http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=22371
....
FP: First, tell us briefly what this libel suit was about.
Rubinstein: CAIR filed suit against Andrew Whitehead, claiming Mr.
Whitehead?s statements on the Anti-CAIR website (www.anti-cair-net.org)
were false and defamatory. The main statements were that CAIR is a
terrorist supporting front organization, that CAIR was founded by Hamas
supporters seeking to overthrow Constitutional government in the United
States and replace it with an Islamist theocracy, and that CAIR receives
funding from Islamic terrorist supporting countries. In other words, this
case was about CAIR?s connections to and support for radical Islam.
FP: CAIR clearly had something to hide by not wanting to open up its records
right?
Rubinstein: Well, I think that this is one conclusion that could be fairly
drawn. It would be logical to assume CAIR did not want to expose its
finances, its connections to foreign interests, and possibly the beliefs
and intentions of its key leadership to legal process. My guess, based on
the information we obtained during this case from a variety of sources, is
that CAIR may have been most concerned about protecting its funding sources
and its foreign backers. In truth, its leadership has been pretty open
about ideology and goals.
....
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/
--
"Its the hit dog what yelps."
- Mark Twain
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
