| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"|-|erc" |
| Date: |
30 Dec 2003 06:44:56 AM |
| Object: |
James Randi speaks |
Barry, you must recognize that the million-dollar challenge is probably the single most-feared
element in the belief system these people have constructed. They can't respond to it, because they
know they can't perform as they fantasize they can. This delusion is so cherished, so important to
them, that they will invent, distort, and lie in order to avoid facing the truth. Indeed, truth is
their greatest enemy, and it is brought up to them by the JREF challenge, every day.
Let me knock this idiot off his block by taking his million!
Herc
--
<^> <(·¿·)> <^> ---- <^> <(·¿·)> <^> 2004 <^> <(·¿·)> <^> --- <^> <(·¿·)> <^>
Chat at www.chatty.net THE NEW YEARS ONLINE PARTY!!
<^> <(·¿·)> <^> ---- <^> <(·¿·)> <^> 2004 <^> <(·¿·)> <^> --- <^> <(·¿·)> <^>
.
|
|
| User: "Jim" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
11 Jan 2004 10:30:13 AM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message news:<gmeIb.326$uQ3.10631@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>...
Barry, you must recognize that the million-dollar challenge is probably the single most-feared
element in the belief system these people have constructed. They can't respond to it, because they
know they can't perform as they fantasize they can. This delusion is so cherished, so important to
them, that they will invent, distort, and lie in order to avoid facing the truth. Indeed, truth is
their greatest enemy, and it is brought up to them by the JREF challenge, every day.
Let me knock this idiot off his block by taking his million!
Herc
You blew your chance nearly two years ago, Herc.
"Barry also provides this news item about a correspondent who uses the
name "Herc Ules" (brilliant!) in his posts to me, which are virulent,
vague, and just plain weird. (So what else is new, Randi?) Judging
from this news, I may be spared some nasty stuff, at least for a
while. Says Barry:
I believe you also heard from this chap. He wouldn't be put off
but kept pestering us with incomprehensible claims. I tried to let him
down gently, but when he started making threats, I had to let the
police know and they took it very seriously and quickly tracked him
down. I doubt he would have carried out his threat, but you can't be
sure. How would I have felt if I had just shrugged him off and next
week heard of someone being poisoned after eating ***** Smith peanut
butter.
***** Smith, very well-known in Australia, is a leading supporter of
the skeptical (pardon me, sceptical!) movement there, and one of his
business interests is producing food products.
Australian Broadcasting News: A man charged with threatening to
poison food produced by ***** Smith has been refused bail in the
Rockhampton Magistrates Court in central Queensland. Graham Andrew
Cooper, 30, is charged with trying extort $100,000 from the Australian
Sceptics Association. Cooper appeared in court this morning charged
with stalking, extortion and sending threatening e-mails. The court
was told Cooper sent e-mails to Barry Williams from the Australian
Sceptics Association, which has offered $100,000 to anyone who can
prove psychic powers. The police prosecutor said Cooper claimed the
association refused to test him. It is alleged the e-mails said that
***** Smith owed him $100,000 and that he would put rat sack into as
much ***** Smith food as he could lay his hands on. The court was told
Cooper is a paranoid schizophrenic and police said the threats were
not carried out. Cooper will be held in custody until his next court
appearance in May.
The term "rat sack" refers to rat poison. These colorful Aussie
expressions....!"
Source: http://www.randi.org/jr/031502.html
"We have to handle every challenger, until or unless that person or
group shows that they're totally unreasonable and/or uncooperative,
and/or mentally incapable of handling the matter."
Source: http://www.randi.org/jr/092702.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Griffin" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
30 Dec 2003 07:57:35 AM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
Barry, you must recognize that the million-dollar challenge
is probably the single most-feared element in the belief
system these people have constructed. They can't respond to
it, because they know they can't perform as they fantasize
they can. This delusion is so cherished, so important to
them, that they will invent, distort, and lie in order to
avoid facing the truth. Indeed, truth is their greatest
enemy, and it is brought up to them by the JREF challenge,
every day.
Let me knock this idiot off his block by taking his
million!
HAHAHA@<choke>@#$HAHAHAH<gasp>&*^@#HAHAHAHAHA<barf><CHOKE>HAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Give it up, chowderhead. The world stupidity record, the only
thing you could possibly hope to "win," is out of your reach.
You're destined for mediocrity even at that.
Herc
who is doing a pitifully sorry job of whatever he's trying to
do.
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
30 Dec 2003 05:57:26 PM |
|
|
"BackToNormal" <mungymungy@sexxtra.cop.nnz> wrote in
OKAY, in English which people can understand, what exactly is your
claim?
No embellishments, no refs to anything previous.
CLAIM "That handles of replies to me can be guessed by what they wrote"
You wrote : > No embellishments, no refs to anything previous
Anyone can guess your alias by that : BackToNormal
SEE?
BackToNormal wrote : "Back to normal!!"
BackToNormal wrote : "post directly, post normally, back from citing references"
In a sealed booth, I could get your reply and a small list of alias
and GUESS YOUR ALIAS
What do you claim you can do that is paranormal?
ronh
My name is xxx xxx, I would like to demonstrate a
paranormal ability being able to guess peoples names
from what they say, write or do.
Contact: [private]
xxx xxx
----------------------------------------------
Specifically,
1 I make a post to usenet
2 I wait in a sealed booth
3 A skeptic brings me the reply (message only, and 10 options for the authors handle)
4 I tick one of the 10 names
5 I get it right 6 days running and that beats 1 in 1,000,000 odds of fluking it.
Example of Step 3 :
I am given the question :
WHO REPLIED TO YOU LIKE THIS?
OKAY, in English which people can understand, what exactly is your
claim?
No embellishments, no refs to anything previous.
What do you claim you can do that is paranormal?
Was it
1 / Tim
2 / Mary
3 / BackToNormal
4 / Raven
5 / Ghost
6 / Timmy
7 / Betty
8 / Snotty
9 / Bart
10 / Rich
I read the message, then I (like anyone here) would tick BackToNormal
because that's what the post talks about.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chani" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
02 Jan 2004 04:31:30 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message
news:JcoIb.40$EM4.1327@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
"BackToNormal" <mungymungy@sexxtra.cop.nnz> wrote in
OKAY, in English which people can understand, what exactly is your
claim?
No embellishments, no refs to anything previous.
CLAIM "That handles of replies to me can be guessed by what they wrote"
You wrote : > No embellishments, no refs to anything previous
Anyone can guess your alias by that : BackToNormal
SEE?
BackToNormal wrote : "Back to normal!!"
BackToNormal wrote : "post directly, post normally, back from citing
references"
In a sealed booth, I could get your reply and a small list of alias
and GUESS YOUR ALIAS
What do you claim you can do that is paranormal?
ronh
My name is xxx xxx, I would like to demonstrate a
paranormal ability being able to guess peoples names
from what they say, write or do.
Contact: [private]
xxx xxx
----------------------------------------------
Specifically,
1 I make a post to usenet
2 I wait in a sealed booth
3 A skeptic brings me the reply (message only, and 10 options for the
authors handle)
4 I tick one of the 10 names
5 I get it right 6 days running and that beats 1 in 1,000,000 odds of
fluking it.
Example of Step 3 :
I am given the question :
WHO REPLIED TO YOU LIKE THIS?
OKAY, in English which people can understand, what exactly is your
claim?
No embellishments, no refs to anything previous.
What do you claim you can do that is paranormal?
Was it
1 / Tim
2 / Mary
3 / BackToNormal
4 / Raven
5 / Ghost
6 / Timmy
7 / Betty
8 / Snotty
9 / Bart
10 / Rich
I read the message, then I (like anyone here) would tick BackToNormal
because that's what the post talks about.
Well if you can do it then go here: http://randi.org/research/index.html
Apply and take the JREF's money. Think of how much you could do with a
million dollars. And Randi is ready to hand it out to verifiable claims.
--
Chani, atheist #1118
Head of the EAC
Tweeker of Tukla, a very, um, colorful Ratte
***********************************
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
02 Jan 2004 05:52:58 PM |
|
|
"Chani" <atheist@thereisnogod.com> wrote in >
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in > >
"BackToNormal" <mungymungy@sexxtra.cop.nnz> wrote in
OKAY, in English which people can understand, what exactly is your
claim?
No embellishments, no refs to anything previous.
CLAIM "That handles of replies to me can be guessed by what they wrote"
You wrote : > No embellishments, no refs to anything previous
Anyone can guess your alias by that : BackToNormal
SEE?
BackToNormal wrote : "Back to normal!!"
BackToNormal wrote : "post directly, post normally, back from citing
references"
In a sealed booth, I could get your reply and a small list of alias
and GUESS YOUR ALIAS
What do you claim you can do that is paranormal?
ronh
My name is xxx xxx, I would like to demonstrate a
paranormal ability being able to guess peoples names
from what they say, write or do.
Contact: [private]
xxx xxx
----------------------------------------------
Specifically,
1 I make a post to usenet
2 I wait in a sealed booth
3 A skeptic brings me the reply (message only, and 10 options for the
authors handle)
4 I tick one of the 10 names
5 I get it right 6 days running and that beats 1 in 1,000,000 odds of
fluking it.
Example of Step 3 :
I am given the question :
WHO REPLIED TO YOU LIKE THIS?
OKAY, in English which people can understand, what exactly is your
claim?
No embellishments, no refs to anything previous.
What do you claim you can do that is paranormal?
Was it
1 / Tim
2 / Mary
3 / BackToNormal
4 / Raven
5 / Ghost
6 / Timmy
7 / Betty
8 / Snotty
9 / Bart
10 / Rich
I read the message, then I (like anyone here) would tick BackToNormal
because that's what the post talks about.
Well if you can do it then go here: http://randi.org/research/index.html
Apply and take the JREF's money. Think of how much you could do with a
million dollars. And Randi is ready to hand it out to verifiable claims.
1 he ignores international applications
2 i can't afford to fly there
3 he insists Australia Skeptics do the preliminary
4 Australia Skeptics wont listen to my claim
I've been trying for years to get a test by a skeptic company
Read my post "1207 days since James Randi ignored my notarised application"
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chani" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
02 Jan 2004 09:53:22 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message
news:SqnJb.433$FD6.11767@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
"Chani" <atheist@thereisnogod.com> wrote in >
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in > >
"BackToNormal" <mungymungy@sexxtra.cop.nnz> wrote in
OKAY, in English which people can understand, what exactly is your
claim?
No embellishments, no refs to anything previous.
CLAIM "That handles of replies to me can be guessed by what they
wrote"
You wrote : > No embellishments, no refs to anything previous
Anyone can guess your alias by that : BackToNormal
SEE?
BackToNormal wrote : "Back to normal!!"
BackToNormal wrote : "post directly, post normally, back from
citing
references"
In a sealed booth, I could get your reply and a small list of alias
and GUESS YOUR ALIAS
What do you claim you can do that is paranormal?
ronh
My name is xxx xxx, I would like to demonstrate a
paranormal ability being able to guess peoples names
from what they say, write or do.
Contact: [private]
xxx xxx
----------------------------------------------
Specifically,
1 I make a post to usenet
2 I wait in a sealed booth
3 A skeptic brings me the reply (message only, and 10 options for the
authors handle)
4 I tick one of the 10 names
5 I get it right 6 days running and that beats 1 in 1,000,000 odds of
fluking it.
Example of Step 3 :
I am given the question :
WHO REPLIED TO YOU LIKE THIS?
OKAY, in English which people can understand, what exactly is
your
claim?
No embellishments, no refs to anything previous.
What do you claim you can do that is paranormal?
Was it
1 / Tim
2 / Mary
3 / BackToNormal
4 / Raven
5 / Ghost
6 / Timmy
7 / Betty
8 / Snotty
9 / Bart
10 / Rich
I read the message, then I (like anyone here) would tick BackToNormal
because that's what the post talks about.
Well if you can do it then go here:
http://randi.org/research/index.html
Apply and take the JREF's money. Think of how much you could do with a
million dollars. And Randi is ready to hand it out to verifiable
claims.
1 he ignores international applications
*****. He does not.
2 i can't afford to fly there
Yeah, convenient excuse. If I could get a million dollars for nothing, I
would scrounge up the money. Must not have much faith in your abilities,
eh?
3 he insists Australia Skeptics do the preliminary
And why would that be so burdensome?
4 Australia Skeptics wont listen to my claim
It sounds like you are making excuses. Is it because you can't verify your
claims? Hmmm?
I've been trying for years to get a test by a skeptic company
Read my post "1207 days since James Randi ignored my notarised
application"
I would recommend that you find out why your application has not been
addressed. And instead of whining about it on alt.atheism, there is a whole
forum at randi.org that is devoted to the Million Dollar Challenge. People
there could help you a lot better than here where you go unheard.
Of course, once again, I think you are making excuses because your claims
can not be substantiated.
--
Chani, atheist #1118
Head of the EAC
Tweeker of Tukla, a very, um, colorful Ratte
***********************************
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Bravo" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
02 Jan 2004 11:16:48 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 03:53:22 GMT, "Chani" <atheist@thereisnogod.com>
wrote:
I read the message, then I (like anyone here) would tick BackToNormal
because that's what the post talks about.
It sounds like you are making excuses. Is it because you can't verify your
claims? Hmmm?
Herc is barely coherent; he claims paranormal abilities that anyone
here can do. I've given him a test, he refuses to even attempt it; he
doesn't want his claims tested, he wants to whine about how persecuted
he is. Rather like Ed Conrad over in talk.origins.
--
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability
of the human mind to correlate all its contents." - H.P. Lovecraft
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chani" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
03 Jan 2004 07:30:34 PM |
|
|
"Johnny Bravo" <nospam@no.com> wrote in message
news:bvjcvvchusfo4f16rpud6m6h3p0n71mei5@4ax.com...
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 03:53:22 GMT, "Chani" <atheist@thereisnogod.com>
wrote:
I read the message, then I (like anyone here) would tick
BackToNormal
because that's what the post talks about.
It sounds like you are making excuses. Is it because you can't verify
your
claims? Hmmm?
Herc is barely coherent; he claims paranormal abilities that anyone
here can do. I've given him a test, he refuses to even attempt it; he
doesn't want his claims tested, he wants to whine about how persecuted
he is. Rather like Ed Conrad over in talk.origins.
I have found many of these so called psychics are that way. They claim to
be the real deal, but when it comes down to testing their abilities to prove
they are the real deal, they back out with numerous reason as to why they
can't be tested. Heck, Sylvia Browne said on national TV several times that
she would be tested, and has yet to submit to the testing. Go figure.
Frauds are frauds are frauds.
What continues to amaze me is that people continue to be sucked into this
crap.
--
Chani, atheist #1118
Head of the EAC
Tweeker of Tukla, a very, um, colorful Ratte
***********************************
--
"The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability
of the human mind to correlate all its contents." - H.P. Lovecraft
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "jwk" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
03 Jan 2004 07:41:55 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message news:<SqnJb.433$FD6.11767@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>...
"Chani" <atheist@thereisnogod.com> wrote in >
[snip]
Well if you can do it then go here: http://randi.org/research/index.html
Apply and take the JREF's money. Think of how much you could do with a
million dollars. And Randi is ready to hand it out to verifiable claims.
1 he ignores international applications
2 i can't afford to fly there
Really? Well you would think that wouldn't matter, since you are
assured of getting the million to make up for the expense.
However I understand that you want to save your pennies. Tell you
what, if you win the million from Randi I will personally reimburse
you for your travel and living expenses. You can't beat that offer,
since you are assured to win. :)
jwk
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peter Bowditch" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
03 Jan 2004 01:33:14 AM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
"Chani" <atheist@thereisnogod.com> wrote in >
<snip>
Well if you can do it then go here: http://randi.org/research/index.html
Apply and take the JREF's money. Think of how much you could do with a
million dollars. And Randi is ready to hand it out to verifiable claims.
1 he ignores international applications
No he doesn't. There are procedures to follow.
2 i can't afford to fly there
If I had a guaranteed power which would win a million bucks, I would
put the Qantas ticket on the plastic.
3 he insists Australia Skeptics do the preliminary
He requests that others do preliminary tests so that his time is nor
wasted
4 Australia Skeptics wont listen to my claim
Australian Skeptics cannot figure out what your claim is. It has to be
something which can be precisely stated and for which an unambiguous
test can be created.
I've been trying for years to get a test by a skeptic company
Read my post "1207 days since James Randi ignored my notarised application"
Herc
--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
03 Jan 2004 02:11:46 AM |
|
|
1 he ignores international applications
No he doesn't. There are procedures to follow.
yes he does, I swore in front of a FP on my application
mailed it, 3 weeks later they stopped replying to emails.
2 i can't afford to fly there
If I had a guaranteed power which would win a million bucks, I would
put the Qantas ticket on the plastic.
i'm running win 95 on a 686 that takes 5 boots each day. you wont have
to worry about me posting on usenet much longer. no credit card.
3 he insists Australia Skeptics do the preliminary
He requests that others do preliminary tests so that his time is nor
wasted
even when A Current Affair shows them denying applicants.
4 Australia Skeptics wont listen to my claim
Australian Skeptics cannot figure out what your claim is. It has to be
something which can be precisely stated and for which an unambiguous
test can be created.
rubbish, you've never seen it.
can you honestly tell me there is no way you could work out a test.
i've 2 powers, i read answers from opening books
i guess names of replies to me on usent.
how difficult is it to test?
that's besides the point, why can't you check up on townsville.
there's no use doing a test if noone in townvsille knows about me,
because 100,000 witnesses is much stronger.
you might act polite pete, but your a skum underneath out to trick people.
thats you BOW invite Adam, DITCH ignore the application
this is me GRAHAM you better not kill the groom COOPER computer
answer this :
why is the skeptics run by 3 dicks?
Randi, Willy, Richard
do you know anyone in townsville, they can ALL tell you I *AM* paranormal.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "JessHC" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
03 Jan 2004 07:14:23 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message news:<pKuJb.553$FD6.16406@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>...
<snip>
i've 2 powers, i read answers from opening books
i guess names of replies to me on usent.
how difficult is it to test?
<snip>
Guess my name.
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
03 Jan 2004 07:24:24 PM |
|
|
"JessHC" <jesshc@phantomemail.com> wrote in
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in
<snip>
i've 2 powers, i read answers from opening books
i guess names of replies to me on usent.
how difficult is it to test?
<snip>
Guess my name.
Jess.
Again, how difficult is it to TEST?
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "JessHC" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
08 Jan 2004 01:35:05 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message news:<qSJJb.662$FD6.23676@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>...
"JessHC" <jesshc@phantomemail.com> wrote in
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in
<snip>
i've 2 powers, i read answers from opening books
i guess names of replies to me on usent.
how difficult is it to test?
<snip>
Guess my name.
Jess.
Again, how difficult is it to TEST?
Jess isn't my name.
.
|
|
|
| User: "George" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
08 Jan 2004 10:14:35 PM |
|
|
(JessHC) wrote in message news:<d58e3ac.0401081135.5c433aa6@posting.google.com>...
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message news:<qSJJb.662$FD6.23676@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>...
"JessHC" < > wrote in
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in
<snip>
i've 2 powers, i read answers from opening books
i guess names of replies to me on usent.
how difficult is it to test?
<snip>
Guess my name.
Jess.
Again, how difficult is it to TEST?
Jess isn't my name.
Shock horror. Do you mean that he couldn't guess your name?
Guess that makes him a kook. But then what else did we expect ?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gonzalez, Elver" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
10 Jan 2004 03:41:16 PM |
|
|
Randi ia a real fraud.
This guy and his vp Hal Bidlack only want your donations.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
12 Jan 2004 11:06:49 PM |
|
|
"Gonzalez, Elver" wrote:
Randi ia a real fraud.
This guy and his vp Hal Bidlack only want your donations.
And you are gone.
*PLONK*
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Krolczyk" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
12 Jan 2004 05:17:09 PM |
|
|
(Gonzalez, Elver) wrote in message news:<efcbcc21.0401101341.186e6fa4@posting.google.com>...
Randi ia a real fraud.
Prove it.
C'mon, Elver, let's see precisely how much acumen you have
concerning the legal proof of fraud vis-a-vis Randi's
million-dollar challenge. Here's
http://www.randi.org/research/challenge.html
to make it easier for you.
This guy and his vp Hal Bidlack only want your donations.
I spoke too soon. Hal bars one idiot from the forum and
he responds by proving Bidlack's point ad infinitum.
-Chris Krolczyk
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Griffin" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
10 Jan 2004 08:46:17 PM |
|
|
(Gonzalez, Elver) wrote:
Randi ia a real fraud.
This guy and his vp Hal Bidlack only want your donations.
What do you want? Sperm "donations"?
If you can't get a job by next Friday, kill yourself.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DrPostman" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
12 Jan 2004 08:08:23 AM |
|
|
On 10 Jan 2004 13:41:16 -0800, (Gonzalez,
Elver) wrote:
Randi ia a real fraud.
This guy and his vp Hal Bidlack only want your donations.
Poor baby can't get over his spanking.
--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com
"Shake it like a polaroid picture."
- Andre 3000 of Outkast
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
10 Jan 2004 03:57:36 PM |
|
|
On 10 Jan 2004, Gonzalez, Elver wrote:
Randi ia a real fraud.
This guy and his vp Hal Bidlack only want your donations.
No, that's the pope you are thinking about.
By calling someone a "fraud," you are implying they are guilty of some
kind of misdeeds.
If you know of any frauds Randi has perpetrated, please inform us. If you
have no specifics, we will know you are misinformed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Huntley" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
10 Jan 2004 04:09:51 PM |
|
|
Carol Lee Smith <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in sci.skeptic, message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040110155550.15122C-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu:
On 10 Jan 2004, Gonzalez, Elver wrote:
Randi ia a real fraud.
This guy and his vp Hal Bidlack only want your donations.
No, that's the pope you are thinking about.
By calling someone a "fraud," you are implying they are guilty of some
kind of misdeeds.
If you know of any frauds Randi has perpetrated, please inform us. If
you have no specifics, we will know you are misinformed.
We already know that about Elver.
- L
--
Larry Huntley
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please don't crosspost this crap to alt.music.michael-jackson. We are
serious newsgroupers engaged in thought-provoking debate concerning the
King of Pop and his kin. Thank you, and long live Michael, Jerky, Ger-
anium, Arlo and Frito.
- Tattoo Vampire in sci.astro (and elsewhere)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
04 Jan 2004 01:54:39 AM |
|
|
"JessHC" <jesshc@phantomemail.com> wrote in message
news:d58e3ac.0401031714.4b631fb4@posting.google.com...
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message
news:<pKuJb.553$FD6.16406@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>...
<snip>
i've 2 powers, i read answers from opening books
i guess names of replies to me on usent.
how difficult is it to test?
<snip>
Guess my name.
He's slipping. Usually he says he guesses the name of the person sending the
message until you challenge him then he starts adding rules.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peter Bowditch" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
03 Jan 2004 07:20:10 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
thats you BOW invite Adam, DITCH ignore the application
this is me GRAHAM you better not kill the groom COOPER computer
??????
answer this :
why is the skeptics run by 3 dicks?
Randi, Willy, Richard
The Australian Skeptics can do even better. There are three people
named "Richard" on the committee. To impress people from other slang
environments, there are also two people called "Peter".
By the way, one of the founders of Australian Skeptics is named
"Adams". That must make him more powerful than a singleton Adam (or
even a Townsville Adam). Need I mention that the other founder is
named *****?
--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
03 Jan 2004 08:37:36 PM |
|
|
<^> <(·¿·)> <^> ---- <^> <(·¿·)> <^> 2004 <^> <(·¿·)> <^> --- <^> <(·¿·)> <^>
"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@ratbags.com> wrote
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
thats you BOW invite Adam, DITCH ignore the application
this is me GRAHAM you better not kill the groom COOPER computer
??????
In theory I could have *predicted* you would not accept my application
because of the Ditch in your surname. If your surname was Bowpay then
I wouldn't be complaining.
answer this :
why is the skeptics run by 3 dicks?
Randi, Willy, Richard
The Australian Skeptics can do even better. There are three people
named "Richard" on the committee. To impress people from other slang
environments, there are also two people called "Peter".
By the way, one of the founders of Australian Skeptics is named
"Adams". That must make him more powerful than a singleton Adam (or
even a Townsville Adam). Need I mention that the other founder is
named *****?
cool, the thing is I have a paranormal claim right here right now from me to you.
The claim is just "I am paranormal, and 100,000 people in Townsville know it".
I'm not interested in aus skeptics testing, all I want is this claim investigated.
By you! Can you tell me that you will investigate my claim, some time early
in the year?
This is not outright evidence but its valid testimony.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dksqpv41597ofbhr16mi7tdj2qfihvoldv%404ax.com
my uncle told me you post here... he's did some audio on your
secret show and gave me some tapes. love the show.
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=9aqbbv85c53jobkenltkil2tbsdk7m2n3p@4ax.com
I was in Townsville over the weekend, and I heard him.
Very spooky!
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3eb66422.779705967@news.ozemail.com.au
I'm in Townsville. We're sick of you
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.OSF.4.21.0309230859190.5384-100000%40marlin.jcu.edu.au
Do you know if he is living in Townsville?
I've been hearing stuff, yeah.
The reason they all 'heard' me is because the governmnet knew I was paranormal
long before I did! They monitor me with spy satellites, only in the last 2 years the
spy satellites have an active mode, and can function as a PA system anywhere on Earth.
Its such a fantastic claim, but its a claim bounded to be testable. Because obviously
if this claim was true, then all of 100,000 population of Townsville would know about me.
Its trivial to disprove if you are right, its trivial to verify if I am right. You just have to
make
a contact in Townsville. That's all I ask Pete. Check my claim. Start by checking the 4
links. If you can confirm you will attempt to verify or discredit my claim it will give me
a rest from it all. You just have to find a contact in Townsville. THEY ALL KNOW !
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "lensman1955" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
04 Jan 2004 06:09:46 AM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message news:<2XKJb.714$FD6.24339@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>...
Its trivial to disprove if you are right, its trivial to verify if I am right. You just have to
make
a contact in Townsville.
Everytime this guy posts, I have an image of the Powerpuff Girls in my head!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vanilla Gorilla Monkey Boy" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
04 Jan 2004 01:35:48 PM |
|
|
On 4 Jan 2004 04:09:46 -0800, (lensman1955)
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell:
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message news:<2XKJb.714$FD6.24339@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>...
Its trivial to disprove if you are right, its trivial to verify if I am right. You just have to
make
a contact in Townsville.
Everytime this guy posts, I have an image of the Powerpuff Girls in my head!
That's one of his "paranormal powers", but he doesn't know about it
yet.
--
V.G.
"People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it is easier to harrass
rich women than it is motorcycle gangs." - Bumper Sticker
(This sig file contains not less than 80% recycled SPAM)
Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
04 Jan 2004 03:27:35 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 12:37:36 +1000, "|-|erc"
<trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
<^> <(·¿·)> <^> ---- <^> <(·¿·)> <^> 2004 <^> <(·¿·)> <^> --- <^> <(·¿·)> <^>
"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@ratbags.com> wrote
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
thats you BOW invite Adam, DITCH ignore the application
this is me GRAHAM you better not kill the groom COOPER computer
??????
In theory I could have *predicted* you would not accept my application
because of the Ditch in your surname. If your surname was Bowpay then
I wouldn't be complaining.
answer this :
why is the skeptics run by 3 dicks?
Randi, Willy, Richard
The Australian Skeptics can do even better. There are three people
named "Richard" on the committee. To impress people from other slang
environments, there are also two people called "Peter".
By the way, one of the founders of Australian Skeptics is named
"Adams". That must make him more powerful than a singleton Adam (or
even a Townsville Adam). Need I mention that the other founder is
named *****?
cool, the thing is I have a paranormal claim right here right now from me to you.
The claim is just "I am paranormal, and 100,000 people in Townsville know it".
Well, that's wrong for starters. I know several people in Townsville,
and NOT ONE OF THEM HAS HEARD OF YOU.
I'm not interested in aus skeptics testing, all I want is this claim investigated.
By you! Can you tell me that you will investigate my claim, some time early
in the year?
This is not outright evidence but its valid testimony.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dksqpv41597ofbhr16mi7tdj2qfihvoldv%404ax.com
my uncle told me you post here... he's did some audio on your
secret show and gave me some tapes. love the show.
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=9aqbbv85c53jobkenltkil2tbsdk7m2n3p@4ax.com
I was in Townsville over the weekend, and I heard him.
Very spooky!
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3eb66422.779705967@news.ozemail.com.au
I'm in Townsville. We're sick of you
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.OSF.4.21.0309230859190.5384-100000%40marlin.jcu.edu.au
Do you know if he is living in Townsville?
I've been hearing stuff, yeah.
The reason they all 'heard' me is because the governmnet knew I was paranormal
long before I did! They monitor me with spy satellites, only in the last 2 years the
spy satellites have an active mode, and can function as a PA system anywhere on Earth.
*****. Get to a shrink. Seriously.
Its such a fantastic claim, but its a claim bounded to be testable. Because obviously
if this claim was true, then all of 100,000 population of Townsville would know about me.
But they don't. Of course, the police, and the courts do, as well as
the Dole office.
Its trivial to disprove if you are right, its trivial to verify if I am right. You just have to
make
a contact in Townsville. That's all I ask Pete. Check my claim. Start by checking the 4
links. If you can confirm you will attempt to verify or discredit my claim it will give me
a rest from it all. You just have to find a contact in Townsville. THEY ALL KNOW !
Nope, I already asked several contacts in Townsville. I've already
proven you are a nutcase.
Seriously Herc, go and see your doctor.
--
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
04 Jan 2004 02:01:56 PM |
|
|
"Wally AngleseaT" <wanglese@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote in
message news:sumfvv80trahegmpr89jurokt3of41amrs@4ax.com...
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 12:37:36 +1000, "|-|erc"
<snip>
cool, the thing is I have a paranormal claim right here right now from me
to you.
The claim is just "I am paranormal, and 100,000 people in Townsville know
it".
Well, that's wrong for starters. I know several people in Townsville,
and NOT ONE OF THEM HAS HEARD OF YOU.
<Snip>
If this guy is not a troll it is pointless to argue with him or post
evidence.
I've only been around one or two of them and there is nothing you can do to
resolve their problem.
I suggested to one lady who was convinced that the neighbors were putting
poison in her instant coffee to hide the one she used and put another on the
counter top. She immediately told me that they would know what she was doing
and where she hid it.
Herc will have a "valid" reason as to why the people you contacted didn't
know of him.
He sounds and probably is harmless.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BackToNormal" |
|
| Title: Re: James Randi speaks |
04 Jan 2004 01:53:15 AM |
|
|
|-|erc <trymyform@www adamski ngdom.com> wrote:
*******
*******
*******
In theory I could have *predicted* you would not accept my application
because of the Ditch in your surname.
And YOU have ADAMSKI in your addy.
Imagine that. Herc's related to George Adamski.!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey Hoick, why don't you do a google to read about your fruitcake rellie
named ADAMSKI.
ronh
--
"People do not make decisions on facts, rather,
how they feel about the facts" Robert Consedine
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
