<atheist@home.com> wrote in message
news:eck7u21u1tb2bahg3o0s4umhq680tlt177@4ax.com...

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:58:12 -0800, "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!"
<stoshu@bellsouth.net.po> wrote:

<atheist@home.com> wrote in message
news:ni77u2pkoaf9k78cu91ap2jj88lsqe17k6@4ax.com...

What a hoot :-)

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/02/26/070226170455.29857e84.html

atheist@home#1554

So is Easter cancelled now? ;)

Weird isn't it?
They keep screeching for people to "Find Jesus" and when it looks like
it may have been done they get all jacked up over it.

I think that's because they didn't mean "Find dead Jesus" ;)

After serious contemplation, on or about Tuesday 27 February 2007 3:41
pm Al Klein perhaps from rukbat@pern.invalid wrote:

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:37:06 -0500, "Michelle Malkin"
<hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:

<atheist@home.com> wrote in message
news:ni77u2pkoaf9k78cu91ap2jj88lsqe17k6@4ax.com...

What a hoot :-)

Would the one ossuary say Jesus or Yehashua? So,
would the kid be the son of Jesus or the son of
Joshua? After all, isn't Jesus a later form of Joshua?

It's just a made-up name to make him different from all the other
Joshuas that have existed through time.

And, weren't all the names found very common names
at the time?

Sure were. The odds that someone had a wife named Mary and a son
named Judah were, from what I heard this morning, about 600:1. Since
there were about 30,000 men in Jerusalem at the time, that means that
there could have been about 50 families in Jerusalem with those names
at that time.

Add to that the fact that there were Greek inscriptions on one ossuary
- something unlikely for a Jew of the time - and we have another
"Forgery of Turin".

Hold on a minute. In all the NT manuscripts Jesus spoke in Greek (or at
least the gospel writers quoted him in Greek unless he spoke Coptic as
portrayed in the Coptic manuscripts). Even Peter (epistle) wrote in a
polished Greek. And now you're saying that could be a forgery? :-P

Now I'm going to worry about the True Nail I bought from some gypsy who
assured me it was one of the genuine three (cross her heart, or maybe
that was fingers). I mean her reading was accurate. She told me I was
going to meet somebody soon (in my business I meet a lot of people).
It would be a tall stranger. Very true because I am rather short of
stature and almost everyone is taller than I am. She said a lot of
wrong things too but nobody can be 100% correct all the time, except
for our resident fundies.

--
Later,
Darrell Stec

Now I'm going to worry about the True Nail I bought from some gypsy who
assured me it was one of the genuine three (cross her heart, or maybe
that was fingers).

I mean her reading was accurate. She told me I was
going to meet somebody soon (in my business I meet a lot of people).
It would be a tall stranger. Very true because I am rather short of
stature and almost everyone is taller than I am. She said a lot of
wrong things too but nobody can be 100% correct all the time, except
for our resident fundies.

In article <Xns98E3D745C3480vicman@66.250.146.128>,
Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote:

One fine day in alt.atheism, "Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian"
<MAILTOsecretary@carcosa.de> bloodied us up with this:

atheist@home.com:

What a hoot :-)

Hey, that could be fun. Let's assume for a moment this is really the
tomb of jebus (unlikely as it is *eg*)...

...how exactly would the cultists claim that this is not the real
gawdman (as the real one mustn't have been married et al)? A whole new
discipline of reality denial would emerge... :)

If they *can* prove this is the body of Jesus, doesn't that prove their
religion to be a crock of *****? No resurrection, no christianity, right?

Especially if tests also show that he had no crucifixion wounds and
probably died peacefully of old age.

Uncle Vic:

If they *can* prove this is the body of Jesus, doesn't that prove
their
religion to be a crock of *****? No resurrection, no christianity,
right?

I wouldn't be too surprised to (in that case) hear from them that
suddenly, surprisingly, "da wholly babble was speaking about
spiritiual resurrection all along!!!11!!!!". I mean, them morontheists
are so totally full of it, why stop at that point?

Uncle Vic:

If they *can* prove this is the body of Jesus, doesn't that prove their
religion to be a crock of *****? No resurrection, no christianity, right?

I wouldn't be too surprised to (in that case) hear from them that suddenly,
surprisingly, "da wholly babble was speaking about spiritiual resurrection
all along!!!11!!!!". I mean, them morontheists are so totally full of it,