Jesus a No-Show



 Religions > Atheism > Jesus a No-Show

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Greywolf"
Date: 17 Sep 2006 11:29:38 PM
Object: Jesus a No-Show
Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?
Greywolf
.

User: "Emmanual Kann"

Title: Re: Jesus a No-Show 20 Sep 2006 03:28:59 PM
An Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:29:38 -0500, Greywolf hat geschreibt:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

I like to think it's because Jesus is a myth.
.
User: "Ben Kaufman"

Title: Re: Jesus a No-Show 20 Sep 2006 07:11:17 PM
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:28:59 GMT, Emmanual Kann <kann@keinspam.de> wrote:

An Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:29:38 -0500, Greywolf hat geschreibt:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?


I like to think it's because Jesus is a myth.

Wait a second, I thought we had established that no one lied before 1859 :-)
Ben
.
User: "Emmanual Kann"

Title: Re: Jesus a No-Show 22 Sep 2006 02:28:49 AM
An Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:11:17 -0400, Ben Kaufman hat geschreibt:

On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:28:59 GMT, Emmanual Kann <kann@keinspam.de> wrote:

An Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:29:38 -0500, Greywolf hat geschreibt:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?


I like to think it's because Jesus is a myth.


Wait a second, I thought we had established that no one lied before 1859 :-)

No Republicans lied before 1854, but the party of liars did not invent the
phenomenon.
.

User: "Ben Kaufman"

Title: Re: Jesus a No-Show 21 Sep 2006 07:24:37 AM
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:11:17 -0400, Ben Kaufman
<spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-dollars@pobox.com> wrote:

On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:28:59 GMT, Emmanual Kann <kann@keinspam.de> wrote:

An Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:29:38 -0500, Greywolf hat geschreibt:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?


I like to think it's because Jesus is a myth.


Wait a second, I thought we had established that no one lied before 1859 :-)

Ben

Sorry, meant to say that "The Mother of All Lies" was in 1859 :-)
Ben
.



User: "Michael Ejercito"

Title: Re: Jesus a No-Show 19 Sep 2006 11:30:13 PM
Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

Greywolf

Because people like Pontius Pilate require appointments to see them.
Michael
.
User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Jesus a No-Show 20 Sep 2006 03:06:08 AM
On 19 Sep 2006 21:30:13 -0700, "Michael Ejercito"
<mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1158726613.911105.124320@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>


Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

Greywolf

Because people like Pontius Pilate require appointments to see them.

Your delusions get worse and worse each day.
I am now of the opinion that you are an atheist.
It is simply not possible that anyone with more than zero brain cells
could be a fucking dim as you.
Physically impossible.
.

User: "Uncle Vic"

Title: Re: Jesus a No-Show 20 Sep 2006 12:28:36 AM
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Michael Ejercito
(mejercit@hotmail.com) made the light shine upon us with this:


Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked
themselves why the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or
at a 'full' meeting of the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the
'non-believers' that cried out for him to be crucified? What, didn't
want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it in their faces? Or could it
simply be that he was too dead to make any further personal
appearances?

Greywolf

Because people like Pontius Pilate require appointments to see them.

Oh, I think ol' Ponty would have made an exception in this case. Ponty
was inquisitive, and fair, at least according to the Bible:
John 18:37 Pilate therefore said to him, "Are you a king then?" Jesus
answered, "You say that I am a king. For this reason I have been born,
and for this reason I have come into the world, that I should testify to
the truth. Everyone who is of the truth listens to my voice."
38 Pilate said to him, "What is truth?" When he had said this, he went
out again to the Jews, and said to them, "I find no basis for a charge
against him.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Plonked by Kadaitcha Man
.


User: ""

Title: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 19 Sep 2006 02:36:48 PM
Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

Greywolf

A BRAVADO??????????
Where is that inquiry mind that Evol-secular-atheists use to
characterize themselves?
The whole Bible warns against any tendency to BRAVADO
now you want Christ to use it against His enemies.
Where would that meekness that Christ is suuposed to teach us
in the face of adversities be?
Seculars, you have FAILED yet again to grasp the content of our book.
.
User: "Budikka666"

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 21 Sep 2006 04:47:48 PM
wrote:

Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

Greywolf


A BRAVADO??????????
Where is that inquiry mind that Evol-secular-atheists use to
characterize themselves?
The whole Bible warns against any tendency to BRAVADO
now you want Christ to use it against His enemies.
Where would that meekness that Christ is suuposed to teach us
in the face of adversities be?
Seculars, you have FAILED yet again to grasp the content of our book.

What content? There's nothing in there about any gods that has been in
any way, shape, or form verified. Meanwhile, the Theory of Evolution
has 150 years of solid science supporting it and accumulates more
evidence almost daily.
Sorry, but you lose. Again.
Budikka
.

User: "Cary Kittrell"

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 05:22:48 PM
In article <1158694608.040557.175410@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "codebreaker@bigsecret.com" <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:


Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

Greywolf


A BRAVADO??????????
Where is that inquiry mind that Evol-secular-atheists use to
characterize themselves?
The whole Bible warns against any tendency to BRAVADO
now you want Christ to use it against His enemies.
Where would that meekness that Christ is suuposed to teach us
in the face of adversities be?

OK, I give up: where is your meekness that Christ taught you
to assume in the face of your adversities?
-- cary
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 09:03:40 PM
Cary Kittrell wrote:

In article <1158694608.040557.175410@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "codebreaker@bigsecret.com" <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:


Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

Greywolf



A BRAVADO??????????
Where is that inquiry mind that Evol-secular-atheists use to
characterize themselves?
The whole Bible warns against any tendency to BRAVADO
now you want Christ to use it against His enemies.
Where would that meekness that Christ is suuposed to teach us
in the face of adversities be?



OK, I give up: where is your meekness that Christ taught you
to assume in the face of your adversities?

Can't you answer your own question?



-- cary

.
User: "Cary Kittrell"

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 21 Sep 2006 11:45:20 AM
In article <1158804220.498890.211810@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> "codebreaker@bigsecret.com" <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:


Cary Kittrell wrote:

In article <1158694608.040557.175410@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "codebreaker@bigsecret.com" <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:


Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

Greywolf



A BRAVADO??????????
Where is that inquiry mind that Evol-secular-atheists use to
characterize themselves?
The whole Bible warns against any tendency to BRAVADO
now you want Christ to use it against His enemies.
Where would that meekness that Christ is suuposed to teach us
in the face of adversities be?



OK, I give up: where is your meekness that Christ taught you
to assume in the face of your adversities?




Can't you answer your own question?

No, it seems I do need your help with this one: where is your meekness
that Christ taught you to assume in the face of your adversities?
-- cary
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 21 Sep 2006 12:50:45 PM
Cary Kittrell wrote:

In article <1158804220.498890.211810@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> "codebreaker@bigsecret.com" <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:


Cary Kittrell wrote:

In article <1158694608.040557.175410@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "codebreaker@bigsecret.com" <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:


Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

Greywolf



A BRAVADO??????????
Where is that inquiry mind that Evol-secular-atheists use to
characterize themselves?
The whole Bible warns against any tendency to BRAVADO
now you want Christ to use it against His enemies.
Where would that meekness that Christ is suuposed to teach us
in the face of adversities be?



OK, I give up: where is your meekness that Christ taught you
to assume in the face of your adversities?




Can't you answer your own question?



No, it seems I do need your help with this one: where is your meekness
that Christ taught you to assume in the face of your adversities?

Where is yours?
Did Dar-lose foret to teach you that? I would not be surprised




-- cary

.
User: "Cary Kittrell"

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 21 Sep 2006 12:57:18 PM
In article <1158861045.262879.284410@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> "codebreaker@bigsecret.com" <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:


Cary Kittrell wrote:

In article <1158804220.498890.211810@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> "codebreaker@bigsecret.com" <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:


Cary Kittrell wrote:

In article <1158694608.040557.175410@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "codebreaker@bigsecret.com" <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:


Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

Greywolf



A BRAVADO??????????
Where is that inquiry mind that Evol-secular-atheists use to
characterize themselves?
The whole Bible warns against any tendency to BRAVADO
now you want Christ to use it against His enemies.
Where would that meekness that Christ is suuposed to teach us
in the face of adversities be?



OK, I give up: where is your meekness that Christ taught you
to assume in the face of your adversities?




Can't you answer your own question?



No, it seems I do need your help with this one: where is your meekness
that Christ taught you to assume in the face of your adversities?



Where is yours?

And here we see that Codie has no intention whatever of obeying
Jesus in this matter. He's just having too much fun being snarky
and snippy, and if Jesus doesn't like it, I suppose Codie thinks
that's His problem.
-- cary
.





User: "BDK"

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 01:53:30 AM
In article <1158694608.040557.175410@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com says...


Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

Greywolf


A BRAVADO??????????
Where is that inquiry mind that Evol-secular-atheists use to
characterize themselves?
The whole Bible warns against any tendency to BRAVADO
now you want Christ to use it against His enemies.
Where would that meekness that Christ is suuposed to teach us
in the face of adversities be?
Seculars, you have FAILED yet again to grasp the content of our book.


No, we grasp the concept, and the real truth of your book, it's you who
haven't figured any of it out yet.
BDK
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 05:07:24 PM
BDK wrote:

In article <1158694608.040557.175410@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Codebreaker@bigsecret.com says...


Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

Greywolf


A BRAVADO??????????
Where is that inquiry mind that Evol-secular-atheists use to
characterize themselves?
The whole Bible warns against any tendency to BRAVADO
now you want Christ to use it against His enemies.
Where would that meekness that Christ is suuposed to teach us
in the face of adversities be?
Seculars, you have FAILED yet again to grasp the content of our book.



No, we grasp the concept, and the real truth of your book, it's you who
haven't figured any of it out yet.

Now tell me why the Roman Centurion said refferring to Jesus,
This man was really the Son Of God?
Tell me about the similarity and the difference of his statement
with Stephen speech before the SANHEDRIN.
How do you justify the contraste?


BDK

.
User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 05:13:56 PM
Christianity LONG AGO ruled many nations. It ruled the law. It murdered
anyone. It stole anything.
Today?
Christianity is weak and meaningless.
Politics?
Christian politics is OWNED AND OPERATED BY JEWS.
Christians SUPPORT the Jewish ZIONIST WAR TICKET.
NOTHING about the politics is Chritian. Christians GET NOTHING they ask
for. Jews? They get WAR AFTER WAR.
Christianity is already defeated.
Jew TV DESTROYED confidence in priests and the church. The public
thinks of them as homosexuals and child rapists.
What a joke.
A dead religion. What VALUES does christianity have today? ANYTHING THE
ZIONISTS SAY IT HAS and nothing else.
Besides killing women and children so their land is given to Israel,
and being ignorant of science... what do Christians do or know?
Nothing.
Evolution is fully explained BEFORE YOU WERE BORN.
Bitching about it now wont help it go away.
But ANOTHER GREAT PLAN provided to Christians BY THEIR ENEMIES.
Your life under Jew TV??????
How BEAUTIFUL IT IS for your daughter to have HALF BLACK CHILDREN. How
awesome it is to FLUNK OUT OF SCHOOL AND KNOW NOTHING OF SCIENCE, while
Jews and Muslims all go off to college and learn science and rule the
world.
Stupid fucks.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 05:25:10 PM
wrote:


Evolution is fully explained BEFORE YOU WERE BORN.

Christianity was not fully explained, this is why you are stupid about
it.
Instead they explained CATHOLICISM
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 05:34:46 PM
Christianity is the LEAST COMPLEX religion in history.
Oh... YOUR MADE UP VERSION where you IGNORE JESUS and do what you want
is VERY COMPLEX. We agree on that. Totally.
The TOTAL WORDS OF JESUS is a few pages.
Following what Jesus wanted is beyond easy.
You IGNORING ALL THOSE THINGS and LYING about serving Jesus is hard.
However, if you have the EXACT QUOTE WORDS of Jesus about his thoughts
on science or evolution... POST IT.
Evolution has LESS THAN NOTHING to do with Christianity.
LESS THAN NOTHING.
In ZERO WAYS does evolution impact following Jesus.
They are as TOTALLY UNRELATED as what color car you have.
So, in your FAKE made-up religion of pop-culture it is important.
You hate science because you WORSHIP PAUL. PAUL PAUL PAUL PAUL
PAUL PAUL PAUL PAUL
PAUL PAUL PAUL PAUL
PAUL PAUL PAUL PAUL
PAUL PAUL PAUL PAUL
PAUL PAUL PAUL PAUL
Not Jesus.
Jesus would NOT CARE ABOUT SCIENCE.
Render unto Caesar. Science is of THIS WORLD. The world of CAESAR.
You living unrepented in your sins against what JESUS DID TEACH, is
your problem.
You are FULL OF HATE AND ANGER.
Jesus LOVES AND SUPPORTS HIS ENEMIES>
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 09:09:21 PM
wrote:

Christianity is the LEAST COMPLEX religion in history.
Oh... YOUR MADE UP VERSION where you IGNORE JESUS and do what you want
is VERY COMPLEX. We agree on that. Totally.

The TOTAL WORDS OF JESUS is a few pages.

Following what Jesus wanted is beyond easy.
You IGNORING ALL THOSE THINGS and LYING about serving Jesus is hard.

However, if you have the EXACT QUOTE WORDS of Jesus about his thoughts
on science or evolution... POST IT.

Jesus referred to God as the Creator and not the EVOLVER


Evolution has LESS THAN NOTHING to do with Christianity.
LESS THAN NOTHING.

In ZERO WAYS does evolution impact following Jesus.

They are as TOTALLY UNRELATED as what color car you have.

So, in your FAKE made-up religion of pop-culture it is important.

You hate science because you WORSHIP PAUL. PAUL PAUL PAUL PAUL
PAUL PAUL PAUL PAUL
PAUL PAUL PAUL PAUL
PAUL PAUL PAUL PAUL
PAUL PAUL PAUL PAUL
PAUL PAUL PAUL PAUL

Not Jesus.

Paul gave meaning to Jesus mission when He promoted Him as the Christ,
the Messiah of Israel


Jesus would NOT CARE ABOUT SCIENCE.

Render unto Caesar. Science is of THIS WORLD. The world of CAESAR.

Caesar has nothing, not even this world which did not evolve but was
created by God Almighty on purpose
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 09:14:44 PM
EXACT QUOTE chapter and verse.
2nd) Your INTERPOLATION of the passage wont stand even if you do QUOTE.
YOU THINK - creation makes evolution impossible.
By your same argument,
EVE should not be able to have children.
God made EVE not children
right?
God making a biogenesis DOES NOT SAY, that life cant evolve.
YOU SAID THAT
not Jesus.
Quoting YOURSELF AS GOD now?
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 21 Sep 2006 10:47:05 AM
wrote:

EXACT QUOTE chapter and verse.

2nd) Your INTERPOLATION of the passage wont stand even if you do QUOTE.

YOU THINK - creation makes evolution impossible.
By your same argument,

EVE should not be able to have children.

God made EVE not children
right?

Human being is God's own PROJECT.
He had a choice to make million Eves and Million Adams at the same
time, He chose the process of multiplication.
Man and woman H created them and said, Multiphy.
This is the TRUTH, THE ONLY TRUTH NOTHING BUT TRUTH


God making a biogenesis DOES NOT SAY, that life cant evolve.

YOU SAID THAT
not Jesus.

Quoting YOURSELF AS GOD now?

.

User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 09:16:19 PM
PS - thanks for proving me exactly correct
AS I SAID...
You ARGUE AWAY what Jesus ACTUALLY TAUGHT "Render unto Caesar"
And replace it by QUOTING YOURSELF.
EXACTLY!
THank you! fake fallen Christian for giving a GREAT example of what a
FRAUD is
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 21 Sep 2006 10:49:24 AM
wrote:

PS - thanks for proving me exactly correct

AS I SAID...

You ARGUE AWAY what Jesus ACTUALLY TAUGHT "Render unto Caesar"

Caesar has nothing even his own life did not belong to him. God took
it when He wanted.


And replace it by QUOTING YOURSELF.

EXACTLY!
THank you! fake fallen Christian for giving a GREAT example of what a
FRAUD is

.

User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 21 Sep 2006 10:53:32 AM
wrote:

PS - thanks for proving me exactly correct

AS I SAID...

You ARGUE AWAY what Jesus ACTUALLY TAUGHT "Render unto Caesar"

The context of Jesus statement was about TAX, Caesar way or Moses
way... Everyday we give to Caesar the taxes which are due and when
we enter our sanctuaries, we give also to God for His poors.
You are the one arguing AWAY what Jesus really taught.


And replace it by QUOTING YOURSELF.

EXACTLY!
THank you! fake fallen Christian for giving a GREAT example of what a
FRAUD is

.






User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 05:23:36 PM
wrote:

Nothing.

Evolution is fully explained BEFORE YOU WERE BORN.

Evolution is the mother of all lies


.
User: "Cary Kittrell"

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 05:25:27 PM
In article <1158791016.234349.72650@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> "codebreaker@bigsecret.com" <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> writes:


slip_identity@yahoo.com wrote:

Nothing.

Evolution is fully explained BEFORE YOU WERE BORN.



Evolution is the mother of all lies

So, no one lied before 1859?
-- cary
.



User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 09:20:35 PM
What's so funny about peace, love and "codebreaker@bigsecret.com"
<Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> posting the following on 20 Sep 2006
15:07:24 -0700 iin alt.atheism?

Now tell me why the Roman Centurion said refferring to Jesus,
This man was really the Son Of God?

You forgot "according to a book written decades later hundreds of
miles away and the line is not repeated in the other Gospels."
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.



User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 19 Sep 2006 03:59:52 PM
On 19 Sep 2006 12:36:48 -0700, "codebreaker@bigsecret.com"
<Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote:


Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

Greywolf


A BRAVADO??????????
Where is that inquiry mind that Evol-secular-atheists use to
characterize themselves?
The whole Bible warns against any tendency to BRAVADO
now you want Christ to use it against His enemies.
Where would that meekness that Christ is suuposed to teach us
in the face of adversities be?
Seculars, you have FAILED yet again to grasp the content of our book.

We grasp it well enough to understand it's *****, which is better
than you're doing.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Evol-Seculars Have Failed To Grasp The Content Of Our Book 20 Sep 2006 05:21:21 PM
John Baker wrote:

On 19 Sep 2006 12:36:48 -0700, "codebreaker@bigsecret.com"
<Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote:


Greywolf wrote:

Have the theists that frequent this NG ever stopped and asked themselves why
the 'risen' Jesus didn't appear to Pontius Pilate, or at a 'full' meeting of
the Sanhedrin, or to an assembly of the 'non-believers' that cried out for
him to be crucified? What, didn't want to 'show-off'? Didn't want to rub it
in their faces? Or could it simply be that he was too dead to make any
further personal appearances?

Greywolf


A BRAVADO??????????
Where is that inquiry mind that Evol-secular-atheists use to
characterize themselves?
The whole Bible warns against any tendency to BRAVADO
now you want Christ to use it against His enemies.
Where would that meekness that Christ is suuposed to teach us
in the face of adversities be?
Seculars, you have FAILED yet again to grasp the content of our book.



We grasp it well enough to understand it's *****, which is better
than you're doing.

Now explain to us how the poster came up with this nonsense?
One Answer, He never read Ecclesiatic or he is
unable to make the connection between Eccl.with the wisdom of Christ.
Secular learning and methodology to the Bible are *****
.




  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER