Religions > Atheism > Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Codebreaker" |
| Date: |
04 Jun 2007 01:04:06 PM |
| Object: |
Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
So it came to pass that the GLORIOUS APOSTLES had gathered
in Jerusalem to settle some issues regarding the circumcision of
the Gentiles.
James, the "brothers" of the Lord suggested that the Hebraic
Christians
should kept the costums of Moses while agreeing with Paul that
the Gentiles should not be pressured to become Jews through
circumcision and by following other Mosaic costums as spelled out
in The Glorious Torah. Act 15
As the Edict of Milan allowed the State of the Roman Empire
to back Paul's teaching expressed in the Nicea Creed, the
Hebraic Christians found themselves marginalized and their
Hebraic Christianity doctrines ridiculed as heresies by
the Roman Scholars and bishops.
On the other hand, the Jewish Council of Jamnia which set out
to stop Christianity had made the cohabitation between
Hebraic Christian and Jews of Judaism very difficult and uneasy.
The Evils Jews, that is to say the Jews who did not want
to accept Jesus as the Christ/Messiah foretold by Moses
in the Torah deviced a strategy to put out of Synagogues the Hebraic
Christians. It is worth noticing that up to that point in time the two
groups had always shared the same service in the same Synagogues
despite of their disagreement regarding Jesus.
So the Pigs Jews introduced in the service some prayers very insulting
to Christ just to embarrasse the Hebraic Christians.
The Hebraic Christians found therefore themselves in disagreement
with the TRINATARIAN CREED in vogue with the Roman bishops
on one hand and in opposition with their brethen Jews of Judaism
on the other hand.
While some Jews of Judaism made it as a business to send delegations
to
foreign rulers to warn them against Christianity and Christ, the
Hebraic Christianity did the same in a bit to convince
rulers to back their doctrines and dogmas and Law. Much of
the competition was about finding a God-fearing ruler who could
understand their cause.
The 7th Century, turned out to be a turning point for
Hebraic Christianity. It was about to score a major point with
the birth of an Arabian warrior later dubbed Mohammad...
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATEUR"
Codebreaker
.
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
04 Jun 2007 02:13:25 PM |
|
|
So it came to pass that the GLORIOUS APOSTLES had gathered
in Jerusalem to settle some issues regarding the circumcision of
the Gentiles.
James, the "brothers" of the Lord suggested that the Hebraic
Christians
should kept the costums of Moses while agreeing with Paul that
the Gentiles should not be pressured to become Jews through
circumcision and by following other Mosaic costums as spelled out
in The Glorious Torah. Act 15
As the Edict of Milan allowed the State of the Roman Empire
to back Paul's teaching expressed in the Nicea Creed, the
Hebraic Christians found themselves marginalized and their
Hebraic Christianity doctrines ridiculed as heresies by
the Roman Scholars and bishops.
On the other hand, the Jewish Council of Jamnia which set out
to stop Christianity had made the cohabitation between
Hebraic Christian and Jews of Judaism very difficult and uneasy.
The Evils Jews, that is to say the Jews who did not want
to accept Jesus as the Christ/Messiah foretold by Moses
in the Torah deviced a strategy to put out of Synagogues the Hebraic
Christians. It is worth noticing that up to that point in time the
two
groups had always shared the same service in the same Synagogues
despite of their disagreement regarding Jesus.
So the Pigs Jews introduced in the service some prayers very
insulting
to Christ just to embarrasse the Hebraic Christians.
The Hebraic Christians found therefore themselves in disagreement
with the TRINATARIAN CREED in vogue with the Roman bishops
on one hand and in opposition with their brethen Jews of Judaism
on the other hand.
While some Jews of Judaism made it as a business to send delegations
to
foreign rulers to warn them against Christianity and Christ, the
Hebraic Christianity did the same in a bit to convince
rulers to back their doctrines and dogmas and Law. Much of
the competition was about finding a God-fearing ruler who could
understand their cause.
The 7th Century, turned out to be a turning point for
Hebraic Christianity. It was about to score a major point with
the birth of an Arabian warrior later dubbed Mohammad...
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Codebreaker
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
04 Jun 2007 02:19:51 PM |
|
|
In article <1180984405.729395.23310@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
04 Jun 2007 07:57:46 PM |
|
|
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
04 Jun 2007 10:51:05 PM |
|
|
Codebreaker wrote:
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
Way to blow off the response with a remark that is both fatuous and cutesy
intellectual window dressing.
/french accent on/
I don't wanna talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough
wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your
father smelt of elderberries! Now, go away, or I shall taunt you a second
time-a!
/french accent off/
See, two can play at that game.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
05 Jun 2007 06:05:28 PM |
|
|
On Jun 4, 11:51 pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Codebreaker wrote:
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
Way to blow off the response with a remark that is both fatuous and cutesy
intellectual window dressing.
Thank you for the compliment... We already knew that
Evol-atheist were self-absorbed. But we did not know
some like you could take time off and see the merit of others
/french accent on/
I don't wanna talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough
wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your
father smelt of elderberries! Now, go away, or I shall taunt you a second
time-a!
/french accent off/
See, two can play at that game.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
05 Jun 2007 07:21:01 PM |
|
|
Codebreaker wrote:
On Jun 4, 11:51 pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Codebreaker wrote:
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
Way to blow off the response with a remark that is both fatuous and
cutesy intellectual window dressing.
Thank you for the compliment... We already knew that
Evol-atheist were self-absorbed. But we did not know
some like you could take time off and see the merit of others
For the life of me, I can't see how that is a compliment. Wow! You have been
abused.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
08 Jun 2007 12:01:14 PM |
|
|
On Jun 5, 8:21 pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Codebreaker wrote:
On Jun 4, 11:51 pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Codebreaker wrote:
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
Way to blow off the response with a remark that is both fatuous and
cutesy intellectual window dressing.
Thank you for the compliment... We already knew that
Evol-atheist were self-absorbed. But we did not know
some like you could take time off and see the merit of others
For the life of me, I can't see how that is a compliment. Wow! You have been
abused.- Hide quoted text -
Here is a homework for you. Find in the dictionary
what sacarsm means and write that definition down 100 times
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
09 Jun 2007 09:20:54 AM |
|
|
Codebreaker wrote:
Way to blow off the response with a remark that is both fatuous and
cutesy intellectual window dressing.
Thank you for the compliment... We already knew that
Evol-atheist were self-absorbed. But we did not know
some like you could take time off and see the merit of others
For the life of me, I can't see how that is a compliment. Wow! You
have been abused.
Here is a homework for you. Find in the dictionary
what sacarsm means and write that definition down 100 times
Not to mention the spelling. ;-)
Here's a clue. There are ways to help convey the tone of sarcasm that is
lost in the written word. Can you think of one? (Hint: the answer is nigh.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
09 Jun 2007 03:52:26 PM |
|
|
On Jun 9, 10:20 am, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Codebreaker wrote:
Way to blow off the response with a remark that is both fatuous and
cutesy intellectual window dressing.
Thank you for the compliment... We already knew that
Evol-atheist were self-absorbed. But we did not know
some like you could take time off and see the merit of others
For the life of me, I can't see how that is a compliment. Wow! You
have been abused.
Here is a homework for you. Find in the dictionary
what sacarsm means and write that definition down 100 times
Not to mention the spelling. ;-)
Here's a clue. There are ways to help convey the tone of sarcasm that is
lost in the written word. Can you think of one? (Hint: the answer is nigh.)
My spell check works perfectly jerk. No spelling mistake here except
the one you made up according to your twisted rule.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
09 Jun 2007 04:58:16 PM |
|
|
Codebreaker wrote:
On Jun 9, 10:20 am, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Codebreaker wrote:
Way to blow off the response with a remark that is both fatuous
and cutesy intellectual window dressing.
Thank you for the compliment... We already knew that
Evol-atheist were self-absorbed. But we did not know
some like you could take time off and see the merit of others
For the life of me, I can't see how that is a compliment. Wow! You
have been abused.
Here is a homework for you. Find in the dictionary
what sacarsm means and write that definition down 100 times
Not to mention the spelling. ;-)
Here's a clue. There are ways to help convey the tone of sarcasm
that is lost in the written word. Can you think of one? (Hint: the
answer is nigh.)
My spell check works perfectly jerk. No spelling mistake here except
the one you made up according to your twisted rule.
What rule are you thinking about. I've offered no rule. Go look at your post
fuckwad...it's "sarcasm", not "sacarsm".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
10 Jun 2007 05:41:02 PM |
|
|
On Jun 9, 5:58 pm, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Codebreaker wrote:
On Jun 9, 10:20 am, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Codebreaker wrote:
Way to blow off the response with a remark that is both fatuous
and cutesy intellectual window dressing.
Thank you for the compliment... We already knew that
Evol-atheist were self-absorbed. But we did not know
some like you could take time off and see the merit of others
For the life of me, I can't see how that is a compliment. Wow! You
have been abused.
Here is a homework for you. Find in the dictionary
what sacarsm means and write that definition down 100 times
Not to mention the spelling. ;-)
Here's a clue. There are ways to help convey the tone of sarcasm
that is lost in the written word. Can you think of one? (Hint: the
answer is nigh.)
My spell check works perfectly jerk. No spelling mistake here except
the one you made up according to your twisted rule.
What rule are you thinking about. I've offered no rule. Go look at your post
fuckwad...it's "sarcasm", not "sacarsm".- Hide quoted text -
Most of your posts are full of typos...Every makes them.
I made one So??????????
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
11 Jun 2007 10:10:06 AM |
|
|
Codebreaker wrote:
Here is a homework for you. Find in the dictionary
what sacarsm means and write that definition down 100 times
Not to mention the spelling. ;-)
Here's a clue. There are ways to help convey the tone of sarcasm
that is lost in the written word. Can you think of one? (Hint: the
answer is nigh.)
My spell check works perfectly jerk. No spelling mistake here except
the one you made up according to your twisted rule.
What rule are you thinking about? I've offered no rule. Go look at
your post fuckwad...it's "sarcasm", not "sacarsm".
Most of your posts are full of typos...Every makes them.
I made one So??????????
I just knew you were going to say something stupid like that.
I wasn't spell flaming. I agree spell flames are for losers.
I was giving you a little sarcastic jab for being so condescending and
telling me to look up "sacarsm" in the dictionary. I followed that with a
little winkysmile. ;-)
Then I told you: "There are ways to help convey the tone of sarcasm that is
lost in the written word. Can you think of one? (Hint: the answer is nigh.)"
Have you figured it out yet? If I get any more obvious, it loses what little
humor it had and just becomes a big, flashing neon sign saying "Codebreaker
is a humorless twit." Please don't make me turn it on.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
30 Jun 2007 04:12:35 PM |
|
|
On Jun 11, 11:10 am, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Codebreaker wrote:
Here is a homework for you. Find in the dictionary
what sacarsm means and write that definition down 100 times
Not to mention the spelling. ;-)
Here's a clue. There are ways to help convey the tone of sarcasm
that is lost in the written word. Can you think of one? (Hint: the
answer is nigh.)
My spell check works perfectly jerk. No spelling mistake here except
the one you made up according to your twisted rule.
What rule are you thinking about? I've offered no rule. Go look at
your post fuckwad...it's "sarcasm", not "sacarsm".
Most of your posts are full of typos...Every makes them.
I made one So??????????
I just knew you were going to say something stupid like that.
I wasn't spell flaming. I agree spell flames are for losers.
I was giving you a little sarcastic jab for being so condescending and
telling me to look up "sacarsm" in the dictionary. I followed that with a
little winkysmile. ;-)
Then I told you: "There are ways to help convey the tone of sarcasm that is
lost in the written word. Can you think of one? (Hint: the answer is nigh.)"
Have you figured it out yet? If I get any more obvious, it loses what little
humor it had and just becomes a big, flashing neon sign saying "Codebreaker
is a humorless twit." Please don't make me turn it on.- Hide quoted text -
What does a chimp know about HUMOUR? Nothing....
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
01 Jul 2007 10:18:32 AM |
|
|
Codebreaker wrote:
On Jun 11, 11:10 am, "Geoff" <geb...@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote:
Codebreaker wrote:
Here is a homework for you. Find in the dictionary
what sacarsm means and write that definition down 100 times
Not to mention the spelling. ;-)
Here's a clue. There are ways to help convey the tone of sarcasm
that is lost in the written word. Can you think of one? (Hint:
the answer is nigh.)
My spell check works perfectly jerk. No spelling mistake here
except the one you made up according to your twisted rule.
What rule are you thinking about? I've offered no rule. Go look at
your post fuckwad...it's "sarcasm", not "sacarsm".
Most of your posts are full of typos...Every makes them.
I made one So??????????
I just knew you were going to say something stupid like that.
I wasn't spell flaming. I agree spell flames are for losers.
I was giving you a little sarcastic jab for being so condescending
and telling me to look up "sacarsm" in the dictionary. I followed
that with a little winkysmile. ;-)
Then I told you: "There are ways to help convey the tone of sarcasm
that is lost in the written word. Can you think of one? (Hint: the
answer is nigh.)"
Have you figured it out yet? If I get any more obvious, it loses
what little humor it had and just becomes a big, flashing neon sign
saying "Codebreaker is a humorless twit." Please don't make me turn
it on.- Hide quoted text -
What does a chimp know about HUMOUR? Nothing....
On a very rudimentary level, chimpanzees and bonobos can relate to humor.
I'm going to turn on that light now, you humorless *****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
04 Jun 2007 08:15:34 PM |
|
|
In article <1181005066.574047.211410@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
And yet scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Your bad.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
05 Jun 2007 05:54:01 PM |
|
|
On Jun 4, 9:15 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181005066.574047.211...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
And yet scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hi Chien-tist... What is up prestidigitator?
Your bad.
-- cary- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
05 Jun 2007 05:57:15 PM |
|
|
In article <1181084041.863109.170900@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 9:15 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181005066.574047.211...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
And yet scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hi Chien-tist... What is up prestidigitator?
Just correcting your ignorance. Once again.
It's taking longer than we thought.
And scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
05 Jun 2007 06:07:27 PM |
|
|
On Jun 5, 6:57 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181084041.863109.170...@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 9:15 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181005066.574047.211...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
And yet scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hi Chien-tist... What is up prestidigitator?
Just correcting your ignorance. Once again.
It's taking longer than we thought.
And scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Prove it...
Jawbreaker
-- cary- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
05 Jun 2007 06:33:34 PM |
|
|
In article <1181084847.129708.147190@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 5, 6:57 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181084041.863109.170...@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 9:15 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181005066.574047.211...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
And yet scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hi Chien-tist... What is up prestidigitator?
Just correcting your ignorance. Once again.
It's taking longer than we thought.
And scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Prove it...
Certainly.
I list below -- exhaustively -- the titles of all papers appearing
in peer-reviewed scientific journals in which either bones, rocks,
or both were used in estimating the age of the universe.
Got it? Good.
Now, since it was your claim in the first place, let's see your
proof that scientists DO use bones and/or rocks in estimating
the total age of the universe.
You may put your proof here:
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
08 Jun 2007 12:06:00 PM |
|
|
On Jun 5, 7:33 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181084847.129708.147...@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 5, 6:57 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181084041.863109.170...@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 9:15 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181005066.574047.211...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
And yet scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hi Chien-tist... What is up prestidigitator?
Just correcting your ignorance. Once again.
It's taking longer than we thought.
And scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Prove it...
Certainly.
I list below -- exhaustively -- the titles of all papers appearing
in peer-reviewed scientific journals in which either bones, rocks,
or both were used in estimating the age of the universe.
Peer reviews??? My butt...
We see members of an interest group who have
pledged to advance each other interest. PERIOD
Got it? Good.
Now, since it was your claim in the first place, let's see your
proof that scientists DO use bones and/or rocks in estimating
the total age of the universe.
You may put your proof here:
-- cary- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
08 Jun 2007 12:29:22 PM |
|
|
In article <1181322360.461139.65840@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 5, 7:33 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181084847.129708.147...@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 5, 6:57 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181084041.863109.170...@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 9:15 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181005066.574047.211...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
And yet scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hi Chien-tist... What is up prestidigitator?
Just correcting your ignorance. Once again.
It's taking longer than we thought.
And scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Prove it...
Certainly.
I list below -- exhaustively -- the titles of all papers appearing
in peer-reviewed scientific journals in which either bones, rocks,
or both were used in estimating the age of the universe.
Peer reviews??? My butt...
No, I can't think of any peers who would have any interest
in reviewing your butt.
But back here in the real world, actual workers in science
find that most of their papers are rejected by peer review,
as being either inadqueately designed, questionably analysed,
or not sufficiently original.
Try again.
We see members of an interest group who have
pledged to advance each other interest. PERIOD
<Snort!> Never been to a seminar or a professional
meeging in science, have you? These makes Usenet
newsgroups look like the peaceable kindgom.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
09 Jun 2007 04:12:05 PM |
|
|
On Jun 8, 1:29 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181322360.461139.65...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 5, 7:33 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181084847.129708.147...@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 5, 6:57 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181084041.863109.170...@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 9:15 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181005066.574047.211...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
And yet scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hi Chien-tist... What is up prestidigitator?
Just correcting your ignorance. Once again.
It's taking longer than we thought.
And scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Prove it...
Certainly.
I list below -- exhaustively -- the titles of all papers appearing
in peer-reviewed scientific journals in which either bones, rocks,
or both were used in estimating the age of the universe.
Peer reviews??? My butt...
No, I can't think of any peers who would have any interest
in reviewing your butt.
But back here in the real world, actual workers in science
find that most of their papers are rejected by peer review,
as being either inadqueately designed, questionably analysed,
or not sufficiently original.
Who is there to say the standard that they set up is what is needed?
They set up their own standard on the authority of their shallow
opinion and expect the rest of us to follow them as If there was only
one way
to do things. It won't work.
Down with Cynthia Fucker, down with the liberals
Try again.
We see members of an interest group who have
pledged to advance each other interest. PERIOD
<Snort!> Never been to a seminar or a professional
meeging in science, have you? These makes Usenet
newsgroups look like the peaceable kindgom.
We true scientists go to a professional meeting while feel-good-
science
crowd goes to meeging. Meeging is a place where conspirators
lurre their delusional followers.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
08 Jun 2007 10:40:55 PM |
|
|
On Jun 8, 1:06 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 5, 7:33 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181084847.129708.147...@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 5, 6:57 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181084041.863109.170...@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 9:15 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1181005066.574047.211...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
And yet scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hi Chien-tist... What is up prestidigitator?
Just correcting your ignorance. Once again.
It's taking longer than we thought.
And scientists still do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Prove it...
Certainly.
I list below -- exhaustively -- the titles of all papers appearing
in peer-reviewed scientific journals in which either bones, rocks,
or both were used in estimating the age of the universe.
Peer reviews??? My butt...
We see members of an interest group who have
pledged to advance each other interest. PERIOD
If it were like that, we'd still be in the bronze age, but I guess
that would be OK with you...
Olrik
<snip>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
04 Jun 2007 10:25:15 PM |
|
|
On Jun 4, 8:57 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
Tu n'es qu'un ignorant vicieux et violent. Tu agresses toujours ta
femme, p'tite merde?
Olrik
.
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
05 Jun 2007 06:00:53 PM |
|
|
On Jun 4, 11:25 pm, Olrik <olrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 8:57 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> Cod=
ebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
Tu n'es qu'un ignorant vicieux et violent. Tu agresses toujours ta
femme, p'tite merde?
Je n'ai rien =E0 craindre puisque tu n'es qu'un pederaste.
Autrement, Je t'aurai recherch=E9, te trouv=E9 et te donn=E9
un bon coup qui allait te faire rouler jusqu'=E0 cinq metres.
Moi au moins, j'ai une femme, je ne cours pas apr=E8s les hommes...
Olrik- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
05 Jun 2007 09:24:55 PM |
|
|
On Jun 5, 7:00 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 11:25 pm, Olrik <olrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 8:57 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> C=
odebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
Tu n'es qu'un ignorant vicieux et violent. Tu agresses toujours ta
femme, p'tite merde?
Je n'ai rien =E0 craindre puisque tu n'es qu'un pederaste.
Tu n'es qu'un enfant mal =E9lev=E9. La bible t'a corrompue jusqu'=E0 l'os.
Autrement, Je t'aurai recherch=E9, te trouv=E9 et te donn=E9
un bon coup qui allait te faire rouler jusqu'=E0 cinq metres.
LOL! Les menaces d'impuissants comme toi n'ont aucune valeur. Tu n'es
qu'un petit chien qui jappe. Allez, Codebreaker, fait le beau! Wouf!
Moi au moins, j'ai une femme, je ne cours pas apr=E8s les hommes...
Moi non plus, et je n'abuse pas de ma copine.
Olrik
.
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
08 Jun 2007 12:21:48 PM |
|
|
On Jun 5, 10:24 pm, Olrik <olrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 5, 7:00 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 11:25 pm, Olrik <olrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 8:57 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>=
Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
Tu n'es qu'un ignorant vicieux et violent. Tu agresses toujours ta
femme, p'tite merde?
Je n'ai rien =E0 craindre puisque tu n'es qu'un pederaste.
Tu n'es qu'un enfant mal =E9lev=E9. La bible t'a corrompue jusqu'=E0 l'os.
Tu entrain de me judger suivant les fausses valeurs
de la theorie de l'evolution si theroie c'en est une.
Mais saches bien une chose,
je me moque eperdumment de ce que tu penses de moi.
Qui es tu, O homme vain, pour te permettre de juger
les enfants appartenant la lumi=E8re divine?
Autrement, Je t'aurai recherch=E9, te trouv=E9 et te donn=E9
un bon coup qui allait te faire rouler jusqu'=E0 cinq metres.
LOL! Les menaces d'impuissants comme toi n'ont aucune valeur. Tu n'es
qu'un petit chien qui jappe. Allez, Codebreaker, fait le beau! Wouf!
L'impuissant c'est bien toi, toi qui a =E9t=E9 endoctrin=E9
par Darwin et les forces du mal.
Moi au moins, j'ai une femme, je ne cours pas apr=E8s les hommes...
Moi non plus, et je n'abuse pas de ma copine.
Ah, en voici un qui vit dans la fornication
mais qui oserait se mesurer =E0 des gens qui
marchent dans la lumi=E8re.
Que y a-t-il entre la lumi=E8re et les t=E9n=E8bres?
Quelle comparaison y aurait entre Christ et Darwin?
entre les enfants adult=E8res et les enfants de la pur=E9t=E9?
entre le mari=E9 et le "cohabitee"?
Olrik- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
08 Jun 2007 10:49:15 PM |
|
|
On Jun 8, 1:21 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 5, 10:24 pm, Olrik <olrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 5, 7:00 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 11:25 pm, Olrik <olrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 8:57 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wrot=
e:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.co=
m> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
Tu n'es qu'un ignorant vicieux et violent. Tu agresses toujours ta
femme, p'tite merde?
Je n'ai rien =E0 craindre puisque tu n'es qu'un pederaste.
Tu n'es qu'un enfant mal =E9lev=E9. La bible t'a corrompue jusqu'=E0 l'=
os.
Tu entrain de me judger suivant les fausses valeurs
de la theorie de l'evolution si theroie c'en est une.
Mais saches bien une chose,
je me moque eperdumment de ce que tu penses de moi.
Qui es tu, O homme vain, pour te permettre de juger
les enfants appartenant la lumi=E8re divine?
Autrement, Je t'aurai recherch=E9, te trouv=E9 et te donn=E9
un bon coup qui allait te faire rouler jusqu'=E0 cinq metres.
LOL! Les menaces d'impuissants comme toi n'ont aucune valeur. Tu n'es
qu'un petit chien qui jappe. Allez, Codebreaker, fait le beau! Wouf!
L'impuissant c'est bien toi, toi qui a =E9t=E9 endoctrin=E9
par Darwin et les forces du mal.
Moi au moins, j'ai une femme, je ne cours pas apr=E8s les hommes...
Moi non plus, et je n'abuse pas de ma copine.
Ah, en voici un qui vit dans la fornication
mais qui oserait se mesurer =E0 des gens qui
marchent dans la lumi=E8re.
T'es vraiment dr=F4le, cb. M=EAme les aveugles "marches dans la lumi=E8re",
ce que tu illustres =E0 chacun de tes messages d'ignorant (et content de
l'=EAtre, semble-t-il...)
Que y a-t-il entre la lumi=E8re et les t=E9n=E8bres?
Quelle comparaison y aurait entre Christ et Darwin?
Un n'a jamais exist=E9 autrement que dans des livres de mythologies,
l'autre =E0 r=E9volutionner la science de son =E9poque.
entre les enfants adult=E8res et les enfants de la pur=E9t=E9?
entre le mari=E9 et le "cohabitee"?
Je ne vois pas ce qu'un bout de papier vient faire l=E0-dedans.
Olrik
.
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
09 Jun 2007 04:03:16 PM |
|
|
On Jun 8, 11:49 pm, Olrik <olrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 8, 1:21 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 5, 10:24 pm, Olrik <olrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 5, 7:00 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 11:25 pm, Olrik <olrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 8:57 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) wr=
ote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.=
com> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
Tu n'es qu'un ignorant vicieux et violent. Tu agresses toujours ta
femme, p'tite merde?
Je n'ai rien =E0 craindre puisque tu n'es qu'un pederaste.
Tu n'es qu'un enfant mal =E9lev=E9. La bible t'a corrompue jusqu'=E0 =
l'os.
Tu entrain de me judger suivant les fausses valeurs
de la theorie de l'evolution si theroie c'en est une.
Mais saches bien une chose,
je me moque eperdumment de ce que tu penses de moi.
Qui es tu, O homme vain, pour te permettre de juger
les enfants appartenant la lumi=E8re divine?
Autrement, Je t'aurai recherch=E9, te trouv=E9 et te donn=E9
un bon coup qui allait te faire rouler jusqu'=E0 cinq metres.
LOL! Les menaces d'impuissants comme toi n'ont aucune valeur. Tu n'es
qu'un petit chien qui jappe. Allez, Codebreaker, fait le beau! Wouf!
L'impuissant c'est bien toi, toi qui a =E9t=E9 endoctrin=E9
par Darwin et les forces du mal.
Moi au moins, j'ai une femme, je ne cours pas apr=E8s les hommes...
Moi non plus, et je n'abuse pas de ma copine.
Ah, en voici un qui vit dans la fornication
mais qui oserait se mesurer =E0 des gens qui
marchent dans la lumi=E8re.
T'es vraiment dr=F4le, cb. M=EAme les aveugles "marches dans la lumi=E8re=
",
ce que tu illustres =E0 chacun de tes messages d'ignorant (et content de
l'=EAtre, semble-t-il...)
As-tu appris cela de Darwin? Cela ne m'etonnerait pas. Il ne voyait
pas plus
loin que le bout de son nez non plus
Que y a-t-il entre la lumi=E8re et les t=E9n=E8bres?
Quelle comparaison y aurait entre Christ et Darwin?
Un n'a jamais exist=E9 autrement que dans des livres de mythologies,
l'autre =E0 r=E9volutionner la science de son =E9poque.
C'est ton opinion, l'opinion d'un athee qui ne voit pas
plus loin que le bout de son NEZ.
Darwin n'a rien revolutionne sauf les anciennes mythologies grecques
qu'il a assaye de maquiller comme SCIENCE. "Feel-good-science"
n'est pas la vraie science
entre les enfants adult=E8res et les enfants de la pur=E9t=E9?
entre le mari=E9 et le "cohabitee"?
Je ne vois pas ce qu'un bout de papier vient faire l=E0-dedans.
Olrik
.
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: Islam: How The Arabs Nationalized Hebraic Christianity With Phony Hadiths |
09 Jun 2007 11:09:18 PM |
|
|
On Jun 9, 5:03 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 8, 11:49 pm, Olrik <olrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 8, 1:21 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 5, 10:24 pm, Olrik <olrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 5, 7:00 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 11:25 pm, Olrik <olrik...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 4, 8:57 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrot=
e:
On Jun 4, 3:19 pm, (Cary Kittrell) =
wrote:
In article <1180984405.729395.23...@p47g2000hsd.googlegroup=
s=2Ecom> Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> writes:
{...}
To be continued
------------------------------------
Anyone who thinks he can gaze at some bones and rocks
and tell us the age of the universe is nothing but a
"PRESTIDIGITATOR"
Quite true. That's why scientists do not use either rocks
or bones in estimating the age of the universe.
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaha LOL
Que celui qui se sent morveux se mouche. Tu t'es mouche,
Donc tu n'es qu'un morveux
Tu n'es qu'un ignorant vicieux et violent. Tu agresses toujours=
ta
femme, p'tite merde?
Je n'ai rien =E0 craindre puisque tu n'es qu'un pederaste.
Tu n'es qu'un enfant mal =E9lev=E9. La bible t'a corrompue jusqu'=
=E0 l'os.
Tu entrain de me judger suivant les fausses valeurs
de la theorie de l'evolution si theroie c'en est une.
Mais saches bien une chose,
je me moque eperdumment de ce que tu penses de moi.
Qui es tu, O homme vain, pour te permettre de juger
les enfants appartenant la lumi=E8re divine?
Autrement, Je t'aurai recherch=E9, te trouv=E9 et te donn=E9
un bon coup qui allait te faire rouler jusqu'=E0 cinq metres.
LOL! Les menaces d'impuissants comme toi n'ont aucune valeur. Tu n'=
es
qu'un petit chien qui jappe. Allez, Codebreaker, fait le beau! Wouf!
L'impuissant c'est bien toi, toi qui a =E9t=E9 endoctrin=E9
par Darwin et les forces du mal.
Moi au moins, j'ai une femme, je ne cours pas apr=E8s les hommes.=
..=2E
Moi non plus, et je n'abuse pas de ma copine.
Ah, en voici un qui vit dans la fornication
mais qui oserait se mesurer =E0 des gens qui
marchent dans la lumi=E8re.
T'es vraiment dr=F4le, cb. M=EAme les aveugles "marches dans la lumi=E8=
re",
ce que tu illustres =E0 chacun de tes messages d'ignorant (et content de
l'=EAtre, semble-t-il...)
As-tu appris cela de Darwin? Cela ne m'etonnerait pas. Il ne voyait
pas plus
loin que le bout de son nez non plus
Que y a-t-il entre la lumi=E8re et les t=E9n=E8bres?
Quelle comparaison y aurait entre Christ et Darwin?
Un n'a jamais exist=E9 autrement que dans des livres de mythologies,
l'autre =E0 r=E9volutionner la science de son =E9poque.
C'est ton opinion, l'opinion d'un athee qui ne voit pas
plus loin que le bout de son NEZ.
Ce n'est pas une opinion, c'est l'histoire et la biologie moderne. Tu
t'accroches =E0 de vieilles mythologies, alors que le monde progresse.
Remarque, tu es libre de croire ce que tu veux, mais ne vient pas nous
emb=EAter avec tes sornettes d'un autre =E2ge.
Darwin n'a rien revolutionne sauf les anciennes mythologies grecques
qu'il a assaye de maquiller comme SCIENCE. "Feel-good-science"
n'est pas la vraie science
Tu sembles avoir une fixation sur Darwin. La science de l'=E9volution
s'est beaucoup raffin=E9e au fil du temps, surtout avec la d=E9couverte de
l'ADN.
Et l'=E9volution, c'est =E7a : la modification des g=E8nes au fil du temps.
Nier cela, c'est comme nier la gravit=E9.
Olrik
entre les enfants adult=E8res et les enfants de la pur=E9t=E9?
entre le mari=E9 et le "cohabitee"?
Je ne vois pas ce qu'un bout de papier vient faire l=E0-dedans.
Olrik
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
