Religions > Atheism > It's time to start taking the theocrats serioulsy Tell A Friend
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
02 Nov 2005 09:43:07 PM |
| Object: |
It's time to start taking the theocrats serioulsy Tell A Friend |
IT'S TIME TO START TAKING THE THEOCRATS SERIOUSLY Tell A Friend
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_randolph_051102_it_s_time_to_start_t.htm
IT'S TIME TO START TAKING THE THEOCRATS SERIOUSLY
Tell A Friend
by Randolph T. Holhut
http://www.opednews.com
DUMMERSTON, Vt. — The nexus of evangelical Christianity and Republican
politics is a force that is transforming the United States, and not
for the better.
As someone who firmly believes that church and state should be
separate entities, I find it disgusting that GOP, in the minds of some
Republicans, now stands for God's Own Party.
This implies, of course, that Democrats are tools of Satan.
But the biggest question I have regarding Christian Republicans is how
does one claim to be a good Christian and still follow a political
party that is very selective about which parts of the Bible it follows?
The answer might be found in a recently-released documentary,
"Theologians Under Hitler," produced by Methodist Pastor Steven
Martin. It will be aired on public television in the coming weeks.
The film is based on the 1985 book of the same name by Robert
Ericksen. It looks at three prominent German Protestant theologians —
Gerhard Kittel, Paul Althaus and Emmanuel Hirsch — and how their
writings were used to legitimize the Nazi Party during its rise to
power in the 1920s and 1930s.
In an interview in June, Martin said he hopes the film "opens up the
discussion to talk about what it means to be uniquely Christian in the
world today. And I think that is the most crucial discussion we can
have today in the church."
That's because, as Martin put it, "pastors are trying to lead some
civil discussion of Christianity in context of a divided country and
what it means to be a Christian in context of a divided society. This
program gives you a very safe environment to do it."
While discussing current events from the pulpit is problematic, Martin
said "you can talk about history."
And this is history worth discussing. To talk about how German
churches helped Adolf Hitler come to power, you have to talk about how
church and state became one in Germany.
In the aftermath of World War I, when Germany was a beaten, exhausted
nation, a new vision of Christianity started to emerge. It was a
vision that championed a nationalist agenda. The idea of the
resurrection of Germany merged with the image of the resurrection of
Christ. It was a seductive image, especially when one considers the
depth of Christian faith in Germany and its attractiveness as a
antidote to a chaotic modern world.
The German Christian movement was the result. The Nazi swastika
started to appear on church altars. The idea of volk espoused by
Hirsch — a united, racially pure Germany — tapped into the
long-simmering anti-semitism of Germans. It didn't take much of a leap
to equate the elimination of Jews with the fulfillment of God's plan.
What made it possible was theologians such as Kittel, who advocated
for a Christianity divorced from its Jewish roots, or Althaus, who
linked Hirsch's volk and Hitler's ideas together in his writings.
Given the respect that people have for church leaders, having people
like Kittel, Althaus and Hirsch supporting Hitler made Nazism respectable.
Martin's film doesn't mention present-day politics. It doesn't need
to. A viewer of the film with even the slightest bit of knowledge
regarding today's Republican Party can see how the combination of
church and state perverts both church and state.
Radical clerics such as Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and James Dobson
certainly don't have the intellectual status of an Althaus or Hirsch.
But they most certainly are influencing political thought as their
German counterparts did in the 1930s. They have succeeded in making
their version of evangelical Christianity as the official religion of
the Republican Party. All other faiths need not apply. They want a
theocracy, one volk under one churchified state.
That's why the Founding Fathers made sure separation of church and
state was put into the Constitution. They had enough knowledge of the
religious extremists of their era to know that no faith or religious
sect should be allowed to dominate a free people.
But the present-day Christian Right doesn't see it that way. Like the
German church of the 1930s, they see our open, secular society and the
principles of the Enlightenment it was based upon as evil, and see the
people who believe in these principles as evil.
Too many liberals don't take the prospect of a fundamentalist
theocracy seriously, or think that the Christian Right and its
followers can reasoned with. Unfortunately, reason is an impossibility
when dealing with people who openly seek your destruction in the name
of the God they believe in.
This nation is lurching toward theocracy and we need to understand
what happens when church and state become one. The evangelicals who
believe that God chose George W. Bush to be president will probably
not see Martin's film. But for everyone else who believes that
religion and politics shouldn't mix, especially in light of what
happens when they do, this film is a must. More information about
"Theologians Under Hitler" can be found at www.vitalvisuals.com.
Randolph T. Holhut has been a journalist in New England for more than
25 years. He edited "The George Seldes Reader" (Barricade Books). He
*****************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: It's time to start taking the theocrats serioulsy Tell A Friend |
03 Nov 2005 01:29:35 AM |
|
|
wrote:
IT'S TIME TO START TAKING THE THEOCRATS SERIOUSLY Tell A Friend
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_randolph_051102_it_s_time_to_star=
t_t.htm
IT'S TIME TO START TAKING THE THEOCRATS SERIOUSLY
Tell A Friend
by Randolph T. Holhut
http://www.opednews.com
DUMMERSTON, Vt. - The nexus of evangelical Christianity and Republican
politics is a force that is transforming the United States, and not
for the better.
As someone who firmly believes that church and state should be
separate entities, I find it disgusting that GOP, in the minds of some
Republicans, now stands for God's Own Party.
That is right. It is GOD OWN PARTY for the better
of America.
You find this disgusting? You filthy little Demon-craps
good for nothing...
This implies, of course, that Democrats are tools of Satan.
But the biggest question I have regarding Christian Republicans is how
does one claim to be a good Christian and still follow a political
party that is very selective about which parts of the Bible it follows?
The answer might be found in a recently-released documentary,
"Theologians Under Hitler," produced by Methodist Pastor Steven
Martin. It will be aired on public television in the coming weeks.
The film is based on the 1985 book of the same name by Robert
Ericksen. It looks at three prominent German Protestant theologians -
Gerhard Kittel, Paul Althaus and Emmanuel Hirsch - and how their
writings were used to legitimize the Nazi Party during its rise to
power in the 1920s and 1930s.
In an interview in June, Martin said he hopes the film "opens up the
discussion to talk about what it means to be uniquely Christian in the
world today. And I think that is the most crucial discussion we can
have today in the church."
That's because, as Martin put it, "pastors are trying to lead some
civil discussion of Christianity in context of a divided country and
what it means to be a Christian in context of a divided society. This
program gives you a very safe environment to do it."
While discussing current events from the pulpit is problematic, Martin
said "you can talk about history."
And this is history worth discussing. To talk about how German
churches helped Adolf Hitler come to power, you have to talk about how
church and state became one in Germany.
In the aftermath of World War I, when Germany was a beaten, exhausted
nation, a new vision of Christianity started to emerge. It was a
vision that championed a nationalist agenda. The idea of the
resurrection of Germany merged with the image of the resurrection of
Christ. It was a seductive image, especially when one considers the
depth of Christian faith in Germany and its attractiveness as a
antidote to a chaotic modern world.
The German Christian movement was the result. The Nazi swastika
started to appear on church altars. The idea of volk espoused by
Hirsch - a united, racially pure Germany - tapped into the
long-simmering anti-semitism of Germans. It didn't take much of a leap
to equate the elimination of Jews with the fulfillment of God's plan.
What made it possible was theologians such as Kittel, who advocated
for a Christianity divorced from its Jewish roots, or Althaus, who
linked Hirsch's volk and Hitler's ideas together in his writings.
Given the respect that people have for church leaders, having people
like Kittel, Althaus and Hirsch supporting Hitler made Nazism respectable.
Martin's film doesn't mention present-day politics. It doesn't need
to. A viewer of the film with even the slightest bit of knowledge
regarding today's Republican Party can see how the combination of
church and state perverts both church and state.
Radical clerics such as Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and James Dobson
certainly don't have the intellectual status of an Althaus or Hirsch.
But they most certainly are influencing political thought as their
German counterparts did in the 1930s. They have succeeded in making
their version of evangelical Christianity as the official religion of
the Republican Party. All other faiths need not apply. They want a
theocracy, one volk under one churchified state.
That's why the Founding Fathers made sure separation of church and
state was put into the Constitution. They had enough knowledge of the
religious extremists of their era to know that no faith or religious
sect should be allowed to dominate a free people.
But the present-day Christian Right doesn't see it that way. Like the
German church of the 1930s, they see our open, secular society and the
principles of the Enlightenment it was based upon as evil, and see the
people who believe in these principles as evil.
Too many liberals don't take the prospect of a fundamentalist
theocracy seriously, or think that the Christian Right and its
followers can reasoned with. Unfortunately, reason is an impossibility
when dealing with people who openly seek your destruction in the name
of the God they believe in.
This nation is lurching toward theocracy and we need to understand
what happens when church and state become one. The evangelicals who
believe that God chose George W. Bush to be president will probably
not see Martin's film. But for everyone else who believes that
religion and politics shouldn't mix, especially in light of what
happens when they do, this film is a must. More information about
"Theologians Under Hitler" can be found at www.vitalvisuals.com.
Randolph T. Holhut has been a journalist in New England for more than
25 years. He edited "The George Seldes Reader" (Barricade Books). He
*****************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS =B7 Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why =
"a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisne=
r,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: It's time to start taking the theocrats serioulsy Tell A Friend |
03 Nov 2005 10:47:08 AM |
|
|
wrote:
:|buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:
:|> IT'S TIME TO START TAKING THE THEOCRATS SERIOUSLY Tell A Friend
:|> http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_randolph_051102_it_s_time_to_start_t.htm
:|>
:|> IT'S TIME TO START TAKING THE THEOCRATS SERIOUSLY
:|> Tell A Friend
:|>
:|> by Randolph T. Holhut
:|>
:|> http://www.opednews.com
:|>
:|> DUMMERSTON, Vt. - The nexus of evangelical Christianity and Republican
:|> politics is a force that is transforming the United States, and not
:|> for the better.
:|> As someone who firmly believes that church and state should be
:|> separate entities, I find it disgusting that GOP, in the minds of some
:|> Republicans, now stands for God's Own Party.
:|
:|
:| That is right. It is GOD OWN PARTY for the better
:| of America.
:| You find this disgusting? You filthy little Demon-craps
:| good for nothing...
:|
Hehehehe, you are a real trip LOL
:|> This implies, of course, that Democrats are tools of Satan.
:|> But the biggest question I have regarding Christian Republicans is how
:|> does one claim to be a good Christian and still follow a political
:|> party that is very selective about which parts of the Bible it follows?
:|>
:|> The answer might be found in a recently-released documentary,
:|> "Theologians Under Hitler," produced by Methodist Pastor Steven
:|> Martin. It will be aired on public television in the coming weeks.
:|> The film is based on the 1985 book of the same name by Robert
:|> Ericksen. It looks at three prominent German Protestant theologians -
:|> Gerhard Kittel, Paul Althaus and Emmanuel Hirsch - and how their
:|> writings were used to legitimize the Nazi Party during its rise to
:|> power in the 1920s and 1930s.
:|> In an interview in June, Martin said he hopes the film "opens up the
:|> discussion to talk about what it means to be uniquely Christian in the
:|> world today. And I think that is the most crucial discussion we can
:|> have today in the church."
:|>
:|> That's because, as Martin put it, "pastors are trying to lead some
:|> civil discussion of Christianity in context of a divided country and
:|> what it means to be a Christian in context of a divided society. This
:|> program gives you a very safe environment to do it."
:|> While discussing current events from the pulpit is problematic, Martin
:|> said "you can talk about history."
:|>
:|> And this is history worth discussing. To talk about how German
:|> churches helped Adolf Hitler come to power, you have to talk about how
:|> church and state became one in Germany.
:|>
:|> In the aftermath of World War I, when Germany was a beaten, exhausted
:|> nation, a new vision of Christianity started to emerge. It was a
:|> vision that championed a nationalist agenda. The idea of the
:|> resurrection of Germany merged with the image of the resurrection of
:|> Christ. It was a seductive image, especially when one considers the
:|> depth of Christian faith in Germany and its attractiveness as a
:|> antidote to a chaotic modern world.
:|>
:|> The German Christian movement was the result. The Nazi swastika
:|> started to appear on church altars. The idea of volk espoused by
:|> Hirsch - a united, racially pure Germany - tapped into the
:|> long-simmering anti-semitism of Germans. It didn't take much of a leap
:|> to equate the elimination of Jews with the fulfillment of God's plan.
:|> What made it possible was theologians such as Kittel, who advocated
:|> for a Christianity divorced from its Jewish roots, or Althaus, who
:|> linked Hirsch's volk and Hitler's ideas together in his writings.
:|> Given the respect that people have for church leaders, having people
:|> like Kittel, Althaus and Hirsch supporting Hitler made Nazism respectable.
:|>
:|> Martin's film doesn't mention present-day politics. It doesn't need
:|> to. A viewer of the film with even the slightest bit of knowledge
:|> regarding today's Republican Party can see how the combination of
:|> church and state perverts both church and state.
:|>
:|> Radical clerics such as Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and James Dobson
:|> certainly don't have the intellectual status of an Althaus or Hirsch.
:|> But they most certainly are influencing political thought as their
:|> German counterparts did in the 1930s. They have succeeded in making
:|> their version of evangelical Christianity as the official religion of
:|> the Republican Party. All other faiths need not apply. They want a
:|> theocracy, one volk under one churchified state.
:|>
:|> That's why the Founding Fathers made sure separation of church and
:|> state was put into the Constitution. They had enough knowledge of the
:|> religious extremists of their era to know that no faith or religious
:|> sect should be allowed to dominate a free people.
:|>
:|> But the present-day Christian Right doesn't see it that way. Like the
:|> German church of the 1930s, they see our open, secular society and the
:|> principles of the Enlightenment it was based upon as evil, and see the
:|> people who believe in these principles as evil.
:|>
:|> Too many liberals don't take the prospect of a fundamentalist
:|> theocracy seriously, or think that the Christian Right and its
:|> followers can reasoned with. Unfortunately, reason is an impossibility
:|> when dealing with people who openly seek your destruction in the name
:|> of the God they believe in.
:|>
:|> This nation is lurching toward theocracy and we need to understand
:|> what happens when church and state become one. The evangelicals who
:|> believe that God chose George W. Bush to be president will probably
:|> not see Martin's film. But for everyone else who believes that
:|> religion and politics shouldn't mix, especially in light of what
:|> happens when they do, this film is a must. More information about
:|> "Theologians Under Hitler" can be found at www.vitalvisuals.com.
:|>
:|> Randolph T. Holhut has been a journalist in New England for more than
:|> 25 years. He edited "The George Seldes Reader" (Barricade Books). He
:|>
:|> *****************************************************************
:|> Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
:|>
:|> You are invited to check out the following:
:|>
:|> The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
:|>
:|> American Theocrats - Past and Present
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
:|>
:|> The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
:|>
:|> [and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
:|> Church and State in general, listed below]
:|>
:|> HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
:|> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
:|>
:|> [Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
:|> all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
:|>
:|> ***************************************************************
:|> . . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
:|> respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
:|> take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
:|> page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
:|> 256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
:|> Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
:|> . . .
:|> ****************************************************************
:|> THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
:|> SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
:|>
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
:|> ****************************************************************
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: It's time to start taking the theocrats serioulsy Tell A Friend |
02 Nov 2005 10:22:19 PM |
|
|
Maybe if you fucking morons started taking Islamofascism seriously, the
world would be a safer place.
buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:
IT'S TIME TO START TAKING THE THEOCRATS SERIOUSLY Tell A Friend
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_randolph_051102_it_s_time_to_star=
t_t.htm
IT'S TIME TO START TAKING THE THEOCRATS SERIOUSLY
Tell A Friend
by Randolph T. Holhut
http://www.opednews.com
DUMMERSTON, Vt. - The nexus of evangelical Christianity and Republican
politics is a force that is transforming the United States, and not
for the better.
As someone who firmly believes that church and state should be
separate entities, I find it disgusting that GOP, in the minds of some
Republicans, now stands for God's Own Party.
This implies, of course, that Democrats are tools of Satan.
But the biggest question I have regarding Christian Republicans is how
does one claim to be a good Christian and still follow a political
party that is very selective about which parts of the Bible it follows?
The answer might be found in a recently-released documentary,
"Theologians Under Hitler," produced by Methodist Pastor Steven
Martin. It will be aired on public television in the coming weeks.
The film is based on the 1985 book of the same name by Robert
Ericksen. It looks at three prominent German Protestant theologians -
Gerhard Kittel, Paul Althaus and Emmanuel Hirsch - and how their
writings were used to legitimize the Nazi Party during its rise to
power in the 1920s and 1930s.
In an interview in June, Martin said he hopes the film "opens up the
discussion to talk about what it means to be uniquely Christian in the
world today. And I think that is the most crucial discussion we can
have today in the church."
That's because, as Martin put it, "pastors are trying to lead some
civil discussion of Christianity in context of a divided country and
what it means to be a Christian in context of a divided society. This
program gives you a very safe environment to do it."
While discussing current events from the pulpit is problematic, Martin
said "you can talk about history."
And this is history worth discussing. To talk about how German
churches helped Adolf Hitler come to power, you have to talk about how
church and state became one in Germany.
In the aftermath of World War I, when Germany was a beaten, exhausted
nation, a new vision of Christianity started to emerge. It was a
vision that championed a nationalist agenda. The idea of the
resurrection of Germany merged with the image of the resurrection of
Christ. It was a seductive image, especially when one considers the
depth of Christian faith in Germany and its attractiveness as a
antidote to a chaotic modern world.
The German Christian movement was the result. The Nazi swastika
started to appear on church altars. The idea of volk espoused by
Hirsch - a united, racially pure Germany - tapped into the
long-simmering anti-semitism of Germans. It didn't take much of a leap
to equate the elimination of Jews with the fulfillment of God's plan.
What made it possible was theologians such as Kittel, who advocated
for a Christianity divorced from its Jewish roots, or Althaus, who
linked Hirsch's volk and Hitler's ideas together in his writings.
Given the respect that people have for church leaders, having people
like Kittel, Althaus and Hirsch supporting Hitler made Nazism respectable.
Martin's film doesn't mention present-day politics. It doesn't need
to. A viewer of the film with even the slightest bit of knowledge
regarding today's Republican Party can see how the combination of
church and state perverts both church and state.
Radical clerics such as Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and James Dobson
certainly don't have the intellectual status of an Althaus or Hirsch.
But they most certainly are influencing political thought as their
German counterparts did in the 1930s. They have succeeded in making
their version of evangelical Christianity as the official religion of
the Republican Party. All other faiths need not apply. They want a
theocracy, one volk under one churchified state.
That's why the Founding Fathers made sure separation of church and
state was put into the Constitution. They had enough knowledge of the
religious extremists of their era to know that no faith or religious
sect should be allowed to dominate a free people.
But the present-day Christian Right doesn't see it that way. Like the
German church of the 1930s, they see our open, secular society and the
principles of the Enlightenment it was based upon as evil, and see the
people who believe in these principles as evil.
Too many liberals don't take the prospect of a fundamentalist
theocracy seriously, or think that the Christian Right and its
followers can reasoned with. Unfortunately, reason is an impossibility
when dealing with people who openly seek your destruction in the name
of the God they believe in.
This nation is lurching toward theocracy and we need to understand
what happens when church and state become one. The evangelicals who
believe that God chose George W. Bush to be president will probably
not see Martin's film. But for everyone else who believes that
religion and politics shouldn't mix, especially in light of what
happens when they do, this film is a must. More information about
"Theologians Under Hitler" can be found at www.vitalvisuals.com.
Randolph T. Holhut has been a journalist in New England for more than
25 years. He edited "The George Seldes Reader" (Barricade Books). He
*****************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS =B7 Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why =
"a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisne=
r,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: It's time to start taking the theocrats serioulsy Tell A Friend |
03 Nov 2005 10:44:53 AM |
|
|
wrote:
:|Maybe if you fucking morons started taking Islamofascism seriously, the
:|world would be a safer place.
:|
Think that would help, huh?
:|buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:
:|> IT'S TIME TO START TAKING THE THEOCRATS SERIOUSLY Tell A Friend
:|> http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_randolph_051102_it_s_time_to_start_t.htm
:|>
:|> IT'S TIME TO START TAKING THE THEOCRATS SERIOUSLY
:|> Tell A Friend
:|>
:|> by Randolph T. Holhut
:|>
:|> http://www.opednews.com
:|>
:|> DUMMERSTON, Vt. - The nexus of evangelical Christianity and Republican
:|> politics is a force that is transforming the United States, and not
:|> for the better.
:|> As someone who firmly believes that church and state should be
:|> separate entities, I find it disgusting that GOP, in the minds of some
:|> Republicans, now stands for God's Own Party.
:|> This implies, of course, that Democrats are tools of Satan.
:|> But the biggest question I have regarding Christian Republicans is how
:|> does one claim to be a good Christian and still follow a political
:|> party that is very selective about which parts of the Bible it follows?
:|>
:|> The answer might be found in a recently-released documentary,
:|> "Theologians Under Hitler," produced by Methodist Pastor Steven
:|> Martin. It will be aired on public television in the coming weeks.
:|> The film is based on the 1985 book of the same name by Robert
:|> Ericksen. It looks at three prominent German Protestant theologians -
:|> Gerhard Kittel, Paul Althaus and Emmanuel Hirsch - and how their
:|> writings were used to legitimize the Nazi Party during its rise to
:|> power in the 1920s and 1930s.
:|> In an interview in June, Martin said he hopes the film "opens up the
:|> discussion to talk about what it means to be uniquely Christian in the
:|> world today. And I think that is the most crucial discussion we can
:|> have today in the church."
:|>
:|> That's because, as Martin put it, "pastors are trying to lead some
:|> civil discussion of Christianity in context of a divided country and
:|> what it means to be a Christian in context of a divided society. This
:|> program gives you a very safe environment to do it."
:|> While discussing current events from the pulpit is problematic, Martin
:|> said "you can talk about history."
:|>
:|> And this is history worth discussing. To talk about how German
:|> churches helped Adolf Hitler come to power, you have to talk about how
:|> church and state became one in Germany.
:|>
:|> In the aftermath of World War I, when Germany was a beaten, exhausted
:|> nation, a new vision of Christianity started to emerge. It was a
:|> vision that championed a nationalist agenda. The idea of the
:|> resurrection of Germany merged with the image of the resurrection of
:|> Christ. It was a seductive image, especially when one considers the
:|> depth of Christian faith in Germany and its attractiveness as a
:|> antidote to a chaotic modern world.
:|>
:|> The German Christian movement was the result. The Nazi swastika
:|> started to appear on church altars. The idea of volk espoused by
:|> Hirsch - a united, racially pure Germany - tapped into the
:|> long-simmering anti-semitism of Germans. It didn't take much of a leap
:|> to equate the elimination of Jews with the fulfillment of God's plan.
:|> What made it possible was theologians such as Kittel, who advocated
:|> for a Christianity divorced from its Jewish roots, or Althaus, who
:|> linked Hirsch's volk and Hitler's ideas together in his writings.
:|> Given the respect that people have for church leaders, having people
:|> like Kittel, Althaus and Hirsch supporting Hitler made Nazism respectable.
:|>
:|> Martin's film doesn't mention present-day politics. It doesn't need
:|> to. A viewer of the film with even the slightest bit of knowledge
:|> regarding today's Republican Party can see how the combination of
:|> church and state perverts both church and state.
:|>
:|> Radical clerics such as Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and James Dobson
:|> certainly don't have the intellectual status of an Althaus or Hirsch.
:|> But they most certainly are influencing political thought as their
:|> German counterparts did in the 1930s. They have succeeded in making
:|> their version of evangelical Christianity as the official religion of
:|> the Republican Party. All other faiths need not apply. They want a
:|> theocracy, one volk under one churchified state.
:|>
:|> That's why the Founding Fathers made sure separation of church and
:|> state was put into the Constitution. They had enough knowledge of the
:|> religious extremists of their era to know that no faith or religious
:|> sect should be allowed to dominate a free people.
:|>
:|> But the present-day Christian Right doesn't see it that way. Like the
:|> German church of the 1930s, they see our open, secular society and the
:|> principles of the Enlightenment it was based upon as evil, and see the
:|> people who believe in these principles as evil.
:|>
:|> Too many liberals don't take the prospect of a fundamentalist
:|> theocracy seriously, or think that the Christian Right and its
:|> followers can reasoned with. Unfortunately, reason is an impossibility
:|> when dealing with people who openly seek your destruction in the name
:|> of the God they believe in.
:|>
:|> This nation is lurching toward theocracy and we need to understand
:|> what happens when church and state become one. The evangelicals who
:|> believe that God chose George W. Bush to be president will probably
:|> not see Martin's film. But for everyone else who believes that
:|> religion and politics shouldn't mix, especially in light of what
:|> happens when they do, this film is a must. More information about
:|> "Theologians Under Hitler" can be found at www.vitalvisuals.com.
:|>
:|> Randolph T. Holhut has been a journalist in New England for more than
:|> 25 years. He edited "The George Seldes Reader" (Barricade Books). He
:|>
:|> *****************************************************************
:|> Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
:|>
:|> You are invited to check out the following:
:|>
:|> The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
:|>
:|> American Theocrats - Past and Present
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
:|>
:|> The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
:|>
:|> [and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
:|> Church and State in general, listed below]
:|>
:|> HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
:|> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
:|>
:|> [Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
:|> all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
:|>
:|> ***************************************************************
:|> . . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
:|> respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
:|> take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
:|> page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
:|> 256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
:|> Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
:|> . . .
:|> ****************************************************************
:|> THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
:|> SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
:|>
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
:|> ****************************************************************
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|