Religions > Atheism > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=46rom_Progressive_Europe:_Italian_Doctors_Want_To_Scr?==?ISO-8859-1?Q?ap_'Outdated'_Hippocratic_Oath?=
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Sound of Trumpet" |
| Date: |
12 Dec 2007 07:05:49 AM |
| Object: |
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=46rom_Progressive_Europe:_Italian_Doctors_Want_To_Scr?==?ISO-8859-1?Q?ap_'Outdated'_Hippocratic_Oath?= |
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938227/posts
Italian doctors want to scrap 'outdated' Hippocratic Oath
The Times ^ | 12/11/07 | Richard Owen in Rome
Posted on 12/11/2007 8:20:31 PM PST by bruinbirdman
Senior medical figures in Italy are campaigning to scrap the
Hippocratic Oath for doctors on the ground that the passages
forbidding abortion and euthanasia are outdated.
Giorgio Iannetti, a professor of surgery at Rome University, said that
the oath, which is read out by medical students when they graduate,
must either be abolished or "radically modified".
"There are passages which are no longer relevant to our times and
which newly qualified doctors know in advance they will not be able to
respect," Professor Iannetti told a medical conference in Rome.
The oath, written by Hippocrates, the Greek father of medicine, in the
4th century BC, obliges doctors to heal the sick "according to my
ability and judgment" and to "keep them from harm and injustice".
However, a new doctor also swears to "neither give a deadly drug to
anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect.
Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy."
Abortion was legalised in Italy in 1978, a decision that was confirmed
by referendum three years later, despite opposition from the Vatican.
Euthanasia -- also vehemently opposed by the Church -- remains banned,
but recent high-profile cases involving the terminally ill have
provoked a debate on whether Italy should follow the example of the
Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland and legalise it.
Carlo Flamigni, a professor of gynaecology and obstetrics at Bologna
University, said that he refused to take the Hippocratic Oath when he
graduated in 1958. Fernando Aiuti, professor of immunology at Rome
University, told Corriere della Sera that some of his students had
told him they disagreed with it, "and they have a point".
Giuseppe Remuzzi, professor of neurology at Bergamo University, noted
that in Britain The Lancet had proposed an alternative version five
years ago. The oath has already been modified in many Western medical
schools.
However, Luigi Frati, head of surgery at Rome University, argued that
the original oath "reminds new doctors of certain fundamental
concepts . . . they feel they belong to a scientific community with a
long tradition". Mauro Moroni, professor of infectious diseases at
Milan University, said that he gave his students the oath "written on
parchment in the original Greek. Some values never change".
.
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
12 Dec 2007 10:01:44 AM |
|
|
"Sound of Trumpet" <sound_of_trumpet@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:4d6490ee-4c49-48db-96fc-6f0bca33d8ba@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938227/posts
Italian doctors want to scrap 'outdated' Hippocratic Oath
The Times ^ | 12/11/07 | Richard Owen in Rome
Posted on 12/11/2007 8:20:31 PM PST by bruinbirdman
Senior medical figures in Italy are campaigning to scrap the
Hippocratic Oath for doctors on the ground that the passages
forbidding abortion and euthanasia are outdated.
Giorgio Iannetti, a professor of surgery at Rome University, said that
the oath, which is read out by medical students when they graduate,
must either be abolished or "radically modified".
"There are passages which are no longer relevant to our times and
which newly qualified doctors know in advance they will not be able to
respect," Professor Iannetti told a medical conference in Rome.
Wimps.
Unkind assholes.
Shitforbrains greedy reprobate loser fools.
Criminals.
Medical malpractice is a term used to describe crimes of omission and
commision by persons in the medical profession.
The oath, written by Hippocrates, the Greek father of medicine, in the
4th century BC, obliges doctors to heal the sick "according to my
ability and judgment" and to "keep them from harm and injustice".
However, a new doctor also swears to "neither give a deadly drug to
anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect.
Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy."
The only way I would give a deadly drug to anyone would be if that deadly
drug were used for them to commit suicide.
No way I would perform any abortion at all without obatining the dna
evidence to use to settle the issue of who fucked who and who will be
exposed as irresponsible fucker(s).
Ignorance, crime and shame and wickedness and theft and secrecy of selfish,
perverted. lazy wimps is all I see in pro-choice.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
12 Dec 2007 11:10:50 AM |
|
|
In article <SBT7j.20730$_m.3141@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
No way I would perform any abortion at all without obatining the dna
evidence to use to settle the issue of who fucked who and who will be
exposed as irresponsible fucker(s).
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the US.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
12 Dec 2007 02:17:27 PM |
|
|
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-394E31.10105012122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <SBT7j.20730$_m.3141@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
No way I would perform any abortion at all without obtaining the dna
evidence to use to settle the issue of who fucked who and who will be
exposed as irresponsible fucker(s).
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the US.
Trying to support violations of the 14th amendment and the racketeering
operations of the roevwadeists?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
12 Dec 2007 03:12:16 PM |
|
|
In article <AlX7j.40553$K27.38241@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the US.
Trying to support violations of the 14th amendment and the racketeering
operations of the roevwadeists?
Pointing out the law to an indicted lawbreaker is a moral act.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
13 Dec 2007 12:04:36 AM |
|
|
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-6CCC79.14121612122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <AlX7j.40553$K27.38241@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the US.
Trying to support violations of the 14th amendment and the racketeering
operations of the roevwadeists?
Pointing out the law to an indicted lawbreaker is a moral act.
Pointing out your allegiance to racketeering doesn't constitute a moral act
to me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
13 Dec 2007 01:05:26 AM |
|
|
In article <9Y38j.21193$N67.11500@bignews5.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-6CCC79.14121612122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <AlX7j.40553$K27.38241@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the US.
Trying to support violations of the 14th amendment and the racketeering
operations of the roevwadeists?
Pointing out the law to an indicted lawbreaker is a moral act.
Pointing out your allegiance to racketeering doesn't constitute a moral act
to me.
The only one under indictment here is JDW, so he is the closeset to a
racketeer we have among us. And I have no allegiance to JDW.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
13 Dec 2007 01:13:13 AM |
|
|
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-D27C3E.00052613122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <9Y38j.21193$N67.11500@bignews5.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-6CCC79.14121612122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <AlX7j.40553$K27.38241@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the
US.
Trying to support violations of the 14th amendment and the
racketeering
operations of the roevwadeists?
Pointing out the law to an indicted lawbreaker is a moral act.
Pointing out your allegiance to racketeering doesn't constitute a moral
act
to me.
The only one under indictment here is JDW, so he is the closeset to a
racketeer we have among us. And I have no allegiance to JDW.
Faulty logic is your forte, huh?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated'Hippocratic Oath |
12 Dec 2007 11:19:18 AM |
|
|
On Dec 12, 12:10 pm, Virgil <Vir...@com.com> wrote:
In article <SBT7j.20730$_m.3...@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
No way I would perform any abortion at all without obatining the dna
evidence to use to settle the issue of who fucked who and who will be
exposed as irresponsible fucker(s).
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the US.
The fact that he has a criminal record would indicate that he has no
regard for what is legal or not legal.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
12 Dec 2007 02:21:11 PM |
|
|
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a4b396d8-706b-47ef-8d76-7a61baf4624a@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 12:10 pm, Virgil <Vir...@com.com> wrote:
In article <SBT7j.20730$_m.3...@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
No way I would perform any abortion at all without obatining the dna
evidence to use to settle the issue of who fucked who and who will be
exposed as irresponsible fucker(s).
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the US.
The fact that he has a criminal record would indicate that he has no
regard for what is legal or not legal.
I have no criminal record or records at all.
The only record of any crime associated with me is DISCLAIMED by the
publisher of such record(s).
If you keep on demonstrating such blatant illiteracy what will people think
about you when you try to use all that information that the publisher tells
you you are using at your own risk?
I have bigtime rights in the USA, and neither you, nor the government, nor
anyone else is authorized to violate any of them.
I do not appreciate being slandered by you, the government or any other
person in the USA.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
12 Dec 2007 03:15:45 PM |
|
|
In article <4pX7j.40592$K27.37871@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a4b396d8-706b-47ef-8d76-7a61baf4624a@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 12:10 pm, Virgil <Vir...@com.com> wrote:
In article <SBT7j.20730$_m.3...@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
No way I would perform any abortion at all without obatining the dna
evidence to use to settle the issue of who fucked who and who will be
exposed as irresponsible fucker(s).
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the US.
The fact that he has a criminal record would indicate that he has no
regard for what is legal or not legal.
I have no criminal record or records at all.
The only record of any crime associated with me is DISCLAIMED by the
publisher of such record(s).
It is only the URL postings that carries a disclaimer.
It is perfectly possible to get a certified copy of any such court
records which are not disclaimed at all. But it costs money to get them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
12 Dec 2007 09:37:07 PM |
|
|
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-E43815.14154512122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <4pX7j.40592$K27.37871@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a4b396d8-706b-47ef-8d76-7a61baf4624a@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 12:10 pm, Virgil <Vir...@com.com> wrote:
In article <SBT7j.20730$_m.3...@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
No way I would perform any abortion at all without obatining the dna
evidence to use to settle the issue of who fucked who and who will
be
exposed as irresponsible fucker(s).
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the US.
The fact that he has a criminal record would indicate that he has no
regard for what is legal or not legal.
I have no criminal record or records at all.
The only record of any crime associated with me is DISCLAIMED by the
publisher of such record(s).
It is only the URL postings that carries a disclaimer.
Did it say that?
And, acpass doesn't have a url?
It is perfectly possible to get a certified copy of any such court
records which are not disclaimed at all. But it costs money to get them.
It isn't even releasable information to any party that has no lawful
interest in them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
13 Dec 2007 01:02:20 AM |
|
|
In article <RN18j.14054$k27.4940@bignews2.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-E43815.14154512122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <4pX7j.40592$K27.37871@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a4b396d8-706b-47ef-8d76-7a61baf4624a@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 12:10 pm, Virgil <Vir...@com.com> wrote:
In article <SBT7j.20730$_m.3...@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
No way I would perform any abortion at all without obatining the dna
evidence to use to settle the issue of who fucked who and who will
be
exposed as irresponsible fucker(s).
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the US.
The fact that he has a criminal record would indicate that he has no
regard for what is legal or not legal.
I have no criminal record or records at all.
The only record of any crime associated with me is DISCLAIMED by the
publisher of such record(s).
It is only the URL postings that carries a disclaimer.
Did it say that?
And, acpass doesn't have a url?
It is perfectly possible to get a certified copy of any such court
records which are not disclaimed at all. But it costs money to get them.
It isn't even releasable information to any party that has no lawful
interest in them.
According to JDW himself, in another posting, the freedom of information
act gives everyrone lawful interest in all such things.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
13 Dec 2007 01:10:18 AM |
|
|
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-B9F4D7.00022013122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <RN18j.14054$k27.4940@bignews2.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-E43815.14154512122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <4pX7j.40592$K27.37871@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a4b396d8-706b-47ef-8d76-7a61baf4624a@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 12:10 pm, Virgil <Vir...@com.com> wrote:
In article <SBT7j.20730$_m.3...@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
No way I would perform any abortion at all without obatining the
dna
evidence to use to settle the issue of who fucked who and who
will
be
exposed as irresponsible fucker(s).
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the
US.
The fact that he has a criminal record would indicate that he has no
regard for what is legal or not legal.
I have no criminal record or records at all.
The only record of any crime associated with me is DISCLAIMED by the
publisher of such record(s).
It is only the URL postings that carries a disclaimer.
Did it say that?
And, acpass doesn't have a url?
It is perfectly possible to get a certified copy of any such court
records which are not disclaimed at all. But it costs money to get
them.
It isn't even releasable information to any party that has no lawful
interest in them.
According to JDW himself, in another posting, the freedom of information
act gives everyrone lawful interest in all such things.
Why shouldn't it in areas that people are constituents in?
You thought municipal computer systems can't use password protection for
their constituents to keep you outside espionage freaks out?
What you got against the people of the area you live in knowing if you have
a concealed weapon permit or not?
You thought FOIA meant that you are entitled to run amok in areas other than
the one you inhabit?
I know how you criminal shitheads are.
You are losers.
Ignorant.
You're very ignorant and very much a nuisance.
You haven't the courage to pester people in your own area the way you pester
people so far away from you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pr0r3p" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated'Hippocratic Oath |
13 Dec 2007 09:42:45 AM |
|
|
On Dec 12, 10:37 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:
"Virgil" <Vir...@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-E43815.14154512122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <4pX7j.40592$K27.37...@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a4b396d8-706b-47ef-8d76-7a61baf4624a@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 12:10 pm, Virgil <Vir...@com.com> wrote:
In article <SBT7j.20730$_m.3...@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
No way I would perform any abortion at all without obatining the dna
evidence to use to settle the issue of who fucked who and who will
be
exposed as irresponsible fucker(s).
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the US.
The fact that he has a criminal record would indicate that he has no
regard for what is legal or not legal.
I have no criminal record or records at all.
The only record of any crime associated with me is DISCLAIMED by the
publisher of such record(s).
It is only the URL postings that carries a disclaimer.
Did it say that?
And, acpass doesn't have a url?
It is perfectly possible to get a certified copy of any such court
records which are not disclaimed at all. But it costs money to get them.
It isn't even releasable information to any party that has no lawful
interest in them.
According to what law?
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
13 Dec 2007 11:59:04 AM |
|
|
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7d40275c-4543-4ebe-8f28-092c8e9c9b11@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 10:37 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:
"Virgil" <Vir...@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-E43815.14154512122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <4pX7j.40592$K27.37...@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a4b396d8-706b-47ef-8d76-7a61baf4624a@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 12:10 pm, Virgil <Vir...@com.com> wrote:
In article <SBT7j.20730$_m.3...@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
No way I would perform any abortion at all without obatining the
dna
evidence to use to settle the issue of who fucked who and who
will
be
exposed as irresponsible fucker(s).
For JDW to perform an abortion at all is illegal everywhere in the
US.
The fact that he has a criminal record would indicate that he has no
regard for what is legal or not legal.
I have no criminal record or records at all.
The only record of any crime associated with me is DISCLAIMED by the
publisher of such record(s).
It is only the URL postings that carries a disclaimer.
Did it say that?
And, acpass doesn't have a url?
It is perfectly possible to get a certified copy of any such court
records which are not disclaimed at all. But it costs money to get
them.
It isn't even releasable information to any party that has no lawful
interest in them.
According to what law?
According to so many laws that you are seen as ignorant by asking.
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
That much is so simple to understand, taxation against the taxpayer type,
that you even asking me shows you are NOT for the law or the government.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
13 Dec 2007 03:05:33 PM |
|
|
In article <Tpe8j.27967$mb.16002@bignews9.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7d40275c-4543-4ebe-8f28-092c8e9c9b11@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 10:37 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:
"Virgil" <Vir...@com.com> wrote in message
The fact that he has a criminal record would indicate that he has no
regard for what is legal or not legal.
I have no criminal record or records at all.
The only record of any crime associated with me is DISCLAIMED by the
publisher of such record(s).
It is only the URL postings that carries a disclaimer.
Did it say that?
And, acpass doesn't have a url?
It is perfectly possible to get a certified copy of any such court
records which are not disclaimed at all. But it costs money to get
them.
It isn't even releasable information to any party that has no lawful
interest in them.
According to what law?
According to so many laws that you are seen as ignorant by asking.
How about the law allowing public access to government records?
Or are JDW's convictions a military secret?
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
13 Dec 2007 08:16:32 PM |
|
|
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-51A28E.14053313122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <Tpe8j.27967$mb.16002@bignews9.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7d40275c-4543-4ebe-8f28-092c8e9c9b11@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 10:37 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:
"Virgil" <Vir...@com.com> wrote in message
The fact that he has a criminal record would indicate that he has
no
regard for what is legal or not legal.
I have no criminal record or records at all.
The only record of any crime associated with me is DISCLAIMED by
the
publisher of such record(s).
It is only the URL postings that carries a disclaimer.
Did it say that?
And, acpass doesn't have a url?
It is perfectly possible to get a certified copy of any such court
records which are not disclaimed at all. But it costs money to get
them.
It isn't even releasable information to any party that has no lawful
interest in them.
According to what law?
According to so many laws that you are seen as ignorant by asking.
How about the law allowing public access to government records?
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
Or are JDW's convictions a military secret?
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
That much is so simple to understand, taxation against the taxpayer type,
that you even asking me shows you are NOT for the law or the government.
And, it also shows that you don't want the people to know about your crimes
that you consider to me privileged to be kept secret as if you are in some
military that has warred against the people of the United States of America
and its Constitution.
Your leader is DEAD, FOOL!
If you do not dissociate yourself from your leader, DEEPTHROAT, you will
join him very soon.
I'm no roevwade, deepthroat took down the president fraudulent scumbag
treasonist such as yourself.
I know the rule, and I am against you and your ilk's rebellion with extreme
prejudice.
Either learn how to behave or expect to be disciplined by minds and people
such as me and continue to be berated as the loser you have already shown
yourself to be.
Your ignorance of the law is not an excuse for you to continue violating it
or for you to lie after you committed a crime against another person.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
14 Dec 2007 01:56:33 AM |
|
|
In article <fIl8j.28203$mb.23496@bignews9.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-51A28E.14053313122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <Tpe8j.27967$mb.16002@bignews9.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7d40275c-4543-4ebe-8f28-092c8e9c9b11@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 10:37 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:
"Virgil" <Vir...@com.com> wrote in message
The fact that he has a criminal record would indicate that he has
no
regard for what is legal or not legal.
I have no criminal record or records at all.
The only record of any crime associated with me is DISCLAIMED by
the
publisher of such record(s).
It is only the URL postings that carries a disclaimer.
Did it say that?
And, acpass doesn't have a url?
It is perfectly possible to get a certified copy of any such court
records which are not disclaimed at all. But it costs money to get
them.
It isn't even releasable information to any party that has no lawful
interest in them.
According to what law?
According to so many laws that you are seen as ignorant by asking.
How about the law allowing public access to government records?
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
The federal law applies to all state records as well.
Or are JDW's convictions a military secret?
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
The federal law applies to all state records as well.
So anyone who wants to pony up the fees involved can get certified
copies of all records of JDW's brushes with the law.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
14 Dec 2007 06:58:27 AM |
|
|
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-906CAE.00563314122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <fIl8j.28203$mb.23496@bignews9.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
The federal law applies to all state records as well.
Wrong, idiot.
You forgot to read the Xth Amendment.
Your criminal espionage game is doomed.
Roevwade is a big enemy of the USA.
Your cowardice is your fault.
You get no privilege to investigate anyone other than yourself.
Every time you investigate me you open up the chamber that provides me with
the4 equal privilege of investigating you.
It really does.
And, you have no idea how hot I am when it comes to eradicating losers who
think they have some ability to violate the law by sticking their nose into
matters where it doesn't belong.
Expect the espionage tactics you employ to come back on you via massive
scrutiny that comes from the constituional begging the question rule.
When you violate the privacy rights of the people, the people automatically
get to violate yours.
You're fighting a losing battle.
You're criminal.
Or are JDW's convictions a military secret?
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
The federal law applies to all state records as well.
You're still a loser who knows nothing of representative government.
So anyone who wants to pony up the fees involved can get certified
copies of all records of JDW's brushes with the law.
Cowardboy Virgil is begging for someone other then himself to cough up cash
and to try something he is afraid to try himself.
He's afraid to do yeoman's work because he doesn't want to expose himself as
the fool he is.
What's he hiding?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
14 Dec 2007 06:14:07 PM |
|
|
In article <26v8j.42710$K27.19352@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-906CAE.00563314122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <fIl8j.28203$mb.23496@bignews9.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
The federal law applies to all state records as well.
Wrong, idiot.
Okay, so it is http://www.scstatehouse.net/code/t30c004.htm not the
fed law which allows virtually anyone to get your SC records.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
14 Dec 2007 07:00:03 PM |
|
|
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-D957D1.17140714122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <26v8j.42710$K27.19352@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-906CAE.00563314122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <fIl8j.28203$mb.23496@bignews9.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
The federal law applies to all state records as well.
Wrong, idiot.
Okay, so it is http://www.scstatehouse.net/code/t30c004.htm not the
fed law which allows virtually anyone to get your SC records.
They are accomplices to identity theft then.
They are not allowed to make information about the people of SC available to
persons outside of SC.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
14 Dec 2007 10:42:57 PM |
|
|
In article <DGF8j.20763$vt2.6223@bignews8.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-D957D1.17140714122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <26v8j.42710$K27.19352@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-906CAE.00563314122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <fIl8j.28203$mb.23496@bignews9.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
The federal law applies to all state records as well.
Wrong, idiot.
Okay, so it is http://www.scstatehouse.net/code/t30c004.htm not the
fed law which allows virtually anyone to get your SC records.
They are accomplices to identity theft then.
No thief in his right mind steal take JDW's identity when it is so easy
to get ones without any criminal record.
They are not allowed to make information about the people of SC available to
persons outside of SC.
But SC lawyers can do it for us.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated'Hippocratic Oath |
13 Dec 2007 08:37:35 PM |
|
|
On Dec 13, 9:16 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Vir...@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-51A28E.14053313122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <Tpe8j.27967$mb.16...@bignews9.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7d40275c-4543-4ebe-8f28-092c8e9c9b11@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 10:37 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:
"Virgil" <Vir...@com.com> wrote in message
The fact that he has a criminal record would indicate that he has
no
regard for what is legal or not legal.
I have no criminal record or records at all.
The only record of any crime associated with me is DISCLAIMED by
the
publisher of such record(s).
It is only the URL postings that carries a disclaimer.
Did it say that?
And, acpass doesn't have a url?
It is perfectly possible to get a certified copy of any such court
records which are not disclaimed at all. But it costs money to get
them.
It isn't even releasable information to any party that has no lawful
interest in them.
According to what law?
According to so many laws that you are seen as ignorant by asking.
How about the law allowing public access to government records?
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
And you've been talking elsewhere about others' literacy? Plural not
possessive, please.
Or are JDW's convictions a military secret?
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
That much is so simple to understand, taxation against the taxpayer type,
that you even asking me shows you are NOT for the law or the government.
And, it also shows that you don't want the people to know about your crimes
that you consider to me privileged to be kept secret as if you are in some
military that has warred against the people of the United States of America
and its Constitution.
How come you religious morons always come crying back to the US
Constitution whenever you percieve a threat to your liberty? You
people spend countless hours trying to claim it doesn't say what it
does, and then when you need it you say "..ooh! Duh CONSTITUTION sez
so!" like you actually know what's in it.
Your leader is DEAD, FOOL!
If you do not dissociate yourself from your leader, DEEPTHROAT, you will
join him very soon.
I'm no roevwade, deepthroat took down the president fraudulent scumbag
treasonist such as yourself.
I know the rule, and I am against you and your ilk's rebellion with extreme
prejudice.
Either learn how to behave or expect to be disciplined by minds and people
such as me
You mean illiterate morons?
and continue to be berated as the loser you have already shown
yourself to be.
Your ignorance of the law is not an excuse for you to continue violating it
or for you to lie after you committed a crime against another person.
Virgil, I wonder if we should buy that paper copy after all...<g>
-PF
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
13 Dec 2007 09:55:03 PM |
|
|
<panamfloyd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ce10438-da8f-42f7-927c-d413ae4096d4@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 13, 9:16 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Vir...@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-51A28E.14053313122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <Tpe8j.27967$mb.16...@bignews9.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"Pr0r3p" <pr0...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7d40275c-4543-4ebe-8f28-092c8e9c9b11@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 12, 10:37 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com>
wrote:
"Virgil" <Vir...@com.com> wrote in message
The fact that he has a criminal record would indicate that he
has
no
regard for what is legal or not legal.
I have no criminal record or records at all.
The only record of any crime associated with me is DISCLAIMED by
the
publisher of such record(s).
It is only the URL postings that carries a disclaimer.
Did it say that?
And, acpass doesn't have a url?
It is perfectly possible to get a certified copy of any such
court
records which are not disclaimed at all. But it costs money to
get
them.
It isn't even releasable information to any party that has no
lawful
interest in them.
According to what law?
According to so many laws that you are seen as ignorant by asking.
How about the law allowing public access to government records?
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
And you've been talking elsewhere about others' literacy? Plural not
possessive, please.
It is still possessive case.
Possessive plural..
Or are JDW's convictions a military secret?
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
That much is so simple to understand, taxation against the taxpayer type,
that you even asking me shows you are NOT for the law or the government.
And, it also shows that you don't want the people to know about your
crimes
that you consider to me privileged to be kept secret as if you are in
some
military that has warred against the people of the United States of
America
and its Constitution.
How come you religious morons always come crying back to the US
Constitution whenever you percieve a threat to your liberty?
Now you go and bring religion into it like a wimp.
You people spend countless hours trying to claim it doesn't say what it
does,
Wrong.
and then when you need it you say "..ooh! Duh CONSTITUTION sez
so!" like you actually know what's in it.
Of course I know what is in the Constitution.
Look at my educaitonal background.
The Constitution is easy to understand.
It's deceiving loons such as yourself that don't understand it who then lie
to deny the people their rights at law.
Your leader is DEAD, FOOL!
If you do not dissociate yourself from your leader, DEEPTHROAT, you will
join him very soon.
I'm no roevwade, deepthroat took down the president fraudulent scumbag
treasonist such as yourself.
I know the rule, and I am against you and your ilk's rebellion with
extreme
prejudice.
Either learn how to behave or expect to be disciplined by minds and
people
such as me
You mean illiterate morons?
What should we call them?
Ignorant law breakers maybe?
and continue to be berated as the loser you have already shown
yourself to be.
Your ignorance of the law is not an excuse for you to continue violating
it
or for you to lie after you committed a crime against another person.
Virgil, I wonder if we should buy that paper copy after all...<g>
Plan B wasn't good enough?
Gotta go with Plan C?
Forgery time?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
14 Dec 2007 02:06:35 AM |
|
|
In article <E8n8j.37797$L%6.1621@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
<panamfloyd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ce10438-da8f-42f7-927c-d413ae4096d4@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 13, 9:16 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Vir...@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-51A28E.14053313122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
It isn't even releasable information to any party that has no
lawful
interest in them.
According to what law?
According to so many laws that you are seen as ignorant by asking.
How about the law allowing public access to government records?
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
But they are when asked, according to federal law!
Of course I know what is in the Constitution.
Then why do you misrepresent it so badly?
Look at my educaitonal background.
Look at his spelling!
The Constitution is easy to understand.
If it were all that easy, we wouldn't need SCOTUS to sort it out for us.
Virgil, I wonder if we should buy that paper copy after all...<g>
Plan B wasn't good enough?
Gotta go with Plan C?
Forgery time?
No need to forge what SC courts will cough up for us, the details of
JDW's one conviction and 3 indictments.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
14 Dec 2007 06:52:00 AM |
|
|
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-6641D6.01063514122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <E8n8j.37797$L%6.1621@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
<panamfloyd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ce10438-da8f-42f7-927c-d413ae4096d4@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 13, 9:16 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Vir...@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-51A28E.14053313122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
It isn't even releasable information to any party that has no
lawful
interest in them.
According to what law?
According to so many laws that you are seen as ignorant by asking.
How about the law allowing public access to government records?
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
But they are when asked, according to federal law!
Not so, you idiot.
You have no legal right to view records of persons outside your area of
entitlement.
Representative government is your enemy.
Of course I know what is in the Constitution.
Then why do you misrepresent it so badly?
I don't, you disrespectful espionage criminal.
Look at my educational background.
Look at his spelling!
Spelling champions are those Virgil likes to attack.
The Constitution is easy to understand.
If it were all that easy, we wouldn't need SCOTUS to sort it out for us.
Virgil, an illiterate espionage sort, needs his hand held in the USA.
Shows him to be the inept, illiterate he is.
Virgil, I wonder if we should buy that paper copy after all...<g>
Plan B wasn't good enough?
Gotta go with Plan C?
Forgery time?
No need to forge what SC courts will cough up for us,
What you gonna do when they tell you that you are not entitled to any
records concerning any person in SC?
You going to pitch a fit and threaten them?
I like seeing you FOOLS expose yourself so readily.
You're on a watchlist, you idiot.
Anyone who breaks the law against me is guilty of the crime(s) they commit
against me.
the details of JDW's one conviction and 3 indictments.
What conviction?
What 3 indictments?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
14 Dec 2007 06:11:04 PM |
|
|
In article <%%u8j.42706$K27.17142@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-6641D6.01063514122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <E8n8j.37797$L%6.1621@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
But they are when asked
Not so, you idiot.
You have no legal right to view records of persons outside your area of
entitlement.
That's not what
http://www.scstatehouse.net/code/t30c004.htm
says.
Representative government is your enemy.
Of course I know what is in the Constitution.
Then why do you misrepresent it so badly?
I don't, you disrespectful espionage criminal.
Look at my educational background.
Look at his spelling!
Spelling champions are those Virgil likes to attack.
The Constitution is easy to understand.
If it were all that easy, we wouldn't need SCOTUS to sort it out for us.
Virgil, an illiterate espionage sort, needs his hand held in the USA.
Shows him to be the inept, illiterate he is.
Plan B wasn't good enough?
Gotta go with Plan C?
Forgery time?
No need to forge what SC courts will cough up for us,
What you gonna do when they tell you that you are not entitled to any
records concerning any person in SC?
That's not what it says in http://www.scstatehouse.net/code/t30c004.htm
What conviction?
What 3 indictments?
The ones in your records.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
14 Dec 2007 04:23:42 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:52:00 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, "John D.
Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Virgil@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-6641D6.01063514122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <E8n8j.37797$L%6.1621@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
<panamfloyd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ce10438-da8f-42f7-927c-d413ae4096d4@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 13, 9:16 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessio...@msn.com> wrote:
"Virgil" <Vir...@com.com> wrote in message
news:Virgil-51A28E.14053313122007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
It isn't even releasable information to any party that has no
lawful
interest in them.
According to what law?
According to so many laws that you are seen as ignorant by asking.
How about the law allowing public access to government records?
The government's are NOT in business to serve persons not of their
jurisdictions.
But they are when asked, according to federal law!
Not so, you idiot.
You have no legal right to view records of persons outside your area of
entitlement.
Representative government is your enemy.
Of course I know what is in the Constitution.
Then why do you misrepresent it so badly?
I don't, you disrespectful espionage criminal.
Look at my educational background.
Look at his spelling!
Spelling champions are those Virgil likes to attack.
The Constitution is easy to understand.
If it were all that easy, we wouldn't need SCOTUS to sort it out for us.
Virgil, an illiterate espionage sort, needs his hand held in the USA.
Shows him to be the inept, illiterate he is.
Virgil, I wonder if we should buy that paper copy after all...<g>
Plan B wasn't good enough?
Gotta go with Plan C?
Forgery time?
No need to forge what SC courts will cough up for us,
What you gonna do when they tell you that you are not entitled to any
records concerning any person in SC?
Public Records, Johnny. Belonging to the public. open records are
just that open to the public.
You going to pitch a fit and threaten them?
FOIA request.
I like seeing you FOOLS expose yourself so readily.
Didn't you get convicted of indecent exposure?
You're on a watchlist, you idiot.
Gee, you think so?
Anyone who breaks the law against me is guilty of the crime(s) they commit
against me.
No one has broke a law. you did when you "failed to cooperate" with a
LEO during the "investigation of crime". You obstructed the
investigation of a crime when you answered the LEOs question with
"Are you Gay?".
the details of JDW's one conviction and 3 indictments.
What conviction?
What 3 indictments?
Do you want someone to get the hard copies of your file, scan them
and post them to a web space?
It has been done before.
--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
14 Dec 2007 04:47:52 PM |
|
|
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message
news:2906m3hsn2cfc9o31123lkv31lmds6t8it@4ax.com...
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:52:00 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, "John D.
Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
What you gonna do when they tell you that you are not entitled to any
records concerning any person in SC?
Public Records, Johnny. Belonging to the public. open records are
just that open to the public.
You are not a member of the public those records concern, YOU IGNORANT TRIPE
SEPWER.
You going to pitch a fit and threaten them?
FOIA request.
Like wasting your money?
And, they have no legal obligation to honor such a request from outside the
state of sc.
Their job is to protect the public from criminal idiots such as yourself.
I like seeing you FOOLS expose yourself so readily.
You're on a watchlist, you idiot.
Gee, you think so?
Yes. Sure do.
That's why you act so stupid.
Anyone who breaks the law against me is guilty of the crime(s) they commit
against me.
No one has broke a law.
Liar.
you did when you "failed to cooperate" with a
LEO during the "investigation of crime".
Never occurred.
You obstructed the investigation of a crime when you answered the LEOs
question with
"Are you Gay?".
You are a GOD DAMNED LIAR!
the details of JDW's one conviction and 3 indictments.
What conviction?
What 3 indictments?
Do you want someone to get the hard copies of your file, scan them
and post them to a web space?
Do you think that will aid you or your GOD DAMNED friends?
It has been done before.
Wasting your time and money is your own choice.
And, guess what, YOU IDIOT!
Since you like to play like a GOD DAMNED ***** against me, you would cause
even MORE GUILT to be on the shoulders of the government that is OBLIGATED
to HONOR THE LAW IN MY FAVOR!
They haven't provided me with hard copies of all those things, YOU FOOL!
What you got to say about that?
I AM SICK OF YOU GOD DAMNED CRIMINALS HARASSING ME!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: From Progressive Europe: Italian Doctors Want To Scrap 'Outdated' Hippocratic Oath |
14 Dec 2007 06:38:32 PM |
|
|
In article <HKD8j.20695$vt2.9522@bignews8.bellsouth.net>,
"John D. Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message
news:2906m3hsn2cfc9o31123lkv31lmds6t8it@4ax.com...
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:52:00 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, "John D.
Wentzky" <wxpprofessional@msn.com> wrote:
What you gonna do when they tell you that you are not entitled to any
records concerning any person in SC?
Public Records, Johnny. Belonging to the public. open records are
just that open to the public.
You are not a member of the public those records concern, YOU IGNORANT TRIPE
SEPWER.
All anyone need do is to hire an SC lawyer to get the records for him.
And SC Freedom of Information Act will open up those records for that
lawyer and thus, for anybody at all.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
