Staffan S wrote:
<Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:1141324011.485342.140790@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Staffan S wrote:
"Cyde Weys" <cydeweys@gmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:Xns977A6BF4EC3C2galopagosterrapincy@216.196.97.136...
The Jyllands-Posten crew ARE NOT STEPPING DOWN. Kudos to them. Here
ya
go.
< http://www.jp.dk/indland/artikel:aid=3585740/ >
Great article, and one I agree with. Just one reminder, though possibly
not
needed for the majority on this ng:
Islam is nearly as diverse as Christianity, and it would be a great
mistake
to equate Islam and Islamism. Islamists are the Ahmansson and Robertson
of
Islam, and lumping them together with more moderate Moslems is likely
to
create more problem than it solves.
You are the one who is not being consistent with the Bible
And I accused exactly who of not being consistent with the Bible?
by opposing Islam to Christianity while the Bible says
otherwise.
To me, "opposing" suggest there exists a conflict. Are you telling us that
the Bible says there is no conflict between Islam and Christianity?
Not at all... Islam claims to be the the Original Christianity of
Jerusalem
time. How could that same Islam be conflicting with Christianity.
Such a deliberate exegitical work is a
distorsion and likely to make the confrontation worse
In this sentence, do you intend "exegitical" to be insulting? Just
curious.
The Claim by Islam to be the Original Christianity of Jesus'Aspostles
is consistent with The western canon of the Scriptures, the Bible.
Yet some without knowing it Claim Paul's Christianity
to be not only the Original
Christianity but the sole in the Bible. This is what is insulting
to our intelligence and not exegetical.
Staffan S
.
