
*do* something condemnatory, and of course that would apply to
everyone else.
I don't actually condemn Islam either; I revile it. I pretty much
dislike all religions, but I especially loathe book-based
fundamentalist religions, which demand a person's entire sense of
loyalty, which shoud be preserved for his nation, and sense of self,
which should be inviolate, and of which Islam is about the worst.
And the hypocrisy of those who denigrate and ridicule Christianity, or
Judaism or Hinduism, but never ever have a bad word to say about
Islam, frankly disgust me - especially given the slaughter currently
being carried out worldwide in Islam's name. They are cowards and
hypocrites.
I don't want to victimise Muslims - far from it; I want to save them
from further victimisation by the 'guardians' of their creed, and the
likes of Livingstone who will forever associate them with fascists
like Qaradawi in the UK public's mind - but I want their religion, its
history, the things for which it stands, discussed openly and
candidly, from a secular perspective, as every other religion may be.
Why is this so frightening? You aren't a Muslim; unless I miss my
guess, you wouldn't convert to Islam in a million years. Therefore you
have made a judgement that Islam is an inferior way of thinking, of
being, for you; you are, in the true sense of the word, an
Islamaphobe, as are we all unless we are Muslims. In which case, why
are you so scared of announcing it? Why are you so frightened of
giving offence to followers of this religious ideology (this bubndle
of half baked abstract dead ideas) when I doubt you'd think twice
about condemning or criticising, or at least talking about, any other
(bundle of equally silly and dead ideas)?
I want the truth, and a level playing field of debate; and I want an
end to hypocrisy of the Left, whose history is bound up with revolt
against the arbitary power of religios hierarchies but who, when faced
with a religious hierarchy whose skin colour is slightly darker than
theirs, shrugs, and assumes the 'wogs' are too stupid to be free.
.
|
|
| User: "Siegfreed" |
|
| Title: Islam and multi-barbarianism |
23 Jan 2005 11:04:35 PM |
|
|
Islam does not fit into a "multicultural" society. It may fit into a
multi-barbarian society for sure.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank F. Matthews" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multi-barbarianism |
24 Jan 2005 12:26:03 PM |
|
|
Siegfreed wrote:
Islam does not fit into a "multicultural" society. It may fit into a
multi-barbarian society for sure.
Actually both Islam & Christianity can be reasonably described as
multi-cultural but mono religious societies. In each case cultural
considerations are far inferior to those of religion.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "hummingbird" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 12:06:15 PM |
|
|
On 20 Jan 2005 10:16:43 -0800, (jackkincaid)
mysteriously appeared thru the usenet mist to inform us thus...
[...]
The Guardian and Independent regularly publish articles in praise of
Islam, written in the former case by associates of terrorists, in the
latter by bin Laden's favourite 'western' reptile, Robert Fisk.
Rubbish. Fisk is one of the best journos we have; one of the few
with the guts to tell the truth like it is.
--
Q, Whatever happened to the freedom-loving, forward-thinking,
right-minded America that was the envy of the world?
A, George W Bush became president.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Condor" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 02:04:43 PM |
|
|
In article <qvg2v09jrujfqbdri8mh4io9fcdavihj9t@4ax.com>,
hummingbird <QLPRRFMZDVLP@spammotel.com> wrote:
Rubbish. Fisk is one of the best journos we have
"journo" = ***** who thinks he's a journalist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 10:41:49 PM |
|
|
Condor wrote:
In article <qvg2v09jrujfqbdri8mh4io9fcdavihj9t@4ax.com>,
hummingbird <QLPRRFMZDVLP@spammotel.com> wrote:
Rubbish. Fisk is one of the best journos we have
"journo" = ***** who thinks he's a journalist
Nope. Just an abbreviation.
And as journalists go...Fisk is one of the best.
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "hummingbird" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 04:14:42 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:04:43 -0600, Condor <JTurner@balcony.com>
mysteriously appeared thru the usenet mist to inform us thus...
In article <qvg2v09jrujfqbdri8mh4io9fcdavihj9t@4ax.com>,
hummingbird <QLPRRFMZDVLP@spammotel.com> wrote:
Rubbish. Fisk is one of the best journos we have
"journo" = ***** who thinks he's a journalist
Only in your twisted opinion.
--
Q, Whatever happened to the freedom-loving, forward-thinking,
right-minded America that was the envy of the world?
A, George W Bush became president.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "abelard" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 07:18:38 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:04:43 -0600, Condor <JTurner@balcony.com>
typed:
In article <qvg2v09jrujfqbdri8mh4io9fcdavihj9t@4ax.com>,
hummingbird <QLPRRFMZDVLP@spammotel.com> wrote:
Rubbish. Fisk is one of the best journos we have
god help 'us'
"journo" = ***** who thinks he's a journalist
do you eat hummingbirds....or are they too small?
--
web site at www.abelard.org - news and comment service, logic,
energy, education, politics, etc 1,092,815 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "hummingbird" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 08:43:58 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:18:38 +0100, abelard <abelard2@abelard.org>
mysteriously appeared thru the usenet mist to inform us thus...
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:04:43 -0600, Condor <JTurner@balcony.com>
typed:
In article <qvg2v09jrujfqbdri8mh4io9fcdavihj9t@4ax.com>,
hummingbird <QLPRRFMZDVLP@spammotel.com> wrote:
Rubbish. Fisk is one of the best journos we have
god help 'us'
That depends on whether you become a good yak.
If not, He will abandon you.
"journo" = ***** who thinks he's a journalist
do you eat hummingbirds....or are they too small?
Wots up lardy -- has your frock got twisted again?
This sig will sort you out:
--
website at www.abe-blah.con - lies, noos, koment, poopaganda, loonacy
on enerjee, edukashon, polytiks etc >70½ zillion dokument calls yeerly.
WARNING: i kollect private data from all users who access my webshite.
ho hum. All i ask is for you to let my webshite invade yor privacy.
i am a paid up member of the Ministree of Trooth.
i rite the Daily Slime and wen i say it is so, IT IS SO.
Middle East oil *belongs* to the West. i sed so. i aM pooP Lardy.
my best fiend is auroran...he weras yellow pants and bloo-rinse haire.
my secund bestest fiend is greg haemorrhoids.
George Bush is my ikon & heero, he's a grate leeder.
.....i Want Amurrica to bomb Iran cos they're moslems.
------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quikly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big yak poop.
the neo-cons stay in power [] trust nobody especially me.
only when it's bummy -- woger 'lardy' wabbit
------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 10:43:05 PM |
|
|
abelard wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:04:43 -0600, Condor <JTurner@balcony.com>
typed:
In article <qvg2v09jrujfqbdri8mh4io9fcdavihj9t@4ax.com>,
hummingbird <QLPRRFMZDVLP@spammotel.com> wrote:
Rubbish. Fisk is one of the best journos we have
god help 'us'
"journo" = ***** who thinks he's a journalist
do you eat hummingbirds....or are they too small?
Oh dear, another idiot that I forgot about.
Back to the kill-file with ya.
*PLONK*
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "mac" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
26 Jan 2005 12:49:17 PM |
|
|
We have Apathied in UK now with Asian nights only at swimming pools
etc. Really like to see a Muslim win Olypic swimming in their Nuns
costume.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Cossey" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
26 Jan 2005 03:44:41 PM |
|
|
"mac" <adrian@bonni.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1106765357.314995.282810@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
We have Apathied in UK now with Asian nights only at swimming pools
etc. Really like to see a Muslim win Olypic swimming in their Nuns
costume.
What's this "Asian nights only" thing? Sounds a bit racist to me.
Alan Cossey
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Bailey" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
20 Jan 2005 05:15:21 PM |
|
|
jackkincaid wrote:
And the hypocrisy of those who denigrate and ridicule Christianity,
or
Judaism or Hinduism, but never ever have a bad word to say about
Islam, frankly disgust me - especially given the slaughter currently
being carried out worldwide in Islam's name. They are cowards and
hypocrites.
You see this is where your argument falls apart. Islam gets a lot of
defenders at the moment because too many people think that a handful of
crazies wanting to kill everyone means that they all feel the same way.
I have no problem with criticising elements of whatever faith you like
- or even the concept of faith.
But this isn't a criticism of Islam being levelled at it, itys blind
hatred from people who see all muslims as being barbarians or
terrorists. Which the vast majority of them are not.
I don't want to victimise Muslims - far from it; I want to save them
from further victimisation by the 'guardians' of their creed, and the
likes of Livingstone who will forever associate them with fascists
like Qaradawi in the UK public's mind - but I want their religion,
its
history, the things for which it stands, discussed openly and
candidly, from a secular perspective, as every other religion may be.
Why is this so frightening? You aren't a Muslim; unless I miss my
guess, you wouldn't convert to Islam in a million years. Therefore
you
have made a judgement that Islam is an inferior way of thinking, of
being, for you; you are, in the true sense of the word, an
Islamaphobe, as are we all unless we are Muslims. In which case, why
are you so scared of announcing it? Why are you so frightened of
giving offence to followers of this religious ideology (this bubndle
of half baked abstract dead ideas) when I doubt you'd think twice
about condemning or criticising, or at least talking about, any other
(bundle of equally silly and dead ideas)?
Again, noone is trying to say that open criticism of Islam, or
Christianity, or whatever faith you like, is wrong. I think that
Qaradawi and his followers are cretins. But its a free country and
until he commits any crimes he should be as free to express his
opinions as you or I - isn't that one of the freedoms that is the
foundation of our society?
I am not afraid of muslims, and I think that many of their customs and
beliefs are wrong. But that doesn't mean that I don't respect their
faith. The idea that Islamic tradition means that all British muslims
beat their wives or want to kill us is a nonsense - defending them
against this kind of slur does not mean that I agree with everything
they say or do.
ian
.
|
|
|
| User: "Zev" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 01:11:53 AM |
|
|
"Ian Bailey" <ianjbailey@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1106262921.758873.167610@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
<snipped>
You see this is where your argument falls apart. Islam gets a lot of
defenders at the moment because too many people think that a handful of
crazies wanting to kill everyone means that they all feel the same way.
The 'crazies' are always a handful.
In every population,
the large majority are interested in themselves only, at best,
they will worry also about getting a good seat in Paradise.
But lately, Islam has become everyone's problem.
It is not a question of blind hatred.
Only a tiny percentage of Muslims are terrorists,
but a very large percentage of terrorists are Muslims.
The blindness is only in refusing to recognize that fact.
<snipped>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 11:54:55 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:11:53 +0200, "Zev" <zev_horn@yahoo.com> said in
alt.atheism:
But lately, Islam has become everyone's problem.
It is not a question of blind hatred.
Only a tiny percentage of Muslims are terrorists,
but a very large percentage of terrorists are Muslims.
A much larger percentage of terrorists are Americans.
--
"I have never imputed to Nature a purpose or a goal, or anything that could be under-
stood as anthropomorphic. What I see in Nature is a magnificent structure that we can
comprehend only very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of
humility. This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism."
- 1954 or 1955; quoted in Dukas and Hoffman _Albert Einstein the Human Side_, p. 39
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "maff" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
23 Jan 2005 04:21:50 AM |
|
|
Zev wrote:
"Ian Bailey" <ianjbailey@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1106262921.758873.167610@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
<snipped>
You see this is where your argument falls apart. Islam gets a lot
of
defenders at the moment because too many people think that a
handful of
crazies wanting to kill everyone means that they all feel the same
way.
The 'crazies' are always a handful.
In every population,
the large majority are interested in themselves only, at best,
they will worry also about getting a good seat in Paradise.
But lately, Islam has become everyone's problem.
It is not a question of blind hatred.
Only a tiny percentage of Muslims are terrorists,
but a very large percentage of terrorists are Muslims.
The blindness is only in refusing to recognize that fact.
But it's Christian fundamentalist terrorists who're killing and
torturing in Iraq.
<snipped>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 10:40:51 PM |
|
|
Zev wrote:
"Ian Bailey" <ianjbailey@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1106262921.758873.167610@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
<snipped>
You see this is where your argument falls apart. Islam gets a lot of
defenders at the moment because too many people think that a handful of
crazies wanting to kill everyone means that they all feel the same way.
The 'crazies' are always a handful.
In every population,
the large majority are interested in themselves only, at best,
they will worry also about getting a good seat in Paradise.
But lately, Islam has become everyone's problem.
And Christianity.
It is not a question of blind hatred.
Only a tiny percentage of Muslims are terrorists,
but a very large percentage of terrorists are Muslims.
And Christians.
The blindness is only in refusing to recognize that fact.
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Energumen" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 04:08:41 PM |
|
|
"Ian Bailey" <ianjbailey@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1106262921.758873.167610@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
jackkincaid wrote:
And the hypocrisy of those who denigrate and ridicule Christianity,
or
Judaism or Hinduism, but never ever have a bad word to say about
Islam, frankly disgust me - especially given the slaughter currently
being carried out worldwide in Islam's name. They are cowards and
hypocrites.
You see this is where your argument falls apart. Islam gets a lot of
defenders at the moment because too many people think that a handful of
crazies wanting to kill everyone means that they all feel the same way.
I have no problem with criticising elements of whatever faith you like
- or even the concept of faith.
Do you have a problem with someone saying that Islam is the source of
Islamic terrorism? That it's teachings promote violence? Am I allowed to
present evidence or will you just dismiss this out of hand?
But this isn't a criticism of Islam being levelled at it, itys blind
hatred from people who see all muslims as being barbarians or
terrorists. Which the vast majority of them are not.
The vast majority of members of the german Nazi party in the period
1919-1945 never killed anyone either, even in the period 1939-1945 that
would be true.
I don't want to victimise Muslims - far from it; I want to save them
from further victimisation by the 'guardians' of their creed, and the
likes of Livingstone who will forever associate them with fascists
like Qaradawi in the UK public's mind - but I want their religion,
its
history, the things for which it stands, discussed openly and
candidly, from a secular perspective, as every other religion may be.
Why is this so frightening? You aren't a Muslim; unless I miss my
guess, you wouldn't convert to Islam in a million years. Therefore
you
have made a judgement that Islam is an inferior way of thinking, of
being, for you; you are, in the true sense of the word, an
Islamaphobe, as are we all unless we are Muslims. In which case, why
are you so scared of announcing it? Why are you so frightened of
giving offence to followers of this religious ideology (this bubndle
of half baked abstract dead ideas) when I doubt you'd think twice
about condemning or criticising, or at least talking about, any other
(bundle of equally silly and dead ideas)?
Again, noone is trying to say that open criticism of Islam, or
Christianity, or whatever faith you like, is wrong. I think that
Qaradawi and his followers are cretins.
Who do you think Qaradawi is? Do you think that he is "extreme" wrt what
most Muslims believe? He isn't.
But its a free country and
until he commits any crimes he should be as free to express his
opinions as you or I - isn't that one of the freedoms that is the
foundation of our society?
He is expressing Islam and not a very "extreme" version of it at all. If, as
you say, you think that "Qaradawi and his followers are cretins" then you
must surely then think that the vast majority of Muslims are cretins.
Otherwise you are either ignorant or hypocritical. I'm guessing it's the
former.
I am not afraid of muslims, and I think that many of their customs and
beliefs are wrong. But that doesn't mean that I don't respect their
faith.
What does that actually mean? Are there faiths you don't respect?
The idea that Islamic tradition means that all British muslims
beat their wives or want to kill us is a nonsense - defending them
against this kind of slur does not mean that I agree with everything
they say or do.
ian
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Logos" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 08:32:01 AM |
|
|
On 20 Jan 2005 15:15:21 -0800, "Ian Bailey" <ianjbailey@gmail.com>
wrote:
I am not afraid of muslims, and I think that many of their customs and
beliefs are wrong. But that doesn't mean that I don't respect their
faith. The idea that Islamic tradition means that all British muslims
beat their wives or want to kill us is a nonsense - defending them
against this kind of slur does not mean that I agree with everything
they say or do.
ian
Think a sheep to be a moderate muslim and a dog a radical muslim, how
many dogs are necessary to control a flock?
If sheeps do not rebel, dogs will rule them forever. If moderate
muslims do not rebel, fundamentalists and terrorists will win and they
will determine which is the true version of islam.
Logos
giocar3ABC@libero.it
Remove A B C
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 08:54:25 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:32:01 +0100, Logos <giocar3ABC@libero.it>
wrote:
On 20 Jan 2005 15:15:21 -0800, "Ian Bailey" <ianjbailey@gmail.com>
wrote:
I am not afraid of muslims, and I think that many of their customs and
beliefs are wrong. But that doesn't mean that I don't respect their
faith. The idea that Islamic tradition means that all British muslims
beat their wives or want to kill us is a nonsense - defending them
against this kind of slur does not mean that I agree with everything
they say or do.
ian
Think a sheep to be a moderate muslim and a dog a radical muslim, how
many dogs are necessary to control a flock?
If sheeps do not rebel, dogs will rule them forever. If moderate
muslims do not rebel, fundamentalists and terrorists will win and they
will determine which is the true version of islam.
Think a sheep as a moderate Christian and a dog a fundamentalist. If
sheep do not rebel, fundamentalists and terrorists will win and they
will determine which is the "true" version of Christianiity.
And we've got the dogs in power at the moment.
Logos
giocar3ABC@libero.it
Remove A B C
.
|
|
|
| User: "Energumen" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
21 Jan 2005 04:10:05 PM |
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:qp52v0pjdijvkj5o58sea7tiknlnqjgvt0@4ax.com...
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:32:01 +0100, Logos <giocar3ABC@libero.it>
wrote:
On 20 Jan 2005 15:15:21 -0800, "Ian Bailey" <ianjbailey@gmail.com>
wrote:
I am not afraid of muslims, and I think that many of their customs and
beliefs are wrong. But that doesn't mean that I don't respect their
faith. The idea that Islamic tradition means that all British muslims
beat their wives or want to kill us is a nonsense - defending them
against this kind of slur does not mean that I agree with everything
they say or do.
ian
Think a sheep to be a moderate muslim and a dog a radical muslim, how
many dogs are necessary to control a flock?
If sheeps do not rebel, dogs will rule them forever. If moderate
muslims do not rebel, fundamentalists and terrorists will win and they
will determine which is the true version of islam.
Think a sheep as a moderate Christian and a dog a fundamentalist. If
sheep do not rebel, fundamentalists and terrorists will win and they
will determine which is the "true" version of Christianiity.
The true versions are respectively those which are written in the relevant
holy texts.
And we've got the dogs in power at the moment.
Logos
giocar3ABC@libero.it
Remove A B C
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Logos" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
22 Jan 2005 08:33:59 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:54:25 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:32:01 +0100, Logos <giocar3ABC@libero.it>
wrote:
On 20 Jan 2005 15:15:21 -0800, "Ian Bailey" <ianjbailey@gmail.com>
wrote:
I am not afraid of muslims, and I think that many of their customs and
beliefs are wrong. But that doesn't mean that I don't respect their
faith. The idea that Islamic tradition means that all British muslims
beat their wives or want to kill us is a nonsense - defending them
against this kind of slur does not mean that I agree with everything
they say or do.
ian
Think a sheep to be a moderate muslim and a dog a radical muslim, how
many dogs are necessary to control a flock?
If sheeps do not rebel, dogs will rule them forever. If moderate
muslims do not rebel, fundamentalists and terrorists will win and they
will determine which is the true version of islam.
Think a sheep as a moderate Christian and a dog a fundamentalist. If
sheep do not rebel, fundamentalists and terrorists will win and they
will determine which is the "true" version of Christianiity.
True, but christianity has too few fundamentalists to rule moderate
christians. Christian societies are SECULAR, PLURALISTIC, DEMOCRATIC
AND FREE!!!
Logos
giocar3ABC@libero.it
Remove A B C
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Cossey" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
23 Jan 2005 02:31:00 PM |
|
|
"Logos" <giocar3ABC@libero.it> wrote in message
news:70p4v011n1uvc4eh7jb39l4s6t7vc1fsdq@4ax.com...
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:54:25 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:32:01 +0100, Logos <giocar3ABC@libero.it>
wrote:
On 20 Jan 2005 15:15:21 -0800, "Ian Bailey" <ianjbailey@gmail.com>
wrote:
I am not afraid of muslims, and I think that many of their customs and
beliefs are wrong. But that doesn't mean that I don't respect their
faith. The idea that Islamic tradition means that all British muslims
beat their wives or want to kill us is a nonsense - defending them
against this kind of slur does not mean that I agree with everything
they say or do.
ian
Think a sheep to be a moderate muslim and a dog a radical muslim, how
many dogs are necessary to control a flock?
If sheeps do not rebel, dogs will rule them forever. If moderate
muslims do not rebel, fundamentalists and terrorists will win and they
will determine which is the true version of islam.
Think a sheep as a moderate Christian and a dog a fundamentalist. If
sheep do not rebel, fundamentalists and terrorists will win and they
will determine which is the "true" version of Christianiity.
True, but christianity has too few fundamentalists to rule moderate
christians. Christian societies are SECULAR, PLURALISTIC, DEMOCRATIC
AND FREE!!!
Logos
giocar3ABC@libero.it
Remove A B C
I'm struggling to think of which society you are talking about. I would
suggest that there are few (no?) Christians who would describe their own
society as being truly Christian.
Alan Cossey
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Dell" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
24 Jan 2005 05:00:05 AM |
|
|
"Alan Cossey" <alanXYXYXY@cossey58.freeserve.co.uk.XYXYZYZY> wrote in message
news:ct11fp$1q1$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
| >>Think a sheep as a moderate Christian and a dog a fundamentalist. If
| >>sheep do not rebel, fundamentalists and terrorists will win and they
| >>will determine which is the "true" version of Christianiity.
| >
| > True, but christianity has too few fundamentalists to rule moderate
| > christians. Christian societies are SECULAR, PLURALISTIC, DEMOCRATIC
| > AND FREE!!!
| >
| > Logos
| >
| > Remove A B C
|
| I'm struggling to think of which society you are talking about. I would
| suggest that there are few (no?) Christians who would describe their own
| society as being truly Christian.
True. And never will there be - it is a Utopia and as with all Utopias, fails to
take account of human nature. The attempt to impose the utopian views of the few
on the many is the source of much misery in this world and is doomed to failure.
The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found
difficult and left untried. - G.K.Chesterton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Cossey" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
24 Jan 2005 09:59:27 AM |
|
|
"Richard Dell" <rfdell@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:41f4d886$0$115$65c69314@mercury.nildram.net...
"Alan Cossey" <alanXYXYXY@cossey58.freeserve.co.uk.XYXYZYZY> wrote in
message
news:ct11fp$1q1$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
| >>Think a sheep as a moderate Christian and a dog a fundamentalist. If
| >>sheep do not rebel, fundamentalists and terrorists will win and they
| >>will determine which is the "true" version of Christianiity.
| >
| > True, but christianity has too few fundamentalists to rule moderate
| > christians. Christian societies are SECULAR, PLURALISTIC, DEMOCRATIC
| > AND FREE!!!
| >
| > Logos
| >
| > Remove A B C
|
| I'm struggling to think of which society you are talking about. I would
| suggest that there are few (no?) Christians who would describe their own
| society as being truly Christian.
True. And never will there be - it is a Utopia and as with all Utopias,
fails to
take account of human nature. The attempt to impose the utopian views of
the few
on the many is the source of much misery in this world and is doomed to
failure.
The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been
found
difficult and left untried. - G.K.Chesterton
Though of course Christians believe that one day, Jesus Christ will return
and wrap everything up. Then there will be no more evil, no more pain, no
more tears. The difference is that God himself will be doing all the sorting
out and it won't be left to fallible humans like me. The bible speaks of a
day of judgement when everyone will be judged. Despite some obvious
erroneous attempts at it over the years, e.g. the Inquisition, conquistadors
and so on, Christians know that you can't force anyone to become a Christian
and hence there is always going to be this tension between trying to get the
world to be a good place and half expecting much of our efforts to be of no
avail. Jesus called us to be salt in this world, i.e. stop it from going
rotten, but he also warned us that we would get a poke in the eye or worse
when trying to do it.
Alan Cossey
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
23 Jan 2005 10:40:21 PM |
|
|
Alan Cossey wrote:
"Logos" <giocar3ABC@libero.it> wrote in message
news:70p4v011n1uvc4eh7jb39l4s6t7vc1fsdq@4ax.com...
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:54:25 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:32:01 +0100, Logos <giocar3ABC@libero.it>
wrote:
On 20 Jan 2005 15:15:21 -0800, "Ian Bailey" <ianjbailey@gmail.com>
wrote:
I am not afraid of muslims, and I think that many of their customs and
beliefs are wrong. But that doesn't mean that I don't respect their
faith. The idea that Islamic tradition means that all British muslims
beat their wives or want to kill us is a nonsense - defending them
against this kind of slur does not mean that I agree with everything
they say or do.
ian
Think a sheep to be a moderate muslim and a dog a radical muslim, how
many dogs are necessary to control a flock?
If sheeps do not rebel, dogs will rule them forever. If moderate
muslims do not rebel, fundamentalists and terrorists will win and they
will determine which is the true version of islam.
Think a sheep as a moderate Christian and a dog a fundamentalist. If
sheep do not rebel, fundamentalists and terrorists will win and they
will determine which is the "true" version of Christianiity.
True, but christianity has too few fundamentalists to rule moderate
christians. Christian societies are SECULAR, PLURALISTIC, DEMOCRATIC
AND FREE!!!
Logos
giocar3ABC@libero.it
Remove A B C
I'm struggling to think of which society you are talking about. I would
suggest that there are few (no?) Christians who would describe their own
society as being truly Christian.
Hell...***** their 'society' how many of them believe their book is
'Truly Christian' ?
'Thou shalt not kill' = equals 'vote for war criminals' to a whole load
of them.
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Labirinti" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
25 Jan 2005 09:46:44 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:31:00 -0000, "Alan Cossey"
<alanXYXYXY@cossey58.freeserve.co.uk.XYXYZYZY> wrote:
True, but christianity has too few fundamentalists to rule moderate
christians. Christian societies are SECULAR, PLURALISTIC, DEMOCRATIC
AND FREE!!!
Logos
giocar3ABC@libero.it
Remove A B C
I'm struggling to think of which society you are talking about. I would
suggest that there are few (no?) Christians who would describe their own
society as being truly Christian.
Alan Cossey
You are right, there are no true christian societies. Muslim believe
western societies are (completely) christian and they name them so.
In a post of mines of the 24 jan 05, I made this distinction and I
used the term of western societies.
Muslim believe that western societies are ruled by religion in the
same way of their societies. They do not understand that in our
societies religion is not so important. They do not understand that
the fight is not between islam and christianity, but between a
totalitarianism and the western pluralism and freedom.
Logos
giocar3ABC@libero.it
Remove A B C
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
25 Jan 2005 11:09:33 AM |
|
|
On 25 Jan 2005 16:46:44 +0100, Labirinti <giocar3ABC@libero.it> wrote:
Muslim believe that western societies are ruled by religion in the
same way of their societies. They do not understand that in our
societies religion is not so important. They do not understand that
the fight is not between islam and christianity, but between a
totalitarianism and the western pluralism and freedom.
Unless you're in the USA today.
Logos
giocar3ABC@libero.it
Remove A B C
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "sAnToLiNa" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
22 Jan 2005 09:47:10 PM |
|
|
Logos <giocar3ABC@libero.it> wrote in message
news:70p4v011n1uvc4eh7jb39l4s6t7vc1fsdq@4ax.com...
Christian societies are SECULAR,
Eh?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
22 Jan 2005 11:11:01 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:47:10 -0800, "sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com>
said in alt.atheism:
Logos <giocar3ABC@libero.it> wrote in message
news:70p4v011n1uvc4eh7jb39l4s6t7vc1fsdq@4ax.com...
Christian societies are SECULAR,
Eh?
Black is white
Slavery is freedom
War is peace
--
"I can't activate two neurons simultaneously, and I vote"
- The theistic majority
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Logos" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam and multiculturalism: what I want |
23 Jan 2005 06:39:38 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:11:01 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:47:10 -0800, "sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com>
said in alt.atheism:
Logos <giocar3ABC@libero.it> wrote in message
news:70p4v011n1uvc4eh7jb39l4s6t7vc1fsdq@4ax.com...
Christian societies are SECULAR,
Eh?
Black is white
Slavery is freedom
War is peace
And christian societies are secular.
Logos
giocar3ABC@libero.it
Remove A B C
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|