Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine

Religions > Atheism > Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 1 of 2

Topic:	Religions > Atheism
User:	"666"
Date:	04 Aug 2006 01:30:20 PM
Object:	Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine

Breast isn't best: readers tell US parenting magazine
by Jocelyne Zablit
Fri Aug 4, 4:38 AM ET
Readers of a US parenting magazine are crying foul over the
publication's latest cover depicting a woman breastfeeding, with some
calling the photo offensive and disgusting.
"I was SHOCKED to see a giant breast on the cover of your magazine,"
one woman from Kansas wrote in reaction to the picture in Babytalk, a
free magazine that caters to young mothers. "I was offended and it made
my husband very uncomfortable when I left the magazine on the coffee
table."
Her reaction was part of some 5,000 letters the magazine has received
in response to a poll to gage reader sentiment about Babytalk's August
cover photo, which shows a baby nursing.
Several readers said they were "embarrassed" or "offended" by the
Babytalk photo and one woman from Nevada said she "immediately turned
the magazine face down" when she saw the photo.
"Gross, I am sick of seeing a baby attached to a boob," the mother of a
four-month-old said.
Another reader said she was "horrified" when she received the magazine
and hoped that her husband hadn't laid eyes on it.
"I had to rip off the cover since I didn't want it laying around the
house," she said.
A national television program also ran a segment on the controversy,
interviewing several people in New York who expressed disgust over the
cover photo.
The picture in Babytalk was aimed at illustrating the controversy
surrounding breastfeeding in the United States, where a national survey
by the American Dietetic Association found that 57 percent of those
polled are opposed to women breastfeeding in public and 72 percent
think it is inappropriate to show a woman breastfeeding on television
programs.
Babytalk executive editor Lisa Moran said though most of those who
responded to the poll about the cover photo gave the magazine a thumbs
up, she was surprised that some 25 percent expressed outrage.
"There is a real puritanical streak in America," Moran told AFP. "You
see celebrities practically baring their breasts all the time and no
one seems to mind in this sort of sexual context.
"But in this very natural context of feeding your child, a lot of
Americans are very uncomfortable with it."
She said the controversy is all the more surprising in light of
concerted efforts by the US government and health professionals to
encourage women to breastfeed.
"Everyone is saying that breastfeeding is best for baby but there is so
little support for it in public," Moran said.
She said the Babytalk cover photo marks the first time a major
parenting magazine in the United States dares to break the taboo about
showing a woman's breast and the outrage it has prompted is not about
to discourage editors from doing it again.
"This hasn't scared us off at all," Moran said. "We're thrilled and
hopefully this will help women get more support for nursing."
Pic at
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060804/od_afp/afplifestyleussocialbreastfeeding
.

User: "Hagar"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	04 Aug 2006 02:32:36 PM

"666" <son0fam@yahoo.com> squeezed a tit, twisted the nipple like a
combination lock, 21 left - 7 right, 14 left and then screamed in message
news:1154716220.375006.42890@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

"From Kansas" just about says it all. After all, they invented "Intelligent
Design" and then O.D.'ed on their stupid pills.
.

User: "Rev. Jones Says \Drink More Koolaid"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	04 Aug 2006 05:38:42 PM

"666" <son0fam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1154716220.375006.42890@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

There's no nipple in the picture. For all anyone knows, that's the back of
Mini Me's head.
--
******************************************
Rev. Mercutio Jones
http://www.myspace.com/therightreverendjones
http://www.myspace.com/dayofthesick
************************************************
.

User: "bushlied"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	05 Aug 2006 03:47:54 PM

666 wrote:

Breast isn't best: readers tell US parenting magazine
by Jocelyne Zablit
Fri Aug 4, 4:38 AM ET

Readers of a US parenting magazine are crying foul over the
publication's latest cover depicting a woman breastfeeding, with some
calling the photo offensive and disgusting.

"I was SHOCKED to see a giant breast on the cover of your magazine,"
one woman from Kansas wrote in reaction to the picture in Babytalk, a
free magazine that caters to young mothers. "I was offended and it made
my husband very uncomfortable when I left the magazine on the coffee
table."

Her reaction was part of some 5,000 letters the magazine has received
in response to a poll to gage reader sentiment about Babytalk's August
cover photo, which shows a baby nursing.

Several readers said they were "embarrassed" or "offended" by the
Babytalk photo and one woman from Nevada said she "immediately turned
the magazine face down" when she saw the photo.

"Gross, I am sick of seeing a baby attached to a boob," the mother of a
four-month-old said.

Another reader said she was "horrified" when she received the magazine
and hoped that her husband hadn't laid eyes on it.

"I had to rip off the cover since I didn't want it laying around the
house," she said.

A national television program also ran a segment on the controversy,
interviewing several people in New York who expressed disgust over the
cover photo.

The picture in Babytalk was aimed at illustrating the controversy
surrounding breastfeeding in the United States, where a national survey
by the American Dietetic Association found that 57 percent of those
polled are opposed to women breastfeeding in public and 72 percent
think it is inappropriate to show a woman breastfeeding on television
programs.

Babytalk executive editor Lisa Moran said though most of those who
responded to the poll about the cover photo gave the magazine a thumbs
up, she was surprised that some 25 percent expressed outrage.

"There is a real puritanical streak in America," Moran told AFP. "You
see celebrities practically baring their breasts all the time and no
one seems to mind in this sort of sexual context.

"But in this very natural context of feeding your child, a lot of
Americans are very uncomfortable with it."

She said the controversy is all the more surprising in light of
concerted efforts by the US government and health professionals to
encourage women to breastfeed.

"Everyone is saying that breastfeeding is best for baby but there is so
little support for it in public," Moran said.

She said the Babytalk cover photo marks the first time a major
parenting magazine in the United States dares to break the taboo about
showing a woman's breast and the outrage it has prompted is not about
to discourage editors from doing it again.

"This hasn't scared us off at all," Moran said. "We're thrilled and
hopefully this will help women get more support for nursing."

Pic at
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060804/od_afp/afplifestyleussocialbreastfeeding

I was amazed at the uproar (not really).
The picture was very tasteful (really no pun intended).
I just laugh at people who would get offended at this.
.

User: "salad"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	06 Aug 2006 01:19:28 PM

bushlied wrote:

666 wrote:

Breast isn't best: readers tell US parenting magazine
by Jocelyne Zablit
Fri Aug 4, 4:38 AM ET

Readers of a US parenting magazine are crying foul over the
publication's latest cover depicting a woman breastfeeding, with some
calling the photo offensive and disgusting.

"I was SHOCKED to see a giant breast on the cover of your magazine,"
one woman from Kansas wrote in reaction to the picture in Babytalk, a
free magazine that caters to young mothers. "I was offended and it made
my husband very uncomfortable when I left the magazine on the coffee
table."

Her reaction was part of some 5,000 letters the magazine has received
in response to a poll to gage reader sentiment about Babytalk's August
cover photo, which shows a baby nursing.

Several readers said they were "embarrassed" or "offended" by the
Babytalk photo and one woman from Nevada said she "immediately turned
the magazine face down" when she saw the photo.

"Gross, I am sick of seeing a baby attached to a boob," the mother of a
four-month-old said.

Another reader said she was "horrified" when she received the magazine
and hoped that her husband hadn't laid eyes on it.

"I had to rip off the cover since I didn't want it laying around the
house," she said.

A national television program also ran a segment on the controversy,
interviewing several people in New York who expressed disgust over the
cover photo.

The picture in Babytalk was aimed at illustrating the controversy
surrounding breastfeeding in the United States, where a national survey
by the American Dietetic Association found that 57 percent of those
polled are opposed to women breastfeeding in public and 72 percent
think it is inappropriate to show a woman breastfeeding on television
programs.

Babytalk executive editor Lisa Moran said though most of those who
responded to the poll about the cover photo gave the magazine a thumbs
up, she was surprised that some 25 percent expressed outrage.

"There is a real puritanical streak in America," Moran told AFP. "You
see celebrities practically baring their breasts all the time and no
one seems to mind in this sort of sexual context.

"But in this very natural context of feeding your child, a lot of
Americans are very uncomfortable with it."

She said the controversy is all the more surprising in light of
concerted efforts by the US government and health professionals to
encourage women to breastfeed.

"Everyone is saying that breastfeeding is best for baby but there is so
little support for it in public," Moran said.

She said the Babytalk cover photo marks the first time a major
parenting magazine in the United States dares to break the taboo about
showing a woman's breast and the outrage it has prompted is not about
to discourage editors from doing it again.

"This hasn't scared us off at all," Moran said. "We're thrilled and
hopefully this will help women get more support for nursing."

Pic at
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060804/od_afp/afplifestyleussocialbreastfeeding

I was amazed at the uproar (not really).

The picture was very tasteful (really no pun intended).

I just laugh at people who would get offended at this.

You know that they are Christian prudes, and their grim husbands that
can't view the picture without distaste.
If they have a problem with the human body, let them take it up with the
designer.
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	07 Aug 2006 04:30:31 PM

On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 18:19:28 GMT, salad <oil@vinegar.com> wrote:

bushlied wrote:

666 wrote:

Breast isn't best: readers tell US parenting magazine
by Jocelyne Zablit
Fri Aug 4, 4:38 AM ET

Pic at
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060804/od_afp/afplifestyleussocialbreastfeeding

OOH Now, that's a nice breast. Perhaps if it were more typically
sized......
Sunyata
.

User: "Les Hemmings"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	04 Aug 2006 01:46:13 PM

666 wrote:

How do yanks actually manage to procreate? Why are there so damn many of
you? If this is the reaction about breastfeeding how on earth do they manage
sex?
Les
--
Remove Frontal Lobes to reply direct.
http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/hxflyers/
http://armsofmorpheus.blogspot.com/
http://www.xenu.net/
http://www.venganza.org/index.htm
Les Hemmings a.a #2251 SA
.

User: "Doc Smartass"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	05 Aug 2006 08:33:00 AM

"Les Hemmings" <les.frontalclaire@lobesvirgin.net> wrote in
news:4jhivjF84a9tU1@individual.net:

666 wrote:

How do yanks actually manage to procreate? Why are there so damn many
of you? If this is the reaction about breastfeeding how on earth do
they manage sex?

Dancing. Well, all except the Baptists.
--
Doc Smartass
Investigate.
Indict.
Impeach.
Imprison.
.

User: "salad"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	04 Aug 2006 02:43:42 PM

Les Hemmings wrote:

666 wrote:

How do yanks actually manage to procreate? Why are there so damn many of
you? If this is the reaction about breastfeeding how on earth do they manage
sex?

Liberals have sex and have fun having sex. For Conservatives, it's a
duty done with eyes closed, lips clenched in a grimace, done only when
the desire to have it child is mutually sought. Foreplay is an obscure
concept to conservatives. So the Conservative woman is usually tight
and dry. That's why she has so many "headache" excuses. The
Conservative male thus hangs out at titty bars and bangs his secretary
of loose morals.

Les

User: "Chip Anderson"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	04 Aug 2006 06:25:14 PM

salad <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in
news:OrNAg.3524$xp2.3074@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:

Les Hemmings wrote:

666 wrote:

How do yanks actually manage to procreate? Why are there so damn many
of you? If this is the reaction about breastfeeding how on earth do
they manage sex?

Liberals have sex and have fun having sex. For Conservatives, it's a
duty done with eyes closed, lips clenched in a grimace, done only when
the desire to have it child is mutually sought. Foreplay is an
obscure concept to conservatives. So the Conservative woman is
usually tight and dry. That's why she has so many "headache" excuses.
The Conservative male thus hangs out at titty bars and bangs his
secretary of loose morals.

So his secretary's a liberal and so must be the working girls at the bar.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.

User: "salad"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	05 Aug 2006 12:28:07 PM

Chip Anderson wrote:

salad <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in
news:OrNAg.3524$xp2.3074@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:

Les Hemmings wrote:

666 wrote:

How do yanks actually manage to procreate? Why are there so damn many
of you? If this is the reaction about breastfeeding how on earth do
they manage sex?

Liberals have sex and have fun having sex. For Conservatives, it's a
duty done with eyes closed, lips clenched in a grimace, done only when
the desire to have it child is mutually sought. Foreplay is an
obscure concept to conservatives. So the Conservative woman is
usually tight and dry. That's why she has so many "headache" excuses.
The Conservative male thus hangs out at titty bars and bangs his
secretary of loose morals.

So his secretary's a liberal and so must be the working girls at the bar.

At least she gets wet. The working girls simply look at you as a trick.
.

User: "Chip Anderson"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	05 Aug 2006 03:40:53 PM

salad <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in
news:Hy4Bg.4280$xp2.3238@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:

Chip Anderson wrote:

salad <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in
news:OrNAg.3524$xp2.3074@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:

Les Hemmings wrote:

666 wrote:

How do yanks actually manage to procreate? Why are there so damn
many of you? If this is the reaction about breastfeeding how on
earth do they manage sex?

Liberals have sex and have fun having sex. For Conservatives, it's a
duty done with eyes closed, lips clenched in a grimace, done only
when the desire to have it child is mutually sought. Foreplay is an
obscure concept to conservatives. So the Conservative woman is
usually tight and dry. That's why she has so many "headache"
excuses.
The Conservative male thus hangs out at titty bars and bangs his
secretary of loose morals.

So his secretary's a liberal and so must be the working girls at the
bar.

At least she gets wet. The working girls simply look at you as a
trick.

So there we have it, some liberals are all wet for conservatives.
--
---
Chip
Oderint dum metuant
-Lucius Accius
.

User: "salad"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	05 Aug 2006 04:42:47 PM

Chip Anderson wrote:

salad <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in
news:Hy4Bg.4280$xp2.3238@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:

Chip Anderson wrote:

salad <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in
news:OrNAg.3524$xp2.3074@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:

Les Hemmings wrote:

666 wrote:

How do yanks actually manage to procreate? Why are there so damn
many of you? If this is the reaction about breastfeeding how on
earth do they manage sex?

Liberals have sex and have fun having sex. For Conservatives, it's a
duty done with eyes closed, lips clenched in a grimace, done only
when the desire to have it child is mutually sought. Foreplay is an
obscure concept to conservatives. So the Conservative woman is
usually tight and dry. That's why she has so many "headache"
excuses.
The Conservative male thus hangs out at titty bars and bangs his
secretary of loose morals.

So his secretary's a liberal and so must be the working girls at the
bar.

At least she gets wet. The working girls simply look at you as a
trick.

So there we have it, some liberals are all wet for conservatives.

And then the conservative goes home to his loveless, dry-as-a-bone wife.
.

User: "Sport Pilot"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	04 Aug 2006 03:20:00 PM

salad wrote:

Les Hemmings wrote:

666 wrote:

How do yanks actually manage to procreate? Why are there so damn many of
you? If this is the reaction about breastfeeding how on earth do they manage
sex?

Les

Total BS!
.

User: "Sport Pilot"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	04 Aug 2006 02:38:48 PM

Les Hemmings wrote:

666 wrote:

How do yanks actually manage to procreate? Why are there so damn many of
you? If this is the reaction about breastfeeding how on earth do they manage
sex?

Les

Don't get me wrong, I have no problems with a photo of a woman breast
feeding. However such photo's are not required for procreating. In
fact I would think it would discourage procreation.
.

User: "eyelessgame"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	08 Aug 2006 12:18:34 PM

Les Hemmings wrote:

666 wrote:

How do yanks actually manage to procreate? Why are there so damn many of
you? If this is the reaction about breastfeeding how on earth do they manage
sex?

Somebody needs to explain to you Euros about the stork.
eyelessgame
.

User: "John Baker"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	04 Aug 2006 02:01:35 PM

On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:46:13 +0100, "Les Hemmings"
<les.frontalclaire@lobesvirgin.net> wrote:

666 wrote:

How do yanks actually manage to procreate? Why are there so damn many of
you? If this is the reaction about breastfeeding how on earth do they manage
sex?

We aren't all religious wack jobs.

Les

User: "Martin"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	04 Aug 2006 05:09:52 PM

666 wrote:

I am sick of seeing a baby attached to a boob," the mother of a
four-month-old said.

Now THAT I can believe!
.

User: "Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	05 Aug 2006 12:35:19 AM

666:

..."I had to rip off the cover since I didn't want it laying around the
house," she said...

Yeah riiight. Ban that disgusting display of _natural_ stuff from public
life! Replace it with some Good American Violence(TM)! Now that's the stuff
that makes America great!
Oh wait...
--
"To his friend a man a friend shall prove, and gifts with gifts requite;
But men shall mocking with mockery answer, and fraud with falsehood meet."
(The Poetic Edda)
Must have been written with fundies in mind...
My personal judgment of monotheism:
http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus
.

User: ""
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	08 Aug 2006 04:29:27 AM

I'd have really been pissed if that baby was eating a big mack.
Americans really need to keep abreast of good nutritional habits.
But I must say, that baby sucks, it it was brad pit, these women would
be taking out the toys and recharging the batteries.
666 wrote:

Breast isn't best: readers tell US parenting magazine
by Jocelyne Zablit
Fri Aug 4, 4:38 AM ET

Readers of a US parenting magazine are crying foul over the
publication's latest cover depicting a woman breastfeeding, with some
calling the photo offensive and disgusting.

"I was SHOCKED to see a giant breast on the cover of your magazine,"
one woman from Kansas wrote in reaction to the picture in Babytalk, a
free magazine that caters to young mothers. "I was offended and it made
my husband very uncomfortable when I left the magazine on the coffee
table."

Her reaction was part of some 5,000 letters the magazine has received
in response to a poll to gage reader sentiment about Babytalk's August
cover photo, which shows a baby nursing.

Several readers said they were "embarrassed" or "offended" by the
Babytalk photo and one woman from Nevada said she "immediately turned
the magazine face down" when she saw the photo.

"Gross, I am sick of seeing a baby attached to a boob," the mother of a
four-month-old said.

Another reader said she was "horrified" when she received the magazine
and hoped that her husband hadn't laid eyes on it.

"I had to rip off the cover since I didn't want it laying around the
house," she said.

A national television program also ran a segment on the controversy,
interviewing several people in New York who expressed disgust over the
cover photo.

The picture in Babytalk was aimed at illustrating the controversy
surrounding breastfeeding in the United States, where a national survey
by the American Dietetic Association found that 57 percent of those
polled are opposed to women breastfeeding in public and 72 percent
think it is inappropriate to show a woman breastfeeding on television
programs.

Babytalk executive editor Lisa Moran said though most of those who
responded to the poll about the cover photo gave the magazine a thumbs
up, she was surprised that some 25 percent expressed outrage.

"There is a real puritanical streak in America," Moran told AFP. "You
see celebrities practically baring their breasts all the time and no
one seems to mind in this sort of sexual context.

"But in this very natural context of feeding your child, a lot of
Americans are very uncomfortable with it."

She said the controversy is all the more surprising in light of
concerted efforts by the US government and health professionals to
encourage women to breastfeed.

"Everyone is saying that breastfeeding is best for baby but there is so
little support for it in public," Moran said.

She said the Babytalk cover photo marks the first time a major
parenting magazine in the United States dares to break the taboo about
showing a woman's breast and the outrage it has prompted is not about
to discourage editors from doing it again.

"This hasn't scared us off at all," Moran said. "We're thrilled and
hopefully this will help women get more support for nursing."

Pic at
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060804/od_afp/afplifestyleussocialbreastfeeding

User: ""
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	08 Aug 2006 04:29:33 AM

Breast isn't best: readers tell US parenting magazine
by Jocelyne Zablit
Fri Aug 4, 4:38 AM ET

Readers of a US parenting magazine are crying foul over the
publication's latest cover depicting a woman breastfeeding, with some
calling the photo offensive and disgusting.

"I was SHOCKED to see a giant breast on the cover of your magazine,"
one woman from Kansas wrote in reaction to the picture in Babytalk, a
free magazine that caters to young mothers. "I was offended and it made
my husband very uncomfortable when I left the magazine on the coffee
table."

Her reaction was part of some 5,000 letters the magazine has received
in response to a poll to gage reader sentiment about Babytalk's August
cover photo, which shows a baby nursing.

Several readers said they were "embarrassed" or "offended" by the
Babytalk photo and one woman from Nevada said she "immediately turned
the magazine face down" when she saw the photo.

"Gross, I am sick of seeing a baby attached to a boob," the mother of a
four-month-old said.

Another reader said she was "horrified" when she received the magazine
and hoped that her husband hadn't laid eyes on it.

"I had to rip off the cover since I didn't want it laying around the
house," she said.

A national television program also ran a segment on the controversy,
interviewing several people in New York who expressed disgust over the
cover photo.

The picture in Babytalk was aimed at illustrating the controversy
surrounding breastfeeding in the United States, where a national survey
by the American Dietetic Association found that 57 percent of those
polled are opposed to women breastfeeding in public and 72 percent
think it is inappropriate to show a woman breastfeeding on television
programs.

Babytalk executive editor Lisa Moran said though most of those who
responded to the poll about the cover photo gave the magazine a thumbs
up, she was surprised that some 25 percent expressed outrage.

"There is a real puritanical streak in America," Moran told AFP. "You
see celebrities practically baring their breasts all the time and no
one seems to mind in this sort of sexual context.

"But in this very natural context of feeding your child, a lot of
Americans are very uncomfortable with it."

She said the controversy is all the more surprising in light of
concerted efforts by the US government and health professionals to
encourage women to breastfeed.

"Everyone is saying that breastfeeding is best for baby but there is so
little support for it in public," Moran said.

She said the Babytalk cover photo marks the first time a major
parenting magazine in the United States dares to break the taboo about
showing a woman's breast and the outrage it has prompted is not about
to discourage editors from doing it again.

"This hasn't scared us off at all," Moran said. "We're thrilled and
hopefully this will help women get more support for nursing."

Pic at
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060804/od_afp/afplifestyleussocialbreastfeeding

User: "Robibnikoff"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	08 Aug 2006 09:05:25 AM

<alohacyberian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1155029373.403592.187860@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

I'd have really been pissed if that baby was eating a big mack.
Americans really need to keep abreast of good nutritional habits.

But I must say, that baby sucks, it it was brad pit, these women would
be taking out the toys and recharging the batteries.

Why?
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.

User: "Stephen Knight"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	04 Aug 2006 11:06:08 PM

On 4 Aug 2006 11:30:20 -0700, "666" <son0fam@yahoo.com> wrote:
snip

Readers of a US parenting magazine are crying foul over the
publication's latest cover depicting a woman breastfeeding, with some
calling the photo offensive and disgusting.

OH MY FUCKING GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This IS shocking! Showing something animals have done for millions
of years in print. Those dirty sex craved babies! Fucking perverts!
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
.

User: "Robibnikoff"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	07 Aug 2006 12:07:08 PM

"Stephen Knight" <wooly51@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sk58d2h7js6956a4595gfgi5936kk8u2hr@4ax.com...

On 4 Aug 2006 11:30:20 -0700, "666" <son0fam@yahoo.com> wrote:

snip

Readers of a US parenting magazine are crying foul over the
publication's latest cover depicting a woman breastfeeding, with some
calling the photo offensive and disgusting.

OH MY FUCKING GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This IS shocking! Showing something animals have done for millions
of years in print. Those dirty sex craved babies! Fucking perverts!

LOL! I saw a cow getting milked at a 4-H fair this past Saturday. Should I
have been offended? :)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.

User: "johac"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	08 Aug 2006 01:32:04 AM

In article <4jpa38F8ues3U1@individual.net>,
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:

"Stephen Knight" <wooly51@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sk58d2h7js6956a4595gfgi5936kk8u2hr@4ax.com...

On 4 Aug 2006 11:30:20 -0700, "666" <son0fam@yahoo.com> wrote:

snip

Readers of a US parenting magazine are crying foul over the
publication's latest cover depicting a woman breastfeeding, with some
calling the photo offensive and disgusting.

OH MY FUCKING GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This IS shocking! Showing something animals have done for millions
of years in print. Those dirty sex craved babies! Fucking perverts!

LOL! I saw a cow getting milked at a 4-H fair this past Saturday. Should I
have been offended? :)

Maybe next these people will want cows to wear burqas. :-)
I also wonder whether these people know what the term 'mammal' means?
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.

User: "Robibnikoff"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	08 Aug 2006 03:56:13 AM

"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-E5E448.23320407082006@news.giganews.com...

In article <4jpa38F8ues3U1@individual.net>,
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:

"Stephen Knight" <wooly51@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sk58d2h7js6956a4595gfgi5936kk8u2hr@4ax.com...

On 4 Aug 2006 11:30:20 -0700, "666" <son0fam@yahoo.com> wrote:

snip

Readers of a US parenting magazine are crying foul over the
publication's latest cover depicting a woman breastfeeding, with some
calling the photo offensive and disgusting.

OH MY FUCKING GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This IS shocking! Showing something animals have done for millions
of years in print. Those dirty sex craved babies! Fucking perverts!

LOL! I saw a cow getting milked at a 4-H fair this past Saturday.
Should I
have been offended? :)

Maybe next these people will want cows to wear burqas. :-)

Don't laugh - I saw sheep in some outfits that could have passed for that.
They were trying to keep their wool looking nice before the competition.
And it was a hot day too, the poor things.

I also wonder whether these people know what the term 'mammal' means?

Of course not, sadly :(
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.

User: "johac"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	08 Aug 2006 11:57:44 PM

In article <4jr1teF9cj28U1@individual.net>,
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:

"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-E5E448.23320407082006@news.giganews.com...

In article <4jpa38F8ues3U1@individual.net>,
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:

"Stephen Knight" <wooly51@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sk58d2h7js6956a4595gfgi5936kk8u2hr@4ax.com...

On 4 Aug 2006 11:30:20 -0700, "666" <son0fam@yahoo.com> wrote:

snip

Readers of a US parenting magazine are crying foul over the
publication's latest cover depicting a woman breastfeeding, with some
calling the photo offensive and disgusting.

OH MY FUCKING GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This IS shocking! Showing something animals have done for millions
of years in print. Those dirty sex craved babies! Fucking perverts!

LOL! I saw a cow getting milked at a 4-H fair this past Saturday.
Should I
have been offended? :)

Maybe next these people will want cows to wear burqas. :-)

Don't laugh - I saw sheep in some outfits that could have passed for that.
They were trying to keep their wool looking nice before the competition.
And it was a hot day too, the poor things.

Really. Come to think of it, I wouldn't want to walk around in a wool
sweater and an overcoat all day when its 95� outside.

I also wonder whether these people know what the term 'mammal' means?

Of course not, sadly :(

If ignorance is bliss, they should be the happiest people around. :-)
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.

User: "Robibnikoff"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	09 Aug 2006 09:52:35 AM

"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-CC4B22.21574408082006@news.giganews.com...

In article <4jr1teF9cj28U1@individual.net>,
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:

"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-E5E448.23320407082006@news.giganews.com...

In article <4jpa38F8ues3U1@individual.net>,
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:

"Stephen Knight" <wooly51@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sk58d2h7js6956a4595gfgi5936kk8u2hr@4ax.com...

On 4 Aug 2006 11:30:20 -0700, "666" <son0fam@yahoo.com> wrote:

snip

Readers of a US parenting magazine are crying foul over the
publication's latest cover depicting a woman breastfeeding, with
some
calling the photo offensive and disgusting.

OH MY FUCKING GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This IS shocking! Showing something animals have done for millions
of years in print. Those dirty sex craved babies! Fucking perverts!

LOL! I saw a cow getting milked at a 4-H fair this past Saturday.
Should I
have been offended? :)

Maybe next these people will want cows to wear burqas. :-)

Don't laugh - I saw sheep in some outfits that could have passed for
that.
They were trying to keep their wool looking nice before the competition.
And it was a hot day too, the poor things.

Really. Come to think of it, I wouldn't want to walk around in a wool
sweater and an overcoat all day when its 95� outside.

At least they had fans blowing on the poor things - Though they didn't look
too happy.

I also wonder whether these people know what the term 'mammal' means?

Of course not, sadly :(

If ignorance is bliss, they should be the happiest people around. :-)

True :P
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.

User: "johac"
Title: Re: Jesus freaks freak out, SHOCKED to see Babytalk magazine	09 Aug 2006 11:47:16 PM

In article <4juauuF9ld5iU1@individual.net>,
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote: