roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

Michelle Malkin wrote:

The list belongs to me. I gave my permission for the
list to be posted on the alt.atheism newsgroup website.
Jason did not ask for my permission to post my list
on his website. And, he very sneakily stole a copy
of the list when he was denied access to the newsgroup
website. Therefore, Jason is a thief, a liar and a
fraud. He is also a very poor example of Christianity.

Glad to see that Jason has you all on the run.

Jason has a rather curious way of putting people "on the run." It seems

include theft and then ducking out on the responsiiblities for that theft.

I did enjoy all the bogus huffing and puffing! <chuckle>

"Bogus huffing and puffing?"

I wonder if any of you will actually put your money
where your mouths are?

Meaning?

I doubt it...

You shouldn't doubt it, Roger. Those of us who oppose Jason and say,
"J'accuse" are right here. Jason has shown what he's all about.

roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

Michelle Malkin wrote:

The list belongs to me. I gave my permission for the list to be
posted on the alt.atheism newsgroup website. Jason did not
ask for my permission to post my list on his website. And, he
very sneakily stole a copy of the list when he was denied
access to the newsgroup website. Therefore, Jason is a thief, a
liar and a fraud. He is also a very poor example of Christianity.

Glad to see that Jason has you all on the run.

By "has on the run," do you mean "is encouraging people to join the
a.a. list?

I did enjoy all the bogus huffing and puffing! <chuckle>

By "bogus huffing and puffing," did you mean "pointing out that
sidestepping barriers put in place to prevent a specific person from
taking something without permission is at best morally questionable,
but not surprizing considering who it was"?

I wonder if any of you will actually put your money where your mouths

are?

By "I wonder if any of you will actually put your money where your
mouths are," did you mean "It amuses me that Jason stole something and
there's not much you can do about it"?

I doubt it...

By "I doubt it..." did you mean, "Well, I saw several people point out
that there wasn't much could be done other than chide Jason for being
so slimey, but let's pretend otherwise"?

All the best,

By "All the best," did you mean "***** you"?

In our last episode
<1114272393.934411.187590@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>, roger_pearse
pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:

Michelle Malkin wrote:

The list belongs to me. I gave my permission for the list to be posted
on the alt.atheism newsgroup website. Jason did not ask for my
permission to post my list on his website. And, he very sneakily stole

copy of the list when he was denied access to the newsgroup website.
Therefore, Jason is a thief, a liar and a fraud. He is also a very poor
example of Christianity.

Glad to see that Jason has you all on the run.

Oh is *that what it's called when over a dozen new people join the list?

--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Group website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
-- Seneca the Younger

In our last episode
<1114272393.934411.187590@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>, roger_pearse
pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed:

Michelle Malkin wrote:

The list belongs to me. I gave my permission for the list to be
posted on the alt.atheism newsgroup website. Jason did not ask for
my permission to post my list on his website. And, he very sneakily
stole a copy of the list when he was denied access to the newsgroup
website. Therefore, Jason is a thief, a liar and a fraud. He is
also a very poor example of Christianity.

Glad to see that Jason has you all on the run.

Oh is *that what it's called when over a dozen new people join the
list?

stoney wrote:

[snip]

The list belongs to me. I gave my permission for the list to be
posted on the alt.atheism newsgroup website. Jason did not
ask for my permission to post my list on his website. And, he
very sneakily stole a copy of the list when he was denied
access to the newsgroup website. Therefore, Jason is a thief, a
liar and a fraud. He is also a very poor example of Christianity.

Disagree. He's a prime example of Christian institutionalized
immorality and is following the example set by the fictional bronze
age Jesus character.

I'm sure the Holy Horse-Thief is real proud
of you, Jason!

On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:29:07 +0100, John M Collins
<jmc@caveman.xisl.com> wrote:

On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:26:11 -0400, Michelle Malkin wrote:

Therefore, Jason is a thief, a
liar and a fraud. He is also a very poor example of Christianity.

I disagree with you there.

He may be a poor example in the sense of showing a model of behaviour to
others, but he's a great example of the way xtians in general behave.

That bad?

Sorry but don't know who Newman is.

On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:39:06 -0500, Vic Sagerquist
<address@withheld.com> wrote:

on 14 Apr 2005 in alt.atheism, Les Hellawell dropped trou, farted, whirled,
then shouted:

He is SUCH a liar :P

They know exactly what they are doing and why and just how shamefull
it is.

They betray themselves with their dodging and weaving but they
know in their own 'hearts' what they do. They condemn themselves
with their disengeneous responces not us.

It is their conscience and morality in question not ours. We can
hold our heads high knowing we have done nothing wrong. Can they?

Of course. They have the catchall forgiver. Sometimes I picture Jesus'
face as that of Alfred E. Newman. What, me worry?

So basically what so are saying (If I may attempt to put words in your
mouth :-) is that although they claim a higher morality, in practise
they have none at all and like psychopaths have no sense of right and
wrong or respect for others and are basically out of control? This
certainly would explain why some of them have been acting like a bunch
of hooligans lately leaving their own newsgroups and rampaging around
USENET hurling abuse and making laughable attempts tro intimidate us
into running away and hiding. Well I can stand up and look these
bullies in the eyes (morally and metaphorically speaking of course :-)
knowing that their case is clearly so weak that they do not even
attemp to make it :-)

Sorry but don't know who Newman is.

What's funny is that soon after praying for us, Jason plonked a bunch of
us. Which shows where his interests lie...

He plonked me a long time ago leastways he never has any answers for
the many questions I keeps asking.

On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:39:06 -0500, Vic Sagerquist
<address@withheld.com> wrote:

on 14 Apr 2005 in alt.atheism, Les Hellawell dropped trou, farted, whirled,
then shouted:

He is SUCH a liar :P

They know exactly what they are doing and why and just how shamefull
it is.

They betray themselves with their dodging and weaving but they
know in their own 'hearts' what they do. They condemn themselves
with their disengeneous responces not us.

It is their conscience and morality in question not ours. We can
hold our heads high knowing we have done nothing wrong. Can they?

Of course. They have the catchall forgiver. Sometimes I picture Jesus'
face as that of Alfred E. Newman. What, me worry?

So basically what so are saying (If I may attempt to put words in your
mouth :-) is that although they claim a higher morality, in practise
they have none at all and like psychopaths have no sense of right and
wrong or respect for others and are basically out of control? This
certainly would explain why some of them have been acting like a bunch
of hooligans lately leaving their own newsgroups and rampaging around
USENET hurling abuse and making laughable attempts tro intimidate us
into running away and hiding. Well I can stand up and look these
bullies in the eyes (morally and metaphorically speaking of course :-)
knowing that their case is clearly so weak that they do not even
attemp to make it :-)

Sorry but don't know who Newman is.

What's funny is that soon after praying for us, Jason plonked a bunch of
us. Which shows where his interests lie...

He plonked me a long time ago leastways he never has any answers for
the many questions I keeps asking.

I have no problems whatsoever with Christians and those of other
faiths who come here to debate with us in a reasonable manner
and will happily engage with them because I know we have the
stronger position. The problem is that when they inevitably lose the
debate they all so often resort to insult and sarcasm before running
away. People don't like their belief system being challenged it
clearly makes them uncomfortable but they choose to come here.